删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

工作记忆表征对视觉注意的影响:基于非目标模板的视角

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

李杨卓, 杨旭成, 高虹, 高湘萍*()
上海师范大学教育学院心理系, 上海 200234
收稿日期:2017-08-28出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30
通讯作者:高湘萍E-mail:gaoxp@shnu.edu.cn



The role of working memory representation in visual search: The perspective of non-target template

LI Yangzhuo, YANG Xucheng, GAO Hong, GAO Xiangping*()
Department of Psychology, School of Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
Received:2017-08-28Online:2018-09-15Published:2018-07-30
Contact:Xiangping GAO E-mail:gaoxp@shnu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 储存在工作记忆中的视觉表征会影响注意选择过程。其中, 与目标有关的工作记忆表征(靶子模板)对视觉注意起到自上而下的引导作用, 而与目标无关的工作记忆表征(非目标模板)亦会对注意分配产生影响。本文通过系统分析非目标工作记忆表征影响视觉搜索过程的相关研究, 发现非目标模板在视觉搜索任务中既存在自动化的注意捕获, 也会形成主动抑制以提高目标搜索绩效。进一步地, 对非目标模板的注意捕获或抑制受实验范式、任务难度、刺激材料特征以及认知控制水平等因素的影响。未来研究应该在不断深入细化变量操纵、完善变量控制的同时, 进一步扩展应用领域的研究。


