删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

从动作模仿到社会认知:自我-他人控制的作用

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

王协顺, 苏彦捷()
北京大学心理与认知科学学院, 行为与心理健康北京市重点实验室, 北京 100871
收稿日期:2018-10-17出版日期:2019-04-15发布日期:2019-02-22
通讯作者:苏彦捷E-mail:yjsu@pku.edu.cn

基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金项目(31571134);国家自然科学基金项目(31872782)

From motor imitation to social cognition: The role of self-other control

WANG Xieshun, SU Yanjie()
School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Received:2018-10-17Online:2019-04-15Published:2019-02-22
Contact:SU Yanjie E-mail:yjsu@pku.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 在社会互动中, 人们具有自动模仿他人动作的倾向。尽管这种自动模仿有利于个体理解他人动作的感受, 但有时也会与自身的动作意图产生冲突。因此我们需要将自身动作意图与他人动作进行区分并调控二者之间的冲突。这种能力被称为自我-他人控制(self-other control, SOC)。与动作模仿控制相同, 心理理论、观点采择和共情等更高级的社会认知同样涉及对自我和他人信息的加工。很多证据表明, SOC可能是一种领域普遍的(domain-general)加工机制, 即在动作模仿控制和其他社会认知中, 大脑对自我和他人双方信息的区分和冲突调控共用同一套SOC系统。最近一些研究发现, 相比于抑制自身优势反应的抑制控制(inhibitory control), SOC是社会认知中一个更为关键的影响因素, 抑制控制对社会认知的作用受到SOC的调节。此外, SOC的领域普遍性提示我们, 未来可以通过简单的动作模仿控制训练, 来为社会认知受损个体(如孤独症和述情障碍者)进行康复训练。


[1] 黄翯青, 苏彦捷 . ( 2012). 共情的毕生发展:一个双过程的视角. 心理发展与教育, 28, (4), 434-441.
[2] 苏彦捷, 于晶 . ( 2015). 执行功能与心理理论关系的元分析:抑制控制和灵活转换的作用. 心理发展与教育, 31, (1), 610-617.
[3] Antonia F., & de Hamilton C. ( 2008). Emulation and mimicry for social interaction: A theoretical approach to imitation in autism. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, (1), 101-115. doi: 10.1080/ 17470210701508798
doi: 10.1080/17470210701508798URLpmid: 18038342
[4] Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwright S., Skinner R., Martin J., & Clubley E . ( 2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/High-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, (1), 5-17. doi: 10.1023/A:1005653411471
[5] Blakemore S.J., &Mills K.L . ( 2014). Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing? Annual review of psychology, 65, 187-207. doi: 10.1146/annurev- psych-010213-115202
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115202URLpmid: 24016274
[6] Benson J. E., Sabbagh M. A., Carlson S. M., & Zelazo P. D . ( 2013). Individual differences in executive functioning predict preschoolers’ improvement from theory-of-mind training. Developmental Psychology, 49, (9), 1615-1627. doi: 10.1037/a0031056
doi: 10.1037/a0031056URLpmid: 23244411
[7] Bird G., Leighton J., Press C., & Heyes C. .( 2007). Intact automatic imitation of human and robot actions in autism spectrum disorders. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1628), 3027-3031. doi: 10.1098/r spb.2007.1019
[8] Bradford E. E. F., Hukker V., Smith L., & Ferguson H. J . ( 2018). Belief-attribution in adults with and without autistic spectrum disorders. Autism Research, 11, (11), 1542-1553. doi: 10.1002/aur.2032
[9] Brass M., Bekkering H., Wohlschläger A., & Prinz W . ( 2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44, (2), 124-143. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2000.1225
[10] Brass M., Derrfuss J., & von Cramon D. Y . ( 2003). Imitative response tendencies in patients with frontal brain lesions. Neuropsychology, 17, (2), 265-271. doi: 10.1037/ 0894-4105.17.2.265
doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.17.2.265pmid: 12803432
[11] Brass M., Derrfuss J., & von Cramon D. Y . ( 2005). The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: A functional double dissociation. Neuropsychologia, 43, (1), 89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.018
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.018URLpmid: 15488909
[12] Brass M., &Heyes C. ( 2005). Imitation: Is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, (10), 489-495. doi: 10.1016/j.tics. 2005.08.007
[13] Brass M., Ruby P., & Spengler S . ( 2009). Inhibition of imitative behaviour and social cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal society B: Biological Sciences, 364, (1528), 2359-2367. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0066
[14] Brass M., Zysset S., & von Cramon D. Y . ( 2001). The inhibition of imitative response tendencies. Neuroimage, 14, (6), 1416-1423. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0944
doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0944URLpmid: 11707097
[15] Brown-Schmidt S .( 2009). The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, (5), 893-900. doi: 10. 3758/PBR.16.5.893
doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.893URLpmid: 19815795
[16] Butler E., Ward R., & Ramsey R . ( 2016). The influence of facial signals on the automatic imitation of hand actions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg. 2076.07653
