), 李梦思, 潘如 浙江大学心理与行为科学系, 杭州 310028
收稿日期:2018-02-02出版日期:2018-10-15发布日期:2018-08-27通讯作者:聂爱情E-mail:nieaiq@126.com基金资助:*浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY17C090003);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(17YJA190010);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助How does encoding predict retrieval? Evidence from subsequent memory effects
NIE Aiqing(), LI Mengsi, PAN Ru Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China
Received:2018-02-02Online:2018-10-15Published:2018-08-27Contact:NIE Aiqing E-mail:nieaiq@126.com摘要/Abstract
摘要： 在记忆领域, 编码与提取之间的关系始终备受关注。近37年(1980至今)的研究显示, 随后记住信息与随后遗忘信息在编码阶段关联的神经机制明显不同(该差异被称为相继记忆效应), 表明编码能够从神经机制角度预测提取。过去10年间(2008~2017), 研究者在顺承先前研究的基础上另辟蹊径, 重点从编码任务中加工水平及目标导向对相继记忆效应的影响、提取任务对相继记忆效应的影响、不同年龄群体之间的相继记忆效应异同、情绪项目和情绪背景对相继记忆效应的影响等角度展开研究。本文从上述四方面对相关研究进行了详细梳理, 并从整合研究成果、完善理论模型、挖掘潜在社会因素、探究个体差异和群体差异以及加强应用推广等方面对今后研究进行展望。
参考文献 71
| 1 | 郭春彦, 朱滢, 丁锦红, 范思陆 . ( 2003). 不同加工与记忆编码关系的ERP研究. 心理学报, 35( 2), 150-156. |
| 2 | 秦绍正, 韩布新, 罗劲 . ( 2007). 相继记忆模式: 展现情节记忆形成脑机制的窗口. 心理科学进展, 15( 3), 401-408. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2007.03.003URL |
| 3 | Becker N., Kalpouzos G., Persson J., Laukka E. J., & Brehmer Y . ( 2017). Differential effects of encoding instructions on brain activity patterns of item and associative memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29( 3), 545-559. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01062URL |
| 4 | Brehmer Y., Shing Y. L., Heekeren H. R., Lindenberger U., & Bäckman L . ( 2016). Training-induced changes in subsequent-memory effects: No major differences among children, younger adults, and older adults. NeuroImage, 131, 214-225. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.074URL |
| 5 | Bridger E. K., & Wilding, E. L . ( 2010). Requirements at retrieval modulate subsequent memory effects: An event- related potential study. Cognitive Neuroscience, 1( 4), 254-260. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2010.484882URLpmid: 24168378 |
| 6 | Brocher A., & Graf, T. ( 2017). Decision-related factors in pupil old/new effects: Attention, response execution, and false memory. Neuropsychologia, 102, 124-134. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.011URL |
| 7 | Cansino S., Estrada-Manilla C., Trejo-Morales P., Pasaye- Alcaraz E. H., Aguilar-Castañeda E., Salgado-Lujambio P., & Sosa-Ortiz A. L . ( 2015). fMRI subsequent source memory effects in young, middle-aged and old adults. Behavioural Brain Research, 280, 24-35. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.11.042URLpmid: 25476566 |
| 8 | Cansino S., Trejo-Morales P., Estrada-Manilla C., Pasaye- Alcaraz E. H., Aguilar-Castañeda E., Salgado-Lujambio P., & Sosa-Ortiz A. L . ( 2017). Effective connectivity during successful and unsuccessful recollection in young and old adults. Neuropsychologia, 103, 168-182. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.016URL |
| 9 | Cassidy B. S., Hedden T., Yoon C., & Gutchess A. H . ( 2014). Age differences in medial prefrontal activity for subsequent memory of truth value. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 87. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00087URLpmid: 3916770 |
| 10 | Collier A. K., Wolf D. H., Valdez J. N., Gur R. E., & Gur R. C . ( 2014). Subsequent memory effects in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 224( 3), 211-217. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.10.012URLpmid: 25453165 |
| 11 | de Chastelaine M., Mattson J. T., Wang T. H., Donley B. E., & Rugg M. D . ( 2015). Sensitivity of negative subsequent memory and task-negative effects to age and associative memory performance. Brain Research, 1612, 16-29. |
| 12 | de Chastelaine M., Mattson J. T., Wang T. H., Donley B. E., & Rugg M. D . ( 2016). The relationships between age, associative memory performance, and the neural correlates of successful associative memory encoding. Neurobiology of Aging, 42, 163-176. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.03.015URL |
| 13 | de Chastelaine, M., & Rugg, M. D . ( 2015). The effects of study task on prestimulus subsequent memory effects in the hippocampus. Hippocampus, 25( 11), 1217-1223. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22489URLpmid: 26135908 |
