删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

侗歌经验对侗族中学生执行功能的影响

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

王婷1, 植凤英2, 陆禹同1, 张积家1()
1. 中国人民大学心理学系、国家民委民族语言文化心理重点研究基地、教育部民族教育发展中心民族心理与教育重点研究基地, 北京 100872
2. 贵州师范大学教育科学学院, 贵阳 550001
收稿日期:2018-08-08出版日期:2019-08-21发布日期:2019-07-24
通讯作者:张积家E-mail:Zhangjj1955@163.com

基金资助:* 中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助)项目“语言影响人格:来自双语者与双言者的行为与生理证据” 阶段性成果(7XNL002)

Effect of Dong Chorus on the executive function of Dong high school students

WANG Ting1, ZHI Fengying2, LU Yutong1, ZHANG Jijia1()
1. Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China; The State Ethnic Affairs Commission Key Research Center for Language, Cultural, and Psychology; Key Research Center for National Psychology and Education, the National Education Development Center of the Ministry of Education, Beijing 100872, China
2. School of Education Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
Received:2018-08-08Online:2019-08-21Published:2019-07-24
Contact:ZHANG Jijia E-mail:Zhangjj1955@163.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 音乐训练对认知能力具有广泛的促进效应。本研究结合执行功能的三个成分(抑制控制、工作记忆和认知灵活性), 在我国民族音乐背景下, 匹配实验任务的视觉和听觉形式, 探讨侗歌经验对侗族中学生执行功能的影响。结果表明, 侗歌组被试在抑制能力和刷新能力上显著好于侗族非侗歌组被试和汉族被试, 这一优势在视觉任务中和听觉任务中均存在, 说明侗歌经验产生的认知优势具有跨感觉通道的普遍性。侗歌组被试和侗族非侗歌组被试的转换能力差异不显著。侗族非侗歌组被试的抑制能力和转换能力好于汉族被试, 这体现了语言和音乐的交互作用。


表1被试的基本情况(N = 96)
被试特性 侗歌组(n = 32) 侗族非侗歌组(n = 32) 汉族(n = 32) F2
性别 38% (男), 62% (女) 41% (男), 59% (女) 50% (男), 50% (女) 1.11
年龄 17.34 (0.90) 17.38 (0.55) 17.50 (0.76) 0.39
居住地 94% (乡村) 84% (乡村) 81% (乡村) 2.31
家庭经济地位 7.13 (1.77) 7.84 (2.17) 7.63 (2.34) 0.98
MBEA音乐能力 26.31 (1.97) 24.04 (2.08) 23.00 (2.50) 20.80**
母语熟练程度 4.18 (0.57) 4.16 (0.85) 4.22 (0.79) 0.08
母语使用频率 4.25 (0.67) 4.13 (0.87) 4.56 (0.91) 2.39
侗族汉语熟练程度 3.63 (0.55) 3.78 (0.79) 0.91
侗族汉语使用频率 4.13 (0.79) 4.28 (0.73) 0.82

表1被试的基本情况(N = 96)
被试特性 侗歌组(n = 32) 侗族非侗歌组(n = 32) 汉族(n = 32) F2
性别 38% (男), 62% (女) 41% (男), 59% (女) 50% (男), 50% (女) 1.11
年龄 17.34 (0.90) 17.38 (0.55) 17.50 (0.76) 0.39
居住地 94% (乡村) 84% (乡村) 81% (乡村) 2.31
家庭经济地位 7.13 (1.77) 7.84 (2.17) 7.63 (2.34) 0.98
MBEA音乐能力 26.31 (1.97) 24.04 (2.08) 23.00 (2.50) 20.80**
母语熟练程度 4.18 (0.57) 4.16 (0.85) 4.22 (0.79) 0.08
母语使用频率 4.25 (0.67) 4.13 (0.87) 4.56 (0.91) 2.39
侗族汉语熟练程度 3.63 (0.55) 3.78 (0.79) 0.91
侗族汉语使用频率 4.13 (0.79) 4.28 (0.73) 0.82


