删除或更新信息，请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

人格特质及脑功能连接对社交网络的影响

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01
李依蔓1,3, 刘程1, 庄恺祥1, 霍腾宾1, 徐鹏飞5, 罗跃嘉3,4,5,6, 邱江1,2()
1西南大学心理学部, 重庆 400715
2认知与人格教育部重点实验室, 重庆 400715
3深圳大学心理学院, 深圳 518060
4深圳大学脑疾病与认知科学研究中心, 深圳 518060
5北京师范大学心理学部, 北京 100875
6齐鲁师范学院教师教育学院, 心理学与认知神经科学研究所, 济南 250200
收稿日期:2021-01-11出版日期:2021-12-25发布日期:2021-10-26
通讯作者:邱江E-mail:qiuj318@swu.edu.cn

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(31771231);重庆市自然科学基金项目(cstc2019jcyj-msxmX0520);重庆市社会科学规划项目(2018PY80);中央高校基本科研业务专项资金(SWU119007);国家社科重大项目(20&ZD153);广东省科技项目(2019A050510048)

The influence of personality traits and brain functional connectivity on social networks

LI Yiman1,3, LIU Cheng1, ZHUANG Kaixiang1, HUO Tengbin1, XU Pengfei5, LUO Yuejia3,4,5,6, QIU Jiang1,2()
1School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
2Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Chongqing 400715, China
3School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
4Center for Brain Disorders and Cognitive Sciences, Shenzhen 518060, China
5Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
6Teacher Education College, Qilu Normal University; Institute of Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Jinan 250200, China
Received:2021-01-11Online:2021-12-25Published:2021-10-26
Contact:QIU Jiang E-mail:qiuj318@swu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要： 采用网络分析的方法, 本研究从个体受欢迎程度和个体间亲密程度两方面探究了人格特质对社交网络的影响, 并在此基础上进一步探究了个体间大脑静息态功能连接相似性和社交网络的关系。结果发现：(1)高尽责性的个体在需要“值得信任”特质的社交网络中更受欢迎, 高宜人性的个体在需要“共享时光”的社交网络中更受欢迎; (2)在需要“相同兴趣”特质的社交网络中, 个体间人格相似性和社会距离呈显著负相关关系; (3)同样在需要“相同兴趣”特质的社交网络中, 个体间部分功能连接相似性与社会距离呈显著负相关关系, 这些功能连接主要集中在额顶控制网络以及背侧注意网络; 同时, 部分节点功能连接相似性与社会距离呈显著正相关关系, 这些功能连接主要集中在默认网络。研究结果揭示了人格特质对不同社交网络结构的影响, 以及个体间人格特质相似性和静息态脑网络相似性与社会距离的关系。本研究对理解社交网络的结构, 形成规律以及其中的信息传播规律有着重要启示意义。



图1个体间静息态FC相似性和社会距离的关系分析流程
图1个体间静息态FC相似性和社会距离的关系分析流程



图2在不同社交网络中大五人格特质各维度的分布情况(A-D：颜色越深, 该人格特质得分越高, 节点越大, 节点度越大)及社交网络间相关系数矩阵(E)
图2在不同社交网络中大五人格特质各维度的分布情况(A-D：颜色越深, 该人格特质得分越高, 节点越大, 节点度越大)及社交网络间相关系数矩阵(E)



图3不同社交网络中友谊选择的考虑因素
图3不同社交网络中友谊选择的考虑因素


表1个体间整体人格差异性和社会距离的关系
社交网络 r p
亲近朋友 0.13 0.03
日常活动 -0.02 0.26
社交建议 0.00 0.46
寻求帮助 0.01 0.33
消息分享 0.10 0.04
支持给予 0.01 0.39
善解人意 0.07 0.12
积极感受 0.04 0.16

表1个体间整体人格差异性和社会距离的关系
社交网络 r p
亲近朋友 0.13 0.03
日常活动 -0.02 0.26
社交建议 0.00 0.46
寻求帮助 0.01 0.33
消息分享 0.10 0.04
支持给予 0.01 0.39
善解人意 0.07 0.12
积极感受 0.04 0.16



