胡宛彬2,,
1.中国社会科学院大学 北京 102488
2.韩国庆北国立大学 大邱 41566
基金项目: 国家社会科学基金重点项目17AZD012
中国社会科学院创新工程A类项目NFSA1801
详细信息
作者简介:赵会杰, 研究方向为生态经济学。E-mail: zhj11216688@sina.com
通讯作者:胡宛彬, 研究方向为林业生态学。E-mail: 1028512241@qq.com
中图分类号:F326.3计量
文章访问数:227
HTML全文浏览量:12
PDF下载量:670
被引次数:0
出版历程
收稿日期:2020-11-10
录用日期:2021-01-08
刊出日期:2021-03-01
Impact of farmer perceptions on the willingness to participate in the utilization of agricultural waste resources under environmental regulations
ZHAO Huijie1,,HU Wanbin2,,
1. University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 102488, China
2. Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, South Korea
Funds: the National Social Science Foundation of China17AZD012
the Class A Project of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Innovation ProjectNFSA1801
More Information
Corresponding author:HU Wanbin, E-mail: 1028512241@qq.com
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要
摘要:为提高农户农业废弃物资源化利用意愿，改善农村生态环境，顺应农民对美好人居环境的期待，本文基于河南、山东、四川、黑龙江4省693个农户的调研数据，建立多元有序Logistics模型，研究农户农业废弃物资源化利用价值与技能感知、成本收益感知与市场回收条件感知对其参与意愿的影响，并引入环境规制政策作为调节变量，分析了环境规制政策对农户农业废弃物资源化利用感知-参与意愿关系的调节效应。结果表明：1）农户农业废弃物资源化利用技能感知、成本感知、与回收渠道间的距离感知、回收渠道稳定性感知，均显著地影响其参与意愿；其中，农户技能感知和回收渠道稳定性感知对其参与意愿具有显著的正向影响。2）引导型规制对农户农业废弃物资源化利用前景感知与技能感知-参与意愿关系存在显著的正向调节效应；约束型规制对农户农业废弃物回收利用重要性感知、回收渠道稳定性感知-参与意愿关系存在显著的正向调节效应；激励型规制对农户农业废弃物资源化利用前景感知与技能感知、收益感知、回收渠道稳定性感知-参与意愿关系存在显著的正向调节效应，对与回收渠道间的距离感知-参与意愿关系存在显著负向调节效应。建议加强技术培训、增设更多补贴款项、健全农业废弃物回收机制，提高农户参与意愿，充分发挥3种规制政策的互补作用，不断调整优化农业废弃物资源化利用政策，持续推进农业农村绿色发展。
关键词:农户感知/
环境规制/
农业废弃物/
资源化利用/
参与意愿
Abstract:To increase farmer willingness to participate in the utilization of agricultural waste resources, improve the rural ecological environment, and comply with farmer expectations of a better living environment, this study developed a multivariate ordered Logistic model based on survey data from 693 farmers in Henan, Shandong, Sichuan, and Heilongjiang provinces. The effects of farmers' value and skill perceptions, cost-benefit perception, and market recycling condition perception on participation willingness were investigated. The results show that: 1) The skill, cost, and distance perceptions of farmers, together with recycling channels and their recycling channel stability perception, have significant effects on their willingness to participate. Skill perception and recycling channel stability perception also have significant positive effects on participation willingness. 2) Environmental regulatory policies are the most important factors underlying farm household agricultural waste resource utilization behavior, and there are differences in the moderating effects of the relationship between farmers' perception and participation willingness. Guiding regulations have significant positive moderating effects on the relationships between farmers' prospects perception and their participation willingness and farmers' skills perception and participation willingness. Restrictive regulations have significant positive moderating effects on the relationships between farmers' perception of recycling importance and their participation willingness, and farmers' recycling channel stability perception and participation willingness. Incentive regulations have significant positive moderating effects on the relationships between farmers' prospects perception and their participation willingness, farmers' skills perception and participation willingness, farmer's income perception and participation willingness, and farmers' recycling channel stability perception and participation willingness. Environmental regulations based on incentives also have a significant negative moderating effect on the relationship between farmer's distance perception with recycling channels, and their participation willingness. Intensive technical training, more subsidies, and improved agricultural waste recycling mechanisms may increase farmer willingness to participate, while the continuous adjustment and optimization of agricultural waste resource utilization and regulatory policies will aid green development of agriculture and rural areas.
