删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

神经重用假说的汉语情绪词汇加工证据

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

孙天义1, 郝晓晓2, 何安明1, 王财玉1, 许远理1, 郭春彦3, 周蔚3()
1信阳师范学院教育科学学院, 河南 信阳 464000
2郑州理工职业学院, 郑州 451100
3首都师范大学心理学院, 北京 100048
收稿日期:2019-10-17出版日期:2021-09-25发布日期:2021-07-22
通讯作者:周蔚E-mail:zhouwei@cnu.edu.cn

基金资助:河南省科技发展计划项目(202400410143);信阳师范学院“南湖****奖励计划”青年项目资助。

Evidence for neural re-use hypothesis from the processing of Chinese emotional words

SUN Tianyi1, HAO Xiaoxiao2, HE Anming1, WANG Caiyu1, XU Yuanli1, GUO Chunyan3, ZHOU Wei3()
1School of Education Science, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China
2Zhengzhou Institute of Technology, Zhengzhou, 451100, China
3College of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
Received:2019-10-17Online:2021-09-25Published:2021-07-22
Contact:ZHOU Wei E-mail:zhouwei@cnu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 神经重用假说认为对词的情绪效应可以不经语义形成而先行产生, 这更有助于人类适应环境。为了检验这一假说, 设计脑电实验和行为实验, 记录被试加工汉语厌恶情绪词和中性词的特征。结果发现, 170 ms左右厌恶词与中性词的ERPs发生分离, 且在枕部出现情绪刺激视觉注意关联的EPN; 厌恶词与中性词N400差异波溯源定位于脑岛附近, 其最大激活点时间窗口开始于380 ms。这表明在情绪词汇的语义分析之前就出现了情绪效应, 结果支持了神经重用假说。


表1词汇变量评分的平均数及标准差(M-平均值、SD-标准差)
变量 词的评分
厌恶词(M ± SD) 中性词(M ± SD)
效价 1.69 ± 0.22 3.31 ± 0.29
唤醒度 2.95 ± 0.35 2.41 ± 0.38
形象性 3.37 ± 0.49 3.74 ± 0.68
熟悉性 3.37 ± 0.64 3.81 ± 0.81

表1词汇变量评分的平均数及标准差(M-平均值、SD-标准差)
变量 词的评分
厌恶词(M ± SD) 中性词(M ± SD)
效价 1.69 ± 0.22 3.31 ± 0.29
唤醒度 2.95 ± 0.35 2.41 ± 0.38
形象性 3.37 ± 0.49 3.74 ± 0.68
熟悉性 3.37 ± 0.64 3.81 ± 0.81



图1刺激呈现流程图
图1刺激呈现流程图



图2总的ERP波形图和中线电极差异波的地形图
图2总的ERP波形图和中线电极差异波的地形图


表2电极位置及平均电位值(M-平均值、SD-标准差(μV))
电极位置 脑电成分的电位
P100 EPN
厌恶词(M ± SD) 中性词(M ± SD) 厌恶词(M ± SD) 中性词(M ± SD)
左(O1) 4.49 ± 3.44 4.11 ± 4.24 -3.72 ± 3.56 -3.57 ± 2.71
中(Oz) 2.52 ± 4.07 2.51 ± 4.51 -2.96 ± 3.75 -2.55 ± 2.96
右(O2) 3.71 ± 5.93 3.73 ± 6.18 -3.77 ± 4.57 -2.74 ± 3.93

表2电极位置及平均电位值(M-平均值、SD-标准差(μV))
电极位置 脑电成分的电位
P100 EPN
厌恶词(M ± SD) 中性词(M ± SD) 厌恶词(M ± SD) 中性词(M ± SD)
左(O1) 4.49 ± 3.44 4.11 ± 4.24 -3.72 ± 3.56 -3.57 ± 2.71
中(Oz) 2.52 ± 4.07 2.51 ± 4.51 -2.96 ± 3.75 -2.55 ± 2.96
右(O2) 3.71 ± 5.93 3.73 ± 6.18 -3.77 ± 4.57 -2.74 ± 3.93


