杨柯,
姜春霞,
张伟,
黄明镜,
刘化涛,
闫六英,
刘恩科,
翟广谦,
王娟玲,
山西农业大学山西有机旱作农业研究院/黄土高原东部旱作节水技术国家地方联合工程实验室/有机旱作山西省重点实验室 太原 030031
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目2016YFD0300305
山西省重点研发计划重点项目201703D211002
山西省农业科学院应用基础研究计划项目YCX2020YQ59
详细信息
作者简介:张冬梅, 主要从事旱作栽培技术研究。E-mail: 13803401159@163.com
通讯作者:王娟玲, 主要研究方向为旱作节水技术。E-mail: wjl_bb@163.com
中图分类号:S513;S352计量
文章访问数:159
HTML全文浏览量:14
PDF下载量:285
被引次数:0
出版历程
收稿日期:2020-07-21
录用日期:2020-12-16
刊出日期:2021-04-01
Lodging characteristics after physiological maturity of spring maize sowed at different dates and its influencing factors
ZHANG Dongmei,YANG Ke,
JIANG Chunxia,
ZHANG Wei,
HUANG Mingjing,
LIU Huatao,
YAN Liuying,
LIU Enke,
ZHAI Guangqian,
WANG Juanling,
Shanxi Institute of Organic Dryland Farming, Shanxi Agricultural University/National Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Water-Saving Techniques for Dry Farming in the Eastern Loess Plateau/Key Laboratory of Organic Dry Farming of Shanxi Province, Taiyuan 030031
Funds: the National Key Research and Development Project of China2016YFD0300305
the Key Projects of Research and Development Plan of Shanxi Province201703D211002
the Applied Basic Research Project of Shanxi Academy of Agricultural SciencesYCX2020YQ59
More Information
Corresponding author:WANG Juanling, E-mail: wjl_bb@163.com
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要
摘要:山西中南部光热资源丰富，适宜春玉米生产的播期范围较宽，如何通过播期调整适应区域气象及生产特点实现高产抗倒，是该区域推广应用玉米机械粒收技术的重要问题。为此，于2019年在山西省农业科学院东阳试验示范基地，以前期筛选出的密植高产宜机收玉米品种‘金科玉3306’和当地主栽玉米品种‘中地88’为材料，比较分析了5个播期（4月16日、4月23日、4月30日、5月7日、5月14日）下生育时期、生理成熟后倒伏及产量的变化情况，并探讨了影响倒伏的主要生物学及力学因素。结果表明：‘金科玉3306’生理成熟后倒伏率不同播期之间没有显著差异，其中后4个播期倒伏率始终为0；而‘中地88’随着播期推迟，生理成熟后倒伏率显著增加（P < 0.05）。根据拟合方程，‘中地88’ 4月30日、5月7日和5月14日播种，立秆脱水期每推迟10 d，倒伏率分别增加1.3、2.4和3.2个百分点。通过抗倒性能影响因素分析，第3~4节节长、穗位高系数、重心高度可作为评价抗倒性的负效应指标，第4节单位长度干重、第3节抗弯折强度和单位长度湿重可作为评价抗倒性的正效应指标。随着播期推迟，两个品种生物产量和经济产量都表现出先显著增加后降低的趋势。推荐4月30日左右为该区域实现高产抗倒，推广玉米机械粒收技术的适宜播种日期。
关键词:播期/
春玉米/
生理成熟/
倒伏/
立秆脱水
Abstract:In the middle-south of Shanxi Province, light and heat resources are abundant leading to a wide range of sowing date for spring maize. A suitable sowing date should achieve high yield and lodging resistance by adapting to the regional meteorological and production characteristics. Therefore sowing date adjustment is an important issue in the popularization and application of mechanical grain harvesting technology for spring maize in this region. A field experiment was conducted in Dongyang Experiment and Demonstration Base of Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences in 2019, consisting of 2 maize cultivars ('JKY3306' and 'ZD88') and 5 sowing date (April 16, April 23, April 30, May 7 and May 30). 'JKY3306' is a screened out cultivar with high yield and suitable for high population and mechanical grain harvesting; while 'ZD88' is a local cultivar. The results showed that lodging rates after physiological maturity of 'JKY3306' at different sowing dates had no significant difference. And lodging rates at the last four sowing dates was always 0. However, the lodging rate after physiological maturity of 'ZD88' increased significantly with the delay of sowing date (P < 0.05). According to the fitting equation, the lodging rate of 'ZD88' sowed at April 30, May 7 and May 14 was respectively increased by 1.3, 2.4 and 3.2 percentage points for every 10 days during grain dehydration period. Through the analysis of influencing factors on lodging resistance, the length of the third and fourth internode, the coefficient of ear height and the gravity center height could be used as the negative effect indexes to evaluate the lodging resistance. And the dry weight per unit length of the fourth internode, the bending strength of the third internode and the wet weight per unit length of the third internode could be used as the positive effect indexes. With the delay of sowing date, the biological yield and economic yield of the two varieties increased significantly at first and then decreased. Spring maize sowed around April 30 can achieve high yield and lodging resistance in this region. Therefore, April 30 is a suitable sowing date to popularize mechanical grain harvesting technology in spring production.
