魏守军1,
韦京艳1,
孟俊婷1,
郭瑞林2,
冯晓建3
1.中国农业科学院棉花研究所/棉花生物学国家重点实验室 安阳 455000
2.安阳工学院 安阳 455000
3.常州纤维检验所 常州 213000
基金项目: 国家棉花产业技术体系项目CARS-15-25
中国农业科学院科技创新工程项目CAAS-ASTIP-2019-CCRI
详细信息
作者简介:唐淑荣, 研究方向为棉花纤维加工和检验与质量安全。E-mail:tangshurong2008@126.com
中图分类号:S56计量
文章访问数:3229
HTML全文浏览量:10
PDF下载量:2691
被引次数:0
出版历程
收稿日期:2018-11-22
录用日期:2018-12-28
刊出日期:2019-06-01
Classification evaluation and fiber quality characteristics of different types of cotton varieties using similarity-difference analysis method
TANG Shurong1,,WEI Shoujun1,
WEI Jingyan1,
MENG Junting1,
GUO Ruilin2,
FENG Xiaojian3
1. Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences/State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Anyang 455000, China
2. Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang 455000, China
3. Changzhou Institute of Fiber Inspection, Changzhou 213000, China
Funds: the National Cotton Industry Technology System Project of ChinaCARS-15-25
the Science and Technology Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesCAAS-ASTIP-2019-CCRI
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要
摘要:为精确分析中国棉花纤维品质的区域特征、分布规律及综合性评价，以2005-2014年国家棉花品种区域试验531个参试品种纤维品质数据为材料，运用作物育种同异性分析理论对杂交棉和常规棉品种的纤维品质进行综合评价。结果表明：1）常规棉品种纤维品质符合审定标准Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型的品种数分别占参试常规棉品种数的1.58%、28.42%和14.74%，杂交棉纤维品质符合审定标准Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型的品种分别占参试杂交棉品种数的0.59%、19.94%和10.56%。黄河流域常规棉品种、杂交棉品种纤维品质综合同一度分别为0.869 3和0.888 8，长江流域杂交棉纤维品质综合同一度为0.864 3，西北内陆棉区常规棉纤维品质综合同一度为0.890 5。2）不同棉区常规棉与杂交棉纤维品质性状比较表明，西北内陆棉区常规棉品种纤维品质性状优于黄河流域杂交棉；而黄河流域杂交棉又优于黄河流域常规棉和长江流域杂交棉，黄河流域常规棉与长江流域杂交棉纤维品质性状差异不显著。可见，黄河流域棉区适宜种植推广中长绒、高比强和高马克隆值的常规棉品种；长江流域棉区适宜种植中长绒、高比强度和高马克隆值的杂交棉品种；西北内陆棉区适合种植长强细的优质常规棉品种，可作为棉纺工业纺中高支纱的优质棉生产基地。本研究对优化我国优质棉区域布局和种植结构调整有重要参考价值。
关键词:棉花(Gossypium hirsutum L.)/
纤维品质/
杂交棉/
常规棉/
综合评价/
区域特征
Abstract:For an accurate analysis of the regional distribution characteristics, the fiber quality traits of 531 candidate varieties in national cotton regional trials in China between 2005 and 2014 were analyzed to achieve comprehensive evaluation of hybrid and conventional cotton varieties by using similarity-difference analyses method in crop-breeding fields. The results showed that:1) conventional cotton varieties with fiber quality qualified as type Ⅰ, type Ⅱ, and type Ⅲ accounted for the total conventional varieties of 1.58%, 28.42%, and 14.74%, whereas the proportions of type Ⅰ, type Ⅱ, and type Ⅲ for hybrid cotton were 0.59%, 19.94%, and 10.56%, respectively. The identical degree of the conventional and hybrid cotton cultivars in the Yellow River Valley (YeRV) was estimated to be 0.869 3 and 0.888 8, the identical degree of hybrid cotton in the Yangtze River Valley (YaRV) was 0.864 3, and that of cotton varieties in the Northwest Inland (NWI) was 0.890 5. 2) The fiber quality of conventional cotton in the NWI was better than that of hybrid cotton in the YeRV, and the fiber quality of the latter was better than that of conventional cultivars in the YeRV and hybrid cotton in the YaRV. There were no significant differences in conventional cultivars in the YeRV and hybrid cotton in the YaRV. The YaRV is suitable cotton planting area for medium-long length and high-strength of fiber, and high-micronaire hybrid cotton varieties. The NWI is suitable for planting high-quality conventional cotton varieties with long and fine quality as cotton spinning high yarn industry base. In brief, the fiber quality traits of conventional cotton in the NWI were proven to have the most potential, which can be an important reference value to optimize high-quality cotton regional layout and to adjust the planting structure in China.