表2听觉抑制任务的平均反应时(ms)和平均正确率(%)
被试类型 反应 实验条件 Stroop效应量
语义与音高一致 语义与音高冲突
侗歌组
(n = 32)
反应时 609 (107) 631 (109) 22 (32)
正确率 96.48 (3.32) 93.48 (4.62) 3.00 (4.74)
侗族非侗歌组
(n = 32)
反应时 635 (85) 689 (98) 54 (39)
正确率 96.45 (4.07) 93.08 (5.14) 3.38 (6.00)
汉族
(n = 32)
反应时 640 (84) 709 (74) 69 (33)
正确率 91.17 (10.53) 89.00 (11.52) 2.17 (8.24)

表2听觉抑制任务的平均反应时(ms)和平均正确率(%)
被试类型 反应 实验条件 Stroop效应量
语义与音高一致 语义与音高冲突
侗歌组
(n = 32)
反应时 609 (107) 631 (109) 22 (32)
正确率 96.48 (3.32) 93.48 (4.62) 3.00 (4.74)
侗族非侗歌组
(n = 32)
反应时 635 (85) 689 (98) 54 (39)
正确率 96.45 (4.07) 93.08 (5.14) 3.38 (6.00)
汉族
(n = 32)
反应时 640 (84) 709 (74) 69 (33)
正确率 91.17 (10.53) 89.00 (11.52) 2.17 (8.24)



图1被试在听觉任务和视觉任务下的抑制效应量
图1被试在听觉任务和视觉任务下的抑制效应量


表3视觉抑制任务的平均反应时(ms)和平均正确率(%)
被试类型 反应 实验条件 Stroop效应量
箭头指向与位置一致 箭头指向与位置冲突
侗歌组
(n = 32)
反应时 430 (50) 459 (55) 28 (20)
正确率 99.31 (1.20) 96.50 (4.62) 2.81 (4.76)
侗族非侗歌组
(n = 32)
反应时 437 (50) 479 (54) 43 (26)
正确率 98.84 (2.84) 96.38 (5.14) 2.47 (4.24)
汉族
(n = 32)
反应时 434 (40) 490 (50) 55 (22)
正确率 96.78 (6.46) 95.84 (5.05) 0.94 (4.45)

表3视觉抑制任务的平均反应时(ms)和平均正确率(%)
被试类型 反应 实验条件 Stroop效应量
箭头指向与位置一致 箭头指向与位置冲突
侗歌组
(n = 32)
反应时 430 (50) 459 (55) 28 (20)
正确率 99.31 (1.20) 96.50 (4.62) 2.81 (4.76)
侗族非侗歌组
(n = 32)
反应时 437 (50) 479 (54) 43 (26)
正确率 98.84 (2.84) 96.38 (5.14) 2.47 (4.24)
汉族
(n = 32)
反应时 434 (40) 490 (50) 55 (22)
正确率 96.78 (6.46) 95.84 (5.05) 0.94 (4.45)


表4被试在听觉刷新任务中的平均正确率(%)
被试类型 记忆负荷水平 均值
1back 2back 3back
侗歌组 (n = 32) 85.66 (6.60) 72.62 (9.96) 65.94 (9.38) 74.7 (1.6)
侗族非侗歌组 (n = 32) 77.75 (16.05) 64.16 (13.59) 58.53 (9.29) 66.8 (1.6)
汉族 (n = 32) 74.63 (14.52) 63.97 (10.25) 54.00 (9.32) 64.2 (1.6)

表4被试在听觉刷新任务中的平均正确率(%)
被试类型 记忆负荷水平 均值
1back 2back 3back
侗歌组 (n = 32) 85.66 (6.60) 72.62 (9.96) 65.94 (9.38) 74.7 (1.6)
侗族非侗歌组 (n = 32) 77.75 (16.05) 64.16 (13.59) 58.53 (9.29) 66.8 (1.6)
汉族 (n = 32) 74.63 (14.52) 63.97 (10.25) 54.00 (9.32) 64.2 (1.6)



