删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

水肥管理及生物炭施用对作物产量和磷效率及磷淋失的影响

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

卢慧宇,
杜文婷,
张弘弢,
徐佳星,
韩燕,
郑景瑞,
王仁杰,
杨学云,
张树兰,
西北农林科技大学资源环境学院/农业部西北植物营养与环境重点实验室 杨凌 712100
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目2016YFD0800105

详细信息
作者简介:卢慧宇, 主要从事养分管理研究。E-mail:1223650765@qq.com
通讯作者:张树兰, 主要从事农田水肥管理研究。E-mail:zhangshulan@nwafu.edu.cn
中图分类号:S151+.22

计量

文章访问数:265
HTML全文浏览量:2
PDF下载量:445
被引次数:0
出版历程

收稿日期:2020-06-28
录用日期:2020-09-24
刊出日期:2021-01-01

Effects of water and nutrient management and biochar application on crop yield, phosphorus use efficiency, and phosphorus leaching

LU Huiyu,
DU Wenting,
ZHANG Hongtao,
XU Jiaxing,
HAN Yan,
ZHENG Jingrui,
WANG Renjie,
YANG Xueyun,
ZHANG Shulan,
College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University/Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Agro-environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling 712100, China
Funds: the National Key Research and Development Program of China2016YFD0800105

More Information
Corresponding author:ZHANG Shulan, E-mail: zhangshulan@nwafu.edu.cn


摘要
HTML全文
(4)(1)
参考文献(39)
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件(0)
访问统计

摘要
摘要:为探讨中国北方褐土区典型种植模式——冬小麦-夏玉米体系水分优化、养分优化以及生物炭施用对作物产量、磷效率和磷素淋失的影响,2016—2019年于陕西杨凌土(黄土母质,自然褐土发育)区进行田间渗漏池试验,设计习惯水肥(CP1、CP2,CP1处理渗漏池深为120~150 cm,CP2处理渗漏池深为100 cm)、灌水优化(CP1-W)、养分优化(CP1-F)、水分养分优化(OPT)、习惯水肥+生物炭(CP2+B)以及水分养分优化+生物炭(OPT+B)7个处理,研究作物产量、磷肥偏生产力和磷素淋失的响应。结果表明,CP1-W、CP1-F和OPT处理3年平均冬小麦、夏玉米及作物总产量均与CP1处理无显著差异。CP1-F和OPT处理较CP1处理均显著增加磷肥偏生产力,平均增幅分别为69.3%和56.4%。与CP1处理相比,CP1-W和CP1-F均没有显著影响各形态磷的淋失量,而OPT处理的颗粒磷淋失量显著减少58.4%。施用生物炭对3年平均作物总产量无显著影响,而在CP2+B处理磷肥偏生产力显著提高43.6%;在OPT+B处理磷肥偏生产力无显著变化。CP2+B处理各形态磷素的淋失量均与CP2处理相似,OPT+B处理第1年可溶性有机磷、颗粒磷和总磷淋失量较OPT处理分别显著降低60.0%、57.1%和62.4%,但后两年OPT+B处理总磷淋失量却显著增加。综合3年的结果发现,在不同条件下施用生物炭对各形态磷素淋失均无显著影响。上述结果表明,褐土区在农户水肥的基础上合理降低水肥用量,可以提高磷肥利用率,降低磷素淋失量,保障作物产量;而施用冬小麦秸秆生物炭对作物产量、磷素淋失无显著影响,对磷肥偏生产力的影响结果不一致,有待进一步研究。
关键词:冬小麦-夏玉米体系/
水肥调控/
生物炭/
作物产量/
磷肥偏生产力/
磷素淋失
Abstract:Excessive water and chemical fertilizer application is often reported in North China winter wheat-summer maize rotation systems, resulting in economic losses and environmental issues. Therefore, optimizing water and nutrients (e.g., P) for crop yield is important. A 3-year field lysimeter experiment was performed on Lou soil (loess-derived and developed on natural cinnamon soil) in Yangling, Shaanxi Province, Northwest China, to investigate P use efficiency and P leaching of winter wheat-summer maize rotation systems in cinnamon soil. Seven treatments were used to investigate crop yield, P partial productivity (PFPP), and P leaching: conventional practices (CP1, lysimeter depth = 120–150 cm; CP2, lysimeter depth = 100 cm), CP1 plus reduced water supply (CP1-W), CP1 plus reduced nutrient supply (CP1-F), CP1 plus reduced water and nutrient supplies (OPT), CP2 plus biochar application (CP2+B), and OPT plus biochar application (OPT+B). The results showed that the mean wheat, maize, and total wheat + maize yields were similar among CP1, CP1-W, CP1-F, and OPT. Compared with CP1, CP1-F and OPT significantly increased PFPP by an average of 69.3% and 56.4%, respectively. CP1-W and CP1-F did not affect P leaching, but annual particulate phosphorus leaching decreased significantly under OPT treatment (by 58.4%). Biochar use did not affect the mean annual crop yield, but CP2+B significantly increased PFPP (by 43.6%) compared with CP2. OPT-B did not affect PFPP compared with OPT. Each year, all forms of leached P were similar between CP2 and CP2+B. In the first treatment year, OPT+B significantly decreased (compared with OPT) the dissolved organic phosphorus, particulate phosphorus, and total phosphorus (TP) leaching losses by 60.0%, 57.1%, and 62.4%, respectively, but TP leaching increased significantly in the following 2 years. The 3-year average showed that biochar application did not affect P loss. Therefore, only reducing water and fertilizer applications to cinnamon soil may improve P use efficiency and reduce P leaching while maintaining crop yield. Applying wheat straw biochar did not affect crop yield or P leaching, and the effect on PFPP was inconsistent. Further studies are needed to clarify the effectiveness of biochar application.
Key words:Winter wheat-summer maize rotation system/
Water and fertilizer optimization/
Biochar/
Crop yield/
Partial factor productivity of phosphorus/
P leaching loss