Key words:Cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.)/
Fiber quality/
Hybrid cotton/
Conventional cotton/
Comprehensive evaluation/
Regional characteristics
HTML全文
表1同异关系下的品种联系势与联系势测验标准
Table1.Variety contact appearance and its test standard under with similarity-difference analysis
| 品种势级 Variety level | 品种联系势 Variety contact appearance | 联系势值[S(H)] Contact appearance value | a、b及其关系 a, b and their relation |
| 同势?Similar | 准同势?Half similar | S(H)≥9 999 | a=1或?or b=0 |
| 强同势?Strong similar | 4.235 6≤S(H) < 9 999 | a > b, 0.809≤a < 1 | |
| 弱同势?Weak similar | 2.236 2≤S(H) < 4.235 6 | a > b, 0.691≤a < 0.809 | |
| 微同势?Tiny similar | 1 < S(H) < 2.236 2 | a > b, 0.5 < a < 0.691 | |
| 均势?Equilibrium | 均势?Equilibrium | S(H)=1 | a=b=0.5 |
| 异势?Different | 微异势?Tiny different | 0.447 2≤S(H) < 1 | a < b, 0.309≤a < 0.5 |
| 弱异势?Weak different | 0.236 1≤S(H) < 0.447 2 | a < b, 0.191≤a < 0.309 | |
| 强异势?Strong different | 0 < S(H) < 0.236 1 | a < b, 0 < a < 0.191 | |
| 准异势?Half different | S(H)=0 | a=0或?or b=1 |
下载: 导出CSV表22005-2014年国家棉花区域试验纤维品质达到国家标准Ⅰ和Ⅱ型的品种
Table2.Cultivars in national regional trials with fiber quality up to the national standards of type Ⅰ and Ⅱ from 2005 to 2014
| 生态区 Ecological region | 品种类型 Variety type | Ⅰ型品种 Type 1 variety | Ⅱ型品种 Type 2 variety |
| 黄河流域棉区 Yellow River Valley | 常规棉 Conventional variety | 中农8503 Zhongnong 8503 | 鲁2015、126系9、GK50、银抗9号、银瑞361、sGK958、……、银兴棉4号、锦科棉11号(共27个) Lu 2015, 126xi 9, GK 50, Yinkang 9, Yinrui 361, sGK 958, $ \cdots $, Yinxingmian 4, Jinkemian 11 (a total of 27) |
| 杂交棉 Hybrid variety | 郑育棉2号 Zhengyumian 2 | 鑫秋2号、H325、鲁 H619、鲁 H33、MB4608、……、棉乡杂3号、欣杂15、鲁 HB、标杂-5 (共34个) Xinqiu 2, H325, LuH 619, LuH 33, MB 4608, $ \cdots $, Mianxiangza 3, Xinza 15, LuHB, Biaoza-5 (a total of 34) | |
| 长江流域棉区 Yangtze River Valley | 杂交棉 Hybrid variety | 银宇1号 Yinyu 1 | 慈杂1号、诺华棉1号、H318、苏研502、……、中1104、楚棉608、川杂棉30 (共34个) Ciza 1, Nuohuamian 1, H318, Suyan 502, $ \cdots $, Zhong 1104, Chumian 608, Chuanzamian 30 (a total of 34) |
| 西北内陆棉区 Northwest Inland Region | 常规棉 Conventional variety | DJ3061, 6802 | WS-05、H038、农信一号、RM644、THA-27、X5216、S02-21、KC127、9858、……、创棉501、K516、华萃棉9号、巴19556 (共27个) WS-05, H038, Nongxin 1, RM 644, THA-27, X5216, S02-21, KC 127, 9858, $ \cdots $, Chuangmian 501, K516, Huacuimian 9, Ba 19556 (a total of 27) |
下载: 导出CSV表32005-2014年黄河流域常规棉纤维品质性状的同异分析
Table3.Similarity-difference analysis of fiber quality characters of conventional cotton in the Yellow River Valley from 2005 to 2014
| 品种 Cultivar | 综合同一度 Comprehensive homogenity | 同异联系式 Difference contact style | 同异联系势值 Difference contact style value | 联系势 Contact style | 联系势测验 Contact style trial | 位次 Order |
| 中农8503?Zhongnong 8503 | 0.983 7 | 0.983 7+0.016 3i | 60.35 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 1 |
| 国欣棉9号?Guoxinmian 9 | 0.946 8 | 0.946 8+0.0532i | 17.80 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 2 |
| $ \cdots $ | $ \cdots $ | $ \cdots $ | $ \cdots $ | $ \cdots $ | $ \cdots $ | $ \cdots $ |
| 科林9828?Kelin 9828 | 0.818 0 | 0.818 0+0.182 0i | 4.49 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 116 |
| sGK3 | 0.814 2 | 0.814 2+0.185 8i | 4.38 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 117 |
| 鲁创棉117?Luchuangmian 117 | 0.811 2 | 0.811 2+0.188 8i | 4.30 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 118 |
| 山农棉14号?Shannongmian 14 | 0.810 2 | 0.810 2+0.189 8i | 4.27 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 119 |
| 沃棉2号?Womian 2 | 0.807 6 | 0.807 6+0.192 4i | 4.20 | 弱同势?Weak similar | b | 120 |
| sGK中51504?sGKzhong 51504 | 0.802 7 | 0.802 7+0.197 3i | 4.07 | 弱同势?Weak similar | b | 121 |
| 冀棉315?Jimian 315 | 0.801 3 | 0.801 3+0.198 7i | 4.03 | 弱同势?Weak similar | b | 122 |
| 平均?Average | 0.869 3 | 0.869 3+0.130 7i | 7.60 | |||