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01653URLpmid: 5080362
[17] Casey B. J., Trainor R. J., Orendi J. L., Schubert A. B., Nystrom L. E., Giedd J. N., .. Rapoport J. L . ( 1997). A developmental functional MRI study of prefrontal activation during performance of a go-no-go task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, (6), 835-847. doi: 10.1162/ jocn.1997.9.6.835
[18] Caspers S., Zilles K., Laird A. R., & Eickhoff S. B . ( 2010). ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. Neuroimage, 50, (3), 1148-1167. doi: 10. 1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.112
[19] Castelli F., Frith C., Happé F., & Frith U . ( 2002). Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain, 125, (8), 1839-1849. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf189
[20] Conway J.R., Catmur C., &Bird G. ( 2019). Understanding individual differences in theory of mind via representation of minds, not mental states. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, in press. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1559-x
[21] de Guzman M., Bird G., Banissy M. J., & Catmur C . ( 2016). Self-other control processes in social cognition: From imitation to empathy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b-Biological Sciences, 371, (1686), 20150079-20150079. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0079
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0079URLpmid: 26644597
[22] Davis M.H . ( 1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
[23] Davis M.H . ( 1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, (1), 113-126. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
[24] Decety J., &Lamm C. ( 2007). The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: How low- level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. The Neuroscientist, 13, (6), 580-593. doi: 10.1177/ 1073858407304654
doi: 10.1177/1073858407304654URLpmid: 17911216
[25] Decety J., &Meyer M. ( 2008). From emotion resonance to empathic understanding: A social developmental neuroscience account. Development and Psychopathology, 20, (4), 1053-1080. doi: 10.1017/S0954579408000503
[26] Decety J. ( 2010). The neurodevelopment of empathy in humans. Developmental Neuroscience, 32, (4), 257-267. doi: 10.1159/000317771
doi: 10.1159/000317771URLpmid: 20805682
[27] Deschrijver E., Wiersema J., & Brass M . ( 2016). The interaction between felt touch and tactile consequences of observed actions: An action-based somatosensory congruency paradigm. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11, (7), 1162-1172. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv081
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv081URLpmid: 4927036
[28] Deschrijver E., Wiersema J. R., & Brass M . ( 2017 a). The influence of action observation on action execution: Dissociating the contribution of action on perception, perception on action, and resolving conflict. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 17, (2), 381-393. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0485-5
doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0485-5URLpmid: 28000082
[29] Deschrijver E., Wiersema J., & Brass M . ( 2017 b). Action-based touch observation in adults with high functioning autism: Can compromised self-other distinction abilities link social and sensory everyday problems? Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12, (2), 273-282. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw126
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw126URLpmid: 5390705
[30] Diamond A .( 2006). The early development of executive functions. In E. C. Bialystok, & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change (pp. 70-95). New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
[31] , , Doebel S., &Munakata Y. ( 2018). Group influences on engaging self-control: Children delay gratification and value it more when their in-group delays and their out-group doesn’t. Psychological Science, 29, (5), 738-748. doi: 10.1177/0956797617747367
doi: 10.1177/0956797617747367URLpmid: 29625014
[32] Fabbri-Destro M., &Rizzolatti G. ( 2008). Mirror neurons and mirror systems in monkeys and humans. Physiology, 23, (3), 171-179. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00004.2008
doi: 10.1152/physiol.00004.2008URLpmid: 18556470
