江春艳,
胡跃高,
王小芬,
中国农业大学农学院 北京 100193
基金项目: 大同黄芪专项2019001
详细信息
作者简介:高游慧, 主要研究方向为中药材高值研发。E-mail: 1322358406@qq.com
通讯作者:王小芬, 主要研究方向为中药材高值研发。E-mail: wxiaofen@cau.edu.cn
中图分类号:S345计量
文章访问数:636
HTML全文浏览量:5
PDF下载量:580
被引次数:0
出版历程
收稿日期:2020-07-31
录用日期:2020-12-31
刊出日期:2021-03-01
Effects of different fertilizer treatments on nutrient absorption and distribution in organic Astragalus
GAO Youhui,JIANG Chunyan,
HU Yuegao,
WANG Xiaofen,
College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Funds: the Special Project of Astragalus of Datong2019001
More Information
Corresponding author:WANG Xiaofen, E-mail: wxiaofen@cau.edu.cn
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要
摘要:黄芪是我国大宗中药材的典型代表，目前对于有机黄芪养分需求及施肥管理措施研究较少，且符合有机种植的有机肥、矿物肥、微生物肥配施鲜有报道。本文通过田间试验研究了不施肥（CK）、化肥（C）、有机肥（O）、有机肥+矿物肥（OM）、有机肥+矿物肥+微生物肥（OMD）等5个肥料处理对有机黄芪各器官中氮、磷、钾、钙、镁、铁、锰、铜、锌等9种矿质养分元素吸收、积累、分配的影响。结果表明：在黄芪生长期内，黄芪各器官中9种矿质元素的含量动态因肥料处理不同而存在差异。黄芪根系各元素积累规律均呈现逐渐增加的趋势，茎叶中各元素呈现先升高后降低的积累动态趋势。5种肥料对比分析发现，单施化肥能促进黄芪茎叶对养分的吸收。而有机肥+矿物肥+微生物肥（OMD）能显著促进黄芪根系对氮、钾、铁、锰、铜、锌的吸收和积累，促进茎叶对磷的吸收和积累；与其他处理相比促进了9种养分向茎叶的分配，为黄芪地上部生长提供更多营养。总体而言，有机肥+矿物肥+微生物肥（OMD处理）能有效促进黄芪对多种矿质养分元素的积累与分配，这可能是该处理下有机黄芪高产优质的生理基础。
关键词:有机黄芪/
肥料处理/
养分吸收/
有机肥/
微生物肥
Abstract:Milkvetch (Astragalus membranaceus) is a staple herbal medicine in China. Few studies have investigated the nutrient requirements and fertilization management of organic milkvetch, and there are only a few reports on the proportioning and application of organic, mineral, and microbial fertilizers, which conform with organic cultivation. In this study, Mongolian milkvetch (Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus) was subjected to five treatments: no fertilizer (CK), chemical fertilizer (C), organic fertilizer (O), organic fertilizer + mineral fertilizer (OM), and organic fertilizer + mineral fertilizer + microbial fertilizer (OMD). The effects of different fertilizer treatments on the absorption, accumulation, and allocation of nine mineral nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron, manganese, copper, and zinc) were systematically studied in the organs of organic Mongolian milkvetch. The results showed that the contents of nine mineral elements in various organs of Mongolian milkvetch varied with different fertilizer treatments. The accumulation of various elements in the roots of Mongolian milkvetch showed a gradually increasing trend, and the elements in the stems and leaves showed a dynamic trend, increasing at first and then decreasing. The application of chemical fertilizer effectively promoted the accumulation of iron, manganese, copper, and zinc in the stems and leaves of Mongolian milkvetch. Organic fertilizer combined with mineral and microbial fertilizers significantly promoted the accumulation of nitrogen, potassium, iron, manganese, copper, and zinc in the roots and promoted the accumulation of phosphorus in the stems and leaves. During the 180-day growth period after transplanting, organic fertilizer combined with mineral and microbial fertilizers performed best in all fertilization treatments. Compared with other treatments, the OMD treatment promoted the distribution of nine nutrients to the stems and leaves and provided more nutrients for growth. In summary, organic fertilizer combined with mineral and microbial fertilizers can effectively promote the accumulation and allocation of mineral nutrients in Mongolian milkvetch. This may represent the physiological basis for high yield and high-quality organic Mongolian milkvetch. However, the physiological mechanisms need further study.