Key words:Farmers' perception/
Environmental regulations/
Agricultural wastes/
Resource utilization/
Participation willingness
HTML全文
图1环境规制下农户农业废弃物资源化利用感知-参与意愿关系理论模型
Figure1.Theoretical model of the relationship between farmers' perception of agricultural waste resource utilization and participation willingness under environmental regulations
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片表1农户参与农业废弃物资源化利用的核心变量含义、赋值说明及研究区均值
Table1.Core variables meaning, assignment description and mean of the study area of farmers' perception of agricultural waste resource utilization
| 变量 Variable | 含义及符号 Meaning and symbol | 赋值标准 Assignment standard | 均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation |
| 被解释变量 Explained variable | 参与意愿 Participation willingness | 非常不愿意=1;不愿意=2;一般=3;愿意=4;非常愿意=5 Veryunwilling=1;unwilling=2;general=3;willing=4;very willing=5 | 4.21 | 0.02 |
| 解释变量 Explaining variables | 利用前景感知(UPP) Prospect perception (UPP) | 非常不乐观=1;不乐观=2;一般=3;乐观=4;非常乐观=5 Verypessimistic=1;pessimistic=2;general=3;optimistic=4;very optimistic=5 | 3.52 | 0.03 |
| 重要性感知(RIC) Importance perception (RIC) | 非常不重要=1;不重要=2;一般=3;重要=4;非常重要=5 Veryunimportant=1;unimportant=2;general=3;important=4;very important=5 | 3.65 | 0.02 | |
| 技能感知(USP) Technology perception (USP) | 完全不具备=1;不具备=2;一般=3;具备=4;完全具备=5 Not mastered at all=1;not mastered=2;general=3;mastered=4;very mastered=5 | 3.95 | 0.03 | |
| 利用收益感知(UBP) Benefit perception (UBP) | 非常低=1;比较低=2;一般=3;比较高=4;非常高=5 Verylow=1; low=2;general=3;high=4;very high=5 | 3.34 | 0.02 | |
| 利用成本感知(UCP) Cost perception (UCP) | 非常低=1;比较低=2;一般=3;比较高=4;非常高=5 Verylow=1; low=2;general=3;high=4;very high=5 | 3.82 | 0.04 | |
| 回收渠道感知(RCP) Recycle channel perception (RCP) | 没有=0;有=1 No=0;yes=1 | 0.21 | 0.02 | |
| 与回收渠道间的距离感知(CDP) Perception of distance to recycle channel (CDP) | 非常近=1;较近=2;一般=3;较远=4;非常远=5 Veryclose=1; close=2;general=3;far=4;very far=5 | 4.03 | 0.01 | |
| 回收渠道稳定性感知(CSP) Perception of recycle channel stability (CSP) | 非常不稳定=1;不稳定=2;一般=3;稳定=4;非常稳定=5 Veryunstable=1;unstable=2;general=3;stable=4;very stable=5 | 2.85 | 0.01 | |
| 调节变量 Moderating variables | 引导型规制(A1), 指政府的宣传教育和利用技术指导和培训的影响 Guiding regulations (A1), including effects of government's publicity and education, guidance and training on skills | 影响非常小=1;影响较小=2;一般=3;影响较大=4;影响非常大=5 Verysmall influence=1;small influence=2;general=3;large influence=4;very large influence=5 | 3.72 | 0.02 |
| 约束型环规制(A2), 包括环保部门的监管力度、环境影响评价落实程度和焚烧秸秆或粪污排放实质受罚力度 Restrictive regulations (A2), including supervision level of environmental protection department, assessment level of environmental impact, and substantial penalties for incineration of straw or manure discharge | 非常不到位=1;不到位=2;一般=3;到位=4;非常到位=5 Verynot in place=1;not in place=2;generally=3;in place=4;very in place=5 | 3.88 | 0.01 | |
| 激励性规制(A3), 包括相关资金补贴获取难易度和设施获取难易度 Incentive regulations (A3), including easeness of obtaining relevant fund, and obtaining facilities | 非常不容易=1;不容易=2;一般=3;容易=4;非常容易=5 Verydifficult=1;not easy=2;general=3;easy=4;very easy=5 | 3.91 | 0.01 | |
| 引导型规制、约束型规制和激励型规制均是通过将所有测量项目值相加后进行算术平均后得出。Guided regulation, restrictive regulation and incentive regulation are all obtained by adding up all the measured item values and then performing arithmetic averaging. | ||||
下载: 导出CSV表2农户参与农业废弃物资源化利用控制变量的统计描述及研究区均值
Table2.Descriptive and average values of the study area of control variables of farmers' perception of agricultural waste resource utilization
| 控制变量 Control variable | 赋值标准 Assignment standard | 均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation |
| 性别Gender (Gen) | 男=0;女=1 Male=0;female=1 | 0.18 | 0.02 |
| 年龄Age (Age) | 51.20 | 0.43 | |
| 受教育程度 Education level (Edu) | 没上过学=1;小学=2;初中=3;高中或中专=4;大专及以上=5 Uneducated=1; primary school=2;junior high school=3;senior high school or technical secondary school=4;college or above=5 | 3.20 | 0.04 |
| 组织化程度 Organization degree (OD) | 受访农户是否加入合作社: 否=0, 是=1 Whether the interviewed farmer joins the cooperative: no=0, yes=1 | 0.35 | 0.02 |
| 农业生产收入占比 Agricultural income proportion (FIP) | ≤30%;31%~60%;≥61% | 2.06 | 0.03 |
| 相关培训 Related training (RT) | 受访者是否参加过相关培训: 否=0, 是=1 Whether the respondent has participated in relevant training: no=0, yes=1 | 0.67 | 0.02 |
| 河南省虚拟变量 Dummy variables 1(Hdv) | 农户所在省份为河南省=1;其他=0 Farmers from Henan Province=1;farmers from others provinces=0 | 0.32 | 0.02 |
| 山东省虚拟变量 Dummy variables 2(Sdv) | 农户所在省份为山东省=1;其他=0 Farmers from Shandong Province=1;farmers from others provinces=0 | 0.20 | 0.02 |
| 黑龙江省虚拟变量 Dummy variables 3(HLdv) | 农户所在省份为黑龙江省=1;其他=0 Farmers from Heilongjiang Province=1;farmers from others provinces=0 | 0.17 | 0.01 |
下载: 导出CSV表3样本农户基本统计特征描述
Table3.Descriptive statistics of the characteristics of sampled farmers
