胥彦, 李超平()

中国人民大学公共管理学院组织与人力资源研究所, 北京 100872

收稿日期:2018-05-07出版日期:2019-04-15发布日期:2019-02-22
通讯作者:李超平E-mail:lichaoping@ruc.edu.cn

基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金资助(71772171);国家自然科学基金资助(71372159);教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目资助(17YJA630073);中国人民大学“中央高校建设世界一流大学(学科)和特色发展引导专项资金”支持

Application of longitudinal study in organizational behavior research

XU Yan, LI Chaoping()

School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Received:2018-05-07Online:2019-04-15Published:2019-02-22
Contact:LI Chaoping E-mail:lichaoping@ruc.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 追踪研究是一种通过引入时滞, 以探索变量动态变化趋势和变量之间相互关系的调查研究方法。近年来, 在组织行为学中, 追踪研究越来越受到****们的关注, 追踪研究成果也在逐渐增加, 但是大多数研究者尤其是国内研究者, 对追踪研究尚缺乏全面正确的认识。追踪研究设计可以依照重复测量之间的时间间隔长短进行分类, 不同的类型对应不同的样本量、调查方式和统计分析方法, 未来可以拓展追踪研究在团队和领导力、组织文化和变革以及员工激励等方面的应用, 或开展跨文化的追踪研究。