| a表示品种间综合性状无显著差异; b表示品种间综合性状达显著差异。i是一个不确定系数, 由于环境、气候、施肥、浇水、管理等不确定因素的影响, 试验会受到试验误差的干扰, 不确定系数i在1与-1之间不确定取值, 代表一种影响因素。“a” indicates no significant difference in the combination of traits among cultivars; “b” indicates significant differences in interspecies traits. “i” is an uncertainty factor. Due to uncertainties such as the environment, climate, fertilization, watering, and management, the test will be disturbed by experimental errors. The uncertainty factor “i” is uncertain between 1 and -1, representing an influential factor. | ||||||
下载: 导出CSV表42005-2014年黄河流域杂交棉主要品质性状的同异分析
Table4.Similarity-difference analysis on main quality characters of hybrid cotton in the Yellow River Valley from 2005 to 2014
| 品种 Cultivar | 综合同一度 Comprehensive homogenity | 同异联系式 Difference contact style | 同异联系势值 Difference contact style value | 联系势 Contact style | 联系势测验 Contact style trial | 位次 Order |
| MB4608 | 0.992 1 | 0.992 1+0.007 9i | 125.58 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 1 |
| 郑育棉2号?Zhengyumian 2 | 0.987 4 | 0.987 4+0.012 6i | 78.37 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 2 |
| SCH18 | 0.972 7 | 0.972 7+0.027 3i | 35.63 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 3 |
| $ \cdots $ | $ \cdots $ | $ \cdots $ | $ \cdots $ | $ \cdots $ | $ \cdots $ | $ \cdots $ |
| 欣抗棉963?Xinkangmian 963 | 0.828 4 | 0.828 4+0.171 6i | 4.83 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 120 |
| 冀1518?Ji 1518 | 0.826 8 | 0.826 8+0.173 2i | 4.77 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 121 |
| 中植棉1020?Zhongzhimian 1020 | 0.819 1 | 0.819 1+0.180 9i | 4.53 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 122 |
| 平均?Average | 0.888 0 | 0.888 0+0.112 0i | 10.12 | |||
| a表示品种间综合性状无显著差异; b表示品种间综合性状达显著差异。i是一个不确定系数, 由于环境、气候、施肥、浇水、管理等不确定因素的影响, 试验会受到试验误差的干扰, 不确定系数 i在1与-1之间不确定取值, 代表一种影响因素。“a” indicates no significant difference in the combination of traits among cultivars; “b” indicates significant differences in interspecies traits. “i” is an uncertainty factor. Due to uncertainties such as the environment, climate, fertilization, watering, and management, the test will be disturbed by experimental errors. The uncertainty factor “i” is uncertain between 1 and -1, representing an influential factor. | ||||||
下载: 导出CSV表5不同生态区常规棉与杂交棉纤维品质性状的综合比较
Table5.Comprehensive comparison of fiber quality characters of conventional cultivars and hybrid cotton in different ecological areas
| 生态区 Ecological area | 参数 Parameter | 长度 Length (mm) | 比强度 Strength (cN·tex-1) | 马克隆值 Micronaire | 纺纱均匀性指数 Spinning consistency index | Ⅰ* | Ⅱ* | Ⅲ* | 综合同一度 Comprehensive homogenity |
| 黄河流域常规棉 Conventional cotton in Yellow River valley | 最大值?Maximum | 31.8 | 35.2 | 5.9 | 165 | 1 (0.82%) | 27 (22.1%) | 26 (21.3%) | 0.869 3 |
| 最小值?Minimum | 28.0 | 27.6 | 4.2 | 118 | |||||
| 平均值?Average | 29.4 | 29.9 | 5.0 | 141 | |||||
| 黄河流域杂交棉 Hybrid cotton in Yellow River valley | 最大值?Maximum | 32.6 | 33.5 | 5.8 | 166 | 1 (0.82%) | 34 (27.8%) | 10 (8.2%) | 0.888 0 |
| 最小值?Minimum | 27.6 | 26.6 | 4.2 | 122 | |||||
| 平均值?Average | 29.9 | 30.1 | 4.9 | 144 | |||||
| 长江流域杂交棉 Hybrid cotton in Yangtze River valley | 最大值?Maximum | 33.8 | 33.6 | 5.8 | 171 | 1 (0.46%) | 34 (15.5%) | 26 (11.8%) | 0.864 3 |
| 最小值?Minimum | 27.3 | 26.0 | 4.2 | 115 | |||||
| 平均值?Average | 29.9 | 30.0 | 5.1 | 143 | |||||
| 西北内陆常规棉 Conventional cotton in Northwest Inland | 最大值?Maximum | 33.3 | 34.8 | 5.0 | 178 | 2 (2.9%) | 27 (39.7%) | 2 (2.9%) | 0.890 5 |
| 最小值?Minimum | 28.1 | 26.2 | 3.5 | 124 | |||||
| 平均值?Average | 29.9 | 29.8 | 4.5 | 149 | |||||
| *:栏内Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型括号外数字表示该类型品种个数, 括号内数字表示该类型品种占该组总参试品种的百分率。*: Data outside brackets in the column of Type Ⅰ, typeⅡand typeⅢare the number of cultivars, data within brackets are the percentage of the total cultivars. | |||||||||
下载: 导出CSV表62005-2014年长江流域杂交棉纤维品质性状的同异性分析
Table6.Similarity-difference analysis on fiber quality characters of hybrid cultivars in the Yangtze River Valley from 2005 to 2014
| 品种 Cultivar | 综合同一度 Comprehensive homogenity | 同异联系式 Difference contact style | 同异联系势值 Difference contact style value | 联系势 Contact style | 联系势测验 Contact style trial | 位次 Order |
