删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

社会分类的特性,维度及心理效应

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

佐斌1, 温芳芳1(), 宋静静2, 代涛涛1
1 华中师范大学心理学院暨社会心理研究中心, 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430079
2 中国地质大学应用心理研究所, 武汉 430070
收稿日期:2017-10-18出版日期:2019-01-15发布日期:2018-11-23


基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金项目(31571147);国家社科基金重大项目(18ZDA331);国家社科基金青年项目(13CSJ 078);华中师范大学中央基本科研业务费重大培育项目(CCNU18ZDPY12)资助

The characteristics, dimensions and psychological effect of social categorization

ZUO Bin1, WEN Fangfang1(), SONG Jingjing2, DAI Taotao1
1 School of Psychology, Center for Studies of Social Psychology, Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
2 Institute of Applied Psychology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430070, China
Received:2017-10-18Online:2019-01-15Published:2018-11-23







摘要/Abstract


摘要: 社会分类是个体基于共享相似性将人群分为不同类别的一种主观心理过程, 具有自动化,灵活性和潜在模糊性等特性.社会分类的维度既包括性别,年龄和种族等自然线索, 也包括语言,职业和社会身份等重要社会线索.在社会分类过程中, 不同维度往往具有相对重要性, 表现为优势维度效应; 不同维度相互之间也会发生作用, 产生交叉分类效应, 研究者从不同的视角对这种交叉分类效应进行了解释.未来研究应该采用多样化的方法和技术从分类主体,分类目标,分类情境以及社会文化因素等多角度探讨社会分类的心理加工机制, 构建更具整合性的社会分类理论模型.


