薛银鑫,
张倩,
周佳瑞,
买晓凤,
穆志梅
宁夏大学农学院 银川 750021
基金项目: 宁夏回族自治区重点研发项目2019BBF02007
详细信息
通讯作者:刘根红, 主要研究方向为作物栽培与耕作学。E-mail: liu_genhong@163.com
中图分类号:S344.3计量
文章访问数:189
HTML全文浏览量:3
PDF下载量:305
被引次数:0
出版历程
收稿日期:2020-04-24
录用日期:2020-07-01
刊出日期:2021-03-01
Determining suitable vegetables for planting after spring wheat harvest in the Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area
LIU Genhong,,XUE Yinxin,
ZHANG Qian,
ZHOU Jiarui,
MAI Xiaofeng,
MU Zhimei
College of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
Funds: the Key Research and Development Project of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region2019BBF02007
More Information
Corresponding author:LIU Genhong, E-mail: liu_genhong@163.com
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要
摘要:复种是提高土地利用率及保证区域粮食安全的重要措施之一，宁夏引黄灌区近年来农业区域气候资源变化趋向利于多熟制，研究筛选春小麦复种蔬菜的适宜种类成为区域农作制度发展的必然。本试验选择灌区具有生产潜力的17种蔬菜与春小麦复种，运用层次分析方法（AHP），设3个2级指标，12个3级指标，通过对各模式相应评价指标测定及分析，筛选适于灌区的麦后复种蔬菜的两熟制模式。结果表明：近10年来，灌区年≥10℃积温3407.9℃，降水量206.4 mm，无霜期208.4 d，蒸发量1619.3 mm。主要气候因子理论上可以满足麦后复种叶菜类和根菜类蔬菜，但与理论生产潜力相比较，实际产量的提升空间较大；麦后复种果菜类的气候资源不足。17种蔬菜中，春小麦复种的白萝卜、满堂红萝卜、娃娃菜、黄瓜（‘626’）4种蔬菜资源利用效率较高；春小麦复种的胡萝卜、白萝卜、芹菜、西红柿（‘丰收128’）4种蔬菜提升地力效果较好；春小麦复种娃娃菜、白萝卜、满堂红萝卜、小辣椒（‘娇龙7号’）4种蔬菜经济效益较高。综合评价，得出适宜宁夏引黄灌区春小麦后复种的8种蔬菜为：娃娃菜、白萝卜、满堂红萝卜、辣椒（‘娇龙7号’）、辣椒（‘洋大帅’）、苦苣、芹菜和西葫芦，分别比综合效益最低的小麦-苤蓝种植模式高143.0%、121.5%、77.7%、46.3%、43.0%、35.5%、33.1%和33.0%，可大面积推广。
关键词:春小麦/
蔬菜/
复种/
宁夏引黄灌区
Abstract:Multiple cropping is important for improving land use and ensuring regional food security. Climate change in the Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area in recent years favors a multiple-cropping system. Thus, a hierarchical analysis (AHP) with three secondary indicators and twelve three-level indicators was used to determine the vegetable crops that could be planted after spring wheat harvest based on the climate. By doing so, a double-cropping system could be implemented in the Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area. In the irrigation area over the past ten years, the annual accumulated temperature ≥ 10 ℃ was 3407.9 ℃, the annual precipitation was 206.4 mm, and the annual evaporation was 1619.3 mm. These climatic conditions are sufficient for leaf and root vegetables cropping after spring wheat harvest. Compared with the theoretical production potential, the actual yield had room for improvement; the conditions were insufficient for fruit vegetable crops after spring wheat harvest. Among 17 vegetable species (varieties) planted after spring wheat, four had higher use efficiency (turnip, mantanghong, baby cabbage, and cucumber), four improved soil fertility (carrot, turnip, celery, and tomato), and four had higher economic benefits [baby cabbage, turnip, mantanghong, and pepper (Jiaolong 7)]. AHP evaluation showed that eight vegetables were suitable for planting after spring wheat harvest based on their comprehensive benefits: baby cabbage, turnip (white turnip), turnip (mantanghong), pepper (Jiaolong 7), pepper (Yangdashuai), endive, celery, and squash (33.0%); they had 143.0%, 121.5%, 77.7%, 46.3%, 43.0%, 35.5%, 33.1% and 33.0% higher comprehensive benefits than kohlrabi. These eight vegetables can be widely cultivated across the area.