| 银宇1号?Yinyu 1 | 0.999 8 | 0.999 8+0.000 2i | 4 999.66 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 1 |
| 齐棉8号?Qimian 8 | 0.946 2 | 0.946 2+0.053 8i | 17.59 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 2 |
| 中1104?Zhong 1104 | 0.934 6 | 0.934 6+0.065 4i | 14.29 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 3 |
| B78 | 0.921 2 | 0.921 2+0.078 8i | 11.69 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 4 |
| SH05 | 0.919 0 | 0.919 0+0.081 0i | 11.35 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 5 |
| $ \cdots $ | $ \cdots $ | $ \cdots $ | $ \cdots $ | $ \cdots $ | $ \cdots $ | $ \cdots $ |
| 楚杂408?Chuza 408 | 0.813 0 | 0.813 0+0.187 0i | 4.35 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 212 |
| 南抗7号?Nankang 7 | 0.811 8 | 0.811 8+0.188 2i | 4.31 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 213 |
| 兴亚棉2号?Xingyamian 2 | 0.809 9 | 0.809 9+0.190 1i | 4.26 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 214 |
| B8130R | 0.807 3 | 0.807 3+0.192 7i | 4.19 | 弱同势?Weak similar | b | 215 |
| 富杂棉3号?Fuzamian 3 | 0.806 0 | 0.806 0+0.194 0i | 4.15 | 弱同势?Weak similar | b | 216 |
| 升金棉20号?Shengjinmian 20 | 0.800 8 | 0.800 8+0.199 2i | 4.02 | 弱同势?Weak similar | b | 217 |
| 中杂04-1?Zhongza 04-1 | 0.797 1 | 0.797 1+0.202 9i | 3.93 | 弱同势?Weak similar | b | 218 |
| JC559 | 0.779 4 | 0.779 4+0.220 6i | 3.53 | 弱同势?Weak similar | b | 219 |
| 平均?Average | 0.864 3 | 0.864 3+0.135 7i | 29.42 | |||
| a表示品种间综合性状无显著差异; b表示品种间综合性状达显著差异。i是一个不确定系数, 由于环境、气候、施肥、浇水、管理等不确定因素的影响, 试验会受到试验误差的干扰, 不确定系数 i在1与-1之间不确定取值, 代表一种影响因素。“a” indicates no significant difference in the combination of traits among cultivars; “b” indicates significant differences in interspecies traits. “i” is an uncertainty factor. Due to uncertainties such as the environment, climate, fertilization, watering, and management, the test will be disturbed by experimental errors. The uncertainty factor “i” is uncertain between 1 and -1, representing an influential factor. | ||||||
下载: 导出CSV表72005-2014年西北内陆棉区常规棉主要纤维品质性状的同异分析
Table7.Identical and different analysis on main fiber quality characters of conventional cultivars in the Northwest Inland from 2005 to 2014
| 品种 Cultivar | 综合同一度 Comprehensive homogenity | 同异联系式 Difference contact style | 同异联系势值 Difference contact style value | 联系势 Contact style | 联系势测验 Contact style trial | 位次 Order |
| DJ3061 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0+0.000 0i | ∞ | 准同势?Half similar | a | 1 |
| 6802 | 0.976 0 | 0.976 0+0.024 0i | 40.67 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 2 |
| THA-27 | 0.973 4 | 0.973 4+0.026 6i | 36.59 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 3 |
| KC127 | 0.959 0 | 0.959 0+0.041 0i | 23.39 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 4 |
| K215 | 0.956 2 | 0.956 2+0.043 8i | 21.83 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 5 |
| 农9138?Nong 9138 | 0.951 8 | 0.951 8+0.048 2i | 19.75 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 6 |
| 农9130?Nong 9130 | 0.935 7 | 0.935 7+0.064 3i | 14.55 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 7 |
| 巴40691?Ba 40691 | 0.934 4 | 0.934 4+0.065 6i | 14.24 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 8 |
| 农信一号?Nongxin 1 | 0.934 2 | 0.934 2+0.065 8i | 14.20 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 9 |
| X5216 | 0.932 3 | 0.932 3+0.067 7i | 13.77 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 10 |
| WS-05 | 0.929 3 | 0.929 3+0.070 7i | 13.14 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 11 |
| 汇丰297?Huifeng 297 | 0.926 2 | 0.926 2+0.073 8i | 12.55 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 12 |
| 9858 | 0.924 1 | 0.924 1+0.075 9i | 12.18 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 13 |
| 华萃棉9号?Huacuimian 9 | 0.924 0 | 0.924 0+0.076 0i | 12.16 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 14 |
| 新桑塔6号?Xinsangta 6 | 0.917 7 | 0.917 7+0.082 3i | 11.15 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 15 |
