朱大美,
聂小东,
刘唱唱,
李忠武,,
刘俊宇,
张光叶,
肖林辉,
张宇婷
湖南师范大学资源与环境科学学院 长沙 410081
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目U19A2047
湖南省教育厅重点项目18A044
湖南省研究生科研创新项目CX2018B298
详细信息
作者简介:邓楚雄, 主要研究方向为资源评价与生态经济。E-mail:dcxppd@hunnu.edu.cn
通讯作者:李忠武, 主要研究方向为土壤侵蚀与碳循环。E-mail:lzw17002@hunnu.edu.cn
中图分类号:K9计量
文章访问数:316
HTML全文浏览量:15
PDF下载量:199
被引次数:0
出版历程
收稿日期:2020-02-03
录用日期:2020-05-29
刊出日期:2020-10-01
Progress of research regarding the trade-offs of ecosystem services
DENG Chuxiong,ZHU Damei,
NIE Xiaodong,
LIU Changchang,
LI Zhongwu,,
LIU Junyu,
ZHANG Guangye,
XIAO Linhui,
ZHANG Yuting
College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
Funds: the National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaU19A2047
the Key Project of Department of Education of Hunan Province18A044
the Postgraduate Scientific Research Innovation Project of Hunan ProvinceCX2018B298
More Information
Corresponding author:LI Zhongwu, E-mail:lzw17002@hunnu.edu.cn
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要
摘要:生态系统服务权衡研究对协调生态环境保护和社会经济发展至关重要。为推动生态系统服务管理和提升人类福祉，本文以Web of Science核心合集（WOS）和中国科学引文数据库（CSCD）为数据源，运用文献计量分析法，系统梳理和总结生态系统服务权衡研究的学科知识基础、科学领域结构和热点变化等发展现状以及最新研究进展。研究表明：1）不同研究层面上，生态系统服务间的权衡关系受外部风险和人类需求、参数选取和服务提供者及区域差异性和不均衡性的影响。2）研究方法主要有基于关系识别和具体表征的权衡分析、权衡模拟和预测的模型量化分析和生态系统服务权衡管理优化的多准则分析3类。3）生态系统服务权衡关键驱动因子为城市化、生态工程和气候变化。基于此，我们认为把握生态系统服务权衡不同研究层面的关联特征、创新和优化生态系统服务权衡研究方法、准确甄别生态系统服务权衡关键驱动因子以及充分整合多维生态系统服务权衡资源搭建数据共享平台是未来研究的重点。
关键词:生态系统服务权衡/
文献计量/
评估方法/
供需特征/
关键驱动因子
Abstract:The extreme intensification of human activities and global climate change have exerted immense pressure on the ecological environment. According to the Millennium Ecosystem Services Assessment, approximately 60% of ecosystem services are in decline globally. Therefore, to better maintain ecological health, promote human well-being, and achieve more sustainability in harmonizing environmental protection and socio-economic development, there remains an urgent need to summarize recent studies on the trade-offs of ecosystem services. In this study, based on the Web of Science Core Collection Database (WOS) and the Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), CiteSpace was used to determine the current situation and analyze the latest research on ecosystem services trade-offs by choosing different techniques to create a co-citation cluster view of the citations, a knowledge map of the co-occurrence of subject structure, and a key word emergence map. The results showed that: 1) the trade-offs between ecosystem services are affected by external risks and human needs at the ecosystem level, parameter selection and service providers at the landscape level, and regional differences and heterogeneity at the regional level. 2) Research methods mainly include three categories: trade-off analysis based on relationship recognition and concrete characterization, a module-based quantitative analysis of trade-off simulation and prediction, and multi-criterion analysis toward the optimization of ecosystem service trade-off management. 3) Urbanization, ecological engineering, and climate change are three key drivers of the trade-offs associated with ecosystem services. Most of the trade-offs between supply services, regulation, and support services are caused by urbanization. Ecological engineering improves ecosystem regulation and support services, but reduces supply services to some extent. Global climate change increases external risks while decreasing ecosystem service provision, regulation, and support functions. Based on this analysis, understanding the associated characteristics of ecosystem service trade-offs at various research levels, modifying and innovating study methods, identifying the major factors, and finally, integrating resources to build a data-sharing platform for ecosystem service trade-offs should be the focus of future research.
