武雪1,
朱家蓠1,
张辉2,
贾克敬2,
赵爽1
1.北京师范大学环境学院/水环境模拟国家重点实验室 北京 100875
2.中国土地勘测规划院 北京 100875
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金面上项目41571173
国家重点研发计划项目2016YFC0502103
详细信息
作者简介:刘世梁, 主要从事景观生态学、恢复生态学、环境影响评价与规划等方面研究。E-mail:shiliangliu@bnu.edu.cn
中图分类号:Q149;F205计量
文章访问数:705
HTML全文浏览量:15
PDF下载量:1410
被引次数:0
出版历程
收稿日期:2018-10-13
录用日期:2018-11-06
刊出日期:2019-05-01
Evaluation of regional ecological carrying capacity coupling with landscape pattern and ecosystem services
LIU Shiliang1,,WU Xue1,
ZHU Jiali1,
ZHANG Hui2,
JIA Kejing2,
ZHAO Shuang1
1. School of Environment, Beijing Normal University/State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, Beijing 100875, China
2. China Land Surveying and Planning Institute, Beijing 100875, China
Funds: the National Natural Science Foundation of China41571173
the National Key Research and Development Project of China2016YFC0502103
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要
摘要:区域生态承载力评价是国土空间开发与规划的主要依据，其评价结果能反映人类开发与规划影响下的区域生态系统对人类的支撑与承载能力。现有的生态承载力评价方法中，以生态系统服务为主线的评估日渐成熟，但缺乏对生态系统受干扰程度及恢复能力的表征。因此，本研究以石家庄市为例，在生态承载力评价中引入景观格局与植被变化因子来体现生态系统受干扰程度，与生态系统服务构成具有3个准则、11个指标的综合指标体系。评价结果显示：基于栅格处理的石家庄市生态承载力空间分布基本呈现西部山区高，东部低的态势；其中，生态系统服务提供能力分布格局基本与综合生态承载力分布一致，而景观格局指数呈现镶嵌分布，植被变化指数表现为圈层分布，这说明不同指标对综合承载力的贡献存在差异。进一步对比区县及乡镇两级行政尺度的区域分析结果可以看出，小尺度上的指标分布异质性更高，不同级别地方政府的调控、管理方向应当更具有针对性。总体来看，石家庄市西部地区应着重将森林生态系统融入到城市的发展和建设中；东部区县需要处理好生态环境与经济发展的关系，通过生态空间的格局优化提升生态系统服务提供能力，从而提高国土空间综合承载力。
Abstract:The main basis of landscape development and planning is the evaluation of regional ecological carrying capacity. The results of this evaluation can reflect the extent to which ecological carrying capacity can remain unaffected by continuous development and planning activities of humans. Nowadays, among the existing methods for assessing ecological carrying capacity, the method based on ecosystem services value is relatively mature and widely used. However, the assessment of ecosystem services value is based on the classification of ecological land types in the region; therefore, it is difficult to apply where the land use status lacks extensibility and resilience. To fill this gap, this study coupled landscape pattern and vegetation change parameters with the ecosystem service provision capacity through a comprehensive index system with 3 criteria and 11 indicators. The landscape pattern determined the size, shape, and connectivity of various ecological patches, which in turn affected the abundance, distribution, and population viability and anti-interference ability of the landscape. Thus, landscape pattern indexes could be used to identify regional ecological protection priorities under urbanization, further improving regional environmental quality and resource utilization efficiency. The vegetation change index could spatially describe changes in breadth and depth of vegetation cover in regions, which were the result of the interaction between nature and human activities. This study applied the assessment model to Shijiazhuang City, measuring its comprehensive ecological carrying capacity at the grid, township and district scale. The results showed that the spatial distribution of the ecological carrying capacity of Shijiazhuang based on the grid analysis was relatively high in the western mountainous area and low in the east plain. Regarding the indicator layer, the distribution of ecosystem service provision capacity was relatively consistent with the comprehensive ecological carrying capacity distribution, whereas the landscape metrics presented a mosaic distribution pattern and the vegetation change index represented a circle layer distribution pattern. Meanwhile, the spatial heterogeneity of the first-level indicators was more significant. The further regional analysis results focusing on the administrative scales of districts and townships showed that the indicator distribution on smaller scale was more heterogeneous, and evaluation results in some regions were inconsistent with those assessed at higher administrative level. Therefore, local decision-makers should adjust more targeted management objectives and actions according to the jurisdiction. In general, through horizontal analysis in space and vertical contrast on scales, western Shijiazhuang City should focus on integrating the forest ecosystem conservation into urban development and construction; the eastern districts and townships should coordinate between the ecological environment and economic development, and improve the ecosystem service capacity through the optimization of ecological space patterns, thereby improving the comprehensive carrying capacity of national land space.
