) 南京师范大学心理学院, 南京 210097
收稿日期:2018-10-08出版日期:2019-07-26发布日期:2019-06-25通讯作者:刘昌E-mail:liuchang@njnu.edu.cnIntuition-based prosociality: Thinking based on social heuristics hypothesis
SHI Rong, LIU Chang() School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China.
Received:2018-10-08Online:2019-07-26Published:2019-06-25Contact:LIU Chang E-mail:liuchang@njnu.edu.cn摘要/Abstract
摘要： 亲社会属性是人类的一个重要特征, 也是研究者一直关注的重点问题。大多数关于亲社会性的理论模型都有一个共同的假设：人类本能地自私, 亲社会行为是对自私进行反思控制的结果。亲社会性直觉模型却提出了相反的假设, 认为在许多情况下, 亲社会行为不需要主动控制自私冲动, 它本身就可以以直觉的(或冲动的)方式出现。亲社会性自动化的行为特征、奖赏寻求的神经特征, 以及儿童亲社会性的早期发展都为亲社会性直觉模型提供了支持性证据。社会启发式假设可以对个体的直觉亲社会性进行解释, 并从情境和个体两个方面对影响直觉亲社会性的因素进行了预测。这不仅为研究者重新思考亲社会行为的根源提供了一个新的视角, 也为未来研究提出了一些可供参考的方向。
参考文献 75
| [1] | 费定舟, 钱东海, 黄旭辰 . (2016). 利他行为的自我控制过程模型: 自我损耗下的道德情绪的正向作用. 心理学报, 48( 9), 1175-1183. |
| [2] | 任俊, 李瑞雪, 詹鋆, 刘迪, 林曼, 彭年强 . (2014). 好人可能做出坏行为的心理学解释——基于自我控制资源损耗的研究证据. 心理学报, 46( 6), 841-851. |
| [3] | 人民网 . (2017. 2016年我国接收国内外款物捐赠1392.94亿元. 2017-11-03取自 |
| [4] | 张和云 . (2016). 善良人格的结构、认知加工特点及其对善行表达的影响研究 (博士学位论文). 北京师范大学. |
| [5] | 张振, 张帆, 黄亮, 袁博, 王益文 . (2014). 决策中社会价值取向的理论与测评方法. 心理科学进展, 22( 1), 48-56. |
| [6] | Aknin L. B., Dunn E. W., & Norton M. I . (2012). Happiness runs in a circular motion: Evidence for a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13( 2), 347-355. |
| [7] | Batson C. D., & Adam A. P ., (2003). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), I. B. Weiner (Ed.-in-chief). . Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology. (Vol.5, pp.463-484 ). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons. |
| [8] | Bear A. &Rand D.G . (2016). Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113( 4), 936-941. |
| [9] | Bolton G.., &Ockenfels A., (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90( 1), 166-193. |
| [10] | Burger J. M., Messian N., Patel S., del Prado A., & Anderson C . (2004). What a coincidence! The effects of incidental similarity on compliance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30( 1), 35-43. |
| [11] | Capraro V. &Cococcioni G., (2015). Social setting, intuition and experience in laboratory experiments interact to shape cooperative decision-making. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282( 1811), 1003-1007. |
| [12] | Capraro V. &Cococcioni G., (2016). Rethinking spontaneous giving: Extreme time pressure and ego-depletion favor self-regarding reactions. Scientific Reports, 6, Article 27219. |
| [13] | Carlson R. W., Aknin L. B., & Liotti M . (2016). When is giving an impulse? An ERP investigation of intuitive prosocial behavior. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11( 7), 1121-1129. |
| [14] | Chudek M. &Henrich J., (2011). Culture-gene co-evolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15( 5), 218-226. |
| [15] | Cohn J., Squire P., Estabrooke I. , & O’Neill E. (2013) .Enhancing intuitive decision making through implicit learning. In: Schmorrow D. D., Fidopiastis C. M. (Eds) Foundations of Augmented Cognition. AC 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8027. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. |
| [16] | Cornelissen G., Dewitte S., & Warlop L . (2011). Are social value orientations expressed automatically? Decision making in the dictator game. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37( 8), 1080-1090. |
| [17] | Cox A., Kohls G., Naples A. J., Mukerji C. E., Coffman M. C., Rutherford H. J., .. McPartland J. C . (2015). Diminished social reward anticipation in the broad autism phenotype as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10( 10), 1357-1364. |
| [18] | Cropanzano R., Byrne Z. S., Bobocel D. R., & Rupp D. E . (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58( 2), 164-209. |
| [19] | Dawes C. T., Loewen P. J., Schreiber D., Simmons A. N., Flagan T., McElreath R., .. Paulus M. P . (2012). Neural basis of egalitarian behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 6479-6483. |
