马延吉1, 2,,
1.中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所 长春 130102
2.中国科学院大学资源与环境学院 北京 100049
基金项目: 中国科学院战略性先导科技专项（A类）XDA19040500
详细信息
作者简介:刘钰, 主要研究方向为经济地理与可持续发展。E-mail:liuyu@iga.ac.cn
通讯作者:马延吉, 主要研究方向为经济地理与可持续发展。E-mail:mayanji@iga.ac.cn
中图分类号:F129.9计量
文章访问数:741
HTML全文浏览量:8
PDF下载量:601
被引次数:0
出版历程
收稿日期:2018-11-14
录用日期:2019-04-02
刊出日期:2019-07-01
Progress and outlook of agricultural ecological footprints
LIU Yu1, 2,,MA Yanji1, 2,,
1. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China
2. College of Re-sources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Funds: the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of SciencesXDA19040500
More Information
Corresponding author:MA Yanji, mayanji@iga.ac.cn
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要
摘要:农业生态足迹作为一种有效衡量农业可持续发展状况的计量工具，具有模型可操作性和结果可比性强的优势。本文从农业生态足迹的概念内涵出发，对农业生态足迹的算法、参数调整及农业生态足迹的应用等方面的国内外相关研究进行了文献综述。算法上，介绍了农业生态足迹的4种计算思路，包括只考虑农业生物资源消耗、同时考虑农业生物资源消耗和能源消耗、考虑农业废弃物及污染物以及结合其他计量方法，并分别阐述了其具体算法，且总结了农业生态足迹参数调整的一般方法；应用上，梳理了不同农业技术及生产方式的合理性分析及农业系统的可持续性分析。综述发现，算法方面，已有研究从农业生态足迹的传统模型出发，依据不同研究目的设计计算思路，近几年，与其他计量方法的结合应用越来越受到关注；参数方面，从直接采用"全球公顷"方法中的均衡因子和产量因子，到依据研究区域修改两个因子参数，再到结合能值理论、净初级生产力等其他计量方法中相对稳定的参数，使得计算结果更加精确；应用方面，逐渐以农业生态为研究主线，结合农业社会、经济、科技等维度综合探究农业可持续发展问题。
关键词:农业生态足迹/
算法/
参数调整/
农业可持续发展
Abstract:As an effective metrology tool to assess the sustainable development of agriculture, the agricultural ecological footprint has been widely adopted by scholars worldwide due to the model's high operability and result comparability. In the process of its development, the combination of the agricultural ecological footprint with other measurement methods, such as the energy theory, life cycle theory, input-output method, scenario simulation, etc., has provided an effective approach for sustainable agricultural development. In recent years, the contribution of agriculture to the GDP in China has been declining. Sustainable agricultural development and management are very important aspects for China to solve the "Three Rural Issues", which have already become extremely worthy of attention and research. Agriculture has its peculiarities. On the one hand, agricultural activities consume raw materials and energy resources. On the other hand, agriculture also yields products in addition to agricultural wastes and pollutants. Therefore, the agricultural ecological footprints are different from the ecological footprints of other industries. Based on the concept of agricultural ecological footprints, this article reviewed the domestic and international researches on the algorithm for agricultural ecological footprints, parameter adjustments, and application of agricultural ecological footprints for assessing sustainable agricultural development. In terms of the algorithm, this paper summed up four perspectives:1) only considering the agricultural consumption of biological resources, 2) simultaneously considering the agricultural consumption of both biological resources and energy, 3) considering agricultural waste and pollutants, and 4) combining other measurement methods. We also summarized the general methods for adjusting the parameters of agricultural ecological footprints. The paper also discussed the general methods for adjusting the parameters of agricultural ecological footprints, including the general methods for the adjustment of the yield (YF) and equivalence factors (EQF). In addition, this paper reviewed the impact of different agricultural technologies and modes of agricultural production on agricultural ecological footprints, as well as the application of agricultural ecological footprints for the sustainable development of agriculture. This research showed that scholars worldwide had made a series of empirical explorations in the fields related to agricultural ecological footprints, thus making significant progress. In terms of the algorithm, researchers had begun to improve the original algorithm from the traditional model of agricultural ecological footprints. In terms of parameter adjustments, scholars had constantly adjusted the YF and EQF to make the results closer to the reality of local agricultural development. In terms of the application, scholars had taken agroecology as the main line and combined social, economic, and technological dimensions to comprehensively study agricultural sustainable development.