Key words:Ecosystem services trade-offs/
Literature statistical analysis/
Assessment methods/
Supply and demand characteristics/
Key driving factors
HTML全文
图1WOS(a)和CSCD(b)数据库题录文献共被引聚类视图
Figure1.Bibliographic literature co-citation clustering view in WOS (a) and CSCD (b) databases
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图2WOS和CSCD数据库题录文献主要研究方向的共现知识图谱
Figure2.Bibliographic literature co-occurrence knowledge map of main research directions in WOS and CSCD databases
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片表1WOS数据库中前16个关键词突现表
Table1.Top 16 keywords with the strongest citation bursts in WOS database
| Keyword | Year | Strength | Begin | End | 2005-2019 |
| need | 2005 | 3.087 1 | 2006 | 2013 | ▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
| water quality | 2005 | 2.719 4 | 2008 | 2014 | ▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂ |
| wetland | 2005 | 4.327 6 | 2009 | 2014 | ▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂ |
| economic value | 2005 | 2.514 9 | 2009 | 2011 | ▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
| benefit | 2005 | 2.671 0 | 2011 | 2012 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
| ecology | 2005 | 4.896 9 | 2011 | 2014 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂ |
| valuation | 2005 | 2.627 3 | 2011 | 2012 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
| gi | 2005 | 3.290 7 | 2013 | 2016 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▂▂▂ |
| habitat | 2005 | 3.605 0 | 2013 | 2014 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂▂ |
| indicator | 2005 | 4.422 3 | 2014 | 2016 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂ |
| environment | 2005 | 2.572 7 | 2013 | 2014 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂▂ |
| the United States | 2005 | 2.722 9 | 2015 | 2016 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂ |
| deforestation | 2005 | 2.722 9 | 2015 | 2016 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂ |
| payment | 2005 | 2.722 9 | 2015 | 2016 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂ |
| urban expansion | 2005 | 2.971 9 | 2017 | 2019 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃ |
| InVEST model | 2005 | 3.490 8 | 2017 | 2019 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃ |
下载: 导出CSV表2CSCD数据库中前12个关键词突现表
Table2.Top 12 keywords with the strongest citation bursts in CSCD database
| 关键词 | Keyword | Year | Strength | Begin | End | 2007-2019 |
| 生态系统服务 | Ecosystem services | 2007 | 3.969 7 | 2007 | 2014 | ▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂ |
| 土壤保持 | Soil conservation | 2007 | 1.271 3 | 2013 | 2014 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂▂ |
| 权衡 | Tradeoffs | 2007 | 1.827 6 | 2015 | 2016 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂ |
| 生态系统 | Ecosystem | 2007 | 1.409 6 | 2015 | 2016 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂ |
| 生态服务价值 | Eco-services value | 2007 | 0.946 9 | 2015 | 2016 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂ |
| 价值评估 | Value evaluation | 2007 | 0.933 5 | 2015 | 2016 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂ |
| 生态用地 | Ecological land | 2007 | 0.933 5 | 2015 | 2016 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂ |
| InVEST模型 | InVEST model | 2007 | 0.229 6 | 2015 | 2016 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂ |
| 生态安全 | Ecological security | 2007 | 1.010 5 | 2017 | 2019 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃ |
| 生态系统服务价值 | Ecosystem services value | 2007 | 1.010 5 | 2017 | 2019 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃ |
| 京津冀城市群 | Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei city cluster | 2007 | 0.669 3 | 2017 | 2019 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃ |
| 生态 | Ecology | 2007 | 0.669 3 | 2017 | 2019 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃ |
下载: 导出CSV表3生态系统服务权衡模拟与预测模型
Table3.Models of ecosystem service trade-offs simulation and prediction
| 模型分类 Model classification | 具体模型 Concrete model | 优点 Advantage | 不足 Disadvantage |
| 生态生产功能模型 Ecological production function model | InVEST | 参数需求少、操作灵活、应用广泛、可视化表达强、认可度高 Less parameters requirement, flexible operation, wide application, strong visual expression and high recognition | 参数设置依据不充分、忽略生物物理过程 Insufficient basis for parameter setting, ignoring biophysical processes |
| InFOREST | 处开发初级阶段, 推广少 In the initial stage of development, less promotion | ||
| MIMES | 能较好地模拟生态系统服务时空动态功能 Better simulate the spatiotemporal dynamic functions of ecosystem services | 模型尚不成熟, 有很多模块正在开发之中 The model is not yet mature and many modules are under development | |
| EPM | 考虑了生态、经济和居民生活质量等问题 Consider ecological, economic, and quality of life of residents | 可推广性差 Poor scalability | |
