张国伟,
刘瑞显,,
王晓婧,
倪万潮
江苏省农业科学院经济作物研究所/农业部长江下游棉花与油菜重点实验室 南京 210014
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目2017YFD0201900
农业部长江下游棉花与油菜重点实验室开放课题2017-CR01
详细信息
作者简介:杨长琴, 主要从事棉花栽培生理研究。E-mail:ychq2003@qq.com
通讯作者:刘瑞显, 主要从事作物生理生态学研究。E-mail:liuruixian2008@163.com
中图分类号:S562计量
文章访问数:664
HTML全文浏览量:13
PDF下载量:439
被引次数:0
出版历程
收稿日期:2019-07-16
录用日期:2019-09-18
刊出日期:2020-01-01
Effects of sowing dates on lint yield, fiber quality, and use of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in cotton field-seeded after barley or oilseed rape harvest in Yangtze River Valley, China
YANG Changqin,ZHANG Guowei,
LIU Ruixian,,
WANG Xiaojing,
NI Wanchao
Institute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rape in Yangtze River Downstream of Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210014, China
Funds: the National Key Research and Development Program of China2017YFD0201900
the Fund of Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rape in Yangtze River Downstream of Ministry of Agriculture2017-CR01
More Information
Corresponding author:LIU Ruixian: liuruixian2008@163.com
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要
摘要:为明确长江流域下游棉区麦(油)后直播棉生产的适宜播期,本研究以‘中棉所50’为材料,于2017-2018年进行大田试验,研究不同播期(5月15日、5月25日、6月4日、6月14日和6月24日)对直播棉产量、品质及养分利用的影响。结果表明,播期推迟,棉花生育进程推迟;花铃期日均温和日照时数降低、有效积温先升高后降低且以6月4日播期花铃期有效积温最高。可见,前3个播期棉花花铃期温光条件较好。棉株与生殖器官的生物量及氮磷钾累积量随播期推迟降低,且前3个播期的棉株生物量和养分累积进入较高速率累积期早于后2个播期的棉株。随着播期的推迟,直播棉成铃数与皮棉产量显著降低。与5月15日播期相比,其余4个播期直播棉的皮棉产量分别降低15.9%~16.9%、13.1%~16.9%、26.9%~33.5%、58.2~62.0%。100 kg皮棉氮、磷和钾吸收量随播期推迟而增加,但养分利用效率降低。不同播期间,以6月4日和6月14日播期棉纤维综合品质较优。综上,本试验条件下,5月15日-6月4日是长江流域棉区麦(油)后直播棉获得较高产量的适宜播期,该播期内适当推迟播种有利于棉花优质纤维的形成。
关键词:麦(油)后直播棉/
播期/
皮棉产量/
纤维品质/
养分利用
Abstract:This study aimed to evaluate the effects of sowing date on lint yield, quality, as well as nutrient uptake and use of cotton field-seeded after barley or oilseed rape harvest in the downstream Yangtze River Valley. Sowing dates were randomly assigned (15-May, 25-May, 4-June, 14-June, and 24-June), using short-season cotton (CCRI 50) in fields in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province of China, between 2017 and 2018. The results showed that:with delayed sowing date, the growing process slowed, the daily mean temperature and sunshine hours were lower during the flowering and bolling stages, and the effective accumulated temperature increased until it reached a peak on the sowing date of 4-June. These trends suggested that temperature and sunshine were both higher before the sowing date of 4-June. The biomass and nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium accumulation of cotton plants and reproductive organs decreased with sowing date delay. The accumulation rate in biomass and nutrient peaked even earlier, on the sowing date of 15-May, 25-May, and 4-June than on sowing date of 14-June and 24-June. As the sowing date was delayed, boll number and lint yield both decreased. Compared with the 15-May sowing date, the lint yields decreased by 13.1%-16.9% for sowing dates of 25-May and 4-June, and by 26.9%-33.5% and 58.2%-62.0% for sowing dates of 14-June and 24-June, respectively. Nutrient uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium for 100 kg lint yield increased with sowing date delay, while the nutrient use efficiency decreased. The fiber quality was better for sowing dates of 4-June and 14-June than for other sowing dates. In summary, sowing from 15-May to 4-June is suitable to achieve high yield in short-season cotton field-seeded after barley or oilseed rape harvest in the downstream Yangtze River Valley. Sowing later during this period would, on the other hand, lead to high fiber quality.