| 14 | de Chastelaine M., Wang T. H., Minton B., Muftuler L. T., & Rugg M. D . ( 2011). The effects of age, memory performance, and callosal integrity on the neural correlates of successful associative encoding. Cerebral Cortex, 21( 9), 2166-2176. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq294URL |
| 15 | Doidge A. N., Evans L. H., Herron J. E., & Wilding E. L . ( 2017). Separating content-specific retrieval from post-retrieval processing. Cortex, 86, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.10.003URLpmid: 5264396 |
| 16 | Dolcos F., LaBar K. S., & Cabeza R . ( 2004). Dissociable effects of arousal and valence on prefrontal activity indexing emotional evaluation and subsequent memory: An event- related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 23, 64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.015URL |
| 17 | Dulas M. R., & Duarte, A. ( 2013). The influence of directed attention at encoding on source memory retrieval in the young and old: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1500, 55-71. |
| 18 | Duverne S., Motamedinia S., & Rugg M. D . ( 2009). The relationship between aging, performance, and the neural correlates of successful memory encoding. Cerebral Cortex, 19( 3), 733-744. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn122URL |
| 19 | Estrada-Manilla C., & Cansino, S. ( 2012). Event-related potential variations in the encoding and retrieval of different amounts of contextual information. Behavioural Brain Research, 232( 1), 190-201. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.04.012URL |
| 20 | Fellner M. C., Bäuml K. T., & Hanslmayr S . ( 2013). Brain oscillatory subsequent memory effects differ in power and long-range synchronization between semantic and survival processing. NeuroImage, 79, 361-370. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.121URL |
| 21 | Fernandes M. A., Moscovitch M., Ziegler M., & Grady C . ( 2005). Brain regions associated with successful and unsuccessful retrieval of verbal episodic memory as revealed by divided attention. Neuropsychologia, 43( 8), 1115-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.026URL |
| 22 | Friedman D., & Johnson, R. J . ( 2000). Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review. Microscopy Research and Technique, 51( 1), 6-28. doi: 10.1002/1097-0029(20001001)51:13.0.CO;2-RURLpmid: 11002349 |
| 23 | Galli G., Wolpe N., & Otten L. J . ( 2011). Sex differences in the use of anticipatory brain activity to encode emotional events. Journal of Neuroscience, 31( 34), 12364-12370. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1619-11.2011URLpmid: 3173860 |
| 24 | Gao C. J., Hermiller M. S., Voss J. L., & Guo C. Y . ( 2015). Basic perceptual changes that alter meaning and neural correlates of recognition memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 49. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00049URLpmid: 4324141 |
| 25 | Gärtner M., & Bajbouj, M. ( 2014). Encoding-related EEG oscillations during memory formation are modulated by mood state. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscence, 9( 12), 1934-1941. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst184URLpmid: 24464848 |
| 26 | Geng F., Canada K., & Riggins T . ( 2018). Age- and performance-related differences in encoding during early childhood: Insights from event-related potentials. Memory, 26( 4), 451-461. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1366526URL |
| 27 | Ghetti S., DeMaster D. M., Yonelinas A. P., & Bunge S. A . ( 2010). Developmental differences in medial temporal lobe function during memory encoding. Journal of Neuroscience, 30( 28), 9548-9556. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3500-09.2010URLpmid: 2937832 |
| 28 | Guo C., Duan L., Li W., & Paller K. A . ( 2006). Distinguishing source memory and item memory: Brain potentials at encoding and retrieval. Brain Research, 1118( 1), 142-154. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.034URLpmid: 16978588 |
| 29 | Hanslmayr S., & Staudigl, T. ( 2014). How brain oscillations form memories — A processing based perspective on oscillatory subsequent memory effects. NeuroImage, 85, 648-655. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.121URL |