表3中央电极平均电位值(M-平均值、SD-标准差(μV))
电极位置 分析时窗下的电位
300~500 ms 500~700 ms
厌恶词(M ± SD) 中性词(M ± SD) 厌恶词(M ± SD) 中性词(M ± SD)
FPz -0.15 ± 2.61 0.52 ± 2.83 1.73 ± 2.15 1.31 ± 2.46
Fz 2.49 ± 2.89 0.50 ± 2.74 2.92 ± 2.41 0.76 ± 1.88
Cz 4.74 ± 4.40 1.72 ± 3.51 5.58 ± 4.19 2.80 ± 2.92
Pz 5.50 ± 4.54 2.83 ± 3.55 5.17 ± 4.58 3.09 ± 3.26
Oz 2.13 ± 2.76 0.53 ± 2.64 2.01 ± 2.67 1.09 ± 2.21

表3中央电极平均电位值(M-平均值、SD-标准差(μV))
电极位置 分析时窗下的电位
300~500 ms 500~700 ms
厌恶词(M ± SD) 中性词(M ± SD) 厌恶词(M ± SD) 中性词(M ± SD)
FPz -0.15 ± 2.61 0.52 ± 2.83 1.73 ± 2.15 1.31 ± 2.46
Fz 2.49 ± 2.89 0.50 ± 2.74 2.92 ± 2.41 0.76 ± 1.88
Cz 4.74 ± 4.40 1.72 ± 3.51 5.58 ± 4.19 2.80 ± 2.92
Pz 5.50 ± 4.54 2.83 ± 3.55 5.17 ± 4.58 3.09 ± 3.26
Oz 2.13 ± 2.76 0.53 ± 2.64 2.01 ± 2.67 1.09 ± 2.21



图3N400成分差异波的溯源分析图
图3N400成分差异波的溯源分析图


厌恶词汇 中性词汇 交通工具词汇
粪肉 尿味 窗户 个体 火车 帆船
粪便 狗屎 橡皮 衣柜 汽车 轮船
口臭 粪桶 筷子 护照 动车 游船
臊臭 便池 副刊 盒子 轿车 客船
臭气 蛆虫 邮编 文件 卡车 渔船
大便 粪土 地幔 事物 高铁 游艇
蝇蛆 粪堆 邮票 路灯 跑车
粪坑 痰盂 影子 池塘 游轮
狐臭 汗臭 纽扣 空调 邮轮
臭味 鸟屎 桌子 沙发 客轮
臭屁 鼻屎 椅子 踏板 机车
屎尿 粪筐 磁石 剪子 客车
粪池 粘液 茶瓶 墙壁 电车
粪水 便盆 链条 电视 飞机
恶臭 苍蝇 地板 胶卷 客机
尿盆 腐烂 秘书 键盘 地铁
肉虫 腐肉 地图 波浪 巴士
脚臭 麻雀 摩托

厌恶词汇 中性词汇 交通工具词汇
粪肉 尿味 窗户 个体 火车 帆船
粪便 狗屎 橡皮 衣柜 汽车 轮船
口臭 粪桶 筷子 护照 动车 游船
臊臭 便池 副刊 盒子 轿车 客船
臭气 蛆虫 邮编 文件 卡车 渔船
大便 粪土 地幔 事物 高铁 游艇
蝇蛆 粪堆 邮票 路灯 跑车
粪坑 痰盂 影子 池塘 游轮
狐臭 汗臭 纽扣 空调 邮轮
臭味 鸟屎 桌子 沙发 客轮
臭屁 鼻屎 椅子 踏板 机车
屎尿 粪筐 磁石 剪子 客车
粪池 粘液 茶瓶 墙壁 电车
粪水 便盆 链条 电视 飞机
恶臭 苍蝇 地板 胶卷 客机
尿盆 腐烂 秘书 键盘 地铁
肉虫 腐肉 地图 波浪 巴士
脚臭 麻雀 摩托