Key words:Sowing date/
Spring maize/
Physiological maturity/
Lodging/
Grain dehydration in the field
HTML全文
图1试验区2019年与多年平均(1980—2010年)玉米生长期逐旬平均温度和降水量变化
Figure1.Average ten-day temperature and precipitation from April to November in 2019 and the mean data from 1980 to 2010
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图2玉米茎秆性状与倒伏率和茎秆抗折断力相关分析
“+”表示正相关, “-”表示负相关“+”
Figure2.Correlation analysis of stalk characters and stalk lodging rate, stalk breaking force of maize
stands for positive correlation. "-" stands for negative correlation.
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片表1不同春玉米品种不同播期的生育期进程
Table1.Growing stages of different spring maize cultivars sowed in different dates
| 品种 Variety | 起始时间(月-日)?Start date (month-day) | 历期?Duration (d) | |||||||
| 播种期 Sowing date | 拔节期 Jointing stage | 大喇叭口期 Big trumpet stage | 抽雄期 Tasselling stage | 生理成熟期 Physiological maturity stage | 播种—抽雄 Sowing to tasselling | 抽雄—生理成熟 Tasselling to physiological maturity | 全生育期 Whole growth season | ||
| 金科玉3306 JKY3306 | 04-16 | 05-29 | 06-21 | 07-04 | 09-06 | 79a | 64b | 143a | |
| 04-23 | 06-05 | 06-26 | 07-09 | 09-12 | 77ab | 65ab | 142a | ||
| 04-30 | 06-10 | 07-01 | 07-13 | 09-17 | 74b | 66ab | 140ab | ||
| 05-07 | 06-15 | 07-05 | 07-16 | 09-21 | 70c | 67ab | 137b | ||
| 05-14 | 06-19 | 07-08 | 07-18 | 09-24 | 65d | 68a | 133c | ||
| 平均值 Mean | 73a′ | 66a′ | 139b′ | ||||||
| 中地88 ZD88 | 04-16 | 05-29 | 06-21 | 07-05 | 09-10 | 80a | 67a | 147a | |
| 04-23 | 06-05 | 06-27 | 07-10 | 09-15 | 78ab | 67a | 145a | ||
| 04-30 | 06-11 | 07-02 | 07-14 | 09-21 | 75b | 69a | 144ab | ||
| 05-07 | 06-16 | 07-06 | 07-18 | 09-25 | 72bc | 69a | 141bc | ||
| 05-14 | 06-21 | 07-10 | 07-21 | 09-29 | 68c | 70a | 138c | ||
| 平均值 Mean | 75a′ | 68a′ | 143a′ | ||||||
| 显著性分析?Significance | |||||||||
| 品种?Cultivar (C) | ns | ns | * | ||||||
| 播期?Sowing date (S) | ** | * | ** | ||||||
| 互作?S×C | * | * | ** | ||||||
| 同列不同小写字母表示相同品种不同播期间在P < 0.05水平差异显著, “′”表示平均值间比较。**和*分别表示P < 0.01和P < 0.05显著水平, ns表示不显著。Values followed by different lowercase letters within a column are significantly different for the same cultivars at P < 0.05 level. Letters with “′” show comparison between averages. ** and * mean significant effects at P < 0.01 and P < 0.05 levels, respectively. ns means no significant effect. | |||||||||
下载: 导出CSV表2不同播期下不同春玉米品种的立秆期倒伏率
Table2.Stalk lodging rates of different spring maize cultivars sowed in different dates during grain dehydration period?
