张淼^1,2, 吴迪^1,2, 李明³, 凌懿白^1,2, 张明^4,5, 赵科^1,4()

¹ 中国科学院心理研究所, 脑与认知科学国家重点实验室, 北京 100101
² 中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京 100049
³ 吉首大学, 湖南 吉首 416000
⁴ 中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室, 北京 100101
⁵ 大连医科大学心理学系, 大连 116044

收稿日期:2017-11-16出版日期:2018-10-15发布日期:2018-08-27
通讯作者:赵科E-mail:zhaok@psych.ac.cn

基金资助:*国家自然科学基金(31400876);国家自然科学基金(61632004);国家社科基金青年项目(16CMZ035);中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室课题(KLMH2014ZG11);中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室课题(KLMH2015G07)

The measurement and neural mechanism of sense of agency

ZHANG Miao^1,2, WU Di^1,2, LI Ming³, LING Yibai^1,2, ZHANG Ming^4,5, ZHAO Ke^1,4()

¹ State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
² Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
³ Jishou University, Jishou 416000, China
⁴ Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
⁵ Department of Psychology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China, Beijing 116044, China

Received:2017-11-16Online:2018-10-15Published:2018-08-27
Contact:ZHAO Ke E-mail:zhaok@psych.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 主动控制感指预计动作和实际感觉反馈匹配会产生一种控制自己动作、作用于环境的主观体验, 是人类心理活动的基本特征之一。本文系统介绍主动控制感的测量方式, 尤其是主动动作的时间压缩效应这一内隐手段; 并从主观意识、动作的发生方式和动作结果特征三个方面探讨主动控制感的影响因素。基于动作的比较器模型, 解释主动控制感的产生原因; 并提供了主动控制感的认知神经脑机制的证据, 强调额叶和顶叶在主动控制感中的作用。未来研究应该更加注重外显与内隐测量的一致性, 特殊群体以及主动控制感的脑网络研究。

图/表 2

图1主动控制感的内隐测量方式示意图
图1主动控制感的内隐测量方式示意图



图2动作的内在比较器模型(Synofzik, Vosgerau, & Newen, 2008)
图2动作的内在比较器模型(Synofzik, Vosgerau, & Newen, 2008)