Key words:Organic milkvetch/
Fertilizer treatment/
Nutrient absorption/
Organic fertilizer/
Microbial fertilizer
HTML全文
图1不同肥料处理对黄芪各器官氮磷钾素积累量的影响
CK: 不施肥; C: 施1500 kg·hm-2复合肥; O: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥; OM: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥和750 kg·hm-2矿物肥; OMD: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥、750 kg·hm-2矿物肥和75 kg·hm-2微生物肥。CK: non fertilization; C: applying 1500 kg·hm-2 compound fertilizer; O: applying 32 143 kg·hm-2 organic fertilizer; OM: O plus 750 kg·hm-2 mineral fertilizer; OMD: OM plus 75 kg·hm-2 microbial fertilizer.
Figure1.Effects of different fertilizer treatments on nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium accumulation in different organs of Mongolian milkvetch
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图2不同肥料处理对黄芪各器官钙镁素积累量的影响
CK: 不施肥; C: 施1500 kg·hm-2复合肥; O: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥; OM: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥和750 kg·hm-2矿物肥; OMD: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥、750 kg·hm-2矿物肥和75 kg·hm-2微生物肥。CK: non fertilization; C: applying 1500 kg·hm-2 compound fertilizer; O: applying 32 143 kg·hm-2 organic fertilizer; OM: O plus 750 kg·hm-2 mineral fertilizer; OMD: OM plus 75 kg·hm-2 microbial fertilizer.
Figure2.Effects of different fertilizer treatments on calcium, magnesium accumulation in different organs of Mongolian milkvetch
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图3不同肥料处理对黄芪各器官铁锰铜锌积累量的影响
CK: 不施肥; C: 施1500 kg·hm-2复合肥; O: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥; OM: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥和750 kg·hm-2矿物肥; OMD: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥、750 kg·hm-2矿物肥和75 kg·hm-2微生物肥。CK: non fertilization; C: applying 1500 kg·hm-2 compound fertilizer; O: applying 32 143 kg·hm-2 organic fertilizer; OM: O plus 750 kg·hm-2 mineral fertilizer; OMD: OM plus 75 kg·hm-2 microbial fertilizer.
Figure3.Effect of different fertilizer treatments on iron, manganese, copper and zinc accumulation in different organs of Mongolian milkvetch
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图4不同肥料处理对黄芪各器官氮磷钾素分配的影响
CK: 不施肥; C: 施1500 kg·hm-2复合肥; O: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥; OM: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥和750 kg·hm-2矿物肥; OMD: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥、750 kg·hm-2矿物肥和75 kg·hm-2微生物肥。CK: non fertilization; C: applying 1500 kg·hm-2 compound fertilizer; O: applying 32 143 kg·hm-2 organic fertilizer; OM: O plus 750 kg·hm-2 mineral fertilizer; OMD: OM plus 75 kg·hm-2 microbial fertilizer.
Figure4.Effects of different fertilizer treatments on nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium distribution in different organs of Mongolian milkvetch
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图5不同肥料处理对黄芪各器官钙、镁素分配的影响
CK: 不施肥; C: 施1500 kg·hm-2复合肥; O: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥; OM: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥和750 kg·hm-2矿物肥; OMD: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥、750 kg·hm-2矿物肥和75 kg·hm-2微生物肥。CK: non fertilization; C: applying 1500 kg·hm-2 compound fertilizer; O: applying 32 143 kg·hm-2 organic fertilizer; OM: O plus 750 kg·hm-2 mineral fertilizer; OMD: OM plus 75 kg·hm-2 microbial fertilizer.
Figure5.Effects of different fertilizer treatments on calcium, magnesium distribution in different organs of Mongolian milkvetch
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图6不同肥料处理对黄芪各器官铁锰铜锌分配的影响
CK: 不施肥; C: 施1500 kg·hm-2复合肥; O: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥; OM: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥和750 kg·hm-2矿物肥; OMD: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥、750 kg·hm-2矿物肥和75 kg·hm-2微生物肥。CK: non fertilization; C: applying 1500 kg·hm-2 compound fertilizer; O: applying 32 143 kg·hm-2 organic fertilizer; OM: O plus 750 kg·hm-2 mineral fertilizer; OMD: OM plus 75 kg·hm-2 microbial fertilizer.
