删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

直播营销中社会临场感对线上从众消费的影响及作用机理研究——行为与神经生理视角

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

谢莹1, 李纯青1(), 高鹏1, 刘艺2
1 西北大学经济管理学院, 西安 710127
2 西安财经大学商学院, 西安 710100
收稿日期:2018-10-16出版日期:2019-06-15发布日期:2019-04-24
通讯作者:李纯青E-mail:lichunqing@nwu.edu.cn

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目“直播营销中社会临场感对线上从众消费的影响及作用机理研究——行为与神经生理视角”(71802158);陕西省社会科学基金项目“直播营销情境下的从众行为研究”(2018S42);陕西省自然科学基金项目“隐性知识传递与企业创新——基于认知视角的实验研究”(2014JM9370);陕西省教育厅专项科研计划项目(18JK0760)

The effect and mechanism of social presence in live marketing on online herd consumption from behavioral and neurophysiological perspectives

XIE Ying1, LI Chunqing1(), GAO Peng1, LIU Yi2
1 School of Economics and Management, Northwest University, Xi’an, 710027, China;
2 School of Business XI’AN University of Finance and Economics, Xi’an, 710100, China;
Received:2018-10-16Online:2019-06-15Published:2019-04-24
Contact:LI Chunqing E-mail:lichunqing@nwu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 研究以直播营销为背景, 引入产生于通讯领域的社会临场感概念, 在文献归纳分析的基础上首先探讨直播营销环境下社会临场感的内涵和构成; 之后基于从众消费理论通过行为实验的方法探究直播营销中社会临场感影响线上从众消费的认知机制; 进一步, 根据社会临场感理论探讨自我建构和消费者-主播关系强度在此过程中的调节作用; 最后基于社会助长理论, 利用神经科学方法客观性和“过程测量”的优势探索直播营销中社会临场感影响线上从众的情感机制。研究将揭示社会临场感影响线上从众消费行为的机理, 为直播播主和电商卖家提供指导的同时, 帮助消费者了解自我, 以做出更理性的消费决策。