1 胡艳梅, 张明, 徐展, 李毕琴 . ( 2013). 客体工作记忆对注意的导向作用: 抑制动机的影响. 心理学报, 45( 2), 127-138.
2 胡艳梅, 张明 . ( 2016). 基于记忆的注意捕获和注意抑制效应: ERP证据. 心理学报, 48( 1), 12-21.
3 纪丽燕, 陈宁轩, 丁锦红, 魏萍 . ( 2015). 奖赏预期调节局部注意干扰效应. 心理学报, 47( 6), 721-733.
4 于斌, 乐国安, 刘惠军 . ( 2014). 工作记忆能力与自我调控. 心理科学进展, 22( 5), 772-781.
5 张豹, 胡岑楼, 黄赛 . ( 2016). 认知控制在工作记忆表征引导注意中的作用: 来自眼动的证据. 心理学报, 48( 9), 1105-1118.
6 张豹, 黄赛, 候秋霞 . ( 2014). 工作记忆表征捕获眼动中的颜色优先性. 心理学报, 46( 1), 17-26.
7 张明, 张阳 . ( 2007). 工作记忆与选择性注意的交互关系. 心理科学进展, 15( 1), 8-15.
8 Anderson B. A., Laurent P. A., & Yantis S. ( 2013). Reward predictions bias attentional selection. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7: 262.
9 Anderson D. E., Vogel E. K., & Awh E. ( 2013). A common discrete resource for visual working memory and visual search. Psychological Science, 24( 6), 929-938.
10 Arita J. T., Carlisle N. B., & Woodman G. F. ( 2012). Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38( 3), 580-584.
11 Beck, V. M., & Hollingworth, A. ( 2015). Evidence for negative feature guidance in visual search is explained by spatial recoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41( 5), 1190-1196.
12 Becker M. W., Hemsteger S., & Peltier C. ( 2015). No templates for rejection: A failure to configure attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. Visual Cognition, 23( 9-10), 1150-1167.
13 Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. ( 1998). What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?. Brain Research Reviews, 28( 3), 309-369.
14 Bucker, B., & Theeuwes, J. ( 2017). Pavlovian reward learning underlies value driven attentional capture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79( 2), 415-428.
15 Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. ( 2011). When memory is not enough: Electrophysiological evidence for goal-dependent use of working memory representations in guiding visual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23( 10), 2650-2664.
16 Chelazzi L., Duncan J., Miller E. K., & Desimone R. ( 1998). Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80( 6), 2918-2940.
17 Chelazzi L., Perlato A., Santandrea E., & Della Libera C. ( 2013). Rewards teach visual selective attention. Vision research, 85, 58-72.
18 Desimone, R. ( 1998). Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 353( 1373), 1245-1255.
19 Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. ( 1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual review of neuroscience, 18( 1), 193-222.
20 Dodd, M. D., & Flowers, J. ( Eds.). ( 2012). The influence of attention, learning, and motivation on visual search. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 59( 1-4).
21 Dowd E. W., Kiyonaga A., Egner T., & Mitroff S. R. ( 2015). Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: An individual-differences approach. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77( 3), 704-712.
22 Downing, P. E. ( 2000). Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychological Science, 11( 6), 467-473.
23 Downing, P., & Dodds, C. M. ( 2004). Competition in visual working memory for control of search. Visual Cognition, 11( 6), 689-703.
24 Gaspar, J. M., & McDonald, J. J. ( 2014). Suppression of salient objects prevents distraction in visual search. Journal of neuroscience, 34( 16), 5658-5666.
25 Geng, J. J. ( 2014). Attentional mechanisms of distractor suppression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23( 2), 147-153.
26 Geng, J. J., & DiQuattro, N. E. ( 2010). Attentional capture by a perceptually salient non-target facilitates target processing through inhibition and rapid rejection. Journal of Vision, 10( 6), 5-5.
27 Gong, M. Y., & Li, S. ( 2014). Learned reward association improves visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40( 2), 841-856.
28 Gong M. Y., Jia K., & Li S. ( 2017). Perceptual competition promotes suppression of reward salience in behavioral selection and neural representation. Journal of Neuroscience, 37( 26), 6242-6252.
29 Gong M. Y., Yang F., & Li S. ( 2016). Reward association facilitates distractor suppression in human visual search. European Journal of Neuroscience, 43( 7), 942-953.
30 Han, S. W., & Kim, M. S. ( 2009). Do the contents of working memory capture attention? Yes, but cognitive control matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35( 5), 1292-1302.
31 Hickey C., Chelazzi L., & Theeuwes J. ( 2010). Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate. Journal of Neuroscience, 30( 33), 11096-11103.
32 Hickey C., McDonald J. J., & Theeuwes J. ( 2006). Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18( 4), 604-613.
33 Hu Y., Xu Z., & Hitch G. J. ( 2011). Strategic and automatic effects of visual working memory on attention in visual search. Visual Cognition, 19( 6), 799-816.
34 Kiyonaga A., Egner T., & Soto D. ( 2012). Cognitive control over working memory biases of selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19( 4), 639-646.
35 Kumar S., Soto D., & Humphreys G. W. ( 2009). Electrophysiological evidence for attentional guidance by the contents of working memory. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30( 2), 307-317.
36 Mevorach C., Hodsoll J., Allen H., Shalev L., & Humphreys G. ( 2010). Ignoring the elephant in the room: a neural circuit to downregulate salience. Journal of Neuroscience, 30( 17), 6072-6079.
37 Mine, C., & Saiki, J. ( 2015). Task-irrelevant stimulus-reward association induces value-driven attentional capture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77( 6), 1896-1907.
38 Olivers, C. N. L. ( 2009). What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35( 5), 1275-1291.
39 Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. ( 2003). Visual marking inhibits singleton capture. Cognitive Psychology, 47( 1), 1-42.
40 Olivers C. N. L., Meijer F., & Theeuwes J. ( 2006). Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32( 5), 1243-1265.
41 Olivers C. N. L., Peters J., Houtkamp R., & Roelfsema P. R. ( 2011). Different states in visual working memory: When it guides attention and when it does not. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15( 7), 327-334.
42 Pessoa, L., & Engelmann, J. B. ( 2010). Embedding reward signals into perception and cognition. Frontiers in neuroscience, 4: 17.
43 Peters J. C., Goebel R., & Roelfsema P. R. ( 2009). Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21( 6), 1081-1091.
44 Sawaki R., Geng J. J., & Luck S. J. ( 2012). A common neural mechanism for preventing and terminating the allocation of attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 32( 31), 10725-10736.
45 Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. ( 2010). Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72( 6), 1455-1470.
46 Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. ( 2011). Active suppression of distractors that match the contents of visual working memory. Visual Cognition, 19( 7), 956-972.
47 Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. ( 2013). Active suppression after involuntary capture of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20( 2), 296-301.
48 Soto D., Greene C. M., Chaudhary A., & Rotshtein P. ( 2011). Competition in working memory reduces frontal guidance of visual selection. Cerebral Cortex, 22( 5), 1159-1169.
49 Soto D., Heinke D., Humphreys G. W., & Blanco M. J. ( 2005). Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31( 2), 248-261.
50 Soto D., Hodsoll J., Rotshtein P., & Humphreys G. W. ( 2008). Automatic guidance of attention from working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12( 9), 342-348.
51 Soto D., Llewelyn D., & Silvanto J. ( 2012). Distinct causal mechanisms of attentional guidance by working memory and repetition priming in early visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 32( 10), 3447-3452.
52 Soto D., Mok A. Y. F., McRobbie D., Quest R., Waldman A., & Rotshtein P. ( 2011). Biasing visual selection: functional neuroimaging of the interplay between spatial cueing and feature memory guidance. Neuropsychologia, 49( 6), 1537-1543.
53 Soto D., Rotshtein P., & Kanai R. ( 2014). Parietal structure and function explain human variation in working memory biases of visual attention. Neuroimage, 89, 289-296.
54 Tan J. F., Zhao Y. F., Wang, L. J, Tian, X., Cui Y., Yang Q., .. & Chen A. ( 2015). The competitive influences of perceptual load and working memory guidance on selective attention. PloS One, 10( 6), e0129533. 9
55 Theeuwes, J. ( 1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception, & Psychophysics, 50( 2), 184-193.
56 van Moorselaar D., Theeuwes J., & Olivers, C. N. L. ( 2014). In competition for the attentional template: Can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40( 4), 1450-1464.
57 Wang L. H., Yu H. G., Hu J., Theeuwes J., Gong X. L., Xiang Y., .. & Zhou, X. L. ( 2015). Reward breaks through center‐surround inhibition via anterior insula. Human Brain Mapping, 36( 12), 5233-5251.
58 Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. ( 1997). Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104( 1), 90-122.
59 Wolfe, J. M. ( 2007). Guided search 4.0. Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems, 99-119.
60 Woodman, G. F. ( 2010). A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials in studies of perception and attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72( 8), 2031-2046.
61 Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. ( 2007). Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33( 2), 363-377.
62 Yantis, S. ( 2000). Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional control. Attention and performance, 18, 73-103.
63 Yantis, S., & Egeth, H. E. ( 1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25( 3), 661-676.
64 Zhang B., Zhang J. X., Kong L. Y., Huang S., Yue Z. Z., & Wang S. ( 2010). Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes. Neuroscience Letters, 486( 3), 202-206.