Key words:Field-seeded cotton after barley or oilseed rape harvest/
Sowing date/
Lint yield/
Fiber quality/
Nutrient utilization
HTML全文

图12017年和2018年不同播期麦(油)后的花铃期日均温、有效积温及日照时数
S1:播期为5月15日; S2:播期为5月25日; S3:播期为6月4日; S4:播期为6月14日; S5:播期为6月24日。S1: seeding date of 15th May; S2: seeding date of 25th May; S3: seeding date of 4th June; S4: seeding date of 14th June; S5: seeding date of 24th June.
Figure1.Mean daily temperature, effective accumulated temperature and sunshine hour during flowering and bolling stages of cotton field-seeded in different dates after barley or oilseed rape harvest in 2017 and 2018


图22018年播期对麦(油)后直播棉棉株生物量、生殖器官生物量和生物量经济系数的影响(2018)
S1:播期为5月15日; S2:播期为5月25日; S3:播期为6月4日; S4:播期为6月14日; S5:播期为6月24日。S1: seeding date of 15th May; S2: seeding date of 25th May; S3: seeding date of 4th June; S4: seeding date of 14th June; S5: seeding date of 24th June.
Figure2.Effects of sowing dates on biomass accumulation in shoot, reproductive organs, and economic coefficient of biomass of cotton field-seeded after barley or oilseed rape harvest in 2018


图32018年播期对麦(油)后直播棉棉株和生殖器官氮、磷、钾累积及其经济系数的影响
S1:播期为5月15日; S2:播期为5月25日; S3:播期为6月4日; S4:播期为6月14日; S5:播期为6月24日。S1: seeding date of 15th May; S2: seeding date of 25th May; S3: seeding date of 4th June; S4: seeding date of 14th June; S5: seeding date of 24th June.
Figure3.Effects of sowing dates on N, P and K accumulation in cotton plant, reproductive organs, and economic coefficient of N, P and K of cotton field-seeded after barley or oilseed rape harvest in 2018

表12017年和2018年播期对麦(油)后直播棉生育进程的影响
Table1.Effect of sowing dates on growth and development stages of cotton field-seeded after barley or oilseed rape harvest in 2017 and 2018
处理 Treatment | 播期(月-日) Sowing date (month-day) | 2017 | 2018 | |||||||
现蕾期(月-日) Budding date (month-day) | 开花期(月-日) Flowering date (month-day) | 吐絮期(月-日) Boll-opening date (month-day) | 播种—吐絮 Sowing to boll-opening (d) | 现蕾期(月-日) Budding date (month-day) | 开花期(月-日) Flowering date (month-day) | 吐絮期(月-日) Boll-opening date (month-day) | 播种—吐絮 Sowing to boll-opening (d) | |||
S1 | 05-15 | 06-13 | 07-10 | 08-21 | 98 | 06-13 | 07-08 | 08-22 | 99 | |
S2 | 05-25 | 06-22 | 07-16 | 09-02 | 100 | 06-22 | 07-16 | 09-03 | 101 | |
S3 | 06-04 | 07-03 | 07-24 | 09-19 | 107 | 06-30 | 07-23 | 09-16 | 104 | |
S4 | 06-14 | 07-10 | 08-01 | 09-27 | 105 | 07-09 | 08-02 | 09-26 | 104 | |
S5 | 06-24 | 07-20 | 08-13 | 10-11 | 109 | 07-20 | 08-15 | 10-09 | 107 |

表22017年和2018年播期对麦(油)后直播棉产量及其构成的影响
Table2.Effect of sowing dates on yield and yield components of cotton field-seeded after barley or oilseed rape harvest in 2017 and 2018
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 成铃数 Boll number (104·hm-2) | 铃重 Boll mass (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 皮棉产量 Lint yield (kg·hm-2) | 霜前花率 Ratio of pre-frost yield (%) | 霜前皮棉产量 Lint yield before frost (kg·hm-2) |
2017 | S1 | 114.1±1.5a | 3.87±0.07c | 39.1±0.5a | 1 725.2±6.3a | 90.3±1.8a | 1 557.2±27.6a |
S2 | 96.5±2.2b | 4.04±0.12bc | 37.2±0.6bc | 1 449.9±11.1b | 84.1±1.2b | 1 219.4±26.1b | |
S3 | 96.2±2.1b | 4.08±0.09b | 38.2±0.7ab | 1 498.6±45.9b | 78.3±1.2c | 1 173.4±27.3b | |
S4 | 78.0±1.0c | 4.04±0.03bc | 36.4±0.4cd | 1 146.5±30.7c | 57.5±1.2d | 659.8±29.8c | |
S5 | 42.0±2.3d | 4.38±0.13a | 35.7±0.8d | 656.2±54.2d | 49.0±1.4e | 321.1±27.1d | |
2018 | S1 | 110.3±1.4a | 4.55±0.13d | 37.1±0.2a | 1 861.9±68.2a | 92.1±1.6a | 1 714.7±40.6a |
S2 | 96.5±1.0 b | 4.52±0.12d | 35.4±0.2c | 1 547.8±42.4b | 87.3±1.73b | 1 351.2±24.8b | |