图4节点水平个体间FC相似性与社会距离显著相关的节点(A, B); 随着社会距离增大, 个体间节点以及网络水平FC相似性的变化(C, D) (红色代表和社会距离呈显著正相关的节点, 蓝色代表和社会距离呈显著负相关的节点, 节点越大, 相似性越强。为了方便比较, 此处单个节点的不同社交距离的平均脑间相似性进行了z值化处理。
图4节点水平个体间FC相似性与社会距离显著相关的节点(A, B); 随着社会距离增大, 个体间节点以及网络水平FC相似性的变化(C, D) (红色代表和社会距离呈显著正相关的节点, 蓝色代表和社会距离呈显著负相关的节点, 节点越大, 相似性越强。为了方便比较, 此处单个节点的不同社交距离的平均脑间相似性进行了z值化处理。


附表1和“亲近朋友”社交网络中的社会距离呈显著相关的节点信息
NO. 脑区 半球 脑网络 MNI坐标 r p
x y z
22 Precuneus_R R Sensory/somatomotor Hand 8 -48 69 0.12 0.04
97 Frontal_Sup_R R Default mode 21 27 50 0.15 0.03
101 Frontal_Mid_R R Default mode 20 33 42 0.13 0.06
110 Cingulum_Ant_R R Default mode 7 37 0 0.19 0.00
124 Lingual_L L Default mode -25 -41 -8 0.17 0.00
126 Fusiform_L L Default mode -32 -39 -15 0.16 0.00
194 Occipital_Mid_R R Fronto-parietal Task Control 35 -66 38 0.12 0.02
193 Frontal_Mid_R R Fronto-parietal Task Control 29 9 57 -0.16 0.03
204 Angular_R R Salience 52 -47 36 -0.13 0.01

附表1和“亲近朋友”社交网络中的社会距离呈显著相关的节点信息
NO. 脑区 半球 脑网络 MNI坐标 r p
x y z
22 Precuneus_R R Sensory/somatomotor Hand 8 -48 69 0.12 0.04
97 Frontal_Sup_R R Default mode 21 27 50 0.15 0.03
101 Frontal_Mid_R R Default mode 20 33 42 0.13 0.06
110 Cingulum_Ant_R R Default mode 7 37 0 0.19 0.00
124 Lingual_L L Default mode -25 -41 -8 0.17 0.00
126 Fusiform_L L Default mode -32 -39 -15 0.16 0.00
194 Occipital_Mid_R R Fronto-parietal Task Control 35 -66 38 0.12 0.02
193 Frontal_Mid_R R Fronto-parietal Task Control 29 9 57 -0.16 0.03
204 Angular_R R Salience 52 -47 36 -0.13 0.01


附表2和“日常活动”社交网络中的社会距离呈显著相关的节点信息
NO. 脑区 半球 脑网络 MNI坐标 r p
x y z
21 Precentral_R R Sensory/somatomotor Hand 26 -21 69 0.10 0.00
34 Postcentral_L L Sensory/somatomotor Hand -21 -34 58 0.12 0.00
39 Paracentral_Lobule_L R Sensory/somatomotor Hand 1 -31 58 0.10 0.01
67 Rolandic_Oper_R R Auditory 41 -26 21 0.09 0.01
77 Lingual_L L Default mode -12 -41 1 0.12 0.00
82 Temporal_Pole_Sup_R R Default mode 44 12 -24 0.09 0.02
97 Frontal_Sup_R R Default mode 21 27 50 0.10 0.02
124 Lingual_L L Default mode -25 -41 -8 0.07 0.04
126 Fusiform_L L Default mode -32 -39 -15 0.08 0.02
136 Precuneus_R R Memory retrieval 3 -50 48 0.08 0.01
242 Frontal_Inf_Tri_L L Ventral attention -47 21 2 0.07 0.02
251 Precuneus_R R Dorsal attention 8 -63 57 0.08 0.03
261 Precentral_L L Dorsal attention -32 -5 53 0.08 0.01

附表2和“日常活动”社交网络中的社会距离呈显著相关的节点信息
NO. 脑区 半球 脑网络 MNI坐标 r p
x y z
21 Precentral_R R Sensory/somatomotor Hand 26 -21 69 0.10 0.00
34 Postcentral_L L Sensory/somatomotor Hand -21 -34 58 0.12 0.00
39 Paracentral_Lobule_L R Sensory/somatomotor Hand 1 -31 58 0.10 0.01
67 Rolandic_Oper_R R Auditory 41 -26 21 0.09 0.01
77 Lingual_L L Default mode -12 -41 1 0.12 0.00
82 Temporal_Pole_Sup_R R Default mode 44 12 -24 0.09 0.02
97 Frontal_Sup_R R Default mode 21 27 50 0.10 0.02
124 Lingual_L L Default mode -25 -41 -8 0.07 0.04
126 Fusiform_L L Default mode -32 -39 -15 0.08 0.02
136 Precuneus_R R Memory retrieval 3 -50 48 0.08 0.01
242 Frontal_Inf_Tri_L L Ventral attention -47 21 2 0.07 0.02
251 Precuneus_R R Dorsal attention 8 -63 57 0.08 0.03
261 Precentral_L L Dorsal attention -32 -5 53 0.08 0.01


