删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

解释水平对自我控制的影响

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

张玥1,2, 窦东徽1(), 辛自强1
1中央财经大学社会与心理学院心理学系, 北京 100081
2 北京师范大学心理学部, 北京 100875
收稿日期:2017-05-02出版日期:2018-10-15发布日期:2018-08-27
通讯作者:窦东徽E-mail:psychaos@126.com

基金资助:*国家社会科学基金重大项目(17ZDA325);“我国公民财经素养指数建构与数据库建设”

The effect of construal levels on self-control

ZHANG Yue1,2, DOU Donghui1(), XIN Ziqiang1
1 Department of Psychology at School of Sociology and Psychology, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China
2 Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Received:2017-05-02Online:2018-10-15Published:2018-08-27
Contact:DOU Donghui E-mail:psychaos@126.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 解释水平理论认为自我控制是人们依据对事件整体的高解释水平方式而非局部的低解释水平方式做出决策和完成任务。对时间折扣、坚持和健康行为以及前瞻性自我控制的研究表明高解释水平会促进自我控制。高解释水平是通过改变对诱惑的加工(包含对诱惑的态度和诱惑的激活模式)来促进自我控制, 但这种促进作用会受到目标和任务属性(重要性、难度、效价、完成时间和呈现方式)以及解释水平线索属性(外显和内隐)的调节。解释水平理论视角下的自我控制研究可以拓宽自我控制双系统理论和资源理论的视野, 如提供可能的边界条件和认知机制。未来研究还需要深入挖掘解释水平影响自我控制的内在机制和生理基础, 重视心理距离的影响以及加强对自控能力的长期追踪研究。