| 品种 Variety | 播种期(月-日) Sowing date (month-day) | 调查日期(月-日)?Investigation date (month-day) | |||
| 09-15 | 10-02 | 10-12 | 10-24 | ||
| 金科玉3306 JKY3306 | 04-16 | 0.7±1.1a | 0.7±1.1a | 0.7±1.1a | 0.7±1.1a |
| 04-23 | 0.0±0.0a | 0.0±0.0a | 0.0±0.0a | 0.0±0.0a | |
| 04-30 | 0.0±0.0a | 0.0±0.0a | 0.0±0.0a | 0.0±0.0a | |
| 05-07 | 0.0±0.0a | 0.0±0.0a | 0.0±0.0a | 0.0±0.0a | |
| 05-14 | 0.0±0.0a | 0.0±0.0a | 0.0±0.0a | 0.0±0.0a | |
| 平均值?Mean | 0.1a′ | 0.1b′ | 0.1b′ | 0.1b′ | |
| 中地88 ZD88 | 04-16 | 0.7±1.2a | 0.7±1.2bc | 3.4±4.4bc | 4.1±4.2bc |
| 04-23 | 0.0±0.0a | 0.0±0.0c | 1.3±2.3c | 1.3±2.3c | |
| 04-30 | 0.7±1.2a | 2.0±0.1b | 3.2±2.2c | 5.9±3.9bc | |
| 05-07 | 0.7±1.2a | 4.3±2.7a | 8.0±4.4ab | 9.8±7.4ab | |
| 05-14 | 0.0±0.0a | 5.3±1.4a | 10.8±7.0a | 11.8±6.0a | |
| 平均值?Mean | 0.4a′ | 2.4a′ | 5.4a′ | 6.6a′ | |
| 显著性分析?Significance | |||||
| 品种?Cultivar (C) | ns | ** | ** | ** | |
| 播期?Sowing date (S) | ns | ** | ns | ns | |
| 互作?S×C | ns | ** | ns | ns | |
| 同列不同小写字母表示相同品种不同播期间在P < 0.05水平差异显著, “′”表示平均值间比较。**和*分别表示P < 0.01和P < 0.05显著水平, ns表示不显著。Values followed by different lowercase letters within a column are significantly different for the same cultivars at P < 0.05 level. Letters with “′” show comparison between averages. ** and * mean significant effects at P < 0.01 and P < 0.05 levels, respectively. ns means no significant effect. | |||||
下载: 导出CSV表3玉米品种‘中地88’不同播期倒伏率随立秆时间延长的趋势线方程
Table3.Trend line equations of stalk lodging rate of maize cultivar 'ZD88' in different sowing date during grain dehydration period
| 播种期(月-日) Sowing date (month-day) | a | b | R2 | 显著性 Significance | 倒伏率≥5%的日期 Date of stalk lodging rate more than 5% |
| 04-16 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 0.7956 | ns | 11月后?After November |
| 04-23 | 0.04 | -0.16 | 0.7349 | ns | 11月后?After November |
| 04-30 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.9303 | * | 10月22日?October 22 |
| 05-07 | 0.24 | 0.65 | 0.9809 | ** | 10月4日?October 4 |
| 05-14 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 0.9459 | * | 9月30日?September 30 |
| *和**分别表示在P < 0.05和P < 0.01水平方程显著, ns表示方程不显著。* and ** mean significant equation at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 levels, respectively. ns means no significant equation. | |||||
下载: 导出CSV表4不同时期玉米植株倒伏率、抗折断力和茎腐病发病率相关性分析
Table4.Correlation coefficients among stalk lodging rate, breaking force and rot disease of maize at different periods
| 指标 Indicator | 调查日期 Investigated date (month-day) | 倒伏率?Stalk lodging rate | |||
| 09-15 | 10-02 | 10-12 | 10-24 | ||
| 倒伏率 Stalk lodging rate | 09-15 | 1.00 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| 10-02 | 0.17 | 1.00 | 0.91** | 0.93** | |
| 10-12 | 0.15 | 0.91** | 1.00 | 0.96** | |
| 10-24 | 0.16 | 0.93** | 0.96** | 1.00 | |
| 茎腐病发病率 Incidence of stalk rot disease | 09-15 | 0.64** | -0.04 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| 10-02 | 0.59** | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.19 | |
| 10-12 | 0.53** | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.12 | |
| 10-24 | 0.45* | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.10 | |
| 茎秆抗折断力 Stalk breaking force | 09-16 | -0.29 | -0.15 | -0.20 | -0.22 |
| 10-03 | -0.32 | -0.29 | -0.41* | -0.39* | |
| 10-23 | -0.14 | -0.44* | -0.50** | -0.52** | |
| *和**分别表示在P < 0.05和P < 0.01水平显著相关。* and ** mean significant correlations at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 levels, respectively. | |||||
下载: 导出CSV表5玉米各性状主成分的特征向量及贡献率
Table5.Eigenvectors and percentages of accumulated contribution of principal components of maize traits
| 性状?Trait | 主成分?Principal component | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 茎粗系数?Stem diameter coefficient | 0.313 | -0.206 | -0.291 |
| 穗位高系数?Ear height coefficient | -0.356 | 0.125 | 0.087 |
| 重心高度?Gravity center height | -0.346 | 0.297 | 0.201 |
| 第6节承重自重比(湿) Load to self fresh weight ratio of the sixth internode | 0.157 | 0.357 | -0.318 |
| 第3节节长?Third internode length | -0.367 | 0.054 | 0.199 |
| 第4节节长?Fourth internode length | -0.372 | 0.086 | 0.226 |
| 第3节单位长度湿重?Fresh weight per unit length of the third internode | 0.244 | 0.070 | 0.573 |