图1研究框架
图1研究框架



图2研究1主要内容框架
图2研究1主要内容框架



图3研究2主要内容框架
图3研究2主要内容框架



图4研究3主要内容框架
图4研究3主要内容框架



图5研究4主要内容框架
图5研究4主要内容框架







1 戴维·迈尔斯. ( 2016). 社会心理学 (侯玉波, 乐国安, 张智勇等, 译). 人民邮电出版社.
2 郭海玲 . ( 2015). 好评返现对电子商务网购市场的影响及治理对策. 中国流通经济, ( 3), 42-48.
3 华勇 . ( 2017). 电商直播: 流量泡沫还是下一个风口? 销售与市场(管理版), ( 2), 64-67.
4 姜凌, 周庭锐, 王成璋 . ( 2009). 奢侈品牌消费中参照群体影响研究. 管理科学, 22( 5), 81-91.
5 孙彦, 李纾, 殷晓莉 . ( 2007). 决策与推理的双系统——启发式系统和分析系统. 心理科学进展, 15( 5), 721-726.
6 宋嘉莹, 王宁, 杨学成 . ( 2017). “好评返现”对用户感知评论真实性及购买意愿的影响. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 19( 3), 12-22.
7 伍秋萍, 冯聪, 陈斌斌 . ( 2011). 具身框架下的社会认知研究述评. 心理科学进展, 19( 3), 336-345.
8 赵宏霞, 王新海, 周宝刚 . ( 2015). B2C网络购物中在线互动及临场感与消费者信任研究. 管理评论, 27( 2), 43-54.
9 邹宇春, 赵延东 . ( 2017). 社会网络如何影响信任?——资源机制与交往机制. 社会科学战线, ( 5), 200-206.
10 Argo J. J., Dahl D. W., & Manchanda R. V . ( 2005). The influence of a mere social presence in a retail context. Journal of Consumer Research, 32( 2), 207-212.
doi: 10.1086/432230URL
11 Ariely, D., & Levav, J . ( 2000). Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. Journal of Consumer Research, 27( 3), 279-290.
doi: 10.1086/317585URL
12 Bapna R., Gupta A., Rice S., & Sundararajan A . ( 2017). Trust and the strength of ties in online social networks: An exploratory field experiment. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 41( 1), 115-130. doi: 10.25300/misq/2017/41.1.06
doi: 10.25300/MISQURL
13 Barsalou, L. W . ( 1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22( 4), 637-660. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x99532147
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99532147URL
14 Biocca, F. ( 2010). Virtual reality technology: A tutorial. Journal of Communication, 42( 4), 23-72.
15 Botha E., & Reyneke, M. . (2016). The influence of social presence on online purchase intention: An experiment with different product types. In: C. Campbell, J. Ma (Eds.), Looking forward, looking back: Drawing on the past to shape the future of marketing (pp. 180-183). Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham.
16 Brown, J. J., & Reingen, P. H . ( 1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14( 3), 350-362.
doi: 10.1086/jcr.1987.14.issue-3URL
17 Chang, C. M., & Hsu, M. H . ( 2016). Understanding the determinants of users’ subjective well-being in social networking sites: An integration of social capital theory and social presence theory. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35( 9), 720-729.
18 Chang E., Thomson P., Dillon T., & Hussain F . ( 2005). The fuzzy and dynamic nature of trust. Paper presented at the international conference on trust, privacy, and security in digital business.
19 Chatterjee P., Chollet B., & Trendel O . ( 2017). From conformity to reactance: Contingent role of network centrality in consumer-to-consumer influence. Journal of Business Research, 75, 86-94.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.02.012URL
20 Chen, Y. F . ( 2008). Herd behavior in purchasing books online. Computers in Human Behavior, 24( 5), 1977-1992.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.08.004URL
21 Chen M. L., Ma Q. G., Li M. L., Dai S. Y., Wang X. Y., & Shu L. C . ( 2010). The neural and psychological basis of herding in purchasing books online: An event-related potential study. Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 13( 3), 321-328.
22 Chen, Y. F., & Lu, H. F . ( 2014). We-commerce: Exploring factors influencing online group-buying intention in Taiwan from a conformity perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18( 1), 62-75.
23 Choi J., Lee H. J., & Kim Y. K . ( 2011). The influence of social presence on customer intention to reuse online recommender systems: The roles of personalization and product type. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16( 1), 129-154.
doi: 10.2753/JEC1086-4415160105URL
24 Cohen, J. B., & Golden, E . ( 1971). Informational social influence and product evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56( 1), 54-59.
25 Cross S. E., Hardin E. E., & Gercekswing B . ( 2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 15( 2), 142-179.
26 Debrot A., Schoebi D., Perrez M., & Horn A. B . ( 2013). Touch as an interpersonal emotion regulation process in couples' daily lives: The mediating role of psychological intimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39( 10), 1373-1385.
doi: 10.1177/0146167213497592URL
27 Dholakia U. M., Basuroy S., & Soltysinski K . ( 2002). Auction or agent (or both)? A study of moderators of the herding bias in digital auctions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19( 2), 115-130.
doi: 10.1016/S0167-8116(02)00064-2URL
28 Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W . ( 2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-products and e-services. Omega, 32( 6), 407-424.
doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2004.01.006URL
29 Greenleaf, E. A., & Lehmann, D. R . ( 1995). Reasons for substantial delay in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 22( 2), 186-199.
doi: 10.1086/jcr.1995.22.issue-2URL
30 Hanson, W. A., & Putler, D. S . ( 1996). Hits and misses: Herd behavior and online product popularity. Marketing Letters, 7( 4), 297-305.
doi: 10.1007/BF00435537URL
31 Hassanein, K., Head, M. ( 2007). Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65( 8), 689-709.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.018URL
32 Huang, J. H., & Chen, Y. F . ( 2006). Herding in online product choice. Psychology & Marketing, 23( 5), 413-428.
33 Jayasinghe, L., & Ritson, M . ( 2013). Everyday advertising context: An ethnography of advertising response in the family living room. Journal of Consumer Research, 40( 1), 104-121.
doi: 10.1086/668889URL
34 Keng C. J., Chang W. H., Chen C. H., & Chang Y. Y . ( 2016). Mere virtual presence with product experience affects brand attitude and purchase intention. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 44( 3), 431-444.
35 Kim, Y. H., & Cohen, D . ( 2010). Information, perspective, and judgments about the self in face and dignity cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36( 4), 537-550.
doi: 10.1177/0146167210362398URL
36 Klein, L. R . ( 2010). Creating virtual product experiences: The role of telepresence. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17( 1), 41-55.
37 Kurt D., Inman J. J., & Argo J. J . ( 2011). The influence of friends on consumer spending: The role of agency- communion orientation and self-monitoring. Journal of Marketing Research, 48( 4), 741-754.
doi: 10.1509/jmkr.48.4.741URL
38 Kushnir, T. J . ( 1981). The status of arousal in recent social facilitation literature: A review and evaluation of assumptions implied by the current research model. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 9( 2), 185-191.
