删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

太行山区不同农业景观生境的蜘蛛群落结构特征及其影响因子

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

陈曦1,,
张旭珠1, 2,
金池1,
李安1,
高萌萌1,
卢彤1,
张晓华3,
李良涛1,,
1.河北工程大学园林与生态工程学院 邯郸 056038
2.中国农业大学资源与环境学院 北京 100193
3.河北武安青崖寨国家级自然保护区管理中心 武安 056300
基金项目: 农业部农业环境生物多样性及生态服务功能提升项目20110402
河北省科技计划项目6226309D-3
邯郸市科技技术研究与发展计划项目1727201065


详细信息
作者简介:陈曦, 主要从事农业景观生物多样性研究。E-mail:10276242@qq.com
通讯作者:李良涛, 主要从事景观生态规划与生物多样性研究。E-mail:liliangtao@hebeu.edu.cn
中图分类号:Q14

计量

文章访问数:318
HTML全文浏览量:14
PDF下载量:183
被引次数:0
出版历程

收稿日期:2020-03-09
录用日期:2020-04-07
刊出日期:2020-10-01

Effects of agricultural landscape habitat types on spider community structure and the influencing factors in Taihang Mountain

CHEN Xi1,,
ZHANG Xuzhu1, 2,
JIN Chi1,
LI An1,
GAO Mengmeng1,
LU Tong1,
ZHANG Xiaohua3,
LI Liangtao1,,
1. College of Landscape and Ecological Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China
2. College of Resources and Environment, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
3. Management Center of Wu'an Qingyazhai National Nature Reserve in Hebei, Wu'an 056300, China
Funds: the Project of Improvement of Agro-Environmental Biodiversity and Ecological Service Function of Ministry of Agriculture20110402
the Science and Technology Planning Project of Hebei Province6226309D-3
Handan Science and Technology Research and Development Project1727201065




摘要
HTML全文
(5)(4)
参考文献(55)
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件(0)
访问统计

摘要
摘要:为探索太行山区农业景观中不同生境类型对蜘蛛多样性的影响,采用陷阱法对河北省武安市西部太行山区5种类型生境(核桃林、玉米地、苹果-芍药套作园、次生林、绿海花廊景观带)的地表蜘蛛多样性进行调查。通过分析5种类型生境中蜘蛛多样性分布及其与局部生境因子的相关关系,探讨半自然生境对蜘蛛的保护作用。结果表明:人为干扰会显著降低生境中蜘蛛丰富度和多度;增加植被群落结构的复杂程度会使生境中蜘蛛丰富度显著增加,而蜘蛛的多度显著降低;蜘蛛的多度随生境中枯落物厚度的增加而增加。其中核桃林的蜘蛛Shannon-Wiener多样性显著高于其他4种类型生境,核桃林、次生林和绿海花廊的蜘蛛丰富度显著高于苹果-芍药套作园和玉米地,苹果-芍药套作园和绿海花廊的蜘蛛多度显著高于其他3种生境。玉米地、苹果园-芍药套作和绿海花廊中蜘蛛的群落组成具有较高相似性,而核桃林与次生林中蜘蛛群落结构具有较高异质性。地表枯落物厚度是影响当地蜘蛛群落结构的最主要因素。研究区在农业景观与自然景观的过渡区种植核桃林、苹果-芍药套作园和绿海花廊间作板栗,对蜘蛛多样性的保护都有积极作用;不同的生境因子与不同蜘蛛群落的关系不同,如狼蛛偏向人为干扰较大的苹果-芍药套作园和绿海花廊景观带,所以生产管理时要结合特有的生境条件,对相应的蜘蛛进行合理的保护和高效的利用。研究结果对当地的农业景观生境管理和生物多样性保护具有指导意义。
关键词:半自然生境/
生物多样性保护/
蜘蛛/
生境因子/
群落结构
Abstract:Ground-dwelling spiders were collected using pitfall traps from five different habitats (walnut grove, maize field, apple-peony intercropping orchard, secondary forest, and flower belt) to explore the effects of various habitats on the distribution of spiders in the agricultural landscape of Taihang, Wu'an City mountain area. The distribution of spider diversity and their correlation with the local habitat factors were analyzed. The results showed that walnut grove conserved significantly higher Shannon-Wiener diversity of spiders than the other four habitats. The spider richness was significantly higher in walnut grove, secondary forest, and flower belt than in apple-peony intercropping orchard and maize field; although, apple-peony intercropping orchard and flower belt significantly conserved spider abundance more than the other three habitats. A decrease in spider abundance was due to the field disturbance; however, the spider richness increased with increasing of vegetation complexity, while there was a negative correlation between spider abundance and the vegetation structure complexity. Moreover, the abundance of spiders increased with an increase in the understory litters. Understory litter was the most important factor which determined the spider composition; spider assemblage composition was homogeneous in maize fields, apple-peony intercropping orchard, and flower belts, whereas they were heterogeneous in walnut groves and natural forests. The results of this study indicated that walnut groves, apple-peony intercropping orchard, and intercropping flower with chestnut in the transition zone between agricultural landscape and natural landscape could contribute to spider conservation. Factors of different habitats had different relationships with different spider communities; for example, the Lycosidae prefers the apple-peony intercropping orchard and the flower belt with significant human interference. Therefore, the production management should combine the unique habitat conditions to conduct reasonable protection and efficient utilization of the corresponding spiders. Our results provide guidance for the management and biodiversity conservation of agricultural habitat in the study area.
Key words:Semi-natural habitats/
Biodiversity protection/
Spider/
Habitat factors/
Community structure

