陆静怡*(), 尚雪松

华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院, 上海 200062

收稿日期:2017-12-24出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30
通讯作者:陆静怡E-mail:jylu@psy.ecnu.edu.cn

基金资助:国家自然科学基金(71771088);上海市教育发展基金会和上海市教育委员会“晨光计划”(16CG29)

Making decisions for others: Multi-dimensional psychological mechanisms and decision feelings

LU Jingyi*(), SHANG Xuesong

School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

Received:2017-12-24Online:2018-09-15Published:2018-07-30
Contact:Jingyi LU E-mail:jylu@psy.ecnu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在管理咨询、代理投资等行业, 甚至是日常生活中, 人们都不可避免地需要为他人做决策。因此, 探讨为他人决策者的决策规律逐渐成为研究热点。然而, 现有研究多关注为他人决策者的个人心理机制, 忽视了人际心理机制; 多关注决策结果, 忽略了决策体验。本项目拟探索(1)为他人决策者的个人与人际心理机制; (2)为他人决策者的决策体验的规律, 以及这些规律如何受多维度心理机制的影响; (3)为他人决策者的个体差异如何影响多维度心理机制与决策体验。最终希望构建一个完整的关于为他人决策者的多维度心理机制与决策体验的理论模型。

参考文献

1 简新华 . ( 1998). 委托代理风险与国有企业改革. 经济研究, ( 9), 44-49. 2 刘翠翠, 陈彬, 刘磊鑫, 原献学, 汪祚军 . ( 2013). 当局者迷, 旁观者清? 自我-他人决策的理性差异及其机制. 心理科学进展, 21, 879-885. 3 刘永芳, 王鹏, 庄锦英, 钟俊, 孙庆洲, 刘毅 . ( 2014). 自我-他人决策差异: 问题、研究与思考. 心理科学进展, 22, 580-587. 4 人力资源和社会保障部. ( 2017a. 2016年人力资源市场统计报告. 2017-12-15取自 5 人力资源和社会保障部. ( 2017b. 人力资源服务业发展行动计划. 2017-12-15取自 6 尚雪松 . ( 2017). 决策者角色与信息类型对广告说服效果的影响 (硕士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海. 7 王晓田, 陆静怡 . ( 2016). 进化的智慧与决策的理性. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社. 8 新华网 . ( 2016. 中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十三个五年规划纲要. 2017-12-15取自 9 徐惊蛰, 谢晓非 . ( 2011). 解释水平视角下的自己-他人决策差异. 心理学报, 43, 11-20. 10 张慧, 陆静怡, 谢晓非 . ( 2014). 解释水平导致的自己-他人决策差异. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 50, 1124-1132. 11 中国日报. ( 2016. 软实力观察: 中国咨询业发展研究报告白皮书. 2017-12-15取自 12 Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. ( 1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117-132. 13 Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. ( 2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451-482. 14 Higgins, E. T. ( 2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230. 15 Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. ( 1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. 16 Jung D., Sul S., & Kim H. ( 2013). Dissociable neural processes underlying risky decisions for self versus other. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 15. 17 Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. ( 1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292. 18 Kray, L., & Gonzalez, R. ( 1999). Differential weighting in choice versus advice: I’ll do this, you do that. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 207-217. 19 Kray, L. J. ( 2000). Contingent weighting in self-other decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 82-106. 20 Kruger J., Burrus J., & Kressel L. M. ( 2009). Between a rock and a hard place: Damned if you do, damned if you don’t. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1286-1290. 21 Leonhardt J. M., Keller L. R., & Pechmann C. ( 2011). Avoiding the risk of responsibility by seeking uncertainty: Responsibility aversion and preference for indirect agency when choosing for others. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 405-413. 22 Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. ( 1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255-257. 23 Lin, H.-C. ( 2015). Moderating roles on individuals’ decisions when making choices for others. Food Quality and Preference, 39, 221-227. 24 Liviatan I., Trope Y., & Liberman N. ( 2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1256-1269. 25 Lu J., Jia H., Xie X., & Wang Q. ( 2016). Missing the best opportunity; who can seize the next one? Agents show less inaction inertia than personal decision makers. Journal of Economic Psychology, 54, 100-112. 26 Lu J., Liang Y., & Duan H. ( 2017). Justifying decisions: Making choices for others enhances preferences for impoverished options. Social Psychology, 48, 92-103. 27 Lu J., Liu Z., & Fang Z. ( 2016). Hedonic products for you, utilitarian products for me. Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 332-341. 28 Lu, J., & Xie, X. ( 2014). To change or not to change: A matter of decision maker’s role. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124, 47-55. 29 Lu J., Xie X., & Xu J. ( 2013). Desirability or feasibility: Self-other decision-making differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 144-155. 30 Matz S. C., Gladstone J. J., & Stillwell D. ( 2016). Money buys happiness when spending fits our personality. Psychological Science, 27, 715-725. 31 Mishra, S. ( 2014). Decision-making under risk: Integrating perspectives from biology, economics, and psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 280-307. 32 Pachur T., Hertwig R., & Wolkewitz R. ( 2014). The affect gap in risky choice: Affect-rich outcomes attenuate attention to probability information. Decision, 1, 64-78. 33 Parker J. R., Lehmann D. R., & Xie Y. ( 2016). Decision comfort. Journal of Consumer Research, 43, 113-133. 34 Patalano A. L., Weizenbaum E. L., Lolli S. L., & Anderson A. ( 2015). Maximization and search for alternatives in decision situations with and without loss of options. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28, 411-423. 35 Payne J. W., Bettman J. R., & Johnson E. J. ( 1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87-131. 36 Pham, M. T. ( 2013). The seven sins of consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 411-423. 37 Polman, E. ( 2010). Why are maximizers less happy than satisficers? Because they maximize positive and negative outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 179-190. 38 Polman, E. ( 2012 a). Effects of self-other decision making on regulatory focus and choice overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 980-993. 39 Polman, E. ( 2012 b). Self-other decision making and loss aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119, 141-150. 40 Polman, E., & Vohs, K. D. ( 2016). Decision fatigue, choosing for others, and self-construal. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 471-478. 41 Ross, S. A. ( 1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. American Economic Review, 63, 134-139. 42 Simon, H. A. ( 1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1-19. 43 Simonson, I., & Nowlis, S. M. ( 2000). The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: Unconventional choices based on reasons. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 49-68. 44 Steffel M., Williams E. F., & Perrmann-Graham J. ( 2016). Passing the buck: Delegating choices to others to avoid responsibility and blame. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 135, 32-44. 45 Stone, E. R., & Allgaier, L. ( 2008). A social values analysis of self-other differences in decision making involving risk. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 114-129. 46 Stone E. R., Choi Y., de Bruin W. B., & Mandel D. R. ( 2013). I can take the risk, but you should be safe: Self-other differences in situations involving physical safety. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 250-267. 47 Su Y., Rao L.-L., Sun H.-Y., Du X.-L., Li X., & Li S. ( 2013). Is making a risky choice based on a weighting and adding process? An eye-tracking investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1765-1780. 48 Sun Q., Liu Y., Zhang H., & Lu J. ( 2017). Increased social distance makes people more risk-neutral. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157, 502-512. 49 Tsai, C. I., & McGill, A. L. ( 2011). No pain, no gain? How fluency and construal level affect consumer confidence. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 807-821. 50 Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. ( 1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59, S251-S278. 51 von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O.( 1944) . Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 52 Zemack-Rugar Y., Rabino R., Cavanaugh L. A., & Fitzsimons G. J. ( 2016). When donating is liberating: The role of product and consumer characteristics in the appeal of cause-related products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26, 213-230.