| 30 | Hayes J. M., Tang L., Viviano R. P., Rooden V. S., Ofen N., & Damoiseaux J. S . ( 2017). Subjective memory complaints are associated with brain activation supporting successful memory encoding. Neurobiology of Aging, 60, 71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.08.015URL |
| 31 | Hoppstädter M., Baeuchl C., Diener C., Flor H., & Meyer P . ( 2015). Simultaneous EEG-fMRI reveals brain networks underlying recognition memory ERP old/new effects. NeuroImage, 116, 112-122. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.026URL |
| 32 | Hsieh L. T., Hung D. L., Tzeng O. J. L., Lee J. R., & Cheng S . ( 2009). An event-related potential investigation of the processing of remember/forget cues and item encoding in item-method directed forgetting. Brain Research, 1250, 190-201. |
| 33 | Kamp S. M., Bader R., & Mecklinger A . ( 2017). ERP subsequent memory effects differ between inter-item and unitization encoding tasks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 30. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2017.00030URLpmid: 5403928 |
| 34 | Kamp S. M., Potts G. F., & Donchin E . ( 2015). On the roles of distinctiveness and semantic expectancies in episodic encoding of emotional words. Psychophysiology, 52( 12), 1599-1609. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12537URL |
| 35 | Kiefer M., Schuch S., Schenck W., & Fiedler K . ( 2007). Emotion and memory: Event-related potential indices predictive for subsequent successful memory depend on the emotional mood state. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3( 3), 363-373. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0001-8URL |
| 36 | Kim H., ( 2011). Neural activity that predicts subsequent memory and forgetting: A meta-analysis of 74 fMRI studies. NeuroImage, 54, 2446-2461. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.045URL |
| 37 | Kontaxopoulou D., Beratis I. N., Fragkiadaki S., Pavlou D., Yannis G., Economou A., .. Papageorgiou S. G . ( 2017). Incidental and intentional memory: Their relation with attention and executive functions. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 32( 5), 519-532. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acx027URLpmid: 28383645 |
| 38 | Kuo M. C. C., Liu K. P. Y., Ting K. H ., & Chan, C. C. H. ( 2012). Differentiation of perceptual and semantic subsequent memory effects using an orthographic paradigm. Brain Research, 1486, 82-91. |
| 39 | Leventon J. S., & Bauer, P. J . ( 2016). Emotion regulation during the encoding of emotional stimuli: Effects on subsequent memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 142, 312-333. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.024URLpmid: 26597138 |
| 40 | Liang J. C., & Preston, A. R . ( 2017). Medial temporal lobe reinstatement of content-specific details predicts source memory. Cortex, 91, 67-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.09.011URLpmid: 28029355 |
| 41 | Liu Y., Rosburg T., Gao C., Weber C., & Guo C . ( 2017). Differentiation of subsequent memory effects between retrieval practice and elaborative study. Biological Psychology, 127, 134-147. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.05.010URLpmid: 28552619 |
| 42 | Maillet D., & Rajah, M. N . ( 2014 a). Age-related differences in brain activity in the subsequent memory paradigm: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 45, 246-257. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.006URLpmid: 24973756 |
| 43 | Maillet D., & Rajah, M. N . ( 2014 b). Dissociable roles of default-mode regions during episodic encoding. NeuroImage, 89, 244-255. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.050URLpmid: 24315838 |
| 44 | Malejka S., & Bröder, A. ( 2016). No source memory for unrecognized items when implicit feedback is avoided. Memory & Cognition, 44, 63-72. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0549-8URL |
| 45 | Martínez-Galindo J. G., & Cansino, S. ( 2015). Positive and negative emotional contexts unevenly predict episodic memory. Behavioural Brain Research, 291, 89-102. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.05.018URLpmid: 26003944 |