1 李雁晨, 周庭锐, 周琇 . ( 2009). 解释水平理论: 从时间距离到心理距离. 心理科学进展, 17( 4), 667-677.
2 Agrawal N., & Wan, E. W . ( 2009). Regulating risk or risking regulation? Construal levels and depletion effects in the processing of health messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 36( 3), 448-462.
doi: 10.1086/597331URL
3 Ainslie G., ( 1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82( 4), 463-496.
doi: 10.1037/h0076860URLpmid: 1099599
4 Amodio D. M., Devine P. G., & Harmon-Jones E . ( 2007). A dynamic model of guilt implications for motivation and self-regulation in the context of prejudice. Psychological Science, 18( 6), 524-530.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01933.xURL
5 Baumeister R. F., Bratslavsky E., Muraven M., & Tice D. M . ( 1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74( 5), 1252-1265.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252URLpmid: 9599441
6 Bar-Anan Y., Liberman N., Trope Y., & Algom D . ( 2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136( 4), 610-622.
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.610URLpmid: 3161424
7 Beedie C. J., & Lane, A. M . ( 2012). The role of glucose in self-control: Another look at the evidence and an alternative conceptualization. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16( 2), 143-153.
doi: 10.1177/1088868311419817URL
8 Benhabib J., Bisin A., & Schotter A . ( 2010). Present-bias, quasi-hyperbolic discounting, and fixed costs. Games and Economic Behavior, 69( 2), 205-223.
doi: 10.1016/j.geb.2009.11.003URL
9 Bruyneel S. D., & Dewitte, S. ( 2012). Engaging in self-regulation results in low-level construals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42( 6), 763-769.
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1896URL
10 Burson A., Crocker J., & Mischkowski D . ( 2012). Two types of value-affirmation implications for self-control following social exclusion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3( 4), 510-516.
doi: 10.1177/1948550611427773URL
11 Casey B. J., Somerville L. H., Gotlib I. H., Ayduk O., Franklin N. T., Askren M. K., .. Shoda Y . ( 2011). Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of American, 108( 36), 14998-15003.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108561108URLpmid: 4117069
12 Chiou W. B., Wu W. H., & Chang M. H . ( 2013). Think abstractly, smoke less: A brief construal-level intervention can promote self-control, leading to reduced cigarette consumption among current smokers. Addiction, 108( 5), 985-992.
doi: 10.1111/add.2013.108.issue-5URL
13 De Ridder D. T., Lensvelt-Mulders G., Finkenauer C., Stok F. M., & Baumeister R. F . ( 2012). Taking stock of self-control a meta-analysis of How trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16( 1), 76-99.
doi: 10.1177/1088868311418749URL
14 Fishbach A., Friedman R. S., & Kruglanski A. W . ( 2003). Leading us not into temptation: Momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84( 2), 296-309.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.296URLpmid: 12585805
15 Freitas A. L., Gollwitzer P., & Trope Y . ( 2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others' self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40( 6), 739-752.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.003URL
16 Freitas A. L., Salovey P., & Liberman N . ( 2001). Abstract and concrete self-evaluative goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80( 3), 410-424.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.410URLpmid: 11300575
17 Fujita K., ( 2008). Seeing the forest beyond the trees: A construal-Level approach to self-control. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2( 3), 1475-1496.
doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00118.xURL
18 Fujita K., ( 2011). On conceptualizing self-control as more than the effortful inhibition of impulses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 352-366.
doi: 10.1177/1088868311411165URL
19 Fujita K., & Carnevale, J. J . ( 2012). Transcending temptation through abstraction the role of construal level in self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21( 4), 248-252.
doi: 10.1177/0963721412449169URL
20 Fujita K., Eyal T., Chaiken S., Trope Y., & Liberman N . ( 2008). Influencing attitudes toward near and distant objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44( 3), 562-572.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.005URLpmid: 2633935
21 Fujita K., & Han, H. A . ( 2009). Moving beyond deliberative control of impulses: The effect of construal levels on evaluative associations in self-control conflicts. Psychological Science, 20( 7), 799-804.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02372.xURL
22 Fujita K., & Roberts, J. C . ( 2010). Promoting prospective self-control through abstraction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46( 6), 1049-1054.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.013URL
23 Fujita K., & Sasota, J. A . ( 2011). The effects of construal levels on asymmetric temptation-goal cognitive associations. Social Cognition, 29( 2), 125-146.
doi: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.2.125URL
24 Fujita K., Trope Y., Liberman N., & Levin-Sagi M . ( 2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90( 3), 351-367.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.351URLpmid: 3153425
25 Gailliot M. T., Baumeister R. F., DeWall C. N., Maner J. K., Plant E. A., Tice D. M., .. Schmeichel B. J . ( 2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92( 2), 325-336.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.325URLpmid: 17279852
26 Goto T., & Kusum, T. ( 2013). How can reward contribute to efficient self-control? Reinforcement of task-defined responses diminishes ego-depletion. Motivation and Emotion, 37( 4), 726-732.
doi: 10.1007/s11031-013-9356-3URL
27 Hamilton R., Vohs K. D., Sellier A. L., & Meyvis T . ( 2011). Being of two minds: Switching mindsets exhausts self-regulatory resources. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115( 1), 13-24.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.11.005URL
28 Han D., Duhachek A., & Agrawal N . ( 2014). Emotions shape decisions through construal level: The case of guilt and shame. Journal of Consumer Research, 41( 4), 1047-1064.
doi: 10.1086/678300URL
29 Haws K. L., Bearden W. O., & Nenkov G. Y . ( 2012). Consumer spending self-control effectiveness and outcome elaboration prompts. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40( 5), 695-710.
doi: 10.1007/s11747-011-0249-2URL
30 Heatherton T. F., & Wagner, D. D . ( 2011). Cognitive neuroscience of self-regulation failure. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15( 3), 132-139.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.005URLpmid: 21273114
31 Henderson M. D., Wakslak C. J., Fujita K., & Rohrbach J . ( 2011). Construal level theory and spatial distance. Social Psychology, 42( 3), 165-173.
doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000060URL
32 Hong J., & Lee, A. Y . ( 2008). Be fit and be strong: Mastering self-regulation through regulatory fit. Journal of Consumer Research, 34( 5), 682-695.
doi: 10.1086/521902URL
33 Hu J., & Maglio, S. ( 2016, January). Construal level and temporal distance: Revisiting this relationship using subjective time format. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, Anaheim, CA.
34 Inzlicht M., & Schmeichel, B. J . ( 2012). What is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7( 5), 450-463.
doi: 10.1177/1745691612454134URLpmid: 26168503
35 Kim J., Lee S., & Rua T . ( 2015). Feeling depleted and powerless: The construal-level mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41( 4), 599-609.
