删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

数字效应对消费者行为的影响及其心理机制

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

吴莹皓, 蒋晶*()
中国人民大学商学院, 北京 100872
收稿日期:2017-08-02出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30
通讯作者:蒋晶E-mail:jiangjing@rmbs.ruc.edu.cn



The numerosity effects in consumer behavior

WU Yinghao, JIANG Jing*()
School of Business, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
Received:2017-08-02Online:2018-09-15Published:2018-07-30
Contact:Jing JIANG E-mail:jiangjing@rmbs.ruc.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 经济学理性人假说判定, 个体对同一个事物的认知和需求不会随事物表征方式以及个体信息处理方式的改变而改变。同时, 消费者旨在运用最低成本获得最大收益, 实现经济效用最大化。然而消费者行为领域的****对此提出了相反的主张。他们指出, 当个体解读刺激物数量化属性时, 不仅会对用不同数字和单位表征的同一数量判断出现偏差, 还会受到数字启动的影响, 对用不同数字表示的同一商品产生不同的需求, 甚至做出违反经济效用最大化的决策, 产生了数字效应。不同的心理机制对数字效应如何导致消费者非理性行为进行了解释。在此基础上, 对数字效应在消费者行为领域的未来研究方向进行了展望。


1 Adaval, R. ( 2013). Numerosity and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 39( 5), xi-xiv.
2 Adaval, R., & Monroe, K. B. ( 2002). Automatic construction and use of contextual information for product and price evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 28( 4), 572-588.
3 Backus M., Blake T., & Tadelis S. ( 2015). Cheap talk, round numbers, and the economics of negotiation. NBER Working Paper, No. 21285.
4 Bagchi, R., & Li, X. B. ( 2011). Illusionary progress in loyalty programs: Magnitudes, reward distances, and step-size ambiguity. Journal of Consumer Research, 37( 5), 888-901.
5 Baird J. C., Lewis C., & Romer D. ( 1970). Relative frequencies of numerical responses in ratio estimation. Perception & Psychophysics, 8( 5), 358-362.
6 Bem, S. L., & Steven, A. L. ( 1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31( 4), 634-643.
7 Bettman J. R., Luce M. F., & Payne J. W. ( 1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25( 3), 187-217.
8 Brenner, G. A., & Brenner, R. ( 1982). Memory and markets, or why are you paying $2.99 for a widget?. The Journal of Business, 55( 1), 147-158.
9 Cai F. Y., Shen H., & Hui M. K. ( 2012). The effect of location on price estimation: Understanding number- location and number-order associations. Journal of Marketing Research, 49( 5), 718-724.
10 Chandon, P., & Wansink, B. ( 2006). How biased household inventory estimates distort shopping and storage decisions. Journal of Marketing, 70( 4), 118-135.
11 Chen, H. P., & Rao, A. R. ( 2007). When two plus two is not equal to four: Errors in processing multiple percentage changes. Journal of Consumer Research, 34( 3), 327-340.
12 Dehaene S., Bossini S., & Giraux P. ( 1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122( 3), 371-396.
13 Dehaene S., Dupoux E., & Mehler J. ( 1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16( 3), 626-641.
14 Fazio R. H., Chen J. M., McDonel E. C., & Sherman S. J. ( 1982). Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18( 4), 339-357.
15 Higgins E. T., Rholes W. S., & Jones C. R. ( 1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13( 2), 141-154.
16 Hinrichs J. V., Berie J. L., & Mosell M. K. ( 1982). Place information in multidigit number comparison. Memory & Cognition, 10( 5), 487-495.
17 Hinrichs J. V., Yurko D. S., & Hu J. M. ( 1981). Two-digit number comparison: Use of place information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7( 4), 890-901.
18 Isaac, M. S., & Schindler, R. M. ( 2014). The top-ten effect: Consumers' subjective categorization of ranked lists. Journal of Consumer Research, 40( 6), 1181-1202.
19 Jerez-Fernandez A., Angulo A. N., & Oppenheimer D. M. ( 2014). Show me the numbers: Precision as a cue to others’ confidence. Psychological Science, 25( 2), 633-635.
20 Kaufman E. L., Lord M. W., Reese T. W., & Volkmann J. ( 1949). The discrimination of visual number. The American Journal of Psychology, 62( 4), 498-525.
21 King, D., & Janiszewski, C. ( 2011). The sources and consequences of the fluent processing of numbers. Journal of Marketing Research, 48( 2), 327-341.
22 Labroo, A. A., & Kim, S. ( 2009). The “instrumentality” heuristic: Why metacognitive difficulty is desirable during goal pursuit. Psychological Science, 20( 1), 127-134.
23 Lakoff, G. ( 1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
24 Lambert, Z. V. ( 1975). Perceived prices as related to odd and even price endings. Journal of Retailing, 51( 3), 45-56.
25 Lawless, J. L. ( 2004). Women, war, and winning elections: Gender stereotyping in the post-September 11th era. Political Research Quarterly, 57( 3), 479-490.