相关文章 15

[1]	钱柳, 汝涛涛, 罗雪, 牛佳兴, 马永骏, 周国富. 睡眠限制对认知功能的影响及其潜在作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(9): 1493-1507.
[2]	赵鹤宾, 夏勉, 曹奔, 江光荣. 接触干预在减少精神障碍公众污名中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(5): 843-857.
[3]	叶晓燕, 张得龙, 常松, 刘鸣. 视觉表象个体差异及其神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(7): 1186-1192.
[4]	叶晓燕, 张得龙, 倪冰, 董霁月, 蔡红杰. 基于心理旋转范式探讨视觉表象的个体差异[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(suppl.): 37-37.
[5]	杨建锋;明晓东. 中国情境下团队伦理决策的过程机制及影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(4): 542-552.
[6]	杨群; 李煜; 孙得琳; Tatia M. C. LEE. 应激对风险和社会决策的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(6): 974-984.
[7]	冯雪;彭凯平. 技能和风格：理性思维的两种测量途径[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(9): 1550-1559.
[8]	王妍;杨娟. 人格特质对个体心理性应激反应的调节作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(8): 1453-1460.
[9]	张秀平;杨晓虹;杨玉芳. 语篇理解中语义整合的神经机制及其影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(7): 1130-1141.
[10]	邱方晖;罗跃嘉;贾世伟. 面部表情的类别知觉及其个体差异[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(6): 946-958.
[11]	左婷婷;胡清芬. 空间认知风格及其与空间能力的关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(6): 959-966.
[12]	李彬;徐富明;王伟;张慧;罗寒冰. 决策的加工过程及个体差异：模糊痕迹理论视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(2): 316-324.
[13]	江俊;王梓梦;万璇;蒋存梅. 音乐时间加工的影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(4): 650-658.
[14]	陈江涛;唐丹丹;刘聪丛;陈安涛. 注意瞬脱效应的个体差异[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(10): 1564-1572.
[15]	周蕾;李纾;许燕;梁竹苑. 决策风格的理论发展及建构：基于信息加工视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(1): 112-121.

PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4447