删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

组织认同对员工创新行为的促进和抑制过程

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

刘艳(), 邹希, 舒心
武汉大学经济与管理学院, 武汉 430072
收稿日期:2018-12-14出版日期:2019-07-15发布日期:2019-05-22
通讯作者:刘艳E-mail:leannaliu@whu.edu.cn

基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金项目(71872135);教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目资助(17YJA630062)

The process whereby organizational identification promotes and prohibits employees’ innovative behavior

LIU Yan(), ZOU Xi, SHU Xin
School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
Received:2018-12-14Online:2019-07-15Published:2019-05-22
Contact:LIU Yan E-mail:leannaliu@whu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 企业稳定发展的关键之一是员工对组织的高认同感。员工创新是企业创新发展的基石。然而关于组织认同对创新行为影响的研究发现并不一致。规范冲突模型为深入理解二者之间的关系提供了理论视角。根据此模型, 员工组织认同通过不满现状和遵守现状两个相反的路径对创新行为产生促进和抑制的双重影响; 员工规范冲突感知是引发不满现状和遵守现状产生的重要条件; 领导创新期待与创新支持在组织认同对员工创新行为的促进和抑制过程中起到调节作用。


表1组织认同对员工行为的影响及研究空白
促进影响 抑制影响 研究空白
(1)组织公民行为
例如:Dukerich et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2015
(2)建言行为
例如:Chamberlin et al., 2017; Knoll & van Dick, 2013
(3)亲组织不道德行为
例如:Effelsberg et al., 2014
(4)忠诚行为
例如:马力等, 2011
(5)支持变革行为
例如:Fuchs & Edwards, 2012
(6)与同事分享知识
例如:Carmeli et al., 2011; 杜恒波等, 2017
(7)工作敬业度
例如:简浩贤等, 2017
(8)角色内任务表现
例如:Chen et al., 2015; Liden et al., 2014
(9)工作创新与主动负责
例如:Madjar et al., 2011; 陈静, 林凤, 2017; Li et al., 2016
(10)其他边界条件
例如:Lee et al., 2015; Lam et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2011; Li et al., 2016; Hekman et al., 2016
(1)创新度
例如:Rotondi, 1975
(2)建言行为
例如:Tangirala & Ramanujam, 2008
(3)组织学习
例如:Dukerich et al., 1998
(4)组织承诺
例如:Haslam et al., 2006
(5)组织变革
例如:Bouchikhi & Kimberly, 2003
(6)离职行为
例如:Zhu, Tatachari, &
Chattopadhyay, 2017
(1) ****们在研究组织认同时, 要么只关注其对员工行为的积极影响, 要么只看消极影响, 而极少把正面和负面影响一起研究;
(2) 虽然组织认同是影响员工行为的重要因素(Lee et al., 2015), 但是组织认同对创新行为影响并不明朗。

表1组织认同对员工行为的影响及研究空白
促进影响 抑制影响 研究空白
(1)组织公民行为
例如:Dukerich et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2015
(2)建言行为
例如:Chamberlin et al., 2017; Knoll & van Dick, 2013
(3)亲组织不道德行为
例如:Effelsberg et al., 2014
(4)忠诚行为
例如:马力等, 2011
(5)支持变革行为
例如:Fuchs & Edwards, 2012
(6)与同事分享知识
例如:Carmeli et al., 2011; 杜恒波等, 2017
(7)工作敬业度
例如:简浩贤等, 2017
(8)角色内任务表现
例如:Chen et al., 2015; Liden et al., 2014
(9)工作创新与主动负责
例如:Madjar et al., 2011; 陈静, 林凤, 2017; Li et al., 2016
(10)其他边界条件
例如:Lee et al., 2015; Lam et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2011; Li et al., 2016; Hekman et al., 2016
(1)创新度
例如:Rotondi, 1975
(2)建言行为
例如:Tangirala & Ramanujam, 2008
(3)组织学习
例如:Dukerich et al., 1998
(4)组织承诺
例如:Haslam et al., 2006
(5)组织变革
例如:Bouchikhi & Kimberly, 2003
(6)离职行为
例如:Zhu, Tatachari, &
Chattopadhyay, 2017
(1) ****们在研究组织认同时, 要么只关注其对员工行为的积极影响, 要么只看消极影响, 而极少把正面和负面影响一起研究;
(2) 虽然组织认同是影响员工行为的重要因素(Lee et al., 2015), 但是组织认同对创新行为影响并不明朗。