| 类型 Type | 选项 Option | 样本量 Sample size | 比例 Rate (%) | 类型 Type | 选项 Option | 样本量 Sample size | 比例 Rate (%) | |
| 性别 Gender | 男Male | 571 | 82.4 | 加入合作社 Cooperative participation | 否No | 452 | 65.2 | |
| 女Female | 122 | 17.6 | 是Yes | 241 | 34.8 | |||
| 年龄 Age | ≤44 | 186 | 26.8 | 农业生产收入占比 Agricultural production income proportion | ≤30% | 202 | 29.1 | |
| 45~59 | 330 | 47.6 | 31%~60% | 255 | 36.8 | |||
| ≥60 | 177 | 25.6 | ≥61% | 236 | 34.1 | |||
| 受教育水平 Education level | 未上过学 Uneducated | 29 | 4.2 | 相关培训 Related training | 否No | 461 | 66.5 | |
| 是Yes | 232 | 333.5 | ||||||
| 小学Primary school | 125 | 18.0 | 省份Province | 河南Henan | 189 | 27.3 | ||
| 初中Junior high school | 349 | 50.4 | 山东Shandong | 165 | 23.8 | |||
| 高中或中专 Senior high school or technical secondary school | 139 | 20.0 | 四川Sichuan | 178 | 25.7 | |||
| 黑龙江Heilongjiang | 161 | 23.2 | ||||||
| 大专及以上College or above | 51 | 7.4 |
下载: 导出CSV表4农户农业废弃物资源化利用参与意愿的影响因素Logistics回归结果
Table4.Logistics regression results of factors affecting farmers' willingness to participate in the utilization of agricultural waste resources
| 变量 Variable | 回归(1) Regression (1) | 回归(2) Regression (2) | |||||
| 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 稳健标准误 Robust standard error | z值 z-value | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 稳健标准误 Robust standard error | z值 z-value | ||
| UPP | 0.058 | 0.112 | 0.520 | - | - | - | |
| RIC | 0.262 | 0.268 | 0.980 | - | - | - | |
| USP | 0.269** | 0.123 | 2.190 | 0.305*** | 0.119 | 2.570 | |
| UBP | 0.137 | 0.178 | 0.770 | - | - | - | |
| UCP | -0.074** | 0.101 | -0.730 | -0.081** | 0.089 | -0.805 | |
| RCP | 0.247 | 0.237 | 1.040 | - | - | - | |
| CDP | -1.088*** | 0.367 | -2.960 | -1.164*** | 0.367 | -3.170 | |
| CSP | 2.824*** | 0.467 | 6.050 | 3.076*** | 0.430 | 7.160 | |
| Gen | 0.050 | 0.234 | 0.210 | - | - | - | |
| Age | 0.015 | 0.009 | 1.540 | - | - | - | |
| Edu | 0.057 | 0.089 | 0.630 | - | - | - | |
| OD | 0.493** | 0.199 | 2.480 | 0.510*** | 0.196 | 2.610 | |
| FIP | 0.368*** | 0.124 | 2.960 | 0.356*** | 0.122 | 2.910 | |
| RT | -0.059 | 0.194 | -0.310 | - | - | - | |
| Hdv | -1.176*** | 0.276 | -4.260 | -1.190*** | 0.248 | -4.800 | |
| Sdv | -0.995*** | 0.297 | -3.350 | -1.077*** | 0.289 | -3.730 | |
| HLdv | 0.834*** | 0.293 | 2.850 | 0.863*** | 0.271 | 3.180 | |
| Pseudo R2 | 0.19 | 0.18 | |||||
| LR值LR-value | 184.01 | 177.38 | |||||
| P | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||||
| 各变量的意义见表 1和表 2。***、**和*分别表示在P < 1%、P < 5%和P < 10%水平显著。The descriptions of variables are shown in the table 1 and 2. ***, ** and * indicate that the estimated results are significant at the statistical levels of P < 1%, P < 5% and P < 10%, respectively. | |||||||
下载: 导出CSV表5环境规制对农户农业废弃物资源化利用感知-参与意愿关系的调节效应
Table5.Moderating effect of environmental regulations on farmers' perception-participation willingness of agricultural waste resource utilization
| 变量 Variable | 引导型规制Guiding regulation | 约束型规制Restrictive regulation | 激励型规制Incentive regulation | ||||||||||||||
| 低于均值组 Group below the mean | 高于均值组 Group above the mean | 低于均值组 Group below the mean | 高于均值组 Group above the mean | 低于均值组 Group below the mean | 高于均值组 Group above the mean | ||||||||||||
| 系数 Coefficient | 稳健标 准误 Robust standard error | 系数 Coefficient | 稳健标 准误 Robust standard error | 系数 Coefficient | 稳健标 准误 Robust standard error | 系数 Coefficient | 稳健标 准误 Robust standard error | 系数 Coefficient | 稳健标 准误 Robust standard error | 系数 Coefficient | 稳健标 准误 Robust standard error | ||||||
| UPP | -0.190 | 0.174 | 0.274* | 0.157 | 0.499 | 0.230 | -0.058 | 0.141 | 0.154 | 0.277 | 0.161** | 0.130 | |||||
| RIC | 0.759 | 0.426 | -0.235 | 0.359 | 1.310 | 0.622 | 1.313* | 0.312 | 1.349 | 0.864 | -0.113 | 0.290 | |||||
| USP | 0.675 | 0.211 | 0.738*** | 0.160 | 0.509 | 0.241 | 0.201 | 0.156 | 0.037 | 0.297 | 0.313** | 0.143 | |||||
| UBP | 0.302 | 0.304 | -0.053 | 0.230 | 0.015 | 0.337 | 0.044 | 0.219 | 0.803 | 0.571 | 0.836* | 0.191 | |||||
| UCP | -0.099 | 0.156 | -0.098 | 0.143 | 0.138 | 0.192 | -0.165 | 0.127 | 0.453 | 0.291 | -0.133 | 0.115 | |||||
| RCP | 0.097 | 0.380 | 0.361 | 0.311 | 0.251 | 0.438 | 0.328 | 0.301 | 0.720 | 0.688 | 0.196 | 0.266 | |||||
| CDP | -1.335 | 0.489 | -0.674 | 0.575 | -1.202 | 0.637 | -0.818 | 0.471 | -1.966 | 0.817 | -0.642* | 0.413 | |||||
| CSP | 2.861 | 0.652 | 1.753 | 0.806 | 2.096** | 0.707 | 1.940*** | 0.989 | 2.402 | 1.169 | 3.182*** | 1.059 | |||||
| Gen | -0.171 | 0.350 | 0.417 | 0.353 | -0.966* | 0.582 | 0.299 | 0.264 | -0.548 | 0.589 | 0.258 | 0.258 | |||||
| Age | 0.030 | 0.015 | 0.001 | 0.013 | 0.033* | 0.018 | 0.012 | 0.012 | -0.008 | 0.023 | 0.022** | 0.011 | |||||