39 Lalwani, A. K., & Shavitt, S . ( 2009). The "me" I claim to be: Cultural self-construal elicits self-presentational goal pursuit. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 97( 1), 88-102.
40 Lascu D. N., Bearden W. O., & Rose R. L . ( 1995). Norm extremity and interpersonal influences on consumer conformity. Journal of Business Research, 32( 3), 201-212.
doi: 10.1016/0148-2963(94)00046-HURL
41 Laurenceau J. P., Barrett L. F., & Pietromonaco P. R . ( 1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74( 5), 1238-1251.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1238URL
42 Lee, E. J., & Park, J . ( 2014). Enhancing virtual presence in E-Tail: Dynamics of cue multiplicity. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 18( 4), 117-146.
doi: 10.2753/JEC1086-4415180405URL
43 Lee, E. J., & Shin, S. Y . ( 2014). When do consumers buy online product reviews? Effects of review quality, product type, and reviewer’s photo. Computers in Human Behavior, 31( 1), 356-366.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.050URL
44 Lee, K. M., & Nass, C . ( 2005). Social-psychological origins of feelings of presence: Creating social presence with machine-generated voices. Media Psychology, 7( 1), 31-45.
doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0701_2URL
45 Li, Y. A., & Wang, Y . ( 2013). Social influence from personalized recommendations to trusting beliefs of websites: Intermediate role of social presence. In P. Kotze, G. Lindgaard, J. Wesson & M. Winckler (Eds.), Human- computer interaction - interact 2013, Pt Iii (Vol 8119, pp. 632-639). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin.
46 Lu B. Z., Fan W. G., & Zhou M . ( 2016). Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: An empirical research. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 225-237.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.057URL
47 Mehrebian, A., & Russell, J. A . ( 1977). Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions. Journal of Research in Personality, 11( 3), 273-294.
doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(77)90037-XURL
48 Mifune N., Hashimoto H., & Yamagishi T . ( 2010). Altruism toward in-group members as a reputation mechanism. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31( 2), 109-117.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.09.004URL
49 Mollen, A., & Wilson, H . ( 2010). Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: Reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 63( 9-10), 919-925.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.014URL
50 Muro, F. D., & Murray, K. B . ( 2012). An arousal regulation explanation of mood effects on consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39( 3), 574-584.
doi: 10.1086/664040URL
51 Nowak, K. L . ( 2013). Choosing buddy icons that look like me or represent my personality: Using buddy icons for social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29( 4), 1456-1464.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.027URL
52 O'Neill, R. M., & Lambert, D. R . ( 2001). The emotional side of price. Psychology & Marketing, 18( 3), 217-237.
53 Park E., Rishika R., Janakiraman R., Houston M. B., & Yoo B . ( 2018). Social dollars in online communities: The effect of product, user and network characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 82( 1), 93-114.
doi: 10.1509/jm.16.0271URL
54 Pozharliev R., Verbeke W. J. M. I., & Bagozzi R. P . ( 2017). Social consumer neuroscience: Neurophysiological measures of advertising effectiveness in a social context. Journal of Advertising 46( 3), 351-362.
55 Pozharliev R., Verbeke W. J. M. I., Strien J. W. V., & Bagozzi R. P . ( 2015). Merely being with you increases my attention to luxury products: Using EEG to understand consumers’ emotional experience of luxury branded products. Journal of Marketing Research, 52( 4), 546-558.
doi: 10.1509/jmr.13.0560URL
56 Quiamzade, A., & L'Huillier, J. P . ( 2009). Herding by attribution of privileged information. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22( 1), 1-19.
doi: 10.1002/bdm.v22:1URL
57 Ratner, Rebecca K., & Kahn, Barbara E . ( 2002). The impact of private versus public consumption on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 29( 2), 246-257.
doi: 10.1086/341574URL
58 Rosenberg, M. J . ( 1965). When dissonance fails: On eliminating evaluation apprehension from attitude measurement. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1( 1), 28-42.
59 Sharma S., Menard P., & Mutchler L. A . ( 2017). Who to trust? Applying trust to social commerce. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 59( 1), 32-42.
60 Shen, J. ( 2012). Social comparison, social presence, and enjoyment in the acceptance of social shopping websites. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13( 3), 198-212.
61 Shin, D. H., & Shin, Y. J . ( 2011). Consumers' trust in virtual mall shopping: The role of social presence and perceived security. International Journal of Humana Computer Interaction, 27( 5), 450-475.
doi: 10.1080/10447318.2011.552060URL
62 Short J., Williams E., & Christie B . ( 1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Contemporary Sociology, 7( 1), 32-33.
63 Walters, A., & Long, M . ( 2012). The effect of food label cues on perceptions of quality and purchase intentions among high-involvement consumers with varying levels of nutrition knowledge. Journal of Nutrition Education & Behavior, 44( 4), 350-354.
64 Wang Q. Z., Yang Y., Wang Q., & Ma Q. G . ( 2014). The effect of human image in B2C website design: An eye- tracking study. Enterprise Information Systems, 8( 5), 582-605.
doi: 10.1080/17517575.2014.925585URL
65 White, K., & Argo, J. J . ( 2011). When imitation doesn’t flatter: The role of consumer distinctiveness in responses to mimicry. Journal of Consumer Research, 38( 4), 667-680.
doi: 10.1086/660187URL
66 Worringham, C. J., & Messick, D. M . ( 1983). Social facilitation of running: An unobtrusive study. Journal of Social Psychology, 121( 1), 23-29.
doi: 10.1080/00224545.1983.9924462URL
67 Xie Y., Chen M. L., Lai H. X., Zhang W. K., Zhao Z., & Mahmood A. C . ( 2016). Neural basis of two kinds of social influence: Obedience and conformity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10.
68 Yang, S., & Allenby, G. M . ( 2003). Modeling interdependent consumer preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 40( 3), 282-294.
doi: 10.1509/jmkr.40.3.282.19240URL
69 Zajonc, R. B . ( 1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149( 3681), 269-274.
doi: 10.1126/science.149.3681.269URL
70 Huang Z. W., Liu L., Zheng W. W., Tan X. Y., & Zhao X . ( 2015). Walking the straight and narrow: The moderating effect of evaluation apprehension on the relationship between collectivism and corruption. PlosOne, 10( 3), e0123859.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123859URL