图/表 1

图1追踪研究的主要步骤 注：作者根据相关资料整理所得
图1追踪研究的主要步骤 注：作者根据相关资料整理所得

参考文献 48

[1]	傅飞强, 彭剑锋 . ( 2017). 个人传记特征对工作绩效的影响: 一项4年的追踪研究. 商业经济与管理, 37, (6), 48-59. doi: 10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2017.06.005URL
[2]	刘红云, 张雷 . ( 2005). 追踪数据分析方法及其应用. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
[3]	王云峰, 史菁菁, 毛春芳 . ( 2016). App应用于跟踪调查的可行性分析. 中国科技信息, 1, 69-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8972.2016.01.022URL
[4]	温忠麟 . ( 2017). 实证研究中的因果推理与分析. 心理科学, 40, (1), 200-208.
[5]	叶素静, 唐文清, 张敏强, 曹魏聪 . ( 2014). 追踪研究中缺失数据处理方法及应用现状分析. 心理科学进展, 22, (12), 1985-1994. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01985URL
[6]	张银普, 骆南峰, 石伟 . ( 2016). 经验取样法——一种收集“真实”数据的新方法. 心理科学进展, 24, (2), 305-316. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00305URL
[7]	张银普, 石伟, 骆南峰, 邢璐, 徐渊 . ( 2017). 经验取样法在组织行为学中的应用. 心理科学进展, 25, (6), 943-954. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00943URL
[8]	Abbad G. D.S., &Carlotto M.S . ( 2016). Analyzing challenges associated with the adoption of longitudinal studies in work and organizational psychology. Revista Psicologia: Organizações e Trabalho, 16, (4), 340-348.
[9]	Barzi F., &Woodward M. ( 2004). Imputations of missing values in practice: Results from imputations of serum cholesterol in 28 cohort studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 160, (1), 34-45. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh175URLpmid: 15229115
[10]	Beal D. J., Trougakos J. P., Weiss H. M., & Dalal R. S . ( 2013). Affect spin and the emotion regulation process at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, (4), 593-605. doi: 10.1037/a0032559URLpmid: 23565893
[11]	Bergström J., Miller M., & Horneij E . ( 2015). Work environment perceptions following relocation to open-plan offices: A twelve-month longitudinal study. Work, 50, (2), 221-228. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131798URLpmid: 24284691
[12]	Birkeland M. S., Nielsen M. B., Hansen M. B., Knardahl S., & Heir T . ( 2017). The impact of a workplace terrorist attack on employees' perceptions of leadership: A longitudinal study from pre- to postdisaster. Leadership Quarterly, 28, 5), 659-671. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.01.002URL
[13]	Bliese P. D., Chan D., & Ployhart R. E . ( 2007). Multilevel methods: Future directions in measurement, longitudinal analyses, and nonnormal outcomes. Organizational Research Methods, 10, (4), 551-563. doi: 10.1177/1094428107301102URL
[14]	Chan D .( 1998). The conceptualization and analysis of change over time: An integrative approach incorporating longitudinal mean and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). Organizational Research Methods, 1, 4), 421- 483. doi: 10.1177/109442819814004URL
[15]	de Jong T., Wiezer N., de Weerd M., Nielsen K., Mattila-Holappa P., & Mockałło Z . ( 2016). The impact of restructuring on employee well-being: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Work & Stress, An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations, 30, (1), 91-114. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2015.1136710URL
[16]	, Fraley R.C., &Hudson N.W . ( 2014). Review of intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Journal of Social Psychology, 154, (1), 89-91. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2013.831300URL
[17]	Gao-Urhahn X., Biemann T., & Jaros S. J . ( 2016). How affective commitment to the organization changes over time: A longitudinal analysis of the reciprocal relationships between affective organizational commitment and income. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, (4), 515-536. doi: 10.1002/job.2088URL
[18]	Goh Z., Ilies R., & Wilson K. S . ( 2015). Supportive supervisors improve employees’ daily lives: The role supervisors play in the impact of daily workload on life satisfaction via work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 89, 65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.04.009URL
[19]	Harju L. K., Hakanen J. J., & Schaufeli W. B . ( 2016). Can job crafting reduce job boredom and increase work engagement? A three-year cross-lagged panel study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95-96, 11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2016.07.001URL
[20]	Howardson G. N., Karim M. N., & Horn R. G . ( 2017). The latent change score model: A more flexible approach to modeling time in self-regulated learning. Journal of Business & Psychology, 32, (3), 317-334. doi: 10.1007/s10869-016-9475-4URL
[21]	Jebb A.T., &Tay L. ( 2016). Introduction to time series analysis for organizational research: Methods for longitudinal analyses. Organizational Research Methods, 20, (1), 61-94.
[22]	Kam C., Morin A. J. S., Meyer J. P., & Topolnytsky L . ( 2016). Are commitment profiles stable and predictable? A latent transition analysis. Journal of Management, 42, (6), 1462-1490. doi: 10.1177/0149206313503010URL
[23]	Kelloway E.K., &Francis L. ( 2013). Longitudinal research and data analysis. In R. R. Sinclair, M. Wang, & L. E. Tetrick,, Eds.), Research methods in occupational health psychology: Measurement, design, and data analysis
[24]	Law K. S., Wong C-S., Yan M., & Huang G . ( 2016). Asian researchers should be more critical: The example of testing mediators using time-lagged data. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33, (2), 319-341. doi: 10.1007/s10490-015-9453-9URL
[25]	Lang J., Bliese P. D., Lang J. W., & Adler A. B . ( 2011). Work gets unfair for the depressed: Cross-lagged relations between organizational justice perceptions and depressive symptoms. Journal of Business & Psychology, 96, (3), 602-618. doi: 10.1037/a0022463URLpmid: 21299270
[26]	Lang J. W. B., Bliese P. D., & de Voogt A . ( 2018). Modeling consensus emergence in groups using longitudinal multilevel methods. Personnel Psychology, 71, 2), 255-281. doi: 10.1111/peps.12260URL
[27]	Levin K.A . ( 2006). Study design iii: Cross-sectional studies. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 7(1), 24-25. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400375
[28]	Li W. D., Fay D., Frese M., Harms P. D., & Gao X. Y . ( 2014). Reciprocal relationship between proactive personality and work characteristics: A latent change score approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, (5), 948-965. doi: 10.1037/a0036169URLpmid: 24635530
[29]	Liu S., Wang M., Bamberger P., Shi J., & Bacharach S. B. .( 2015). The dark side of socialization: A longitudinal investigation of newcomer alcohol use. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 58(2), 334-355.
[30]	Liu Y., Wang M., Chang C. H., Shi J., Zhou L., & Shao R . ( 2015). Work-family conflict, emotional exhaustion, and displaced aggression toward others: The moderating roles of workplace interpersonal conflict and perceived managerial family support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, (3), 793-808. doi: 10.1037/a0038387URLpmid: 25528246
[31]	McArdle J.J . ( 2001). A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic structural analysis. In R. Cudeck, S. Du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future( pp. 342-380). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
[32]	Mcardle J.J . ( 2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, (1), 577-605. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612URLpmid: 18817479
[33]	Miles J.A . ( 2012). Management and organization theory: A Jossey-Bass reader. Jossey-Bass.
[34]	[ 杰弗里·A·迈尔斯 . ( 2017). 管理与组织研究必读的40个理论 (徐世勇, 李超平等译). 北京: 北京大学出版社.]
[35]	Moazami-Goodarzi A., Nurmi J-E., Mauno S., & Rantanen J . ( 2015). Cross-lagged relations between work-family enrichment, vigor at work, and core self-evaluations: A three-wave study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30, (3), 473-482. doi: 10.1007/s10869-014-9376-3URL
[36]	Ng T. W.H., &Feldman D.C . ( 2015). The moderating effects of age in the relationships of job autonomy to work outcomes. Work Aging & Retirement, 1, (1), 64-78. doi: 10.1093/workar/wau003URL
[37]	Ployhart R.E., &Ward A-K. ( 2011). The “quick start guide” for conducting and publishing longitudinal research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, (4), 413-422. doi: 10.1007/s10869-011-9209-6URL
[38]	Ployhart R.E., &Vandenberg R.J . ( 2010). Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of Management, 36, (1), 94-120. doi: 10.1177/0149206309352110URL
[39]	Pitariu A.H., &Ployhart R.E . ( 2010). Explaining change: Theorizing and testing dynamic mediated longitudinal relationships. Journal of Management, 36, (2), 405-429. doi: 10.1177/0149206308331096
[40]	Rindfleisch A., Malter A. J., Ganesan S., & Moorman C . ( 2008). Cross-sectional versus longitudinal survey research: Concepts, findings, and guidelines. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, (3), 261-279.
[41]	Riza S. D., Ganzach Y., & Liu Y . ( 2016). Time and job satisfaction: A longitudinal study of the differential roles of age and tenure. Journal of Management, 44, (7), 2558-2579.
[42]	Taris T.W., &Kompier M. ( 2014). Cause and effect: Optimizing the designs of longitudinal studies in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 28, (1), 1-8. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2014.878494URL
[43]	Taylor S. G., Bedeian A. G., Cole M. S., & Zhang Z . ( 2017). Developing and testing a dynamic model of workplace incivility change. Journal of Management, 43, (3), 645-670. doi: 10.1177/0149206314535432URL
[44]	Tims M., Bakker A. B., & Derks D . ( 2015). Job crafting and job performance: A longitudinal study. EuropeanJournal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, (6), 914-928. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2014.969245URL
[45]	Vogt K., Hakanen J. J., Brauchli R., Jenny G. J., & Bauer G. F . ( 2016). The consequences of job crafting: A three- wave study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25, (3), 353-362. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2015.1072170URL
[46]	Winkler E., Busch C., Clasen J., & Vowinkel J . ( 2015). Changes in leadership behaviors predict changes in job satisfaction and well-being in low-skilled workers: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22, (1), 72-87. doi: 10.1177/1548051814527771URL
[47]	Wu C.-H., &Griffin M.A . ( 2012). Longitudinal relationships between core self-evaluations and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, (2), 331-342. doi: 10.1037/a0025673URLpmid: 21942408
[48]	Zablah A. R., Carlson B. D., Donavan D. T., Maxham J. G., & Brown T. J . ( 2016). A cross-lagged test of the association between customer satisfaction and employee job satisfaction in a relational context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, (5), 743-755. doi: 10.1037/apl0000079URLpmid: 26783827

