于爱忠,,
柴强
甘肃农业大学农学院/甘肃省干旱生境作物学重点实验室 兰州 730070
基金项目: 现代农业产业技术体系项目CARS-22-G-12
国家自然科学基金项目31401350
国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项项目201503125-3
详细信息
作者简介:吕汉强, 研究方向为旱地与绿洲农作制。E-mail:1131021518@qq.com
通讯作者:于爱忠, 主要研究方向为节水农业、保护性耕作等。E-mail:yuaizh@gsau.edu.cn
中图分类号:S344计量
文章访问数:460
HTML全文浏览量:3
PDF下载量:673
被引次数:0
出版历程
收稿日期:2019-11-13
录用日期:2020-01-16
刊出日期:2020-05-01
Response of maize yield and water use to different green manure utilization patterns in arid oasis irrigation area
LYU Hanqiang,YU Aizhong,,
CHAI Qiang
College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science in Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730070, China
Funds: the Special Fund for the Industrial Technology System Construction of Modern Agriculture of ChinaCARS-22-G-12
the National Natural Science Foundation of China31401350
the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest of China201503125-3
More Information
Corresponding author:YU Aizhong, E-mail:yuaizh@gsau.edu.cn
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要
摘要:针对绿洲灌区小麦-玉米长期连作,麦后休闲期长、光热水资源利用效率不高等问题,研究麦后复种绿肥对轮作玉米产量及水分利用效率的影响有重要意义。在石羊河流域,于2017—2019年度通过田间试验研究了麦后复种绿肥的不同还田利用方式(全量翻压、地表覆盖免耕、地上部收获后根茬翻压、地上部收获后免耕和不复种绿肥传统翻耕对照)对后茬玉米产量形成和水分利用特征的影响。两年试验结果表明,绿肥地表覆盖免耕和全量翻压处理玉米籽粒产量平均达14 274.9 kg·hm-2和14 687.5 kg·hm-2,较不复种绿肥翻耕处理(对照)显著提高18.2%和20.4%(P < 0.05)。绿肥地表覆盖免耕条件下,玉米穗数、穗粒数、百粒重分别较不复种绿肥翻耕处理(对照)平均高5.4%、9.6%、20.8%(P < 0.05),且较根茬还田处理(翻压、免耕)增幅显著。与此同时,绿肥地表覆盖免耕和全量翻压显著增加玉米叶面积指数、干物质累积量和平均净同化率。绿肥地表覆盖免耕处理水分利用效率平均达24.4 kg·hm-2·mm-1,较不复种绿肥翻耕处理(对照)显著提高29.9%(P < 0.05),该处理较不复种绿肥翻耕处理(对照)显著提高玉米播前土壤贮水量26.9%(P < 0.05),平均达280.7 mm,且该条件下玉米全生育期耗水量显著低于其他绿肥还田处理。绿肥根茬还田处理(翻压、免耕)下,玉米平均水分利用效率分别较不复种绿肥翻耕处理显著高16.7%、16.0%(P < 0.05)。因此,在干旱绿洲灌区,麦后复种绿肥地表覆盖免耕获得玉米高产的同时,实现了水资源的高效利用。
关键词:小麦-玉米轮作/
绿肥利用方式/
玉米/
产量/
水分利用特征
Abstract:With the aim of long-term continuous cropping of wheat and maize in arid oasis irrigation areas, the fallow-period after wheat harvest is long and the utilization efficiency of light, heat, and water resources is relative low; thus, it is important to study the effects of different green manure utilization patterns on maize yield and water use characteristics. In the Shiyang River basin, the effects of different green manure utilization patterns on the yield formation and water use characteristics of maize were studied through a field experiment on the wheat-green manure-maize rotation system. Different green manure utilization patterns included tillage with full quantity of green manure incorporated in the soil (TG), no-tillage with full quantity of green manure mulched on the soil surface (NTG), above ground green manure harvested and tillage with root incorporated in the soil (T), no-tillage with above ground green manure harvested (NT), and conventional tillage without green manure (CT) as the control. The results showed that the average maize grain yield for treatments of NTG and TG reached 14 274.9 kg·hm-2 and 14 687.5 kg·hm-2, respectively, which was 18.2% and 20.4% higher, respectively, than that of CT. This is mainly due to the fact that the number of ears, seed number per ear, and seed weight of maize for NTG were 5.4%, 9.6%, and 20.8% higher, respectively, than those of CT, and the effect was significantly higher than that of root utilization patterns (treatments T and NT). Meanwhile, TG and NTG treatments significantly increased maize leaf area index, dry matter accumulation, and average net assimilation rate. The average water use efficiency of the NTG treatment reached 24.4 kg·hm-2·mm-1, which was 29.9% higher than that of CT, which significantly increased the soil water storage before maize sowing to 26.9%, with an average of 280.7 mm. In addition, under NTG treatment, the water consumption of maize during the whole growth period was significantly lower than that of the other green manure treatments. Under the conditions of green manure root utilization (treatments T and NT), the water use efficiency of maize was 16.7% and 16.0% higher, respectively, than that of CT. Therefore, in the arid oasis irrigation area, for the wheat-green manure-maize rotation system, employing no-till with full quantity of green manure mulched on the soil surface achieves high yield of maize while achieving efficient use of water resources.
Key words:Wheat-maize rotation/
Green manure utilization patterns/
Maize/
Yield/
Water use characteristics
HTML全文