附表3和“社交建议”社交网络中的社会距离呈显著相关的节点信息
NO. 脑区 半球 脑网络 MNI坐标 r p
x y z
82 Temporal_Pole_Sup_R R Default mode 44 12 -24 0.06 0.01
117 Temporal_Mid_L L Default mode -53 -15 -9 0.06 0.00
248 Fusiform_L L Uncertain -29 -12 -33 0.04 0.01
8 Fusiform_L L Uncertain -35 -30 -24 -0.04 0.03
79 Temporal_Mid_L L Default mode -44 -61 18 -0.05 0.02

附表3和“社交建议”社交网络中的社会距离呈显著相关的节点信息
NO. 脑区 半球 脑网络 MNI坐标 r p
x y z
82 Temporal_Pole_Sup_R R Default mode 44 12 -24 0.06 0.01
117 Temporal_Mid_L L Default mode -53 -15 -9 0.06 0.00
248 Fusiform_L L Uncertain -29 -12 -33 0.04 0.01
8 Fusiform_L L Uncertain -35 -30 -24 -0.04 0.03
79 Temporal_Mid_L L Default mode -44 -61 18 -0.05 0.02


附表4和“寻求帮助”社交网络中的社会距离呈显著相关的节点信息
NO. 脑区 半球 脑网络 MNI坐标 r p
x y z
242 Frontal_Inf_Tri_L L Ventral attention -47 21 2 0.07 0.01
33 Parietal_Inf_L L Sensory/somatomotor -44 -34 44 -0.09 0.00
37 Precentral_L L Sensory/somatomotor -38 -18 66 -0.06 0.03
159 Cuneus_R R Visual 14 -77 28 -0.07 0.02
220 Frontal_Mid_L L Salience -38 45 21 -0.07 0.01
228 Putamen L Subcortical -15 0 10 -0.05 0.03

附表4和“寻求帮助”社交网络中的社会距离呈显著相关的节点信息
NO. 脑区 半球 脑网络 MNI坐标 r p
x y z
242 Frontal_Inf_Tri_L L Ventral attention -47 21 2 0.07 0.01
33 Parietal_Inf_L L Sensory/somatomotor -44 -34 44 -0.09 0.00
37 Precentral_L L Sensory/somatomotor -38 -18 66 -0.06 0.03
159 Cuneus_R R Visual 14 -77 28 -0.07 0.02
220 Frontal_Mid_L L Salience -38 45 21 -0.07 0.01
228 Putamen L Subcortical -15 0 10 -0.05 0.03


附表5和“消息分享”社交网络中的社会距离呈显著相关的节点信息
NO. 脑区 半球 脑网络 MNI坐标 r p
x y z
7 ParaHippocampal_R R Uncertain 17 -30 -15 0.10 0.03
82 Temporal_Pole_Sup_R R Default mode 44 12 -24 0.16 0.00
97 Frontal_Sup_R R Default mode 21 27 50 0.13 0.02
101 Frontal_Mid_R R Default mode 20 33 42 0.17 0.01
126 Fusiform_L L Default mode -32 -39 -15 0.12 0.01
205 Precentral_R R Salience 39 -5 48 0.11 0.05
210 Insula_R R Salience 35 27 3 0.09 0.02
237 Temporal_Mid_L L Ventral attention -53 -41 12 0.13 0.02
241 Frontal_Inf_Tri_R R Ventral attention 50 27 6 0.08 0.02
70 Temporal_Sup_L L Auditory -53 -12 12 -0.12 0.03
201 Frontal_Inf_Tri_L L Fronto-parietal Task Control -41 20 31 -0.11 0.02
252 Temporal_Mid_L L Dorsal attention -50 -63 3 -0.17 0.00