[1]张帆, 陈艾睿, 董波, 王爱君, 张明. 视觉注意捕获的快速脱离假说与信号抑制假说[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 45-55.
[2]臧学莲, 张笑笑, 贾丽娜, 李根强, 李红. 选择性注意机制在情景线索效应中的作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(9): 1503-1511.
[3]蔡頠;吴嵩;寇彧. 权力对亲社会行为的影响:机制及相关因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(1): 120-131.
[4]范玲霞;齐森青;郭仁露;黄博;杨东. 奖励影响注意选择的认知加工机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(10): 1573-1584.
[5]魏萍;康冠兰. 奖赏性线索启动和调控视觉搜索额顶网络的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(6): 798-804.
[6]张明;王爱君. 视觉搜索中基于工作记忆内容的注意捕获与抑制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(12): 1899-1907.
[7]李毕琴;张明. 跨感觉通道任务中刺激驱动注意捕获的不对称性[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(11): 1749-1754.
[8]魏萍;周晓林. 任务维度和任务无关维度干扰信息的同质性影响视觉搜索的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(6): 794-802.
[9]徐李娟;黄莹;吴玺宏;吴艳红;李量. “鸡尾酒会”环境中的知觉线索的去掩蔽作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(02): 261-267.
[10]李会杰;陈楚侨. 注意捕获的另一扇窗户——无意视盲[J]. 心理科学进展, 2007, 15(04): 577-586.
[11]张明;张阳. 工作记忆与选择性注意的交互关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2007, 15(01): 8-15.
[12]雷学军;金志成. 预搜索过滤分心物的机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(02): 210-.
[13]魏萍,周晓林. 从知觉负载理论来理解选择性注意[J]. 心理科学进展, 2005, 13(04): 413-420.
[14]储衡清,周晓林. 注意捕获与自上而下的加工过程[J]. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12(05): 680-687.
[15]罗跃嘉;魏景汉. 跨感觉通道注意ERP研究现状与争论[J]. 心理科学进展, 1996, 4(4): 7-11.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4453
相关话题/心理 科学 工作 视觉 控制