HTML全文


图1研究区不同类型生境样点分布
Figure1.Map of sampling sites of different habits in the study region


下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片


图2蜘蛛取样点设计
Figure2.Sampling plots design for spider collecting


下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片


图3不同类型生境中蜘蛛群落的多样性指数
Ⅰ:核桃林; Ⅱ:玉米地; Ⅲ:苹果-芍药套作园; Ⅳ:次生林; Ⅴ:绿海花廊。不同小写字母表示不同生境间差异显著(P < 0.001)。
Figure3.Spider community diversity indexes in different habitats
Ⅰ: walnut grove; Ⅱ: maize field; Ⅲ: apple-peony intercropping orchard; Ⅳ: secondary forest; Ⅴ: flower belt. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among habitats (P < 0.001).


下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片


图4基于Chord指数的不同生境蜘蛛群落非度量多维度分析
◆:核桃林; ▬:玉米地; ■:苹果-芍药套作园; ●:次生林; ▲:绿海花廊。
Figure4.Non-linear multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS) based on Chord measure for spider communities in different habitats
◆: walnut grove; ▬: maize field; ■: apple-peony intercropping orchard; ●: secondary forest; ▲: flower belt.


下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片


图5蜘蛛群落组成与环境因子的RDA排序图
Figure5.RDA ordination plot of environmental factors and spider community composition


下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表1研究区不同生境植物群落基本情况
Table1.General information of vegetation of different habitats in the study areas
样地
Habitat
植物物种数
Plant richness
植物群落结构
Vegetation community structure
草本盖度
Herb coverage (%)
人为干扰
Human disturbance
枯落物厚度
Litter depth (cm)
核桃林?Walnut grove 21.25±1.71 乔+灌+草
Tree + shrub + herbaceous vegetation
31.25±6.29 无?No 4.05±0.66
玉米地?Maize field 14.50±1.73 玉米?Only maize 82.50±6.45 强?Badly 0.62±0.16
苹果-芍药套作园
Apple-peony intercropping orchard
17.75±1.71 灌+草
Shrub + herbaceous vegetation
39.00±1.15 较强?Medium 1.80±0.23
次生林?Secondary forest 40.25±7.63 乔+灌+草
Tree + shrub + herbaceous vegetation
40.25±13.04 无?No 5.97±0.92
绿海花廊?Flower belt 43.75±3.40 灌+草?Shrub + herbaceous vegetation 78.25±2.36 弱?Low 2.10±0.33