附表5和“消息分享”社交网络中的社会距离呈显著相关的节点信息
NO. 脑区 半球 脑网络 MNI坐标 r p
x y z
7 ParaHippocampal_R R Uncertain 17 -30 -15 0.10 0.03
82 Temporal_Pole_Sup_R R Default mode 44 12 -24 0.16 0.00
97 Frontal_Sup_R R Default mode 21 27 50 0.13 0.02
101 Frontal_Mid_R R Default mode 20 33 42 0.17 0.01
126 Fusiform_L L Default mode -32 -39 -15 0.12 0.01
205 Precentral_R R Salience 39 -5 48 0.11 0.05
210 Insula_R R Salience 35 27 3 0.09 0.02
237 Temporal_Mid_L L Ventral attention -53 -41 12 0.13 0.02
241 Frontal_Inf_Tri_R R Ventral attention 50 27 6 0.08 0.02
70 Temporal_Sup_L L Auditory -53 -12 12 -0.12 0.03
201 Frontal_Inf_Tri_L L Fronto-parietal Task Control -41 20 31 -0.11 0.02
252 Temporal_Mid_L L Dorsal attention -50 -63 3 -0.17 0.00


附表6和“支持给予”社交网络中的社会距离呈显著相关的节点信息
NO. 脑区 半球 脑网络 MNI坐标 r p
x y z
13 Precuneus_L L Sensory/somatomotor Hand -8 -54 57 0.08 0.01
82 Temporal_Pole_Sup_R R Default mode 44 12 -24 0.09 0.01
97 Frontal_Sup_R R Default mode 21 27 50 0.08 0.02
76 Frontal_Med_Orb_R R Default mode 8 42 -9 -0.08 0.02

附表6和“支持给予”社交网络中的社会距离呈显著相关的节点信息
NO. 脑区 半球 脑网络 MNI坐标 r p
x y z
13 Precuneus_L L Sensory/somatomotor Hand -8 -54 57 0.08 0.01
82 Temporal_Pole_Sup_R R Default mode 44 12 -24 0.09 0.01
97 Frontal_Sup_R R Default mode 21 27 50 0.08 0.02
76 Frontal_Med_Orb_R R Default mode 8 42 -9 -0.08 0.02


附表7和“善解人意”社交网络中的社会距离呈显著相关的节点信息
NO. 脑区 半球 脑网络 MNI坐标 r p
x y z
23 Postcentral_L L Sensory/somatomotor Hand -23 -33 69 0.14 0.01
56 Insula_R R Cingulo-opercular Task Control 47 4 3 0.15 0.02
61 Heschl_R R Auditory 30 -29 14 0.14 0.01
63 Temporal_Sup_R R Auditory 55 -19 10 0.15 0.01
64 Rolandic_Oper_L L Auditory -37 -35 16 0.12 0.02
65 Temporal_Sup_L L Auditory -58 -27 13 0.16 0.01
66 Temporal_Sup_L L Auditory -47 -28 5 0.12 0.02
72 SupraMarginal_R R Auditory 56 -21 30 0.16 0.01
99 Frontal_Sup_L L Default mode -17 23 54 0.13 0.02
104 Frontal_Sup_L L Default mode -20 39 42 0.13 0.02
105 Cingulum_Ant_R R Default mode 5 48 21 0.14 0.02
111 Cingulum_Ant_L L Default mode -11 39 12 0.13 0.03
117 Temporal_Mid_L L Default mode -53 -15 -9 0.13 0.02
119 Temporal_Mid_R R Default mode 62 -33 -6 0.14 0.02
139 Frontal_Inf_Orb_R R Default mode 47 30 -6 0.14 0.01
140 Lingual_R R Uncertain 8 -90 -9 0.09 0.04
143 Lingual_R R Visual 17 -48 -9 0.21 0.00
145 Calcarine_R R Visual 8 -72 9 0.13 0.02
150 Fusiform_R R Visual 26 -60 -9 0.17 0.00
151 Lingual_L L Visual -14 -72 -9 0.14 0.02
159 Cuneus_R R Visual 14 -77 28 0.14 0.01
167 Cuneus_L L Visual -3 -81 18 0.14 0.02
177 Parietal_Inf_L L Fronto-parietal Task Control -51 -50 39 0.11 0.01
184 Cerebelum_Crus2_R R Uncertain 17 -79 -34 0.13 0.02
227 Pallidum_L L Subcortical -21 4 -2 0.14 0.01
229 Putamen_R R Subcortical 29 -17 4 0.14 0.02
231 Putamen_R R Subcortical 27 -3 7 0.16 0.01
242 Frontal_Inf_Tri_L L Ventral attention -47 21 2 0.12 0.01
1 Lingual_L L Uncertain -23 -96 -15 -0.14 0.00
201 Frontal_Inf_Tri_L L Fronto-parietal Task Control -41 20 31 -0.11 0.02