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 舌尖上的“自虐”——食辣中的心理学问题
    傅于玲1,2,邓富民1,*(),杨帅3,徐玖平11四川大学商学院,成都6100412成都理工大学心理健康教育中心,成都6100593重庆邮电大学教育发展研究院,重庆400065收稿日期:2017-10-16出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:邓富民E-mail:de ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 数字效应对消费者行为的影响及其心理机制
    吴莹皓,蒋晶*()中国人民大学商学院,北京100872收稿日期:2017-08-02出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:蒋晶E-mail:jiangjing@rmbs.ruc.edu.cnThenumerosityeffectsinconsumerbehaviorW ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 自闭症谱系障碍者抑制控制的影响因素及神经机制
    孙岩1(),房林1,王亭予1,崔丽21辽宁师范大学心理学院,大连1160292大连小海豚自闭症儿童康复中心,大连116000收稿日期:2017-05-31出版日期:2018-08-15发布日期:2018-07-02通讯作者:孙岩E-mail:sun9199@163.com基金资助:教育部人文社会科学 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 工作重塑干预:对员工工作自主性的培养
    徐长江(),陈实浙江师范大学心理学系,金华321004收稿日期:2017-03-08出版日期:2018-08-15发布日期:2018-07-02通讯作者:徐长江E-mail:xucj@zjnu.cnTheinterventionsofjobcrafting:Acultivationofemploye ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 视觉表象个体差异及其神经基础
    叶晓燕1,张得龙1,常松2,刘鸣1()1南师范大学心理学院,广州5106312东大学教育科学学院,山东烟台264025收稿日期:2017-06-20出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29通讯作者:刘鸣E-mail:liuming@scnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 工作场所不文明行为受害者向实施者反转的机制
    严瑜(),李彤武汉大学哲学学院心理学系,武汉430072收稿日期:2017-06-20出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29通讯作者:严瑜E-mail:yanyu@whu.edu.cn基金资助:教育部一般人文社科研究规划基金项目(组织不文明行为溢出效应和交叉效应的心理机制)(1 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 冲突解决过程中认知控制的注意调节机制 *
    李政汉1,2,杨国春1,2,南威治3,李琦1,2,刘勋1,2()1中国科学院行为科学重点实验室,北京1001012中国科学院大学,北京1000493广州大学教育学院心理系脑与认知科学中心,广州510006收稿日期:2017-07-21出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 语言认知神经科学研究中的脑沟形态分析 *
    崔新1,苏萌萌2,舒华1()1北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,北京1008752首都师范大学初等教育学院,北京100048收稿日期:2017-02-22出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:舒华E-mail:shuhua@bnu.edu.cn基金资助:* ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 喜欢悲伤音乐的心理机制 *
    王丁,王超,李红()深圳大学心理与社会学院,深圳518060收稿日期:2017-05-23出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:李红E-mail:lihongszu@szu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(31671150);广东省普通高校创新团队建设项 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 基本心理需要及其满足 *
    吴才智(),荣硕,朱芳婷,谌燕,郭永玉青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,华中师范大学心理学院,人的发展与心理健康湖北省重点实验室,武汉430079收稿日期:2017-10-17出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:吴才智E-mail:dsxq888@126.com ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01