Figure6.Effects of different fertilizer treatments on iron, manganese, copper and zinc distribution in different organs of Mongolian milkvetch
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片表1不同肥料处理对黄芪各器官氮磷钾含量的影响
Table1.Effects of different fertilizer treatments on nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in different organs of Mongolian milkvetch?
| 元素 Element | 器官 Organ | 处理 Treatment | 移栽天数Days of transplanting (d) | ||||
| 30 | 65 | 90 | 125 | 180 | |||
| 氮 Nitrogen | 根系 Root | CK | 21.00±0.24ab | 13.79±0.08b | 13.89±0.20ab | 21.81±0.05a | 24.40±0.27a |
| C | 23.80±0.23a | 16.31±0.15a | 11.19±0.15b | 19.47±0.00a | 27.30±0.37a | ||
| O | 19.90±0.04ab | 14.89±0.07b | 14.48±0.07ab | 15.71±0.18b | 24.15±0.09a | ||
| OM | 20.39±0.27ab | 13.73±0.03b | 13.82±0.03ab | 15.12±0.19b | 24.43±0.15a | ||
| OMD | 16.37±0.13b | 14.17±0.05b | 16.16±0.05a | 15.56±0.18b | 21.92±0.31a | ||
| 茎叶 Stem and leaf | CK | 18.52±0.26bc | 27.55±0.28b | 25.51±0.28a | 18.33±0.08b | — | |
| C | 45.49±0.29a | 31.79±0.10a | 22.82±0.10a | 20.22±0.11ab | — | ||
| O | 12.45±0.27c | 31.53±0.14a | 26.58±0.14a | 22.78±0.10a | — | ||
| OM | 25.34±0.37b | 31.17±0.15ab | 26.00±0.15a | 21.91±0.15a | — | ||
| OMD | 48.83±0.43a | 29.94±0.03ab | 27.38±0.03a | 22.89±0.23a | — | ||
| 磷 Phosphorus | 根系 Root | CK | 1.00±0.02c | 1.63±0.00b | 1.59±0.01b | 1.46±0.01ab | 1.97±0.04a |
| C | 2.11±0.01a | 1.64±0.02b | 1.52±0.01b | 1.73±0.03ab | 1.95±0.03a | ||
| O | 1.34±0.02b | 2.03±0.02a | 1.93±0.02a | 1.93±0.02a | 2.18±0.02a | ||
| OM | 1.54±0.01b | 1.67±0.01b | 2.06±0.02a | 1.85±0.02a | 1.88±0.02a | ||
| OMD | 1.41±0.00b | 1.57±0.01b | 1.30±0.01b | 1.28±0.02b | 1.75±0.01a | ||
| 茎叶 Stem and leaf | CK | 3.25±0.05b | 2.94±0.03b | 3.21±0.01ab | 2.59±0.03a | — | |
| C | 5.10±0.07a | 3.70±0.03a | 2.78±0.04b | 2.22±0.02a | — | ||
| O | 4.44±0.04ab | 3.97±0.03a | 3.30±0.01ab | 2.39±0.03a | — | ||
| OM | 5.42±0.05a | 3.41±0.02ab | 3.53±0.02a | 2.06±0.01a | — | ||
| OMD | 5.02±0.08a | 2.86±0.02b | 3.45±0.02a | 2.08±0.02a | — | ||
| 钾 Potassium | 根系 Root | CK | 5.73±0.03a | 5.67±0.07ab | 7.05±0.05b | 4.83±0.02ab | 7.79±0.02a |
| C | 5.12±0.02ab | 6.62±0.01a | 10.52±0.01a | 5.16±0.01a | 7.49±0.04a | ||
| O | 4.06±0.03c | 4.79±0.03bc | 9.92±0.02a | 4.29±0.02cd | 8.21±0.08a | ||
| OM | 4.58±0.01bc | 5.68±0.01ab | 4.39±0.03c | 4.67±0.03bc | 7.36±0.00a | ||
| OMD | 5.91±0.07a | 4.27±0.06c | 4.85±0.05c | 3.93±0.01d | 7.98±0.08a | ||
| 茎叶 Stem and leaf | CK | 18.36±0.05a | 13.89±0.09b | 6.70±0.11a | 10.94±0.16a | — | |
| C | 19.07±0.14a | 21.22±0.20a | 18.12±0.25a | 10.96±0.03a | — | ||
| O | 18.59±0.14a | 24.78±0.29a | 18.55±0.17a | 10.95±0.09a | — | ||
| OM | 21.18±0.18a | 23.25±0.15a | 19.69±0.16a | 10.98±0.01a | — | ||
| OMD | 21.38±0.08a | 20.69±0.17a | 17.45±0.09a | 10.26±0.08a | — | ||
| CK: 不施肥; C: 施1500 kg·hm-2复合肥; O: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥; OM: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥和750 kg·hm-2矿物肥; OMD: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥、750 kg·hm-2矿物肥和75 kg·hm-2微生物肥。同列同一元素同一器官不同小写字母表示P < 0.05水平下不同处理间差异显著。CK: non fertilization; C: applying 1500 kg·hm-2 compound fertilizer; O: applying 32 143 kg·hm-2 organic fertilizer; OM: O plus 750 kg·hm-2 mineral fertilizer; OMD: OM plus 75 kg·hm-2 microbial fertilizer. Means of different treatments of the same element and organ followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different at P < 0.05. | |||||||