| Edu | 0.213 | 0.144 | -0.065 | 0.119 | 0.239 | 0.204 | 0.018 | 0.109 | 0.024 | 0.221 | 0.085 | 0.103 | |||||
| OD | 0.533 | 0.325 | 0.414 | 0.265 | -0.013 | 0.372 | 0.666*** | 0.249 | 1.105** | 0.549 | 1.531** | 0.226 | |||||
| FIP | 0.361* | 0.188 | 0.408** | 0.175 | 0.408* | 0.231 | 0.431** | 0.156 | -0.384 | 0.356 | 0.496*** | 0.141 | |||||
| RT | -0.420 | 0.316 | 0.123 | 0.261 | 0.560 | 0.408 | -0.140 | 0.239 | 0.258 | 0.538 | -0.020 | 0.217 | |||||
| Hdv | -0.979** | 0.434 | -1.251*** | 0.374 | -0.690 | 0.558 | -1.624*** | 0.383 | -0.708 | 0.693 | -1.308*** | 0.323 | |||||
| Sdv | -0.412 | 0.453 | -1.576*** | 0.438 | 0.348 | 0.670 | -1.346*** | 0.385 | -1.604* | 0.867 | -1.006*** | 0.332 | |||||
| HLdv | 1.837*** | 0.526 | 0.317 | 0.385 | 1.049* | 0.626 | 0.908*** | 0.352 | 1.310 | 0.843 | 0.865*** | 0.328 | |||||
| 样本量 Sample size | 319 | 374 | 167 | 526 | 105 | 588 | |||||||||||
| Pseudo R2 | 0.290 | 0.127 | 0.277 | 0.183 | 0.359 | 0.178 | |||||||||||
| LR统计量 LR-value | 137.87 | 60.65 | 91.58 | 109.02 | 80.15 | 121.48 | |||||||||||
| P | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||||||||||
| 各变量的意义见表 1和表 2。***、**和*分别表示在P < 1%、P < 5%和P < 10%水平显著。The descriptions of variables are shown in the table 1 and 2. ***, ** and * indicate that the estimated results are significant at the statistical levels of P < 1%, P < 5% and P < 10%, respectively. | |||||||||||||||||
下载: 导出CSV参考文献
| [1] | 金书秦, 沈贵银, 魏珣, 等. 论农业面源污染的产生和应对[J]. 农业经济问题, 2013, 34(11): 97-102 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJWT201311015.htm JIN S Q, SHEN G Y, WEI X, et al. On the production and countermeasures of agricultural non-point source pollution[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2013, 34(11): 97-102 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJWT201311015.htm |
| [2] | ISODA N, RODRIGUES R, SILVA A, et al. Optimization of preparation conditions of activated carbon from agriculture waste utilizing factorial design[J]. Powder Technology, 2014, 256: 175-181 doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.02.029 |
| [3] | 农业部, 国家发展改革委, 财政部, 等. 关于推进农业废弃物资源化利用试点的方案[EB/OL]. (2017-11-25)[2020- 12-14]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/nybgb/2016/dishiqi/201711/t20171125_5919551.htm Ministry of Agriculture of the People' Republic of China, National Development and Reformation Commission, Ministry of Finance of the People' Republic of China, et al. Plan on promoting the pilot program of agricultural waste resource utilization[EB/OL]. (2017-11-25)[2020-12-14]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/nybgb/2016/dishiqi/201711/t20171125_5919551.htm |
| [4] | HAMELIN L, BORZECKA M, KOZAK M, et al. A spatial approach to bioeconomy: Quantifying the residual biomass potential in the EU-27[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 100: 127-142 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.017 |
| [5] | 耿维, 胡林, 崔建宇, 等. 中国区域畜禽粪便能源潜力及总量控制研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(1): 171-179+295 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYGU201301025.htm GENG W, HU L, CUI J Y, et al. Biogas energy potential for livestock manure and gross control of animal feeding in region level of China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(1): 171-179+295 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYGU201301025.htm |
| [6] | 张崇尚, 刘乐, 陆岐楠, 等. 中国秸秆能源化利用潜力与秸秆能源企业区域布局研究[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(3): 473-481 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZY201703009.htm ZHANG C S, LIU L, LU Q N, et al. Potential and regional distribution for the energy utilization of crop residues in China[J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(3): 473-481 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZY201703009.htm |
| [7] | 韦佳培, 刘源源. 我国资源性农业废弃物价值的时空分异[J]. 求索, 2014, (6): 65-70 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QSZZ201406012.htm WEI J P, LIU Y Y. The temporal and spatial differentiation of the value of resource agricultural wastes in China[J]. Seeker, 2014, (6): 65-70 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QSZZ201406012.htm |
| [8] | MENG L Y, XIE L, RIYA S, et al. Impact of turning waste on performance and energy balance in thermophilic solid-state anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste[J]. Waste Management, 2019, 87: 183-191 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.012 |
| [9] | TSAPEKOS P, ALVARADO-MORALES M, KOUGIAS P G, et al. Enhancing anaerobic digestion of agricultural residues by microaerobic conditions[J]. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s13399-019-00430-4 |
