删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

记忆的顿悟优势效应

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

赖燕群1, 杨琪2(), 黄宝珍3, 赛李阳4
1 福建师范大学心理学院, 福州 350108
2 同济大学哲学系, 上海200092
3 宁德师范学院艺术与教育学院, 福建 宁德 352100
4 杭州师范大学心理科学研究院, 杭州 311121
收稿日期:2018-12-12出版日期:2019-12-15发布日期:2019-10-21
通讯作者:杨琪E-mail:yangqpsy@163.com

基金资助:* 杭州市哲学社会科学规划课题(2018RCZX17);福建省社会科学规划项目(西部扶持项目)(FJ2019X009);宁德师范学院重大项目培育项目(2018ZDS14)

The promoting effect of insight on memory

LAI Yanqun1, YANG Qi2(), HUANG Baozhen3, SAI Liyang4
1 School of Psychology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350108, China
2 Department of Philosophy, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China
3 School of Education and Art, Ningde Normal University, Ningde, 352100, China
4 Institute of psychological science, Hangzhou normal university, Hangzhou, 311121, China
Received:2018-12-12Online:2019-12-15Published:2019-10-21
Contact:YANG Qi E-mail:yangqpsy@163.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 记忆的顿悟优势效应指, 与加工非顿悟问题相比, 加工顿悟问题能够产生更优的记忆保持量。该效应在顿悟的两种操作性定义以及不同实验材料中稳定出现。基于顿悟阶段观, 研究者提出两种理论解释记忆的顿悟优势效应的认知机制:认知的生成效应和表征转化理论认为, 顿悟加工过程中的认知努力、适当迁移加工以及顿悟的表征转换加工促进记忆的保持效果; 情绪的“啊哈”体验理论认为, 加工顿悟问题后的情绪对后续的信息提取具有促进作用。未来的研究可从优化顿悟的指标、巩固记忆的顿悟优势效应、评估其持续性以及更加系统探讨记忆的顿悟优势效应的认知机制等四个方面展开。