图1具体研究问题
图1具体研究问题



图2组织认同对员工创新行为促进和抑制的影响路径研究(综合模型)
图2组织认同对员工创新行为促进和抑制的影响路径研究(综合模型)







[1] 陈静, 林凤 . (2017). 组织氛围对员工创新行为的影响研究——以组织认同为中介变量. 物流工程与管理, 39(07), 178-180.
[2] 杜恒波, 朱千林, 许衍凤 . (2017). 职场欺凌对研发人员知识分享意愿的影响机制研究. 中国软科学, (2), 113-122.
[3] 顾远东, 周文莉, 彭纪生 . (2016). 组织创新支持感与员工创新行为: 多重认同的中介作用. 科技管理研究, 36(16), 129-136.
[4] 简浩贤, 徐云飞, 曹曼, 赵曙明 . (2017). 基于组织认同视角的包容性领导与员工敬业度关系研究. 管理学报, 14(11), 1624-1630.
[5] 刘晔, 曲如杰, 时勘, 邓麦村 . (2016). 领导创新期待对员工根本性创新行为的影响: 创新过程投入的视角. 南开管理评论, 19(6), 17-26.
[6] 马力, 焦捷, 陈爱华, 姜翰 . (2011). 通过法则关系区分员工对组织的认同与反认同. 心理学报, 43(3), 322-337.
[7] 马璐, 朱双 . (2015). 组织认同与关系冲突视角下不当督导对员工创新行为的影响. 科技进步与对策, 32(21), 150-155.
[8] 王艳子, 罗瑾琏 . (2010). 组织认同对员工创新行为的影响研究:基于知识共享的中介效应分析. 管理现代化,(6), 47-49.
[9] 徐美芳 . (2017). 金融业员工创新行为与组织认同关系研究——基于上海某大型金融企业的调研. 上海经济研究, 10, 59-67.
[10] 张伶, 聂婷, 黄华 . (2014). 基于工作压力和组织认同中介调节效应检验的家庭亲善政策与创新行为关系研究. 管理学报, 11(5), 683-690.
[11] Abrams D., Marques J. M., Bown N., & Henson M . (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 906-912.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.906URL
[12] Abrams D., Wetherell M., Cochrane S., Hogg M. A., & Turner J. C . (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2), 97-119.
doi: 10.1111/bjso.1990.29.issue-2URL
[13] Anderson N., Potočnik K., & Zhou J . (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333.
[14] Ashforth B. E., Harrison S. H., & Corley K. G . (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325-374.
[15] Ashforth B. E., & Mael F. , (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
doi: 10.5465/amr.1989.4278999URL
[16] Baer M. ,(2012). Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1102-1119.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2009.0470URL
[17] Barba-Sánchez V., & Atienza-Sahuquillo C. , (2017). Entrepreneurial motivation and self-employment: Evidence from expectancy theory. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(4), 1097-1115.
doi: 10.1007/s11365-017-0441-zURL
[18] Birkinshaw J., & Mol M. , (2006). How management innovation happens. MIT Slogan Management Review, 47(4), 81-88.
[19] Blader S. L., Patil S., & Packer D. J . (2017). Organizational identification and workplace behavior: More than meets the eye. Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, 37, 19-34.
[20] Bouchikhi H., & Kimberly J. R . (2003). Escaping the identity trap. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 20-26.
[21] Burris E. R., Rockmann K. W., & Kimmons Y. S . (2017). The value of voice to managers: Employee identification and the content of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2099-2125.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2014.0320URL
[22] Carmeli A., Atwater L., & Levi A . (2011). How leadership enhances employees' knowledge sharing: the intervening roles of relational and organizational identification. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 257-274.
doi: 10.1007/s10961-010-9154-yURL
[23] Chamberlin M., Newton D. W., & Lepine J. A . (2017). A meta-analysis of voice and its promotive and prohibitive forms: Identification of key associations, distinctions, and future research directions. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 11-71.
doi: 10.1111/peps.2017.70.issue-1URL
[24] Chan S. C. H . (2017). Benevolent leadership, perceived supervisory support, and subordinates' performance: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(7), 897-911.
[25] Chen G., Farh J. L., Campbell-Bush E. M., Wu Z. M., & Wu X . (2013). Teams as innovative systems: multilevel motivational antecedents of innovation in R&D teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1018-1027.
doi: 10.1037/a0032663URL
[26] Chen Z. J., Zhu J., & Zhou M. J . (2015). How does a servant leader fuel the service fire? A multilevel model of servant leadership, individual self identity, group competition climate, and customer service performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 511-521.
doi: 10.1037/a0038036URL
[27] Coyle-Shapiro J. A-M., & Shore L. M . (2007). The employee-organization relationship: Where do we go from here? Human Resource Management Review, 17(2), 166-179.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.03.008URL
[28] Dahling J. J., & Gutworth M. B . (2017). Loyal rebels? A test of the normative conflict model of constructive deviance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(8), 1167-1182.
doi: 10.1002/job.v38.8URL
[29] Dukerich J. M., Golden B. R., & Shortell S. M . (2002). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification identity and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(3), 507-533.
doi: 10.2307/3094849URL
[30] Dukerich J. M., Kramer R., & McLean Parks J . (1998). The dark side of organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten, & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations(pp. 245-256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[31] Dyer W. G., & Page R. A Jr. ., (1988). The politics of innovation. Knowledge in the Society, 1(2), 23-41.