Key words:Spring wheat/
Vegetable/
Multiple cropping/
Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area
HTML全文
图1宁夏引黄灌区2010—2019年不同地区年降雨量和≥10 ℃积温
Figure1.Rainfall and accumulated temperature above 10 ℃ in different areas of Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area from 2010 to 2019
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图2宁夏引黄灌区各蔬菜类型综合评价的层次模式
Figure2.Hierarchical model of comprehensive evaluation of different vegetables planted after spring wheat in Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片表1宁夏引黄灌区2010—2019年主要气象资料
Table1.Main meteorological data of Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area from 2010 to 2019
| 年份 Year | 无霜期 Frost-free period (d) | 降水量 Rainfall (mm) | 年蒸发量 Evaporation (mm) | 初霜日(月-日) Day of early frost (month-day) | ≥0℃积温 Accumulated temperature above 0℃(℃) | ≥10℃积温 Accumulated temperature above 10℃(℃) |
| 2010 | 196 | 168.9 | 1661.2 | 10-26 | 4064.0 | 3304.0 |
| 2011 | 223 | 188.7 | 1617.7 | 10-14 | 4055.2 | 3295.2 |
| 2012 | 190 | 295.1 | 1718.4 | 10-17 | 4044.4 | 3284.4 |
| 2013 | 189 | 148.3 | 1685.7 | 10-16 | 4307.4 | 3547.4 |
| 2014 | 227 | 196.1 | 1629.2 | 11-03 | 4180.7 | 3420.7 |
| 2015 | 200 | 195.5 | 1631.1 | 10-29 | 4114.3 | 3354.3 |
| 2016 | 216 | 241.9 | 1598.2 | 10-29 | 4257.7 | 3497.7 |
| 2017 | 218 | 205.3 | 1537.6 | 10-30 | 4218.8 | 3458.8 |
| 2018 | 210 | 249.8 | 1487.7 | 10-25 | 4269.5 | 3509.5 |
| 2019 | 215 | 174.6 | 1638.2 | 11-05 | 4167.5 | 3407.5 |
| 平均 Average | 208.4 | 206.42 | 1619.3 | 10-20 | 4167.9 | 3407.9 |
下载: 导出CSV表2宁夏引黄灌区春小麦后种植不同蔬菜所需积温、生长日数
Table2.Accumulated temperature, days of growth for different vegetables planted after spring wheat in Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area
| 蔬菜类型 Vegetable types | ≥10℃积温 Accumulated temperature above 10℃(℃) | 生长日数 Number of growth days (d) |
| 叶菜类Leafy vegetables | 2600~2800 | 180~220 |
| 果菜类Fruity vegetables | 4000~4200 | 230~260 |
| 根菜类bRoot vegetables | 3000~3200 | 180~220 |
下载: 导出CSV表3宁夏引黄灌区春小麦后种植的不同蔬菜的光合生产潜力、实际产量以及实际产量与理论产量比值
Table3.Photosynthetic productivity potential, actual production, ratio of actual yield to theoretical production of different vegetables planted after spring wheat in Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area
| 作物 Crop | 作物系数 Crop coefficient | 温度订正系数 Temperature correction coefficient | 收获指数 Harvest index | 生长日数 Growth days (d) | 光合生产潜力 Photosynthetic productivity potential (kg·hm-2) | 实际产量 Actual yield (kg·hm-2) | 实际占理论比率 Ratio of actual yield to theoretical production (%) |
| 辣椒Pepper | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 110.0 | 77 656.5 | 33 223.5 | 42.8 |
| 黄瓜Cucumber | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 110.0 | 77 656.5 | 41 118.0 | 52.9 |
| 西葫芦Marrow squash | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 110.0 | 116 485.5 | 33 952.5 | 29.1 |
| 西红柿Tomato | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 110.0 | 77 656.5 | 35 364.0 | 45.5 |
| 西兰花Broccoli | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 110.0 | 182 722.5 | 22 335.0 | 12.2 |
| 娃娃菜Baby cabbage | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 110.0 | 182 722.5 | 53 280.0 | 29.2 |
| 莲花菜Cauliflower | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 90.0 | 149 500.5 | 22 950.0 | 15.4 |
| 芹菜Celery | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 90.0 | 149 500.5 | 20 862.0 | 14.0 |
| 生菜Lettuce | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 90.0 | 149 500.5 | 17 742.0 | 11.9 |
| 苦苣Endive | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 110.0 | 182 722.5 | 33 660.0 | 18.4 |
| 苤蓝Brassica | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 110.0 | 182 722.5 | 27 949.5 | 15.3 |
| 胡萝卜Carrot | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 110.0 | 91 360.5 | 15 336.0 | 16.8 |
| 满堂红Mantanghong | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 110.0 | 182 722.5 | 54 642.0 | 29.9 |
| 白萝卜Turnip | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 110.0 | 182 722.5 | 58 386.0 | 32.0 |
下载: 导出CSV表4宁夏引黄灌区各蔬菜类型综合评价模型2级评价层相对于目标层的相对重要性的判断矩阵
Table4.Judgment matrix of the relative importance of evaluation layer relative to target layer of different vegetables planted after spring wheat in Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area
| A | B1 | B2 | B3 | 权重Weight |