[1]谢志鹏, 肖婷婷, 秦环宇. 文字的“偷心术”:营销中的字体效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 365-380.
[2]谢志鹏, 赵晶, 汪涛. 消费者一定偏爱“笑脸”吗?产品外观中的表情元素对消费者的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(8): 1256-1272.
[3]尹倩兰, 陈艾彬, 邓光辉. 体像障碍的认知机制及治疗[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(2): 275-283.
[4]马原啸, 陈旭. 非安全依恋可塑性的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(12): 1967-1979.
[5]吴莹皓, 蒋晶. 数字效应对消费者行为的影响及其心理机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(9): 1680-1688.
[6]魏华, 段海岑, 周宗奎. 具身认知视角下的消费者行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(7): 1294-1306.
[7]严瑜, 衷敬红. 职场网络不文明行为:现实与虚拟的溢出和反溢出机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(12): 2204-2215.
[8]杨伟星;张明亮;李红霞;杨雅琳;司继伟. 人类基本数学能力的进化证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(5): 810-824.
[9]郭丰波;张振;原胜;敬一鸣;王益文. 自恋型人格的理论模型与神经生理机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(8): 1246-1256.
[10]郝亚楠;宋勃东;王岩;张钦;郎越. 气质性乐观的正性偏向及其神经生理研究证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(6): 946-957.
[11]黄俊;李晔;张宏伟. 解释水平理论的应用及发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(1): 110-119.
[12]钟歆;陈旭. 不同依恋风格者对情绪面孔的加工[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(12): 2154-2163.
[13]郝洪达;王詠. 内隐联想测验与消费心理[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(10): 1865-1873.
[14]何佳讯. 消费者研究:存在主义现象学方法论与应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(5): 729-736.
[15]许晓勇,吕建红,陈毅文. 品牌形象的消费行为学研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2003, 11(4): 464-468.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4714
相关话题/心理 科学 社会 营销 神经