HTML全文
图1石家庄生态承载力评价流程图
Figure1.flow chart of ecological carrying capacity evaluation of Shijiazhuang
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图22015年石家庄市生态系统服务提供能力及其各指标评价值的空间分布
图中数字为区县代码。1:行唐县; 2:灵寿县; 3:平山县; 4:新乐市; 5:藳城区; 6:无极县; 7:辛集市; 8:深泽县; 9:晋州市; 10:栾城区; 11:赵县; 12:元氏县; 13:高邑县; 14:赞皇县; 15:井陉县; 16:矿区; 17:鹿泉区; 18:正定县; 19:新华区; 20:裕华区; 21:长安区; 22:桥西区。
Figure2.spatial distribution maps of the ecosystem service provision capacity and indicators of Shijiazhuang in 2015
The numbers in figures stand for districts/counties. 1: Xingtang; 2: Lingshou; 3: Pingshan; 4: Xinle; 5: Gaocheng; 6: Wuji; 7: Xinji; 8: Shenze; 9: Jinzhou; 10: Luancheng; 11: Zhaoxian; 12: Yuanshi; 13: Gaoyi; 14: Zanhuang; 15: Jingxing; 16: Kuangqu; 17: Luquan; 18: Zhengding; 19: Xinhua; 20: Yuhua; 21: Chang'an; 22: Qiaoxi.
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图32015年石家庄市景观格局指数及其各指标评价值的空间分布
图中数字为区县代码。1:行唐县; 2:灵寿县; 3:平山县; 4:新乐市; 5:藳城区; 6:无极县; 7:辛集市; 8:深泽县; 9:晋州市; 10:栾城区; 11:赵县; 12:元氏县; 13:高邑县; 14:赞皇县; 15:井陉县; 16:矿区; 17:鹿泉区; 18:正定县; 19:新华区; 20:裕华区; 21:长安区; 22:桥西区。
Figure3.The spatial distribution maps of the landscape pattern index and indicators of Shijiazhuang in 2015
The numbers in figures stand for districts/counties. 1: Xingtang; 2: Lingshou; 3: Pingshan; 4: Xinle; 5: Gaocheng; 6: Wuji; 7: Xinji; 8: Shenze; 9: Jinzhou; 10: Luancheng; 11: Zhaoxian; 12: Yuanshi; 13: Gaoyi; 14: Zanhuang; 15: Jingxing; 16: Kuangqu; 17: Luquan; 18: Zhengding; 19: Xinhua; 20: Yuhua; 21: Chang'an; 22: Qiaoxi.
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图42000—2017年石家庄市植被变化指数空间分布
图中数字为区县代码。1:行唐县; 2:灵寿县; 3:平山县; 4:新乐市; 5:藳城区; 6:无极县; 7:辛集市; 8:深泽县; 9:晋州市; 10:栾城区; 11:赵县; 12:元氏县; 13:高邑县; 14:赞皇县; 15:井陉县; 16:矿区; 17:鹿泉区; 18:正定县; 19:新华区; 20:裕华区; 21:长安区; 22:桥西区。
Figure4.The spatial distribution map of the vegetation change index of Shijiazhuang from 2000 to 2017
The numbers in figures stand for districts/counties. 1: Xingtang; 2: Lingshou; 3: Pingshan; 4: Xinle; 5: Gaocheng; 6: Wuji; 7: Xinji; 8: Shenze; 9: Jinzhou; 10: Luancheng; 11: Zhaoxian; 12: Yuanshi; 13: Gaoyi; 14: Zanhuang; 15: Jingxing; 16: Kuangqu; 17: Luquan; 18: Zhengding; 19: Xinhua; 20: Yuhua; 21: Chang'an; 22: Qiaoxi.