相关文章 14

[1]	王碧英, 高日光, 舒夏俊. 职场地位:多面性及其动态影响机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(6): 904-923.
[2]	李超平, 毛凯贤. 服务型领导影响工作繁荣的动态双向机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(10): 1734-1748.
[3]	张银普, 石伟, 骆南峰, 邢璐, 徐渊. 经验取样法在组织行为学中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(6): 943-954.
[4]	李腾飞, 陈光辉, 纪林芹, 张文新. 发展级联：解释个体纵向发展的新视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(6): 980-988.
[5]	陈明瑞;周萍. 成瘾物质使用的生态瞬时评估与干预[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(2): 247-252.
[6]	张银普;骆南峰;石伟. 经验取样法——一种收集“真实”数据的新方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(2): 305-316.
[7]	李超平;苏琴;宋照礼. 互动视角的组织社会化动态跟踪研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(3): 409-417.
[8]	唐文清;张敏强;黄宪;张嘉志;王旭. 加速追踪设计的方法和应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(2): 369-380.
[9]	叶素静;唐文清;张敏强;曹魏聪. 追踪研究中缺失数据处理方法及应用现状分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(12): 1985-1994.
[10]	王碧英;高日光. 中国组织情境下公仆型领导有效性的追踪研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(10): 1532-1542.
[11]	段锦云;陈文平. 基于动态评估的取样法：经验取样法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(7): 1110-1120.
[12]	叶宝娟;温忠麟;陈启山. 追踪研究中测验信度的估计[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(3): 467-474.
[13]	刘红云. 如何描述发展趋势的差异：潜变量混合增长模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2007, 15(3): 539-544.
[14]	刘红云，孟庆茂. 纵向数据分析方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2003, 11(5): 586-592.

PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4651