下载: 导出CSV表2不同肥料处理对黄芪各器官钙镁含量的影响
Table2.Effects of different fertilizer treatments on calcium and magnesium contents in different organs of Mongolian milkvetch?
| 元素 Element | 器官 Organ | 处理 Treatment | 移栽天数Days of transplanting (d) | ||||
| 30 | 65 | 90 | 125 | 180 | |||
| 钙 Calcium | 根系 Root | CK | 4.05±0.01abc | 3.83±0.03a | 4.87±0.07a | 3.05±0.04a | 2.86±0.02a |
| C | 3.95±0.05bc | 3.94±0.03a | 4.43±0.03a | 3.07±0.04a | 2.64±0.01ab | ||
| O | 4.37±0.09ab | 3.89±0.03a | 4.65±0.09a | 3.24±0.03a | 2.71±0.01ab | ||
| OM | 3.02±0.01c | 3.80±0.03a | 2.69±0.01b | 3.52±0.04a | 2.32±0.02b | ||
| OMD | 5.08±0.07a | 3.54±0.03a | 3.14±0.02b | 3.45±0.06a | 3.02±0.01a | ||
| 茎叶 Stem and leaf | CK | 10.29±0.13b | 16.25±0.25a | 14.27±0.19a | 8.33±0.09a | — | |
| C | 9.79±0.04b | 16.65±0.07a | 5.27±0.09d | 8.48±0.12a | — | ||
| O | 13.46±0.04a | 8.44±0.05b | 8.91±0.03b | 7.77±0.04a | — | ||
| OM | 10.57±0.11b | 11.19±0.27b | 6.07±0.04cd | 6.45±0.10a | — | ||
| OMD | 10.69±0.12b | 7.46±0.04b | 7.77±0.03bc | 6.44±0.07a | — | ||
| 镁 Magnesium | 根系 Root | CK | 2.60±0.02ab | 2.29±0.00ab | 2.33±0.01ab | 2.44±0.01a | 1.81±0.02a |
| C | 2.48±0.01ab | 2.57±0.01a | 2.43±0.01ab | 1.68±0.02b | 1.89±0.03a | ||
| O | 2.43±0.00b | 2.24±0.00ab | 2.59±0.01a | 1.95±0.03b | 2.05±0.02a | ||
| OM | 2.29±0.03b | 2.12±0.02b | 2.27±0.03ab | 2.39±0.03a | 1.86±0.01a | ||
| OMD | 2.87±0.01a | 2.11±0.02b | 2.00±0.02b | 1.98±0.01b | 1.96±0.02a | ||
| 茎叶 Stem and leaf | CK | 3.50±0.03a | 3.08±0.05a | 3.32±0.01a | 1.74±0.01a | — | |
| C | 2.87±0.02a | 3.08±0.03a | 2.91±0.02b | 1.64±0.03ab | — | ||
| O | 3.37±0.05a | 2.91±0.02a | 2.36±0.00c | 1.55±0.01ab | — | ||
| OM | 3.15±0.01a | 3.06±0.02a | 2.33±0.01c | 1.21±0.01c | — | ||
| OMD | 3.27±0.02a | 3.16±0.03a | 2.39±0.02c | 1.37±0.00bc | — | ||
| CK: 不施肥; C: 施1500 kg·hm-2复合肥; O: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥; OM: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥和750 kg·hm-2矿物肥; OMD: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥、750 kg·hm-2矿物肥和75 kg·hm-2微生物肥。同列同一元素同一器官不同小写字母表示P < 0.05水平下不同处理间差异显著。CK: non fertilization; C: applying 1500 kg·hm-2 compound fertilizer; O: applying 32 143 kg·hm-2 organic fertilizer; OM: O plus 750 kg·hm-2 mineral fertilizer; OMD: OM plus 75 kg·hm-2 microbial fertilizer. Means of different treatments of the same element and organ followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different at P < 0.05. | |||||||
下载: 导出CSV表3不同肥料处理对黄芪各器官铁锰铜锌含量的影响
Table3.Effects of different fertilizer treatments on iron, manganese, copper and zinc contents in different organs of Mongolian milkvetch?
| 元素 Element | 器官 Organ | 处理 Treatment | 移栽天数Days of transplanting (d) | ||||
| 30 | 65 | 90 | 125 | 180 | |||
| 铁 Iron | 根系 Root | CK | 781.16±46.33a | 367.76±48.75c | 1443.42±19.42ab | 1632.66±69.90a | 243.69±5.07ab |