| 禾棉A9-9?HemianA 9-9 | 0.917 5 | 0.917 5+0.082 5i | 11.12 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 16 |
| 惠祥3号?Huixiang 3 | 0.915 7 | 0.915 7+0.084 3i | 10.86 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 17 |
| H038 | 0.915 5 | 0.915 5+0.084 5i | 10.83 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 18 |
| RM644 | 0.907 7 | 0.907 7+0.092 3i | 9.83 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 19 |
| K516 | 0.906 8 | 0.906 8+0.093 2i | 9.73 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 20 |
| S02-21 | 0.906 6 | 0.906 6+0.093 4i | 9.71 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 21 |
| TH-10-81 | 0.904 9 | 0.904 9+0.095 1i | 9.52 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 22 |
| 中1608-8?Zhong 1608-8 | 0.904 7 | 0.904 7+0.095 3i | 9.49 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 23 |
| B17468 | 0.904 6 | 0.904 6+0.095 4i | 9.48 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 24 |
| 塔09-1446?Ta 09-1446 | 0.900 0 | 0.900 0+0.100 0i | 9.00 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 25 |
| 银瑞6号?Yinrui 6 | 0.897 3 | 0.897 3+0.102 7i | 8.74 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 26 |
| DJ09-520 | 0.897 0 | 0.897 0+0.103 0i | 8.71 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 27 |
| J206-5 | 0.897 0 | 0.897 0+0.103 0i | 8.71 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 28 |
| 2000--2 | 0.895 2 | 0.895 2+0.104 8i | 8.54 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 29 |
| 新陆中47号?Xinluzhong 47 | 0.894 8 | 0.894 8+0.105 2i | 8.51 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 30 |
| 拓农5号?Tuonong 5 | 0.893 5 | 0.893 5+0.106 5i | 8.39 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 31 |
| B32 | 0.892 7 | 0.892 7+0.107 3i | 8.32 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 32 |
| 创棉35?Chuangmian 35 | 0.892 3 | 0.892 3+0.107 7i | 8.29 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 33 |
| 田丰2号?Tianfeng 2 | 0.892 2 | 0.892 2+0.107 8i | 8.28 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 34 |
| K20-16 | 0.889 8 | 0.889 8+0.110 2i | 8.07 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 35 |
| HY-1 | 0.888 7 | 0.888 7+0.111 3i | 7.98 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 36 |
| 创棉501?Chuangmian 501 | 0.888 3 | 0.888 3+0.111 7i | 7.95 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 37 |
| 汇丰0935系?Huifeng 0935xi | 0.887 1 | 0.887 1+0.112 9i | 7.86 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 38 |
| 西棉318?Ximian 318 | 0.886 7 | 0.886 7+0.113 3i | 7.83 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 39 |
| 神生12号?Shensheng 12 | 0.884 2 | 0.884 2+0.115 8i | 7.64 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 40 |
| 吉田17号?Jitian 17 | 0.884 1 | 0.884 1+0.115 9i | 7.63 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 41 |
| 巴13222?Ba 13222 | 0.884 0 | 0.884 0+0.116 0i | 7.62 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 42 |
| K3128 | 0.878 8 | 0.878 8+0.121 2i | 7.25 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 43 |
| 创锦棉39?Chuangjinmian 39 | 0.876 3 | 0.876 3+0.123 7i | 7.08 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 44 |
| 中棉所49?Zhongmiansuo 49 | 0.873 9 | 0.873 9+0.126 1i | 6.93 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 45 |
| 中棉所35?Zhongmiansuo 35 | 0.872 8 | 0.872 8+0.127 2i | 6.86 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 46 |
| 赛浦棉一号?Saipumian 1 | 0.867 9 | 0.867 9+0.132 1i | 6.57 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 47 |
| 金新9号?Jinxin 9 | 0.867 7 | 0.867 7+0.132 3i | 6.56 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 48 |
| 承天1号?Chengtian 1 | 0.866 9 | 0.866 9+0.133 1i | 6.51 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 49 |
| 新46?Xin 46 | 0.862 5 | 0.862 5+0.137 5i | 6.27 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 50 |
| MS90836 | 0.862 4 | 0.862 4+0.137 6i | 6.27 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 51 |