下载: 导出CSV
表2不同生境类型地表蜘蛛群落组成
Table2.Composition of spiders communities at different habitats

Family
种类
Species
个体数?Individuals number 总数
Total
漏斗蛛科?Agelenidae Sp.1迷宫漏斗蛛?Agelena labyrinthica (Clerck, 1757) 2 6 2 5 4 19
Sp.2刺瓣拟隙蛛?Pireneitega spinivulva (Simon, 1880) 14 3 16 39 2 74
红螯蛛科?Cheiracanthiidae Sp.3彭妮红螯蛛?Cheiracanthium pennyi O. P.-Cambridge, 1873 1 0 0 1 0 2
管巢蛛科?Clubionidae Sp.4羽斑管巢蛛?Clubiona jucunda (Karsch, 1879) 2 0 0 0 0 2
Sp.5伪蕾管巢蛛?Clubiona pseudogermanica Schenkel, 1936 5 0 0 0 10 15
栉足蛛科?Ctenidae Sp.6田野阿纳蛛?Anahita fauna Karsch, 1879 5 4 8 16 9 42
卷叶蛛科?Dictynidae Sp.7洞叶蛛属 Cicurina 0 0 0 0 1 1
平腹蛛科?Gnaphosidae Sp.8显眼枝疣蛛
Cladothela oculinotata (B?senberg & Strand, 1906)
0 0 0 3 0 3
Sp.9石掠蛛?Drassodes lapidosus (Walckenaer, 1802) 4 2 2 7 0 15
Sp.10锚近狂蛛?Drassyllus vinealis (Kulczyński, 1897) 7 12 46 39 17 121
Sp.11中华平腹蛛?Gnaphosa sinensis Simon, 1880 0 0 9 0 1 10
Sp.12齿单蛛?Haplodrassus dentatus Xu & Song, 1987 15 0 0 12 0 27
Sp.13华美小蚁蛛 Micaria dives (Lucas, 1846) 1 0 0 2 0 3
Sp.14亚洲狂蛛?Zelotes asiaticus (B?senberg & Strand, 1906) 20 0 1 29 0 50
平腹蛛科?Gnaphosidae Sp.15小狂蛛?Zelotes exiguus (Müller & Schenkel, 1895) 6 1 14 11 19 51
Sp.16武昌狂蛛 Zelotes wuchangensis Schenkel, 1963 20 0 5 1 24 50
皿蛛科?Linyphiidae Sp.17黑丘皿蛛?Agyneta nigra (Oi, 1960) 2 0 0 0 0 2
Sp.18细丘皿蛛?Agyneta subtilis (O. P.-Cambridge, 1863) 0 0 1 0 0 1
Sp.19双舟蛛属?Dicymbium 1 0 0 0 0 1
Sp.20黑微蛛?Erigone atra Blackwall, 1833 1 0 0 0 17 18
Sp.21塔克额角
Gnathonarium taczanowskii (O.P.-Cambridge, 1873)
0 0 4 0 26 30
Sp.22橙色疣舟?Nematogmus sanguinolentus (Walckenaer, 1841) 3 0 0 0 0 3
Sp.23阴沟瘤蛛?Ummeliata feminea (B?senberg & Strand, 1906) 13 0 1 0 36 50
Sp.24未知属?Unknown 0 0 0 1 0 1
狼蛛科?Lycosidae Sp.25白纹舞蛛?Alopecosa albostriata (Grube, 1861) 1 0 1 0 25 27
Sp.26利氏舞蛛?Alopecosa licenti (Schenkel, 1953) 1 1 0 4 0 6
Sp.27尘舞蛛?Alopecosa pulverulenta (Clerck, 1757) 1 0 0 124 0 125
Sp.28湄潭熊蛛?Arctosa meitanensis Yin et al., 1993 1 0 0 61 0 62
Sp.29唇形狼蛛?Lycosa labialis Mao & Song, 1985 47 9 11 6 0 73
Sp.30星豹蛛?Pardosa astrigera L. Koch, 1878 12 54 1 139 0 737 1 942
Sp.31赫氏豹蛛?Pardosa hedini Schenkel, 1936 2 2 7 3 26 40