[1] An S.K., Lee S.J., Lee C.H., Cho H.S., Lee P.G., Lee C.I., … Namkoong K. (2003). Reduced P3 amplitudes by negative facial emotional photographs in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 64(2-3), 125-135.
[2] Anderson M.L. (2007). Evolution of cognitive function via redeployment of brain areas. Neuroscientist, 13(1), 13-21.
pmid: 17229971
[3] Anderson M.L. (2010). Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(4), 245-266.
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000853pmid: 20964882
[4] Bayer M., Sommer W., & Schacht A. (2010). Reading emotional words within sentences: The impact of arousal and valence on event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 78(3), 299-307.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.09.004URL
[5] Borg C., Bedoin N., Peyron R., Bogey S., Laurent B., & Thomas-Antérion C. (2013). Impaired emotional processing in a patient with a left posterior insula-SII lesion. Neurocase, 19(6), 592-603.
doi: 10.1080/13554794.2012.713491URL
[6] Buyukturkoglu K., Roettgers H., Sommer J., Rana M., Dietzsch L., Arikan E.B., … Ruiz S. (2015). Correction: Self-regulation of anterior insula with real-time fmri and its behavioral effects in obsessive-compulsive disorder: A feasibility study. PLoS ONE, 10(12), e0145027.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145027URL
[7] Chen H.C., & Shu H. (2001). Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence against early phonological activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 511-518.
doi: 10.3758/BF03196186URL
[8] Citron F.M. (2012). Neural correlates of written emotion word processing: A review of recent electrophysiological and hemodynamic neuroimaging studies. Brain and Language, 122(3), 211-226.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.007URL
[9] Dehaene S., & Cohen L. (2007). Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron, 56(2), 384-398.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.004URL
[10] Dehaene S., Cohen L., Sigman M., & Vinckier F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 335-341.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004URL
[11] Delplanque S., Silvert L., Hot P., & Sequeira H. (2005). Event-related p3a and p3b in response to unpredictable emotional stimuli. Biological Psychology, 68(2), 107-120.
pmid: 15450691
[12] Dering B., Martin C.D., Moro S., Pegna A.J., & Thierry G. (2011). Face-sensitive processes one hundred milliseconds after picture onset. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(93), 93.
[13] Dietrich D.E., Emrich H.M., Waller C., Wieringa B.M., Johannes S., & Münte T.F. (2000). Emotion/cognition- coupling in word recognition memory of depressive patients: An event-related potential study. Psychiatry Research, 96(1), 15-29.
pmid: 10980323
[14] Fischler I., & Bradley M. (2006). Event-related potential studies of language and emotion: Words, phrases, and task effects. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 185-203.
pmid: 17015080
[15] Grainger J., & Holcomb P.J. (2009). Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language & Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 128-156.
[16] Groves K., Kennett S., & Gillmeister H. (2017). Evidence for ERP biomarkers of eating disorder symptoms in women. Biological Psychology, 123, 205-219.
doi: S0301-0511(16)30399-4pmid: 28057515
[17] Herbert C., Junghofer M., & Kissler J. (2008). Event related potentials to emotional adjectives during reading. Psychophysiology, 45(3), 487-498.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00638.xURL
[18] Isenberg N., Silbersweig D., Engelien A., Emmerich S., Malavade K., Beattie B., … Stern E. (1999). Linguistic threat activates the human amygdala. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(18), 10456-10459.
[19] Job X.E.,de Fockert, J. W., & van Velzen, J. (2016). Action preparation modulates sensory perception in unseen personal space: An electrophysiological investigation. Neuropsychologia, 89, 445-452.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.021URL
[20] Kanske P., & Kotz S.A. (2007). Concreteness in emotional words: ERP evidence from a hemifield study. Brain Research, 1148, 138-148.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.044URL
[21] Kissler J., Assadollahi R., & Herbert C. (2006). Emotional and semantic networks in visual word processing: Insights from ERP studies. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 147-183.
[22] Kissler J., Herbert C., Peyk P., & Junghofer M. (2007). Buzzwords: Early cortical responses to emotional words during reading. Psychological Science, 18(6), 475-480.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01924.xURL
[23] Kousta S.T., Vinson D.P., & Vigliocco G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112(3), 473-481.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.007URL
[24] Krolak-Salmon P., Hénaff M.-A., Isnard J., Tallon-Baudry C., Guénot M., Vighetto A., … Mauguière F. (2010). An attention modulated response to disgust in human ventral anterior insula. Annals of Neurology, 53(4), 446-453.
doi: 10.1002/ana.10502URL
[25] Kutas M., & Federmeier K.D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621-647.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123URL
[26] Li Y.T., Li Q., & Guo C.Y. (2010). Differences of emotional words in implicit and explicit memory tests: An ERP study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42(7), 735-742.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2010.00735URL
[ 李月婷, 李琦, 郭春彦. (2010). 内隐和外显记忆测验中情绪词差异的ERP研究. 心理学报, 42(7), 735-742.]
[27] Liu H., Hu Z., Peng D., Yang Y., & Li K. (2010). Common and segregated neural substrates for automatic conceptual and affective priming as revealed by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain & Language, 112(2), 121-128.
[28] Liu Y., Lin W., Xu P., Zhang D., & Luo Y. (2015). Neural basis of disgust perception in racial prejudice. Human Brain Mapping, 36(12), 5275-5286.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.v36.12URL
[29] Luo Y. J., Huang Y., X., Li X., Y., & Li X., B. (2006). Effects of emotion on cognitive processing: Series of Event-Related Potentials study. Advances in Psychological Science, 14(4), 505-510.
[ 罗跃嘉, 黄宇霞, 李新影, 李雪冰. (2006). 情绪对认知加工的影响: 事件相关脑电位系列研究. 心理科学进展, 14(4), 505-510.]