| [20] | DeSteno D. (2009). Social emotions and intertemporal choice, “hot” mechanisms for building social and economic capital. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18( 5), 280-284. |
| [21] | DeVoe S.., &House J., (2016). Replications with MTurkers who are na?ve versus experienced with academic studies: A comment on connors, khamitov, moroz, campbell, and henderson (2015). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 65-67. |
| [22] | D?ssing F., Piovesan M., & Wengstr?m E . (2017). Cognitive load and cooperation. Review of Behavioral Economics, 4( 1), 69-81. |
| [23] | Dunham Y., Baron A. S., & Banaji M. R . (2008). The development of implicit intergroup cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12( 7), 248-253. |
| [24] | Ellingsen T., Herrmann B., Nowak M., Rand D., & Tarnita C. (2012). Civic capital in two cultures: The nature of cooperation in Romania and USA. Working paper, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm. . |
| [25] | Engel C. &Rand D.G . (2014). What does “clean” really mean? The implicit framing of decontextualized experiments. Economics Letters, 122( 3), 386-389. |
| [26] | Evans J. S. . (2017). Dual-process theories.In L. J. Ball, & V. A. Thompson (Eds.). International Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning(p. 173-188). New York, NY: Routledge. |
| [27] | Feygina I. &Henry P.J . (2015). Culture and prosocial behavior.In D. A. Schroeder,& W. G.Eds.). The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior |
| [28] | Foerde K., Knowlton B. J., & Poldrack R. A . (2006). Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103( 31), 11778-11783. |
| [29] | Garon N., Bryson S. E., & Smith I. M . (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134( 1), 31-60. |
| [30] | G?rtner M. (2018). The prosociality of intuitive decisions depends on the status quo. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 74, 127-138. |
| [31] | Halali E., Bereby-Meyer Y., & Meiran N . (2014). Between self-interest and reciprocity: The social bright side of self-control failure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143( 2), 745-754. |
| [32] | Hamlin J. K., Wynn K., & Bloom P . (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature,450(7169), 557-559. |
| [33] | Hare T. A., Camerer C. F., & Rangel A . (2009). Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science, 324( 5927), 646-648. |
| [34] | Heilman M.., &Chen J.J . (2005). Same behavior, different consequences: Reactions to men’s and women’s altruistic citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90( 3), 431-441. |
| [35] | Henrich J., Boyd R., Bowles S., Camerer C., Fehr E., Gintis H., .. Tracer D . (2005). “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,28(6), 795-855. |
| [36] | Henrich J., Heine S. J., & Norenzayan A . (2010). The weirdest people in the world?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33( 2-3), 61-83. |
| [37] | Kahneman D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow.New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux. |
| [38] | Knowlton B. J., Mangels J. A., & Squire L. R . (1996). A neostriatal habit learning system in humans. Science, 273( 5280), 1399-1402. |
| [39] | Krupka E.., &Weber R.A . (2013). Identifying social norms using coordination games: Why does dictator game sharing vary? Journal of the European Economic Association, 11( 3), 495-524. |
| [40] | Lepper M. R., Greene D., & Nisbett R. E . (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28( 1), 129-137. |
| [41] | Lieberman M. D. (2007).The X- and C-systems:The neural basis of automatic and controlled social cognition. In E. HarmonJones & P. Winkielman (Eds.), Fundamentals of social neuroscience (pp. 290-315) New York, NY: Guilford Press. |
| [42] | Liu C-J. &Hao F., (2011). An application of a dual-process approach to decision making in social dilemmas. American Journal of Psychology, 124( 2), 203-212. |