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图52015年石家庄市区县(图a, c, e)、乡镇(图b, d, f)两级行政单位下的生态承载力要素评价结果
图中数字为区县代码。1:行唐县; 2:灵寿县; 3:平山县; 4:新乐市; 5:藳城区; 6:无极县; 7:辛集市; 8:深泽县; 9:晋州市; 10:栾城区; 11:赵县; 12:元氏县; 13:高邑县; 14:赞皇县; 15:井陉县; 16:矿区; 17:鹿泉区; 18:正定县; 19:新华区; 20:裕华区; 21:长安区; 22:桥西区。
Figure5.Evaluation results of 3 ecological carrying capacity elements at district (a, c, e) and township (b, d, f) scales of Shijiazhuang in 2015
The numbers in figures stand for districts/counties. 1: Xingtang; 2: Lingshou; 3: Pingshan; 4: Xinle; 5: Gaocheng; 6: Wuji; 7: Xinji; 8: Shenze; 9: Jinzhou; 10: Luancheng; 11: Zhaoxian; 12: Yuanshi; 13: Gaoyi; 14: Zanhuang; 15: Jingxing; 16: Kuangqu; 17: Luquan; 18: Zhengding; 19: Xinhua; 20: Yuhua; 21: Chang'an; 22: Qiaoxi.
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图62015年石家庄市生态承载力在栅格(a)、区县(b)和乡镇(c)尺度上的空间分布特征
图中数字为区县代码。1:行唐县; 2:灵寿县; 3:平山县; 4:新乐市; 5:藳城区; 6:无极县; 7:辛集市; 8:深泽县; 9:晋州市; 10:栾城区; 11:赵县; 12:元氏县; 13:高邑县; 14:赞皇县; 15:井陉县; 16:矿区; 17:鹿泉区; 18:正定县; 19:新华区; 20:裕华区; 21:长安区; 22:桥西区。
Figure6.Spatial distribution maps of ecological carrying capacity of Shijiazhuang in 2015 on grid (a), district/county (b) and township (c) scales
The numbers in figures stand for districts/counties. 1: Xingtang; 2: Lingshou; 3: Pingshan; 4: Xinle; 5: Gaocheng; 6: Wuji; 7: Xinji; 8: Shenze; 9: Jinzhou; 10: Luancheng; 11: Zhaoxian; 12: Yuanshi; 13: Gaoyi; 14: Zanhuang; 15: Jingxing; 16: Kuangqu; 17: Luquan; 18: Zhengding; 19: Xinhua; 20: Yuhua; 21: Chang'an; 22: Qiaoxi.