[33] Gallese V., Rochat M. J., & Berchio C . ( 2013). The mirror mechanism and its potential role in autism spectrum disorder. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 55, (1), 15-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04398.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04398.xURLpmid: 22924341
[34] Genschow O., van den Bossche S., Cracco E., Bardi L., Rigoni D., & Brass M . ( 2017). Mimicry and automatic imitation are not correlated. PLoS One, 12, (9), e0183784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183784
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183784URLpmid: 28877197
[35] Happé F . ( 1994). An advanced test of theory of mind-understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, (2), 129-154. doi: 10.1007/BF02172093
[36] Happé F., Cook J. L., & Bird G . ( 2017). The structure of social cognition: In (ter)dependence of sociocognitive processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, (1), 243-267. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044046
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044046URLpmid: 27687121
[37] Heyes C .( 2011). Automatic imitation. Psychological Bulletin, 137, (3), 463-483. doi: 10.1037/a0022288
[38] Knyazev G.G . ( 2013). EEG correlates of self-referential processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 264. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00264
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00264URLpmid: 23761757
[39] Kilford E. J., Garrett E., & Blakemore S-J . ( 2016). The development of social cognition in adolescence: An integrated perspective. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 70, 106-120. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08. 016
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.016URLpmid: 27545755
[40] Leighton J., Bird G., Charman T., & Heyes C . ( 2008). Weak imitative performance is not due to a functional ‘mirroring’ deficit in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Neuropsychologia, 46, (4), 1041-1049. doi: 10. 1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.013
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.013URLpmid: 18177677
[41] Marsh L., Bird G., & Catmur C . ( 2016). The imitation game: Effects of social cues on 'imitation' are domain-general in nature. Neuroimage, 139, 368-375. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.050
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.050URLpmid: 27369095
[42] Miyake A., Friedman N. P., Emerson M. J., Witzki A. H., Howerter A., & Wager T. D . ( 2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, (1), 49-100. doi: 10.1006/cogp. 1999.0734
[43] Molenberghs P., Cunnington R., & Mattingley J. B . ( 2009). Is the mirror neuron system involved in imitation? A short review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, (7), 975-980. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009. 03.010
[44] Mulert C., Pogarell O., Juckel G., Rujescu D., Giegling I., Rupp D., .. Hegerl U . ( 2004). The neural basis of the P300 potential: Focus on the time-course of the underlying cortical generators. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 254, (3), 190-198. doi: 10.1007/ s00406-004-0469-2
doi: 10.1007/s00406-004-0469-2URLpmid: 15205974
[45] Nilsen E.S., &Graham S.A . ( 2009). The relations between children's communicative perspective-taking and executive functioning. Cognitive Psychology, 58, (2), 220-249. doi: 10. 1016/j.cogpsych.2008.07.002
[46] Nigg J.T . ( 2017). Annual research review: On the relations among self-regulation, self-control, executive functioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk- taking, and inhibition for developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58, (4), 361-383. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12675
[47] Over H., &Carpenter M. ( 2013). The social side of imitation. Child Development Perspectives, 7, (1), 6-11. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12006
doi: 10.1111/cdep.12006URL
[48] Oakley B., Brewer R., Bird G., & Catmur C . ( 2016). Theory of mind is not theory of emotion: A cautionary note on the reading the mind in the eyes test. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, (6), 818-823. doi: 10.1037/abn0000182
doi: 10.1037/abn0000182URLpmid: 27505409
[49] Pawling R., Kirkham A. J., Hayes A. E., & Tipper S. P . ( 2017). Incidental retrieval of prior emotion mimicry. Experimental Brain Research, 235, (4), 1173-1184. doi: 10. 1007/s00221-017-4882-y
doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4882-yURLpmid: 5477702
