尚惠芳,
易小燕^,,
张宗芳
中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所 北京 100081
基金项目: 国家社科基金重大项目18ZDA048
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项1610132018010

详细信息

作者简介:尚惠芳, 研究领域为环境保护与资源利用。E-mail: qiqi7280@163.com

通讯作者:易小燕, 主要从事土地资源管理研究。E-mail: yixiaoyan@caas.cn

中图分类号:F301.21

计量

文章访问数:148
HTML全文浏览量:20
PDF下载量:23
被引次数:0

出版历程

收稿日期:2021-03-10
录用日期:2021-04-30
刊出日期:2021-07-01

Logic paths and driving forces of cultivated land quality improvement behavior of farmers: Research progress and prospects

SHANG Huifang,
YI Xiaoyan^,,
ZHANG Zongfang
Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Funds: the National Social Science Foundation of China18ZDA048
the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Non-profit Scientific Institution of China1610132018010

More Information

Corresponding author:YI Xiaoyan, E-mail: yixiaoyan@caas.cn

摘要
HTML全文
图(1)表(0)
参考文献(56)
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件(0)
访问统计

摘要
摘要:新时代我国耕地保护已转型为数量、质量、生态"三位一体"格局，提升耕地质量是确保国家粮食安全和重要农产品有效供给的资源基础，是实现农业高质量发展的条件保障。农户是耕地的直接利用者与经营者，也是耕地质量保护与提升的直接主体，促进农户的耕地质量提升行为是实现耕地保护战略目标的关键。本文通过文献统计与归纳总结，对国内外相关研究进行梳理和分析发现：农户耕地质量提升行为的逻辑一般沿"认知→意愿→行为"路径，也存在"认知→行为"的可能；农户采取耕地质量提升行为的响应程度不高，通过调节关键驱动因素可提高农户的积极性。从行为逻辑与响应过程来看，农户耕地质量提升行为的关键驱动力为认知水平、经营规模、土地经营权稳定性和政策支持。此外，现有文献的研究方法主要为定性与简单定量研究，缺乏对农户耕地质量提升行为的障碍因素、契约关系稳定性、不同经营主体行为差异性等方面的定量研究。因此，从多元主体等视角，采用定量模型等方法，开展农户耕地质量提升行为的关键因素识别、障碍因素分析和政策支持探索成为未来研究的重点方向。
关键词:农户行为/
耕地质量提升/
逻辑路径/
驱动力分析
Abstract:The "three-in-one" approach of quantity, quality, and ecology has become the target of cultivated land protection in China; improving the quality of cultivated land is the resource basis for ensuring food security and effective supply of important agricultural products in China. It also helps to achieve high-quality agricultural development. To better understand the cultivated land quality improvement behavior of farmers, who represent a key demographic for achieving the strategic objectives of cultivated land protection, this study analyzed the logical paths and driving forces of cultivated land improvement behavior of farmers. We found that the logic of farmland quality improvement behavior of farmers generally followed the path of "cognition→will→behavior", but there was also the possibility of "cognition→behavior". This can be subdivided into four different logical paths based on the theory of planned behavior, the theory of stimulus and response, the theory of extended value-belief-norm, and the theory of rational individuals. The behavior response to cultivated land quality improvement was not optimistic, and the enthusiasm of farmers could be improved by adjusting the key driving factors. From the perspective of progress in behavior logic and response, the key driving forces of farmland quality improvement behavior of farmers were the business scale, stability of land management rights, awareness level, and policy support. There were linear and non-linear relationships between the scale of cultivated land and the cultivated land quality improvement behavior of farmer households, and the proportion of large-scale entities who implemented cultivated land quality improvement trended upward. The evaluation of farmland quality status of farmers hindered their farmland quality improvement behavior, whereas the awareness of farmers regarding environmental protection played a promoting role. The cognitive level of farmers was affected by the level of information acquisition. The stability of land management rights had a "guarantee effect" for improving the quality of cultivated land. Policy constraints primarily regulated farmland quality improvement behaviors of farmers by providing policy guidance or constraints, whereas preferential subsidies promoted quality improvement behavior by giving farmers preferential treatment or compensation. The existing literatures lacked quantitative researches on the obstacles to farmland quality improvement behavior, the stability of contract relationships, and the behavioral differences of different business entities. Therefore, future studies should use quantitative models and other methods to identify the key factors, analyze the obstacles, and examine policy support programs for farmland quality improvement behaviors of farmers.
Key words:Farmers' behavior/
Cultivated land quality improvement/
Logic paths/
Driving forces analysis