| 第3节单位长度干重?Dry weight per unit length of the third internode | 0.307 | -0.116 | 0.470 |
| 第4节单位长度干重?Dry weight per unit length of the fourth internode | 0.336 | -0.071 | 0.353 |
| 第3节抗弯折强度?Bending strength of the third internode | 0.195 | 0.605 | 0.024 |
| 第4节抗弯折强度?Bending strength of the fourth internode | 0.231 | 0.572 | -0.039 |
| 特征值?Eigen value | 5.813 | 1.864 | 1.704 |
| 贡献率?Contribution rate (%) | 52.850 | 16.943 | 15.495 |
| 累计贡献率?Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 52.850 | 69.793 | 85.287 |
| P | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
下载: 导出CSV表6不同春玉米品种在不同播期下的主要抗倒性状
Table6.Main lodging resistance traits of different spring maize cultivars sowed in different dates
| 品种 Variety | 播种期(月-日) Sowing date (month-day) | 穗位高系数 Ear height coefficient (%) | 重心高度 Gravity center height (cm) | 第3节节长 Third internode length (cm) | 第4节节长 Fourth internode length (cm) | 第3节单位长度湿重 Fresh weight per unit length of the third internode (g·cm-1) | 第4节单位长度干重 Dry weight per unit length of the fourth internode (g·cm-1) | 第3节抗弯折强度 Bending strength of the third internode (N) |
| 金科玉3306 JKY3306 | 04-16 | 35.9±0.4c | 72.8±5.1d | 12.1±0.3b | 12.7±0.7b | 1.8±0.5b | 1.0±0.2ab | 236.3±11.8bc |
| 04-23 | 35.3±0.5c | 80.0±7.6c | 12.3±1.9b | 13.1±1.7b | 2.1±0.2ab | 1.0±0.1ab | 229.1±11.4c | |
| 04-30 | 36.6±1.0c | 87.1±4.3b | 12.3±1.4b | 13.3±1.3b | 2.3±0.3a | 1.1±0.1a | 254.7±23.8ab | |
| 05-07 | 39.7±0.4b | 100.8±2.3a | 14.0±1.2ab | 15.5±1.4a | 1.9±0.2ab | 0.9±0.1b | 271.5±24.1a | |
| 05-14 | 41.4±0.5a | 103.3±4.6a | 14.3±0.7a | 15.4±0.7a | 1.9±0.0b | 1.0±0.1b | 224.2±14.3c | |
| 平均值?Mean | 37.8b′ | 88.8b′ | 13.0b′ | 14.0b′ | 2.0a′ | 1.0a′ | 243.2a′ | |
| 中地88 ZD88 | 04-16 | 38.5±1.1c | 87.3±4.4c | 13.8±1.6b | 14.5±2.9c | 2.1±0.5a | 1.0±0.1a | 205.2±2.3b |
| 04-23 | 37.8±1.3c | 93.3±6.5c | 15.0±1.3b | 16.1±1.2bc | 1.9±0.3ab | 0.9±0.2ab | 203.9±9.6b | |
| 04-30 | 41.4±2.4b | 107.2±3.0b | 15.2±2.0b | 16.8±2.1b | 1.8±0.3ab | 0.9±0.1ab | 291.1±7.3a | |
| 05-07 | 42.8±1.4ab | 115.4±4.9a | 17.5±1.6a | 19.4±0.1a | 1.7±0.2ab | 0.8±0.1bc | 208.7±19.8b | |
| 05-14 | 43.9±1.2a | 119.5±0.7a | 18.3±0.6a | 19.2±0.4a | 1.5±0.1b | 0.7±0.0c | 174.9±4.6c | |
| 平均值?Mean | 40.9a′ | 104.6a′ | 15.9a′ | 17.2a′ | 1.8a′ | 0.9b′ | 216.7b′ | |
| 显著性分析?Significance | ||||||||
| 品种?Cultivar (C) | * | * | * | * | ns | ** | * | |
| 播期?Sowing date (S) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ns | * | ** | |
| 互作?S×C | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ** | |
| 同列不同小写字母表示相同品种不同播期间在P < 0.05水平差异显著, “′”表示平均值间比较。**和*分别表示P < 0.01和P < 0.05显著水平, ns表示不显著。Values followed by different lowercase letters within a column are significantly different for the same cultivars at P < 0.05 level. Letters with “′” show comparison between averages. ** and * mean significant effects at P < 0.01 and P < 0.05 levels, respectively. ns means no significant effect. | ||||||||
下载: 导出CSV表7不同春玉米品种在不同播期下的产量及产量要素
Table7.Yield and yield components of different cultivars of spring maize sowed in different dates
| 品种 Variety | 播种期(月-日) Sowing date (month-day) | 生物产量 Biomass yield (kg·hm-2) | 经济产量 Economic yield (kg·hm-2) | 穗数 Spikes number (×104·hm-2) | 穗粒数 Kernel number per spike | 百粒重100-seed weight (g) |
| 金科玉3306 JKY3306 | 04-16 | 18 558.8±1507.1c | 11 545.1±930.8b | 7.0±0.1a | 498.8±19.4c | 31.7±2.3b |
| 04-23 | 18 657.6±929.8c | 12 329.1±510.5b | 7.2±0.0a | 492.8±22.5c | 32.2±0.7b | |
| 04-30 | 22 497.8±1529.7ab | 13 294.9±879.5a | 7.1±0.2a | 545.1±23.7b | 35.4±2.0a | |
| 05-07 | 23 687.0±1866.9a | 13 871.5±419.2a | 7.1±0.2a | 606.5±14.4a | 33.0±2.5b | |
| 05-14 | 21 360.7±555.4b | 13 611.4±596.9a | 7.3±0.1a | 590.3±11.7a | 29.2±0.8c | |
| 平均值?Mean | 20 952.4a′ | 12 930.4a′ | 7.2a′ | 546.7a′ | 32.3b′ | |
| 中地88 ZD88 | 04-16 | 19 042.0±365.8b | 10 807.9±812.3c | 7.0±0.2a | 481.8±2.2c | 33.6±1.3bc |
| 04-23 | 19 595.1±882.2b | 11 893.3±13.9b | 7.2±0.2a | 481.3±45.1c | 35.1±0.8ab | |
| 04-30 | 20 221.8±1508.0b | 12 715.4±671.6a | 7.1±0.3a | 506.0±42.6bc | 35.6±0.7a | |
| 05-07 | 24 265.4±1570.7a | 13 252.5±217.9a | 7.1±0.3a | 542.7±36.4a | 33.3±1.1bc | |
| 05-14 | 19 923.2±1857.6b | 11 545.9±589.8bc | 6.9±0.3a | 531.9±3.5ab | 32.5±0.1c | |
