删除或更新信息，请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

EMMN受偏差-标准刺激对类型和情绪类型影响: 来自元分析的证据

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01
曾宪卿, 许冰, 孙博, 叶健彤, 傅世敏()
广州大学教育学院心理系/脑与认知科学中心, 广州 510006
收稿日期:2020-09-29出版日期:2021-07-15发布日期:2021-05-24
通讯作者:傅世敏E-mail:fusm@gzhu.edu.cn

基金资助:国家自然科学基金资助项目(31970993)

EMMN varies with deviant-standard stimulus pair type and emotion type: Evidence from a meta-analysis study

ZENG Xianqing, XU Bing, SUN Bo, YE Jiantong, FU Shimin()
Department of Psychology and Center for Brain and Cognitive Sciences, School of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Received:2020-09-29Online:2021-07-15Published:2021-05-24
Contact:FU Shimin E-mail:fusm@gzhu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要： 自动探测面孔情绪的变化对个体生存是十分重要的。许多采用事件相关电位(ERP)技术的研究表明情绪失匹配负波(EMMN)可以作为检测面孔情绪自动加工的指标。前人的研究表明偏差-标准刺激对(不同/相同)和情绪类型(消极/积极)影响了EMMN效应, 但是结论存在争议。本研究对35项以EMMN为指标的研究(共721名被试)进行元分析, 结果表明: (1)在早期(0~200 ms)和晚期(200~400 ms)都发现了显著的EMMN效应, 偶然呈现的情绪性面孔在两个时间窗内诱发更负的ERP, 表明EMMN反映了面孔情绪相关的早期和晚期ERP成分的概率效应; (2)偏差-标准刺激对类型影响了早期而不是晚期EMMN效应: 在早期区间内, 不同的偏差-标准刺激对诱发了更大的EMMN; (3)在相同偏差-标准刺激对的研究中, 等概率和非等概率的EMMN效应在两个时间窗内都没有显著差异; (4)早期和晚期EMMN都具有消极偏向, 即, 消极情绪诱发的EMMN显著大于积极情绪诱发的EMMN。这些结果表明, EMMN效应受到偏差-标准刺激对和情绪类型等实验变量的影响。


表1纳入分析的研究的信息

表1纳入分析的研究的信息



图1文献筛选流程
图1文献筛选流程



图2森林图: 早期EMMN和晚期EMMN的效应量和时间窗。 情绪类型: 愤怒(A), 恐惧(F), 快乐(H), 伤心(S), 中性(N), 消极(Ne), 积极(Po)
图2森林图: 早期EMMN和晚期EMMN的效应量和时间窗。 情绪类型: 愤怒(A), 恐惧(F), 快乐(H), 伤心(S), 中性(N), 消极(Ne), 积极(Po)



图3森林图: 早期EMMN和晚期EMMN的消极偏向效应量和时间窗。 情绪类型: 愤怒(A), 恐惧(F), 快乐(H), 伤心(S), 消极(Ne), 积极(Po)
图3森林图: 早期EMMN和晚期EMMN的消极偏向效应量和时间窗。 情绪类型: 愤怒(A), 恐惧(F), 快乐(H), 伤心(S), 消极(Ne), 积极(Po)