| C | 423.17±44.86c | 799.17±131.67b | 1460.78±164.08ab | 839.36±112.86d | 132.50±1.91c | ||
| O | 515.12±146.79bc | 926.38±232.89b | 1627.80±102.13a | 1136.70±64.30bc | 271.62±59.71a | ||
| OM | 280.06±38.08d | 1623.64±175.51a | 1234.65±196.99b | 1278.38±232.35b | 172.70±10.30bc | ||
| OMD | 608.39±68.51b | 496.11±35.47c | 902.94±11.2c | 972.13±31.87cd | 218.69±65.98ab | ||
| 茎叶 Stem and leaf | CK | 265.23±1.86cd | 397.40±41.81bc | 942.53±7.67a | 204.04±22.62b | — | |
| C | 218.15±26.71d | 446.21±24.85b | 491.29±20.09bc | 253.80±35.72ab | — | ||
| O | 357.09±29.19b | 549.24±27.97a | 556.02±52.76b | 283.35±33.64a | — | ||
| OM | 425.38±27.12a | 349.22±16.57c | 407.52±53.24c | 238.46±30.65ab | — | ||
| OMD | 294.12±16.02c | 372.15±13.14c | 201.44±33.34d | 197.61±31.02b | — | ||
| 锰 Manganese | 根系 Root | CK | 38.41±0.84b | 43.59±2.57c | 75.44±2.36a | 50.07±2.46a | 27.49±1.03a |
| C | 39.05±2.75b | 58.08±6.69abc | 67.85±9.98a | 27.21±1.74c | 23.81±0.72ab | ||
| O | 32.15±0.06bc | 66.54±7.90a | 63.40±8.44a | 35.67±2.86b | 23.65±3.02ab | ||
| OM | 30.22±0.52c | 63.04±5.55ab | 26.65±1.54b | 31.64±0.29bc | 20.71±2.95b | ||
| OMD | 52.44±1.83a | 50.21±4.65bc | 28.98±1.18b | 36.84±3.61b | 21.65±0.64b | ||
| 茎叶 Stem and leaf | CK | 54.96±5.76a | 51.62±7.33b | 68.20±3.40b | 49.19±0.33ab | — | |
| C | 56.66±4.97a | 62.17±5.86ab | 105.58±3.51a | 58.93±4.39a | — | ||
| O | 65.11±0.81a | 70.79±5.05a | 69.13±2.96b | 48.82±5.61ab | — | ||
| OM | 62.20±2.19a | 53.34±3.52b | 65.41±8.35b | 45.43±3.26bc | — | ||
| OMD | 65.71±7.49a | 60.33±6.64ab | 58.87±7.80b | 37.83±4.52c | — | ||
| 铜 Copper | 根系 Root | CK | 1.92±0.13bc | 2.98±0.61ab | 6.10±1.20ab | 5.74±0.13ab | 5.42±0.13b |
| C | 3.84±0.37a | 3.15±0.76ab | 4.11±0.31b | 5.24±0.49b | 6.47±0.67ab | ||
| O | 0.73±0.02c | 3.78±0.25a | 4.19±0.43b | 7.47±0.63a | 7.48±0.96a | ||
| OM | 3.02±0.96ab | 1.89±0.64b | 6.24±1.11a | 6.26±1.67ab | 7.18±0.91a | ||
| OMD | 4.19±0.85a | 3.19±0.86ab | 5.12±0.78ab | 5.53±0.60ab | 7.19±0.14a | ||
| 茎叶 Stem and leaf | CK | 9.90±1.02b | 8.41±0.51a | 8.56±0.68b | 5.10±0.11b | — | |
| C | 11.21±0.37a | 7.99±0.57a | 12.63±0.16a | 6.14±0.16a | — | ||
| O | 8.73±0.20c | 8.72±0.44a | 8.46±0.56b | 5.54±0.54b | — | ||
| OM | 9.03±0.14bc | 6.71±0.37b | 7.12±0.33c | 5.24±0.13b | — | ||
| OMD | 8.31±0.09c | 8.16±0.39a | 6.53±0.14c | 5.37±0.07b | — | ||
| 锌 Zinc | 根系 Root | CK | 19.31±3.19b | 26.29±1.60ab | 17.36±2.71a | 12.01±2.18c | 32.69±8.17a |
| C | 32.74±7.19a | 32.59±7.27a | 14.70±1.68ab | 23.51±3.68ab | 39.92±7.39a | ||
| O | 24.50±4.34ab | 18.93±3.13bc | 18.11±1.37a | 27.90±0.90a | 27.00±0.84a | ||
| OM | 20.57±4.71b | 13.42±3.38c | 14.55±0.52ab | 17.23±4.78bc | 38.35±3.43a | ||
| OMD | 20.19±3.74b | 15.27±0.94c | 12.26±1.28b | 22.67±5.72ab | 40.73±7.32a | ||
| 茎叶 Stem and leaf | CK | 57.89±4.73a | 76.59±11.26a | 73.66±5.63a | 51.73±9.44a | — | |
| C | 62.87±8.07a | 63.53±8.27a | 61.33±5.96b | 32.48±6.47b | — | ||
| O | 60.88±3.65a | 82.16±4.24a | 72.90±0.48a | 23.34±1.84b | — | ||
| OM | 74.61±10.92a | 80.02±14.07a | 50.36±1.21c | 24.80±3.06b | — | ||
| OMD | 71.76±8.20a | 73.23±6.59a | 40.98±4.42d | 29.38±3.59b | — | ||