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片表1生态承载力综合评价指标及权重
Table1.Contents and weights of evaluation indexes of ecological carrying capacity
| 准则层 Criteria layer | 准则层权重 Criterion layer weight | 指标层 Indicator layer | 水土保持重点生态功能区 Key ecological functional areas for soil and water conservation | 其他地区 Other areas |
| 生态系统服务提供能力 Ecosystem services provision capacity | 0.7 | 碳固定Carbon sequestration | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| 水土保持Soil and water conservation | 0.20 | 0.11 | ||
| 水源涵养Water source conservation | 0.10 | 0.11 | ||
| 生物多样性保护Biodiversity conservation | 0.10 | 0.11 | ||
| 防风固沙Wind erosion prevention | 0.10 | 0.11 | ||
| 休憩能力Cultural recreation services | 0.10 | 0.11 | ||
| 景观格局指数 Landscape pattern index | 0.2 | 最大斑块指数Largest patch index | — | 0.05 |
| 景观形状指数Landscape shape index | — | 0.05 | ||
| 香农多样性指数Shannon diversity index | — | 0.05 | ||
| 蔓延度指数Contagion index | — | 0.05 | ||
| 植被变化指数 Vegetation change index | 0.1 | 净初级生产力变化率NPP-slope | — | 0.10 |
下载: 导出CSV参考文献
| [1] | 朱嘉伟, 谢晓彤, 李心慧.生态环境承载力评价研究——以河南省为例[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(21):7039-7047 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201721003 ZHU J W, XIE X T, LI X H. A solution to the problem of ecological environmental carrying capacity evaluation:A case study of Henan Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(21):7039-7047 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201721003 |
| [2] | 石月珍, 赵洪杰.生态承载力定量评价方法的研究进展[J].人民黄河, 2005, 27(3):6-8 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2005.03.003 SHI Y Z, ZHAO H J. Progress of study on quantitative evaluation methods of ecological carrying capacity[J]. Yellow River, 2005, 27(3):6-8 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2005.03.003 |
| [3] | 高吉喜.可持续发展理论探索[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2001:13, 185 GAO J X. Exploration of Sustainable Development Theory[M]. Beijing:China Environmental Science Press, 2001:13, 185 |
| [4] | 杨志峰, 隋欣.基于生态系统健康的生态承载力评价[J].环境科学学报, 2005, 25(5):586-594 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2468.2005.05.004 YANG Z F, SUI X. Assessment of the ecological carrying capacity based on the ecosystem health[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2005, 25(5):586-594 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2468.2005.05.004 |
| [5] | 牛翠娟, 娄安如, 孙儒泳, 等.基础生态学[M].第2版.北京:高等教育出版社, 2007:10, 412 NIU C J, LOU A R, SUN R Y, et al. Fundamentals of Ecology[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2007:10, 412 |
| [6] | 高鹭, 张宏业.生态承载力的国内外研究进展[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2007, 17(2):19-26 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2007.02.004 GAO L, ZHANG H Y. Progress in research of ecological carrying capacity[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2007, 17(2):19-26 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2007.02.004 |
| [7] | 王家骥, 姚小红, 李京荣, 等.黑河流域生态承载力估测[J].环境科学研究, 2000, 13(2):44-48 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-6929.2000.02.013 WANG J J, YAO X H, LI J R, et al. Assessment for ecological carrying capacity of Heihe River basin[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2000, 13(2):44-48 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-6929.2000.02.013 |
| [8] | MA P P, YE G Q, PENG X, et al. Development of an index system for evaluation of ecological carrying capacity of marine ecosystems[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2017, 144:23-30 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=b47266eee6decd38d077dadccc98b975 |
| [9] | 吕一河, 傅微, 李婷, 等.区域资源环境综合承载力研究进展与展望[J].地理科学进展, 2018, 37(1):130-138 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dlkxjz201801014 LYU Y H, FU W, LI T, et al. Progress and prospects of research on integrated carrying capacity of regional resources and environment[J]. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(1):130-138 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dlkxjz201801014 |
| [10] | 芦艳艳, 许明军.服务于土地规划的资源环境承载力评价技术探讨[J].国土与自然资源研究, 2017, (2):45-48 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7853.2017.02.013 LU Y Y, XU M J. Discussion on evaluation technology of resources and environment carrying capacity services for land planning[J]. Territory & Natural Resources Study, 2017, (2):45-48 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7853.2017.02.013 |
| [11] | 曹智, 闵庆文, 刘某承, 等.基于生态系统服务的生态承载力:概念、内涵与评估模型及应用[J].自然资源学报, 2015, 30(1):1-11 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZX201501001.htm CAO Z, MIN Q W, LIU M C, et al. Ecosystem-service-based ecological carrying capacity:Concept, content, assessment model and application[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(1):1-11 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZX201501001.htm |