(带*的文献表示纳入元分析中的文献)
[1] * 常翼, 许晶, 史娜. (2010). 卡通表情自动加工的失匹配负波研究. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 19(6), 526-528. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2010.06.017.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2010.06.017
[2] 丁小斌, 刘建邑, 王亚鹏, 康铁君, 党宸. (2020). 情绪变化的自动化加工: 来自 EMMN 的启示. 心理科学进展, 28(1), 85-97. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00085.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00085
[3] * 季淑梅, 李围, 刘鹏, 边志杰. (2013). 卡通表情诱发的视觉失匹配负波研究. 生物医学工程学杂志, 30(3), 476-480. doi: CNKI:SUN:SWGC.0.2013-03-006
doi: CNKI:SUN:SWGC.0.2013-03-006
[4] * 贾鸿宁, 常翼, 许晶, 史娜, 庞小梅, 唐迪. (2013). 广泛性焦虑患者面孔表情自动加工的事件相关电位分析. 中华医学杂志, 93(35), 2806-2809. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2013.35.011.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2013.35.011
[5] Amado, C., & Kovacs, G. (2016). Does surprise enhancement or repetition suppression explain visual mismatch negativity? European Journal of Neuroscience, 43(12), 1590-1600. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13263.
doi: 10.1111/ejn.13263URL
[6] * Astikainen, P., Cong, F. Y., Ristaniemi, T., & Hietanen, J. K. (2013). Event-related potentials to unattended changes in facial expressions: Detection of regularity violations or encoding of emotions? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00557.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00557
[7] * Astikainen, P., & Hietanen, J. K. (2009). Event-related potentials to task-irrelevant changes in facial expressions. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 5: 30. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-5-30.
doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-5-30pmid: 19619272
[8] Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Meta-analysis methods based on direction and p-values. In Introduction to meta-analysis (pp. 325- 330): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
[9] Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97-111. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.12.
doi: 10.1002/jrsm.12pmid: 26061376
[10] Carmel, D., & Bentin, S. (2002). Domain specificity versus expertise: Factors influencing distinct processing of faces. Cognition, 83(1), 1-29. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00162-7.
doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00162-7pmid: 11814484
[11] * Chang, Y., Xu, J., Shi, N., Zhang, B. W., & Zhao, L. (2010). Dysfunction of processing task-irrelevant emotional faces in major depressive disorder patients revealed by expression- related visual MMN. Neuroscience Letters, 472(1), 33-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.01.050.
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.01.050URL
[12] * Chen, B., Sun, P., & Fu, S. M. (2020). Consciousness modulates the automatic change detection of masked emotional faces: Evidence from visual mismatch negativity. Neuropsychologia, 144, 107459. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107459.
doi: S0028-3932(20)30130-5pmid: 32251628
[13] * Csukly, G., Stefanics, G., Komlósi, S., Czigler, I., & Czobor, P. (2013). Emotion-related visual mismatch responses in schizophrenia: Impairments and correlations with emotion recognition. Plos One, 8(10). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075444.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075444
[14] Czigler, I., Balazs, L., & Winkler, I. (2002). Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visual changes. Psychophysiology, 39(6), 869-873. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3960869.
doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3960869pmid: 12462515
[15] Czigler, I., & Sulykos, I. (2010). Visual mismatch negativity to irrelevant changes is sensitive to task-relevant changes. Neuropsychologia, 48(5), 1277-1282. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.029.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.029pmid: 20036268
[16] Dong, X. F., Gao, C. J., Guo, C. Y., Li, W., & Cui, L. X. (2020). Time course of attentional bias in social anxiety: The effects of spatial frequencies and individual threats. Psychophysiology, 57(9), e13617. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13617.
doi: 10.1111/psyp.13617
[17] Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455-463. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x.
doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.xpmid: 10877304