| 平均值?Mean | 20 609.5a′ | 12 043.0a′ | 7.1a′ | 508.7a′ | 34.0a′ | |
| 显著性分析?Significance | ||||||
| 品种?Cultivar (C) | ns | ns | ns | ns | * | |
| 播期?Sowing date (S) | ** | ** | ns | ** | ** | |
| 互作?S×C | * | * | ns | ns | ns | |
| 同列不同小写字母表示相同品种不同播期间在P < 0.05水平差异显著, “′”表示平均值间比较。**和*分别表示P < 0.01和P < 0.05显著水平, ns表示不显著。Values followed by different lowercase letters within a column are significantly different for the same cultivars at P < 0.05 level. Letters with “′” show comparison between averages. ** and * mean significant effects at P < 0.01 and P < 0.05 levels, respectively. ns means no significant effect. | ||||||
下载: 导出CSV参考文献
| [1] | 李少昆. 我国玉米机械粒收质量影响因素及粒收技术的发展方向[J]. 石河子大学学报: 自然科学版, 2017, 35(3): 265-272 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHZN201703001.htm LI S K. Factors affecting the quality of maize grain mechanical harvest and the development trend of grain harvest technology[J]. Journal of Shihezi University: Natural Science, 2017, 35(3): 265-272 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHZN201703001.htm |
| [2] | 李少昆, 王克如, 谢瑞芝, 等. 实施密植高产机械化生产实现玉米高产高效协同[J]. 作物杂志, 2016, (4): 1-6 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWZZ201604001.htm LI S K, WANG K R, XIE R Z, et al. Implementing higher population and full mechanization technologies to achieve high yield and high efficiency in maize production[J]. Crops, 2016, (4): 1-6 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWZZ201604001.htm |
| [3] | 耿爱军, 杨建宁, 张兆磊, 等. 国内外玉米收获机械发展现状及展望[J]. 农机化研究, 2016, (4): 251-257 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-188X.2016.04.052 GENG A J, YANG J N, ZHANG Z L, et al. Discuss about the current situation and future of corn harvest machinery about domestic and abroad[J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2016, (4): 251-257 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-188X.2016.04.052 |
| [4] | 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 21962-2008玉米收获机械技术条件[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008 General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, China National Standardization Management Committee. GB/T 21962-2008 Technical Requirements for Maize Combine Harvester[S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2008 |
| [5] | THOMISON P R, MULLEN R W, LIPPS R E, et al. Corn response to harvest date as affected by plant population and hybrid[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2011, 103(6): 1765-1772 doi: 10.2134/agronj2011.0147 |
| [6] | JOHNSON W H, LAMP B J, HENRY J E, et al. Corn harvesting performance at various dates[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1963, 6(3): 268-272 doi: 10.13031/2013.40887 |
| [7] | 薛军, 李璐璐, 谢瑞芝, 等. 倒伏对玉米机械粒收田间损失和收获效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(12): 1774-1781 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBZW201812006.htm XUE J, LI L L, XIE R Z, et al. Effect of lodging on maize grain losing and harvest efficiency in mechanical grain harvest[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(12): 1774-1781 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBZW201812006.htm |
| [8] | 薛军, 王群, 李璐璐, 等. 玉米生理成熟后倒伏变化及其影响因素[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(12): 1782-1792 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBZW201812007.htm XUE J, WANG Q, LI L L, et al. Changes of maize lodging after physiological maturity and its influencing factors[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(12): 1782-1792 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBZW201812007.htm |
| [9] | 薛军, 董朋飞, 胡树平, 等. 玉米倒伏对机械粒收损失的影响及倒伏减损收获技术[J/OL]. 玉米科学, 2019: 1-10. (2019-12-04)[2020-07-02]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/22.1201.S.20191204.1651.004.html XUE J, DONG P F, HU S P, et al. Effect of lodging on maize grain loss and loss reduction technology in mechanical grain harvest[J/OL]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2019: 1-10. (2019-12-04)[2020-07-02]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/22.1201.S.20191204.1651.004.html |