HTML全文


图1农户耕地质量提升行为逻辑图
Figure1.Logical paths of farmers' cultivated land quality improvement behavior


下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片


参考文献(56)

[1]	STOCKING M A. Tropical soils and food security: The next 50 years[J]. Science, 2003, 302(5649): 1356-1359 doi: 10.1126/science.1088579
[2]	中华人民共和国农业农村部. 全国耕地质量等级情况公报[EB/OL]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/nybgb/2020/202004/202005/t20200506_6343095.htm,2019 Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China. Communique on the quality and grade of cultivated land in China[EB/OL]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/nybgb/2020/202004/202005/t20200506_6343095.htm,2019
[3]	中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 全国土壤污染状况调查公报[EB/OL]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/sthjbgw/qt/201404/W020140417558995804588.pdf,2014 The Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China. National survey bulletin on soil pollution status[EB/OL]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/sthjbgw/qt/201404/W020140417558995804588.pdf,2014
[4]	杨志海, 王雨濛. 不同代际农民耕地质量保护行为研究——基于鄂豫两省829户农户的调研[J]. 农业技术经济, 2015, (10): 48-56 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJS201510006.htm YANG Z H, WANG Y M. Research on farmland quality protection behaviors of farmers from different generations-Based on a survey of 829 farmers in Hubei and Henan Provinces[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2015, (10): 48-56 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJS201510006.htm
[5]	赵丹丹, 周宏. 农村土地流转对农户耕地质量保护选择行为的影响研究[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2017, (11): 54-57 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JGLS201711014.htm ZHAO D D, ZHOU H. Study on the influence of rural land transfer on the behavior of farmers' cultivated land quality protection selection[J]. Price: Theory & Practice, 2017, (11): 54-57 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JGLS201711014.htm
[6]	刘洪彬, 王秋兵, 吴岩, 等. 耕地质量保护中农户的认知程度、行为决策响应及其影响机制研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2018, 32(8): 52-58 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZTKX201808008.htm LIU H B, WANG Q B, WU Y, et al. Research on cognition degree, behavioral decision response of rural households and impact mechanism in cultivated land quality protection[J]. China Land Science, 2018, 32(8): 52-58 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZTKX201808008.htm
[7]	高富雄, 赵丹丹, 陶应虎. 异质性农户视角下经营规模与耕地质量保护意愿及行为响应研究[J]. 江苏科技信息, 2020, 37(3): 70-74 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7530.2020.03.020 GAO F X, ZHAO D D, TAO Y H. Research on the willingness and behavior response of management scale and cultivated land quality protection from the perspective of heterogeneous farmers[J]. Jiangsu Science & Technology Information, 2020, 37(3): 70-74 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7530.2020.03.020
[8]	吴璟, 王征兵, 娄季春. 家庭内部分工视角下的农户耕地质量保护意愿[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报: 社会科学版, 2020, 20(4): 131-140 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NLXS202004015.htm WU J, WANG Z B, LOU J C. Study on farmers' willingness of cultivated land quality protection from the perspective of labor division within family[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University: Social Science Edition, 2020, 20(4): 131-140 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NLXS202004015.htm
[9]	杨志海, 王雅鹏, 麦尔旦·吐尔孙. 农户耕地质量保护性投入行为及其影响因素分析——基于兼业分化视角[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(12): 105-112 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2015.12.013 YANG Z H, WANG Y P, MAIERDAN·TUERSUN. Farm households' input behavior of land conservation and its driving factors: from a perspective of farm household differentiation[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2015, 25(12): 105-112 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2015.12.013
[10]	DESPOTOVI? J, RODI? V, CARACCIOLO F. Factors affecting farmers' adoption of integrated pest management in Serbia: an application of the theory of planned behavior[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 228: 1196-1205 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.149
[11]	LI F D, REN J, WIMMER S, et al. Incentive mechanism for promoting farmers to plant green manure in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 267: 122197 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122197
[12]	曹慧, 赵凯. 代际差异视角下粮农保护性耕作投入意愿的影响因素分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报: 社会科学版, 2018, 18(1): 115-123 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NLXS201801015.htm CAO H, ZHAO K. Influencing factors of grain farmers' willingness of arable land conservation input: based on perspective of intergenerational differences[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University: Social Science Edition, 2018, 18(1): 115-123 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NLXS201801015.htm