[18] Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629-634. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629URL
[19] Eimer, M., & Holmes, A. (2007). Event-related brain potential correlates of emotional face processing. Neuropsychologia, 45(1), 15-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.022.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.022URL
[20] Fu, S. M., Fan, S. L., & Chen, L. (2003). Event-related potentials reveal involuntary processing of orientation changes in the visual modality. Psychophysiology, 40(5), 770-775. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.00077.
doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.00077URL
[21] * Guo, Y. L., Chen, J., Hou, X. Y., Xu, S., Ma, Y. J., Nie, S. J., ... Liu, X. P. (2020). Pre-attentive dysfunction of processing emotional faces in interictal migraine revealed by expression-related visual mismatch negativity. Brain Research, 1738, 146816. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146816.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146816URL
[22] Hahn, S. (2017). Emotion and attention: When the heart's eye guides the mind's eye. Journal of Cognitive Science, 18(2), 103-115. doi: 10.17791/jcs.2017.18.2.103.
doi: 10.17791/jcs.2017.18.2.103URL
[23] Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557-560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557URL
[24] Hinojosa, J. A., Mercado, F., & Carretié, L. (2015). N170 sensitivity to facial expression: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 55, 498-509. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.002.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.002URL
[25] Ito, T. A., Larsen, J. T., Smith, N. K., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75(4), 887-900. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.887.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.887
[26] Jennions, M. D., & Moller, A. P. (2003). A survey of the statistical power of research in behavioral ecology and animal behavior. Behavioral Ecology, 14(3), 438-445. doi: 10.1093/beheco/14.3.438.
doi: 10.1093/beheco/14.3.438URL
[27] Jiang, Y. P., Wu, X., Saab, R., Xiao, Y., & Gao, X. R. (2018). Time course of influence on the allocation of attentional resources caused by unconscious fearful faces. Neuropsychologia, 113, 104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.001.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.001URL
[28] Kecskés-Kovács, K., Sulykos, I., & Czigler, I. (2013). Is it a face of a woman or a man? Visual mismatch negativity is sensitive to gender category. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00532.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00532
[29] Kimura, M. (2012). Visual mismatch negativity and unintentional temporal-context-based prediction in vision. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 144-155. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.11.010.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.11.010URL
[30] Kimura, M., Katayama, J., Ohira, H., & Schröger, E. (2009). Visual mismatch negativity: New evidence from the equiprobable paradigm. Psychophysiology, 46(2), 402-409. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00767.x.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00767.xURL
[31] * Kimura, M., Kondo, H., Ohira, H., & Schröger, E. (2012). Unintentional temporal context-based prediction of emotional faces: An electrophysiological study. Cerebral Cortex, 22(8), 1774-1785. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr244.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr244URL
[32] Kimura, M., Schröger, E., & Czigler, I. (2011). Visual mismatch negativity and its importance in visual cognitive sciences. Neuroreport, 22(14), 669-673. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834973ba.
doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834973baURL
[33] * Kovarski, K., Latinus, M., Charpentier, J., Cléry, H., Roux, S., Houy-Durand, E., ... Gomot, M. (2017). Facial expression related vMMN: Disentangling emotional from neutral change detection. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 18. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00018.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00018pmid: 28194102