| [10] | 潘伟光, 巩志磊, 卢海阳. 农户玉米收获环节采用机械化的影响因素分析: 基于山东省的实证研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(14): 165-172 doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2713 PAN W G, GONG Z L, LU H Y. Factors analysis on producers' application of mechanized maize harvesting: based on empirical research of Shandong Province[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(14): 165-172 doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2713 |
| [11] | 薛军, 王克如, 谢瑞芝, 等. 玉米生长后期倒伏研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(10): 1845-1854 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.10.004 XUE J, WANG K R, XIE R Z, et al. Research progress of maize lodging during late stage[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(10): 1845-1854 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.10.004 |
| [12] | 李少昆, 王克如, 王延波, 等. 辽宁中部地区玉米机械粒收质量及其限制因素研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (3): 162-167 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWZZ201803026.htm LI S K, WANG K R, WANG Y B, et al. The quality of mechanical harvesting maize grain and its influencing factors in central Liaoning Province[J]. Crops, 2018, (3): 162-167 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWZZ201803026.htm |
| [13] | 宫帅, 郭正宇, 张中东, 等. 山西玉米子粒含水率与机械粒收收获质量的关系分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2018, 26(4): 63-67 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YMKX201804011.htm GONG S, GUO Z Y, ZHANG Z D, et al. Analysis of relationship between maize grain moisture content and quality of mechanical grain harvest in Shanxi[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2018, 26(4): 63-67 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YMKX201804011.htm |
| [14] | 李洪, 阎晓光, 王国梁, 等. 山西省春玉米机械粒收品种筛选与大田示范[J]. 玉米科学, 2018, 26(5): 117-122 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YMKX201805020.htm LI H, YAN X G, WANG G L, et al. Cultivars selection of high yield spring maize suitable for mchanical kernel harvest and field demonstration in Shanxi[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2018, 26(5): 117-122 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YMKX201805020.htm |
| [15] | 钮笑晓, 张洁, 姚宏亮, 等. 山西省玉米适籽粒直收品种筛选试验研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(24): 20-26 doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17040048 NIU X X, ZHANG J, YAO H L, et al. Selection of mechanical harvest maize varieties in Shanxi Province[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(24): 20-26 doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17040048 |
| [16] | 姜春霞, 杨柯, 张冬梅, 等. 山西中晚熟区春玉米宜粒收品种筛选试验[J]. 山西农业科学, 2019, 47(10): 1778-1782 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2019.10.21 JIANG C X, YANG K, ZHANG D M, et al. Study on mechanically harvesting maize cultivar selection in medium-late maturity region of Shanxi Province[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(10): 1778-1782 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2019.10.21 |
| [17] | 孙宏勇, 刘小京, 王金涛, 等. 品种和播期对华北春玉米产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(6): 837-846 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2018-0606&flag=1 SUN H Y, LIU X J, WANG J T, et al. Effects of sowing date and cultivar on grain yield and water use efficiency of spring maize in the North China Plain[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018, 26(6): 837-846 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2018-0606&flag=1 |
| [18] | 刘明, 陶洪斌, 王璞, 等. 播期对春玉米生长发育与产量形成的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2009, 17(1): 18-23 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2009104&flag=1 LIU M, TAO H B, WANG P, et al. Effect of sowing date on growth and yield of spring-maize[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2009, 17(1): 18-23 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2009104&flag=1 |
| [19] | 李向岭, 李从锋, 侯玉虹, 等. 不同播期夏玉米产量性能动态指标及其生态效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(6): 1074-1083 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNYK201206006.htm LI X L, LI C F, HOU Y H, et al. Dynamic characteristics of summer maize yield performance in different planting dates and its effect of ecological factors[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(6): 1074-1083 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNYK201206006.htm |