[50] Perrin F., Maquet P., Peigneux P., Ruby P., Degueldre C., Balteau E., .. Laureys S . ( 2005). Neural mechanisms involved in the detection of our first name: A combined ERPs and PET study. Neuropsychologia, 43, (1), 12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.07.002
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.07.002URLpmid: 15488900
[51] Perry A., Saunders S. N., Stiso J., Dewar C., Lubell J., Meling T. R., Solbakk A-K., Knight R. T . ( 2017). Effects of prefrontal cortex damage on emotion understanding: EEG and behavioural evidence. Brain, 140, 1086-1099. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx031
doi: 10.1093/brain/awx031URLpmid: 28334943
[52] Rizzolatti G., &Craighero L. ( 2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, (1), 169-192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
[53] Rizzolatti G., &Sinigaglia C. ( 2010). The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, (4), 264-274. doi: 10.1038/nrn2805
doi: 10.1038/nrn2805URLpmid: 20216547
[54] Romine C.B., &Reynolds C.R . ( 2005). A model of the development of frontal lobe functioning: Findings from a meta-analysis. Applied Neuropsychology, 12, (4), 190-201. doi: 10.1207/s15324826an1204_2
doi: 10.1207/s15324826an1204_2URLpmid: 16422660
[55] Saito N., Yokoyama T., & Ohira H . ( 2016). Self-other distinction enhanced empathic responses in individuals with alexithymia. Scientific Reports, 6, 35059. doi: 10. 1038/srep35059
doi: 10.1038/srep35059URLpmid: 27739448
[56] Santiesteban I., White S., Cook J., Gilbert S., Heyes C., & Bird G . ( 2012). Training social cognition: From imitation to theory of mind. Cognition, 122, (2), 228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.004
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.004URLpmid: 22133627
[57] Schulte-Rüther M., Otte E., Adigüzel K., Firk C., Herpertz-Dahlmann B., Koch I., & Konrad K . ( 2017). Intact mirror mechanisms for automatic facial emotions in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 1 0(2), 298-310. doi: 10.1002/aur.1654
doi: 10.1002/aur.1654URLpmid: 27349835
[58] Smith A . ( 2009). The empathy imbalance hypothesis of autism: A theoretical approach to cognitive and emotional empathy in autistic development. Psychological Record, 59, (3), 489-510. doi: 10.1007/BF03395675
doi: 10.1007/BF03395675URL
[59] Sowden S., Koehne S., Catmur C., Dziobek I., & Bird G . ( 2016). Intact automatic imitation and typical spatial compatibility in autism spectrum disorder: Challenging the broken mirror theory. Autism Research, 9, (2), 292-300. doi: 10.1002/aur.1511
doi: 10.1002/aur.1511URLpmid: 26112060
[60] Sowden S., &Shah P. ( 2014). Self-other control: A candidate mechanism for social cognitive function. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 789. doi: 10. 3389/fnhum.2014.00789
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00789URLpmid: 4189007
[61] Spengler S., von Cramon D. Y., & Brass M . ( 2009). Control of shared representations relies on key processes involved in mental state attribution. Human Brain Mapping, 30, (11), 3704-3718. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20800
[62] Spengler S., Bird G., & Brass M . ( 2010). Hyperimitation of actions is related to reduced understanding of others' minds in autism spectrum conditions. Biological Psychiatry, 68, (12), 1148-1155. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych. 2010.09.017
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.017URLpmid: 21130224
[63] Steinbeis N .( 2016). The role of self-other distinction in understanding others' mental and emotional states: Neurocognitive mechanisms in children and adults. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b-Biological Sciences, 371, (1686), 20150074-20150074. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0074
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0074URLpmid: 26644593
[64] Symeonidou I., Dumontheil I., Chow W-Y., & Breheny R . ( 2016). Development of online use of theory of mind during adolescence: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 149, 81-97. doi: 10.1016/ j.jecp.2015.11.007
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.11.007URLpmid: 26723471
[65] Wang Y. W., Liu Y., Gao Y. X., Chen J., Zhang W. X., & Lin C. D . ( 2008). False belief reasoning in the brain: An ERP study. Science in China Series C: Life Sciences, 51, (1), 72-79. doi: 10.1007/s11427-008-0014-z
doi: 10.1007/s11427-008-0014-zURLpmid: 18176794
[66] Wang X.S., &Su Y.J . ( 2018). Effects of inhibitory control on social cognition were moderated by self-other control in middle adolescence. Manuscript submitted for publication.