图12017—2019年研究区玉米生育期内月平均降雨量
Figure1.Monthly average precipitation during maize growth period in the study area from 2017 to 2019


图2不同绿肥还田利用方式下玉米干物质累积量动态
不同处理的种植方式如表 1所示。
Figure2.Dynamics of dry matter accumulation of maize under different green manure utilization patterns
The planting method of each treatment is shown in table 1.


图3不同绿肥还田利用方式下玉米平均净同化率
不同处理的种植方式如表 1所示。不同小写字母表示同一年份不同处理间在P < 0.05水平差异显著。
Figure3.Average net assimilation rate of maize under different green manure utilization patterns
The planting method of each treatment is shown in table 1. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different treatments in the same year at P < 0.05 level.


图4不同绿肥还田方式下玉米叶面积指数(LAI)的动态变化
不同处理的种植方式如表 1所示。
Figure4.Dynamics of leaf area index (LAI) of maize under different green manure utilization patterns
The planting method of each treatment is shown in table 1.


图5不同绿肥还田利用方式下玉米平均叶面积指数
不同处理的种植方式如表 1所示。不同小写字母表示同一年份不同处理间在P < 0.05水平差异显著。
Figure5.Average leaf area index (MLAI) of maize under different green manure utilization patterns
The planting method of each treatment is shown in table 1. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different treatments in the same year at P < 0.05 level.


图6不同绿肥还田方式下玉米全生育期总耗水量(A)和玉米播前0~110 cm土层土壤贮水量(B)
不同处理的种植方式如表 1所示。不同小写字母表示同一年份不同处理间在P < 0.05水平差异显著。
Figure6.Total water consumption during the whole growth period of maize (A) and soil water storage of 0-110 cm soil layer before maize sowing (B) under different green manure utilization patterns
The planting method of each treatment is shown in table 1. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different treatments in the same year at P < 0.05 level.


图7不同绿肥还田利用方式下玉米水分利用效率
不同处理的种植方式如表 1所示。不同小写字母表示同一年份不同处理间在P < 0.05水平差异显著。
Figure7.Water use efficiency of maize under different green manure utilization patterns
The planting method of each treatment is shown in table 1. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different treatments in the same year at P < 0.05 level.

表1不同试验处理的绿肥还田方式及作物种植方式
Table1.Green manure utilization and crop planting patterns of different treatments in the experiment
处理 Treatment | 绿肥还田及作物种植方式 Pattern of green manure utilization and crop planting |
CT | 春小麦收获后传统翻耕、休闲 Conventional tillage and leisure without green manure after spring wheat harvest |
TG | 春小麦7月收获后复种绿肥, 10月绿肥全量翻压, 翌年4月覆膜平作玉米 Planting green manure after spring wheat harvest in July, tillage with full quantity of green manure incorporated in the soil in October, and flat planting maize with film mulching in April of the next year |
T | 春小麦7月收获后复种绿肥, 10月地上部收获移除根茬翻压, 翌年4月覆膜平作玉米 Planting green manure after spring wheat harvest in July, harvesting and removing above ground green manure and tillage with root incorporated in the soil in October, and flat planting maize with film mulching in April of the next year |
NTG | 春小麦7月收获后复种绿肥, 10月绿肥地表覆盖免耕, 翌年4月覆膜平作玉米 Planting green manure after spring wheat harvest in July, no-tillage with full quantity of green manure mulched on soil surface in October, and flat planting maize with film mulching in April of the next year |
NT | 春小麦7月收获后复种绿肥, 10月绿肥地上部收获移除免耕, 翌年4月覆膜平作玉米 Planting green manure after spring wheat harvest in July, no-tillage with above ground green manure harvested and removed in October, and flat planting maize with film mulching in April of the next year |