[32] Effelsberg D., Solga M., & Gurt J . (2014). Transformational leadership and follower’s unethical behavior for the benefit of the company: A two-study investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(1), 81-93.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1644-zURL
[33] Ford C. M . (1996). Theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112-1142.
doi: 10.5465/amr.1996.9704071865URL
[34] Fuchs S., & Edwards M. R . (2012). Predicting pro-change behavior: The role of perceived organisational justice and organizational identification. Human Resource Management Journal, 22(1), 39-59.
[35] Fuller J. B., Hester K., Barnett T., Frey L., Relyea C., & Beu D . (2006). Perceived external prestige and internal respect: New insights into the organizational identification process. Human Relations, 59(6), 815-846.
doi: 10.1177/0018726706067148URL
[36] Grant A. M., & Berry J. W . (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73-96.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.59215085URL
[37] Haslam S. A., Ryan M. K., Postmes T., Spears R., Jetten J., & Webley P . (2006). Sticking to our guns: social identity as a basis for the maintenance of commitment to faltering organizational projects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 607-628.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379URL
[38] Hekman D. R., van Knippenberg D., & Pratt M. G . (2016). Channeling identification: How perceived regulatory focus moderates the influence of organizational and professional identification on professional employees' diagnosis and treatment behaviors. Human Relations, 69(3), 753-780.
doi: 10.1177/0018726715599240URL
[39] Hekman D. R., Steensma H. K., Bigley G. A., & Hereford J. F . (2009). Effects of organizational and professional identification on the relationship between administrators’ social influence and professional employees’ adoption of new work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1325-1335.
doi: 10.1037/a0015315URL
[40] Jackson S. E., & Schuler R. S . (1985). A Meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(1), 16-78.
[41] Knoll M., & Van Dick R. , (2013). Authenticity, employee silence, prohibitive voice, and the moderating effect of organizational identification. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(4), 346-360.
doi: 10.1080/17439760.2013.804113URL
[42] Koopman J., Lanaj K., & Scott B. A . (2016). Integrating the bright and dark sides of OCB: A daily investigation of the benefits and costs of helping others. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 414-435.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2014.0262URL
[43] Lam L. W., Liu Y., & Loi R . (2016). Looking intra-organizationally for identity cues: Whether perceived organizational support shapes employees' organizational identification. Human Relations, 69(2), 345-367.
doi: 10.1177/0018726715584689URL
[44] Lee E. S., Park T. Y., & Koo B . (2015). Identifying organizational identification as a basis for attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 1049-1080.
doi: 10.1037/bul0000012URL
[45] Leung K., Chen Z. J., Zhou F., & Lim K . (2014). The role of relational orientation as measured by face and renqing in innovative behavior in China: An indigenous analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(1), 105-126.
doi: 10.1007/s10490-011-9277-1URL
[46] Leung K., Huang K-L., Su C-H., & Lu L . (2011). Curvilinear relationships between role stress and innovative performance: Moderating effects of perceived support for innovation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(4), 741-758.
doi: 10.1348/096317910X520421URL
[47] Li R., Zhang Z-Y., & Tian X-M . (2016). Can self-sacrificial leadership promote subordinate taking charge? The mediating role of organizational identification and the moderating role of risk aversion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(5), 758-781.
doi: 10.1002/job.v37.5URL
[48] Liden R. C., Wayne S. J., Liao C. W., & Meuser J. D . (2014). Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1434-1452.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2013.0034URL
[49] Lin K. J., Ilies R., Pluut H., & Pan S-Y . (2017). You are a helpful co-worker, but do you support your spouse? A resource-based work-family model of helping and support provision. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 138, 45-58.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.12.004URL
[50] Liu Y., Loi R., & Lam L. W . (2011). Linking organizational identification and employee performance in teams: The moderating role of team-member exchange. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(15), 3187-3201.
doi: 10.1080/09585192.2011.560875URL
[51] Madjar N., Greenberg E., & Chen Z . (2011). Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 730-743.
doi: 10.1037/a0022416URL
[52] March J. G., & Simon H. A . (1958). Organizations. Oxford, England: Wiley.
[53] Marinova S. V., Peng C. Y., Lorinkova N., Van Dyne L., & Chiaburu D . (2015). Change-oriented behavior: A meta-analysis of individual and job design predictors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 104-120.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.02.006URL