[13]	李明月, 陈凯. 农户绿色农业生产意愿与行为的实证分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2020, (4): 10-19, 173-174 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZND202004002.htm LI M Y, CHEN K. An empirical analysis of farmers' willingness and behaviors in green agriculture production[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2020, (4): 10-19, 173-174 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZND202004002.htm
[14]	郑沃林, 吴剑辉, 郑荣宝. 经济快速发展地区农户耕地保护的意愿与实施行为差异研究——以广州市为例[J]. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, 2019, 48(2): 64-73 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNSS201902009.htm ZHENG W L, WU J H, ZHENG R B. A study on the contradiction between the cultivated land protection willingness and the implementation behavior: Taking Guangzhou as an example[J]. Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University, 2019, 48(2): 64-73 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNSS201902009.htm
[15]	石志恒, 崔民, 张衡. 基于扩展计划行为理论的农户绿色生产意愿研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(3): 40-48 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH202003007.htm SHI Z H, CUI M, ZHANG H. Study on farmers' green production willingness based on expanded planning behavior theory[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020, 34(3): 40-48 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH202003007.htm
[16]	谢贤鑫, 陈美球. 农户生态耕种采纳意愿及其异质性分析——基于TPB框架的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(5): 1185-1196 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJLY201905018.htm XIE X X, CHEN M Q. Farmers' willingness to adopt ecological farming and their heterogeneity: Based on the TPB framework[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(5): 1185-1196 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJLY201905018.htm
[17]	AJZEN I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211 doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
[18]	LI J, FENG S Y, LUO T Y, et al. What drives the adoption of sustainable production technology? Evidence from the large scale farming sector in East China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 257: 120611 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120611
[19]	李卫, 薛彩霞, 姚顺波, 等. 农户保护性耕作技术采用行为及其影响因素: 基于黄土高原476户农户的分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2017, (1): 44-57 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201701004.htm LI W, XUE C X, YAO S B, et al. The adoption behavior of households' conservation tillage technology: An empirical analysis based on data collected from 476 households on the loess plateau[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2017, (1): 44-57 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201701004.htm
[20]	石志恒, 张衡. 基于扩展价值-信念-规范理论的农户绿色生产行为研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(8): 96-102 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH202008013.htm SHI Z H, ZHANG H. Farmers' green production behavior examined through the value-belief-norm theory[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020, 34(8): 96-102 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH202008013.htm
[21]	SCHWARTZ S H. Normative influences on altruism[J]. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1977, 10: 221-279
[22]	陈美球, 冯黎妮, 周丙娟, 等. 农户耕地保护性投入意愿的实证分析[J]. 中国农村观察, 2008, (5): 23-29 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNCG200805004.htm CHEN M Q, FENG L N, ZHOU B J, et al. An empirical analysis of farmers' cultivated land protective investment willingness[J]. China Rural Survey, 2008, (5): 23-29 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNCG200805004.htm
[23]	钱龙, 冯永辉, 陆华良, 等. 产权安全性感知对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响——以广西为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(10): 93-101 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZTKX201910011.htm QIAN L, FENG Y H, LU H L, et al. The influence of property right security perception on farmers' farmland quality protection behaviors: Taking Guangxi as an example[J]. China Land Science, 2019, 33(10): 93-101 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZTKX201910011.htm
[24]	ZEWELD W, VAN HUYLENBROECK G, TESFAY G, et al. Smallholder farmers' behavioural intentions towards sustainable agricultural practices[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 187: 71-81 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.014
[25]	TERANO R, MOHAMED Z, SHAMSUDIN M N, et al. Factors influencing intention to adopt sustainable agriculture practices among paddy farmers in Kada, Malaysia[J]. Asian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2015, 9(5): 268-275 doi: 10.3923/ajar.2015.268.275
[26]	FINUCANE M L, ALHAKAMI A, SLOVIC P, et al. The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits[J]. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2000, 13(1): 1-17 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S
[27]	王淇韬, 郭翔宇. 感知利益、社会网络与农户耕地质量保护行为——基于河南省滑县410个粮食种植户调查数据[J]. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(7): 43-51 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZTKX202007006.htm WANG Q T, GUO X Y. Perceived benefits, social network and farmers' behavior of cultivated land quality protection: Based on 410 grain growers' surveys in Hua County, Henan Province[J]. China Land Science, 2020, 34(7): 43-51 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZTKX202007006.htm