| CK: 不施肥; C: 施1500 kg·hm-2复合肥; O: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥; OM: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥和750 kg·hm-2矿物肥; OMD: 施32 143 kg·hm-2有机肥、750 kg·hm-2矿物肥和75 kg·hm-2微生物肥。同列同一元素同一器官不同小写字母表示P < 0.05水平下不同处理间差异显著。CK: non fertilization; C: applying 1500 kg·hm-2 compound fertilizer; O: applying 32 143 kg·hm-2 organic fertilizer; OM: O plus 750 kg·hm-2 mineral fertilizer; OMD: OM plus 75 kg·hm-2 microbial fertilizer. Means of different treatments of the same element and organ followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different at P < 0.05. | |||||||
下载: 导出CSV参考文献
| [1] | 马雪松, 赵金海, 隋月梅. 黄芪的营养成分测定及保健功能研究[J]. 黑龙江科学, 2018, 9(22): 44-45 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HELJ201822019.htm MA X S, ZHAO J H, SUI Y M. Determination of nutritional components and health function of Astragalus membranaceus[J]. Heilongjiang Science, 2018, 9(22): 44-45 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HELJ201822019.htm |
| [2] | 张艳, 周庆民, 徐馨, 等. 黄芪茎叶药物成分及营养成分测定[J]. 中国草食动物科学, 2016, 36(5): 32-35 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3887.2016.05.008 ZHANG Y, ZHOU Q M, XU X, et al. Determination of medicinal compositions and nutritional compositions in stems and leaves of Astragalus[J]. China Herbivore Science, 2016, 36(5): 32-35 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3887.2016.05.008 |
| [3] | 杨宏昕, 张春霞, 魏慧, 等. 黄芪栽培研究进展[J]. 临床合理用药杂志, 2015, (2): 180-181 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-PLHY201502141.htm YANG H X, ZHANG C X, WEI H, et al. Research progress of Astragalus cultivation[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use, 2015, (2): 180-181 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-PLHY201502141.htm |
| [4] | 秦雪梅, 李震宇, 孙海峰, 等. 我国黄芪药材资源现状与分析[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2013, 38(19): 3234-3238 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZY201319003.htm QIN X M, LI Z Y, SUN H F, et al. Status and analysis of Astragali Radix resource in China[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2013, 38(19): 3234-3238 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZY201319003.htm |
| [5] | 周鹏, 胡明勋, 李浩飞, 等. 不同品种、产地和种植方式黄芪药材中黄酮类成分的质量分析[J]. 中国药房, 2016, 27(18): 2575-2578 doi: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2016.18.43 ZHOU P, HU M X, LI H F, et al. Quality analysis of flavonoids in Astragali Radix from different variety, origins and planting mode[J]. Chinese Pharmacy, 2016, 27(18): 2575-2578 doi: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2016.18.43 |
| [6] | 林丽, 杨扶德, 李硕, 等. 甘肃7个不同产地蒙古黄芪质量的比较研究[J]. 湖南中医药大学学报, 2009, 29(4): 24-26 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-070X.2009.04.008 LIN L, YANG F D, LI S, et al. Quality comparison of Radix Astragali from seven regions of Gansu[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine University of Hunan, 2009, 29(4): 24-26 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-070X.2009.04.008 |