图2被试在听觉任务和视觉任务下的记忆刷新正确率
图2被试在听觉任务和视觉任务下的记忆刷新正确率


表5被试在视觉刷新任务中的平均正确率(%)
被试类型 记忆负荷水平 均值
1back 2back 3back
侗歌组 (n = 32) 91.62 (6.01) 85.19 (8.94) 73.53 (8.29) 83.4 (1.9)
侗族非侗歌组 (n = 32) 86.47 (14.89) 77.59 (12.14) 65.91 (12.50) 76.7 (1.9)
汉族 (n = 32) 85.56 (12.90) 75.81 (14.64) 65.63 (13.27) 75.7 (1.9)

表5被试在视觉刷新任务中的平均正确率(%)
被试类型 记忆负荷水平 均值
1back 2back 3back
侗歌组 (n = 32) 91.62 (6.01) 85.19 (8.94) 73.53 (8.29) 83.4 (1.9)
侗族非侗歌组 (n = 32) 86.47 (14.89) 77.59 (12.14) 65.91 (12.50) 76.7 (1.9)
汉族 (n = 32) 85.56 (12.90) 75.81 (14.64) 65.63 (13.27) 75.7 (1.9)


表6听觉转换任务的平均反应时(ms)和平均正确率(%)
被试类型 反应 实验条件 转换效应
非转换条件 转换条件
侗歌组
(n = 32)
反应时 1066 (243) 1203 (337) 137 (144)
正确率 76.06 (8.66) 73.13 (7.98) 2.94 (3.65)
侗族非侗歌组
(n = 32)
反应时 1089 (219) 1277 (336) 188 (157)
正确率 75.37 (11.83) 72.06 (12.27) 3.31 (5.87)
汉族
(n = 32)
反应时 1093 (200) 1346 (328) 252 (143)
正确率 69.53 (14.94) 68.38 (14.00) 1.16 (4.99)

表6听觉转换任务的平均反应时(ms)和平均正确率(%)
被试类型 反应 实验条件 转换效应
非转换条件 转换条件
侗歌组
(n = 32)
反应时 1066 (243) 1203 (337) 137 (144)
正确率 76.06 (8.66) 73.13 (7.98) 2.94 (3.65)
侗族非侗歌组
(n = 32)
反应时 1089 (219) 1277 (336) 188 (157)
正确率 75.37 (11.83) 72.06 (12.27) 3.31 (5.87)
汉族
(n = 32)
反应时 1093 (200) 1346 (328) 252 (143)
正确率 69.53 (14.94) 68.38 (14.00) 1.16 (4.99)



图3被试在听觉任务和视觉任务下的转换代价
图3被试在听觉任务和视觉任务下的转换代价


表7视觉转换任务的平均反应时(ms)和平均正确率(%)
被试类型 反应 实验条件 转换效应
重复条件 转换条件
侗歌组
(n = 32)
反应时 957 (151) 1322 (178) 365 (155)
正确率 94.44 (8.04) 92.47 (8.12) 1.98 (4.31)
侗族非侗歌组
(n = 32)
反应时 962 (249) 1329 (299) 367 (185)
正确率 91.38 (8.90) 89.34 (9.61) 2.03 (4.58)
汉族
(n = 32)
反应时 988 (248) 1451 (270) 463 (192)
正确率 90.06 (13.41) 85.50 (13.14) 4.56 (2.85)

表7视觉转换任务的平均反应时(ms)和平均正确率(%)
被试类型 反应 实验条件 转换效应
重复条件 转换条件
侗歌组
(n = 32)
反应时 957 (151) 1322 (178) 365 (155)
正确率 94.44 (8.04) 92.47 (8.12) 1.98 (4.31)
侗族非侗歌组
(n = 32)
反应时 962 (249) 1329 (299) 367 (185)
正确率 91.38 (8.90) 89.34 (9.61) 2.03 (4.58)
汉族
(n = 32)
反应时 988 (248) 1451 (270) 463 (192)
正确率 90.06 (13.41) 85.50 (13.14) 4.56 (2.85)