| SolVES | 适用性广 Wide applicability | 只能对生态系统服务社会价值进行量化 Only quantify the social value of ecosystem services | |
| SAORES | 为土地利用格局优化和关键生态系统服务最大化提供借鉴 Provide references for optimization of land use patterns and maximization of key ecosystem services | 模型评估的准确性校验及不确定性分析有所忽略 The accuracy check and uncertainty analysis of the model evaluation are ignored | |
| EcoMetric | 输入地面调查的物理环境因子, 结果较准确 Enter the physical environmental factors of the ground survey with more accurate results | ||
| 人类偏好模型 Human preference model | EcoAIM | 利于多种生态系统服务权衡方法间的比较 Facilitate comparisons among multiple ecosystem service trade-offs | 依靠管理者的决策, 主观性较强 Reliance on managerial decision making, strong subjectivity |
| ESValue | 利于比较现实产出和预期产出之间的关系, 有助于确立最合适的自然资源管理策略 Facilitate comparison of the relationship between actual and expected output, and help to establish the most appropriate natural resource management strategy | 依赖专家经验, 主观性较强, 主要用于美国地区 Reliance on expert experience, strong subjectivity, mainly used in the United States | |
| 价值转移模型 Value transfer shift model | ARIES | 智能化实现生态系统服务功能的评估, 应用前景好 Intelligent assessment of ecosystem service functions and good application prospects | 数据分辨率差、评估结果精度低、目前只适用于美国及墨西哥部分区域 Poor data resolution, low accuracy of evaluation results, currently only applicable to parts of the United States and Mexico |
| NAIS | 基于文献数据确定生态系统服务价值, 忽略了时空差异性 Determine ecosystem service value based on literature data, ignoring spatio-temporal differences |
下载: 导出CSV参考文献
| [1] | BERGER T, BROOKNER E. Practical design of infrared detector circuits[J]. Applied Optics, 1967, 6(7):1189-1193 doi: 10.1364/AO.6.001189 |
| [2] | 郝梦雅, 任志远, 孙艺杰, 等.关中盆地生态系统服务的权衡与协同关系动态分析[J].地理研究, 2017, 36(3):592-602 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dlyj201703017 HAO M Y, REN Z Y, SUN Y J, et al. The dynamic analysis of trade-off and synergy of ecosystem services in the Guanzhong Basin[J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3):592-602 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dlyj201703017 |
| [3] | Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being[M]. Washington, DC:Island Press, 2005:1-12 |
| [4] | 戴尔阜, 王晓莉, 朱建佳, 等.生态系统服务权衡:方法、模型与研究框架[J].地理研究, 2016, 35(6):1005-1016 DAI E F, WANG X L, ZHU J J, et al. Methods, tools and research framework of ecosystem service trade-offs[J]. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(6):1005-1016 |
| [5] | 李双成, 张才玉, 刘金龙, 等.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题[J].地理研究, 2013, 32(8):1379-1390 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dlyj201308001 LI S C, ZHANG C Y, LIU J L, et al. The tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services:Research progress, development trend, and themes of geography[J]. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(8):1379-1390 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dlyj201308001 |
| [6] | 李鹏, 姜鲁光, 封志明, 等.生态系统服务竞争与协同研究进展[J].生态学报, 2012, 32(16):5219-5229 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201216031 LI P, JIANG L G, FENG Z M, et al. Research progress on trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services:An overview[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(16):5219-5229 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201216031 |
| [7] | 陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学学研究, 2015, 33(2):242-253 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=kxxyj201502009 CHEN Y, CHEN C M, LIU Z Y, et al. The methodology function of CiteSpace mapping knowledge domains[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2015, 33(2):242-253 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=kxxyj201502009 |
| [8] | 卫军朝, 蔚海燕.科学结构及演化分析方法研究综述[J].图书与情报, 2011, (4):48-52 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=tsyqb201104012 WEI J C, WEI H Y. Review on analysis methods of science structure and evolution[J]. Library and Information, 2011, (4):48-52 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=tsyqb201104012 |
| [9] | 陈静飞, 王怀璋, 梁婷.基于CiteSpace的全球炭疽研究演化及其热点可视化分析[J].微生物学报, doi: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20190589 CHEN J F, WANG H Z, LIANG T. Global anthrax research evolution and hot spot visualization analysis based on CiteSpace[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, doi: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20190589 |
| [10] | 刘婧, 江沁雨, 常李艳.近20年来国内外数字阅读研究热点与进展分析[J].图书馆, 2020, (2):80-87 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=tusg202002013 LIU J, JIANG Q Y, CHANG L Y. Analysis of hotspots and progress in digital reading research at home and abroad in the recent 20 years[J]. Library, 2020, (2):80-87 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=tusg202002013 |