HTML全文


图12016—2019年水肥管理和施用生物炭对冬小麦和夏玉米产量以及总产量的影响
各处理含义见表 1。不同小写字母表示不同处理同一年度差异显著(P < 0.05)。
Figure1.Effects of water and nutrient management or biochar application on crops yields of winter wheat-summer maize rotation system in 2016—2019
The meaning of each treatment was shown in the table 1. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different treatments in the same year (P < 0.05).


下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片


图22016—2019年水肥管理(A)以及生物炭(B)对冬小麦-夏玉米轮作体系磷肥偏生产力的影响
各处理含义见表 1。不同小写字母表示不同处理同一年度差异显著(P < 0.05)。
Figure2.Effects of water and nutrient management (A) or biochar application (B) on partial factor productivity of phosphorus (PFPP) of winter wheat-summer maize rotation system in 2016–2019
The meaning of each treatment was shown in the table 1. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different treatments in the same year (P < 0.05).


下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片


图32016—2019年水肥管理(A)以及生物炭(B)对冬小麦-夏玉米轮作体系中累积渗漏液量的影响
各处理含义见表 1。不同小写字母表示不同处理同一年度差异显著(P < 0.05)。
Figure3.Effects of water and nutrient management (A) and biochar application (B) on cumulative leachate of winter wheat-summer maize rotation system in 2016–2019
The meaning of each treatment was shown in the table 1. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different treatments in the same year (P < 0.05).


下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片


图42016—2019年水肥管理以及生物炭对冬小麦-夏玉米轮作年磷素淋失量的影响
DOP:可溶性有机磷; MRP:钼酸盐反应磷; PP:颗粒磷。图柱内小写字母表示不同处理间DOP或MRP或PP淋失量差异显著(P < 0.05), 图柱上方不同大写字母表示不同处理总磷淋失量差异显著(P < 0.05)。
Figure4.Effects of water and nutrient management and biochar application on phosphorus leaching loss of winter wheat-summer maize rotation system in 2016–2019
DOP: soluble organic phosphorus; MRP: molybdate-reaction phosphorus; PP: particulate phosphorus. Different lowercase letters in the bars represent significant differences in DOP or MRP or PP leaching losses among the treatments (P < 0.05), different capital letters above the bars represent significant differences in total phosphorus leaching loss among different treatments (P < 0.05)