[30] Luo Y., Shen W., Zhang Y., Feng T.Y., Huang H., & Li H. (2013). Core disgust and moral disgust are related to distinct spatiotemporal patterns of neural processing: An event-related potential study. Biological Psychology, 94(2), 242-248.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.06.005pmid: 23816951
[31] Maratos E.J., Allan K., & Rugg M.D. (2000). Recognition memory for emotionally negative and neutral words: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 38(11), 1452-1465.
pmid: 10906371
[32] Meng X., Jian J., Shu H., Tian X., & Zhou X.. (2008). ERP correlates of the development of orthographical and phonological processing during Chinese sentence reading. Brain Research, 1219, 91-102.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.04.052URL
[33] Niedenthal P.M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316(5827), 1002-1005.
pmid: 17510358
[34] Perfetti C.A., Nelson J., Liu Y., Fiez J., & Tan L.H. (2010). The neural basis of reading:Universals and writing system variations. In: P. L. Cornelissen, P.C. Hansen, L.M. Kringelbach, & A. K. Pugh (Eds.), The neural basis of reading (pp.147-172). New York: Oxford University Press.
[35] Ponz A., Montant M., Liegeois-Chauvel C., Silva C., Braun M., Jacobs A.M., & Ziegler J.C. (2013). Emotion processing in words: A test of the neural re-use hypothesis using surface and intracranial EEG. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(5), 619-627.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nst034URL
[36] Pulvermüller F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(7), 576-582.
pmid: 15959465
[37] Schacht A., & Sommer W. (2009a). Emotions in word and face processing: Early and late cortical responses. Brain & Cognition, 69(3), 538-550.
[38] Schacht A., & Sommer W. (2009b). Time course and task dependence of emotion effects in word processing. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(1), 28-43.
[39] Schienle A., Übel S., & Wabnegger A. (2016). When opposites lead to the same: A direct comparison of explicit and implicit disgust regulation via fmri. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 12(3), 445-451.
[40] Schindler S., Vormbrock R., & Kissler J. (2019). Emotion in context?: How sender predictability and identity affect processing of words as imminent personality feedback. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(2), 1-16.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00001URL
[41] Schupp H.T., Junghöfer M., Weike A.I., & Hamm A.O. (2004). The selective processing of briefly presented affective pictures: An ERP analysis. Psychophysiology, 41(3), 441-449.
doi: 10.1111/psyp.2004.41.issue-3URL
[42] Tadel F., Baillet S., Mosher J.C., Pantazis D., & Leahy R.M. (2011). Brainstorm: A user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011(1687-5265), 879716.
[43] Tonoyan Y., Chanwimalueang T., Mandic D.P., & van Hulle M.M. (2017). Discrimination of emotional states from scalp-and intracranial EEG using multiscale Rényi entropy. PLoS ONE, 12(11), e0186916.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186916URL
[44] Valt C., & Stürmer B. (2018). Processing genuine and nongenuine smiles as social response to personal performance: An event-related brain potential (ERP) study. Emotion, 18(4), 551-562.
doi: 10.1037/emo0000327URL
[45] Wang Y.N., Zhou L.M., & Luo Y.J. (2008). The pilot establishment and evaluation of Chinese affective words system. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 22(8), 608-612.
[ 王一牛, 周立明, 罗跃嘉. (2008). 汉语情感词系统的初步编制及评定. 中国心理卫生杂志, 22(8), 608-612.]
[46] Wang Z.,H., & Yao Z. (2012). Concreteness effects of emotional noun words: Evidences from ERP. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(2), 154-165.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.00154URL
[ 王振宏, 姚昭. (2012). 情绪名词的具体性效应: 来自ERP的证据. 心理学报, 44(2), 154-165.]
[47] Watkins T.J., Di I.C., Olatunji B.O., Benningfield M.M., Blackford J.U., Dietrich M.S., … Cowan R.L. (2015). Disgust proneness and associated neural substrates in obesity. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 11(3), 458-465.
[48] Yao Z., Yu D.S., Wang L.L.W., Zhu X.R., Guo J.J., & Wang Z.H. (2016). Effects of valence and arousal on emotional word processing are modulated by concreteness: Behavioral and ERP evidence from a lexical decision task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 100, 231-242.
[49] Yi S.N., He W.Q., Zhan L., Qi Z.Y., Zhu C.L., Luo W.B., & Li H. (2015). Emotional noun processing: An ERP study with rapid serial visual presentation. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0118924.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118924URL
[50] Zhang D.D., He W.Q., Wang T., Luo W.B., Zhu X.R., Gu R.L., … Luo Y.J. (2014). Three stages of emotional word processing: An ERP study with rapid serial visual presentation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(12), 1897-1903.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nst188URL
[51] Zhang M., Ge Y., Kang C., Guo T., & Peng D. (2018). ERP evidence for the contribution of meaning complexity underlying emotional word processing. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 45, 110-118.
doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.07.002URL
[52] Zhao W.S., Chen L., Zhou C.X., & Luo W.B. (2018). Neural correlates of emotion processing in word detection task. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 832.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00832URL
[53] Zhou A., Zhang R., Xia R., Li S., & Ma X. (2016). The perspective modulation in the early processing of self- reflective. Journal of Psychological Science, 39(2), 384-391.
[ 周爱保, 张荣华, 夏瑞雪, 李世峰, 马小凤. (2016). 视角在自我评价早期阶段的调节作用. 心理科学, 39(2), 384-391.]
[54] Zhou X., & Marslen-Wilson W. (1999). Phonology, orthography, and semantic activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 579-606.
doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2663URL
[55] Zhou W., Shu H., Miller K., & Yan M. (2018). Reliance on orthography and phonology in reading of Chinese: A developmental study. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 370-391.
doi: 10.1111/jrir.v41.2URL
[56] Zhu L.P., Yuan J.J., & Li H. (2011). The influence of emotional valence and intensity on vocabulary processing. Journal of Psychological Science, 34(2), 284-288.
[ 朱丽萍, 袁加锦, 李红. (2011). 情绪效价及强度对词汇加工的影响. 心理科学, 34(2), 284-288.]




