![](http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/images/email.png)
中央财经大学社会与心理学院心理学系, 北京 100081
收稿日期:
2018-04-28出版日期:
2019-07-15发布日期:
2019-05-22通讯作者:
傅鑫媛E-mail:fuxinyuan@cufe.edu.cn基金资助:
* 北京市社会科学基金青年项目(17JYC017);北京市教育科学“十三五”规划2018年度青年专项课题(BCEA18049);中央财经大学中央基本科研业务费青蓝科研团队项目支持Social class signs and their effects on interpersonal social interactions
GUO Rong, FU Xinyuan(![](http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/images/email.png)
Department of Psychology at School of Sociology and Psychology, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China
Received:
2018-04-28Online:
2019-07-15Published:
2019-05-22Contact:
FU Xinyuan E-mail:fuxinyuan@cufe.edu.cn摘要/Abstract
摘要: 社会阶层信号是指个体据以感知和判断他人社会阶层的一切线索, 人们通过加工这些微妙的线索便能判断出他人的社会阶层, 而他人的社会阶层在很大程度上决定着人们在人际水平的社会互动行为。以穿着打扮、面部特征和说话特点为例, 说明社会阶层信号对个体判断他人阶层的影响, 在此基础上围绕社会交换、社会公平和社会认同这三个动机视角归纳了社会阶层信号对人际水平社会互动的不同影响。针对社会阶层信号本身, 将来有必要探讨社会阶层信号功能弱化的问题; 由于社会阶层信号与社会阶层这一概念的相关度较高, 未来研究有必要阐述二者的联系与区别; 鉴于目前少有研究考察第三方的社会阶层信号如何影响人际水平社会互动的问题, 探索互动中第三方社会阶层信号的影响及其机制将会是对社会阶层心理学研究的一个重要推进。
参考文献 42
[1] | 程淑华, 李欣, 韩毅初 . (2017). 群际接触对外群体信任的影响:内群体认同的中介效应. 心理学探新, 37(1), 54-58. |
[2] | 蔡頠, 吴嵩, 寇彧 . (2016). 权力对亲社会行为的影响:机制及相关因素. 心理科学进展, 24(1), 120-132. |
[3] | 郭永玉, 杨沈龙, 李静, 胡小勇 . (2015). 社会阶层心理学视角下的公平研究. 心理科学进展, 23(8), 1299-1311. |
[4] | 杭斌, 修磊 . (2016). 收入不平等、信贷约束与家庭消费. 统计研究, 33(8), 73-79. |
[5] | 胡荣, 陈斯诗 . (2008). 时尚消费的符号意义与社会阶层建构. 社会科学研究, (6), 110-114. |
[6] | 李春玲 . (2017). “中产化”:中国社会阶层结构变化新趋势. 人民论坛, (22), 1-1. |
[7] | 陆学艺 . (2002). 当代中国社会阶层研究报告. 社会科学文献出版社. |
[8] | 王春晓, 朱虹 . (2016). 地位焦虑、物质主义与炫耀性消费——中国人物质主义倾向的现状、前因及后果. 北京社会科学, (5), 31-40. |
[9] | 徐凤娇 . (2016). 亲社会行为的阶层差异:施与受的双重视角(硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学. |
[10] | 郑杭生 . (2002). 我国社会阶层结构新变化的几个问题. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 41(4), 5-9. |
[11] | 郑杭生 . (2005). 透视当代社会结构促进中国社会和谐. 中国人民大学学报, 19(2), 1-8. |
[12] | Abbate C. S., Ruggieri S., & Boca S . (2013). The effect of prosocial priming in the presence of bystanders. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(5), 619-622. |
[13] | Bar-Anan Y., Trope Y., Liberman N., & Algom D . (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 610-622. |
[14] | Bergeron A. P., & Zanna M. P . (1973). Group membership and belief similarity as determinants of interpersonal attraction in Peru. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4(4), 397-411. doi: 10.1177/002202217300400402URL |
[15] | Bjornsdottir R. T., & Rule N. O . (2017). The visibility of social class from facial cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(4), 530-546. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000091URL |
[16] | Cao Y., Yu H., Wu Y., & Zhou X . (2015). Can money heal all wounds? Social exchange norm modulates the preference for monetary versus social compensation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1411-1421. |
[17] | Cappelen A. W., Eichele T., Hugdahl K., Specht K., Sørensen E. Ø., & Tungodden B . (2014). Equity theory and fair inequality: A neuroeconomic study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(43), 15368-15372. |
[18] | Clingingsmith D., & Sheremeta R. M . (2018). Status and the demand for visible goods: Experimental evidence on conspicuous consumption. Experimental Economics, 21(4), 877-904. |
[19] | DeCelles K. A., & Norton M. I . (2016). Physical and situational inequality on airplanes predicts air rage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(20), 5588-5591. |
[20] | Diener E., & Biswas-Diener R. , (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being?. Social Indicators Research, 57(2), 119-169. doi: 10.1023/A:1014411319119URL |
[21] | Evans J. S . (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review Psychology, 59, 255-278. |
[22] | Fussell P . (1983). Class: A guide through the American status system. New York: Summit Books. |
[23] | Giles H., & Sassoon C. , (1983). The effect of speaker's accent, social class background and message style on British listeners' social judgements. Language & Communication, 3(3), 305-313. |
[24] | Gillath O., Bahns A. J., Ge F., & Crandall C. S . (2012). Shoes as a source of first impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(4), 423-430. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.04.003URL |
[25] | Haslam S. A . (2014). Making good theory practical: Five lessons for an applied social identity approach to challenges of organizational, health, and clinical psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 1-20. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12061URL |
[26] | Haushofer J., & Fehr E. , (2014). On the psychology of poverty. Science, 344(6186), 862-867. doi: 10.1126/science.1232491URL |