附表7和“善解人意”社交网络中的社会距离呈显著相关的节点信息
NO. 脑区 半球 脑网络 MNI坐标 r p
x y z
23 Postcentral_L L Sensory/somatomotor Hand -23 -33 69 0.14 0.01
56 Insula_R R Cingulo-opercular Task Control 47 4 3 0.15 0.02
61 Heschl_R R Auditory 30 -29 14 0.14 0.01
63 Temporal_Sup_R R Auditory 55 -19 10 0.15 0.01
64 Rolandic_Oper_L L Auditory -37 -35 16 0.12 0.02
65 Temporal_Sup_L L Auditory -58 -27 13 0.16 0.01
66 Temporal_Sup_L L Auditory -47 -28 5 0.12 0.02
72 SupraMarginal_R R Auditory 56 -21 30 0.16 0.01
99 Frontal_Sup_L L Default mode -17 23 54 0.13 0.02
104 Frontal_Sup_L L Default mode -20 39 42 0.13 0.02
105 Cingulum_Ant_R R Default mode 5 48 21 0.14 0.02
111 Cingulum_Ant_L L Default mode -11 39 12 0.13 0.03
117 Temporal_Mid_L L Default mode -53 -15 -9 0.13 0.02
119 Temporal_Mid_R R Default mode 62 -33 -6 0.14 0.02
139 Frontal_Inf_Orb_R R Default mode 47 30 -6 0.14 0.01
140 Lingual_R R Uncertain 8 -90 -9 0.09 0.04
143 Lingual_R R Visual 17 -48 -9 0.21 0.00
145 Calcarine_R R Visual 8 -72 9 0.13 0.02
150 Fusiform_R R Visual 26 -60 -9 0.17 0.00
151 Lingual_L L Visual -14 -72 -9 0.14 0.02
159 Cuneus_R R Visual 14 -77 28 0.14 0.01
167 Cuneus_L L Visual -3 -81 18 0.14 0.02
177 Parietal_Inf_L L Fronto-parietal Task Control -51 -50 39 0.11 0.01
184 Cerebelum_Crus2_R R Uncertain 17 -79 -34 0.13 0.02
227 Pallidum_L L Subcortical -21 4 -2 0.14 0.01
229 Putamen_R R Subcortical 29 -17 4 0.14 0.02
231 Putamen_R R Subcortical 27 -3 7 0.16 0.01
242 Frontal_Inf_Tri_L L Ventral attention -47 21 2 0.12 0.01
1 Lingual_L L Uncertain -23 -96 -15 -0.14 0.00
201 Frontal_Inf_Tri_L L Fronto-parietal Task Control -41 20 31 -0.11 0.02


附表8和“积极感受”社交网络中的社会距离呈显著相关的节点信息
NO. 脑区 半球 脑网络 MNI坐标 r p
x y z
20 Parietal_Inf_L L Sensory/somatomotor Hand -52 -25 41 0.11 0.02
35 Paracentral_Lobule_L L Sensory/somatomotor Hand -14 -21 72 0.12 0.00
176 Frontal_Inf_Oper_L L Fronto-parietal Task Control -45 7 24 0.10 0.01
187 Precentral_L L Fronto-parietal Task Control -40 2 33 0.11 0.01
194 Occipital_Mid_R R Fronto-parietal Task Control 35 -66 38 0.09 0.01
222 Thalamus_R R Subcortical 6 -26 1 0.08 0.01
13 Precuneus_L L Sensory/somatomotor -8 -54 57 -0.10 0.02
76 Frontal_Med_Orb_R R Default mode 8 42 -9 -0.11 0.02
217 Cingulum_Ant_R R Salience 9 17 30 -0.12 0.01