1 Amer T., Kalender B., Hasher L., Trehub S. E., & Wong Y . ( 2013). Do older professional musicians have cognitive advantages? Plos One, ( 8), e71630.
2 Baddeley A. . ( 2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences.4( 11), 417-423.
3 Bent T., Bradlow A. R., & Wright B. A . ( 2006). The influence of linguistic experience on the cognitive processing of pitch in speech and nonspeech sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.32( 1), 97-103
4 Bialystok E., &DePape A. ( 2009). Musical expertise, bilingualism, and executive functioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.35( 2), 565-574.
5 Bidelman G. M., Hutka S., & Moreno S . ( 2013). Tone language speakers and musicians share enhanced perceptual and cognitive abilities for musical pitch: Evidence for bidirectionality between the domains of language and music. Plos One.8( 4), e60676.
6 Bugos J. A., Perlstein W. M., McCrae C. S., Brophy T. S., & Bedenbaugh P. H . ( 2007). Individualized piano instruction enhances executive functioning and working memory in older adults. Aging & Mental Health.11( 4), 464-471
7 Carey D., Rosen S., Krishnan S., Pearce M. T., Shepherd A., Aydelott J., & Dick F . ( 2015). Generality and specificity in the effects of musical expertise on perception and cognition. Cognition.137, 81-105.
8 Chandrasekaran B., Krishnan A., & Gandour J. T . ( 2009). Relative influence of musical and linguistic experience on early cortical processing of pitch contours. Brain and Language.108( 1), 1-9.
9 Chen J., Liu L., Wang R., & Shen H. Z . ( 2017). The effect of musical training on executive functions. Advances in Psychological Science.25( 11), 1854-1864.
10 [ 陈杰, 刘雷, 王蓉, 沈海洲 . ( 2017). 音乐训练对执行功能的影响. 心理科学进展.25( 11), 1854-1864.]
11 Davidson M. C., Amso D., Cruess Anderson L., & Diamond A . ( 2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia.44( 11), 2037-2078.
12 Degé F., Kubicek C., & Schwarzer G . ( 2011). Music lessons and intelligence: A relation mediated by executive functions. Music Perception.29( 2), 195-201.
13 Degé F., Wehrum S., Stark R., & Schwarzer G . ( 2011). The influence of two years of school music training in secondary school on visual and auditory memory. European Journal of Developmental Psychology.8( 5), 608-623.
14 Deng J., &Deng G-H. ( 2014). Inheritance, survival and development: The cultural transformation of Dong minority big song and its "sustainable development". Journal of Guizhou University (Social Science Edition).32( 6), 115-121.
15 [ 邓钧, 邓光华 . ( 2014). 传承, 生存, 发展——论侗族大歌文化转型及其“可持续发展”. 贵州大学学报(社会科学版).32( 6), 115-121.]
16 Diamond A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology.64, 135-168.
17 Diamond A., &Lee K. , ( 2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science.333( 6045), 959-964.
18 Drake C., &Palmer C. ( 2000). Skill acquisition in music performance: relations between planning and temporal control. Cognition.74, 1-32.
19 D'Souza A. A., Moradzadeh L., & Wiseheart M . ( 2018). Musical training, bilingualism, and executive function: Working memory and inhibitory control. Cognitive Research Principles & Implications.3, 11.
20 Du C.C . ( 2009). Dong minority big song: The harmonious voice of livelihood and cultural mode. Journal of Leshan Teachers College.24( 2), 118-121.
21 [ 杜成材 . ( 2009). 侗族大歌:生计方式与文化模式的和谐之音. 乐山师范学院学报.24( 2), 118-121.]
22 Fei X.T . ( 1995). The experience that learns culture theory from teacher Malinowski. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences),( 6), 53-71.
23 [ 费孝通 . ( 1995). 从马诺斯基老师学习文化论的体会. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版).( 6), 53-71.]
24 Frankenberg E., Fries K., Friedrich E. K., Roden I., Kreutz G., & Bongard S . ( 2016). The influence of musical training on acculturation processes in migrant children. Psychology of Music.44( 1), 114-128.
25 Geng Y. (2012). Explore the polyphonic parts of Dong minority big song. Grand Stage, ( 7), 37-38.
26 [ 耿耘 . ( 2012). 侗族大歌多声部探究. 大舞台.( 7), 37-38.]