[34] * Kreegipuu, K., Kuldkepp, N., Sibolt, O., Toom, M., Allik, J., & Näätänen, R. (2013). vMMN for schematic faces: Automatic detection of change in emotional expression. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 714. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00714.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00714pmid: 24191149
[35] Kremláček, J., Kreegipuu, K., Tales, A., Astikainen, P., Põldver, N., Näätänen, R., & Stefanics, G. (2016). Visual mismatch negativity (vMMN): A review and meta-analysis of studies in psychiatric and neurological disorders. Cortex, 80, 76-112. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.03.017.
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.03.017pmid: 27174389
[36] * Kuehne, M., Siwy, I., Zaehle, T., Heinze, H.-J., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2019). Out of focus: Facial feedback manipulation modulates automatic processing of unattended emotional faces. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(11), 1631-1640. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01445.
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01445URL
[37] Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta- analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
[38] * Li, Q., Zhou, S. Y., Zheng, Y., & Liu, X. (2018). Female advantage in automatic change detection of facial expressions during a happy-neutral context: An ERP study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 146. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00146.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00146URL
[39] Li, X. Y., Lu, Y. L., Sun, G., Gao, L., & Zhao, L. (2012). Visual mismatch negativity elicited by facial expressions: New evidence from the equiprobable paradigm. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 8:7. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-8-7.
doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-8-7
[40] * Liu, P., Rigoulot, S., & Pell, M. D. (2015). Cultural differences in on-line sensitivity to emotional voices: Comparing East and West. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 311. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00311.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00311
[41] * Liu, P., Rigoulot, S., & Pell, M. D. (2017). Cultural immersion alters emotion perception: Neurophysiological evidence from Chinese immigrants to Canada. Social Neuroscience, 12(6), 685-700. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1231713.
doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1231713
[42] * Liu, T. R., Xiao, T., Li, X. Y., & Shi, J. R. (2015). Fluid intelligence and automatic neural processes in facial expression perception: An event-related potential study. Plos One, 10(9), e0138199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138199.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138199URL
[43] * Liu, T. R., Xiao, T., & Shi, J. R. (2016). Automatic change detection to facial expressions in adolescents: Evidence from visual mismatch negativity responses. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 462. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00462.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00462
[44] Luo, W. B., Feng, W. F., He, W. Q., Wang, N.-Y., & Luo, Y.-J. (2010). Three stages of facial expression processing: ERP study with rapid serial visual presentation. Neuroimage, 49(2), 1857-1867. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.018.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.018URL
[45] Méndez-Bértolo, C., Moratti, S., Toledano, R., Lopez-Sosa, F., Martínez-Alvarez, R., Mah, Y. H., ... Strange, B. A. (2016). A fast pathway for fear in human amygdala. Nature Neuroscience, 19, 1041-1049. doi: 10.1038/nn.4324.
doi: 10.1038/nn.4324
[46] Mermillod, M., Grynberg, D., Pio-Lopez, L., Rychlowska, M., Beffara, B., Harquel, S., ... Droit-Volet, S. (2018). Evidence of rapid modulation by social information of subjective, physiological, and neural responses to emotional expressions. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 231. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00231.
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00231URL
[47] Pham, B., Platt, R., McAuley, L., Klassen, T. P., & Moher, D. (2001). Is there a "best" way to detect and minimize publication bias? An empirical evaluation. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 24(2), 109-125. doi: 10.1177/016327870102400202.