| [11] | 王梓懿, 沈正平, 杜明伟.基于CiteSpace Ⅲ的国内新型城镇化研究进展与热点分析[J].经济地理, 2017, 37(1):32-39 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=jjdl201701005 WANG Z Y, SHEN Z P, DU M W. The research status and hotspots of new urbanization based on CiteSpace Ⅲ[J]. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(1):32-39 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=jjdl201701005 |
| [12] | CROUZAT E, MOUCHET M, TURKELBOOM F, et al. Assessing bundles of ecosystem services from regional to landscape scale:Insights from the French Alps[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 52(5):1145-1155 doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12502 |
| [13] | SCHRODER S A, TóTH S F, DEAL R L, et al. Multi-objective optimization to evaluate tradeoffs among forest ecosystem services following fire hazard reduction in the Deschutes National Forest, USA[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2016, 22:328-347 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.08.006 |
| [14] | CADEMUS R, ESCOBEDO F J, MCLAUGHLIN D, et al. Analyzing trade-offs, synergies, and drivers among timber production, carbon sequestration, and water yield in Pinus elliotii forests in Southeastern USA[J]. Forests, 2014, 5(6):1409-1431 doi: 10.3390/f5061409 |
| [15] | OLSCHEWSKI R, KLEIN A M, TSCHARNTKE F. Economic trade-offs between carbon sequestration, timber production, and crop pollination in tropical forested landscapes[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2010, 7(3):314-319 doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.01.002 |
| [16] | CHISHOLM R A. Trade-offs between ecosystem services:Water and carbon in a biodiversity hotspot[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(10):1973-1987 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.013 |
| [17] | CORBERA E, BROWN K. Building institutions to trade ecosystem services:Marketing forest carbon in Mexico[J]. World Development, 2008, 36(10):1956-1979 doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.09.010 |
| [18] | CASTRO A J, VERBURG P H, MARTíN-LóPEZ B, et al. Ecosystem service trade-offs from supply to social demand:A landscape-scale spatial analysis[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 132:102-110 doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.009 |
| [19] | POWER A G. Ecosystem services and agriculture:Tradeoffs and synergies[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences, 2010, 365(1554):2959-2971 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0143 |
| [20] | RAUDSEPP-HEARNE C, PETERSON G D, BENNETT E M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(11):5242-5247 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907284107 |
| [21] | MEYER B C, GRABAUM R. MULBO:Model framework for multicriteria landscape assessment and optimisation. A support system for spatial land use decisions[J]. Landscape Research, 2008, 33(2):155-179 doi: 10.1080/01426390801907428 |
| [22] | BURKHARD B, KROLL F, NEDKOV S, et al. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21:17-29 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 |
| [23] | SYRBE R U, WALZ U. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services:Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21:80-88 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013 |
| [24] | 李晶, 李红艳, 张良.关中-天水经济区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J].生态学报, 2016, 36(10):3053-3062 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201610030 LI J, LI H Y, ZHANG L. Ecosystem service trade-offs in the Guanzhong-Tianshui economic region of China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(10):3053-3062 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201610030 |
| [25] | 钱彩云, 巩杰, 张金茜, 等.甘肃白龙江流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系[J].地理学报, 2018, 73(5):868-879 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dlxb201805007 QIAN C Y, GONG J, ZHANG J X, et al. Change and tradeoffs-synergies analysis on watershed ecosystem services:A case study of Bailongjiang Watershed, Gansu[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(5):868-879 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dlxb201805007 |
| [26] | 王鹏涛, 张立伟, 李英杰, 等.汉江上游生态系统服务权衡与协同关系时空特征[J].地理学报, 2017, 72(11):2064-2078 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dlxb201711011 WANG P T, ZHANG L W, LI Y J, et al. Spatio-temporal characteristics of the trade-off and synergy relationships among multiple ecosystem services in the Upper Reaches of Hanjiang River Basin[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(11):2064-2078 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dlxb201711011 |