| [43] | Lotz S. (2015). Spontaneous giving under structural inequality: Intuition promotes cooperation in asymmetric social dilemmas. PLoS One, 10( 7), e0131562. |
| [44] | Ma Y., Liu Y., Rand D. G., Heatherton T. F., & Han S . (2015). Opposing oxytocin effects on intergroup cooperative behavior in intuitive and reflective minds. Neuropsychopharmacology, 40( 10), 2379-2387. |
| [45] | McAuliffe K., Blake P. R., Steinbeis N., & Warneken F . (2017). The developmental foundations of human fairness. Nature Human Behaviour, 1( 2), 1-9. |
| [46] | Mischkowski D., Thielmann I., & Gl?ckner A . (2018). Think it through before making a choice? Processing mode does not influence social mindfulness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 85-97. |
| [47] | Moll J., Krueger F., Zahn R., Pardini M., de Oliveira-Souza R., & Grafman J . (2006). Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,103(42), 15623-15628. |
| [48] | Morelli S. A., Rameson L.T., Lieberman M. D . (2014). The neuralcomponents of empathy: Predicting daily prosocial behavior. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,9(1), 39-47. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss088 |
| [49] | Niendam T. A., Laird A. R., Ray K. L., Dean Y. M., Glahn D. C., & Carter C. S . (2012). Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions. Cognitive,Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12(2), 241-268. |
| [50] | Penner L. A., Dovidio J. F., Piliavin J. A., & Schroeder D. A . (2005). Prosocial behavior: multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology,56 365-392. |
| [51] | Peysakhovich A. &Rand D.G . (2015). Habits of virtue: Creating norms of cooperation and defection in the laboratory. Management Science,62(3), 631-647. |
| [52] | Pfabigan D. M., Seidel E-M., Sladky R., Hahn A., Paul K., Grahl A., .. Windischberger C . (2014). P300 amplitude variation is related to ventral striatum BOLD response during gain and loss anticipation: An EEG and fMRI experiment. NeuroImage,96(100), 12-21. |
| [53] | Protzko J., Ouimette B., & Schooler J . (2016). Believing there is no free will corrupts intuitive cooperation. Cognition,151 6-9. |
| [54] | Rand D. . (2017). Social dilemma cooperation (unlike Dictator Game giving) is intuitive for men as well as women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,73 164-168. |
| [55] | Rand D. G., Brescoll V. L., Everett J. A. C., Capraro V., & Barcelo H . (2016). Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,145(4), 389-396. |
| [56] | Rand D.., &Epstein Z.G . (2014). Risking your life without a second thought: Intuitive decision-making and extreme altruism. PLoS One,9(10), e109687. |
| [57] | Rand D. G., Greene J. D., & Nowak M. A . (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature,489(7416), 427-430. doi: 10.1038/nature11467 |
| [58] | Rand D.., &Kraft-Todd G.T . (2014). Reflection does not undermine self-interested prosociality. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience,8 300. |
| [59] | Rand D.., &Nowak M.A . (2013). Human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,17(8), 413-425. |
| [60] | Rand D. G., Newman G. E., & Wurzbacher O. M . (2015). Social context and the dynamics of cooperative choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,28(2), 159-166. |
| [61] | Rand D. G., Peysakhovich A., Kraft-Todd G. T., Newman G. E., Wurzbacher O., Nowak M. A., & Greene J. D . (2014). Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation. Nature Communications,5(3677), 1-12. |
| [62] | Righetti F., Finkenauer C., & Finkel E. J . (2013). Low self-control promotes the willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Psychological Science,24(8), 1533-1540. |
| [63] | Ruff C.., &Fehr E., (2014). The neurobiology of rewards and values in social decision making. Nature Reviews Neuroscience,15(8), 549-562. doi: 10.1038/nrn3776 |