附表8和“积极感受”社交网络中的社会距离呈显著相关的节点信息
NO. 脑区 半球 脑网络 MNI坐标 r p
x y z
20 Parietal_Inf_L L Sensory/somatomotor Hand -52 -25 41 0.11 0.02
35 Paracentral_Lobule_L L Sensory/somatomotor Hand -14 -21 72 0.12 0.00
176 Frontal_Inf_Oper_L L Fronto-parietal Task Control -45 7 24 0.10 0.01
187 Precentral_L L Fronto-parietal Task Control -40 2 33 0.11 0.01
194 Occipital_Mid_R R Fronto-parietal Task Control 35 -66 38 0.09 0.01
222 Thalamus_R R Subcortical 6 -26 1 0.08 0.01
13 Precuneus_L L Sensory/somatomotor -8 -54 57 -0.10 0.02
76 Frontal_Med_Orb_R R Default mode 8 42 -9 -0.11 0.02
217 Cingulum_Ant_R R Salience 9 17 30 -0.12 0.01



附图1不同社交网络在友谊选择因素上的相关矩阵图：第一个矩阵是原始社交网络间的相关矩阵图, 剩下的是根据友谊选择因素计算出来的网络间相似性矩阵, 所有矩阵从上到下从左到右的网络分别是：亲近朋友, 日常活动, 社交建议, 寻求帮助, 消息分享, 支持给予, 善解人意和积极感受网络。
附图1不同社交网络在友谊选择因素上的相关矩阵图：第一个矩阵是原始社交网络间的相关矩阵图, 剩下的是根据友谊选择因素计算出来的网络间相似性矩阵, 所有矩阵从上到下从左到右的网络分别是：亲近朋友, 日常活动, 社交建议, 寻求帮助, 消息分享, 支持给予, 善解人意和积极感受网络。