S3 | 88.8±2.4c | 4.83±0.07c | 36.1±0.2b | 1 547.0±13.3b | 81.8±2.6c | 1 265.4±36.4b | |
S4 | 77.7±1.4d | 5.15±0.11b | 34.1±0.2d | 1 361.1±37.9c | 61.9±2.6d | 842.5±6.1c | |
S5 | 43.0±0.9e | 5.35±0.08a | 33.8±0.3d | 778.2±18.7d | 52.8±1.9e | 410.8±12.6d | |
S1:播期为5月15日; S2:播期为5月25日; S3:播期为6月4日; S4:播期为6月14日; S5:播期为6月24日。数据为3次重复的平均值±标准误, 数值后不同字母表示在0.05水平上差异显著。S1: seeding date of 15th May; S2: seeding date of 25th May; S3: seeding date of 4th June; S4: seeding date of 14th June; S5: seeding date of 24th June. Values are means ± S.E. (n = 3). Different letters in the same column are significantly different at P < 0.05. |

表32017年和2018年播期对麦(油)后直播棉霜前纤维品质的影响
Table3.Effect of sowing dates on fiber quality of cotton field-seeded after barley or oilseed rape harvest in 2017 and 2018
处理 Treatment | 2017 | 2018 | |||||||
长度 Fiber length (mm) | 整齐度指数 Uniformity index (%) | 比强度 Breaking strength (cN×tex-1) | 马克隆值 Micronaire | 长度 Fiber length (mm) | 整齐度指数 Uniformity index (%) | 比强度 Breaking strength (cN×tex-1) | 马克隆值 Micronaire | ||
S1 | 27.7±0.4c | 81.7±2.3b | 27.7±0.0c | 5.6±0.0a | 28.1±0.1b | 81.9±0.1a | 27.5±0.1b | 5.1±0.0a | |
S2 | 28.1±0.1c | 83.6±0.1a | 29.9±0.1a | 5.4±0.1a | 28.3±0.1b | 81.6±0.1a | 28.6±0.1a | 4.8±0.1b | |
S3 | 30.0±0.4a | 83.4±0.4a | 30.0±1.3a | 5.4±1.3a | 29.4±0.1a | 81.6±0.1a | 28.7±0.1a | 4.8±0.1b | |
S4 | 30.5±0.0a | 83.4±0.4a | 29.9±1.1a | 5.4±1.1a | 29.5±0.2a | 82.1±0.2a | 28.5±0.1a | 4.6±0.1b | |
S5 | 29.1±0.9b | 84.2±0.6a | 28.9±0.3b | 5.4±0.3a | 29.0±0.1a | 82.2±0.3a | 28.0±0.2ab | 4.8±0.1b | |
S1:播期为5月15日; S2:播期为5月25日; S3:播期为6月4日; S4:播期为6月14日; S5:播期为6月24日。数据为3次重复的平均值±标准误, 数值后不同字母表示在0.05水平上差异显著。S1: seeding date of 15th May; S2: seeding date of 25th May; S3: seeding date of 4th June; S4: seeding date of 14th June; S5: seeding date of 24th June. Values are means ± S.E. (n = 3). Different letters in the same column are significantly different at P < 0.05. |

表42017年和2018年播期对麦(油)后直播棉氮磷钾吸收与养分利用效率的影响
Table4.Uptake and lint production efficiency of N, P and K of cotton field-seeded after barley or oilseed rape harvest in 2017 and 2018
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 100 kg皮棉养分吸收量 Nutrient uptake per 100 kg lint (kg) | 养分利用效率 Nutrient utilization efficiency (kg·kg-1) | |||||
N | P | K | N | P | K | |||
2017 | S1 | 11.3±0.1d | 3.8±0.0d | 11.8±0.0d | 8.9±0.1a | 26.0±0.3a | 8.5±0.0a | |
S2 | 12.3±0.1c | 4.4±0.0bc | 13.2±0.2c | 8.1±0.1b | 22.5±0.0bc | 7.6±0.1b | ||
S3 | 12.5±0.2c | 4.3±0.1c | 13.4±0.4c | 8.0±0.1b | 23.2±0.5b | 7.5±0.2b | ||
S4 | 13.6±0.2b | 4.5±0.0b | 14.9±0.1b | 7.4±0.1c | 22.1±0.0c | 6.7±0.3c | ||
S5 | 19.7±0.1a | 6.2±0.0a | 19.8±0.6a | 5.1±0.0d | 16.1±0.2d | 5.1±0.2d | ||
2018 | S1 | 11.0±0.4d | 3.8±0.1d | 12.8±0.1c | 9.1±0.4a | 26.6±0.7a | 7.8±0.1a | |
S2 | 12.1±0.6c | 4.4±0.1bc | 13.4±0.1c | 8.3±0.4b | 22.8±0.4c | 7.5±0.1b | ||
S3 | 12.0±0.3c | 4.2±0.1c | 13.1±0.1c | 8.3±0.2b | 23.7±0.3b | 7.6±0.0ab | ||
S4 | 13.1±0.2b | 4.5±0.1b | 14.9±0.3b | 7.6±0.1c | 22.0±0.2d | 6.7±0.2c | ||
S5 | 19.4±0.4a | 6.4±0.1a | 19.3±0.4a | 5.1±0.1d | 15.7±0.3e | 5.2±0.1d | ||
S1:播期为5月15日; S2:播期为5月25日; S3:播期为6月4日; S4:播期为6月14日; S5:播期为6月24日。数据为3次重复的平均值±标准误, 数值后不同字母表示在0.05水平上差异显著。S1: seeding date of 15th May; S2: seeding date of 25th May; S3: seeding date of 4th June; S4: seeding date of 14th June; S5: seeding date of 24th June. Values are means ± S.E. (n = 3). Different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05. |

参考文献