Sp.32类小水狼蛛?Piratula piratoides (B?senberg & Strand, 1906) 0 0 1 0 0 1
Sp.33奇异獾蛛?Trochosa ruricola (De Geer, 1778) 4 0 1 1 7 13
米图蛛科?Miturgidae Sp.34琴形佐蛛?Zora lyriformis Song, Zhu & Gao, 1993 2 0 0 0 0 2
线蛛科?Nemesiidae Sp.35河北雷文蛛?Raveniola hebeinica Zhu, Zhang & Zhang, 1999 3 0 1 50 15 69
类球蛛科?Nesticidae Sp.36底栖小类球蛛?Nesticella mogera (Yaginuma, 1972) 1 1 0 0 0 2
拟壁钱科?Oecobiidae Sp.37北国壁钱?Uroctea lesserti Schenkel, 1936 0 1 1 0 0 2
猫蛛科?Oxyopidae Sp.38利氏猫蛛?Oxyopes licenti Schenkel, 1953 0 0 0 1 1 2
逍遥蛛科?Philodromidae Sp.39红棕逍遥蛛?Philodromus rufus Walckenaer, 1826 0 2 0 1 0 3
Sp.40小狼逍遥蛛?Thanatus miniaceus Simon, 1880 0 4 20 2 26 52
跳蛛科?Salticidae Sp.41丽亚蛛?Asianellus festivus (C. L. Koch, 1834) 7 2 0 18 0 27
Sp.42前斑蛛?Euophrys frontalis (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 1 1 3 0 5
Sp.43白斑猎蛛?Evarcha albaria (L. Koch, 1878) 5 0 7 4 0 16
Sp.44铜头摩挡蛛?Modunda aeneiceps Simon, 1901 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sp.45美丽蚁蛛?Myrmarachne formicaria (De Geer, 1778) 3 0 0 0 0 3
Sp.46王拟蝇虎?Plexippoides regius Wesolowska, 1981 1 0 0 1 0 2
Sp.47波氏西菱头蛛Sibianor proszynski (Zhu & Song, 2001) 0 3 0 0 0 3
Sp.48笔状跃蛛?Sitticus penicillatus (Simon, 1875) 0 2 0 0 14 16
Sp.49中华跃蛛?Sitticus sinensis Schenkel, 1963 0 2 0 0 4 6
球蛛科?Theridiidae Sp.50齿螯蛛属?Enoplognatha 2 1 0 0 0 3
Sp.51近亲丘腹蛛?Episinus affinis B?senberg & Strand, 1906 0 0 0 1 0 1
Sp.52中华藻蛛?Phycosoma sinica (Zhu, 1992) 0 0 1 12 0 13
Sp.53日斯坦蛛?Stemmops nipponicus Yaginuma, 1969 2 0 0 47 2 51
蟹蛛科?Thomisidae Sp.54三突伊氏蛛?Ebrechtella tricuspidata (Fabricius, 1775) 0 1 0 0 0 1
Sp.55膨花蟹蛛?Xysticus conflatus Song, Tang & Zhu, 1995 3 1 0 0 0 4
Sp.56鞍形花蟹蛛?Xysticus ephippiatus Simon, 1880 21 23 23 77 272 416
Sp.57伪丝花蟹蛛?Xysticus pseudobliteus (Simon, 1880) 0 0 0 0 12 12
隐石蛛科?Titanoecidae Sp.58白斑隐蛛?Nurscia albofasciata (Strand, 1907) 3 0 2 0 10 15
管蛛科?Trachelidae Sp.59日本管蛛?Trachelas japonicus B?senberg & Strand, 1906 7 0 2 10 0 19
总数?Total 251 138 1 327 591 1 319 3 626
Ⅰ:核桃林; Ⅱ:玉米地; Ⅲ:苹果-芍药套作园; Ⅳ:次生林; Ⅴ:绿海花廊。Ⅰ: walnut grove; Ⅱ: maize field; Ⅲ: apple-peony intercropping orchard; Ⅳ: secondary forest; Ⅴ: flower belt.