| B1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 0.65 |
| B2 | 1/3 | 1 | 5 | 0.28 |
| B3 | 1/7 | 1/5 | 1 | 0.07 |
| λmax=3.05, CI1=0.02, RI1=0.52, CR1=0.04 < 0.10。 | ||||
下载: 导出CSV表5宁夏引黄灌区各蔬菜类型综合评价模型3级评价层相对于目标层的重要性的判断矩阵
Table5.Judgment matrix of the relative importance of the three-level evaluation layer of resource utilization benefit compared with the target layer of different vegetables planted after spring wheat in Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area
| 资源利用效率B1 Resource utilization benefit B1 | 经济效益B2 Economic benefits B2 | 地力提升B3 Soil fertility improvement B3 | |||||||||||||||||
| C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | 权重Weight | B2 | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | 权重Weight | C9 | C10 | C11 | C12 | 权重Weight | ||||
| C1 | 1 | 2 | 1/4 | 1/5 | 0.11 | C5 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 0.57 | C9 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0.54 | ||
| C2 | 1/2 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/6 | 0.10 | C6 | 1/5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0.20 | C10 | 1/5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.21 | ||
| C3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0.42 | C7 | 1/3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.08 | C11 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | 0.16 | ||
| C4 | 5 | 5 | 1/2 | 1 | 0.37 | C8 | 1/6 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 0.08 | C12 | 1/4 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1 | 0.09 | ||
| B1: λmax=4.33, CI2=0.01, RI2=0.9, CR2=0.01 < 0.10; B2: λmax=4.08, CI3=0.03, RI3=0.9, CR3=0.03 < 0.10; B3: λmax=4.18, CI4=0.06, RI3=0.9, RI3=0.07 < 0.10 | |||||||||||||||||||
下载: 导出CSV表6宁夏引黄灌区麦后复种蔬菜的17种(品种)蔬菜评价指标值
Table6.Evaluation index values of seventeen vegetables (varieties) planted after spring wheat in Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area
| 蔬菜种(品种) Vegetable species (variety) | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | C9 | C10 | C11 | C12 |
| 辣椒(娇龙7号) Pepper (Jiaolong 7) | 100a | 11.1c | 158.2C | 110.7C | 33.2b | 9.7A | 1.4b | 42.8a | 14.1b | 100.6b | 11.8b | 9.2a |
| 辣椒(洋大帅) Pepper (Yangdashuai) | 100a | 10.8c | 153.6C | 107.6C | 32.3b | 8.7AB | 1.4b | 40.0a | 15.7b | 121.0a | 13.5b | 9.4a |
| 黄瓜(德尔) Cucumber (De'er) | 100a | 13.7c | 195.8BC | 137.1C | 41.1a | 1.1CD | 1.6b | 42.5a | 19.7a | 117.5a | 12.7b | 8.7a |
| 黄瓜(626) Cucumber (626) | 100a | 14.6bc | 208.4B | 145.9C | 43.8a | 2.7C | 1.5b | 41.5a | 17.1a | 125.3a | 11.9b | 8.5a |
| 西葫芦Squash | 100a | 15.1b | 161.7C | 113.2C | 34.0b | 5.1B | 1.3b | 46.9a | 16.7a | 116.3a | 12.8b | 9.2a |
| 西红柿(丰收128) Tomato (harvest 128) | 100a | 10.6c | 151.1C | 105.7C | 31.7b | 1.5C | 1.3b | 43.5a | 21.3a | 114.4ab | 13.7b | 8.4a |
| 西红柿(粉印3号) Tomato (Fenyin 3) | 100a | 11.8c | 168.4C | 117.9C | 35.4b | 4.4C | 1.5b | 46.7a | 15.1b | 121.3a | 14.2b | 9.0a |
| 西兰花 Broccoli | 100a | 9.9c | 148.9C | 425.4B | 22.3c | 8.0B | 1.6b | 12.2b | 14.7b | 117.8a | 15.2b | 8.6a |
| 娃娃菜 Baby cabbage | 80ab | 29.6ab | 355.2A | 1014.9A | 53.3a | 18.4A | 3.3a | 29.2a | 15.9ab | 123.0a | 16.1ab | 9.0a |
| 莲花菜(碧时绿) Cabbage (Bishilv) | 80b | 12.8c | 153.0C | 437.1B | 23.0c | 1.5C | 1.9ab | 15.4b | 15.1b | 125.0a | 21.1a | 8.8a |
| 芹菜Celery | 70b | 11.6c | 139.1C | 397.4C | 20.9c | 4.8B | 2.4a | 14.0b | 21.2a | 131.0a | 27.2a | 8.9a |
| 生菜Lettuce | 70b | 9.9c | 118.3C | 337.9C | 17.7c | 7.5B | 1.5b | 11.9b | 18.3a | 117.0b | 23.8a | 9.0a |
| 苦苣Endive | 60b | 18.7b | 224.4AB | 641.1B | 33.7b | 1.5C | 3.1a | 18.4ab | 16.7a | 127.0a | 26.1a | 8.5a |
| 苤蓝Kohlrabi | 70b | 18.6b | 186.3C | 372.7BC | 27.9c | 4.8 C | 1.2b | 15.3b | 15.6b | 126.0a | 19.5a | 9.1a |
| 胡萝卜Carrot | 80b | 12.8c | 102.2C | 204.5C | 15.3 c | 6.6 C | 1.3b | 16.8b | 25.4a | 119.0a | 20.7a | 8.6a |
| 满堂红Mantanghong | 80b | 45.5a | 364.3A | 728.6B | 54.6a | 6.4 C | 2.4a | 29.9a | 18.4a | 121.0a | 22.2a | 8.6a |
| 白萝卜Turnip | 80b | 48.7a | 389.2A | 778.5AB | 58.4a | 13.7A | 2.4a | 32.0a | 21.7a | 131.0a | 25.1a | 8.8a |