doi: 10.1177/016327870102400202
[48] Qiu, R. Y., Wang, H. L., & Fu, S. M. (2017). N170 reveals the categorical perception effect of emotional valence. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2056. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02056.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02056
[49] * Rosburg, T., Weigl, M., & Deuring, G. (2019). Enhanced processing of facial emotion for target stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 146, 190-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.08.010.
doi: S0167-8760(19)30474-Xpmid: 31669316
[50] Rosenberg, M. S. (2005). The file-drawer problem revisited: A general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution, 59(2), 464-468. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01004.x.
doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01004.xpmid: 15807430
[51] Schindler, S., & Bublatzky, F. (2020). Attention and emotion: An integrative review of emotional face processing as a function of attention. Cortex, 130, 362-386. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.06.010.
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.06.010URL
[52] Schlüter, H., & Bermeitinger, C. (2017). Emotional oddball: A review on variants, results, and mechanisms. Review of General Psychology, 21(3), 179-222. doi: 10.1037/gpr0000120.
doi: 10.1037/gpr0000120URL
[53] Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1996). Mismatch response of the human brain to changes in sound location. Neuroreport, 7(18), 3005-3008. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199611250-00041.
doi: 10.1097/00001756-199611250-00041pmid: 9116228
[54] * She, S. L., Li, H. J., Ning, Y. P., Ren, J. J., Wu, Z. Y., Huang, R. C., ... Zheng, Y. J. (2017). Revealing the dysfunction of schematic facial-expression processing in schizophrenia: A comparative study of different references. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 11, 314. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00314.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00314URL
[55] Smith, N. K., Cacioppo, J. T., Larsen, J. T., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). May I have your attention, please: Electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli. Neuropsychologia, 41(2),171-183. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00147-1.
doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00147-1pmid: 12459215
[56] * Song, J., Cao, C. L., Yang, M., Yao, S., Yan, Y., Peng, G. B., ... Xu, G. Z. (2018). The dysfunction of processing task-irrelevant emotional faces in pituitary patients: An evidence from expression-related visual mismatch negativity. Neuroreport, 29(4), 328-333. doi: 10.1097/wnr.0000000000000965.
doi: 10.1097/wnr.0000000000000965URL
[57] * Soshi, T., Noda, T., Ando, K., Nakazawa, K., Tsumura, H., & Okada, T. (2015). Neurophysiological modulation of rapid emotional face processing is associated with impulsivity traits. Bmc Neuroscience, 16(1), 87. doi: 10.1186/s12868-015-0223-x.
doi: 10.1186/s12868-015-0223-xURL
[58] * Stefanics, G., Csukly, G., Komlósi, S., Czobor, P., & Czigler, I. (2012). Processing of unattended facial emotions: A visual mismatch negativity study. Neuroimage, 59(3), 3042-3049. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.041.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.041pmid: 22037000
[59] * Stefanics, G., Heinzle, J., Horvath, A. A., & Stephan, K. E. (2018). Visual mismatch and predictive coding: A computational single-trial ERP study. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(16), 4020-4030. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3365-17.2018.
doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3365-17.2018URL
[60] Stefanics, G., Kremláček, J., & Czigler, I. (2014). Visual mismatch negativity: A predictive coding view. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 666. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00666.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00666pmid: 25278859
[61] Sulykos, I., & Czigler, I. (2011). One plus one is less than two: Visual features elicit non-additive mismatch-related brain activity. Brain Research, 1398, 64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.05.009.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.05.009URL