| 巴19556?Ba 19556 | 0.860 0 | 0.860 0+0.140 0i | 6.14 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 52 |
| 康地3038?Kangdi 3038 | 0.859 5 | 0.859 5+0.140 5i | 6.12 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 53 |
| 新木棉11号?Xinmumian 11 | 0.856 3 | 0.856 3+0.143 7i | 5.96 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 54 |
| 创棉50号?Chuangmian 50 | 0.856 2 | 0.856 2+0.143 8i | 5.95 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 55 |
| 惠祥10号?Huixiang 10 | 0.855 0 | 0.855 0+0.145 0i | 5.90 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 56 |
| 鑫秋6号?Xinqiu 6 | 0.849 9 | 0.849 9+0.150 1i | 5.66 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 57 |
| 禾棉H109?HemianH 109 | 0.849 3 | 0.849 3+0.150 7i | 5.64 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 58 |
| 承天10-70?Chengtian 10-70 | 0.847 8 | 0.847 8+0.152 2i | 5.57 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 59 |
| 2--3 | 0.847 6 | 0.847 6+0.152 4i | 5.56 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 60 |
| 淮棉125系?Huaimian 125xi | 0.842 4 | 0.842 4+0.157 6i | 5.35 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 61 |
| 农13-21?Nong13-21 | 0.841 2 | 0.841 2+0.158 8i | 5.30 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 62 |
| 神农棉1号?Shennongmian 1 | 0.838 1 | 0.838 1+0.161 9i | 5.18 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 63 |
| 新木棉1号?Xinmumian 1 | 0.834 3 | 0.834 3+0.165 7i | 5.04 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 64 |
| K158 | 0.831 8 | 0.831 8+0.168 2i | 4.95 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 65 |
| 惠祥8号?Huixiang 8 | 0.830 0 | 0.830 0+0.170 0i | 4.88 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 66 |
| C1017 | 0.816 9 | 0.816 9+0.183 1i | 4.46 | 强同势?Strong similar | a | 67 |
| 圣农?JXZ6H119?Shengnong JXZ6H 119 | 0.808 5 | 0.808 5+0.191 5i | 4.22 | 弱同势?Weak similar | b | 68 |
| 平均?Average | 0.890 5 | 0.890 5+0.109 5i | 9.72 | |||
| a表示品种间综合性状无显著差异; b表示品种间综合性状达显著差异。i是一个不确定系数, 由于环境、气候、施肥、浇水、管理等不确定因素的影响, 试验会受到试验误差的干扰, 不确定系数i在1与-1之间不确定取值, 代表一种影响因素。“a” indicates no significant difference in the combination of traits among cultivars; “b” indicates significant differences in interspecies traits. “i” is an uncertainty factor. Due to uncertainties such as the environment, climate, fertilization, watering, and management, the test will be disturbed by experimental errors. The uncertainty factor “i” is uncertain between 1 and -1, representing an influential factor. | ||||||
下载: 导出CSV参考文献
| [1] | 中国农业科学院棉花研究所.中国棉花栽培学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2013 Cotton Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Chinese Cotton Cultivation[M]. Shanghai:Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 2013 |
| [2] | 袁有禄, 张天真, 郭旺珍, 等.棉花高品质纤维性状的主基因与多基因遗传分析[J].遗传学报, 2002, 29(9):827-834 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ycxb200209014 YUAN Y L, ZHANG T Z, GUO W Z, et al. Major-polygene effect analysis of super quality fiber properties in upland cotton (G. hirsutum L.)[J]. Acta Genetica Sinica, 2002, 29(9):827-834 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ycxb200209014 |
| [3] | AL-JIBOURI H A, MILLER P A, ROBINSON H F. Genotypic and environmental variances and covariances in an upland cotton cross of interspecific origin[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1958, (10):633-636 doi: 10.2134-agronj1958.00021962005000100020x/ |
| [4] | KOHEL R J. Cotton germplasm resources and the potential for improved fiber production and quality[M]//BASRA A S. Cotton Fibers: Developmental Biology, Quality Improvement, and Textile Processing. New York: The Haworth Press Inc, 1999: 167-182 |
| [5] | PERCY R G, CANTRELL R G, ZHANG J F. Genetic variation for agronomic and fiber properties in an introgressed recombinant inbred population of cotton[J]. Crop Science, 2006, 46(3):1311-1317 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.08-0284 |