| C1: 热量(≥10 ℃积温)利用效率(%); C2: 水分产出率(%); C3: 氮肥产出率(%); C4: 磷肥产出率(%); C5: 产量(×103 kg·hm-2); C6: 净收益(×103￥·hm-2); C7: 产投比; C8: 实际产量占理论产量比值(%); C9: 有机质含量(g·kg-1); C10: 碱解氮含量(mg·kg-1); C11: 有效磷含量(mg·kg-1); C12: pH的倒数(为了与其他指标变化一致, 便于比较)。同列数据后不同小写和大写字母分别表示各蔬菜处理间差异达5%和1%水平。C1: utilization efficiency of accumulated temperature ≥10 ℃ (%); C2: water production efficiency (%); C3: nitrogen fertilizer production efficiency (%); C4: phosphate fertilizer production efficiency (%); C5: yield (×103 kg·hm-2); C6: net income (×103￥·hm-2); C7: ratio of output to input; C8: ratio of actual yield to theoretical yield (%); C9: organic matter content (g·kg-1); C10: alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen content (mg·kg-1); C11: available phosphorus content (mg·kg-1); C12: reciprocal of pH. Different lowercase and capital letters in the same column indicate significant differences at 5% and 1% levels among different vegetable treatments, respectively. | ||||||||||||
下载: 导出CSV表7宁夏引黄灌区麦后复种17种(品种)蔬菜各评价指标的标准化值
Table7.Standardized values of evaluation indexes of seventeen vegetables (varieties) planted after spring wheat in Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area
| 蔬菜种(品种) Vegetable species (cultivar) | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | C9 | C10 | C11 | C12 |
| 辣椒(娇龙7号) Pepper (Jiaolong 7) | 5.00 | 1.12 | 1.78 | 1.02 | 2.74 | 2.98 | 1.40 | 4.53 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.83 |
| 辣椒(洋大帅) Pepper (Yangdashuai) | 5.00 | 1.09 | 1.72 | 1.01 | 2.66 | 2.76 | 1.32 | 4.21 | 1.57 | 3.68 | 1.44 | 1.12 |
| 黄瓜(德尔) Cucumber (De'er) | 5.00 | 1.39 | 2.30 | 1.14 | 3.48 | 1.00 | 1.80 | 4.50 | 2.98 | 3.22 | 1.23 | 3.75 |
| 黄瓜(626) Cucumber (626) | 5.00 | 1.48 | 2.48 | 1.18 | 3.72 | 1.37 | 1.65 | 4.38 | 2.06 | 4.25 | 1.03 | 4.58 |
| 西葫芦Squash | 5.00 | 1.54 | 1.83 | 1.03 | 2.81 | 1.92 | 1.22 | 5.00 | 1.92 | 3.07 | 1.26 | 1.83 |
| 西红柿(丰收128) Tomato (harvest 128) | 5.00 | 1.07 | 1.68 | 1.00 | 2.61 | 1.09 | 1.25 | 4.61 | 3.55 | 2.82 | 1.49 | 5.00 |
| 西红柿(粉印3号) Tomato (Fenyin 3) | 5.00 | 1.19 | 1.92 | 1.05 | 2.94 | 1.77 | 1.54 | 4.98 | 1.35 | 3.72 | 1.62 | 2.57 |
| 西兰花Broccoli | 5.00 | 1.00 | 1.65 | 2.41 | 1.73 | 2.60 | 1.68 | 1.04 | 1.21 | 3.26 | 1.88 | 4.16 |
| 娃娃菜Baby cabbage | 3.00 | 3.03 | 4.53 | 5.00 | 4.61 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 2.97 | 1.64 | 3.95 | 2.12 | 2.57 |
| 莲花菜(碧时绿) Cabbage (Bishilv) | 3.00 | 1.29 | 1.71 | 2.46 | 1.79 | 1.10 | 2.29 | 1.39 | 1.35 | 4.21 | 3.42 | 3.35 |
| 芹菜Celery | 2.00 | 1.17 | 1.51 | 2.28 | 1.60 | 1.86 | 3.27 | 1.23 | 3.51 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 2.96 |
| 生菜Lettuce | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.22 | 2.02 | 1.31 | 2.48 | 1.53 | 1.00 | 2.49 | 3.16 | 4.12 | 2.57 |
| 苦苣Endive | 1.00 | 1.91 | 2.70 | 3.36 | 2.78 | 1.10 | 4.57 | 1.75 | 1.92 | 4.47 | 4.71 | 4.58 |
| 苤蓝Kohlrabi | 2.00 | 1.90 | 2.17 | 2.17 | 2.25 | 1.86 | 1.02 | 1.39 | 1.53 | 4.34 | 3.00 | 2.20 |
| 胡萝卜Carrot | 3.00 | 1.30 | 1.00 | 1.43 | 1.00 | 2.26 | 1.18 | 1.56 | 5.00 | 3.42 | 3.31 | 4.16 |
| 满堂红Mantanghong | 3.00 | 4.67 | 4.65 | 3.74 | 4.73 | 2.21 | 3.22 | 3.06 | 2.52 | 3.68 | 3.70 | 4.16 |
| 白萝卜Turnip | 3.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 3.96 | 5.00 | 3.91 | 3.30 | 3.29 | 3.69 | 5.00 | 4.45 | 3.35 |
| C1-C12含义见图 2。The meanings of C1-C12 are shown in the figure 2. | ||||||||||||
下载: 导出CSV表8宁夏引黄灌区麦后复种17种(品种)蔬菜各指标对综合效益的贡献值
Table8.Contribution value of each evaluation index to comprehensive benefite of seventeen vegetable (varieties) planted after spring wheat in Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area
| 蔬菜种(品种) Vegetable species (cultivar) | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | C9 | C10 | C11 | C12 |
| 辣椒(娇龙7号) Pepper (Jiaolong 7) | 0.35 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| 辣椒(洋大帅) Pepper (Yangdashuai) | 0.35 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 黄瓜(德尔) Cucumber (De'er) | 0.35 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.94 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