| 46 | Nie A., Guo C., Wu Y., Qu N., & Ding J . ( 2004). Picture encoding and retrieval: An event-related potential study. Chinese Science Bulletin, 49( 20), 2148-2154. doi: 10.1007/BF03185781URL |
| 47 | Osipova D., Takashima A., Oostenveld R., Fernández G., Maris E., & Jensen O . ( 2006). Theta and gamma oscillations predict encoding and retrieval of declarative memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 26( 28), 7523-7531. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1948-06.2006URLpmid: 16837600 |
| 48 | Ozubko J. D., & Sel, P. ( 2016). Forget all that nonsense: The role of meaning during the forgetting of recollective and familiarity-based memories. Neuropsychologia, 90, 136-147. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.026URL |
| 49 | Paller K. A., Kutas M., & Mayes A. R . ( 1987). Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 67( 4), 360-371. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(87)90124-6URLpmid: 2441971 |
| 50 | Park H., Kennedy K. M., Rodrigue K. M., Hebrank A., & Park D. C . ( 2013). An fMRI study of episodic encoding across the lifespan: Changes in subsequent memory effects are evident by middle-age. Neuropsychologia, 51( 3), 448-456. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.025URL |
| 51 | Park H., Uncapher M. R ., & Rugg, A. M. D. ( 2008). Effects of study task on the neural correlates of source encoding. Learning & Memory, 15( 6), 417-425. doi: 10.1101/lm.878908URLpmid: 2414252 |
| 52 | Proberbio A. M., La Mastra F., & Zani A . ( 2016). How negative social bias affects memory for faces: An electrical neuroimaging study. PLoS One, 11( 9), e0162671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162671URL |
| 53 | Righi S., Marzi T., Toscani M., Baldassi S., Ottonello S., & Viggiano M. P . ( 2012). Fearful expressions enhance recognition memory: Electrophysiological evidence. Acta Psychologica, 139( 1), 7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.09.015URLpmid: 22036588 |
| 54 | Rollins L., & Riggins, T. ( 2013). Developmental changes in memory encoding: Insights from event-related potentials. Developmental Science, 16( 4), 599-609. doi: 10.1111/desc.12072URLpmid: 23786477 |
| 55 | Rollins L., & Riggins, T. ( 2018). Age-related differences in subjective recollection: ERP studies of encoding and retrieval. Developmental Science, 21( 3), e12583. doi: 10.1111/desc.12583URLpmid: 28677331 |
| 56 | Ross R. S., Medrano P., Boyle K., Smolen A., Curran T., & Nyhus E . ( 2015). Genetic variation in the serotonin transporter gene influences ERP old/new effects during recognition memory. Neuropsychologia, 78, 95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.09.028URL |
| 57 | Sanquist T. F., Rohrbaugh J. W., Syndulko K., & Lindsey D. B . ( 1980). Electrocortical signs of levels of processing: Perceptual analysis and recognition memory. Psychophysiology, 17( 6), 568-576. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1980.tb02299.xURLpmid: 7443924 |
| 58 | Schwarz N., ( 2010). Feelings-as-information theory. In P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology( pp. 289-308). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. |
| 59 | Shing Y. L., Brehmer Y., Heekeren H. R., Bäckman L., & Lindenberger U . ( 2016). Neural activation patterns of successful episodic encoding: Reorganization during childhood, maintenance in old age. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 59-69. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2016.06.003URL |
| 60 | Shing Y. L., Werkle-Bergner M., Brehmer Y., Müller V., Li S. C., & Lindenberger U . ( 2010). Episodic memory across the lifespan: The contributions of associative and strategic components. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34( 7), 1080-1091. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.11.002URLpmid: 19896974 |
| 61 | Sliwa J., & Freiwald, W. A . ( 2017). A dedicated network for social interaction processing in the primate brain. Science, 356, 745-749. doi: 10.1126/science.aam6383URLpmid: 5540642 |