Key words:Agricultural ecological footprint/
Algorithm/
Parameter adjustment/
Agricultural sustainable development
HTML全文
表1农业生态足迹产量因子参数调整的一般方法
Table1.General methods of parameter adjustment of yield factor (YF) of agricultural ecological footprint
| 产量因子调整的一般方法 Method of YF adjustment | 文献 Reference | 年份 Year |
| 以“全球公顷”为计算标准, 采用全球平均产量计算产量因子 The global average yield is used to calculate the YF with “Global Hectare” as the calculation standard. | [51] | 1996 |
| 以“国家公顷”为计算标准, 采用全国平均产量计算产量因子 The national average yield is used to calculate the YF with “National Hectare” as the calculation standard. | [50] | 2007 |
| 采用特征参量调整法计算所得 Calculated by the method of adjustment of characteristic parameters. | [52] | 2007 |
| 采用世界上各个国家最常用5组因子的平均值 Take the average of the 5 most commonly used factors in each country in the world | [53] | 2007 |
| 以“使用量”或“消费量”来替代 Replaced with “usage” or “consumption” | [36] | 2008 |
| 采用研究区域(福建省)多年平均单位产量计算 Calculated with the multi-year average unit yield of the study area (Fujian Province) | [19] | 2010 |
| 考虑农业耕作方式对产量因子的影响, 构建边际函数计算边际农业产量 Calculate the marginal agricultural yield by marginal functions taking into account effects of farming methods on YF | [54] | 2012 |
| 耕地的产量因子采用不同耕地类型产量因子加权计算所得 Calculated by weighting the YF of different cultivated land types | [55] | 2013 |
| 未计算产量因子, 根据2010年中国平均生产效率, 核算了主要农产品的生态足迹系数 Instead of YF, the ecological footprint coefficient was calculated for major agricultural products based on average production efficiency | [56] | 2014 |
下载: 导出CSV表2农业生态足迹均衡因子参数调整的一般方法
Table2.General methods of parameters adjustment of equivalence factor (EQF) of agricultural ecological footprint
| 均衡因子调整的一般方法 General method of EQF adjustment | 文献 Reference | 年份 Year |
| 化石能源地和水资源地均以1.0计算, 其余各类土地采用 Wackernagel的研究成果EQF of fossil energy and water resources was 1.0, and that of other land types referred the study results of Wackernagel. | [57] | 1999 |
| 采用Wackernagel等2004年修改的均衡因子 Modified EQF by Wackernagel et al. in 2004 | [58] | 2004 |
| 《Living Planet Report 2006》中考虑土地类型的世界平均生产力差异后所得 From Living Planet Report 2006 taking into account the world average productivity differences in land types | [59] | 2006 |
| 未对各种土地类型进行均衡加总计算, 只做分类计算比较 Classified calculation comparison without balanced summation calculation for various land types. | [60] | 2007 |
| 采用世界上各个国家最常用的5组系数的平均值 Take the average of the 5 most commonly used coefficients in each country in the world | [53] | 2007 |
| 基于净初级生产力计算得出耕地的均衡因子为 1.74 According to the calculation of NPP, the EQF of cultivated land is 1.74 | [61] | 2009 |
下载: 导出CSV参考文献
| [1] | 景跃军, 张宇鹏.生态足迹模型回顾与研究进展[J].人口学刊, 2008, (5):9-12 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=rkxk200805002 JING Y J, ZHANG Y P. The review of ecological footprint model and its research progress[J]. Population Journal, 2008, (5):9-12 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=rkxk200805002 |
| [2] | 方恺.足迹家族:概念、类型、理论框架与整合模式[J].生态学报, 2015, 35(6):1647-1659 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201506001 FANG K. Footprint family:Concept, classification, theoretical framework and integrated pattern[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(6):1647-1659 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201506001 |
| [3] | 徐中民, 张志强, 程国栋.甘肃省1998年生态足迹计算与分析[J].地理学报, 2000, 55(5):607-616 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLXB200005012.htm XU Z M, ZHANG Z Q, CHENG G D. The calculation and analysis of ecological footprints of Gansu Province[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000, 55(5):607-616 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLXB200005012.htm |
| [4] | 黄宝荣, 崔书红, 李颖明.中国2000-2010年生态足迹变化特征及影响因素[J].环境科学, 2016, 37(2):420-426 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hjkx201602005 HUANG B R, CUI S H, LI Y M. Ecological footprint evolution characteristics and its influencing factors in China from 2000 to 2010[J]. Environmental Science, 2016, 37(2):420-426 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hjkx201602005 |
| [5] | 曹淑艳, 谢高地.表达生态承载力的生态足迹模型演变[J].应用生态学报, 2007, 18(6):1365-1372 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2007.06.033 CAO S Y, XIE G D. Evolvement of ecological footprint model representing ecological carrying capacity[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(6):1365-1372 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2007.06.033 |
| [6] | 周涛, 王云鹏, 龚健周, 等.生态足迹的模型修正与方法改进[J].生态学报, 2015, 35(14):4592-4603 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201514004 ZHOU T, WANG Y P, GONG J Z, et al. Ecological footprint model modification and method improvement[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(14):4592-4603 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201514004 |