[67] White S., Hill E., Happe F., & Frith U . ( 2009). Revisiting the strange stories: Revealing mentalizing impairments in autism. Child Development, 80, (4), 1097-1117. doi: 10. 1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01319.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01319.xURLpmid: 196308962175
[68] Wilson J., Andrews G., Hogan C., Wang S., & Shum D. H. K . ( 2018). Executive function in middle childhood and the relationship with theory of mind. Developmental Neuropsychology, 43, (3), 163-182. doi: 10.1080/87565641. 2018.1440296
doi: 10.1080/87565641.2018.1440296URL




[1]肖承丽, 隋雨檠, 肖苏衡, 周仁来. 空间交互研究新视角:多重社会因素的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 796-805.
[2]温芳芳, 佐斌, 马书瀚, 谢志杰. 面孔识别的自我群体偏向[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7): 1164-1171.
[3]陈丝璐, 张光磊, 刘文兴. 伦理导向人力资源管理实践的跨层次作用机制:基于社会情境与社会认知理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(11): 1800-1813.
[4]黄勖喆, 褚晓伟, 刘庆奇, 周宗奎, 范翠英. 网络欺负中的旁观者行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1248-1257.
[5]王弘钰, 崔智淞, 邹纯龙, 于佳利, 赵迪. 忠诚还是叛逆?中国组织情境下的员工越轨创新行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(6): 975-989.
[6]王劭睿, 陈红. 为何越减越肥?——限制性饮食者过度进食的心理机制及影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(2): 322-328.
[7]魏华, 周仁来. 焦虑个体抑制控制缺陷的研究现状和争议:基于注意控制理论视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(11): 1853-1862.
[8]孙岩, 房林, 王亭予, 崔丽. 自闭症谱系障碍者抑制控制的影响因素及神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(8): 1450-1464.
[9]李文岐, 张梦圆, 寇彧. 个体的政治倾向及其变化机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(3): 549-559.
[10]杨沈龙, 郭永玉, 喻丰, 饶婷婷, 赵靓, 许丽颖. 系统合理化何以形成——三种不同的解释视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(12): 2238-2248.
[11]周晶, 宣宾. 额叶区域的经颅直流电刺激对抑制控制的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(11): 1976-1991.
[12]常欣, 白鹤, 王沛. 双语者语言切换代价的影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(9): 1469-1478.
[13]邓之君, 吴慧中, 陈英和. 数字空间联结的工作记忆机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(9): 1492-1502.
[14]叶佩霞;朱睿达;唐红红; 买晓琴; 刘超. 近红外光学成像在社会认知神经科学中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(5): 731-741.
[15]岳童, 黄希庭, 刘光远. 催产素影响人类社会认知的性别差异[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(12): 2157-2167.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4654
相关话题/心理 科学 控制 社会 空间