下载: 导出CSV
表3各个生境因素与蜘蛛群落的丰富度和多度的相关性分析
Table3.Correlation of habitat factors with richness and abundance of spider community
因素
Factor
系数
Coefficient
标准化系数
Standardized coefficient
显著水平
Sig. (P)
回归方程
Regression model
丰富度
Richness
常数?Constant 12.500 0.001 y=12.500-1.750T+4.500S
人为干扰程度?Human disturbance (T) -1.750 -0.379 0.006
植物群落结构?Plant community structure (S) 4.500 0.626 0.000
多度
Abundance
常数?Constant 1.913 0.001 y=1.913-0.187T-0.852S+0.419D
人为干扰程度?Human disturbance (T) -0.187 -0.396 0.000
植物群落结构?Plant community structure (S) -0.852 -0.733 0.000
地表枯落物厚度?Litter depth (D) 0.419 0.607 0.000


下载: 导出CSV
表4基于RDA蒙卡洛检验的环境因子对蜘蛛群落组成的影响
Table4.Analysis of effects of environmental factors on spider community composition based on Monte Carlo significance test of the RDA models
环境因子
Environmental factor
解释率
Explanation rate (%)
F
F value
P
P value
地表枯落物厚度?Litter depth (D) 41.1 12.6 0.01
植物群落结构?Plant community structure (S) 15.9 6.3 0.01
人为干扰程度?Human disturbance (T) 6.9 3.1 0.03
植物丰富度?Plant richness (P) 10.3 6.0 0.01
草本盖度?Herb coverage (C) 4.0 2.5 0.02