| [20] | 路海东, 薛吉全, 郝引川, 等. 播期对雨养旱地春玉米生长发育及水分利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(12): 1906-1914 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBZW201512017.htm LU H D, XUE J Q, HAO Y C, et al. Effects of sowing time on spring maize (Zea mays L. ) growth and water use efficiency in rainfed dryland[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015, 41(12): 1906-1914 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBZW201512017.htm |
| [21] | 徐田军, 吕天放, 赵久然, 等. 玉米籽粒灌浆特性对播期的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(8): 2513-2519 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYSB201608016.htm XU T J, LV T F, ZHAO J R, et al. Response of grain filling characteristics of maize to sowing date[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(8): 2513-2519 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYSB201608016.htm |
| [22] | 张镇涛, 杨晓光, 高继卿, 等. 气候变化背景下华北平原夏玉米适宜播期分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(17): 3258-3274 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.17.003 ZHANG Z T, YANG X G, GAO J Q, et al. Analysis of suitable sowing date for summer maize in North China Plain under climate change[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(17): 3258-3274 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.17.003 |
| [23] | 豆攀. 播期对川中丘区玉米生长发育及产量形成的影响[D]. 成都: 四川农业大学, 2017 DOU P. Effect of sowing date on growth an yield formation of maize in the hilly area of Sichuan[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2017 |
| [24] | 刘少坤. 播期和密度对登海618高产机理影响的研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2017 LIU S K. The study on the effect of sowing date and density on the high yield mechanism of Denghai 618[D]. Tai'an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2017 |
| [25] | 豆攀, 黄科程, 王兴龙, 等. 川中丘区不同玉米品种春、夏播茎秆抗倒特性研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(4): 162-168 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBNB201704028.htm DOU P, HUANG K C, WANG X L, et al. Study on stalk lodging resistant of different maize varieties in spring and summer[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2017, 32(4): 162-168 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBNB201704028.htm |
| [26] | 蒋文瑛. 播期和品种对冀东地区春玉米倒伏及产量的影响[D]. 秦皇岛: 河北科技师范学院, 2019 JIANG W Y. Effects of sowing date and variety on spring maize lodging and yield in eastern Hebei Province[D]. Qinhuangdao: Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology, 2019 |
| [27] | 刘胜群, 宋凤斌, 朱先灿, 等. 晚播对春玉米倒伏及茎秆力学特性的影响[J]. 土壤与作物, 2013, 2(3): 117-121 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRZW201303003.htm LIU S Q, SONG F B, ZHU X C, et al. Analysis of lodging and mechanical properties characterization of spring maize under late sowing dates[J]. Soil and Crop, 2013, 2(3): 117-121 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRZW201303003.htm |
| [28] | 高鑫, 高聚林, 于晓芳, 等. 高密植对不同类型玉米品种茎秆抗倒特性及产量的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2012, 20(4): 69-73 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2012.04.015 GAO X, GAO J L, YU X F, et al. Stalks Lodging-resistance characteristics and yield traits among different maize varieties under high close planting[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2012, 20(4): 69-73 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2012.04.015 |
| [29] | 王荣焕, 徐田军, 赵久然, 等. 播期和密度对玉米子粒机收主要性状的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2017, 25(3): 94-98 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YMKX201703018.htm WANG R H, XU T J, ZHAO J R, et al. Effects of sowing date and planting density on maize grain mechanical harvesting related traits[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2017, 25(3): 94-98 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YMKX201703018.htm |
| [30] | 王元东, 王荣焕, 张华生, 等. 不同播期对玉米品种京农科728产量及机收子粒相关性状的影响[J]. 中国种业, 2015, (9): 43-45 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWPZ201509020.htm WANG Y D, WANG R H, ZHANG H S, et al. Effects of different sowing dates on yield and mechanical harvesting kernel related traits of maize variety Jingnongke 728[J]. Journal of China Seed Industry, 2015, (9): 43-45 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWPZ201509020.htm |