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 多维范式下神经组织行为学的哲学基础、理论框架和研究方法
    刘玉新1(),陈晨1,朱楠1,季正21对外经济贸易大学国际商学院2对外经济贸易大学保险学院,北京100029收稿日期:2018-07-10出版日期:2019-06-15发布日期:2019-04-22通讯作者:刘玉新E-mail:liuyx21@263.net基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(71373 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 内疚与亲社会行为的关系:来自元分析的证据
    汤明,李伟强,刘福会,袁博()宁波大学心理学系暨研究所,浙江宁波315211收稿日期:2018-05-18出版日期:2019-05-15发布日期:2019-03-20通讯作者:袁博E-mail:yuanbopsy@gmail.com基金资助:*国家自然科学基金(31600914);教育部人文社会科学 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 垂体后叶加压素对人类社会行为的影响
    吴小燕1,2,封春亮2,徐家华4,何振宏5,罗艺6,罗跃嘉1,2,3()1深圳大学脑疾病与认知科学研究中心2深圳市情绪与社会认知科学重点实验室3深圳市神经科学研究院情绪与大脑中心,深圳5180604北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,北京1008755DivisionofNeuroscie ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 风险决策的概率权重偏差:心理机制与优化策略
    孙庆洲,邬青渊,张静,江程铭,赵雷,胡凤培()浙江工业大学管理学院,杭州310023收稿日期:2018-08-23出版日期:2019-05-15发布日期:2019-03-20通讯作者:胡凤培E-mail:fengpei@zjut.edu.cn基金资助:*教育部人文社科青年基金项目(18YJC6301 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 从动作模仿到社会认知:自我-他人控制的作用
    王协顺,苏彦捷()北京大学心理与认知科学学院,行为与心理健康北京市重点实验室,北京100871收稿日期:2018-10-17出版日期:2019-04-15发布日期:2019-02-22通讯作者:苏彦捷E-mail:yjsu@pku.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(31571134);国 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 不道德传染的心理机制及其影响
    王悦1,龚园超1,2,3,李莹1()1郑州大学教育学院,郑州4500012中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室,北京1001013中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049收稿日期:2018-06-05出版日期:2019-04-15发布日期:2019-02-22通讯作者:李莹E-mail:liyin ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 善因营销对消费者态度的影响及其理论解释
    骆紫薇1,2,吕林祥2()1暨南大学企业发展研究所2暨南大学管理学院,广州510632收稿日期:2018-05-10出版日期:2019-04-15发布日期:2019-02-22通讯作者:吕林祥E-mail:lvlinxiang@126.com基金资助:*国家自然科学基金青年项目(71602072); ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 揭秘经济管理中的行为异象:心理账户理论的应用启示
    刘培,冯一丹,李爱梅(),刘伟,谢健飞暨南大学管理学院广州510632收稿日期:2018-04-23出版日期:2019-03-15发布日期:2019-01-22通讯作者:李爱梅E-mail:tliaim@jnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(71271101);国家自然科学基金项目(7 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 行为社会政策:“助推”公共福利的实践与探索
    张书维,梁歆佚,岳经纶()中山大学中国公共管理研究中心、政治与公共事务管理学院,广州510275收稿日期:2018-04-03出版日期:2019-03-15发布日期:2019-01-22通讯作者:岳经纶E-mail:E-mail:klngok@126.com基金资助:国家社会科学基金青年项目资助(1 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 暴力视频游戏对个体亲社会性的影响:一项元分析
    邵嵘,滕召军,刘衍玲()西南大学心理健康教育研究中心,重庆400715收稿日期:2017-11-24出版日期:2019-03-15发布日期:2019-01-22通讯作者:刘衍玲E-mail:ssq@swu.edu.cn基金资助:国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“亲社会视频游戏对青少年亲社会行为的影响” ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01