| [27] | 尹礼唱, 王晓峰, 张琨, 等.国家屏障区生态系统服务权衡与协同[J].地理研究, 2019, 38(9):2162-2172 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dlyj201909005 YIN L C, WANG X F, ZHANG K, et al. Trade-offs and synergy between ecosystem services in National Barrier Zone[J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(9):2162-2172 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dlyj201909005 |
| [28] | 孙泽祥, 刘志锋, 何春阳, 等.中国快速城市化干燥地区的生态系统服务权衡关系多尺度分析——以呼包鄂榆地区为例[J].生态学报, 2016, 36(15):4881-4891 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201615034 SUN Z X, LIU Z F, HE C Y, et al. Multi-scale analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs in urbanizing drylands of China:A case study in the Hohhot-Baotou-Ordos-Yulin region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(15):4881-4891 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201615034 |
| [29] | 孙艺杰, 任志远, 郝梦雅, 等.黄土高原生态系统服务权衡与协同时空变化及影响因素——以延安市为例[J].生态学报, 2019, 39(10):3443-3454 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201910004 SUN Y J, REN Z Y, HAO M Y, et al. Spatial and temporal changes in the synergy and trade-off between ecosystem services, and its influencing factors in Yan'an, Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(10):3443-3454 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201910004 |
| [30] | 武文欢, 彭建, 刘焱序, 等.鄂尔多斯市生态系统服务权衡与协同分析[J].地理科学进展, 2017, 36(12):1571-1581 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dlkxjz201712013 WU W H, PENG J, LIU Y X, et al. Tradeoffs and synergies between ecosystem services in Ordos City[J]. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(12):1571-1581 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dlkxjz201712013 |
| [31] | 冉凤维, 罗志军, 吴佳平, 等.鄱阳湖地区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系的时空格局[J].应用生态学报, 2019, 30(3):995-1004 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yystxb201903033 RAN F W, LUO Z J, WU J P, et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of the trade-off and synergy relationship among ecosystem services in Poyang Lake Region, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(3):995-1004 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yystxb201903033 |
| [32] | 税伟, 杜勇, 王亚楠, 等.闽三角城市群生态系统服务权衡的时空动态与情景模拟[J].生态学报, 2019, 39(14):5188-5197 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201914017 SHUI W, DU Y, WANG Y N, et al. Spatio-temporal dynamics and scenarios simulation of trade-offs between ecosystem services in Min Delta urban agglomeration[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(14):5188-5197 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201914017 |
| [33] | 彭建, 胡晓旭, 赵明月, 等.生态系统服务权衡研究进展:从认知到决策[J].地理学报, 2017, 72(6):960-973 http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dlxb201706002 PENG J, HU X X, ZHAO M Y, et al. Research progress on ecosystem service trade-offs:From cognition to decision-making[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(6):960-973 http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dlxb201706002 |
| [34] | TIAN Y C, WANG S J, BAI X Y, et al. Trade-offs among ecosystem services in a typical karst watershed, SW China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 566/567:1297-1308 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.190 |
| [35] | 张宇硕, 吴殿廷.京津冀地区生态系统服务权衡的多尺度特征与影响因素解析[J].地域研究与开发, 2019, 38(3):141-147 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dyyjykf201903026 ZHANG Y S, WU D T. Multi-scale analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and associated influencing factors in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2019, 38(3):141-147 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dyyjykf201903026 |
| [36] | 曹祺文, 卫晓梅, 吴健生.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展[J].生态学杂志, 2016, 35(11):3102-3111 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxzz201611033 CAO Q W, WEI X M, WU J S. A review on the tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem services[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(11):3102-3111 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxzz201611033 |
| [37] | DENG X Z, LI Z H, GIBSON J. A review on trade-off analysis of ecosystem services for sustainable land-use management[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016, 26(7):953-968 doi: 10.1007/s11442-016-1309-9 |
| [38] | 吕一河, 张立伟, 王江磊.生态系统及其服务保护评估:指标与方法[J].应用生态学报, 2013, 24(5):1237-1243 http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb201305008 LYU Y H, ZHANG L W, WANG J L. Assessment of ecosystem and its services conservation:Indicators and methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(5):1237-1243 http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb201305008 |
| [39] | HUBER R, BUGMANN H, BUTTLER A, et al. Sustainable land-use practices in European mountain regions under global change:An integrated research approach[J]. Ecology and Society, 2013, 18(3):37 https://core.ac.uk/display/18451113 |