[1] | 杨长琴, 张国伟, 刘瑞显, 等.不同播期与打顶时间对麦(油)后直播短季棉产量及纤维品质的影响[J].棉花学报, 2017, 29(6):525-532 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mhxb201706004 YANG C Q, ZHANG G W, LIU R X, et al. Effects of seeding date and topping date on yield and fiber quality of short-season cotton field-seeded after barley(rape)/wheat harvest[J]. Cotton Science, 2017, 29(6):525-532 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mhxb201706004 |
[2] | 杨长琴, 张国伟, 刘瑞显, 等.氮肥运筹对麦后直播棉产量与氮素利用的影响[J].中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(12):1607-1613 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stnyyj201612003 YANG C Q, ZHANG G W, LIU R X, et al. Effect of nitrogen management on lint yield and nitrogen utilization of field-seeded cotton after barley harvest[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(12):1607-1613 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stnyyj201612003 |
[3] | 李宁, 翟志席, 李建民, 等.播期与密度组合对夏玉米群体源库关系及冠层透光率的影响[J].中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(5):959-964 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stnyyj201005009 LI N, ZHAI Z X, LI J M, et al. Effect of sowing date and density on sink/source relationship and canopy light transmission of summer maize (Zea mays L.)[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2010, 18(5):959-964 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stnyyj201005009 |
[4] | DAVIDONIS G H, JOHNSON A S, LANDIVAR J A, et al. Cotton fiber quality is related to boll location and planting date[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2004, 96(1):42 doi: 10.2134/agronj2004.0042 |
[5] | PETTIGREW W T. Improved yield potential with an early planting cotton production system[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2002, 94:997-1003 doi: 10.2134/agronj2002.0997 |
[6] | DONG H Z, LI W J, TANG W, et al. Yield, quality and leaf senescence of cotton grown at varying planting dates and plant densities in the Yellow River Valley of China[J]. Field Crops Research, 2006, 98(2/3):106-115 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=927b2c9c2cf076db04e6c4fac0c55078 |
[7] | NUTI R C, VIATOR R P, CASTEEL S N, et al. Effect of planting date, mepiquat chloride, and glyphosate application to glyphosate-resistant cotton[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2006, 98(6):1627 doi: 10.2134/agronj2005.0360 |
[8] | BOQUET D J, CLAWSON E L. Cotton planting date:yield, seedling survival, and plant growth[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2009, 101(5):1123 doi: 10.2134/agronj2009.0071 |
[9] | DEOL J S, KAUR R, BRAR Z S. Growth and yield of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as affected by sowing dates and plant spacings[J]. Enviroment Ecology, 2011, 29:1886-1888 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=f0c928fa81e36fdd8ee7550b4bb44a7b |
[10] | BANGE M P, CATON S J, MILROY S P. Managing yields of high fruit retention in transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) using sowing date[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2008, 59(8):733 doi: 10.1071/AR07423 |
[11] | PORTER P M, SULLIVAN M J, HARVEY L H. Cotton cultivar response to planting date on the southeastern coastal plain[J]. Journal of Production Agriculture, 1996, 9(2):223 doi: 10.2134/jpa1996.0223 |