表2不同绿肥还田方式下玉米产量及产量构成因素
Table2.Maize yield and yield components under different green manure utilization patterns
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 籽粒产量 Grain yield (kg·hm-2) | 穗数 Ear number (ears·hm-2) | 穗粒数 Seed number per ear | 百粒重 100-seed weight (g) |
2018 | CT | 11 185.8±235b | 73 256±1 431b | 470±11.2b | 32.0±2.6c |
NT | 11 686.8±168b | 74 274±1 325b | 419±14.6c | 37.6±3.1b | |
NTG | 14 015.3±423a | 77 156±1 502a | 516±10.5a | 40.6±3.4a | |
T | 12 386.0±498b | 74 413±1 322b | 501±14.5a | 34.1±2.9bc | |
TG | 14 372.7±154a | 78 249±1 445a | 492±16.5a | 40.5±3.6a | |
2019 | CT | 12 198.9±142c | 74 117±1 224b | 478±18.6b | 32.8±2.3c |
NT | 13 861.2±201b | 73 356±1 445b | 546±10.5a | 34.6±2.1b | |
NTG | 14 534.4±399a | 78 595±1 448a | 533±12.3a | 41.2±3.5a | |
T | 13 717.5±195b | 74 004±1 223b | 514± 9.8ab | 36.6±3.3ab | |
TG | 15 002.2±268a | 78 891±1 523a | 557± 9.1a | 39.7±2.7a | |
不同处理的种植方式如表 1所示。表中同列不同小写字母表示同一年份各处理间在P < 0.05水平差异显著。The planting method of each treatment is shown in table 1. Different lowercase letters in a column in the same year represent significant differences among treatments at P < 0.05 level. |