1 侯志瑾, 梁湘明 . (2005). Gottfredson的职业抱负发展理论简介与研究评述. 心理科学进展,13(2), 201-210.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2005.02.010URL
2 黎情, 佐斌, 胡聚平 . (2009). 群体交叉分类效应的代数模型及其潜在加工过程. 心理科学进展,17(4), 863-869.
3 辛自强, 辛素飞 . (2014). 被信任者社会身份复杂性对其可信性的影响. 心理学报,46(3), 415-426.
4 张凯莉, 张琴, 周静, 王沛 . (2017). 面孔识别过程中多重社会亚范畴的交互作用. 心理科学进展,25(11), 1955-1963.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01955URL
5 佐斌, 代涛涛, 温芳芳, 索玉贤 . (2015). 社会认知内容的“大二”模型. 心理科学, 38(4), 1019-1023.
6 Bar-Haim Y., Ziv T., Lamy D., & Hodes R . (2006). Nature and nurture in own-race face processing. Psychological Science, 17(2), 159-163.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01679.xURLpmid: 16466424
7 Baron A.S., &Banaji M.R . (2006). The development of implicit attitudes. evidence of race evaluations from ages 6 and 10 and adulthood. Psychological Science,17(1), 53-58.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01664.xURLpmid: 16371144
8 Bjornsdottir R.T., &Rule N.O . (2017). The visibility of social class from facial cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(4), 1-17.
doi: 10.1037/pspa0000091URLpmid: 28557470
9 Bodenhausen G. V., Kang S. K., & Peery D . (2012). Social categorization and the perception of social groups. In S. Fiske & C. N. Macrae (Eds.),The SAGE handbook of social cognition (pp. 311-329). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
10 Correll J., Park B., Judd C. M., Wittenbrink B., Sadler M. S., & Keesee T . (2007). Across the thin blue line: Police offers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1006-1023.
11 Crisp R.J., & Hewstone M. (2007). Multiple social categorization. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 163-254.
12 Crisp R.J., &Turner R.N . (2010). Have confidence in contact. American Psychologist, 65(2), 133-135.
13 Deaux K. . (2012). Categories we live by. In S. Wiley, G. Philogène, & T. A. Revenson (Eds.),(2012). Social categories in everyday experience.,
14 Diesendruck G., Goldfein‐Elbaz R., Rhodes M., Gelman S., & Neumark N . (2013). Cross‐cultural differences in children's beliefs about the objectivity of social categories. Child Development, 84(6), 1906-1917.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.12108URLpmid: 3714352
15 Donders N. C., Correll J., & Wittenbrink B . (2008). Danger stereotypes predict racially biased attentional allocation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1328-1333.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.002URL
16 Dovidio J. F., Love A., Schellhaas F. M., & Hewstone M . (2017). Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 606-620.
17 Dragojevic M., Berglund C., & Blauvelt T. K . (2017). Figuring out who’s who: The role of social categorization in the language attitudes process. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(1), 28-50.
18 Efferson C., Lalive R., & Fehr E . (2008). The coevolution of cultural groups and ingroup favoritism. Science, 321(5897), 1844-1849.
doi: 10.1126/science.1155805URLpmid: 18818361
19 Eidson R.C., &Coley J.D . (2014). Not so fast: Reassessing gender essentialism in young adults. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(2), 382-392.
doi: 10.1080/15248372.2013.763810URL
20 Freeman, J. B. & Ambady N. (2011). A dynamic interactive theory of persons construal. Psychological Review, 118(2), 247-279.
doi: 10.1037/a0022327URLpmid: 21355661
21 Ghaziani A., Taylor V., & Stone A . (2016). Cycles of sameness and difference in LGBT social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 42, 165-183.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112352URL
22 Gillespie A., Howarth C. S., & Cornish F . (2012). Four problems for researchers using social categories. Culture & Psychology, 18(3), 391-402.
23 Hampton J.A . (1987). Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions. Memory & Cognition, 15(1), 55-71.
doi: 10.3758/bf03197712URL
24 Hogg M. A., Abrams D., & Brewer M. B . (2017). Social identity: The role of self in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 570-581
25 Horwitz S. R., Shutts K., & Olson K. R . (2014). Social class differences produce social group preferences. Developmental Science, 17(6), 991-1002.
doi: 10.1111/desc.12181URLpmid: 24702971
26 Kang S.K., &Chasteen A.L . (2009). Beyond the double- jeopardy hypothesis: Assessing emotion on the faces of multiply-categorizable targets of prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(6), 1281-1285.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.002URL
27 Kang S. K., Chasteen A. L., Cadieux J., Cary L. A., & Syeda M . (2014). Comparing young and older adults’ perceptions of conflicting stereotypes and multiply- categorizable individuals. Psychology and Aging, 29(3), 469-481.
doi: 10.1037/a0037551URLpmid: 25244468
28 Kawakami K., Amodio D. M., & Hugenberg K . (2017). Chapter one - Intergroup perception and cognition: An integrative framework for understanding the causes and consequences of social categorization. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 41-48.
29 Kinzler K.D., &Spelke E.S . (2011). Do infants show social preferences for people differing in race? Cognition, 119(1), 1-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.019URLpmid: 3081609
30 Kinzler K. D., Shutts K., & Correll J . (2010). Priorities in social categories. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 581-592.
31 Kinzler K. D., Shutts K., DeJesus J., & Spelke E. S . (2009). Accent trumps race in guiding children’s social preferences. Social Cognition, 27(4), 623-634.
doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.623URLpmid: 21603154
32 Klapper A., Dotsch R., van Rooij I., & Wigboldus D . (2017). Four meanings of “categorization”: A conceptual analysis of research on person perception. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(8), e12336.
doi: 10.1111/spc3.12336URL
33 Labov, W. (2006). The social stratification of English in New York City (2nd ed.), New York: Cambridge University Press.
34 Locke K.D., & Heller S. (2017). Communal and agentic interpersonal and intergroup motives predict preferences for status versus power. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 71-86.
doi: 10.1177/0146167216675333URLpmid: 28903646
35 Nicolas G., de la Fuente M., & Fiske S. T . (2017). Mind the overlap in multiple categorization: A review of crossed categorization, intersectionality, and multiracial perception. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 621-631.
36 Nosek B. A., Greenwald A. G. , & Banaji, M. R.(2007) . The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review In J A Bargh (Ed), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of mental processes (pp 265-292) New York: Psychology Press A methodological and conceptual review. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of mental processes (pp. 265-292) . New York: Psychology Press.
37 Pedulla D.S . (2014). The positive consequences of negative stereotypes: Race, sexual orientation, and the job application process. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(1), 75-94.
doi: 10.1177/0190272513506229URL
38 Philogène G. . (2012). Understanding social categories: An epistemological journey. In S. Wiley, G. Philogène, T. A. Revenson,(Eds).
doi: 10.1037/13488-002URL
39 Prati F., Crisp R. J., & Rubini M . (2015). Counter- stereotypes reduce emotional intergroup bias by eliciting surprise in the face of unexpected category combinations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 31-43.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.06.004URL
40 Rozendal K. . (2003). The effects of choice over category membership on social category compound dominance (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of. California.
41 Rule N.O., &Sutherland S.L . (2017). Social categorization from faces: Evidence from obvious and ambiguous groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(3), 231-236.
42 Shutts K. . (2015). Young children's preferences: Gender, race, and social status. Child Development Perspectives, 9(4), 262-266.
doi: 10.1111/cdep.12154URL
43 Shutts K., Brey E. L., Dornbusch L. A., Slywotzky N., & Olson K. R . (2016). Children use wealth cues to evaluate others. PLoS ONE, 11(3), e0149360.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149360URLpmid: 4774995
44 Shutts K., Roben C. K. P., & Spelke E. S . (2013). Children's use of social categories in thinking about people and social relationships. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(1), 35-62.
doi: 10.1080/15248372.2011.638686URLpmid: 23646000
45 Smyth K., Feeney A., Eidson R. C., & Coley J. D . (2017). Development of essentialist thinking about religion categories in Northern Ireland (and the United States). Developmental Psychology, 53(3), 475-496.
doi: 10.1037/dev0000253URLpmid: 28230403
46 Smallman R., & Becker B. (2017). Motivational differences in seeking out evaluative categorization information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(7), 1020-1032.
doi: 10.1177/0146167217704191URLpmid: 28903700
47 Song J., & Zuo B. (2016). Functional significance of conflicting age and wealth cross-categorization: The dominant role of categories that violate stereotypical expectations. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1624.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01624URLpmid: 27818640
48 Weisman K., Johnson M. V., & Shutts K . (2015). Young children’s automatic encoding of social categories. Developmental Science, 18(6), 1036-1043.
doi: 10.1111/desc.12269URLpmid: 4476957
49 Williams D. R., Priest N., & Anderson N. B . (2016). Understanding associations among race, socioeconomic status, and health: Patterns and prospects. Health Psychology, 35(4), 407-411.
doi: 10.1037/hea0000242URLpmid: 27018733




[1]严磊, 佐斌, 张艳红, 吴漾, 杨林川. 交叉分类及其对刻板印象的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(7): 1272-1283.
[2]党宝宝;高承海;杨阳;万明钢. 群际威胁:影响因素与减少策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(4): 711-720.
[3]张晓斌;佐斌;薛孟杰;江汶;候飞翔. 基于鼠标追踪技术的个体建构过程实时测量[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(5): 770-781.
[4]佐斌;张晓斌. 类别学习和分类运用的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(6): 843-852.
[5]黎情;佐斌;胡聚平. 群体交叉分类效应的代数模型及其潜在加工过程[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(4): 863-869.
[6]兰玉娟;佐斌. 去个性化效应的社会认同模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(2): 467-472.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4574
相关话题/心理 社会 科学 过程 华中师范大学