| [40] | BARBIER E B, KOCH E W, SILLIMAN B R, et al. Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values[J]. Science, 2008, 319(5861):321-323 doi: 10.1126/science.1150349 |
| [41] | 王雅, 蒙吉军, 齐杨, 等.基于InVEST模型的生态系统管理综述[J].生态学杂志, 2015, 34(12):3526-3532 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxzz201512035 WANG Y, MENG J J, QI Y, et al. Review of ecosystem management based on the InVEST model[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(12):3526-3532 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxzz201512035 |
| [42] | NELSON E, MENDOZA G, REGETZ J, et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009, 7(1):4-11 doi: 10.1890/080023 |
| [43] | VIGERSTOL K L, AUKEMA J E. A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2011, 92(10):2403-2409 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.040 |
| [44] | PIAO S L, CIAIS P, HUANG Y, et al. The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China[J]. Nature, 2010, 467(7311):43-51 doi: 10.1038/nature09364 |
| [45] | DAILY G C, POLASKY S, GOLDSTEIN J, et al. Ecosystem services in decision making:Time to deliver[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009, 7(1):21-28 doi: 10.1890/080025 |
| [46] | 包蕊, 刘峰, 张建平, 等.基于多目标线性规划的甲积峪小流域生态系统服务权衡优化[J].生态学报, 2018, 38(3):812-828 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201803008 BAO R, LIU F, ZHANG J P, et al. Multi-objective linear programming-based trade-off and optimization of the ecosystem services in Jiajiyu small watershed in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(3):812-828 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201803008 |
| [47] | 张渝萌, 李晶, 曾莉, 等.基于OWA多属性决策的生态系统服务最优保护区选择研究——以渭河流域(关天段)为例[J].中国农业科学, 2019, 52(12):2114-2127 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgnykx201912009 ZHANG Y M, LI J, ZENG L, et al. Optimal protected area selection:based on multiple attribute decision making method and ecosystem service research-Illustrated by Guanzhong-Tianshui economic region section of the Weihe River Basin[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(12):2114-2127 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgnykx201912009 |
| [48] | SUN X, LU Z M, LI F, et al. Analyzing spatio-temporal changes and trade-offs to support the supply of multiple ecosystem services in Beijing, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 94:117-129 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.049 |
| [49] | LI B J, CHEN D X, WU S H, et al. Spatio-temporal assessment of urbanization impacts on ecosystem services:Case study of Nanjing City, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 71:416-427 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.017 |
| [50] | KAREIVA P, WATTS S, MCDONALD R, et al. Domesticated nature:Shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare[J]. Science, 2007, 316(5833):1866-1869 doi: 10.1126/science.1140170 |
| [51] | 赵茹欣, 王会肖, 董宇轩.气候变化对关中地区粮食产量的影响及趋势分析[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(4):467-479 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2020-0401&flag=1 ZHAO R X, WANG H X, DONG Y X. Impact of climate change on grain yield and its trend across Guanzhong region[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(4):467-479 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2020-0401&flag=1 |
| [52] | YAN T T, WANG J X, HUANG J K. Urbanization, agricultural water use, and regional and national crop production in China[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2015, 318:226-235 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.12.021 |
| [53] | LYU R F, ZHANG J M, XU M Q, et al. Impacts of urbanization on ecosystem services and their temporal relations:A case study in northern Ningxia, China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 77:163-173 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.022 |
| [54] | WEI H J, FAN W G, WANG X C, et al. Integrating supply and social demand in ecosystem services assessment:A review[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 25:15-27 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.017 |
| [55] | BRANDT P, ABSON D J, DELLASALA D A, et al. Multifunctionality and biodiversity:Ecosystem services in temperate rainforests of the Pacific Northwest, USA[J]. Biological Conservation, 2014, 169:362-371 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.003 |
| [56] | RUNTING R K, BRYAN B A, DEE L E, et al. Incorporating climate change into ecosystem service assessments and decisions:A review[J]. Global Change Biology, 2017, 23(1):28-41 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27507077 |