参考文献
[1] | HATFIELD J L, BOOTE K J, KIMBALL B A, et al. Climate impacts on agriculture:Implications for crop production[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2011, 103(2):351-370 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/OAPaper/oai_pubmedcentral.nih.gov_3583897 |
[2] | LOBELL D B, SCHLENKER W, COSTA-ROBERTS J. Climate trends and global crop production since 1980[J]. Science, 2011, 333(6042):616-620 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/NSTLQK/NSTL_QKJJ0224479989/ |
[3] | OLESEN J E, TRNKA M, KERSEBAUM K C, et al. Impacts and adaptation of European crop production systems to climate change[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2011, 34(2):96-112 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=fffdc94eadc91dfe9049c477ac8954b7 |
[4] | RAY D K, MUELLER N D, WEST P C, et al. Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(6):e66428 |
[5] | CHALISE K S, SINGH S, WEGNER B R, et al. Cover crops and returning residue impact on soil organic carbon, bulk density, penetration resistance, water retention, infiltration, and soybean yield[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2018, 111(1):99-108 |
[6] | NOVARA A, MINACAPILLI A, SANTORO A, et al. Real cover crops contribution to soil organic carbon sequestration in sloping vineyard[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 652:300-306 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.247 |
[7] | SALAZAR O, BALBOA L, PERALTA K, et al. Effect of cover crops on leaching of dissolved organic nitrogen and carbon in a maize-cover crop rotation in Mediterranean central Chile[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 212:399-406 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.031 |
[8] | PANTOJA J L, WOLI K P, SAWYER J E, et al. Corn nitrogen fertilization requirement and corn-soybean productivity with a rye cover crop[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2015, 79(5):1482-1495 doi: 10.2136/sssaj2015.02.0084 |
[9] | VERZEAUX J, ALAHMAD A, HABBIB H, et al. Cover crops prevent the deleterious effect of nitrogen fertilisation on bacterial diversity by maintaining the carbon content of ploughed soil[J]. Geoderma, 2016, 281:49-57 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=508253d2fbdd5a009d8b25dc31ae7760 |
[10] | COU?DEL A, ALLETTO L, TRIBOUILLOIS H, et al. Cover crop crucifer-legume mixtures provide effective nitrate catch crop and nitrogen green manure ecosystem services[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2018, 254:50-59 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ab0834e54080e528f4903d6f49d0e759 |
[11] | DANGA B O, OUMA J P, WAKINDIKI I I C, et al. Legume-wheat rotation effects on residual soil moisture, nitrogen and wheat yield in tropical regions[J]. Advances in Agronomy, 2009, 101:315-349 https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20093069244 |
[12] | 李婧, 张达斌, 王峥, 等.施肥和绿肥翻压方式对旱地冬小麦生长及土壤水分利用的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2012, 30(3):136-142 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7601.2012.03.024 LI J, ZHANG D B, WANG Z, et al. Effect of fertilizer and green manure incorporation methods on the growth and water use efficiency of winter wheat[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2012, 30(3):136-142 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7601.2012.03.024 |
[13] | 王峥, 梁颖, 姚鹏伟, 等.绿肥播前施肥和翻压方式对旱地麦田土壤水肥性状的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2014, 32(3):119-126 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ghdqnyyj201403020 WANG Z, LIANG Y, YAO P W, et al. Effects of fertilization before sowing of leguminous green manure and its incorporation methods on soil moisture and nutrient regime of wheat field in Weibei Dryland[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2014, 32(3):119-126 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ghdqnyyj201403020 |
[14] | 姚致远, 王峥, 李婧, 等.轮作及绿肥不同利用方式对作物产量和土壤肥力的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2015, 26(8):2329-2336 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb201508012 YAO Z Y, WANG Z, LI J, et al. Effects of rotations and different green manure utilizations on crop yield and soil fertility[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(8):2329-2336 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb201508012 |
[15] | 张久东, 包兴国, 曹卫东, 等.间作绿肥作物对玉米产量和土壤肥力的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2013, (4):43-47 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trfl201304010 ZHANG J D, BAO X G, CAO W D, et al. Effect of intercropping green manure crops on maize yield and soil fertility[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2013, (4):43-47 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trfl201304010 |
[16] | 赵娜, 赵护兵, 鱼昌为, 等.夏闲期种植翻压绿肥和施氮量对冬小麦生长的影响[J].西北农业学报, 2010, 19(12):41-47 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xbnyxb201012009 ZHAO N, ZHAO H B, YU C W, et al. Effect of green manure in summer fallow period and nitrogen rate on winter wheat growth[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2010, 19(12):41-47 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xbnyxb201012009 |
[17] | 殷文, 柴强, 胡发龙, 等.干旱内陆灌区不同秸秆还田方式下春小麦田土壤水分利用特征[J].中国农业科学, 2019, 52(7):1247-1259 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgnykx201907012 YIN W, CHAI Q, HU F L, et al. Characteristics of soil water utilization in spring wheat field with different straw retention approaches in dry inland irrigation areas[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(7):1247-1259 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgnykx201907012 |
[18] | 郭瑶, 柴强, 殷文, 等.绿洲灌区小麦免耕秸秆还田对后作玉米产量性能指标的影响[J].中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(1):69-77 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20170110&flag=1 GUO Y, CHAI Q, YIN W, et al. Effect of wheat straw return to soil with zero-tillage on maize yield in irrigated oases[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(1):69-77 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20170110&flag=1 |