下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(55)
[1]NORRIS K. Agriculture and biodiversity conservation:Opportunity knocks[J]. Conservation Letters, 2008, 1(1):2-11 doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00007.x
[2]贺达汉.农业景观与害虫种群控制[J].植物保护, 2009, 35(3):12-15 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zwbh200903003
HE D H. Landscape structure and control of insect pests in agroecosystems[J]. Plant Protection, 2009, 35(3):12-15 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zwbh200903003
[3]TILMAN D. Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion:The need for sustainable and efficient practices[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1999, 96(11):5995-6000 doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.5995
[4]FAHRIG L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity[J]. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2003, 34:487-515 doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419
[5]刘云慧, 李良涛, 宇振荣.农业生物多样性保护的景观规划途径[J].应用生态学报, 2008, 19(11):2538-2543 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yystxb200811035
LIU Y H, LI L T, YU Z R. Landscape planning approaches for biodiversity conservation in agriculture[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(11):2538-2543 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yystxb200811035
[6]段美春, 刘云慧, 张鑫, 等.以病虫害控制为中心的农业生态景观建设[J].中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(7):825-831 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2012703&flag=1
DUAN M C, LIU Y H, ZHANG X, et al. Agricultural disease and insect-pest control via agro-ecological landscape construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(7):825-831 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2012703&flag=1
[7]SUTTER L, ALBRECHT M, JEANNERET P. Landscape greening and local creation of wildflower strips and hedgerows promote multiple ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 55(2):612-620 doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12977
[8]BOLLER JR P F. Presidential Campaigns From George Washington To George W. Bush[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2004
[9]ZHAO Z H, REDDY G V P, HUI C, et al. Approaches and mechanisms for ecologically based pest management across multiple scales[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2016, 230:199-209 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=7e59ae7c981f0cb0816681c1f0f1aaeb
[10]赵紫华.从害虫"综合治理"到"生态调控"[J].科学通报, 2016, 61(18):2027-2034 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=kxtb201618007
ZHAO Z H. From "Integrated pest management" to "Ecologically based pest management"[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2016, 61(18):2027-2034 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=kxtb201618007
[11]李良涛, 刘文平, 肖禾, 等.农业景观中植物篱的建设与管理[J].中国水土保持, 2012, (6):26-29 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgstbc201206012
LI L T, LIU W P, XIAO H, et al. Construction and management of hedgerows in agricultural landscape[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2012, (6):26-29 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgstbc201206012
[12]WOLF S, ROMEIS J, COLLATZ J. Utilization of plant-derived food sources from annual flower strips by the invasive harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis[J]. Biological Control, 2018, 122:118-126 doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.04.008
[13]HATT S, MOUCHON P, LOPES T, et al. Effects of wildflower strips and an adjacent forest on aphids and their natural enemies in a pea field[J]. Insects, 2017, 8(3):99 doi: 10.3390/insects8030099
[14]KLEIN A M, VAISSIERE B E, CANE J H, et al. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences, 2006, 274(1608):303-313 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721
[15]CLOUGH Y, KRUESS A, KLEIJN D, et al. Spider diversity in cereal fields:Comparing factors at local, landscape and regional scales[J]. Journal of Biogeography, 2005, 32(11):2007-2014 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01367.x
[16]MARSHALL E J P, MOONEN A C. Field margins in northern Europe:Their functions and interactions with agriculture[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2002, 89(1/2):5-21
[17]张旭珠, 常虹, 张鑫, 等.农业景观步甲多样性时间格局及其与景观结构的关系[J].生态学杂志, 2012, 31(12):3127-3132 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxzz201212023
ZHANG X Z, CHANG H, ZHANG X, et al. Temporal patterns of carabid beetle diversity in agro-landscape in relation to landscape structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2012, 31(12):3127-3132 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxzz201212023
[18]NG K, BARTON P S, MACFADYEN S, et al. Beetle's responses to edges in fragmented landscapes are driven by adjacent farmland use, season and cross-habitat movement[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2018, 33(1):109-125 doi: 10.1007/s10980-017-0587-7