下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表12016—2019年不同处理灌水及氮磷肥和生物炭施用量
Table1.Application rates of water, fertilizer and biochar in different treatments during 2016—2019
处理
Treatment
年份
Year
渗漏池深
Depth of lysimeter (cm)
冬小麦Winter wheat 夏玉米Summer maize
N
(kg·hm-2)
P2O5
(kg·hm-2)
灌溉量
Irrigation
(mm)
生物炭
Biochar
(t·hm-2)
N
(kg·hm-2)
P2O5
(kg·hm-2)
灌溉量
Irrigation
(mm)
生物炭
Biochar
(t·hm-2)
CP1 2016—2017 120~150 210 180 170 0 280 45 230 0
2017—2018 120~150 210 180 150 0 280 45 120 0
2018—2019 120~150 210 180 140 0 280 45 40 0
CP1-W 2016—2017 120~150 210 180 130 0 280 45 180 0
2017—2018 120~150 210 180 120 0 280 45 90 0
2018—2019 120~150 210 180 120 0 280 45 30 0
CP1-F 2016—2017 120~150 150 120 170 0 180 0 230 0
2017—2018 120~150 150 120 150 0 180 0 120 0
2018—2019 120~150 150 120 140 0 180 0 40 0
OPT 2016—2017 120~150 150 120 130 0 180 0 180 0
2017—2018 120~150 150 120 120 0 180 0 90 0
2018—2019 120~150 150 120 120 0 180 0 30 0
OPT+B 2016—2017 200 150 120 130 15 180 0 180 0
2017—2018 200 150 120 120 15 180 0 90 0
2018—2019 200 150 120 120 0 180 0 30 0
CP2 2016—2017 100 210 180 170 0 280 45 230 0
2017—2018 100 210 180 150 0 280 45 120 0
2018—2019 100 210 180 140 0 280 45 40 0
CP2+B 2016—2017 100 210 180 170 15 280 45 230 0
2017—2018 100 210 180 150 15 280 45 120 0
2018—2019 100 210 180 140 0 280 45 40 0