doi: 10.1177/0146167215574993URL
36 Krause K., & Freund, A. M . ( 2016). It’s in the means: Process focus helps against procrastination in the academic context. Motivation and Emotion, 40( 3), 422-437.
doi: 10.1007/s11031-016-9541-2URL
37 Lee A. Y., Keller P. A., & Sternthal B . ( 2010). Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. Journal of Consumer Research, 36( 5), 735-747.
doi: 10.1086/605591URL
38 Liberman N., & Förster, J. ( 2009). Distancing from experienced self: How global-versus-local perception affects estimation of psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97( 2), 203-216.
doi: 10.1037/a0015671URL
39 Liberman N., Trope Y., McCrea S. M., & Sherman S. J . ( 2007). The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43( 1), 143-149.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.009URL
40 Lyu R. W., Lai C., & Liu J . ( 2017). The role of ego depletion in goal pursuit: A construal-level perspective. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45( 7), 1143-1156.
doi: 10.2224/sbp.6337URL
41 MacGregor K. E., Carnevale J. J., Dusthimer N. E., & Fujita K . ( 2017). Knowledge of the self-control benefits of high-level versus low-level construal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112( 4), 607-620.
doi: 10.1037/pspp0000130URLpmid: 28080098
42 Magen E., & Gross, J. J . ( 2007). Harnessing the need for immediate gratification: Cognitive reconstrual modulates the reward value of temptations. Emotion, 7( 2), 415-428.
doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.415URL
43 Malkoc S. A., Zauberman G., & Bettman J. R . ( 2010). Unstuck from the concrete: Carryover effects of abstract mindsets in intertemporal preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113( 2), 112-126.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.07.003URL
44 McCrea S. M., Liberman N., Trpe Y., & Sherman S. J . ( 2008). Construal level and procrastination. Psychological Science, 19( 12), 1308-1314.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02240.xURL
45 Metcalfe J., & Mischel, W. ( 1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106( 1), 3-19.
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3URLpmid: 10197361
46 Mischel W., & Ebbesen, E. B . ( 1970). Attention in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16( 2), 329-337.
doi: 10.1037/h0029815URL
47 Nenkov G. Y., Haws K. L ., & Kim, M. J. M. ( 2014). Fluency in future focus optimizing outcome elaboration strategies for effective self-control. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5( 7), 769-776.
doi: 10.1177/1948550614530005URL
48 Plichta M. M., Vasic N., Wolf R. C., Lesch K. P., Brummer D., Jacob C., … Grön G . ( 2009). Neural hyporesponsiveness and hyperresponsiveness during immediate and delayed reward processing in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 65( 1), 7-14.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.07.008URL
49 Price M., Higgs S., & Lee M . ( 2016). Snack intake is reduced using an implicit, high-level construal cue. Health Psychology, 35( 8), 923-937.
doi: 10.1037/hea0000322URLpmid: 27505217
50 Pronin E., Olivola C. Y., & Kennedy K. A . ( 2008). Doing unto future selves as you would do unto others: Psychological distance and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34( 2), 224-236.
doi: 10.1177/0146167207310023URL
51 Roberts, J. C . ( 2011). Construal level and prospective self-control (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). The Ohio State University.
52 Rogers T., & Bazerman, M. H . ( 2008). Future lock-in: Future implementation increases selection of ‘should’ choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106( 1), 1-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.08.001URL
53 Ronteltap A., Sijtsema S. J., Dagevos H ., & de Winter, M. A. ( 2012). Construal levels of healthy eating. Exploring consumers’ interpretation of health in the food context. Appetite, 59( 2), 333-340.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.05.023URL
54 Rummel J., Einstein G. O., & Rampey H . ( 2012). Implementation-intention encoding in a prospective memory task enhances spontaneous retrieval of intentions. Memory, 20( 8), 803-817.
doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.707214URL
55 Schmeichel B. J., & Vohs, K. ( 2009). Self-affirmation and self-control: Affirming core values counteracts ego depletion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96( 4), 770-782.
doi: 10.1037/a0014635URLpmid: 19309201
56 Schmeichel B. J., Vohs K. D., & Duke S. C . ( 2010). Self-control at high and low levels of mental construal. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2( 2), 182-189.
doi: 10.1177/1948550610385955URL
57 Shmueli D., & Prochaska, J. J . ( 2012). A test of positive affect induction for countering self-control depletion in cigarette smokers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26( 1), 157-161.
doi: 10.1037/a0023706URLpmid: 3192287
58 Sweeney A. M., & Freitas, A. L . ( 2014). Relating action to abstract goals increases physical activity reported a week later. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15( 4), 364-373.
doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.03.009URL
59 Terada M., ( 2017). Effect of individual differences in construal level on procrastination: moderating role of intelligence theories. Psychology, 8( 4), 74582.
60 Trope Y., & Liberman, N. ( 2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110( 3), 403-421.
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403URL
61 Trope Y., & Liberman, N. ( 2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117( 2), 440-463.
doi: 10.1037/a0018963URLpmid: 20438233
62 Trope Y., Liberman N., & Wakslak C . ( 2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17( 2), 83-95.
doi: 10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-XURL
63 Vallacher R. R., & Wegner, D. M . ( 1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57( 4), 660-671.
doi: 10.1515/cog-2015-0052URL
64 van Beek J., Handgraaf M. J. J., & Antonides G . ( 2017). Time orientation and construal level: Effects on eating and exercising behaviour and preferences. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41( 1), 54-60.
doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12313URL
65 Verbruggen F., & Logan, G. D . ( 2009). Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33( 5), 647-661.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.014URLpmid: 2696813
66 Volokhov R. N., & Demaree, H. A . ( 2010). Spontaneous emotion regulation to positive and negative stimuli. Brain and Cognition, 73( 1), 1-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.10.015URLpmid: 20347515
67 Wan E. W., & Agrawal, N. ( 2011). Carryover effects of self-control on decision making: A construal-level perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 38( 1), 199-214.
doi: 10.1086/658471URL
68 Watkins E., Moberly N. J., & Moulds M. L . ( 2008). Processing mode causally influences emotional reactivity: Distinct effects of abstract versus concrete construal on emotional response. Emotion, 8( 3), 364-378.
doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.8.3.364URL
69 Wieber F., Sezer L. A., & Gollwitzer P. M . ( 2014). Asking “why” helps action control by goals but not plans. Motivation and Emotion, 38( 1), 65-78.
doi: 10.1007/s11031-013-9364-3URL
70 Yi R., Stuppy-Sullivan A., Pickover A., & Landes R. D . ( 2017). Impact of construal level manipulations on delay discounting. PLoS One, 12( 5), e0177240.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177240URLpmid: 28542259