| [10] | SIGURNJAK I, BRIENZA C, SNAUWAERT E, et al. Production and performance of bio-based mineral fertilizers from agricultural waste using ammonia (stripping-) scrubbing technology[J]. Waste Management, 2019, 89: 265-274 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.043 |
| [11] | NISA K, SIRINGO-RINGO L, ZAITUN, et al. The utilization of agricultural waste biochar and straw compost fertilizer on paddy plant growth[C]//IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1st South Aceh International Conference on Engineering and Technology (SAICOET) 8-9 December 2018. Indonesia: IOP Publishing, 2019, 506(1): 012061 |
| [12] | HUANG L, SUN N, BAN L T, et al. Ability of different edible fungi to degrade crop straw[J]. AMB Express, 2019, 9(1): 4 doi: 10.1186/s13568-018-0731-z |
| [13] | 文春波, 钱发军, 刘鹏. 农业秸秆资源化利用现状与评价[J]. 生态经济, 2018, 34(2): 147-150+157 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STJJ201802028.htm WEN C B, QIAN F J, LIU P. Situation and evaluation of agricultural straw resource utilization[J]. Ecological Economy, 2018, 34(2): 147-150+157 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STJJ201802028.htm |
| [14] | VEERAVALLI S S, SHANMUGAM S R, RAY S, et al. Biohydrogen production from renewable resources[M]//HOSSEION M. Advanced Bioprocessing for Alternative Fuels, Biobased Chemicals, and Bioproducts. USK: Woodhead Publishing, 2019: 289-312 |
| [15] | QI G X, XIONG L, LI H L, et al. Hydrotropic pretreatment on wheat straw for efficient biobutanol production[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2019, 122: 76-83 doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.01.039 |
| [16] | 孙智君. 基于农业废弃物资源化利用的农业循环经济发展模式探讨[J]. 生态经济(学术版), 2008, (1): 197-199+207 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STJX200801051.htm SUN Z J. A study on the model of agricultural circular economic development based on comprehensive utilization of agricultural wastes[J]. Ecological Economy (Academic Edition), 2008, (1): 197-199+207 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STJX200801051.htm |
| [17] | 陶思源. 基于农业循环经济视角下的农业废弃物资源化利用[J]. 农业经济, 2013, (4): 22-23 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6139.2013.04.008 TAO S Y. Resource utilization of agricultural waste based on the perspective of agricultural circular economy[J]. Agricultural Economy, 2013, (4): 22-23 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6139.2013.04.008 |
| [18] | 吕忠梅. 美丽乡村建设视域下的环境法思考[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 33(2): 1-9 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZND201402001.htm LV Z M. Meditation of environmental law from the perspective of the construction of beautiful villages[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 33(2): 1-9 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZND201402001.htm |
| [19] | 李冉, 沈贵银, 金书秦. 畜禽养殖污染防治的环境政策工具选择及运用[J]. 农村经济, 2015, (6): 95-100 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NCJJ201506020.htm LI R, SHEN G Y, JIN S Q. Selection and application of environmental policy tools for pollution control of livestock and poultry breeding[J]. Rural Economy, 2015, (6): 95-100 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NCJJ201506020.htm |
| [20] | 王树义, 刘琳. 论我国农村环境保护之法治保障——以立法保护为重点[J]. 环境保护, 2015, 43(21): 43-47 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJBU201521012.htm WANG S Y, LIU L. Essay on law guarantee of China rural environmental protection: Focusing on the legislation protection[J]. Environmental Protection, 2015, 43(21): 43-47 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJBU201521012.htm |
| [21] | 魏佳容. 减量化与资源化: 农业废弃物法律调整路径研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, (1): 116-122 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZND201901014.htm WEI J R. Reduction and recycling: A study on the legal adjustment path of agricultural waste[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2019, (1): 116-122 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZND201901014.htm |
| [22] | 司瑞石, 陆迁, 张强强, 等. 病死畜禽废弃物资源化利用研究——基于中外立法脉络的视角[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(12): 2392-2400 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZY201812007.htm SI R S, LU Q, ZHANG Q Q, et al. Study on the recycling utilization of dead livestock and poultry wastes based on the context perspective of Chinese and foreign legislation[J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(12): 2392-2400 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZY201812007.htm |