[12] | 卢合全, 李振怀, 董合忠, 等.播种期对2个不同类型棉花品种产量和产量构成的影响[J].棉花学报, 2012, 24(4):312-317 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2012.04.004 LU H Q, LI Z H, DONG H Z, et al. Effect of planting date on yield and yield components of two different cotton genotypes[J]. Cotton Science, 2012, 24(4):312-317 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2012.04.004 |
[13] | 张国伟, 张祥, 陈德华, 等.播期对内蒙古西部荒漠区棉花产量、品质及养分吸收利用的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2017, 28(3):863-870 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb201703018 ZHANG G W, ZHANG X, CHEN D H, et al. Effect of sowing dates on cotton yield, fiber quality, and uptake and utilization of nutrients in Inner Mongolia West desert area, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(3):863-870 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb201703018 |
[14] | 张国伟, 杨长琴, 倪万潮, 等.施氮量对麦后直播棉氮素吸收利用的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2016, 27(1):157-164 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb201601020 ZHANG G W, YANG C Q, NI W C, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rates on nitrogen uptake and utilization of direct-seeded cotton after wheat harvest[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(1):157-164 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb201601020 |
[15] | 张立祯, 曹卫星, 张思平, 等.基于生理发育时间的棉花生育期模拟模型[J].棉花学报, 2003, 15(2):97-103 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2003.02.007 ZHANG L Z, CAO W X, ZHANG S P et al. Simulation model for cotton development stages based on physiological development time[J]. Cotton Science, 2003, 15(2):97-103 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2003.02.007 |
[16] | 李合生.植物生理生化实验原理与技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2010 LI H S. Experiment Principle and Technique on Plant Physiology and Biochemistry[M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2010 |
[17] | ZHENG Y H, WANG Z L, SUN X Z, et al. Higher salinity tolerance cultivars of winter wheat relieved senescence at reproductive stage[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2008, 62(2):129-138 doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.07.011 |
[18] | 张凡, 睢宁, 余超然, 等.小麦秸秆还田和施钾对棉花产量与养分吸收的效应[J].作物学报, 2014, 40(12):2169-2175 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zuowxb201412016 ZHANG F, SUI N, YU C R, et al. Effects of wheat straw returning and potassium fertilizer application on yield and nutrients uptake of cotton[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(12):2169-2175 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zuowxb201412016 |
[19] | 王保民, 何钟佩, 徐原嘉, 等.影响棉花产量因素的灰色关联分析[J].棉花学报, 1997, 9(3):163-167 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199700379311 WANG B M, HE Z P, XU Y J, et al. Relational grade analysis of grey system for agronomic traits and climatic factors to the total lint yield of cotton (G.hirsutum L.)[J]. Cotton Science, 1997, 9(3):163-167 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199700379311 |
[20] | 杨长琴, 刘敬然, 张国伟, 等.花铃期干旱和渍水对棉铃碳水化合物含量的影响及其与棉铃生物量累积的关系[J].应用生态学报, 2014, 25(8):2251-2258 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb201408014 YANG C Q, LIU J R, ZHANG G W, et al. Effects of drought and waterlogging on carbohydrate contents of cotton boll and its relationship with boll biomass accumulation at the flowering and bolling stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(8):2251-2258 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb201408014 |