[28]	高昕. 乡村振兴战略背景下农户绿色生产行为内在影响因素的实证研究[J]. 经济经纬, 2019, 36(3): 41-48 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJJW201903007.htm GAO X. Empirical study on internal influencing factors of farmer households' green production behavior in rural revitalization strategy[J]. Economic Survey, 2019, 36(3): 41-48 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJJW201903007.htm
[29]	DE RIDIER A, CHAIB K, ROUSSY C. A Dynamic Stochastic Programming model of crop rotation choice to test the adoption of long rotation under price and production risks[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 252(1): 270-279 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.025
[30]	余威震, 罗小锋, 李容容, 等. 绿色认知视角下农户绿色技术采纳意愿与行为悖离研究[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(8): 1573-1583 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZY201708013.htm YU W Z, LUO X F, LI R R, et al. The paradox between farmer willingness and their adoption of green technology from the perspective of green cognition[J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(8): 1573-1583 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZY201708013.htm
[31]	谢文宝, 陈彤, 刘国勇. 乡村振兴背景下农户耕地质量保护技术采纳差异分析[J]. 改革, 2018, (11): 117-129 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-REFO201811012.htm XIE W B, CHEN T, LIU G Y. Analysis on technology adoption difference of farmers' farmland quality protection under the background of rural revitalization[J]. Reform, 2018, (11): 117-129 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-REFO201811012.htm
[32]	ZHANG H, ZHANG Y M, WU S, et al. The effect of labor migration on farmers' cultivated land quality protection[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(7): 2953 doi: 10.3390/su12072953
[33]	YANG X M, CHENG L L, HUANG X L, et al. Incentive mechanism to promote corn stalk return sustainably in Henan, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 738: 139775 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139775
[34]	GAO Y, ZHANG X, LU J, et al. Adoption behavior of green control techniques by family farms in China: Evidence from 676 family farms in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain[J]. Crop Protection, 2017, 99: 76-84 doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2017.05.012
[35]	JIANG W J, YAN T W, CHEN B. Impact of media channels and social interactions on the adoption of straw return by Chinese farmers[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 756: 144078 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144078
[36]	张童朝, 颜廷武, 张俊飚. 德政何以善治: 村域干群关系如何影响农民参与农业废弃物资源化?——来自四省1372份农户数据的验证[J]. 南京农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2020, 20(1): 150-160 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJNS202001017.htm ZHANG T C, YAN T W, ZHANG J B. How the rural cadre-farmer relationship affects the farmers' agricultural waste utilization: Based on the survey data of 1372 farmers in four provinces[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2020, 20(1): 150-160 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJNS202001017.htm
[37]	L?PPLE D, KELLEY H. Spatial dependence in the adoption of organic drystock farming in Ireland[J]. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2015, 42(2): 315-337 doi: 10.1093/erae/jbu024
[38]	刘帅, 余晓洋, 吴迪. 粮食主产区农户耕地质量保护情况调查研究——基于吉林省446户样本的分析[J]. 经济纵横, 2019, (2): 79-87 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJZH201902009.htm LIU S, YU X Y, WU D. Investigation and study on the quality protection of farmers' farmland in the main grain producing areas-based on the analysis of 446 samples from Jilin Province[J]. Economic Review Journal, 2019, (2): 79-87 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJZH201902009.htm
[39]	张连华, 霍学喜. 农地规模与农户农地质量保护行为研究——基于771个苹果种植户的分析[J]. 农业经济与管理, 2019, (6): 48-61 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJG201906006.htm ZHANG L H, HUO X X. Land scale and farmland quality conservation behavior of farmers-an analysis based on 771 apple growers[J]. Agricultural Economics and Management, 2019, (6): 48-61 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJG201906006.htm
[40]	WU Y Y, XI X C, TANG X, et al. Policy distortions, farm size, and the overuse of agricultural chemicals in China[J]. PNAS, 2018, 115(27): 7010-7015 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806645115
[41]	叶孙红, 齐振宏, 黄炜虹, 等. 经营规模、信息技术获取与农户生态生产行为——对不同生产行为及农户类型的差异性分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2019, 24(3): 173-186 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYDX201903021.htm YE S H, QI Z H, HUANG W H, et al. Operation scale, information acquisition and farmers' ecological production behavior: Analysis on the difference of different production behaviors and farmers' types[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2019, 24(3): 173-186 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYDX201903021.htm
[42]	GAO Y, LIU B, YU L L, et al. Social capital, land tenure and the adoption of green control techniques by family farms: Evidence from Shandong and Henan Provinces of China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019, 89: 104250 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104250