| [31] | 王金涛, 董心亮, 肖宇, 等. 基于扩散理论的华北春玉米生理成熟后籽粒脱水过程分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(4): 545-557 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2020-0408&flag=1 WANG J T, DONG X L, XIAO Y, et al. Analysis of kernel dry down process after physiological maturity of spring maize based on diffusion theory in the North China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(4): 545-557 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2020-0408&flag=1 |
| [32] | 于吉琳. 播期与密度对玉米物质生产及产量的影响[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2013 YU J L. Effects of sowing date and density on matter production and yield formation in maize[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2013 |
| [33] | 张桂花. 不同播期、种植密度对先行5号玉米产量、品质和抗性的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2009, (12): 61-62 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4942.2009.12.016 ZHANG G H. Effects of different sowing dates and plant densities on yield, quality and resistance of maize cultivar Xianxing 5[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2009, (12): 61-62 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4942.2009.12.016 |
| [34] | 靳英杰, 李鸿萍, 安盼盼, 等. 玉米抗倒性研究进展[J]. 玉米科学, 2019, 27(2): 94-98 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YMKX201902013.htm JIN Y J, LI H P, AN P P, et al. Research progress on the lodging resistance of maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2019, 27(2): 94-98 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YMKX201902013.htm |
| [35] | 黄文辉, 王会, 梅德圣. 农作物抗倒性研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 13-19 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWZZ201804004.htm HUANG W H, WANG H, MEI D S. Research progress on lodging resistance of crops[J]. Crops, 2018, (4): 13-19 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWZZ201804004.htm |
| [36] | 勾玲, 黄建军, 张宾, 等. 群体密度对玉米茎秆抗倒力学和农艺性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(10): 1688-1695 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.10.019 GOU L, HUANG J J, ZHANG B, et al. Effects of population density on stalk lodging resistant mechanism and agronomic characteristics of maize[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007, 33(10): 1688-1695 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.10.019 |
| [37] | 刘晓林, 马晓君, 豆攀, 等. 种植密度对川中丘陵夏玉米茎秆性状及产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(3): 356-364 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20170306&flag=1 LIU X L, MA X J, DOU P, et al. Effect of planting density on stem characteristics and yield of summer maize in the Hilly Central Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(3): 356-364 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20170306&flag=1 |
| [38] | 郑云霄, 刘文斯, 赵永锋, 等. 玉米种质资源的抗倒伏性评价及鉴定指标筛选[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(6): 1588-1596 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWYC201906029.htm ZHENG Y X, LIU W S, ZHAO Y F, et al. Evaluation of lodging resistance and selection of identi?cation indexes of maize germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2019, 20(6): 1588-1596 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWYC201906029.htm |
| [39] | 黄璐, 乔江方, 刘京宝, 等. 夏玉米不同密植群体抗倒性及机收指标探讨[J]. 华北农学报, 2015, 30(2): 198-201 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBNB201502035.htm HUANG L, QIAO J F, LIU J B, et al. Research on the relationship between maize lodging resistance and grain mechanically harvesting qualities in different planting density[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2015, 30(2): 198-201 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBNB201502035.htm |
| [40] | LIU S Q, SONG F B, LIU F L, et al. Effect of planting density on root lodging resistance and its relationship to nodal root growth characteristics in maize (Zea mays L. )[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2012, 4(12): 182-189 http://www.oalib.com/paper/2920075 |