[62] * Susac, A., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Pihko, E., & Supek, S. (2004). Neurodynamic studies on emotional and inverted faces in an oddball paradigm. Brain Topography, 16(4), 265-268. doi: 10.1023/B:BRAT.0000032863.39907.cb.
doi: 10.1023/B:BRAT.0000032863.39907.cbpmid: 15379225
[63] * Susac, A., Ilmoniemi, R. J., & Supek, S. (2010). Sensory- memory-based change detection in face stimuli. Translational Neuroscience, 1(4), 286-291. doi: 10.2478/v10134-010-0042-7.
doi: 10.2478/v10134-010-0042-7
[64] * Tang, D., Xu, J., Chang, Y., Zheng, Y., Shi, N., Pang, X. M., & Zhang, B. W. (2013). Visual mismatch negativity in the detection of facial emotions in patients with panic disorder. Neuroreport, 24(5), 207-211. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835eb63a.
doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835eb63apmid: 23399996
[65] Turano, M. T., Lao, J. P., Richoz, A.-R., de Lissa, P., Degosciu, S. B. A., Viggiano, M. P., & Caldara, R. (2017). Fear boosts the early neural coding of faces. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(12), 1959-1971. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx110.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx110URL
[66] * Vogel, B. O., Shen, C., & Neuhaus, A. H. (2015). Emotional context facilitates cortical prediction error responses. Human Brain Mapping, 36(9), 3641-3652. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22868.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.22868pmid: 26047176
[67] * Vogel, B. O., Stasch, J., Walter, H., & Neuhaus, A. H. (2018). Emotional context restores cortical prediction error responses in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 197, 434-440. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.02.030.
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.02.030URL
[68] * Wang, S., Li, W. H., Lv, B., Chen, X. Y., Liu, Y., & Jiang, Z. Q. (2016). ERP comparison study of face gender and expression processing in unattended condition. Neuroscience Letters, 618, 39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.02.039.
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.02.039URL
[69] Winkler, I., & Czigler, I. (2012). Evidence from auditory and visual event-related potential (ERP) studies of deviance detection (MMN and vMMN) linking predictive coding theories and perceptual object representations. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 132-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.10.001.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.10.001pmid: 22047947
[70] * Wu, Z. Y., Zhong, X. M., Peng, Q., Chen, B., Mai, N. K., & Ning, Y. P. (2017). Negative bias in expression-related mismatch negativity (MMN) in remitted late-life depression: An event-related potential study. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 95, 224-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.08.019.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.08.019URL
[71] * Xu, Q., Yang, Y. P., Wang, P., Sun, G., & Zhao, L. (2013). Gender differences in preattentive processing of facial expressions: An ERP study. Brain Topography, 26(3), 488-500. doi: 10.1007/s10548-013-0275-0.
doi: 10.1007/s10548-013-0275-0URL
[72] * Yin, G. M., She, S. L., Zhao, L., & Zheng, Y. J. (2018). The dysfunction of processing emotional faces in schizophrenia revealed by expression-related visual mismatch negativity. Neuroreport, 29(10), 814-818. doi: 10.1097/wnr.0000000000001037.
doi: 10.1097/wnr.0000000000001037URL
[73] Yuan, J. J., Tian, Y., Huang, X. T., Fan, H. Y., & Wei, X. M. (2019). Emotional bias varies with stimulus type, arousal and task setting: Meta-analytic evidences. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 107, 461-472. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.035.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.035URL
[74] * Zhang, Y., Chen, J., Hou, X. Y., Guo, Y. L., Lv, R. J., Xu, S., ... Liu, X. P. (2020). Dysfunction of processing task- irrelevant emotional faces in primary insomnia patients: An evidence from expression-related visual MMN. Sleep and Breathing. doi: 10.1007/s11325-020-02058-5.
doi: 10.1007/s11325-020-02058-5
[75] * Zhao, L., & Li, J. (2006). Visual mismatch negativity elicited by facial expressions under non-attentional condition. Neuroscience Letters, 410(2), 126-131. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.09.081.
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.09.081URL