[43]	张伟华, 周迪, 李玉峰. 农民合作社绿色生产行为影响因素研究——基于扎根理论的探讨[J]. 世界农业, 2020, (9): 20-28 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJNY202009004.htm ZHANG W H, ZHOU D, LI Y F. Study on the factors affecting the green production behavior of farmer cooperatives-Discussion based on grounded theory[J]. World Agriculture, 2020, (9): 20-28 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJNY202009004.htm
[44]	张瑞娟, 高鸣. 新技术采纳行为与技术效率差异——基于小农户与种粮大户的比较[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018, (5): 84-97 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201805006.htm ZHANG R J, GAO M. New technology adoption behaviors and differences in technology efficiency: A comparative analysis of small and large grain producers[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018, (5): 84-97 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201805006.htm
[45]	蔡颖萍, 杜志雄. 家庭农场生产行为的生态自觉性及其影响因素分析——基于全国家庭农场监测数据的实证检验[J]. 中国农村经济, 2016, (12): 33-45 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201612003.htm CAI Y P, DU Z X. Analysis of ecological consciousness of family farm production behavior and its influencing factors[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2016, (12): 33-45 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201612003.htm
[46]	GAO L, ZHANG W D, MEI Y D, et al. Do farmers adopt fewer conservation practices on rented land? Evidence from straw retention in China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 79: 609-621 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.026
[47]	KABUBU M J, LINDERHOF V, KRUSEMAN G. Does land tenure security matter for investment in soil and water conservation? Evidence from Kenya[J]. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2010, 4(2): 123-139 http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/20113073000.html
[48]	VAN GELDER J L. What tenure security? The case for a tripartite view[J]. Land Use Policy, 2010, 27(2): 449-456 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.06.008
[49]	郑沃林. 土地产权稳定能促进农户绿色生产行为吗?——以广东省确权颁证与农户采纳测土配方施肥技术为例证[J]. 西部论坛, 2020, 30(3): 51-61 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CQSY202003008.htm ZHENG W L. Can land property rights stability boost farmers' green production behavior?: take guangdong's land titling and formula fertilization by soil testing technology as an example[J]. West Forum, 2020, 30(3): 51-61 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CQSY202003008.htm
[50]	诸培新, 苏敏, 颜杰. 转入农地经营规模及稳定性对农户化肥投入的影响——以江苏四县(市)水稻生产为例[J]. 南京农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2017, 17(4): 85-94 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJNS201704011.htm ZHU P X, SU M, YAN J. Impact of farmland scale and stability on fertilizer input: Taking rice production of four counties of Jiangsu Province as example[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2017, 17(4): 85-94 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJNS201704011.htm
[51]	LU H, ZHANG P W, HU H, et al. Effect of the grain-growing purpose and farm size on the ability of stable land property rights to encourage farmers to apply organic fertilizers[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 251: 109621
[52]	赵建英. 耕地生态保护激励政策对农户行为的影响研究——基于农户施肥施药行为的分析[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2019 ZHAO J Y. Study on the influence of incentive policies of cultivated land ecological protection on farmers' behavior-Based on the analysis of farmers' behavior of fertilization and application[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2019
[53]	徐涛, 赵敏娟, 乔丹, 等. 农户偏好与"两型技术"补贴政策设计[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报: 社会科学版, 2018, 18(4): 109-118 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NLXS201804016.htm XU T, ZHAO M J, QIAO D, et al. Subsidy policy design of two oriented technology based on farmer households' preference[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University: Social Science Edition, 2018, 18(4): 109-118 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NLXS201804016.htm
[54]	EZZINE-DE-BLAS D, WUNDER S, RUIZ-PéREZ M, et al. Global patterns in the implementation of payments for environmental services[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(3): e0149847 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149847
[55]	李福夺, 任静, 尹昌斌. 资本禀赋、价值认知与农户绿肥养地采纳行为——基于南方稻区农户调查数据及生态补偿政策的调节效应[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2020, 19(4): 464-475 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JNDS202004008.htm LI F D, REN J, YIN C B. Capital endowment, value cognition and farmers' adoption behavior of planting green manure: Based on the survey data of farmers in Southern China and the moderating effect of ecological compensation policies[J]. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2020, 19(4): 464-475 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JNDS202004008.htm
[56]	CAO H, ZHU X Q, HEIJMAN W, et al. The impact of land transfer and farmers' knowledge of farmland protection policy on pro-environmental agricultural practices: The case of straw return to fields in Ningxia, China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 277: 123701