参考文献 48

1	Blakemore S. J., Wolpert D., & Frith C . ( 2000). Why can't you tickle yourself?. Neuroreport, 11( 11), R11-R16.
2	Blanke O., Ortigue S., Landis T., & Seeck M . ( 2002). Neuropsychology: Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions. Nature, 419( 6904), 269-270.
3	Buehner M. J., & Humphreys, G. R . ( 2009). Causal binding of actions to their effects. Psychological Science, 20( 10), 1221-1228. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02435.xURLpmid: 19732384
4	Buehner M. J., & Humphreys, G. R . ( 2010). Causal contraction: Spatial binding in the perception of collision events. Psychological Science, 21( 1), 44-48.
5	Buehner, M. J . ( 2012). Understanding the past, predicting the future: Causation, not intentional action, is the root of temporal binding. Psychological Science, 23( 12), 1490-1497.
6	Caspar E. A., Christensen J. F., Cleeremans A., & Haggard P . ( 2016). Coercion changes the sense of agency in the human brain. Current Biology, 26( 5), 585-592. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.067URLpmid: 4791480
7	Cavazzana A., Begliomini C., & Bisiacchi P. S . ( 2017). Intentional binding as a marker of agency across the lifespan. Consciousness and Cognition, 52, 104-114. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.04.016URLpmid: 28501697
8	Chambon V., Wenke D., Fleming S. M., Prinz W., & Haggard P . ( 2013). An online neural substrate for sense of agency. Cerebral Cortex, 23( 5), 1031-1037. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs059URLpmid: 22510529
9	Chambon V., Moore J. W., & Haggard P . ( 2015). TMS stimulation over the inferior parietal cortex disrupts prospective sense of agency. Brain Structure and Function, 220( 6), 3627-3639. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0878-6URLpmid: 25134684
10	Crivelli D., & Balcon, M. ( 2017). The agent brain: A review of non-invasive brain stimulation studies on sensing agency. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00229URL
11	Ebert J. P., & Wegner, D. M . ( 2010). Time warp: Authorship shapes the perceived timing of actions and events. Consciousness and Cognition, 19( 1), 481-489. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.10.002URLpmid: 19896868
12	Engbert K., & Wohlschläger, A. ( 2007). Intentions and expectations in temporal binding. Consciousness and Cognition, 16( 2), 255-264. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.010URLpmid: 17113309
13	Engbert K., Wohlschläger A., Thomas R., & Haggard P . ( 2007). Agency, subjective time, and other minds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33( 6), 1261-1268. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1261URLpmid: 18085941
14	Engbert K., Wohlschläger A., & Haggard P . ( 2008). Who is causing what? The sense of agency is relational and efferent-triggered. Cognition, 107( 2), 693-704. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.021URLpmid: 17825813
15	Elsner B., & Hommel, B. ( 2004). Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning. Psychological Research, 68( 2-3), 138-154. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0151-8URLpmid: 14685854
16	Farrer C., & Frith, C. D . ( 2002). Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action: The neural correlates of the experience of agency. NeuroImage, 15( 3), 596-603.
17	Fink G. R., Marshall J. C., Halligan P. W., Frith C. D., Driver J., Frackowiak R. S. J., & Dolan R. J . ( 1999). The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. Brain, 122( 3), 497-512. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.3.497URLpmid: 10094258
18	Frith, C. D . ( 2014). Action, agency and responsibility. Neuropsychologia, 55, 137-142.
19	Gomes G., ( 2002). The interpretation of Libet's results on the timing of conscious events: A commentary. Consciousness and Cognition, 11( 2), 221-230. doi: 10.1006/ccog.2002.0556URL
20	Haggard P., ( 2017). Sense of agency in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18( 4), 196-207. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.14URLpmid: 28251993
21	Haggard P., Clark S., & Kalogeras J . ( 2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5( 4), 382-385. doi: 10.1038/nn827URL
22	Hascalovitz A. C., & Obhi, S. S . ( 2015). Personality and intentional binding: An exploratory study using the narcissistic personality inventory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 13. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00013
23	Helmholtz, H. V . ( 1866). Concerning the perceptions in general. Treatise on physiological optics.
24	Humphreys G. R., & Buehner, M. J . ( 2009). Magnitude estimation reveals temporal binding at super-second intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35( 5), 1542-1549. doi: 10.1037/a0014492URLpmid: 19803655
25	James W., ( 1890). The Principles of. Psychology, 2.
26	Jo H. G., Wittmann M., Hinterberger T., & Schmidt S . ( 2014). The readiness potential reflects intentional binding. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 421-421. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00421URLpmid: 24959135
27	Kawato M., ( 1999). Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9( 6), 718-727. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)00028-8URLpmid: 10607637
28	Khalighinejad N., & Haggard, P. ( 2015). Modulating human sense of agency with non-invasive brain stimulation. Cortex, 69, 93-103. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.015URLpmid: 26004997
29	Khalighinejad N., Di C S., & Haggard P . ( 2016). Endogenous action selection processes in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex contribute to sense of agency: A meta- analysis of tDCS studies of ‘intentional binding’. Brain Stimulation, 9( 3), 372-379.
30	Libet B., Gleason C. A., Wright E. W., & Pearl D. K . ( 1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential) the unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain, 106( 3), 623-642.
31	Lindner A., Haarmeier T., Erb M., Grodd W., & Thier P . ( 2006). Cerebrocerebellar circuits for the perceptual cancellation of eye-movement-induced retinal image motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18( 11), 1899-1912.
32	MacDonald P. A., & Paus, T. ( 2003). The role of parietal cortex in awareness of self-generated movements: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cerebral Cortex, 13( 9), 962-967.
33	Moore J. W., & Obhi, S. S . ( 2012). Intentional binding and the sense of agency: A review. Consciousness and Cognition, 21( 1), 546-561. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.002URLpmid: 22240158
34	Moore J. W., Ruge D., Wenke D., Rothwell J., & Haggard P . ( 2010). Disrupting the experience of control in the human brain: Pre-supplementary motor area contributes to the sense of agency. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277, 2503-2509.
35	Shibasaki H., & Hallett, M. ( 2006). What is the Bereitschaftspotential?. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117( 11), 2341-2356. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.04.025URLpmid: 16876476
36	Sirigu A., Daprati E., Pradat-Diehl P., Franck N., & Jeannerod M . ( 1999). Perception of self-generated movement following left parietal lesion. Brain, 122( 10), 1867-1874. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.10.1867URLpmid: 10506089
37	Sperduti M., Delaveau P., Fossati P., & Nadel J . ( 2011). Different brain structures related to self-and external- agency attribution: A brief review and meta-analysis. Brain Structure and Function, 216( 2), 151-157.
38	Stetson C., Cui X., Montague P. R., & Eagleman D. M . ( 2006). Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation. Neuron, 51( 5), 651-659.
39	Synofzik M., Vosgerau G., & Newen A . ( 2008). Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 17( 1), 219-239. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.010URLpmid: 17482480
40	Tapal A., Oren E., Dar R., & Eitam B . ( 2017). The Sense of Agency Scale: A Measure of Consciously Perceived Control over One's Mind, Body, and the Immediate Environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1552.
41	Voss M., Chambon V., Wenke D., Kühn S., & Haggard P . ( 2017). In and out of control: brain mechanisms linking fluency of action selection to self-agency in patients with schizophrenia. Brain, 140( 8), 2226-2239.
42	Wolpert D. M., Ghahramani Z., & Jordan M. I . ( 1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269( 5232), 1880-1882.
43	Yoshie M., & Haggard, P. ( 2013). Negative emotional outcomes attenuate sense of agency over voluntary actions. Current Biology, 23( 20), 2028-2032. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.034URLpmid: 24094850
44	Yoshie M., & Haggard, P. ( 2017). Effects of emotional valence on sense of agency require a predictive model. Scientific Reports, 7( 1), 8733. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08803-3URLpmid: 5562802
45	Zhao K., Chen Y. H., Yan W. J., & Fu X. L . ( 2013). To bind or not to bind? Different temporal binding effects from voluntary pressing and releasing actions. PloS One, 8( 5), e64819.
46	Zhao K., Gu R. L., Wang L., Xiao P., Chen Y. H., Liang J ., .. & Fu, X. L. ( 2014). Voluntary pressing and releasing actions induce different senses of time: Evidence from event-related brain responses. Scientific Reports, 4, 6047.
47	Zhao K., Hu L., Qu F. B., Cui Q., Piao Q. H., Xu H ., .. & Fu, X. L. ( 2016). Voluntary action and tactile sensory feedback in the intentional binding effect. Experimental Brain Research, 234( 8), 2283-2292. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4633-5URLpmid: 27038203
48	Ziessler M., Nattkemper D., & Frensch P. A . ( 2004). The role of anticipation and intention in the learning of effects of self-performed actions. Psychological Research, 68( 2-3), 163-175. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0153-6URLpmid: 14634810