| [64] | Shenhav A., Rand D. G., & Greene J. D . (2012). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,141(3), 423-428. |
| [65] | Steinbeis N., Bernhardt B. C., & Singer T . (2012). Impulse control and underlying functions of the left DLPFC mediate age-related and age-independent individual differences in strategic social behavior. Neuron,73(5), 1040-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.027 |
| [66] | Stevens J.., &Hauser M.D . (2004). Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8(2), 60-65. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.003 |
| [67] | Stivala A., Kashima Y., & Kirley M . (2016). Culture and cooperation in a spatial public goods game . Physical Review E,94(3-1), 032303. |
| [68] | Swami V., Voracek M., Stieger S., Tran U. S., & Furnham A . (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition,133(3), 572-585. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006 |
| [69] | Tingh?g G., Andersson D., Bonn C., B?ttiger H., Josephson C., Lundgren G., .. Johannesson M . (2013). Intuition and cooperation reconsidered. Nature,498(7452), E1-E2. |
| [70] | Tricomi E., Rangel A., Camerer C. F., & O’Doherty J. P . (2010). Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences. Nature,463(7284), 1089-1091. |
| [71] | Warneken F. (2015). Precocious prosociality: Why do young children help? Child Development Perspectives,9(1), 1-6. |
| [72] | Warneken F. &Tomasello M., (2009). Varieties of altruism in children and chimpanzees. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,13(9), 397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.008 |
| [73] | Zaki J. A., &Mitchell J. P (2016). Prosociality as a form of reward-seeking. In J. D. Greene, I. Morrison, & M. E. P. Seligman (Eds.), Positive neuroscience (pp. 57-72). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| [74] | Zaki J. &Mitchell J.P . (2013). Intuitive prosociality. Current Directions in Psychological Science,22(6), 466-470. doi: 10.1177/0963721413492764 |
| [75] | Zitek E. M., Jordan A. H., Monin B., & Leach F. R . (2010). Victim entitlement to behave selfishly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,98(2), 245-255. |
相关文章 15
| [1] | 魏真瑜, 邓湘树, 赵治瀛. 亲社会行为中的从众效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(3): 531-539. |
| [2] | 严秋斯, 隋杨, 郝雪晶. 亲组织不道德行为的解释机制与理论模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 338-352. |
| [3] | 李馨, 刘培, 肖晨洁, 王笑天, 李爱梅. 组织中权力如何促进亲社会行为?责任感知的中介作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(9): 1586-1598. |
| [4] | 李庆功, 王震炎, 孙捷元, 师妍. 网约车场景中声誉和面孔可信度对女性信任判断的影响以及直觉性思维的调节作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(5): 746-751. |
| [5] | 汤明, 李伟强, 刘福会, 袁博. 内疚与亲社会行为的关系：来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(5): 773-788. |
| [6] | 陈庆伟, 汝涛涛, 周菊燕, 李静华, 熊晓, 李笑然, 周国富. 光照对社会心理和行为的影响 *[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(6): 1083-1095. |
| [7] | 邹小燕, 尹可丽, 陆 林. 集体仪式促进凝聚力：基于动作、情绪与记忆[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(5): 939-950. |
| [8] | 程南华, 李占星, 朱莉琪. 儿童的社会权力认知及其与社会行为的关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(2): 283-293. |
| [9] | 张雪姣;刘聪慧. 亲社会行为中的“眼睛效应”[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(3): 475-485. |
| [10] | 丁凤琴; 陆朝晖. 共情与亲社会行为关系的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(8): 1159-1174. |
| [11] | 张一;陈容;刘衍玲. 亲社会视频游戏对国外青少年行为的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(10): 1600-1612. |
| [12] | 苑明亮;张梦圆;寇彧. 亲社会名声与亲社会行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(10): 1655-1662. |
| [13] | 蔡頠;吴嵩;寇彧. 权力对亲社会行为的影响：机制及相关因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(1): 120-131. |
| [14] | 冯雪;彭凯平. 技能和风格：理性思维的两种测量途径[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(9): 1550-1559. |
| [15] | 叶红燕;张凤华. 从具身视角看道德判断[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(8): 1480-1488. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4771