[1] Alahyane N., Brien D. C., Coe B. C., Stroman P. W., & Munoz D. P.(2014). Developmental improvements in voluntary control of behavior: Effect of preparation in the fronto-parietal network? Neuroimage, 98, 103-117.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.008pmid: 24642280
[2] Berger C. R., & Calabrese R. J.(1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99-112.
doi: 10.1111/hcre.1975.1.issue-2URL
[3] Blakemore S.(2008). The social brain in adolescence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(4), 267-277.
doi: 10.1038/nrn2353URL
[4] Borgatti S. P., Mehra A., Brass D. J., & Labianca G.(2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323, 892-896.
doi: 10.1126/science.1165821pmid: 19213908
[5] Clore G. L., & Byrne D.(1974). A reinforcement-affect model of attraction. Foundations of Interpersonal Attraction, 143- 170.
[6] Costa P. T., & McCrae R. R.(1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5.
doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5URL
[7] Ely R. J., & Thomas D. A. Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 229- 273.
doi: 10.2307/2667087URL
[8] Falk E. B., & Bassett D. S.(2017). Brain and social networks: Fundamental building blocks of human experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(9), 674-690. doi: 10.1016/j.tics. 2017.06.009
doi: 10.1016/j.tics. 2017.06.009URL
[9] Fassbender C., Simoes-Franklin C., Murphy K., Hester R., Meaney J., Robertson I. H., & Garavan H.(2006). The role of a right fronto-parietal network in cognitive control. Journal of Psychophysiology, 20(4), 286-296. doi: 10.1027/ 0269-8803.20.4.286
doi: 10.1027/ 0269-8803.20.4.286URL
[10] Feiler D. C., & Kleinbaum A. M.(2015). Popularity, similarity, and the network extraversion bias. Psychological Science, 26(5), 593-603. doi: 10.1177/0956797615569580
doi: 10.1177/0956797615569580URL
[11] Fingelkurts A. A., & Fingelkurts A. A.(2011). Persistent operational synchrony within brain default-mode network and self-processing operations in healthy subjects. Brain and Cognition, 75(2), 79-90. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.11. 015
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.11.015pmid: 21172727
[12] Furler K., Gomez V., & Grob A.(2013). Personality similarity and life satisfaction in couples. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(4), 369-375. doi: 10.1016/j. jrp.2013.03.002
doi: 10.1016/j. jrp.2013.03.002URL
[13] Gattis K. S., Berns S., Simpson L. E., & Christensen A.(2004). Birds of a feather or strange birds? Ties among personality dimensions, similarity, and marital quality. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(4), 564-574. doi: 10. 1037/0893-3200.18.4.564
doi: 10. 1037/0893-3200.18.4.564URL
[14] Goldberg L. R.(1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26.
doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26URL
[15] Goldin P. R., Ziv M., Jazaieri H., Weeks J., Heimberg R. G., & Gross J. J.(2014). Impact of cognitive-behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder on the neural bases of emotional reactivity to and regulation of social evaluation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 62, 97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.08.005
doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.08.005URL
[16] Graziano W. G., Habashi M. M., Sheese B. E., & Tobin R. M.(2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person x situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 583-599. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.583
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.583pmid: 17892333
[17] Graziano W. G., & Tobin R. M.(2010). Agreeableness: Dimension of personality or social desirability artifact?. Journal of Personality, 70(5), 695-728.
doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.05021URL
[18] Greicius M. D., Supekar K., Menon V., & Dougherty R. F.(2009). Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. Cereb Cortex, 19(1), 72-78. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn059
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn059pmid: 18403396
[19] Harrison D. A., Price K. H., & Bell M. P.(1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96-107.
[20] Humbad M. N., Donnellan M. B., Iacono W. G., McGue M., & Burt S. A.(2010). Is spousal similarity for personality a matter of convergence or selection? Personality and Individual Differences, 49(7), 827-830. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.010
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.010URL
[21] Hyon R., Kleinbaum A. M., & Parkinson C.(2019). Social network proximity predicts similar trajectories of psychological states: Evidence from multi-voxel spatiotemporal dynamics. Neuroimage, 116492. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116492
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116492
[22] Jaaskelainen I. P., Pajula J., Tohka J., Lee H. J., Kuo W. J., & Lin F. H.(2016). Brain hemodynamic activity during viewing and re-viewing of comedy movies explained by experienced humor. Scientific Reports, 6, 27741. doi: 10. 1038/srep27741
doi: 10. 1038/srep27741URL
[23] Jensen-Campbell L. A., Adams R., Perry D. G., Workman K. A., Furdella J. Q., & Egan S. K.(2002). Agreeableness, extraversion, and peer relations in early adolescence: Winning friends and deflecting aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(3), 224-251. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.2002.2348
doi: 10.1006/jrpe.2002.2348URL
[24] Jensen-Campbell L. A., & Graziano W. G.(2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69:2.
[25] Jensen-Campbell L. A., & Graziano W. G.(2005). The two faces of temptation: Differing motives for self-control. Merrill-Palmer, 51, 287-314.
[26] Kaplan S. C., Levinson C. A., Rodebaugh T. L., Menatti A., & Weeks J. W.(2015). Social anxiety and the big five personality traits: The interactive relationship of trust and openness. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 44(3), 212-222. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2015.1008032
doi: 10.1080/16506073.2015.1008032URL
[27] Klein K. J., Lim B.-C., Saltz J. L., & Mayer D. M.(2004). How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 952-963. doi: 10.2307/20159634
doi: 10.2307/20159634
[28] Landis B.(2016). Personality and social networks in organizations: A review and future directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, S107-S121. doi: 10.1002/job.2004
doi: 10.1002/job.2004
[29] Maarten S., Susan B., & Wim M.(2007). Similarity in adolescent best friendships: The role of gender. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 63(2), 42-48. doi: 10.1007/bf03061061
doi: 10.1007/bf03061061URL
[30] Massen J. J. M., & Koski S. E.(2014). Chimps of a feather sit together: Chimpanzee friendships are based on homophily in personality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(1), 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.008
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.008URL
[31] McKinney A. P.(2013). What lies ahead: Emerging trends in the diversity pipeline among new entrants in the workforce. Journal of Business Diversity, 13(1/2), 83-95.
[32] McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., & Cook J. M.(2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Reviews, 27, 415-444.
[33] Morelli S. A., Leong Y. C., Carlson R. W., Kullar M., & Zaki J.(2018). Neural detection of socially valued community members. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(32), 8149-8154.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712811115URL
[34] Morelli S. A., Ong D. C., Makati R., Jackson M. O., & Zaki J.(2017). Empathy and well-being correlate with centrality in different social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(37), 9843-9847. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702155114
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702155114URL
[35] Nummenmaa L., Glerean E., Viinikainen M., Jaaskelainen I. P., Hari R., & Sams M.(2012). Emotions promote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(24), 9599-9604. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206095109
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206095109pmid: 22623534
[36] Parkinson C., Kleinbaum A. M., & Wheatley T.(2018). Similar neural responses predict friendship. Nature Communications, 9(1), 332. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02722-7
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02722-7pmid: 29382820
[37] Power J. D., Cohen A. L., Nelson S. M., Wig G. S., Barnes K. A., Church J. A., … Petersen S. E.(2011). Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron, 72(4), 665-678. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.006
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.006URL
[38] Roberts B. W., Chernyshenko O. S., Stark S., & Goldberg L. R.(2005). The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58, 103-139.
doi: 10.1111/peps.2005.58.issue-1URL
[39] Rothbart M. K., Ahadi S. A., & Evans D. E.(2000). Temperament and personality: Origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 122.
pmid: 10653510
[40] Schaffer B. S.(2019). Examining reactions to workplace diversity: The role of dissimilarity-attraction in teams. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 36(1), 57-69. doi: 10.1002/cjas.1476
doi: 10.1002/cjas.1476URL
[41] Selfhout M., Burk W., Branje S., Denissen J., van Aken M., & Meeus W.(2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and big five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509-538. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00625.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00625.xpmid: 20433629
[42] Sestieri C., Corbetta M., Romani G. L., & Shulman G. L.(2011). Episodic memory retrieval, parietal cortex, and the default mode network: Functional and topographic analyses. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(12), 4407-4420. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3335-10.2011
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3335-10.2011URL
[43] Simon S. S., Varangis E., & Stern Y.(2020). Associations between personality and whole-brain functional connectivity at rest: Evidence across the adult lifespan. Brain and Behavior, 10(2), e01515. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1515
doi: 10.1002/brb3.1515
[44] Vogel A. C., Miezin F. M., Petersen S. E., & Schlaggar B. L.(2012). The putative visual word form area is functionally connected to the dorsal attention network. Cereb Cortex, 22(3), 537-549. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr100
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr100URL
[45] Vogeley K., & Fink G. R.(2003). Neural correlates of the first-person-perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(1), 38-42.
pmid: 12517357
[46] Vohs K. D., & Baumeister R. F.(2016). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. Guilford Publications.
[47] Wig G. S.(2017). Segregated systems of human brain networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(12), 981-996. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.09.006
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.09.006URL
[48] Wolfer R., Cortina K. S., & Baumert J.(2012). Embeddedness and empathy: How the social network shapes adolescents' social understanding. Journal of Adolescence, 35(5), 1295-1305. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.015
doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.015URL
[49] Wu J., Dong D., Jackson T., Wang Y., Huang J., & Chen H.(2015). The neural correlates of optimistic and depressive tendencies of self-evaluations and resting-state default mode network. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 618. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00618
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00618
[50] Wu X. R., He H., Shi L., Xia Y. M., Zuang K. X., Feng Q. Y., … Qiu J.(2019). Personality traits are related with dynamic functional connectivity in major depression disorder: A resting-state analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 245, 1032-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.002
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.002URL
[51] Yang W. J., Cun L. L., Du X., Yang J. Y., Wang Y. Q., Wei D. T., … Qiu J.(2015). Gender differences in brain structure and resting-state functional connectivity related to narcissistic personality. Scientific Reports, 5(1). doi: 10.1038/srep10924
doi: 10.1038/srep10924
[52] Zanto T. P., & Gazzaley A.(2013). Fronto-parietal network: flexible hub of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(12), 602-603. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.001
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.001URL