[1]何嘉梅, 金磊. 目标概念的辨析及其对决策的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(8): 1410-1419.
[2]孙国晓, 张力为. 竞赛压力、注意控制与运动表现关系的理论演进[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 1122-1130.
[3]刘毅, 王君起, 邬辛佳. 双系统模型视角下的罪犯自我控制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(8): 1379-1391.
[4]李才文, 臧奋英, 禤宇明, 傅小兰. 对威胁刺激的碰撞时间估计[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(10): 1650-1661.
[5]刘永芳, 范雯健, 侯日霞. 从理论到研究, 再到应用:塞勒及其贡献[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 381-393.
[6]严瑜, 曹照雪. 工作场所文明行为:从内隐的自我提升到外显的组织优化[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(11): 1906-1916.
[7]陈琳, 田晓明, 段锦云. 建议采纳的认知机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(1): 149-159.
[8]王艳芝, 姚唐, 卢宏亮. 结伴购物情境下消费者冲动购买行为发生机理[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(11): 1915-1927.
[9]利振华, 窦凯, 聂衍刚. 远离“诱惑”:预先承诺对跨期决策的调控机制及其神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(10): 1869-1877.
[10]董军, 付淑英, 卢山, 杨绍峰, 齐春辉. 自我控制失败的理论模型与神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(1): 134-143.
[11]潘爱玲, 胥遥山, 李永娟. 自我损耗对工作场所安全的影响及缓解途径[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(8): 1261-1273.
[12]李明晖, 饶俪琳. 解释水平视角下的道德判断[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(8): 1423-1430.
[13]项明强;张力为;张阿佩;杨红英. 自我损耗对运动表现影响的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(4): 570-585.
[14]王财玉;雷雳;吴波. 伦理消费者为何“言行不一”:解释水平的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(3): 511-522.
[15]蒋多, 何贵兵. 心理距离视角下的行为决策[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(11): 1992-2001.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4484
相关话题/心理 科学 控制 基础 运动