[54] Martínez-Sánchez A., Vela-Jiménez M-J., Pérez-Pérez M., & de-Luis-Carnicer P . (2011). The dynamics of labour flexibility: Relationships between employment type and innovativeness. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 715-736.
[55] Morrison E. W . (2006). Doing the job well: an investigation of pro-social rule breaking. Journal of Management, 32(1), 5-28.
[56] Morrison E. W . (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational and Psychological Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 173-197.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328URL
[57] Morrison E. W . (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412.
doi: 10.1080/19416520.2011.574506URL
[58] Packer D. J . (2008). On being both with us and against us: A normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(1), 50-72.
doi: 10.1177/1088868307309606URL
[59] Packer D. J., & Chasteen A. L . (2010). Loyal deviance: Testing the normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(1), 5-18.
doi: 10.1177/0146167209350628URL
[60] Pierce J. R., & Aguinis H. , (2013). The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect in management. Journal of Management, 39(2), 313-338.
[61] Rotondi T. Jr. , (1975). Organizational identification - issues and implications. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 95-109.
doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(75)90007-0URL
[62] Russo T. C . 1998. Organizational and professional identification: A case of newspaper journalists. Management Communication Quarterly, 12, 72-111.
doi: 10.1177/0893318998121003URL
[63] Salancik G. R Pfeffer J ., (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224-253.
doi: 10.2307/2392563URL
[64] Scott S. G., & Bruce R. A . (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the Workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
[65] Shin S. J., Yuan F. R., & Zhou J . (2017). When perceived innovation job requirement increases employee innovative behavior: A sensemaking perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(1), 68-86.
doi: 10.1002/job.v38.1URL
[66] Shipton H. J., West M. A., Parkes C. L., Dawson J. F., & Patterson M. G . (2006). When promoting positive feelings pays: Aggregate job satisfaction, work design features, and innovation in manufacturing organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(4), 404-430.
doi: 10.1080/13594320600908153URL
[67] Smith M. B., Hill A. D., Wallace J. C., Recendes T., & Judge T. A . (2018). Upsides to dark and downsides to bright personality: A multidomain review and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 44(1), 191-217.
[68] Sorensen J. E., & Sorensen T. , (1974). The conflict of professionals in bureaucratic organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(1), 98-106.
doi: 10.2307/2391790URL
[69] Tajfel H. ,(1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[70] Tajfel H., & Turner J. , (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations(pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
[71] Tangirala S., & Ramanujam R. , (2008). Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice: The effects of personal control and organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1189-1203.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2008.35732719URL
[72] Taylor F. W . (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper & Brothers.
[73] Terry D. J., & Hogg M. A . (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(8), 776-793.
doi: 10.1177/0146167296228002URL
[74] Van de Ven, A. H . (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590-607.
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590URL
[75] Van Dyne L., & LePine J. A . (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
[76] Vroom V. H . (1964). Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[77] Wallace J. C., Butts M. M., Johnson P. D., Stevens F. G., & Smith M. B . (2016). A multilevel model of employee innovation: Understanding the effects of regulatory focus, thriving, and employee involvement climate. Journal of Management, 42(4), 982-1004.
[78] Wang X-H., Fang Y. L., Qureshi I., & Janssen O . (2015). Understanding employee innovative behavior: Integrating the social network and leader-member exchange perspectives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(3), 403-420.
doi: 10.1002/job.v36.3URL
[79] West M. A., & Farr J. L . (1990). Innovation at Work. In West and Farr (Eds), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies(pp. 3-14). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
[80] Yuan F., & Woodman R. W . (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.49388995URL
[81] Zhou J., & George J. M . (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696.
[82] Zhu J., Tatachari S., & Chattopadhyay P . (2017). Newcomer identification: Trends, antecedents, moderators, and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), 855-879.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2015.0466URL