27 George E.M., &Coch D. , ( 2011). Music training and working memory: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia.49( 5), 1083-1094.
28 Gibson C., Folley B. S., & Park S . ( 2009). Enhanced divergent thinking and creativity in musicians: A behavioral and near-infrared spectroscopy study. Brain and Cognition.69( 1), 162-169.
29 Guan J.H . ( 2014). Differences between the eastern and western music civilizations. Music Art (Journal of Shanghai Music College), ( 1), 80-92.
30 [ 管建华 . ( 2014). 东西方音乐的差异性与文明对话. 音乐艺术(上海音乐学院学报).( 1), 80-92.]
31 Hampshire A., &Sharp D.J, . ( 2015). Contrasting network and modular perspectives on inhibitory control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.19( 8), 445-452.
32 Han M.K., &lv J. ,( 2013). Music training can improve the executive function of children's frontal lobe. China Journal of Health Psychology.21( 4), 542-545.
33 [ 韩明鲲, 吕静 . ( 2013). 音乐训练对改善儿童前额叶执行功能的作用. 中国健康心理学杂志.21( 4), 542-545.]
34 Hanna-Pladdy B., & MacKay A., ( 2011). The relation between instrumental musical activity and cognitive aging. Neuropsychology.25( 3), 378-386.
35 Hodges D. A., Hairston W. D., & Burdette J. H . ( 2005). Aspects of multisensory perception: The integration of visual and auditory information in musical experiences. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.1060, 175-185.
36 , Hou J.C., &Dong Q. , ( 2010). Music cognition: Research results of brain and cognitive science and educational implications. Huangzhong (Journal of Wuhan Conservatory of Music),( 2), 166-173.
37 [ 侯建成, 董奇 . ( 2010). 音乐认知:脑与认知科学的研究成果及其教育启示. 黄钟(武汉音乐学院学报).( 2), 166-173.]
38 Hu. Y.J., & Wang. K . ( 2009). The pilot study of montreal battery of evaluation of amusia a in China. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology.17( 4), 446-448.
39 [ 胡雅娟, 汪凯 . ( 2009). 蒙特利尔音乐测试在中国的试用研究. 中国临床心理学杂志.17( 4), 446-448.]
40 Huang Y.B . ( 2017). A comparative study on polyphonic folk songs of north and south minorities (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ningxia University.
41 [ 黄一柏 . ( 2017). 南北少数民族多声部民歌之比较研究(硕士学位论文), 宁夏大学.]
42 Iwaki T., Hayashi M., & Hori T . ( 1997). Changes in alpha band EEG activity in the frontal area after stimulation with music of different affective content. Perceptual and Motor Skills.84( 2), 515-526.
43 Jentzsch I., Mkrtchian A., & Kansal N . ( 2014). Improved effectiveness of performance monitoring in amateur instrumental musicians. Neuropsychologia.52( 100), 117-124.
44 Jiang C., Hamm J. P., Lim V. K., Kirk I. J., & Yang Y . ( 2010). Processing melodic contour and speech intonation in congenital amusics with Mandarin Chinese. Neuropsychologia.48( 9), 2630-2639.
45 Juslin, P. N . ( 2013). From everyday emotions to aesthetic emotions: Towards a unified theory of musical emotions. Physics of Life Reviews.10( 3), 235-266.
46 Krishnan A., Gandour J. T., & Bidelman G. M . ( 2010). The effects of tone language experience on pitch processing in the brainstem. Journal of Neurolinguistics.23( 1), 81-95.
47 Lai H., Xu M., Song Y. Y., & Liu J . ( 2014). Distinct and shared neural basis underlying music and language: A perspective from meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica Sinica.46( 3), 285-297.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00285
48 [ 赖寒, 徐苗, 宋宜颖, 刘嘉 . ( 2014). 音乐和语言神经基础的重合与分离——基于脑成像研究元分析的比较. 心理学报.46( 3), 285-297.]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00285URL
49 Lee H., &Noppeney U. , ( 2011). Long-term music training tunes how the brain temporally binds signals from multiple senses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.108( 51), 1441-1450.
50 Levitin D.J., & Tirovolas, A. K . ( 2009). Current advances in the cognitive neuroscience of music. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.1156, 211-231.
51 Li M.H., & Bai, X. J . ( 2005). Advances in the development of cognitive flexibility in executive function. Psychology Exploration.25( 2), 35-38.
52 [ 李美华, 白学军 . ( 2005). 执行功能中认知灵活性发展的研究进展. 心理学探新.25( 2), 35-38.]