| [7] | WANG Z H, YANG L, YIN J H, et al. Assessment and prediction of environmental sustainability in China based on a modified ecological footprint model[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2018, 132:301-313 doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.05.003 |
| [8] | 杨青, 逯承鹏, 周峰, 等.基于能值-生态足迹模型的东北老工业基地生态安全评价——以辽宁省为例[J].应用生态学报, 2016, 27(5):1594-1602 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yystxb201605030 YANG Q, LU C P, ZHOU F, et al. An emergy-ecological footprint model based evaluation of ecological security at the old industrial area in Northeast China:A case study of Liaoning Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(5):1594-1602 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yystxb201605030 |
| [9] | 史丹, 王俊杰.基于生态足迹的中国生态压力与生态效率测度与评价[J].中国工业经济, 2016, (5):5-21 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zggyjj201605001 SHI D, WANG J J. Measurement and evaluation of China's ecological pressure and ecological efficiency based on ecological footprint[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2016, (5):5-21 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zggyjj201605001 |
| [10] | LIN W P, LI Y, LI X D, et al. The dynamic analysis and evaluation on tourist ecological footprint of city:Take Shanghai as an instance[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2018, 37:541-549 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.003 |
| [11] | MARZOUKI M, FROGER G, BALLET J. Ecotourism versus mass tourism. A comparison of environmental impacts based on ecological footprint analysis[J]. Sustainability, 2012, 4(1):123-140 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=sustainability-04-00123 |
| [12] | 夏楚瑜, 李艳, 叶艳妹, 等.基于净生产力生态足迹模型的工业碳排放效应、影响因素与情景模拟[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(11):3862-3871 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201711028 XIA C Y, LI Y, YE Y M, et al. Analysis of the industrial carbon emission effect based on the Net Primary Productivity Model, its influencing factors and scene simulation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(11):3862-3871 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201711028 |
| [13] | 王中航, 周传斌, 王如松, 等.中国典型特大城市交通的生态足迹评价[J].生态学杂志, 2015, 34(4):1129-1135 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxzz201504034 WANG Z H, ZHOU C B, WANG R S, et al. Assessment on traffic ecological footprint of typical megalopolises in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(4):1129-1135 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxzz201504034 |
| [14] | MOGHADDAM S M, NAZARI M R, SOUFIZADEH S. Integrating ecological impact indicators into economic restructuring decisions[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 89:327-335 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.045 |
| [15] | VIGLIZZO E F, FRANK F C, CARRENO L V, et al. Ecological and environmental footprint of 50 years of agricultural expansion in Argentina[J]. Global Change Biology, 2011, 17(2):959-973 doi: 10.1111/gcb.2010.17.issue-2 |
| [16] | VAN DER WERF H M G, TZILIVAKIS J, LEWIS K, et al. Environmental impacts of farm scenarios according to five assessment methods[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2007, 118(1/4):327-338 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=a88230cefd9f8867da1caa6c0edc3e14 |
| [17] | 焦雯珺, 闵庆文, 成升魁, 等.基于生态足迹的传统农业地区可持续发展评价——以贵州省从江县为例[J].中国农业生态学报, 2009, 17(2):354-358 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stnyyj200902029 JIAO W J, MIN Q W, CHENG S K, et al. Sustainable development analysis from ecological footprints of traditional agricultural area-A case study of Congjiang County of Guizhou Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2009, 17(2):354-358 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stnyyj200902029 |
| [18] | 焦雯珺, 闵庆文, 成升魁, 等.基于生态足迹的传统农业地区生态承载力分析——以浙江省青田县为例[J].资源科学, 2009, 31(1):63-68 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2009.01.008 JIAO W J, MIN Q W, CHENG S K, et al. Ecological capacity of a traditional agricultural area based on ecological footprint:A case study of Qingtian County, Zhejiang Province[J]. Resources Science, 2009, 31(1):63-68 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2009.01.008 |
| [19] | 毕安平, 朱鹤健, 王德光.基于区域产量法测算的福建省农业生态足迹[J].自然资源学报, 2010, 25(6):967-977 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zrzyxb201006009 BI A P, ZHU H J, WANG D G. Agricultural ecological footprint in Fujian Province base on regional yield method[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(6):967-977 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zrzyxb201006009 |