| 黄瓜(626) Cucumber (626) | 0.35 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 1.01 | 0.33 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| 西葫芦Squash | 0.35 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.76 | 0.46 | 0.19 | 0.30 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| 西红柿(丰收128) Tomato (harvest 128) | 0.35 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.70 | 0.26 | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| 西红柿(粉印3号) Tomato (Fenyin 3) | 0.35 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.79 | 0.42 | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| 西兰花Broccoli | 0.35 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.47 | 0.62 | 0.27 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| 娃娃菜Baby cabbage | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 1.24 | 1.20 | 0.80 | 0.18 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| 莲花菜(碧时绿) Cabbage (Bishilv) | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.48 | 0.26 | 0.37 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 芹菜Celery | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| 生菜Lettuce | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.35 | 0.60 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| 苦苣Endive | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.75 | 0.26 | 0.73 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| 苤蓝Kohlrabi | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.61 | 0.45 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| 胡萝卜Carrot | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.54 | 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.20 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| 满堂红Mantanghong | 0.21 | 0.33 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 1.28 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| 白萝卜Turnip | 0.21 | 0.35 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 1.35 | 0.94 | 0.53 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| C1-C12含义见图 2。The meanings of C1-C12 are shown in the figure 2. | ||||||||||||
下载: 导出CSV表9宁夏引黄灌区麦后复种的17种(品种)蔬菜的综合评价结果
Table9.Comprehensive estimative results of seventeen vegetable (varieties) planted after spring wheat in Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area
| 蔬菜种(品种) Vegetable species (cultivar) | 资源利用 Resource utilization | 经济效益 Economic benefit | 地力提升 Promotion soil fertility | 综合效益 Comprehensive benefit |
| 娃娃菜Baby cabbage | 0.61 | 2.18 | 0.15 | 2.94 |
| 白萝卜Turnip | 0.74 | 1.66 | 0.28 | 2.68 |
| 满堂红Mantanghong | 0.71 | 1.23 | 0.22 | 2.15 |
| 辣椒(娇龙7号) Pepper (Jiaolong 7) | 0.48 | 1.21 | 0.08 | 1.77 |
| 辣椒(洋大帅) Pepper (Yangdashuai) | 0.48 | 1.13 | 0.13 | 1.73 |
| 苦苣Endive | 0.32 | 1.10 | 0.21 | 1.64 |
| 芹菜Celery | 0.30 | 1.04 | 0.27 | 1.61 |
| 西葫芦Squash | 0.51 | 0.96 | 0.14 | 1.61 |
| 西兰花Broccoli | 0.50 | 0.95 | 0.14 | 1.60 |
| 西红柿(粉印3号) Tomato (Fenyin 3) | 0.49 | 0.97 | 0.13 | 1.60 |
| 黄瓜(626) Cucumber (626) | 0.53 | 0.85 | 0.18 | 1.56 |
| 黄瓜(德尔) Cucumber (De'er) | 0.52 | 0.80 | 0.20 | 1.52 |
| 胡萝卜Carrot | 0.35 | 0.82 | 0.31 | 1.48 |
| 西红柿(丰收128) Tomato (Fengshou 128) | 0.48 | 0.74 | 0.24 | 1.45 |
| 生菜Lettuce | 0.27 | 0.90 | 0.20 | 1.37 |
| 莲花菜(碧时绿) Cabbage (Bishilv) | 0.38 | 0.71 | 0.16 | 1.26 |
| 苤蓝Kohlrabi | 0.36 | 0.69 | 0.16 | 1.21 |
下载: 导出CSV参考文献
| [1] | 刘巽浩, 陈阜, 吴尧. 多熟种植——中国农业的中流砥柱[J]. 作物杂志, 2015, (6): 1-9 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWZZ201506003.htm LIU X H, CHEN F, WU Y. Multiple cropping: The principal part of China's agriculture[J]. Crops, 2015, (6): 1-9 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWZZ201506003.htm |
| [2] | 梁玉刚, 周晶, 杨琴, 等. 中国南方多熟种植的发展现状、功能及前景分析[J]. 作物研究, 2016, 30(5): 572-578 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWYJ201605023.htm LIANG Y G, ZHOU J, YANG Q, et al. Development status, function and prospect analysis of the multiple cropping in southern China[J]. Crop Research, 2016, 30(5): 572-578 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWYJ201605023.htm |
| [3] | 赵胜. 气候变化背景下中国耕地现实熟制与潜在熟制差异的时空格局研究[D]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2018 ZHAO S. Temporal and spatial patterns of differences between the actual and potential multiple cropping of cultivated land in China under the background of climate change[D]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University, 2018 |
| [4] | 赵锦, 杨晓光, 刘志娟, 等. 全球气候变暖对中国种植制度可能影响Ⅱ. 南方地区气候要素变化特征及对种植制度界限可能影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(9): 1860-1867 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.09.012 ZHAO J, YANG X G, LIU Z J, et al. The possible effect of global climate changes on cropping systems boundary in China Ⅱ. The characteristics of climatic variables and the possible effect on northern limits of cropping systems in South China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(9): 1860-1867 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.09.012 |