[1]李馨, 刘培, 肖晨洁, 王笑天, 李爱梅. 组织中权力如何促进亲社会行为?责任感知的中介作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(9): 1586-1598.
[2]颜爱民, 李亚丽, 谢菊兰, 李莹. 员工对企业社会责任的差异化反应:基于归因理论的阐释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(6): 1004-1014.
[3]杨洁, 张露, 黄勇. 互联网企业玩兴氛围对创新行为的跨层次作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(4): 523-534.
[4]王晓辰, 高欣洁, 郭攀博. 亲组织不道德行为的多层次模型 *[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(6): 1111-1120.
[5]魏钧;陈中原;张勉. 组织认同的基础理论、测量及相关变量[J]. 心理科学进展, 2007, 15(6): 948-955.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4721
相关话题/组织 创新 管理 心理 科学

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 1993至2016年医学生心理健康变迁的横断历史研究
    辛素飞1(),姜文源1,辛自强21鲁东大学教育科学学院,烟台2640112中央财经大学社会与心理学院,北京100081收稿日期:2018-09-14出版日期:2019-07-15发布日期:2019-05-22通讯作者:辛素飞E-mail:xinsufei2005@163.com基金资助:*国家社会科 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 素食的心理过程及影响因素
    刘潇肖1,田启瑞2(),曾雅丽11厦门大学管理学院,厦门3610052山东师范大学心理学院,济南250358收稿日期:2018-08-12出版日期:2019-07-15发布日期:2019-05-22通讯作者:田启瑞E-mail:tianqirui@sdnu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金青 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 和谐医患关系的心理机制及其促进技术
    孙连荣1,王沛2()1上海师范大学天华学院,上海2018152华东师范大学教育学部特殊教育系,上海200062收稿日期:2018-03-07出版日期:2019-06-15发布日期:2019-04-22通讯作者:王沛E-mail:wangpei1970@163.com基金资助:国家社会科学重大招标项目 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 忠诚还是叛逆?中国组织情境下的员工越轨创新行为
    王弘钰,崔智淞(),邹纯龙,于佳利,赵迪吉林大学商学院,长春130012收稿日期:2018-08-20出版日期:2019-06-15发布日期:2019-04-22通讯作者:崔智淞E-mail:Jeremy_cui@yahoo.com基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(71872069);教育部人文社会科 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 动机视角下的亲组织不道德行为
    程垦1(),林英晖21同济大学经济与管理学院,上海2000922上海大学管理学院,上海200444收稿日期:2018-08-23出版日期:2019-06-15发布日期:2019-04-22通讯作者:程垦E-mail:chengken1992@126.com基金资助:上海市社科规划项目资助(2017B ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 多维范式下神经组织行为学的哲学基础、理论框架和研究方法
    刘玉新1(),陈晨1,朱楠1,季正21对外经济贸易大学国际商学院2对外经济贸易大学保险学院,北京100029收稿日期:2018-07-10出版日期:2019-06-15发布日期:2019-04-22通讯作者:刘玉新E-mail:liuyx21@263.net基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(71373 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 组织公民行为与反生产行为的互动关系:一个基于情绪与认知整合框架的阐释
    赵君1,鄢苗1,肖素芳1,张永军2()1中南财经政法大学公共管理学院,武汉4300732河南大学商学院,开封475004收稿日期:2018-05-08出版日期:2019-05-15发布日期:2019-03-20通讯作者:张永军E-mail:zhangyj0505@126.com基金资助:*国家自然科 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 风险决策的概率权重偏差:心理机制与优化策略
    孙庆洲,邬青渊,张静,江程铭,赵雷,胡凤培()浙江工业大学管理学院,杭州310023收稿日期:2018-08-23出版日期:2019-05-15发布日期:2019-03-20通讯作者:胡凤培E-mail:fengpei@zjut.edu.cn基金资助:*教育部人文社科青年基金项目(18YJC6301 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 追踪研究在组织行为学中的应用
    胥彦,李超平()中国人民大学公共管理学院组织与人力资源研究所,北京100872收稿日期:2018-05-07出版日期:2019-04-15发布日期:2019-02-22通讯作者:李超平E-mail:lichaoping@ruc.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金资助(71772171);国家自 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 不道德传染的心理机制及其影响
    王悦1,龚园超1,2,3,李莹1()1郑州大学教育学院,郑州4500012中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室,北京1001013中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049收稿日期:2018-06-05出版日期:2019-04-15发布日期:2019-02-22通讯作者:李莹E-mail:liyin ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01