| [20] | 边淑娟, 黄民生, 李娟, 等.基于能值生态足迹理论的福建省农业废弃物再利用方式评估[J].生态学报, 2010, 30(10):2678-2686 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201010019 BIAN S J, HUANG M S, LI J, et al. An evaluation on the using ways of agricultural wastes reutilization in Fujian based on emergy and ecological footprint theory[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(10):2678-2686 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201010019 |
| [21] | FERNG J J. Measuring and locating footprints:A case study of Taiwan's rice and wheat consumption footprint[J]. Ecological Economics, 2011, 71:191-201 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.001 |
| [22] | 宋知远, 朱利群.基于作物生态足迹的江苏省市域种植业可持续发展研究[J].安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(16):227-230 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2016.16.074 SONG Z Y, ZHU L Q. Study on sustainable development of planting industry in cities of Jiangsu Province based on crops ecological footprint[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(16):227-230 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2016.16.074 |
| [23] | 舒畅, 乔娟.我国养殖业生态足迹时空特征及脱钩效应研究——以生猪产业为例[J].生态经济, 2016, 32(1):148-151 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4407.2016.01.032 SHU C, QIAO J. Research on spatial-temporal characteristics and decoupling effect of the breeding ecological footprint in China:Taking pig breeding as an example[J]. Ecological Economy, 2016, 32(1):148-151 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4407.2016.01.032 |
| [24] | SCHIAVON S, STURARO E, TAGLIAPIETRA F, et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus excretion on mountain farms of different dairy systems[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2019, 168:36-47 doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.10.006 |
| [25] | NIE Y, JI C Y, YANG H Q. The forest ecological footprint distribution of Chinese log imports[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2010, 12(3):231-235 doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.11.003 |
| [26] | 李剑泉, 巨茜, 陈绍志, 等.林业生态足迹研究进展及展望[J].林业经济, 2016, 38(6):70-77 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7789.2016.06.018 LI J Q, JU Q, CHEN S Z, et al. Progress and outlook for ecological footprint research on forestry[J]. Forestry Economics, 2016, 38(6):70-77 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7789.2016.06.018 |
| [27] | 吴隆杰.基于渔业生态足迹指数的渔业资源可持续利用测度研究[D].青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2006 WU L J. A study of measurement on sustainable utilization of fisheries resource based on ecological footprint index in fisheries[D]. Qingdao: Ocean University of China, 2006 |
| [28] | PARKER R W R, TYEDMERS P H. Uncertainty and natural variability in the ecological footprint of fisheries:A case study of reduction fisheries for meal and oil[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 16:76-83 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.015 |
| [29] | LI J G, YANG W H, WANG Y, et al. Carbon footprint and driving forces of saline agriculture in coastally reclaimed areas of eastern China:A survey of four staple crops[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(4):928 doi: 10.3390/su10040928 |
| [30] | 许萍萍, 赵言文, 陈颢明, 等.江苏省农田生态系统碳源/汇、碳足迹动态变化[J].水土保持通报, 2018, 38(5):238-243 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stbctb201805038 XU P P, ZHAO Y W, CHEN H M, et al. Dynamic change of carbon source/sink and carbon footprint of farmland ecosystem in Jiangsu Province[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 38(5):238-243 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stbctb201805038 |
| [31] | WANG Y B, WU P T, ENGEL B A, et al. Application of water footprint combined with a unified virtual crop pattern to evaluate crop water productivity in grain production in China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 497/498:1-9 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.089 |
| [32] | 宋智渊, 冯起, 张福平, 等.敦煌1980-2012年农业水足迹及结构变化特征[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2015, 29(6):133-138 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ghqzyyhj201506023 SONG Z Y, FENG Q, ZHANG F P, et al. Agriculture water footprint and structural characteristics in Dunhuang from 1980 to 2012[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2015, 29(6):133-138 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ghqzyyhj201506023 |
| [33] | TIAN M R, GAO J X, ZHENG Z R, et al. The study on the ecological footprint of rural solid waste disposal-example in Yuhong District of Shenyang[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2012, 16:95-101 doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2012.10.013 |
| [34] | 唐冲, 马礼, 魏爱青, 等.河北省坝上地区农业生态足迹计算与分析——以河北省尚义县为例[J].中国生态农业学报, 2007, 15(3):150-154 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2007339&flag=1 TANG C, MA L, WEI A Q, et al. Calculation and analysis of agricultural ecological footprint in Bashang Plateau, Hebei Province-A case study of Shangyi County[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2007, 15(3):150-154 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2007339&flag=1 |