| [7] | 廖兴国, 郭圣茂, 陈兰兰, 等. 不同施肥处理对桔梗生长特性和药材产量的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 2014, 32(2): 110-113 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8981.2014.02.022 LIAO X G, GUO S M, CHEN L L, et al. Effects of different fertilization treatments on growth characteristics and medicinal material yield in Platycodon grandilforum[J]. Nonwood Forest Research, 2014, 32(2): 110-113 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8981.2014.02.022 |
| [8] | 吴世福. 施肥对金银花药材产量与质量影响的研究[D]. 济南: 山东中医药大学, 2003 WU S F. Study on effects of fertilization on yield and quality of flos lonicerae[D]. Ji'nan: Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2003 |
| [9] | 范铭, 曹爱农, 晋小军, 等. 施肥对陇中半干旱区三年生甘草产量和品质的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(12): 175-180 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH201612028.htm FAN M, CAO A N, JIN X J, et al. The effect of fertilization on yield and quality of triennial licorice in semiarid regions of Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016, 30(12): 175-180 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH201612028.htm |
| [10] | 宋庆燕. 氮磷钾配施对黄芪产量和质量的影响[D]. 北京: 北京中医药大学, 2017 SONG Q Y. Effects of combined application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on the yield and quality of Astragalus[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 2017 |
| [11] | 杨军衡. 天然药物在医疗及食品中的应用探讨[J]. 中国林副特产, 2019, (2): 76-78 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CTFL201902035.htm YANG J H. Discussion on the application of natural drugs in medicine and food[J]. Forest by-Product and Speciality in China, 2019, (2): 76-78 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CTFL201902035.htm |
| [12] | 王丹, 侯俊玲, 万春阳, 等. 中药材施肥研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 2011, 42(1): 225-228 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRTB201101048.htm WANG D, HOU J L, WAN C Y, et al. Progress of fertilization on Chinese medicinal materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2011, 42(1): 225-228 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRTB201101048.htm |
| [13] | 郭亚勤, 刘德辉, 迟传德. 施肥对丹参产量及丹参根主要有效成分含量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2007, 38(3): 523-526 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRTB200703022.htm GUO Y Q, LIU D H, CHI C D. Effects of fertilization on the yield and active constituents of cultivated Salvia miltiorrhiza[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2007, 38(3): 523-526 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRTB200703022.htm |
| [14] | 郭亚勤. 有机肥料对栽培丹参的生长和丹参酮类物质累积的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2007 GUO Y Q. Effect of organic fertilizers on growth and accumulation of tanshinones of Salvia miltiorrhiza[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2007 |
| [15] | 陈美兰, 申业, 杨光, 等. 中药渣有机肥对丹参的促生作用以及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2016, 46(11): 1296-1303 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCXK201611006.htm CHEN M L, SHEN Y, YANG G, et al. Effect of herb residue compost on growth and physiological properties of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bge., and soil enzyme activity[J]. Science China: Life Sciences, 2016, 46(11): 1296-1303 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCXK201611006.htm |