26 Madzharov, A. V., & Block, L. G. ( 2010). Effects of product unit image on consumption of snack foods. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20( 4), 398-409.
27 Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R.( 1995) . Microeconomic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
28 Monga, A., & Bagchi, R. ( 2012). Years, months, and days versus 1, 12, and 365: The influence of units versus numbers. Journal of Consumer Research, 39( 1), 185-198.
29 Monroe, K. B., & Lee, A. Y. ( 1999). Remembering versus knowing: Issues in buyers’ processing of price information. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27( 2), 207-225.
30 Nijs V. R., Srinivasan S., & Pauwels K. ( 2007). Retail- price drivers and retailer profits. Marketing Science, 26( 4), 473-487.
31 Palmeira, M. M. ( 2011). The zero-comparison effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 38( 1), 16-26.
32 Pandelaere M., Briers B., & Lembregts C. ( 2011). How to make a 29% increase look bigger: The unit effect in option comparisons. Journal of Consumer Research, 38( 2), 308-322.
33 Pelham B. W., Sumarta T. T., & Myaskovsky L. ( 1994). The easy path from many to much: The numerosity heuristic. Cognitive Psychology, 26( 2), 103-133.
34 Pena-Marin, J., & Bhargave, R. ( 2016). Lasting performance: Round numbers activate associations of stability and increase perceived length of product benefits. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26( 3), 410-416.
35 Raghubir, P., & Krishna, A. ( 1999). Vital dimensions in volume perception: Can the eye fool the stomach?. Journal of Marketing Research, 36( 3), 313-326.
36 Raghubir, P., & Srivastava, J. ( 2002). Effect of face value on product valuation in foreign currencies. Journal of Consumer Research, 29( 3), 335-347.
37 Schindler, R. M., & Kirby, P. N. ( 1997). Patterns of rightmost digits used in advertised prices: Implications for nine-ending effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 24( 2), 192-201.
38 Schindler, R., & Yalch, R. F. ( 2006). It seems factual, but is it? Effects of using sharp versus round numbers in advertising claims. Advances in Consumer Research, 33, 586-590.
39 Schwarz, N. ( 2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14( 4), 332-348.
40 Spence J. T., Helmreich R. L., & Holahan C. K. ( 1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37( 10), 1673-1682.
41 Stiving, M., & Winer, R. S. ( 1997). An empirical analysis of price endings with scanner data. Journal of Consumer Research, 24( 1), 57-67.
42 Thomas, M., & Morwitz, V. G. ( 2005). Penny wise and pound foolish: The left-digit effect in price cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 32( 1), 54-64.
43 Thomas M., Simon D. H., & Kadiyali V. ( 2010). The price precision effect: Evidence from laboratory and market data. Marketing Science, 29( 1), 175-190.
44 Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. ( 2010). Construal level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117( 2), 440-463.
45 Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. ( 1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5( 2), 207-232.
46 Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. ( 1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185( 4157), 1124-1131.
47 Wadhwa, M., & Zhang, K. J. ( 2015). This number just feels right: The impact of roundedness of price numbers on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 41( 5), 1172-1185.
48 Wansink B., Kent R. J., & Hoch S. J. ( 1998). An anchoring and adjustment model of purchase quantity decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 35( 1), 71-81.
49 Wilkie, J. E. B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. ( 2015). The numerology of gender: Gendered perceptions of even and odd numbers. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 810.
50 Xie, G. X., & Kronrod, A. ( 2012). Is the devil in the details?. Journal of Advertising, 41( 4), 103-117.
51 Yan, D. F. ( 2016). Numbers are gendered: The role of numerical precision. Journal of Consumer Research, 43( 2), 303-316.
52 Zaltman, G., & Coulter, R. H. ( 1995). Seeing the voice of the customer: Metaphor-based advertising research. Journal of Advertising Research, 35( 4), 35-51.
53 Zhang, Y. C., & Schwarz, N. ( 2012). How and why 1 year differs from 365 days: A conversational logic analysis of inferences from the granularity of quantitative expressions. Journal of Consumer Research, 39( 2), 248-259.