| [23] | 覃诚, 毕于运, 高春雨, 等. 美国农业焚烧管理对中国秸秆禁烧管理的启示[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(12): 2382-2391 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZY201812006.htm QIN C, BI Y Y, GAO C Y, et al. Enlightenment of the U. S. agricultural burning management on straw burning management in China[J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(12): 2382-2391 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZY201812006.htm |
| [24] | 李鹏, 张俊飚, 颜廷武. 农业废弃物循环利用参与主体的合作博弈及协同创新绩效研究——基于DEA-HR模型的16省份农业废弃物基质化数据验证[J]. 管理世界, 2014, (1): 90-104 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLSJ201401011.htm LI P, ZHANG J B, YAN T W. Research on the cooperative game and collaborative innovation performance of the participants in agricultural waste recycling-Based on the DEA-HR model of 16 provinces agricultural waste matrix data verification[J]. Management World, 2014, (1): 90-104 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLSJ201401011.htm |
| [25] | 李昊, 李世平, 南灵. 农户农业环境保护为何高意愿低行为?——公平性感知视角新解[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, (2): 18-27 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZND201802004.htm LI H, LI S P, NAN L. Why farmers' higher willingness of agricultural environmental protection results in lower behavior?-new insights from fairness perception[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2018, (2): 18-27 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZND201802004.htm |
| [26] | 孔凡斌, 张维平, 潘丹. 农户畜禽养殖污染无害化处理意愿与行为一致性分析——以5省754户生猪养殖户为例[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2018, (4): 125-132 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2382.2018.04.016 KONG F B, ZHANG W P, PAN D. The consistency of farmer's willingness and behavior for harmless disposal of livestock pollution-a survey of 754 pig farmers in five provinces[J]. Modern Economic Research, 2018, (4): 125-132 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2382.2018.04.016 |
| [27] | 李傲群, 李学婷. 基于计划行为理论的农户农业废弃物循环利用意愿与行为研究——以农作物秸秆循环利用为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33(12): 33-40 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH201912006.htm LI A Q, LI X T. Study on farmer's willingness and behavior about agricultural waste recycling based on the theory of planned behavior[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2019, 33(12): 33-40 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH201912006.htm |
| [28] | 吴宏伟, 朱竹清, 刘咏梅. 秸秆焚烧的治理困境及其经济学分析[J]. 农村经济, 2014, (11): 111-115 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7103.2014.11.041 WU H W, ZHU Z Q, LIU Y M. The governance dilemma of straw burning and its economic analysis[J]. Rural Economy, 2014, (11): 111-115 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7103.2014.11.041 |
| [29] | 李乾, 王玉斌. 畜禽养殖废弃物资源化利用中政府行为选择——激励抑或惩罚[J]. 农村经济, 2018, (9): 55-61 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7103.2018.09.026 LI Q, WANG Y B. Government behavior choice in resource utilization of livestock and poultry breeding waste-Incentive or punishment[J]. Rural Economy, 2018, (9): 55-61 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7103.2018.09.026 |
| [30] | 王舒娟. 小麦秸秆还田的农户支付意愿分析——基于江苏省农户的调查数据[J]. 中国农村经济, 2014, (5): 74-85 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201405011.htm WANG S J. Analysis of farmers' willingness to pay for returning wheat straw to the field-Based on survey data of farmers in Jiangsu Province[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2014, (5): 74-85 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201405011.htm |
| [31] | 何可, 张俊飚. 基于农户WTA的农业废弃物资源化补偿标准研究——以湖北省为例[J]. 中国农村观察, 2013, (5): 46-54+96 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNCG201305006.htm HE K, ZHANG J B. Compensation Standard estimates of agricultural waste utilization based on farmer's willingness to accept: An example of Hubei Province[J]. China Rural Survey, 2013, (5): 46-54+96 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNCG201305006.htm |
| [32] | 何可, 张俊飚, 田云. 农业废弃物资源化生态补偿支付意愿的影响因素及其差异性分析——基于湖北省农户调查的实证研究[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(3): 627-637 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZY201303022.htm HE K, ZHANG J B, TIAN Y. Influencing factors and differences in farmer willingness to pay for ecological compensation of agricultural waste utilization: Based on rural areas of Hubei[J]. Resources Science, 2013, 35(3): 627-637 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZY201303022.htm |
| [33] | 颜廷武, 何可, 崔蜜蜜, 等. 农民对作物秸秆资源化利用的福利响应分析——以湖北省为例[J]. 农业技术经济, 2016, (4): 28-40 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJS201604003.htm YAN T W, HE K, CUI M M, et al. Analysis on the welfare response of farmers to the utilization of crop straw resources-A case of Hubei Province[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2016, (4): 28-40 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJS201604003.htm |