| [16] | 丁丹丹, 李西文, 陈士林, 等. 优质中药材栽培合理施肥探讨[J]. 世界科学技术-中医药现代化, 2018, 20(7): 1114-1122 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJKX201807010.htm DING D D, LI X W, CHEN S L, et al. Study on rational fertilization of high quality Chinese herbal medicines[J]. World Science and Technology-Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2018, 20(7): 1114-1122 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJKX201807010.htm |
| [17] | 曾波, 何忠俊, 毛昆明, 等. 药用植物施肥研究进展[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2007, 22(4): 587-592 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YNDX200704027.htm ZENG B, HE Z J, MAO K M, et al. Current progress of fertilization in Chinese Herbs[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University, 2007, 22(4): 587-592 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YNDX200704027.htm |
| [18] | 高游慧. 不同肥料处理对黄芪有机生产的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2019 GAO Y H. Effects of different fertilizer treatments on organic production of Astragalus[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2019 |
| [19] | 赵欢, 杨仁德, 李剑, 等. 蚯蚓粪与尿素配施对中药白花前胡养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2016, 29(9): 2167-2171 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNYX201609027.htm ZHAO H, YANG R D, LI J, et al. Effects of earthworm cast and urea combined application on yield, nutrient uptake and nitrogen use efficiency of Peucedamum praeruptorum[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 29(9): 2167-2171 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNYX201609027.htm |
| [20] | 潘超美, 詹若挺, 丁平, 等. 不同有机肥对巴戟天生长及矿质养分吸收的影响[J]. 中药材, 2002, 25(10): 699-701 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYCA200210001.htm PAN C M, ZHAN R T, DING P, et al. Effects of various organic fertilizers on growth and mineral nutrient absorption of Morindar officialis[J]. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, 2002, 25(10): 699-701 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYCA200210001.htm |
| [21] | 贾蕾. 中等土壤肥力水平下祁白芷的肥料效应及养分积累规律[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2006 JIA L. Fertilizer effect and nutrient accumulation rule of Angelica dahurica in normal soil nutrient condition[D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2006 |
| [22] | 韩彦龙, 晋凡生, 郑普山, 等. 红芸豆养分限制因子及养分吸收、积累和分配特征研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(7): 902-909 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTN201607007.htm HAN Y L, JIN F S, ZHENG P S, et al. Nutrient restrictive factors, nutrient absorption and accumulation of red kidney bean[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(7): 902-909 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTN201607007.htm |
| [23] | 韦美丽, 陈中坚, 魏富刚, 等. 磷肥用量对三七生物量及养分分配影响研究[J]. 特产研究, 2020, 42(4): 28-36 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TCYA202004007.htm WEI M L, CHEN Z J, WEI F G, et al. Effects of phosphorus levels on biomass and nutrients distribution of Panax notoginseng[J]. Special Wild Economic Animal and Plant Research, 2020, 42(4): 28-36 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TCYA202004007.htm |