[1]张建平, 林澍倩, 刘善仕, 张亚, 李焕荣. 领导授权赋能与领导有效性的关系：基于元分析的检验[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(9): 1576-1598.
[2]张雯, 胡娜, 丁雪辰, 李俊一. 拒绝敏感性与边缘型人格特征的关联：一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1179-1194.
[3]叶静, 张戌凡. 老年人心理韧性与幸福感的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 202-217.
[4]陈钰, 莫李澄, 毕蓉, 张丹丹. 新生儿语音感知的神经基础:元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(8): 1273-1281.
[5]黄崇蓉, 胡瑜. 组织内信任与创造力的关系：元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7): 1118-1132.
[6]张建平, 秦传燕, 刘善仕. 寻求反馈能改善绩效吗?——反馈寻求行为与个体绩效关系的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(4): 549-565.
[7]方俊燕, 张敏强. 元回归中效应量的最小个数需求：基于统计功效和估计精度[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(4): 673-680.
[8]张亚利, 李森, 俞国良. 孤独感和手机成瘾的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(11): 1836-1852.
[9]胥彦, 李超平. 人口统计学特征对公共服务动机有什么影响?来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(10): 1631-1649.
[10]丁凤琴, 王冬霞. 道德概念具身隐喻及其影响因素：来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(9): 1540-1555.
[11]胥彦, 李超平. 领导风格与敬业度关系的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(8): 1363-1383.
[12]辛素飞, 姜文源, 辛自强. 1993至2016年医学生心理健康变迁的横断历史研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1183-1193.
[13]张亚利, 李森, 俞国良. 自尊与社交焦虑的关系：基于中国学生群体的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(6): 1005-1018.
[14]汤明, 李伟强, 刘福会, 袁博. 内疚与亲社会行为的关系：来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(5): 773-788.
[15]邵嵘, 滕召军, 刘衍玲. 暴力视频游戏对个体亲社会性的影响：一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 453-464.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5501
相关话题/心理 科学 文献 流程 概率
  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效，10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材，产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频，无论您是考研复习、考证刷题，还是考前冲刺等，不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    考试优惠券 本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 人们如何设想未来：未来情景思维对个体心理和行为的影响
    卢蕾安,王春生,任俊()浙江师范大学教育与人类发展学院心理系,金华321004收稿日期:2020-07-09出版日期:2021-06-15发布日期:2021-04-25通讯作者:任俊E-mail:drinren@163.com基金资助:国家社会科学基金“十三五”规划教育学一般课题“基于积极心理学理念 ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 姓名对个体心理与行为的实际影响：证据和理论
    包寒吴霜,蔡华俭()中国科学院心理研究所人格与社会心理研究中心,北京100101中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049收稿日期:2020-09-02出版日期:2021-06-15发布日期:2021-04-25通讯作者:蔡华俭E-mail:caihj@psych.ac.cn基金资助:国家社会科学基金 ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 傅斯年的心理学探索及其贡献
    陈彦垒(),胡志坚聊城大学教育科学学院,山东聊城252059收稿日期:2020-08-13出版日期:2021-06-15发布日期:2021-04-25通讯作者:陈彦垒E-mail:chenyanlei@lcu.edu.cn基金资助:聊城市社科规划专项(ZXYB202002019)FuSsu-nien ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 语言经验对概率词切分的影响
    于文勃1,王璐1,程幸悦1,王天琳2,张晶晶3,梁丹丹1()1南京师范大学文学院,南京2100972纽约州立大学奥尔巴尼分校教育学院,纽约122223南京师范大学心理学院,南京210097收稿日期:2020-06-28出版日期:2021-05-15发布日期:2021-03-30通讯作者:梁丹丹E-m ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 基于社交媒体数据的心理指标识别建模: 机器学习的方法
    苏悦1,2,刘明明1,3,赵楠1,刘晓倩1,朱廷劭1,2()1中国科学院心理研究所,北京1001012中国科学院大学心理学系,北京1000493联想研究院,北京100094收稿日期:2020-01-14出版日期:2021-04-15发布日期:2021-02-22基金资助:国家社科基金重点项目(17A ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 基于游戏的心理测评
    徐俊怡,李中权()南京大学社会学院心理学系,南京210023收稿日期:2020-05-24出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯作者:李中权E-mail:zqli@nju.edu.cn基金资助:教育部人文社科规划基金项目(20YJA190004);江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科 ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 恐惧管理理论的争议及其对死亡心理研究的启示
    孟祥寒1,李强1,2(),周彦榜1,王进31南开大学社会心理学系,天津3003502南开大学滨海学院,天津3002703天津职业技术师范大学,天津300222收稿日期:2020-02-29出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯作者:李强E-mail:liqiangp@126 ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 敬畏的心理模型及其认知神经机制
    赵小红1,2,童薇3,陈桃林1,2(),吴冬梅4,张蕾1,2,陈正举1,方晓义3,龚启勇1,2,唐小蓉21四川大学华西医院放射科华西磁共振研究中心,成都6100412四川大学公共管理学院社会学与心理学系,成都6100653北京师范大学心理学部,北京1008754成都市第四人民医院,成都610036收 ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 老年人心理韧性与幸福感的关系:一项元分析
    叶静,张戌凡()南京师范大学金陵女子学院,南京210097收稿日期:2020-07-23出版日期:2021-02-15发布日期:2020-12-29通讯作者:张戌凡E-mail:xufanzhang@163.com基金资助:国家自然科学青年基金项目“工会实践对员工工作幸福感的影响:基于工具-情感的双 ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 催产素调控心理韧性:基于对海马的作用机制
    薛冰,王雪娇,马宁,高军()认知与人格教育部重点实验室,重庆400715收稿日期:2020-04-27出版日期:2021-02-15发布日期:2020-12-29通讯作者:高军E-mail:gaojunscience@126.com基金资助:国家自然科学基金(32071059);重庆市自然科学基金( ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01

Free考研考试FreeKaoYan.Com
欢迎来到Free考研考试，"为实现人生的Free而奋斗"

© 2020 FreeKaoYan! . All rights reserved.