[1]田一, 王莉, 许燕, 焦丽颖. 中国人社会善念的心理结构[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(9): 1003-1017.
[2]张瑞, 王振华, 王小娟, 杨剑峰. 汉字识别中亚词汇语音和语义信息在N170上的神经适应[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(8): 807-820.
[3]曹敏, 谢和平, 孙丽君, 张冬静, 孔繁昌, 周宗奎. 网络游戏中化身参照的加工优势:来自行为与ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(6): 639-650.
[4]周文洁, 邓丽群, 丁锦红. 物体颜色对情景记忆的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(3): 229-243.
[5]张清芳, 钱宗愉, 朱雪冰. 汉语口语词汇产生中的多重音韵激活:单词翻译任务的ERP研究[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(1): 1-14.
[6]张琪, 邓娜丽, 姜秀敏, 李卫君. 自我相关性影响情绪词汇加工的时间进程[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(8): 946-957.
[7]张银玲, 虞祯, 买晓琴. 社会价值取向对自我-他人风险决策的影响及其机制[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(7): 895-908.
[8]李琎, 孙宇, 杨子鹿, 钟毅平. 社会价值取向对自我社会奖赏加工的影响——来自ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(6): 786-800.
[9]张清芳, 王雪娇. 汉语口语词汇产生的音韵编码单元:内隐启动范式的ERP研究[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(4): 414-425.
[10]于宙, 张清芳. 句法结构和动词重复对汉语句子口语产生中句法启动效应的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(3): 283-293.
[11]郑志灵, 王鹏飞, 苏得权, 郭伟杰, 孙楠, 麻彦坤, 曾红. 不同相关线索下海洛因成瘾者的反应差异及反应抑制特征:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(3): 317-328.
[12]陈红君, 赵英, 伍新春, 孙鹏, 谢瑞波, 冯杰. 小学儿童词汇知识与阅读理解的关系:交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(8): 924-934.
[13]耿晓伟, 房津如, 韩彦芳, 李中权, 赵蜜, 杨烨. 道德相对主义和厌恶情绪对道德直觉判断的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(4): 517-526.
[14]张蕾, 鲁成柔, 林军凤, 梅磊磊. 学习材料组块方式对相似词长时记忆的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(3): 280-292.
[15]娄昊, 李丛, 张清芳. 习得年龄对客体和动作图画口语命名的不同影响:ERP研究[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(2): 143-153.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5037
相关话题/心理 汉语 社会 中央 科学