53 Lu Z. Y., Du J. Z., & Liu X. H . ( 2008). The fourth component of the working memory model: The episodic buffer. Journal of Psychological Science.31( 1), 239-241.
54 [ 鲁忠义, 杜建政, 刘学华 . ( 2008). 工作记忆模型的第四个组成部分——情景缓冲器. 心理科学.31( 1), 239-241.]
55 Malinowski B.( 1936/1987). The scientific theory of culture. Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House.
56 [ ( 英)马凌诺斯基 .(1936/1987). 文化论. 北京:华夏出版社.]
57 Meinz E.J., & Hambrick, D. Z . ( 2010). Deliberate practice is necessary but not sufficient to explain individual differences in piano sight-reading skill: The role of working memory capacity. Psychological Science.21( 1), 914-919.
58 Miyake A., Friedman N. P., Emerson M. J., Witzki A. H., Howerter A., & Wager T. D . ( 2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology.41( 1), 49-100.
59 Moradzadeh L., Blumenthal G., & Wiseheart M . ( 2015). Musical training, bilingualism, and executive function: A closer look at task switching and dual-task performance. Cognitive Science.39( 5), 992-1020.
60 Moreno S., Bialystok E., Barac R., Schellenberg E. G., Cepeda N. J., & Chau T . ( 2011). Short-term music training enhances verbal intelligence and executive function. Psychological Science.22( 11), 1425-1433.
61 Moreno S., &Farzan F. , ( 2015). Music training and inhibitory control: a multidimensional model. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.1337, 147-152.
62 Moreno S., Wodniecka Z., Tays W., Alain C., & Bialystok E . ( 2014). Inhibitory control in bilinguals and musicians: event related potential (ERP) evidence for experience-specific effects. Plos One.9, e94169.
63 Nan Y., Sun Y., & Peretz I . ( 2010). Congenital amusia in speakers of a tone language: Association with lexical tone agnosia. Brain.133( 9), 2635-2642.
64 Oechslin M. S., van de Ville D., Lazeyras F., Hauert C-A., & James C. E . ( 2013). Degree of musical expertise modulates higher order brain functioning. Cerebral Cortex.23( 9), 2213-2224.
65 Okada B.M., & Slevc, L. R .( 2018). Individual differences in musical training and executive functions: A latent variable approach. Memory & Cognition.46( 7), 1076-1092.
66 Pallesen K. J., Brattico E., Bailey C. J., Korvenoja A., Koivisto J., Gjedde A., & Carlson S . ( 2010). Cognitive control in auditory working memory is enhanced in musicians. Plos One.5( 6), e11120.
67 Palmer C., &Pfordresher P.Q . ( 2003). Incremental planning in sequence production. Psychological Review.110( 4), 683-712.
68 Pan Y.H . ( 2012). The morphological characteristics and thinking foundation of music in Dong minority big song(Unpublished master’s thesis), Central Conservatory of Music .
69 [ 潘永华 . ( 2012). 论侗族大歌音乐形态特征及其形成的思维基础(硕士学位论文).中央音乐学院.]
70 Peng G., Zheng H-Y., Gong T., Yang R-X., Kong J-P., & Wang W. S-Y . (2010). The influence of language experience on categorical perception of pitch contours. Journal of Phonetics.38( 4), 616-624.
doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.09.003
71 , , Peretz I., &Coltheart M. , ( 2003). Modularity of music processing. Nature Neuroscience.6, 688-691.
72 Pfordresher P.Q., &Brown S. , ( 2009). Enhanced production and perception of musical pitch in tone language speakers. Attention Perception & Psychophysics.71( 6), 1385-1398.
73 Roden I., Grube D., Bongard S., & Kreutz G . ( 2014). Does music training enhance working memory performance? Findings from a quasi-experimental longitudinal study. Psychology of Music.42( 2), 284-298.
74 Roden I., Zepf F. D., Kreutz G., Grube D., & Bongard S . ( 2016). Effects of music and natural science training on aggressive behavior. Learning and Instruction.45, 85-92.
75 Rogers R.D., &Monsell S. , ( 1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General.124( 2), 207-231.
76 Schellenberg E.G . ( 2011). Examining the association between music lessons and intelligence. British Journal of Psychology.102( 3), 283-302.
77 Schellenberg E. G., Corrigall K. A., Dys S. P., & Malti T . ( 2015). Group music training and children's prosocial skills. Plos One.10( 10), e0141449.