[19]áVILA A C, STENERT C, RODRIGUES E N L, et al. Habitat structure determines spider diversity in highland ponds[J]. Ecological Research, 2017, 32(3):359-367 doi: 10.1007/s11284-017-1442-7
[20]TSCHARNTKE T, KLEIN A M, KRUESS A, et al. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management[J]. Ecology Letters, 2005, 8(8):857-874 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x
[21]SAMU F, SUNDERLAND K D, TOPPING C J, et al. A spider population in flux:Selection and abandonment of artificial web-sites and the importance of intraspecific interactions in Lephthyphantes tenuis (Araneae:Linyphiidae) in wheat[J]. Oecologia, 1996, 106(2):228-239 doi: 10.1007/BF00328603
[22]郑国, 杨效东, 李枢强.西双版纳地区六种林型地表蜘蛛多样性比较研究[J].昆虫学报, 2009, 52(8):875-884 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=kcxb200908008
ZHENG G, YANG X D, LI S Q. Biodiversity of ground-dwelling spider in six forest types in Xishuangbanna, S.W. China[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 2009, 52(8):875-884 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=kcxb200908008
[23]刘文惠, 胡懿君, 胡文超, 等.苜蓿邻作麦田地表步甲和蜘蛛种群动态及其对苜蓿刈割的响应[J].应用生态学报, 2014, 25(9):2677-2682 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yystxb201409031
LIU W H, HU Y J, HU W C, et al. Population dynamics of ground carabid beetles and spiders in a wheat field along the wheat-alfalfa interface and their response to alfalfa mowing[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(9):2677-2682 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yystxb201409031
[24]胡文超, 刘军和, 贺达汉.苜蓿田地表蜘蛛边缘效应及苜蓿刈割后的溢出效应[J].植物保护学报, 2018, 45(4):773-781 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zwbhxb201804016
HU W C, LIU J H, HE D H. Edge effect of ground-dwelling spiders and spillover effect after alfalfa mowing in alfalfa fields of Yinchuan area[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2018, 45(4):773-781 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zwbhxb201804016
[25]张旭珠, 韩印, 宇振荣, 等.半自然农田边界与相邻农田步甲和蜘蛛的时空分布[J].应用生态学报, 2017, 28(6):1879-1888 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yystxb201706017
ZHANG X Z, HAN Y, YU Z R, et al. Spatio-temporal distribution of carabids and spiders between semi-natural field margin and the adjacent crop fields in agricultural landscape[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(6):1879-1888 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yystxb201706017
[26]赵爽, 宋博, 丁圣彦, 等.黄河下游农业景观中景观结构和生境特征对林表生蜘蛛多样性的影响[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(6):1816-1825 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201706008
ZHAO S, SONG B, DING S Y, et al. Effects of landscape structure and habitat characteristics on spider diversity in the agro-landscape along the lower reaches of the Yellow River[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(6):1816-1825 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201706008
[27]PéREZ-GUERRERO S, GELAN-BEGNA A, VARGAS-OSUNA E. Impact of Cheiracanthium pelasgicum (Araneae:Miturgidae) and Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera:Chrysopidae) intraguild predation on the potential control of cotton pest Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae)[J]. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 2014, 24(2):216-228 doi: 10.1080/09583157.2013.855167
[28]NYFFELER M, SUNDERLAND K D. Composition, abundance and pest control potential of spider communities in agroecosystems:A comparison of European and US studies[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2003, 95(2/3):579-612 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222510999_Composition_abundance_and_pest_control_potential_of_spider_communities_in_agroecosystems_A_comparison_of_European_and_US_studies
[29]WHITEHOUSE M E A, HARDWICK S, SCHOLZ B C G, et al. Evidence of a latitudinal gradient in spider diversity in Australian cotton[J]. Austral Ecology, 2009, 34(1):10-23 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=10.1111/j.1442-9993.2008.01874.x
[30]S?MME L, BLOCK W. Adaptations to alpine and polar environments in insects and other terrestrial arthropods[M]//LEE R E, DENLINGER D L. Insects at Low Temperature. Boston, MA: Springer, 1991
[31]宋大祥, 朱明生.河北动物志:蜘蛛类[M].石家庄:河北科学技术出版社, 2001
SONG D X, ZHU M S. The Spiders of Hebei[M]. Shijiazhuang:Hebei Science & Technology Press, 2001
[32]朱明生, 张保石.河南蜘蛛志:蛛形纲:蜘蛛目[M].北京:科学出版社, 2011
ZHU M S, ZHANG B S. The Spiders of Henan[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2011
[33]SONG D X, ZHU M S, CHEN J. The Spiders of China[M]. Shijiazhuang:Hebei Science & Technology Press, 1999
[34]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M]. 3版.北京:中国农业出版社, 2000
BAO S D. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 2000
[35]HAMMER ?, HARPER D A T, RYAN P D. PAST:Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis[J]. Palaeontologia Electronica, 2001, 4(1):1-9 http://www.researchgate.net/publication/259640226_PAST_PALEONTOLOGICAL_STATISTICS_SOFTWARE_PACKAGE_FOR_EDUCATION_AND_DATA_ANALYSIS
[36]卢纹岱. SPSS统计分析[M]. 4版.北京:电子工业出版社, 2010