| 62 | Tsoi L., Dungan J., Waytz A., & Young L . ( 2016). Distinct neural patterns of social cognition for cooperation versus competition. NeuroImage, 137, 86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.069URLpmid: 27165762 |
| 63 | Vogelsang D. A., Bonnici H. M., Bergström Z. M., Ranganath C., & Simons J. S . ( 2016). Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information. Neuropsychologia, 89, 356-363. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.016URL |
| 64 | Voss J. L., & Paller, K. A . ( 2009). Remembering and knowing: Electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval. NeuroImage, 46, 280-289. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.048URLpmid: 19457375 |
| 65 | Wagner A. D., Koutstaal W., & Schacter D. L . ( 1999). When encoding yields remembering: Insights from event- related neuroimaging. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 354( 1387), 1307-1324. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0481URLpmid: 1692641 |
| 66 | Watts S., Buratto L. G., Brotherhood E. V., Barnacle G. E., & Schaefer A . ( 2014). The neural fate of neutral information in emotion-enhanced memory. Psychophysiology, 51( 7), 673-684. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12211URLpmid: 24673606 |
| 67 | Wilding E. L. , & Sharpe, H. ( 2003) . Episodic memory encoding and retrieval: Recent insights from event-related potentials. In A. Zani, A. M. Proverbio, & M. I. Posner (Eds.), The cognitive electrophysiology of mind and brain (pp. 169-196). San Diego: Academic Press. |
| 68 | Wong J. X., de Chastelaine M., & Rugg M. D . ( 2013). Comparison of the neural correlates of encoding item-item and item-context associations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 436. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00436URLpmid: 3743067 |
| 69 | Wong S., Irish M., O’Callaghan C., Kumfor F., Savage G., Hodges J. R., .. Hornberger M . ( 2017). Should I trust you? Learning and memory of social interactions in dementia. Neuropsychologia, 104, 157-167. doi: 10.1007/s00234-017-1892-1URLpmid: 28811259 |
| 70 | Yick Y. Y., Buratto L. G., & Schaefer A . ( 2015). The effects of negative emotion on encoding-related neural activity predicting item and source recognition. Neuropsychologia, 73, 48-59. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.030URL |
| 71 | Yonelinas A. P., Aly M., Wang W. C., & Koen J. D . ( 2010). Recollection and familiarity: Examining controversial assumptions and new directions. Hippocampus, 20( 11), 1178-1194. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20864URLpmid: 20848606 |
相关文章 15
| [1] | 张辉华. 社会网络视角的团队情绪智力[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(8): 1381-1395. |
| [2] | 李晓明, 邹是, 高友明. 失望情绪在不作为惯性产生中的作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(8): 1396-1401. |
| [3] | 张珊珊, 王婧怡, 李昱汝. 情绪自旋及其心理健康功能[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(8): 1430-1437. |
| [4] | 曾宪卿, 许冰, 孙博, 叶健彤, 傅世敏. EMMN受偏差-标准刺激对类型和情绪类型影响: 来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1163-1178. |
| [5] | 王晓田, 王娜, 何金波. 前瞻性情绪作为社会风险的信息源假说：公共场景下风险决策的情绪及文化机制探讨[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 959-966. |
| [6] | 彭坚, 曹兵兵. 追随者主动工作行为的上行影响：内隐追随视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 967-977. |
| [7] | 何蔚祺, 李帅霞, 赵东方. 群体面孔情绪感知的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 761-772. |
| [8] | 尹俊婷, 王冠, 罗俊龙. 威胁对创造力的影响：认知与情绪双加工路径[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 815-826. |
| [9] | 王学思, 李静雅, 王美芳. 父母婚姻冲突对儿童发展的影响及其机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 875-884. |
| [10] | 丁琳洁, 李旭, 尹述飞. 工作记忆中的积极效应：情绪效价与任务相关性的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 652-664. |
| [11] | 关旭旭, 王红波. 抑制引起的遗忘及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 665-676. |
| [12] | 张衍, 王俊秀, 席居哲. 幸灾乐祸的重新审视和互动过程模型的构想[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(3): 505-519. |
| [13] | 赵小红, 童薇, 陈桃林, 吴冬梅, 张蕾, 陈正举, 方晓义, 龚启勇, 唐小蓉. 敬畏的心理模型及其认知神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(3): 520-530. |
| [14] | 霍鹏辉, 冯成志, 陈庭继. 注视者及观察者因素对注视知觉的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 238-251. |
| [15] | 黄挚靖, 李旭. 抑郁症患者工作记忆内情绪刺激加工的特点及其机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 252-267. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4475