[1]谢志鹏, 肖婷婷, 秦环宇. 文字的“偷心术”:营销中的字体效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 365-380.
[2]谢志鹏, 赵晶, 汪涛. 消费者一定偏爱“笑脸”吗?产品外观中的表情元素对消费者的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(8): 1256-1272.
[3]杨权, 尹述飞, 胡兴. 跨期选择中的年龄差异及其机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(6): 987-993.
[4]董波, 王成瑜, 张秀玲, 张天阳. 地面参照框架形成的连续表面整合加工假说[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(12): 2000-2007.
[5]谢莹, 李纯青, 高鹏, 刘艺. 直播营销中社会临场感对线上从众消费的影响及作用机理研究——行为与神经生理视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(6): 990-1004.
[6]侯春娜, 刘志军. 心理表征的可视化途径:基于噪音的反向相关图像分类技术[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 465-474.
[7]赖燕群, 杨琪, 黄宝珍, 赛李阳. 记忆的顿悟优势效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(12): 2034-2042.
[8]杜碧煊, 张明明, 张珂烨, 任杰, 何蔚祺. 肢体形状和肢体动作表征的早期发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(10): 1703-1712.
[9]李杨卓, 杨旭成, 高虹, 高湘萍. 工作记忆表征对视觉注意的影响:基于非目标模板的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(9): 1608-1616.
[10]叶晓燕, 张得龙, 常松, 刘鸣. 视觉表象个体差异及其神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(7): 1186-1192.
[11]魏华, 段海岑, 周宗奎. 具身认知视角下的消费者行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(7): 1294-1306.
[12]岳童, 黄希庭, 刘光远. 催产素对共情反应的影响及其作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(3): 442-453.
[13]於文苑, 刘烨, 傅小兰. 可操作物体识别过程中的两种操作动作表征[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(2): 229-240.
[14]李晓明, 谭谱. 框架效应的应用研究及其应用技巧[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(12): 2230-2237.
[15]邓之君, 吴慧中, 陈英和. 数字空间联结的工作记忆机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(9): 1492-1502.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4461
相关话题/心理 科学 数字 神经 工作

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 基于知觉的恐惧泛化的认知神经机制
    雷怡1,2,3(),梅颖1,2,3,张文海4,李红1,2,31深圳大学心理与社会学院2深圳市情绪与社会认知科学重点实验室3深圳市神经科学研究院,深圳5180004江苏省盐城工学院心理健康教育中心,盐城224003收稿日期:2017-02-23出版日期:2018-08-15发布日期:2018-07-0 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 啮齿动物主动母性行为动态改变的神经机制
    张一帆1,齐星亮2,蔡厚德1,2()1南京师范大学心理学院,南京2100972南京晓庄学院幼儿师范学院,南京211171收稿日期:2017-06-06出版日期:2018-08-15发布日期:2018-07-02通讯作者:蔡厚德E-mail:caihoude@163.com基金资助:国家社科基金教育学 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 自闭症谱系障碍者抑制控制的影响因素及神经机制
    孙岩1(),房林1,王亭予1,崔丽21辽宁师范大学心理学院,大连1160292大连小海豚自闭症儿童康复中心,大连116000收稿日期:2017-05-31出版日期:2018-08-15发布日期:2018-07-02通讯作者:孙岩E-mail:sun9199@163.com基金资助:教育部人文社会科学 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 工作重塑干预:对员工工作自主性的培养
    徐长江(),陈实浙江师范大学心理学系,金华321004收稿日期:2017-03-08出版日期:2018-08-15发布日期:2018-07-02通讯作者:徐长江E-mail:xucj@zjnu.cnTheinterventionsofjobcrafting:Acultivationofemploye ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 手写体文字识别的特点及神经机制
    任晓倩1,方娴1,隋雪1(),吴岩2()1宁师范大学心理学院;儿童青少年健康人格评定与培养协同创新中心,大连1160292北师范大学心理学院,长春130024收稿日期:2017-09-27出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29通讯作者:隋雪,吴岩E-mail:suixue88@ ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 早期应激对情绪调节的影响及其神经机制
    张慧会,张亮()中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049收稿日期:2016-09-12出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29通讯作者:张亮E-mail:zhangl@psych.ac.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金通用技术基础研究联合基金重点支持项目《基于脑机接口的情绪识别与交 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 视觉表象个体差异及其神经基础
    叶晓燕1,张得龙1,常松2,刘鸣1()1南师范大学心理学院,广州5106312东大学教育科学学院,山东烟台264025收稿日期:2017-06-20出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29通讯作者:刘鸣E-mail:liuming@scnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 工作场所不文明行为受害者向实施者反转的机制
    严瑜(),李彤武汉大学哲学学院心理学系,武汉430072收稿日期:2017-06-20出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29通讯作者:严瑜E-mail:yanyu@whu.edu.cn基金资助:教育部一般人文社科研究规划基金项目(组织不文明行为溢出效应和交叉效应的心理机制)(1 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 语言认知神经科学研究中的脑沟形态分析 *
    崔新1,苏萌萌2,舒华1()1北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,北京1008752首都师范大学初等教育学院,北京100048收稿日期:2017-02-22出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:舒华E-mail:shuhua@bnu.edu.cn基金资助:* ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 喜欢悲伤音乐的心理机制 *
    王丁,王超,李红()深圳大学心理与社会学院,深圳518060收稿日期:2017-05-23出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:李红E-mail:lihongszu@szu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(31671150);广东省普通高校创新团队建设项 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01