[27] | Kraus M. W., & Keltner D. , (2009). Signs of socioeconomic status: A thin-slicing approach. Psychological Science, 20(1), 99-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02251.xURL |
[28] | Kraus M. W., & Mendes W. B . (2014). Sartorial symbols of social class elicit class-consistent behavioral and physiological responses: A dyadic approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(6), 2330-2340. |
[29] | Kraus M. W., & Stephens N. M . (2012). A road map for an emerging psychology of social class. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 6(9), 642-656. |
[30] | Kraus M. W., Horberg E. J., Goetz J. L., & Keltner D . (2011). Social class rank, threat vigilance, and hostile reactivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(10), 1376-1388. |
[31] | Kraus M. W., Park J. W., & Tan J. J. X ., (2017). Signs of social class: The experience of economic inequality in everyday life. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(3), 422-435. doi: 10.1177/1745691616673192URL |
[32] | Kuppens T., Spears R., Manstead A. S. R., Spruyt B., & Easterbrook M. J . (2018). Educationism and the irony of meritocracy: Negative attitudes of higher educated people towards the less educated. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 429-447. |
[33] | Leventhal G. S. .(1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum Press. |
[34] | Makkar M. (2014). Luxury for oneself or luxury for others? Exploring the underlying emotions behind inconspicuous luxury consumption (Doctoral dissertation). Auckland University of Technology. |
[35] | Malatesta C. Z., Fiore M. J., & Messina J. J . (1987). Affect, personality, and facial expressive characteristics of older people. Psychology & Aging, 2(1), 64-69. |
[36] | Manstead A. S. R . (2018). The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 267-292. |
[37] | Navarro-Carrillo G., Valor-Segura I., & Moya M . (2018). Do you trust strangers, close acquaintances, and members of your ingroup? Differences in trust based on social class in Spain. Social Indicators Research, 135(2), 585-597. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1527-7URL |
[38] | Rivera L. A. (2016). Pedigree: How elite students get elite jobs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. |
[39] | Rivera L. A., & Tilcsik A. , (2016). Class advantage, commitment penalty: The gendered effect of social class signals in an elite labor market. American Sociological Review, 81(6), 1097-1131. doi: 10.1177/0003122416668154URL |
[40] | Schilke O., Reimann M., & Cook K. S . (2015). Power decreases trust in social exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(42), 12950-12955. |
[41] | Thomas K. A., de Freitas J., DeScioli P., & Pinker S . (2016). Recursive mentalizing and common knowledge in the bystander effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(5), 621-629. doi: 10.1037/xge0000153URL |
[42] | van Doesum N. J., Tybur J. M., & van Lange P. A. M ., (2017). Class impressions: Higher social class elicits lower prosociality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.001URL |
相关文章 15
[1] | 严秋斯, 隋杨, 郝雪晶. 亲组织不道德行为的解释机制与理论模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 338-352. |
[2] | 金杨华, 施荣荣, 谢江佩. 团队中帮助行为的多水平整合模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 167-177. |
[3] | 王碧英, 高日光, 舒夏俊. 职场地位:多面性及其动态影响机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(6): 904-923. |
[4] | 严磊, 佐斌, 张艳红, 吴漾, 杨林川. 交叉分类及其对刻板印象的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(7): 1272-1283. |
[5] | 王新月, 王兴超, 雷雳, 王鹏程, 周浩. 社交网站在社会认同发展中的作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(11): 2024-2034. |
[6] | 段锦云, 徐悦, 郁林瀚. 中国儒家传统中的自我修为思想:对交换范式的审视与补充[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(10): 1890-1900. |
[7] | 郭永玉;杨沈龙;李静;胡小勇. 社会阶层心理学视角下的公平研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(8): 1299-1311. |
[8] | 刘喆;梁娟;刘燕君;马红宇;刘腾飞;马露露;杨林川. 领导执行公正准则的理论基础及影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(7): 1258-1266. |
[9] | 王财玉. 消费者自我-品牌联结的内涵、形成机制及影响效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(5): 922-933. |
[10] | 辛素飞;明朗;辛自强. 群际信任的增进:社会认同与群际接触的方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(2): 290-299. |
[11] | 吴宝沛;朱小琴;张雷. 进化视角下的欺骗者探测:准确性和模块性[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(12): 2224-2234. |
[12] | 高承海;侯玲;吕超;万明钢. 内隐理论与群体关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(8): 1180-1188. |
[13] | 黎坚;李一茗. 爱的权衡:在付出与索取中保持或恢复心理衡平感[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(4): 598-607. |
[14] | 邹文篪;田青;刘佳. “投桃报李”—— 互惠理论的组织行为学研究述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(11): 1879-1888. |
[15] | 陈浩;薛婷;乐国安. 工具理性、社会认同与群体愤怒—— 集体行动的社会心理学研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(1): 127-136. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4731