[21] | 赵新华, 束红梅, 王友华, 等.播期对棉铃生物量和氮累积与分配的影响及其与棉铃品质的关系[J].作物学报, 2010, 36(10):1707-1714 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zuowxb201010012 ZHAO X H, SHU H M, WANG Y H, et al. Effects of sowing date on accumulation and distribution of biomass and nitrogen in cotton bolls[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(10):1707-1714 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zuowxb201010012 |
[22] | 张新新, 陈吉, 刘敬然, 等.温光互作对棉花不同空间部位纤维品质的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2015, 48(5):861-871 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgnykx201505004 ZHANG X X, CHEN J, LIU J R, et al. Effects of temperature-light factor on cotton fiber qualities at different spatial fruiting branch positions[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(5):861-871 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgnykx201505004 |
[23] | 陈冠文, 余渝.棉铃发育温光效应的初步研究[J].棉花学报, 2001, 13(1):63-64 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2001.01.015 CHEN G W, YU Y. Preliminary study on the temperature-light effects on boll development[J]. Cotton Science, 2001, 13(1):63-64 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2001.01.015 |
[24] | 刘国栋, 徐清来, 周娟, 等.播期对棉花品种产量、品质及其构成因素的影响[J].山东农业科学, 2017, 49(1):65-68 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/shandnykx201701012 LIU G D, XU Q L, ZHOU J, et al. Effects of different sowing dates on cotton yield, fiber quality and their components[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 49(1):65-68 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/shandnykx201701012 |
[25] | 高云光, 彭小峰, 饶翠婷, 等.播种时期对棉铃生长发育的调节效应研究[J].新疆农业科学, 2010, 47(4):668-672 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xjnykx201004007 GAO Y G, PENG X F, RAO C T, et al. Regulation effect of growth and development of cotton boll in different sowing season[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 47(4):668-672 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xjnykx201004007 |
[26] | 董合忠, 李维江, 唐薇, 等.棉花不同熟性品种栽培技术新途径的探讨[J].棉花学报, 2000, 12(3):132-135 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2000.03.005 DONG H Z, LI W J, TANG W, et al. Investigation on new cultivation technique on different maturity cotton varieties[J]. Acta Gossypii Sinica, 2000, 12(3):132-135 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2000.03.005 |
[27] | 杨长琴, 周治国, 陈德华, 等.长江流域棉区麦(油)棉两熟种植的棉花增密减肥轻简高效技术[J].中国棉花, 2018, 45(10):1-4 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgmh201810002 YANG C Q, ZHOU Z G, CHEN D H, et al. Light-simplified and high efficient cultivation technologies of cotton with increased planting density and reduced fertilizer application for wheat/rape-cotton cropping system in the Yangtze valley[J]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(10):1-4 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgmh201810002 |
[28] | 刘瑞显, 周治国, 陈德华, 等.长江流域棉区棉花"三集中"的轻简高效理论与栽培途径[J].中国棉花, 2018, 45(9):11-12 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgmh201809004 LIU R X, ZHOU Z G, CHEN D H, et al. Theory of "Sanjizhong" and technology on simple and efficient cotton cultivation in the Yangtze River valley[J]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(9):11-12 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgmh201809004 |
[29] | WRATHER J A, PHIPPS B, STEVENS W E, et al. Cotton planting date and plant population effects on yield and fiber quality in the Mississippi Delta[J]. Journal of Cotton Science, 2008, 12(1):1-7 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=Open J-Gate000000604219 |