78 Schellenberg E. G., Stalinski S. M., & Marks B. M . ( 2014). Memory for surface features of unfamiliar melodies: Independent effects of changes in pitch and tempo. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung.78( 1), 84-95.
79 Schellenberg E.G., &Moreno S. , ( 2010). Music lessons, pitch processing, and g. Psychology of Music.38( 2), 209-221.
80 Seinfeld S., Figueroa H., Ortiz-Gil J., and Sanchez-Vives M. V . ( 2013). Effects of music learning and piano practice on cognitive function, mood and quality of life in older adults. Frontiers in Psychology,( 4), 810.
81 Slevc L. R., Davey N. S., Buschkuehl M., & Jaeggi S. M . ( 2016). Tuning the mind: Exploring the connections between musical ability and executive functions. Cognition.152, 199-211.
82 Shen Z.L., &Howard G. , ( 2007). The current situation and future of the theory of multiple intelligences in China. Global Education, ( 1), 3-7.
83 [ 沈致隆 霍华德·加德纳 . ( 2007). 多元智能理论在中国与世界的现状和未来. 全球教育展望.( 1), 3-7.]
84 Steinbeis N. &Koelsch S. , ( 2011). Affective priming effects of musical sounds on the processing of word meaning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.23( 3), 604-621.
85 Travis F., Harung H. S., & Lagrosen Y . ( 2011). Moral development, executive functioning, peak experiences and brain patterns in professional and amateur classical musicians: Interpreted in light of a Unified Theory of Performance. Consciousness and Cognition.20( 4), 1256-1264.
86 Vuust P., Wallentin M., Mouridsen K., Ostergaard L., & Roepstorff A . ( 2011). Tapping polyrhythms in music activates language areas. Neuroscience letters.494( 3), 211-216.
87 Wang X., Ossher L., & Reuter-Lorenz P. A . ( 2015). Examining the relationship between skilled music training and attention. Consciousness and Cognition.36, 169-179.
88 Wang T., Wang D., Zhang J. J., & Cui J. A . ( 2017). Effects of “each speaks their own dialect” phenomenon on the executive function of Jingpo students. Acta Psychologica Sinica.49( 11), 1392-1403.
89 [ 王婷, 王丹, 张积家, 崔健爱 . ( 2017). “各说各话”的语言经验对景颇族大学生执行功能的影响. 心理学报.49( 11), 1392-1403.]
90 Whorf B.L ( 1956). Language, thought, andreality:Selectedwritingof Benjamin Lee Whorf.NewYork: Wiley.
91 Yang L.Y . ( 2011). Simply talking about the main theory of functionalism school. Journal of the Party School of CPC Zhengzhou Municipal Committee,( 1), 31-33.
92 [ 杨璐瑶 . ( 2011). 试述功能主义学派的主要理论. 中共郑州市委党校学报.( 1), 31-33.]
93 Yang X. M., Qi Y. L., Shen Z. F., Han B. X., &Meng B . ( 2015). The influence of family socio-economic status and occupational values on subjective well-being of medical students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology.23( 1), 154-158.
94 [ 杨秀木, 齐玉龙, 申正付, 韩布新, 孟贝 . ( 2015). 家庭社会经济地位、职业价值观对医学生主观幸福感的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志.23( 1), 154-158.]
95 Yang Y. ( 2014). The unique artistic charm of Dong minority big song. Social Sciences in Guizhou, 8, 152-156.
96 [ 杨毅 . ( 2014). 侗族大歌的独特艺术魅力. 贵州社会科学. 8, 152-156.]
97 Zhang G.H . ( 2004). The singing characteristics and formal beauty of Dong minority big song. Chinese Music.3, 106-108.
98 [ 张贵华 . ( 2004). 侗族大歌的演唱特点及其形式美特征. 中国音乐.3, 106-108.]
99 Zhang J. J., Liu L. H., & Tan L. H . ( 2005). The hypothesis of linguistic reality: New evidence and view. Linguistic Science.4( 3), 42-56.
100 [ 张积家, 刘丽虹, 谭力海 . ( 2005). 语言关联性假设的研究进展——新的证据与看法. 语言科学.4( 3), 42-56.]
101 Zhang W.D . ( 2014). Music, psychology and brain. Journal of East China Normal University (Education Science Edition).32( 1), 89-96.
102 [ 张卫东 . ( 2014). 音乐、心理与大脑. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版).32( 1), 89-96.]
103 Zhang X.J., &Yang. Y . ( 2013). Analysis on the cognitive basis of polyglot chorus form in Dong minority big song. Nationalities Forum, ( 11), 95-98.
104 [ 张新杰, 杨瑛 . ( 2013). 侗族大歌多声部合唱形式的认知基础分析. 民族论坛.( 11), 95-98.]
105 Zuk. J.., Benjamin C., Kenyon A., Gaab N . ( 2015). Correction: Behavioral and neural correlates of executive functioning in musicians and non-musicians. Plos One.10( 9), e0137930.