| [57] | 王晓峰, 马雪, 冯晓明, 等.重点脆弱生态区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系时空特征[J].生态学报, 2019, 39(20):7344-7355 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201920002 WANG X F, MA X, FENG X M, et al. Spatial-temporal characteristics of trade-off and synergy of ecosystem services in key vulnerable ecological areas in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(20):7344-7355 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201920002 |
| [58] | FANG J Y, GUO Z D, HU H F, et al. Forest biomass carbon sinks in East Asia, with special reference to the relative contributions of forest expansion and forest growth[J]. Global Change Biology, 2014, 20(6):2019-2030 doi: 10.1111/gcb.12512 |
| [59] | 伍方骥, 刘娜, 胡培雷, 等.典型喀斯特洼地植被恢复过程中土壤碳氮储量动态及其对极端内涝灾害的响应[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(3):429-437 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2020-0313&flag=1 WU F J, LIU N, HU P L, et al. Soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics during vegetation restoration and their responses to extreme water-logging disasters in a typical karst depression[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(3):429-437 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2020-0313&flag=1 |
| [60] | WU X T, WANG S, FU B J, et al. Land use optimization based on ecosystem service assessment:A case study in the Yanhe watershed[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 72:303-312 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.003 |
| [61] | DYMOND J R, AUSSEIL A G E, EKANAYAKE J C, et al. Tradeoffs between soil, water, and carbon-A national scale analysis from New Zealand[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 95(1):124-131 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=f98957a473b18baebe027d28cbc2fce5 |
| [62] | JACKSON R B, JOBBáGY E G, AVISSAR R, et al. Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration[J]. Science, 2005, 310(5756):1944-1947 doi: 10.1126/science.1119282 |
| [63] | ONAINDIA M, DE MANUEL B F, MADARIAGA L, et al. Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 289:1-9 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.010 |
| [64] | LEE J M, PARK Y S, KUM D, et al. Assessing the effect of watershed slopes on recharge/baseflow and soil erosion[J]. Paddy and Water Environment, 2014, 12(S1):S169-S183 doi: 10.1007/s10333-014-0448-9 |
| [65] | WANG S, FU B J, HE C S, et al. A comparative analysis of forest cover and catchment water yield relationships in northern China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2011, 262(7):1189-1198 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.013 |
| [66] | 沈永平, 王国亚. IPCC第一工作组第五次评估报告对全球气候变化认知的最新科学要点[J].冰川冻土, 2013, 35(5):1068-1076 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=bcdt201305002 SHEN Y P, WANG G Y. Key findings and assessment results of IPCC WGI fifth assessment report[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2013, 35(5):1068-1076 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=bcdt201305002 |
| [67] | BHATT U S, WALKER D A, RAYNOLDS M K, et al. Recent declines in warming and vegetation greening trends over pan-Arctic tundra[J]. Remote Sensing, 2013, 5(9):4229-4254 doi: 10.3390/rs5094229 |
| [68] | 何洁琳, 黄卓, 谢敏, 等.广西生物多样性优先保护区的气候变化风险评估[J].生态学杂志, 2017, 36(9):2581-2591 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxzz201709026 HE J L, HUANG Z, XIE M, et al. Risk assessment of climate change in Guangxi biodiversity conservation priority areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(9):2581-2591 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxzz201709026 |
| [69] | HOEGH-GULDBERG O, MUMBY P J, HOOTEN A J, et al. Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification[J]. Science, 2007, 318(5857):1737-1742 doi: 10.1126/science.1152509 |
| [70] | MIZYED N. Impacts of climate change on water resources availability and agricultural water demand in the west bank[J]. Water Resources Management, 2009, 23(10):2015-2029 doi: 10.1007/s11269-008-9367-0 |
| [71] | 陈怀亮, 李树岩.气候变暖背景下河南省夏玉米花期高温灾害风险预估[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(3):337-348 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2020-0303&flag=1 CHEN H L, LI S Y. Prediction of high temperature disaster risks during summer maize flowering under future climate warming background in Henan Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(3):337-348 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2020-0303&flag=1 |
| [72] | MADER T L, FRANK K L, HARRINGTON J A JR, et al. Potential climate change effects on warm-season livestock production in the Great Plains[J]. Climatic Change, 2009, 97(3/4):529-541 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=3deeeb2f688ce40e29c1ce15446d452c |