| [5] | 金姝兰, 徐彩球, 潘华华. 我国粮食主产区耕地复种指数变化特征与潜力分析[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2011, 39(4): 201-204 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GATE201104064.htm JIN S L, XU C Q, PAN H H. Change characteristics and potential analysis for multiple cropping index of cropland in major grain producing areas in China[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 39(4): 201-204 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GATE201104064.htm |
| [6] | 赵永敢, 李玉义, 逄焕成, 等. 西南地区耕地复种指数变化特征和发展潜力分析[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2010, 31(1): 100-104 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NXDH201001029.htm ZHAO Y G, LI Y Y, PANG H C, et al. Characteristics and developmental potentials on multiple cropping index of arableland in southwestern China[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2010, 31(1): 100-104 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NXDH201001029.htm |
| [7] | 柴强, 高育峰, 黄高宝. 绿洲灌区多熟种植现状潜力与开发对策——以张掖市甘州区为例[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2005, 40(6): 832-836 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GSND200506025.htm CHAI Q, GAO Y F, HUANG G B. Current status potency and development countermeasure of multiple cropping in the oasis irrigation area[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2005, 40(6): 832-836 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GSND200506025.htm |
| [8] | 祖世亨, 曲成军, 高英姿, 等. 黑龙江省冬小麦气候区划研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2001, 9(4): 85-87 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTN200104032.htm ZU S H, QU C J, GAO Y Z, et al. Division of winter wheat planting area based on climate in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Chinese Journal Eco-Agriculture, 2001, 9(4): 85-87 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTN200104032.htm |
| [9] | REYENGA P J, HOWDEN S M, MEINKE H, et al. Global change impacts on wheat production along an environmental gradient in South Australia[J]. Environment International, 2001, 27(2/3): 195-200 |
| [10] | THOMAS A. Agricultural irrigation demand under present and future climate scenarios in China[J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2008, 60(3/4): 306-326 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818107000501 |
| [11] | ZHANG X Y, MA X. Misplaced optimism in agricultural land usage driven by newly available climate resources: A case study of estimated and realized cropping intensity in northern and northeastern China[J]. Climate Risk Management, 2019, 25: 100194 |
| [12] | YAN H M, LIU F, NIU Z E, et al. Changes of multiple cropping in Huang-Huai-Hai agricultural region, China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018, 28(11): 1685-1699 doi: 10.1007/s11442-018-1537-2 |
| [13] | 蒋敏, 李秀彬, 辛良杰, 等. 南方水稻复种指数变化对国家粮食产能的影响及其政策启示[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 32-43 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLXB201901004.htm JIANG M, LI X B, XIN L J, et al. The impact of paddy rice multiple cropping index changes in southern China on national grain production capacity and its policy implications[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(1): 32-43 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLXB201901004.htm |
| [14] | 黄国勤, 孙丹平. 中国多熟种植的发展现状与研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(3): 35-43 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNTB201703007.htm HUANG G Q, SUN D P. Development situation and research progress of multiple cropping in China[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(3): 35-43 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNTB201703007.htm |
| [15] | WILLEY R W. Intercropping-its importance and research needs. Part I. Competition and yield advantages[J]. Field Crops Abstract, 1979, 32(1): 1-10 http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10024068486/ |
| [16] | LI L, SUN J H, ZHANG F S, et al. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: I. Yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients[J]. Field Crops Research, 2001, 71(2): 123-137 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429001001563 |