| [6] | 束红梅, 王友华, 陈兵林, 等.棉花纤维素累积特性的基因型差异及与纤维比强度形成的关系[J].作物学报, 2007, 33(6):921-926 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.06.009 SHU H M, WANG Y H, CHEN B L, et al. Genotypic differences in cellulose accumulation of cotton fiber and its relationship with fiber strength[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007, 33(6):921-926 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.06.009 |
| [7] | YEATES S J, CONSTABLE G A, MCCUMSTIE T. Irrigated cotton in the tropical dry season. Ⅲ:Impact of temperature, cultivar and sowing date on fibre quality[J]. Field Crops Research, 2010, 116(3):300-307 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.01.006 |
| [8] | ZHAO D, OOSTERHUIS D M. Cotton responses to shade at different growth stages:Growth, lint yield and fibre quality[J]. Experimental Agriculture, 2000, 36(1):27-39 doi: 10.1017/S0014479700361014 |
| [9] | PETTIGREW W T. Environmental effects on cotton fiber carbohydrate concentration and quality[J]. Crop Science, 2001, 41(4):1108-1113 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2001.4141108x |
| [10] | SHU H M, ZHOU Z G, XU N Y, et al. Sucrose metabolism in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fibre under low temperature during fibre development[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2009, 31(2):61-68 doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2009.03.004 |
| [11] | READ J J, REDDY K R, JENKINS J N. Yield and fiber quality of Upland cotton as influenced by nitrogen and potassium nutrition[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2006, 24(3):282-290 doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2005.10.004 |
| [12] | PETTIGREW W T, ADAMCZYK J J. Nitrogen fertility and planting date effects on lint yield and Cry1Ac (Bt) endotoxin production[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2006, 98(3):691-697 doi: 10.2134/agronj2005.0327 |
| [13] | GIRMA K, TEAL R K, FREEMAN K W, et al. Cotton lint yield and quality as affected by applications of N, P, and K fertilizers[J]. Journal of Cotton Science, 2007, 11(1):12-19 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=Open J-Gate000000604208 |
| [14] | 阎守邑, 肖春生, 田青, 等.中国农业统计地理信息系统及其应用研究[J].遥感学报, 1997, 1(3):152-157 YAN S Y, XIAO C S, TIAN Q, et al. Chinese agricultural statistical Geographic Information System and its applications[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 1997, 1(3):152-157 |
| [15] | 危常州, 侯振安, 朱和明, 等.基于GIS的棉田精冷施肥和土壤养分管理系统的研究[J].中国农业科学, 2002, 35(6):678-685 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2002.06.017 WEI C Z, HOU Z A, ZHU H M, et al. Study on precision fertilizer recommendation and soil nutrition management in cotton land based on GIS system[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2002, 35(6):678-685 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2002.06.017 |
| [16] | 周留根, 周治国, 曹卫星, 等.基于知识模型和GIS的棉花生产潜力评价系统[J].棉花学报, 2005, 17(2):117-121 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2005.02.011 ZHOU L G, ZHOU Z G, CAO W X, et al. Cotton potential productivity evaluation system based on knowledge model and GIS[J]. Cotton Science, 2005, 17(2):117-121 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2005.02.011 |
| [17] | 潘学标.基于GIS的中国县域棉花生产空间分布与变异研究[J].中国农业科学, 2003, 36(4):382-386 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2003.04.005 PAN X B. Study on the spatial distribution and variation of cotton production in counties of China based on GIS[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2003, 36(4):382-386 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2003.04.005 |
| [18] | 潘学标.基于GIS的中国作物生产信息系统研究[J].中国农业科学, 2000, 33(2):110 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2000.02.020 PAN X B. Research on the China's crop production information system based on GIS[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2000, 33(2):110 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2000.02.020 |