[1] 黄福荣, 和美, 罗劲 . ( 2017). 组块破解形态顿悟的脑认知机理. 科学通报, 62( 31), 3594-3604.
[2] 罗劲 . ( 2004). 顿悟的大脑机制. 心理学报, 36( 2), 219-234.
[3] 吕凯 . ( 2016). 顿悟问题解决中抑制功能的作用. 心理与行为研究, 14( 2), 219-227.
[4] 买晓琴, 罗劲, 吴建辉, 罗跃嘉 . ( 2005). 猜谜作业中顿悟的ERP效应. 心理学报, 37( 1), 19-25.
[5] 聂其阳, 罗劲 . ( 2012). “啊哈!”和“哈哈!”: 顿悟与幽默的脑认知成分比较. 心理科学进展, 20( 2), 219-227.
[6] 任国防, 邱江, 曹贵康, 张庆林 . ( 2007). 顿悟: 是进程监控还是表征转换. 心理科学, 30( 5), 1265-1268.
[7] 沈汪兵, 刘昌, 罗劲, 余洁 . ( 2012). 顿悟问题思维僵局早期觉察的脑电研究. 心理学报, 44( 7), 924-935.
[8] 沈汪兵, 袁媛, 赵源, 贡喆, 刘昌 . ( 2017). 顿悟体验的特性、结构和功能基础. 心理科学, 40( 2), 347-352.
[9] 吴真真, 邱江, 张庆林 . ( 2008). 顿悟的原型启发效应机制探索. 心理发展与教育, 24( 1), 31-35.
[10] 邢强, 孙海龙, 占丹玲, 胡婧, 刘凯 . ( 2017). 执行功能对言语顿悟问题解决的影响: 基于行为与 ERPs 的研究. 心理学报, 49( 7), 909-919.
[11] 邢强, 张忠炉, 孙海龙, 张金莲, 王菁 . ( 2013). 字谜顿悟任务中限制解除和组块分解的机制及其原型启发效应. 心理学报, 45( 10), 1061-1071.
[12] 袁媛, 沈汪兵, 施春华, 刘畅, 刘取芝, 刘昌 . ( 2016). 顿悟体验的心理与神经机制. 心理科学进展, 24( 9), 1329-1338.
[13] 张庆林, 邱江 . ( 2005). 顿悟与源事件中启发信息的激活. 心理科学, 28( 1), 6-9.
[14] 张庆林, 邱江, 曹贵康 . ( 2004). 顿悟认知机制的研究述评与理论构想. 心理科学, 27( 6), 1435-1437.
[15] Ash, I. K., & Wiley, J. (2006). The nature of restructuring in insight: An individual-differences approach. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13( 1), 66-73.
[16] Auble, P. M., Franks, J. J., & Soraci, S. A . ( 1979). Effort toward comprehension: Elaboration or “aha!”? Memory & Cognition, 7( 6), 426-434.
[17] Beeftink, F., van Eerde, W., & Rutte, C. G . ( 2008). The effect of interruptions and breaks on insight and impasses: Do you need a break right now? Creativity Research Journal, 20( 4), 358-364.
[18] Bertsch, S., Pesta, B. J., Wiscott, R., & Mcdaniel, M. A . ( 2007). The generation effect: A meta-analytic review. Memory & Cognition, 35( 2), 201-210.
[19] Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003a). Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10( 3), 730-737.
[20] Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003b). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 35( 4), 634-639.
[21] Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2007). Methods for investigating the neural components of insight. Methods, 42( 1), 87-99.
[22] Bowden, E. M., Jung-Beeman, M., Fleck, J., & Kounios, J . ( 2005). New approaches to demystifying insight. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9( 7), 322-328.
[23] Bunzeck, N., Doeller, C. F., Dolan, R. J., & Duzel, E . ( 2012). Contextual interaction between novelty and reward processing within the mesolimbic system. Human Brain Mapping, 33( 6), 1309-1324.
[24] Burns, D. J . ( 1992). The consequences of generation. Journal of Memory & Language, 31( 5), 615-633.
[25] Chein, J. M., & Weisberg, R. W . ( 2014). Working memory and insight in verbal problems: Analysis of compound remote associates. Memory & Cognition, 42( 1), 67-83.
[26] Chermahini, S. A., & Hommel, B. (2010). The (b)link between creativity and dopamine: Spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent thinking. Cognition, 115( 3), 458-465.
[27] Chronicle, E. P., MacGregor, J. N., & Ormerod, T. C . ( 2004). What makes an insight problem? The roles of heuristics, goal conception, and solution recoding in knowledge-lean problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30( 1), 14-27.
[28] Chu, Y., & MacGregor, J. N . ( 2011). Human performance on insight problem solving: A review. The Journal of Problem Solving, 3( 2), 119-150.
[29] Cranford, E. A., & Moss, J. (2012). Is insight always the same? A protocol analysis of insight in compound remote associate problems. The Journal of Problem Solving, 4( 2), 128-153.
[30] Danek, A. H., Fraps, T., von Müller, A., Grothe, B., & Öllinger, M . ( 2013). Aha! experiences leave a mark: Facilitated recall of insight solutions. Psychological Research, 77( 5), 659-669.
[31] Danek, A. H., Fraps, T., von Müller, A., Grothe, B., & Öllinger, M . ( 2014). It's a kind of magic—What self-reports can reveal about the phenomenology of insight problem solving. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1408.
[32] Danek, A. H., & Wiley, J. (2017). What about false insights? Deconstructing the aha! experience along its multiple dimensions for correct and incorrect solutions separately. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2077.
[33] Danek, A. H., Wiley, J., Öllinger, M . ( 2016). Solving classical insight problems without aha! experience: 9 dot, 8 coin, and matchstick arithmetic problems. Journal of Problem Solving, 9( 1), 47-57.
[34] Du, X. M., Zhang, K., Wang, J. L., Luo, J. L., & Luo, J . ( 2017). Can people recollect well and change their source memory bias of “aha!” experiences? Journal of Creative Behavior, 51( 1), 45-56.
[35] Epstein, R., Kirshnit, C. E., Lanza, R. P., & Rubin, L. C . ( 1984). “Insight” in the pigeon: Antecedents and determinants of an intelligent performance. Nature, 308( 5954), 61-62.
[36] Gick, M. L., & Lockhart, R. S. ( 1995). Cognitive and affective components of insight. In Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 197-228). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
[37] Gruber, H. E. ( 1995). Insight and affect in the history of science. In Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 397-431). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
[38] Hill, G., & Kemp, S. M . ( 2018). Uh-oh! What have we missed? A qualitative investigation into everyday insight experience. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 52( 3), 201-211.