相关文章 15

[1]	秦浩方, 黄蓉, 贾世伟. 反馈相关负波：一种抑郁症的生物标记物[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(3): 404-413.
[2]	沈蕾, 江黛苔, 陈宁, 刘伟. 自豪感的神经基础：比较的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 131-139.
[3]	陈乐乐, 黄蓉, 贾世伟. 反馈相关负波与成瘾[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(6): 959-968.
[4]	张建平, 秦传燕, 刘善仕. 寻求反馈能改善绩效吗?——反馈寻求行为与个体绩效关系的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(4): 549-565.
[5]	蔡笑, 张清芳. 言语运动系统中前馈和反馈控制整合加工的作用机制 *[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(4): 588-603.
[6]	万楠, 朱树青, 贾世伟. 反馈间隔影响反馈加工：整合行为和电生理研究的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(2): 230-239.
[7]	马舒, 章薇, 史金磊, 杨振. 基于认知机制的有条件自动驾驶接管中的人因问题[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(1): 150-160.
[8]	李倩, 龚诗阳, 李超凡. 团队文化多样性对团队创新的影响及作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(9): 1521-1539.
[9]	陈圣栋, 陈永强, 高伟, 罗利, 杨洁敏, 袁加锦. 认知加工的自动化现象：从二分法到渐进观[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(9): 1556-1563.
[10]	吴迪, 顾晶金, 李明, 张淼, 张明, 赵科, 傅小兰. 动作的主动控制感与因果关系的主动控制感：主动动作时间压缩效应的产生机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(5): 804-810.
[11]	白新文, 齐舒婷, 明晓东, 周意勇, 黄明权. 骏马易见, 伯乐难寻：决策者心智模式影响创意识别的机制及边界条件[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(4): 571-586.
[12]	车敬上, 孙海龙, 肖晨洁, 李爱梅. 为什么信息超载损害决策?基于有限认知资源的解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(10): 1758-1768.
[13]	李丹阳, 李鹏, 李红. 反馈负波及其近10年理论解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(9): 1642-1650.
[14]	张颖, 杨付. 反馈寻求行为的影响因素和本土化发展 *[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(6): 1121-1130.
[15]	梅宏玉, 吴嵩. 测谎者的无意识加工对谎言识别的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(11): 2035-2045.

PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4476