| [35] | 靳之更.沈阳市农业生态足迹初步分析[J].环境保护科学, 2008, 34(1):50-52 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6216.2008.01.016 JIN Z G. Preliminary analysis on Shenyang agriculture ecological trail[J]. Environmental Protection Science, 2008, 34(1):50-52 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6216.2008.01.016 |
| [36] | 孙维, 余成群, 李少伟.日喀则市农业生态足迹研究[J].环境科学研究, 2008, 21(5):214-218 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hjkxyj200805040 SUN W, YU C Q, LI S W. Study on agricultural ecological footprint for Shigatse City[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2008, 21(5):214-218 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hjkxyj200805040 |
| [37] | PASSERI N, BORUCKE M, BLASI E, et al. The influence of farming technique on cropland:A new approach for the Ecological Footprint[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2013, 29:1-5 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.11.022 |
| [38] | BLASI E, PASSERI N, FRANCO S, et al. An ecological footprint approach to environmental-economic evaluation of farm results[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2016, 145:76-82 doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.02.013 |
| [39] | 杨平.楚雄州农业生态足迹计算与分析[J].云南农业科技, 2011, (2):4-7 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0488.2011.02.001 YANG P. Calculation and analysis on agricultural ecological footprint in Chuxiong Prefecture[J].Yunnan Agricultural Science and Technology, 2011, (2):4-7 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0488.2011.02.001 |
| [40] | 张立志, 马寨璞, 安秋丹.河北省农业生态足迹动态测度与分析[J].黑龙江农业科学, 2012, (8):126-129 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hljnykx201208038 ZHANG L Z, MA Z P, AN Q D. Dynamic change and analysis of agriculture ecological footprint in Hebei Province[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2012, (8):126-129 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hljnykx201208038 |
| [41] | 蒋缠文.基于生态足迹的陕西省农业可持续发展评价[J].贵州农业科学, 2018, 46(6):164-166 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2018.06.037 JIANG C W. Evaluation of agricultural sustainable development based on ecological footprint in Shaanxi[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(6):164-166 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2018.06.037 |
| [42] | 林永钦, 熊雪, 傅春.鄱阳湖生态经济区农业循环经济发展综合评价[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(12):1532-1536 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=cjlyzyyhj201112019 LIN Y Q, XIONG X, FU C. Comprehensive evaluation on the development of agricultural circular economy in Poyang Lake Eco-Economic Zone[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2011, 20(12):1532-1536 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=cjlyzyyhj201112019 |
| [43] | 杨秋.基于能值理论与生态足迹模型的甘肃省农业生态系统可持续发展研究[D].兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2013 YANG Q. The research of Gansu agricultural ecosystem sustainable development on the base of emergy theory and model of ecological footprint[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2013 |
| [44] | LIU Z, WANG D Y, NING T Y, et al. Sustainability assessment of straw utilization circulation modes based on the emergetic ecological footprint[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 75:1-7 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.024 |
| [45] | 张瑞英, 席建超, 葛全胜.基于生命周期理论的旅游者碳足迹分析:一种"低碳旅游"测度框架及其实证研究[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2015, 29(6):169-175 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ghqzyyhj201506029 ZHANG R Y, XI J C, GE Q S. Life cycle of tourist carbon footprint (TCF-LCA):A "low carbon tourism" measurement method[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2015, 29(6):169-175 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ghqzyyhj201506029 |
| [46] | SILALERTRUKSA T, GHEEWALA S H. Land-water-energy nexus of sugarcane production in Thailand[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 182:521-528 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.085 |
| [47] | 赵桂慎, 王一超, 唐晓伟, 等.基于能值生态足迹法的集约化农田生态系统可持续性评价[J].农业工程学报, 2014, 30(18):159-167 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.18.020 ZHAO G S, WANG Y C, TANG X W, et al. Evaluation of sustainability for intensive farmland ecosystem based on emergy ecological footprint[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(18):159-167 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.18.020 |
| [48] | BAI X M, WEN Z M, AN S S, et al. Evaluating sustainability of cropland use in Yuanzhou County of the Loess Plateau, China:Using an emergy-based ecological footprint[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(3):e0118282 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118282 |