[39] Jones, G. (2003). Testing two cognitive theories of insight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29( 5), 1017-1027.
[40] Kaplan, C. A., &Simon, H. A . ( 1990). In search of insight. Cognitive psychology, 22( 3), 374-419.
[41] Kizilirmak, J. M., Silva, J. G. G. d., Imamoglu, F., & Richardson-Klavehn, A . ( 2015). Generation and the subjective feeling of “aha!” are independently related to learning from insight. Psychological Research, 80( 6), 1059-1074.
[42] Kizilirmak, J. M., Thuerich, H., Folta-Schoofs, K., Schott, B. H., & Richardson-Klavehn, A . ( 2016). Neural correlates of learning from induced insight: A case for reward-based episodic encoding. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1408.
[43] Kizilirmak, J. M., Wiegmann, B., & Richardson-Klavehn, A . ( 2016). Problem solving as an encoding task: A special case of the generation effect. Journal of Problem Solving, 9( 1), 59-76.
[44] Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., Haider, H., Rhenius, D . ( 1999). Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 25( 6), 1534-1555.
[45] Köhler, W. (1925). Komplextheorie und gestalttheorie. Psychologische Forschung, 6( 1), 358-416.
[46] Kumaran, D., & Maguire, E. A . ( 2009). Novelty signals: A window into hippocampal information processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13( 2), 47-54.
[47] Lisman, J. E., & Grace, A. A . ( 2005). The hippocampal-VTA loop: Controlling the entry of information into long-term memory. Neuron, 46( 5), 703-713.
[48] Ludmer, R., Dudai, Y., & Rubin, N . ( 2011). Uncovering camouflage: Amygdala activation predicts long-term memory of induced perceptual insight. Neuron, 69( 5), 1002-1014.
[49] Mayer, R. E. ( 1995). The search for insight: Grappling with Gestalt psychology’s unanswered questions. In Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[50] Mccurdy, M. P., Leach, R. C., & Leshikar, E. D . ( 2017). The generation effect revisited: Fewer generation constraints enhances item and context memory. Journal of Memory and Language , 92,202-216.
[51] Mcelroy, L. A., &Slamecka, N. J . ( 1982). Memorial consequences of generating nonwords: Implications for semantic-memory interpretations of the generation effect. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 21( 3), 249-259.
[52] Mednick, S. A . ( 1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69( 3), 220-232.
[53] Öllinger, M., Jones, G., & Knoblich, G . ( 2006). Heuristics and representational change in two-move matchstick arithmetic tasks. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2( 4), 239-253.
[54] Öllinger, M., Jones, G., & Knoblich, G . ( 2014). The dynamics of search, impasse, and representational change provide a coherent explanation of difficulty in the nine-dot problem. Psychological Research, 78( 2), 266-275.
[55] Otmakhova, N., Duzel, E., Deutch, A. Y., & Lisman, J . ( 2013). The hippocampal-vta loop: The role of novelty and motivation in controlling the entry of information into long-term memory. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 235-254.
[56] Ovington, L. A., Saliba, A. J., Moran, C. C., Goldring, J., & MacDonald, J. B . ( 2018). Do people really have insights in the shower? The when, where and who of the Aha! Moment. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 52( 1), 21-34.
[57] Shen, W. B., Tong, Y., Yuan, Y., Zhan, H. J., Liu, C., Luo, J., & Cai, H . ( 2018). Feeling the insight: Uncovering somatic markers of the “aha” experience. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 43( 1), 13-21.
[58] Shen, W. B., Yuan, Y., Liu, C., & Luo, J . ( 2016). In search of the “Aha!” experience: Elucidating the emotionality of insight problem-solving. British Journal of Psychology, 107( 2), 281-298.
[59] Shen, W. B., Yuan, Y., Zhao, Y., Zhang, X. J., Liu, C., Luo, J., … Fan, L . ( 2018). Defining insight: A study examining implicit theories of insight experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12( 3), 317-327.
[60] Shen, W. B., Zhao, Y., Hommel, B., Yuan, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, Z. Y., & Gu, H. X . ( 2019). The impact of spontaneous and induced mood states on problem solving and memory. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 32, 66-74.
[61] Slamucka, N.J., &Fevreiski, J. (1983). The generation effect when generation fails. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22( 2), 153-163.
[62] Slamecka, N.J., &Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory, 4( 6), 592-604.
[63] Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. ( 1995) . The nature of insight. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[64] Thevenot, C., &Oakhill, J. (2008). A generalization of the representational change theory from insight to non-insight problems: The case of arithmetic word problems. Acta Psychologica, 129( 3), 315-324.
[65] Tulving, E. (2001). Episodic memory and common sense: how far apart? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 356( 1413), 1505-1505.
[66] Weisberg, R. W . ( 2013). On the “demystification” of insight: A critique of neuroimaging studies of insight. Creativity Research Journal, 25( 1), 1-14.
[67] Wills, T. W., Estow, S., Soraci, S. A., & Garcia, J . ( 2006). The aha effect in groups and other dynamic learning contexts. Journal of General Psychology, 133( 3), 221-236.
[68] Wills, T. W., Soraci, S. A., Chechile, R. A., & Taylor, H. A . ( 2000). “Aha” effects in the generation of pictures. Memory & Cognition, 28( 6), 939-948.