| [73] | SCHLENKER W, LOBELL D B. Robust negative impacts of climate change on African agriculture[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2010, 5(1):014010 doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014010 |
| [74] | EVANS C D, MONTEITH D T, COOPER D M. Long-term increases in surface water dissolved organic carbon:Observations, possible causes and environmental impacts[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2005, 137(1):55-71 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.12.031 |
| [75] | PEREIRA H M, LEADLEY P W, PROEN?A V, et al. Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century[J]. Science, 2010, 330(6010):1496-1501 doi: 10.1126/science.1196624 |
| [76] | PAWSON S M, BRIN A, BROCKERHOFF E G, et al. Plantation forests, climate change and biodiversity[J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2013, 22(5):1203-1227 doi: 10.1007/s10531-013-0458-8 |
| [77] | ELMENDORF S C, HENRY G H R, HOLLISTER R D, et al. Plot-scale evidence of tundra vegetation change and links to recent summer warming[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2012, 2(6):453-457 doi: 10.1038/nclimate1465 |
| [78] | GRIFFIN D, ANCHUKAITIS K J. How unusual is the 2012-2014 California drought[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2014, 41(24):9017-9023 doi: 10.1002/2014GL062433 |
| [79] | BOKHORST S, T?MMERVIK H, CALLAGHAN T V, et al. Vegetation recovery following extreme winter warming events in the sub-Arctic estimated using NDVI from remote sensing and handheld passive proximal sensors[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2012, 81:18-25 doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.02.011 |
| [80] | SMITH W N, GRANT B B, DESJARDINS R L, et al. Potential impact of climate change on carbon in agricultural soils in Canada 2000-2099[J]. Climatic Change, 2009, 93(3):319-333 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=80c2836f6dc5a400195bd2a3239c44be |
| [81] | ALBALADEJO J, ORTIZ R, GARCIA-FRANCO N, et al. Land use and climate change impacts on soil organic carbon stocks in semi-arid Spain[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2013, 13(2):265-277 doi: 10.1007/s11368-012-0617-7 |
| [82] | KEEGAN K M, ALBERT M R, MCCONNELL J R, et al. Climate change and forest fires synergistically drive widespread melt events of the Greenland Ice Sheet[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111(22):7964-7967 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405397111 |
| [83] | KASER G, GRO?HAUSER M, Marzeion B. Contribution potential of glaciers to water availability in different climate regimes[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(47):20223-20227 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008162107 |
| [84] | 柳冬青, 张金茜, 巩杰, 等.陇中黄土丘陵区土地利用强度-生态系统服务-人类福祉时空关系研究——以安定区为例[J].生态学报, 2019, 39(2):637-648 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201902025 LIU D Q, ZHANG J X, GONG J, et al. Spatial and temporal relations among land-use intensity, ecosystem services, and human well-being in the Longzhong Loess Hilly Region:A case study of the Anding District, Gansu Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(2):637-648 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201902025 |
| [85] | XU S N, LIU Y F, WANG X, et al. Scale effect on spatial patterns of ecosystem services and associations among them in semi-arid area:A case study in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 598:297-306 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.009 |
| [86] | HICKS C C, GRAHAM N A J, CINNER J E. Synergies and tradeoffs in how managers, scientists, and fishers value coral reef ecosystem services[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2013, 23(6):1444-1453 doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.028 |
| [87] | 黄从红, 杨军, 张文娟.生态系统服务功能评估模型研究进展[J].生态学杂志, 2013, 32(12):3360-3367 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxzz201312035 HUANG C H, YANG J, ZHANG W J. Development of ecosystem services evaluation models:Research progress[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32(12):3360-3367 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxzz201312035 |
| [88] | 傅伯杰, 于丹丹.生态系统服务权衡与集成方法[J].资源科学, 2016, 38(1):1-9 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zykx201601001 FU B J, YU D D. Trade-off analyses and synthetic integrated method of multiple ecosystem services[J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(1):1-9 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zykx201601001 |
| [89] | BENNETT E M, BALVANERA P. The future of production systems in a globalized world[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2007, 5(4):191-198 doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[191:TFOPSI]2.0.CO;2 |