LU W D. SPSS Statistical Analysis[M]. 4th ed. Beijing:Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2010
[37]张金屯.数量生态学[M].北京:科学出版社, 2004
ZHANG J T. Quantitative Ecology[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2004
[38]INGRAO A J, SCHMIDT J, JUBENVILLE J, et al. Biocontrol on the edge:Field margin habitats in asparagus fields influence natural enemy-pest interactions[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2017, 243:47-54 https://europepmc.org/article/AGR/IND605671303
[39]MAGURA T. Carabids and forest edge:Spatial pattern and edge effect[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002, 157(1/3):23-37 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037811270000654X
[40]HOLLAND M M, RISSER P G. The role of landscape boundaries in the management and restoration of Changing environments: Introduction[M]//HOLLAND M M, RISSER P G, NAIMAN R J, et al. Ecotones. Boston, MA: Springer, 1991
[41]STENCHLY K, CLOUGH Y, BUCHORI D, et al. Spider web guilds in cacao agroforestry-comparing tree, plot and landscape-scale management[J]. Diversity and Distributions, 2011, 17(4):748-756 doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00774.x
[42]SUNDERLAND K, SAMU F. Effects of agricultural diversification on the abundance, distribution, and pest control potential of spiders:A review[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2000, 95(1):1-13 doi: 10.1046/j.1570-7458.2000.00635.x
[43]段美春.农业景观的时空格局对植物和节肢动物多样性的影响研究[D].北京: 中国农业大学, 2016: 5-59 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10019-1017000844.htm
DUAN M C. The impact of spatial and temporal structure of agriculture landscape on plant and arthropod diversity[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2016: 5-59 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10019-1017000844.htm
[44]PFISTER S C, SCH?FER R B, SCHIRMEL J, et al. Effects of hedgerows and riparian margins on aerial web-building spiders in cereal fields[J]. Journal of Arachnology, 2015, 43(3):400-405 doi: 10.1636/0161-8202-43.3.400
[45]AAVIK T, LIIRA J. Quantifying the effect of organic farming, field boundary type and landscape structure on the vegetation of field boundaries[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2010, 135(3):178-186 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=154fcb9c0c57558a4be34529e58a7072
[46]TSCHARNTKE T, TYLIANAKIS J M, RAND T A, et al. Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes-eight hypotheses[J]. Biological Reviews, 2012, 87(3):661-685 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x
[47]FAHY O, GORMALLY M. A comparison of plant and carabid beetle communities in an Irish oak woodland with a nearby conifer plantation and clear felled site[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 1998, 110(1/3):263-273 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=f8be6081d8129c21fdad296719f2bb73
[48]SOUZA A F, RAMOS N P, PIZO M A, et al. Afforestation effects on vegetation structure and diversity of grasslands in southern Brazil:The first years[J]. Journal for Nature Conservation, 2013, 21(1):56-62 doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2012.10.002
[49]LACHANCE D, LAVOIE C, DESROCHERS A. The impact of peatland afforestation on plant and bird diversity in southeastern Québec[J]. écoscience, 2005, 12(2):161-171 doi: 10.2980/i1195-6860-12-2-161.1
[50]SANTOS T, TELLERíA J L, DíAZ M, et al. Evaluating the benefits of CAP reforms:Can afforestations restore bird diversity in Mediterranean Spain?[J]. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2006, 7(6):483-495 doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2005.11.001
[51]CARVALHEIRO L G, SEYMOUR C L, NICOLSON S W, et al. Creating patches of native flowers facilitates crop pollination in large agricultural fields:Mango as a case study[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 49(6):1373-1383 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02217.x
[52]OPATOVSKY I, LUBIN Y. Coping with abrupt decline in habitat quality:Effects of harvest on spider abundance and movement[J]. Acta Oecologica, 2012, 41:14-19 doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2012.03.001
[53]HADDAD N M, BRUDVIG L A, CLOBERT J, et al. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth's ecosystems[J]. Science Advances, 2015, 1(2):e1500052 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500052
[54]?BERG S. Influence of landscape structure and farming practice on body condition and fecundity of wolf spiders[J]. Basic & Applied Ecology, 2009, 10(7):614-621 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=46c89fbfcf446cd8b19f29b76ad08cb6
[55]王智, 颜亨梅, 王洪全.低剂量农药对稻田蜘蛛控虫力的影响[J].生态学报, 2002, 22(3):346-351 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb200203009
WANG Z, YAN H M, WANG H Q. The influence of low-dose pesticides on the insect-control power of paddy field spiders[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2002, 22(3):346-351 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb200203009

相关话题/农业 结构 生态 北京 干扰