[1]王春地, 王大辉. 振动触觉频率信息的工作记忆容量及存储机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1141-1148.
[2]曾宪卿, 许冰, 孙博, 叶健彤, 傅世敏. EMMN受偏差-标准刺激对类型和情绪类型影响: 来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1163-1178.
[3]侯文霞, 田欣然, 刘立志, 易冰, 欧玉晓, 陈文锋, 尚俊辰. 面孔吸引力同化的连续性效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1210-1215.
[4]荆伟, 张婕, 付锦霞, 田琳, 赵微. 婴幼儿面孔注意偏向:先天倾向与发展轨迹——来自正常和孤独症婴幼儿的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1216-1230.
[5]王润洲, 毕鸿燕. 发展性阅读障碍的听觉时间加工缺陷[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1231-1238.
[6]王正雨, 胡金生. 睡眠对创造性问题解决的影响: 基于记忆重组的解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1251-1263.
[7]殷融, 赵嘉. 语法的进化连续性及进化起源解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1264-1278.
[8]李雅宁, 田杨阳, 吴琦, 冷海州, 蒋重清, 杨伊生. 面孔社会知觉中的表情效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 1022-1029.
[9]黄元娜, 李云箫, 李纾. 为什么被选的和被拒的会是同一个备择选项?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 1010-1021.
[10]隋雪, 史汉文, 李雨桐. 语言加工过程中的观点采择及其认知机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 990-999.
[11]何蔚祺, 李帅霞, 赵东方. 群体面孔情绪感知的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 761-772.
[12]于文勃, 王璐, 程幸悦, 王天琳, 张晶晶, 梁丹丹. 语言经验对概率词切分的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 787-795.
[13]肖承丽, 隋雨檠, 肖苏衡, 周仁来. 空间交互研究新视角:多重社会因素的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 796-805.
[14]汪钰涵, 马国杰, 庄想灵. 手机分心对行人过街中信息加工及行为的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 806-814.
[15]尹俊婷, 王冠, 罗俊龙. 威胁对创造力的影响:认知与情绪双加工路径[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 815-826.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4885
相关话题/心理 科学 信息 神经 社会