| [34] | 全世文, 刘媛媛. 农业废弃物资源化利用: 补偿方式会影响补偿标准吗?[J]. 中国农村经济, 2017, (4): 13-29 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201704002.htm QUAN S W, LIU Y Y. Does the compensation approach impact compensation criteria: Evidence from China's compensation policy on agricultural wastes recycling?[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2017, (4): 13-29 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201704002.htm |
| [35] | 王欢, 乔娟, 李秉龙. 养殖户参与标准化养殖场建设的意愿及其影响因素——基于四省(市)生猪养殖户的调查数据[J]. 中国农村观察, 2019, (4): 111-127 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNCG201904008.htm WANG H, QIAO J, LI B L. Farmers' willingness to participate in standardized farms construction and its determinants: An analysis based on survey data from pig breeders in four provinces[J]. China Rural Survey, 2019, (4): 111-127 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNCG201904008.htm |
| [36] | 李国志. 农户秸秆还田的受偿意愿及影响因素研究——基于黑龙江省806个农户调研数据[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(6): 31-36 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH201806005.htm LI G Z. Factors influencing on farmers' willingness to accept the straw-to-field: Cases in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2018, 32(6): 31-36 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH201806005.htm |
| [37] | 杨玉苹, 朱立志, 孙炜琳. 农户参与农业生态转型: 预期效益还是政策激励?[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(8): 140-147 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGRZ201908016.htm YANG Y P, ZHU L Z, SUN W L. Farmers' participation in agro-ecological transformation: Expected benefits or policy incentives?[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2019, 29(8): 140-147 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGRZ201908016.htm |
| [38] | 蒋琳莉, 张俊飚, 何可, 等. 农业生产性废弃物资源处理方式及其影响因素分析——来自湖北省的调查数据[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(9): 1925-1932 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZY201409019.htm JIANG L L, ZHANG J B, HE K, et al. Agricultural productive waste resource treatment and influencing factors in rural Hubei[J]. Resources Science, 2014, 36(9): 1925-1932 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZY201409019.htm |
| [39] | 丁焕峰, 孙小哲. 禁烧政策真的有效吗——基于农户与政府秸秆露天焚烧问题的演化博弈分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2017, (10): 79-92 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJS201710008.htm DING H F, SUN X Z. Is the ban on burning really effective?-Based on the evolutionary game analysis of the open burning of straw by farmers and the government[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical, 2017, (10): 79-92 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJS201710008.htm |
| [40] | 颜廷武, 张童朝, 何可, 等. 作物秸秆还田利用的农民决策行为研究——基于皖鲁等七省的调查[J]. 农业经济问题, 2017, 38(4): 39-48+110-111 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJWT201704005.htm YAN T W, ZHANG T C, HE K, et al. Study on farmers' decision behavior of crop straw recycling of returning to field: Based on farmers' survey of seven provinces[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2017, 38(4): 39-48+110-111 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJWT201704005.htm |
| [41] | 李鹏, 张俊飚, 丁玉梅, 等. 农业生产废弃物循环利用的产业联动绩效及影响因素的实证研究——以废弃物基质化产业为例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2012, (11): 69-77 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201211008.htm LI P, ZHANG J B, DING Y M, et al. An empirical study on the industrial linkage performance and influencing factors of waste recycling in agricultural production-Taking the waste matrix industry as an example[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2012, (11): 69-77 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201211008.htm |
| [42] | 吕杰, 王志刚, 郗凤明. 基于农户视角的秸秆处置行为实证分析——以辽宁省为例[J]. 农业技术经济, 2015, (4): 69-77 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJS201504009.htm LYU J, WANG Z G, XI F M. An empirical analysis of straw disposal behavior based on the perspective of farmers-Taking Liaoning Province as an example[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2015, (4): 69-77 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJS201504009.htm |
| [43] | 朱清海, 雷云. 社会资本对农户秸秆处置亲环境行为的影响研究——基于湖北省L县农户的调查数据[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(11): 15-21 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH201811003.htm ZHU Q H, LEI Y. Influence of social capital on the pro-environmental behavior of straw disposal by farmers in L county of Hubei Province[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2018, 32(11): 15-21 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH201811003.htm |