[1]蔡惠燕, 苗心, 王鹏飞, 林志为, 王孟成, 杨文登, 麻彦坤, 曾红. 长期戒断海洛因成瘾者冲动性相关脑区的结构及功能特征[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(8): 861-874.
[2]黄敏学;雷蕾;朱华伟. 谈钱还是谈情：企业如何引导消费者分享自媒体营销[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(2): 211-220.
[3]姚若松;陈怀锦;苗群鹰. 公交行业一线员工人格特质对工作绩效影响的实证分析[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(10): 1163-1178.
[4]黄敏儿,吴钟琦,唐淦琦. 服务行业员工的人格特质、情绪劳动策略与心理健康的关系[J]. 心理学报, 2010, 42(12): 1175-1189.
[5]范为桥,张妙清,张树辉,梁觉. 香港中学生人格特质的性别差异及其发展性分析[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(09): 1002-1012.
[6]夏凌翔,黄希庭
. 青少年学生的自立人格[J]. 心理学报, 2006, 38(03): 382-391.
[7]王道阳,张更立,姚本先. 大学生性别角色观的差异[J]. 心理学报, 2005, 37(05): 658-664.
[8]李育辉,张建新. 中学生人格特质、主观应激与应对风格之间的关系[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(01): 71-77.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5106
相关话题/网络 社会 信息 心理 社交

Free考研考试FreeKaoYan.Com
欢迎来到Free考研考试，"为实现人生的Free而奋斗"

© 2020 FreeKaoYan! . All rights reserved.