| [19] | 郭瑞林, 王占中.作物同异育种智能决策系统及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社, 2014 GUO R L, WANG Z Z. Intelligent Decision System of Crops Breeding with Similarity-Difference and Its Applications[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2014 |
| [20] | 郭瑞林, 杨春玲, 关立, 等.小麦品种区域试验的同异分析方法研究[J].麦类作物学报, 2001, 21(3):60-63 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1041.2001.03.015 GUO R L, YANG C L, GUAN L, et al. Study on identical and different analysis method of wheat variety regional test[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2001, 21(3):60-63 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1041.2001.03.015 |
| [21] | 郭瑞林.同异分析的联系势测验及其在小麦品种区域试验中的应用[J].麦类作物学报, 2004, 24(1):63-65 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1041.2004.01.017 GUO R L. The test of connection trend for the similarity-difference analysis and its application in regional test of wheat variety[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2004, 24(1):63-65 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1041.2004.01.017 |
| [22] | 郭瑞林.作物育种同异理论与方法[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社, 2011 GUO R L. The Method and Similarity-difference Theory of Crop Breeding[M]. Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2011 |
| [23] | 凌启鸿.作物群体质量[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2000 LING Q H. Crop Population Quality[M]. Shanghai:Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 2000 |
| [24] | 刘瑞显, 史伟, 徐立华, 等.长江下游棉区抗虫杂交棉适宜密度研究[J].棉花学报, 2010, 22(6):634-638 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2010.06.020 LIU R X, SHI W, XU L H, et al. Planting density of insect-resistant hybrid cotton in lower reaches of Yangtze River Valley[J]. Cotton Science, 2010, 22(6):634-638 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2010.06.020 |
| [25] | 周桂生, 于建平, 陈刚, 等.关于长江流域棉花适宜种植密度的思考[J].中国棉花, 2007, (5):51-52 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-632X.2007.05.031 ZHOU G S, YU J P, CHEN G, et al. Thinking about the suitable planting density of cotton in Yangtze river basin[J] China Cotton, 2007, (5):51-52 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-632X.2007.05.031 |
| [26] | 王仁祥.转基因抗虫杂交棉纤维品质性状的构成因素和遗传特性的研究[D].长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2005 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10537-2005107534.htm WANG R X. Study on compositive factors and genetic characteristics of fiber quality of transgenic Bt hybrid cotton[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2005 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10537-2005107534.htm |
| [27] | 李吉琴.杂交棉产量及品质构成因素的主成分分析[J].石河子科技, 2011, (1):21-23 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0899.2011.01.008 LI J Q. Principal component analysis of yield and quality components of hybrid cotton[J]. Shihezi Technology, 2011, (1):21-23 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0899.2011.01.008 |
| [28] | 喻树迅, 王子胜.中国棉花科技未来发展战略构想[J].沈阳农业大学学报:社会科学版, 2012, 14(1):3-10 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/synydxxb-sh201201004 YU S X, WANG Z S. On the future Chinese cotton technological development strategy[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University:Social Sciences Edition, 2012, 14(1):3-10 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/synydxxb-sh201201004 |
| [29] | 纪从亮.棉花高产优质高效栽培实用技术[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2002 JI C L. Practical Technology for High Yield, High Quality and High Efficiency Cultivation of Cotton[M]. Beijing:China Agricultural Publishing House, 2002 |
| [30] | 郭香墨, 刘正德, 罗云佳.我国面向21世纪棉花纤维品质改良对策[J].棉花学报, 1999, 11(6):321-325 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199901014645 GUO X M, LIU Z D, LUO Y J. The improvement strategy of cotton fibre quality for the 21st century in China[J]. Acta Gossypii Sinica, 1999, 11(6):321-325 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199901014645 |