下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(39)
[1]TINKER P B. Economy and chemistry of phosphorus[J]. Nature, 1977, 270(5633):103-104 doi: 10.1038/270103a0
[2]GILBERT N. The disappearing nutrient (vol 461, pg 716, 2009)[J]. Nature, 2009, 461(7267):1041
[3]孙志立.重新认识磷矿加工的科学合理性实施循环经济可持续发展战略[J].化肥工业, 2013, 40(2):1-5 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7779.2013.02.001
SUN L Z. Understanding a new scientific rationality of phosphate rock processing and implementation of strategy for sustainable development of cyclic economy[J]. Chemical Fertilizer Industry, 2013, 40(2):1-5 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7779.2013.02.001
[4]VITOUSEK P M, NAYLOR R, CREWS T, et al. Nutrient imbalances in agricultural development[J]. Science, 2009, 324(5934):1519-1520 doi: 10.1126/science.1170261
[5]常艳丽, 刘俊梅, 李玉会, 等.陕西关中平原小麦/玉米轮作体系施肥现状调查与评价[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2014, 42(8):51-61 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBNY201408010.htm
CHANG Y L, LIU J M, LI Y H, et al. Investigation and evaluation of fertilization under winter wheat and summer maize rotation system in Guanzhong Plain[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University:Natural Science Edition, 2014, 42(8):51-61 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBNY201408010.htm
[6]陈磊, 郝明德, 张少民.黄土高原长期施肥对小麦产量及肥料利用率的影响[J].麦类作物学报, 2006, 26(5):101-105 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1041.2006.05.023
CHEN L, HAO M D, ZHANG S M. Effect of long-term application of fertilizer on wheat yield and fertilizer use efficiency in Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2006, 26(5):101-105 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1041.2006.05.023
[7]HECKRATH G, BROOKES P C, POULTON P R, et al. Phosphorus leaching from soils containing different phosphorus concentrations in the broadbalk experiment[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1995, 24(5):904-910
[8]SHARPLEY A, BEEGLE D, BOLSTER C, et al. Phosphorus indices:Why we need to take stock of how we are doing[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2012, 41(6):1711-1719 doi: 10.2134/jeq2012.0040
[9]张经纬, 曹文超, 严正娟, 等.种植年限对设施菜田土壤剖面磷素累积特征的影响[J].农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(5):977-983 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NHBH201205021.htm
ZHANG J W, CAO W C, YAN Z J, et al. Effects of cropping years on the characteristics of phosphorus accumulation in soil profiles under greenhouse vegetable production[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2012, 31(5):977-983 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NHBH201205021.htm
[10]CIAPPARELLI I C, DE IORIO A F, GARCíA A R. Phosphorus downward movement in soil highly charged with cattle manure[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(7):568 doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-5284-3
[11]KHAN A, LU G Y, AYAZ M, et al. Phosphorus efficiency, soil phosphorus dynamics and critical phosphorus level under long-term fertilization for single and double cropping systems[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2018, 256:1-11
[12]赵建博, 李晔, 邵啸.施磷对香溪河黄棕壤磷素淋失的影响研究[J].工业安全与环保, 2016, 42(5):12-15 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-425X.2016.05.004
ZHAO J B, LI Y, SHAO X. Effects of phosphorus fertilizer application on phosphorus leaching of yellow-brown soil in Xiangxi River[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2016, 42(5):12-15 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-425X.2016.05.004
[13]项大力, 杨学云, 孙本华, 等.灌溉水平对土磷素淋失的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(1):112-117 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWYF201506005.htm
XIANG D L, YANG X Y, SUN B H, et al. Impacts of irrigation regimes on phosphorus leaching in manural loessial soil[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2010, 16(1):112-117 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWYF201506005.htm
[14]BUTTERLY C R, MCNEILL A M, BALDOCK J A, et al. Changes in water content of two agricultural soils does not alter labile P and C pools[J]. Plant and Soil, 2011, 348(1/2):185-201
[15]LIANG B, LEHMANN J, SOLOMON D, et al. Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2006, 70(5):1719-1730 doi: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0383
[16]张伟.论述生物炭对土壤肥料作用及未来发展[J].黑龙江科技信息, 2015, (24):264 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1328.2015.24.249
ZHANG W. Discuss the effect of biochar on soil fertilizer and its future development[J]. Heilongjiang Science and Technology Information, 2015, (24):264 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1328.2015.24.249
[17]UZOMA K C, INOUE M, ANDRY H, et al. Effect of cow manure biochar on maize productivity under sandy soil condition[J]. Soil Use and Management, 2011, 27(2):205-212 doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00340.x
[18]JEFFERY S, VERHEIJEN F G A, VELDE M V D, et al. A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2011, 144(1):175-187
[19]LAIRD D, FLEMING P, WANG B Q, et al. Biochar impact on nutrient leaching from a Midwestern agricultural soil[J]. Geoderma, 2010, 158(3/4):436-442
[20]尹俊慧, 李小英.不同类型生物炭混施对土壤磷素淋失的影响试验研究[J].中国农学通报, 2019, 35(6):32-36 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNTB201906006.htm
YIN J H, LI X Y. Different types of biochar mixed additions affect soil phosphorus leaching loss:experimental research[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(6):32-36 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNTB201906006.htm
[21]王承俊, 杨放, 邢英, 等.生物炭对干旱区盐碱土磷淋溶的影响[J].四川环境, 2017, 36(2):17-21 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3644.2017.02.004
WANG C J, YANG F, XING Y, et al. Effect of biochar on phosphorus leaching from saline soil in arid area[J]. Sichuan Environment, 2017, 36(2):17-21 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3644.2017.02.004