| [17] | 刘广才, 杨祁峰, 李隆, 等. 小麦/玉米间作优势及地上部与地下部因素的相对贡献[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(2): 477-484 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWSB200802028.htm LIU G C, YANG Q F, LI L, et al. Intercropping advantage and contribution of above- and below-ground interactions in wheat-maize intercropping[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008, 32(2): 477-484 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWSB200802028.htm |
| [18] | 周宝元, 葛均筑, 侯海鹏, 等. 黄淮海平原南部不同种植体系周年气候资源分配与利用特征研究[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 937-949 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBZW202006013.htm ZHOU B Y, GE J Z, HOU H P, et al. Characteristics of annual climate resource distribution and utilization for different cropping systems in the South of Yellow-Huaihe-Haihe Rivers Plain[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(6): 937-949 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBZW202006013.htm |
| [19] | 伍思平, 眭锋, 肖小军, 等. 南方双季稻区不同复种方式对稻田综合温室效应的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2020, 34(2): 376-382 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNXB202002018.htm WU S P, SUI F, XIAO X J, et al. Effects of different multiple cropping pattern on the global warming potential in southern double cropping rice fields[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 34(2): 376-382 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNXB202002018.htm |
| [20] | 刘云龙, 张久东, 张卫建. 河西灌区小麦复种绿肥对小麦产量及土壤物理结构的影响[C]//中国作物学会. 2019年中国作物学会学术年会论文摘要集. 杭州: 中国作物学会, 2019: 1 LIU Y L, ZHANG J D, ZHANG W J. Effects of multiple cropping green manure on wheat yield and soil physical structure in Hexi Irrigation area[C]//Chinese Crop Association. Abstracts of Papers of the Annual Conference of Chinese Crop Association in 2019. Hangzhou: Chinese Crop Association, 2019: 1 |
| [21] | 李泽坤, 田德龙, 徐冰, 等. 不同灌溉水量下春小麦复种西兰花产量及水分利用效率研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2020, (3): 25-28 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNSD202003005.htm LI Z K, TIAN D L, XU B, et al. Research on the yield and water use efficiency of spring wheat replanted broccoli under different irrigation water volumes[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2020, (3): 25-28 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNSD202003005.htm |
| [22] | 张明. 春小麦高效复种模式及配套技术[J]. 现代农业, 2018, (6): 52-53 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDNY201806039.htm ZHANG M. High-efficiency multiple cropping pattern and matching technology of spring wheat[J]. Modern Agriculture, 2018, (6): 52-53 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDNY201806039.htm |
| [23] | 朱志明, 杨晓婉, 杜海东, 等. 宁夏引黄灌区种植制度的演变与发展[J]. 农业科学研究, 2019, 40(2): 39-45 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LXLX201902008.htm ZHU Z M, YANG X W, DU H D, et al. Evolution and development of tillage system in Ningxia Irrigation Area of Yellow River Diversion[J]. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 40(2): 39-45 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LXLX201902008.htm |
| [24] | 周立萍, 吴宏亮, 康建宏. 宁夏引黄灌区不同种植模式的经济效益分析[J]. 南方农业, 2019, 13(17): 99-101 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFNY201917054.htm ZHOU L P, WU H L, KANG J H. Economic benefit analysis of different planting patterns in Ningxia Irrigation District of diverting the Yellow River[J]. South China Agriculture, 2019, 13(17): 99-101 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFNY201917054.htm |
| [25] | 范玲, 何文寿, 贾彪. 宁夏引黄灌区麦后复种饲料油菜生长发育规律及其主要性状分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(7): 1355-1359 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNYX201807005.htm FAN L, HE W S, JIA B. Growth and Development rule and analysis of main characters of Brassica napus L. after spring wheat harvesting in irrigated area of Ningxia[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 31(7): 1355-1359 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNYX201807005.htm |
| [26] | 韦春雨, 贾彪, 何文寿. 氮磷配施对麦后复种饲料油菜农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2018, 57(20): 40-43 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBNY201820011.htm WEI C Y, JIA B, HE W S. Effects of nitrogen phosphorus combined application on agronomic characters and yield of Brassica napus of multiple cropping after wheat[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 57(20): 40-43 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBNY201820011.htm |