[19] | 李向岭, 李从锋, 侯玉虹, 等.不同播期夏玉米产量性能动态指标及其生态效应[J].中国农业科学, 2012, 45(6):1074-1083 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgnykx201206005 LI X L, LI C F, HOU Y H, et al. Dynamic characteristics of summer maize yield performance in different planting dates and its effect of ecological factors[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(6):1074-1083 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgnykx201206005 |
[20] | 赵明, 李建国, 张宾, 等.论作物高产挖潜的补偿机制[J].作物学报, 2006, 32(10):1566-1573 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2006.10.023 ZHAO M, LI J G, ZHANG B, et al. The compensatory mechanism in exploring crop production potential[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2006, 32(10):1566-1573 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2006.10.023 |
[21] | 杨璐, 曹卫东, 白金顺, 等.翻压二月兰对玉米干物质积累和养分吸收及土壤养分的影响[J].华北农学报, 2014, 29(1):183-189 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hbnxb201401034 YANG L, CAO W D, BAI J S, et al. Effects of February orchid application on dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake in maize and soil nutrient status[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2014, 29(1):183-189 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hbnxb201401034 |
[22] | 郭耀东, 程曼, 赵秀峰, 等.轮作绿肥对盐碱地土壤性质、后作青贮玉米产量及品质的影响[J].中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(6):856-864 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2018-0608&flag=1 GUO Y D, CHENG M, ZHAO X F, et al. Effects of green manure rotation on soil properties and yield and quality of silage maize in saline-alkali soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018, 26(6):856-864 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2018-0608&flag=1 |
[23] | 赵彩衣, 王媛媛, 董青君, 等.不同水肥处理对苕子和后茬玉米生长及土壤肥力的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2019, 33(4):161-166 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqsystbcxb201904023 ZHAO C Y, WANG Y Y, DONG Q J, et al. Influence of different irrigation and fertilization treatments on the growth of Viciavillosa rothvar and later-cropping maize and soil fertility[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(4):161-166 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqsystbcxb201904023 |
[24] | KOUYATé Z, FRANZLUEBBERS K, JUO A S R, et al. Tillage, crop residue, legume rotation, and green manure effects on sorghum and millet yields in the semiarid tropics of Mali[J]. Plant and Soil, 2000, 225(1/2):141-151 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=4a629cecf45480511813dfa85dffc430 |
[25] | ASTIER M, MAASS J M, ETCHEVERS-BARRA J D, et al. Short-term green manure and tillage management effects on maize yield and soil quality in an Andisol[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2006, 88(1/2):153-159 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198705001467 |
[26] | 周岚, 姜英, 陈阜, 等.玉米-大豆轮作及氮肥水平对玉米农艺性状及产量的影响[J].中国农业大学学报, 2013, 18(6):61-67 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgnydxxb201306008 ZHOU L, JIANG Y, CHEN F, et al. Effect of soybean-maize rotation and fertilization on the agronomic trait and grain yield of maize[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2013, 18(6):61-67 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgnydxxb201306008 |
[27] | 刘小粉, 刘春增, 潘兹亮, 等.施用绿肥条件下减施化肥对土壤养分及持水供水能力的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2017, (3):75-79 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trfl201703014 LIU X F, LIU C Z, PAN C L, et al. Effect of reducing chemical fertilizer when the green manure applied on soil nutrients, water retention and supply capacities[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2017, (3):75-79 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trfl201703014 |
[28] | 李富翠, 赵护兵, 王朝辉, 等.旱地夏闲期秸秆覆盖和种植绿肥对冬小麦水分利用及养分吸收的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2012, 30(1):119-125 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7601.2012.01.021 LI F C, ZHAO H B, WANG C H, et al. Effects of straw mulching and planting green manure on water use and nutrients uptake of winter wheat on dryland[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2012, 30(1):119-125 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7601.2012.01.021 |
[29] | 周怀平, 解文艳, 关春林, 等.长期秸秆还田对旱地玉米产量、效益及水分利用的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(2):321-330 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zwyyyflxb201302007 ZHOU H P, XIE W Y, GUAN C L, et al. Effects of long-term straw-returning on corn yield, economic benefit and water use in arid farming areas[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2013, 19(2):321-330 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zwyyyflxb201302007 |
[30] | 王昕, 贾志宽, 韩清芳, 等.半干旱区秸秆覆盖量对土壤水分保蓄及作物水分利用效率的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2009, 27(4):196-202 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ghdqnyyj200904038 WANG X, JIA Z K, HAN Q F, et al. Effects of different straw mulching quantity on soil water and WUE in semiarid region[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2009, 27(4):196-202 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ghdqnyyj200904038 |
[31] | 王磊, 樊廷录, 王勇, 等.夏闲期栽培模式对土壤水分及冬小麦水分利用效率的影响[J].灌溉排水学报, 2015, 34(5):55-58 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ggps201505011 WANG L, FAN T L, WANG Y, et al. Effects of cultivation modes in summer fallow period on soil moisture and water use efficiency of winter wheat[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2015, 34(5):55-58 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ggps201505011 |
[32] | 张达斌, 姚鹏伟, 李婧, 等.豆科绿肥及施氮量对旱地麦田土壤主要肥力性状的影响[J].生态学报, 2013, 33(7):2272-2281 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201307028 ZHANG D B, YAO P W, LI J, et al. Effects of two years' incorporation of leguminous green manure on soil properties of a wheat field in dryland conditions[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(7):2272-2281 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201307028 |