[1]盖笑松, 许洁, 闫艳, 王元, 谢笑春. 体感游戏促进儿童的执行功能:运动强度和认知参与的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 505-514.
[2]赵鑫, 李红利, 金戈, 李世峰, 周爱保, 梁文佳, 郭红霞, 蔡亚亚. 语音记忆和中央执行功能在不同年级儿童解码和语言理解中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(4): 469-484.
[3]王元, 李柯, 盖笑松, 曹逸飞. 基于即时反馈的反应抑制训练对青少年和成人执行功能的训练效应和迁移效应[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(10): 1212-1223.
[4]李泉, 宋亚男, 廉彬, 冯廷勇. 正念训练提升3~4岁幼儿注意力和执行功能[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(3): 324-336.
[5]邢淑芬, 李倩倩, 高鑫, 马园园, 傅锐. 不同睡眠时间参数对学前儿童执行功能的差异化影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(11): 1269-1281.
[6]邢强, 孙海龙, 占丹玲, 胡婧, 刘凯. 执行功能对言语顿悟问题解决的影响: 基于行为与ERPs的研究[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(7): 909-919.
[7]杨海波;赵欣;汪洋;张磊;王瑞萌; 张毅;王力. PTSD青少年执行功能缺陷的情绪特异性[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(5): 643-652.
[8]王婷, 王丹, 张积家, 崔健爱. “各说各话”的语言经验 对景颇族大学生执行功能的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(11): 1392-1403.
[9]陈爱国,殷恒婵,颜军,杨钰. 不同强度短时有氧运动对执行功能的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(09): 1055-1062.
[10]吴文婕, 张莉,冯廷勇,李红. 热执行功能对儿童标准窗口任务测试的影响 [J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(03): 319-326.
[11]李一员,吴睿明,胡兴旺,李红,P ,D ,Zelaz. 聋童执行功能发展:聋童与正常儿童的比较
[J]. 心理学报, 2006, 38(03): 356-364.
[12]廖渝,吴睿明,Philip ,David ,Zelazo,李红,张婷,张莉,高山,李小晶. 意外地点任务中不同测试问题及意图理解与执行功能的关系[J]. 心理学报, 2006, 38(02): 207-215.
[13]张婷,吴睿明,李红,Philip ,David ,Zelazo,张莉,廖渝,李小晶
. 不同维度的执行功能与早期心理理论的关系[J]. 心理学报, 2006, 38(01): 56-62.
[14]魏勇刚,吴睿明,李红,冯廷勇,Philip David Zelazo. 抑制性控制在幼儿执行功能与心理理论中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2005, 37(05): 598-605.
[15]陈天勇,李德明. 执行功能可分离性及与年龄关系的潜变量分析[J]. 心理学报, 2005, 37(02): 210-217.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4514
相关话题/心理 视觉 音乐 语言 实验