| [44] | 李祥妹, 刘淑怡, 刘亚洲. 农户棉花秸秆出售行为影响因素研究——以河北省邢台市威县为例[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, (6): 26-31+143 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZND201606004.htm LI X M, LIU S Y, LIU Y Z. An analysis on the influence factors of farmers' decision making in selling straw-A case study of Weixian, Xingtai City, Hebei Province[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2016, (6): 26-31+143 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZND201606004.htm |
| [45] | 赵俊伟, 陈永福, 尹昌斌. 生猪养殖粪污处理社会化服务的支付意愿与支付水平分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, (4): 90-97 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZND201904011.htm ZHAO J W, CHEN Y F, YIN C B. Analysis of willingness to pay and payment level of socialized services of manure treatment in pig breeding[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2019, (4): 90-97 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZND201904011.htm |
| [46] | 黄炜虹, 齐振宏, 邬兰娅, 等. 农户从事生态循环农业意愿与行为的决定: 市场收益还是政策激励?[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(8): 69-77 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGRZ201708009.htm HUANG W H, QI Z H, WU L Y, et al. Determinants of farmers' willingness and behavior to engage in ecological circular agriculture: Market returns or policy incentives?[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(8): 69-77 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGRZ201708009.htm |
| [47] | 黄炎忠, 罗小锋, 李容容, 等. 农户认知、外部环境与绿色农业生产意愿——基于湖北省632个农户调研数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(3): 680-687 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJLY201803024.htm HUANG Y Z, LUO X F, LI R R, et al. Farmer cognition, external environment and willingness of green agriculture production-Based on the survey data of 632 farmers in Hubei Province[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018, 27(3): 680-687 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJLY201803024.htm |
| [48] | 田波, 王雅鹏. 农户秸秆资源化利用意愿及其驱动因素研究——以武汉市与长沙市为例[J]. 农村经济, 2014, (9): 102-107 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NCJJ201409022.htm TIAN B, WANG Y P. Research on the willingness of farmers to use straw as a resource and its driving factors-Taking Wuhan and Changsha as examples[J]. Rural Economy, 2014, (9): 102-107 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NCJJ201409022.htm |
| [49] | 潘丹, 孔凡斌. 养殖户环境友好型畜禽粪便处理方式选择行为分析——以生猪养殖为例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2015, (9): 17-29 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201509004.htm PAN D, KONG F B. Analysis on the selection behavior of environmentally friendly livestock and poultry manure treatment methods of farmers-Taking pig breeding as an example[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2015, (9): 17-29 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201509004.htm |
| [50] | 班杜拉A. 思想和行动的社会基础: 社会认知论[M]. 林颖, 译. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2001 BANDURA A. Sociological Basis of Thought and Behavior: Social Cognitive Theory[M]. LIN Y, trans. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 2001 |
| [51] | 张郁, 江易华. 环境规制政策情境下环境风险感知对养猪户环境行为影响——基于湖北省280户规模养殖户的调查[J]. 农业技术经济, 2016, (11): 76-86 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJS201611008.htm ZHANG Y, JIANG Y H. The impact of environmental risk perception on the environmental behavior of pig farmers in the context of environmental regulatory policies-Based on a survey of 280 large-scale farmers in Hubei Province[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical, 2016, (11): 76-86 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJS201611008.htm |
| [52] | 贾秀飞, 叶鸿蔚. 秸秆焚烧污染治理的政策工具选择——基于公共政策学、经济学维度的分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(1): 36-41 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH201601007.htm JIA X F, YE H W. Selection of the policy tools for straw burning pollution control-According to the analysis of public policy, economics dimension[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016, 30(1): 36-41 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH201601007.htm |
| [53] | 于婷, 于法稳. 环境规制政策情境下畜禽养殖废弃物资源化利用认知对养殖户参与意愿的影响分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019, (8): 91-108 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201908006.htm YU T, YU F W. Analysis of the impact of the cognition of livestock and poultry breeding waste resources utilization on the willingness of farmers to participate in the context of environmental regulation policies[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019, (8): 91-108 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201908006.htm |