[22]李江舟, 张庆忠, 娄翼来, 等.施用生物炭对云南烟区典型土壤养分淋失的影响[J].农业资源与环境学报, 2015, 32(1):48-53 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NHFZ201501009.htm
LI J Z, ZHANG Q Z, LOU Y L, et al. Effects of biochar addition on nutrient leaching loss of typical tobacco-planting soils in Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2015, 32(1):48-53 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NHFZ201501009.htm
[23]项大力, 杨学云, 孙本华, 等.土壤深度对土磷素淋失的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(6):1439-1447 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWYF201506005.htm
XIANG D L, YANG X Y, SUN B H, et al. Impacts of soil depths on phosphorus leaching losses in manural loessial soil[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2010, 16(6):1439-1447 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWYF201506005.htm
[24]胡宏祥, 汪玉芳, 陈祝, 等.秸秆还田配施化肥对黄褐土氮磷淋失的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2015, 29(5):101-105 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQS201505019.htm
HU H X, WANG Y F, CHEN Z, et al. Effects of straw return with chemical fertilizer on nitrogen and phosphorus leaching from yellow cinnamon soil[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 29(5):101-105 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQS201505019.htm
[25]JU X T, XING G X, CHEN X P, et al. Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, 106(9):3041-3046 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813417106
[26]刘小利, 蔡铁, 徐悦, 等.关中西部灌区限量节水灌溉对冬小麦水分利用效率和产量的影响[J].节水灌溉, 2018, (1):24-29 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4929.2018.01.006
LIU X L, CAI T, XU Y, et al. Effect of limited water-saving irrigation on winter wheat water use efficiency and yield in Guanzhong Irrigation District[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2018, (1):24-29 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4929.2018.01.006
[27]LIU X Y, ZHANG A F, JI C Y, et al. Biochar's effect on crop productivity and the dependence on experimental conditions-a meta-analysis of literature data[J]. Plant and Soil, 2013, 373(1/2):583-594
[28]高海英, 何绪生, 陈心想, 等.生物炭及炭基硝酸铵肥料对土壤化学性质及作物产量的影响[J].农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(10):1948-1955 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NHBH201210015.htm
GAO H Y, HE X S, CHEN X X, et al. Effect of biochar and biochar-based ammonium nitrate fertilizers on soil chemical properties and crop yield[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2012, 31(10):1948-1955 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NHBH201210015.htm
[29]ASAI H, SAMSON B K, STEPHAN H M. Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos:1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield[J]. Field Crops Research, 2009, 111(1/2):81-84
[30]DEMIRBAS A. Effects of temperature and particle size on bio-char yield from pyrolysis of agricultural residues[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2004, 72(2):243-248 doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2004.07.003
[31]宋延静, 龚骏.施用生物质炭对土壤生态系统功能的影响[J].鲁东大学学报:自然科学版, 2010, 26(4):361-365 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8020.2010.04.016
SONG Y J, GONG J. Effects of biochar application on soil ecosystem functions[J]. Ludong University Journal:Natural Science Edition, 2010, 26(4):361-365 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8020.2010.04.016
[32]张翠荣, 吕家珑, 潘杨, 等.冬麦不同施磷水平下土壤磷素淋溶试验[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2007, 25(3):105-109 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7601.2007.03.022
ZHANG C R, LYU J L, PAN Y, et al. Simulate of winter wheat phosphorus leaching in potted plant[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2007, 25(3):105-109 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7601.2007.03.022
[33]GAO S, DELUCA T H, CLEVELAND C C. Biochar additions alter phosphorus and nitrogen availability in agricultural ecosystems:A meta-analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 654:463-472 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.124
[34]YAO Y, GAO B, ZHANG M, et al. Effect of biochar amendment on sorption and leaching of nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate in a sandy soil[J]. Chemosphere, 2012, 89(11):1467-1471 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.06.002
[35]GLASER B, LEHMANN J, ZECH W. Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal-a review[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2002, 35(4):219-230 doi: 10.1007/s00374-002-0466-4
[36]李江舟, 娄翼来, 张立猛, 等.不同生物炭添加量下植烟土壤养分的淋失[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(4):1075-1080 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWYF201504028.htm
LI J Z, LOU Y L, ZHANG L M, et al. Leaching loss of nutrients in tobacco-planting soil under different biochar adding levels[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2015, 21(4):1075-1080 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWYF201504028.htm
[37]RIVERA-UTRILLA J, BAUTISTA-TOLEDO I, FERRO-GARCíA M A, et al. Activated carbon surface modifications by adsorption of bacteria and their effect on aqueous lead adsorption[J]. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2001, 76(12):1209-1215 doi: 10.1002/jctb.506
[38]NOVAK J M, BUSSCHER W J, LAIRD D L, et al. Impact of biochar amendment on fertility of a southeastern coastal plain soil[J]. Soil Science, 2009, 174(2):105-112 doi: 10.1097/SS.0b013e3181981d9a
[39]李卓瑞, 韦高玲.不同生物炭添加量对土壤中氮磷淋溶损失的影响[J].生态环境学报, 2016, 25(2):333-338 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRYJ201602023.htm
LI Z R, WEI G L. Effects of biochar with different additive amounts on the leaching loss of nitrogen and phosphorus in soils[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2016, 25(2):333-338 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRYJ201602023.htm

相关话题/生物 作物 管理 土壤 优化