| [27] | 王东兴. 春小麦复种油葵高产栽培技术[J]. 现代农业, 2018, (10): 45 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDNY201810034.htm WANG D X. High-yield cultivation techniques of multiple cropping oil sunflower with spring wheat[J]. Modern Agriculture, 2018, (10): 45 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDNY201810034.htm |
| [28] | 栗鑫鑫, 钱必长, 李金融, 等. 不同种植方式对麦油两熟制花生生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2018, 50(6): 90-95 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AGRI201806015.htm LI X X, QIAN B C, LI J R, et al. Effects of different planting methods on physiological characteristics and yield of peanut in wheat-peanut double cropping system[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 50(6): 90-95 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AGRI201806015.htm |
| [29] | 朱倩倩, 刘国宏, 许咏梅, 等. 水氮对新疆南部麦后复种饲料油菜产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(7): 1033-1041 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2019-0706&flag=1 ZHU Q Q, LIU G H, XU Y M, et al. Effect of water and nitrogen on the yield and quality of forage rape grown after wheat in South Xinjiang[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(7): 1033-1041 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2019-0706&flag=1 |
| [30] | 刘超, 廖允成. 宁夏引黄灌区春小麦复种模式效益对比试验研究[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2018, 59(4): 12-14 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NXNL201804004.htm LIU C, LIAO Y C. Economic benefit comparison of multiple cropping patterns of spring wheat in Yellow River Irrigation Area, Ningxia[J]. Ningxia Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology, 2018, 59(4): 12-14 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NXNL201804004.htm |
| [31] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 第3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000 BAO S D. Agrochemical Analysis of Soils[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2000 |
| [32] | 宁夏统计年鉴委员会. 宁夏回族自治区统计年鉴分享平台[ EB/OL]. www.yearbookchina.com Committee of Ningxia Staticitical Sharing Platform of Statistical Yearbook of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[EB/OL]. www.yearbookchina.com |
| [33] | 李军. 农作学[M]. 第2版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016: 68-71 LI J. Science of Farming System[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Science Press, 2016: 68-71 |
| [34] | 刘根红, 许强, 乔娜, 等. 宁夏自流灌区农作物氮磷低污染种植结构优化[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2016, 34(1): 140-146 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHDQ201601023.htm LIU G H, XU Q, QIAO N, et al. Cultivation structure optimization of crops with low nitrogen and phosphorus pollution in irrigated Yellow River Region of Ningxia[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2016, 34(1): 140-146 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHDQ201601023.htm |
| [35] | 王长松, 周海波, 叶川. 江西省红壤旱地多年轮种模式的综合效益评价[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019, (14): 163-167 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ANHE201914098.htm WANG C S, ZHOU H B, YE C. Comprehensive benefit evaluation of crop rotation patterns of red soil dry land in Jiangxi Province[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, (14): 163-167 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ANHE201914098.htm |
| [36] | 刘根红, 许强, 康建宏, 等. 基于低污染的宁夏引黄灌区13种种植模式氮磷平衡分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2012, 30(2): 1-7 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHDQ201202002.htm LIU G H, XU Q, KANG J H, et al. Analysis of equilibrium between nitrogen and phosphorus in thirteen planting patterns in the area irrigated with Yellow River water in Ningxia based on low pollution[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2012, 30(2): 1-7 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHDQ201202002.htm |
| [37] | 杨印生, 林伟. 不同玉米种植模式的环境影响评价研究——基于LCA[J]. 农机化研究, 2015, 37(12): 1-6 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJYJ201512002.htm YANG Y S, LIN W. Study on environmental impact evaluation of different corn planting patterns-based on LCA[J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2015, 37(12): 1-6 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJYJ201512002.htm |