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 为他人做决策:多维度心理机制与决策体验
    陆静怡*(),尚雪松华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海200062收稿日期:2017-12-24出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:陆静怡E-mail:jylu@psy.ecnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金(71771088);上海市教育发展基金会和上 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 舌尖上的“自虐”——食辣中的心理学问题
    傅于玲1,2,邓富民1,*(),杨帅3,徐玖平11四川大学商学院,成都6100412成都理工大学心理健康教育中心,成都6100593重庆邮电大学教育发展研究院,重庆400065收稿日期:2017-10-16出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:邓富民E-mail:de ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 数字效应对消费者行为的影响及其心理机制
    吴莹皓,蒋晶*()中国人民大学商学院,北京100872收稿日期:2017-08-02出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:蒋晶E-mail:jiangjing@rmbs.ruc.edu.cnThenumerosityeffectsinconsumerbehaviorW ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 自闭症谱系障碍者抑制控制的影响因素及神经机制
    孙岩1(),房林1,王亭予1,崔丽21辽宁师范大学心理学院,大连1160292大连小海豚自闭症儿童康复中心,大连116000收稿日期:2017-05-31出版日期:2018-08-15发布日期:2018-07-02通讯作者:孙岩E-mail:sun9199@163.com基金资助:教育部人文社会科学 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 视觉表象个体差异及其神经基础
    叶晓燕1,张得龙1,常松2,刘鸣1()1南师范大学心理学院,广州5106312东大学教育科学学院,山东烟台264025收稿日期:2017-06-20出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29通讯作者:刘鸣E-mail:liuming@scnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 信任的遗传基础:来自基因的证据
    董妍(),于晓琪,李哲能中国人民大学心理学系,北京100872收稿日期:2017-08-22出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29通讯作者:董妍E-mail:dong8958@126.com基金资助:国家自然科学基金青年项目(31500905)Thegeneticbasicof ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 移动健康的理论基础与效果评估
    段文杰(),张洁文,何雷武汉大学社会学系,武汉430072收稿日期:2018-04-20出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29通讯作者:段文杰E-mail:duan.w@whu.edu.cn基金资助:国家社科基金青年项目(17CSH073);国家社科基金重大项目(16ZDA08 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 冲突解决过程中认知控制的注意调节机制 *
    李政汉1,2,杨国春1,2,南威治3,李琦1,2,刘勋1,2()1中国科学院行为科学重点实验室,北京1001012中国科学院大学,北京1000493广州大学教育学院心理系脑与认知科学中心,广州510006收稿日期:2017-07-21出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 语言认知神经科学研究中的脑沟形态分析 *
    崔新1,苏萌萌2,舒华1()1北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,北京1008752首都师范大学初等教育学院,北京100048收稿日期:2017-02-22出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:舒华E-mail:shuhua@bnu.edu.cn基金资助:* ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 喜欢悲伤音乐的心理机制 *
    王丁,王超,李红()深圳大学心理与社会学院,深圳518060收稿日期:2017-05-23出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:李红E-mail:lihongszu@szu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(31671150);广东省普通高校创新团队建设项 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01