| [49] | 王琦, 易桂花, 张廷斌, 等.基于生态足迹模型的四川省耕地资源评价[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(1):80-87 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cjlyzyyhj201801010 WANG Q, YI G H, ZHANG T B, et al. Evaluation of cultivated land resource in Sichuan Province based on ecological footprint model[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018, 27(1):80-87 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cjlyzyyhj201801010 |
| [50] | 吴开亚, 王玲杰.基于全球公顷和国家公顷的生态足迹核算差异分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2007, 17(5):80-83 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2007.05.016 WU K Y, WANG L J. Accounting discrepancies of ecological footprint based on global hectare and national hectare[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2007, 17(5):80-83 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2007.05.016 |
| [51] | WACKERNAGEL M, REES W E. Our Ecological Footprint:Reducing Human Impact on the Earth[M]. Gabriola Island, BC:New Society Publishers, 1996:9-13 |
| [52] | 荆治国, 周杰, 齐丽彬, 等.基于特征参量调整法的中国省域生态足迹研究[J].资源科学, 2007, 29(5):9-15 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2007.05.002 JING Z G, ZHOU J, QI L B, et al. Provincial ecological footprint of China based on characteristic parameters adjustment[J] Resources Science, 2007, 29(5):9-15 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2007.05.002 |
| [53] | 王大庆.黑龙江省生态足迹与生态安全分析及其可持续发展对策[D].哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2008 WANG D Q. Analyses on EF and ES and sustainable development in Heilongjiang Province[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2008 |
| [54] | MóZNER Z, TABI A, CSUTORA M. Modifying the yield factor based on more efficient use of fertilizer-The environmental impacts of intensive and extensive agricultural practices[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 16:58-66 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.034 |
| [55] | 施开放, 刁承泰, 孙秀锋, 等.基于耕地生态足迹的重庆市耕地生态承载力供需平衡研究[J].生态学报, 2013, 33(6):1872-1880 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201306021 SHI K F, DIAO C T, SUN X F, et al. Ecological balance between supply and demand in Chongqing City based on cultivated land ecological footprint method[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(6):1872-1880 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201306021 |
| [56] | 曹淑艳, 谢高地, 陈文辉, 等.中国主要农产品生产的生态足迹研究[J].自然资源学报, 2014, 29(8):1336-1344 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zrzyxb201408006 CAO S Y, XIE G D, CHEN W H, et al. Ecological footprint of raw and derived agricultural products[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(8):1336-1344 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zrzyxb201408006 |
| [57] | WACKERNAGEL M, ONISTO L, BELLO P, et al. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29(3):375-390 doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)90063-5 |
| [58] | WACKERNAGEL M, MONFREDA C, ERB K H, et al. Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961-1999:Comparing the conventional approach to an 'actual land area' approach[J]. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(3):261-269 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.007 |
| [59] | WWF International. Living planet report 2006[EB/OL]. http://wwf.panda.org/knowledge_hub/all_publications/living_planet_report_timeline/lpr_2006/ |
| [60] | 刘钦普.基于生态足迹改进模型的江苏省耕地利用可持续性研究[D].南京: 南京师范大学, 2007 LIU Q P. Study on the sustainability of cropland use in Jiangsu based on the modified ecological footprint model[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University, 2007 |
| [61] | 刘某承.李文华.基于净初级生产力的中国生态足迹均衡因子测算[J].自然资源学报, 2009, 24(9):1550-1559 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2009.09.005 LIU M C, LI W H. The calculation of China's equivalence factor under ecological footprint mode based on Net Primary Production[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(9):1550-1559 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2009.09.005 |
| [62] | MAIER S, SZERENCSITS M, NARODOSLAWSKY M, et al. Current potential of more sustainable biomass production using eco-efficient farming practices in Austria[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 155:23-27 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.037 |
| [63] | BUDRESKI K, WINCHELL M, PADILLA L, et al. A probabilistic approach for estimating the spatial extent of pesticide agricultural use sites and potential co-occurrence with listed species for use in ecological risk assessments[J]. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2016, 12(2):315-327 doi: 10.1002/ieam.1677 |