| [12] | NAKAJIMA E S, ORTEGA E. Carrying capacity using emergy and a new calculation of the ecological footprint[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 60:1200-1207 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.054 |
| [13] | 张可云, 傅帅雄, 张文彬.基于改进生态足迹模型的中国31个省级区域生态承载力实证研究[J].地理科学, 2011, 31(9):1084-1089 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dlkx201109009 ZHANG K Y, FU S X, ZHANG W B. Ecological carrying capacity of 31 provinces based on improved ecological footprint model[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2011, 31(9):1084-1089 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dlkx201109009 |
| [14] | 周涛, 王云鹏, 龚健周, 等.生态足迹的模型修正与方法改进[J].生态学报, 2015, 35(14):4592-4603 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201514004 ZHOU T, WANG Y P, GONG J Z, et al. Ecological footprint model modification and method improvement[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(14):4592-4603 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201514004 |
| [15] | OUYANG Z Y, ZHENG H, XIAO Y, et al. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital[J]. Science, 2016, 352:1455-1459 doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2295 |
| [16] | 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 成升魁, 等.中国的生态空间占用研究[J].资源科学, 2001, 23(6):20-23 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2001.06.005 XIE G D, LU C X, CHENG S K, et al. Evaluation of natural capital utilization with ecological footprint in China[J]. Resources Science, 2001, 23(6):20-23 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2001.06.005 |
| [17] | YUE D X, XU X F, LI Z Z, et al. Spatiotemporal analysis of ecological footprint and biological capacity of Gansu, China 1991-2015:Down from the environmental cliff[J]. Ecological Economics, 2006, 58(2):393-406 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.029 |
| [18] | 李小玉, 武开拓, 肖笃宁.石羊河流域及其典型绿洲景观动态变化研究[J].冰川冻土, 2004, 26(6):747-754 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0240.2004.06.013 LI X Y, WU K T, XIAO D N. Studies on the landscape dynamics of the Shiyang River watershed and its typical oases[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2004, 26(6):747-754 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0240.2004.06.013 |
| [19] | PENG J, YANG Y, LIU Y X, et al. Linking ecosystem services and circuit theory to identify ecological security patterns[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 644:781-790 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.292 |
| [20] | 肖笃宁, 高峻, 石铁矛.景观生态学在城市规划和管理中的应用[J].地球科学进展, 2001, 16(6):813-820 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2001.06.010 XIAO D N, GAO J, SHI T M. Application of landscape ecology in urban planning and management[J]. Advance in Earth Sciences, 2001, 16(6):813-820 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2001.06.010 |
| [21] | 李传华, 赵军, 师银芳, 等.基于变异系数的植被NPP人为影响定量研究——以石羊河流域为例[J].生态学报, 2016, 36(13):4034-4044 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201613020 LI C H, ZHAO J, SHI Y F, et al. The impact of human activities on net primary productivity based on the coefficient of variation:A case study of the Shiyang River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(13):4034-4044 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201613020 |
| [22] | 张贵军, 朱永明, 张蓬涛, 等.石家庄市耕地资源人口承载力评价[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2013, 34(6):120-126 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgnyzyyqh201306018 ZHANG G J, ZHU Y M, ZHANG P T, et al. Evaluation on population carrying capacity of cultivated land in Shijiazhuang City[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2013, 34(6):120-126 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgnyzyyqh201306018 |
| [23] | 阎东彬.京津冀一体化进程中重点城市综合承载力研究[J].国家行政学院学报, 2015, (2):68-72 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9314.2015.02.011 YAN D B. Study on comprehensive carrying capacity of key cities in the process of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Integration[J]. Journal of China National School of Administration, 2015, (2):68-72 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9314.2015.02.011 |
| [24] | 伴晓淼, 温洪艳, 宋保华, 等.基于生态足迹的石家庄市生态承载力评价[J].资源开发与市场, 2010, 26(12):1074-1077 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2010.12.006 BAN X M, WEN H Y, SONG B H, et al. Ecological carrying capacity evaluation of Shijiazhuang City based on ecological footprint[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2010, 26(12):1074-1077 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2010.12.006 |
| [25] | 赵文英, 刘小强, 赵江伟, 等.石家庄市大气环境承载力研究[J].环境与可持续发展, 2017, 42(1):138-139 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-288X.2017.01.041 ZHAO W Y, LIU X Q, ZHAO J W, et al. Shijiazhuang atmospheric environmental capacity research[J]. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2017, 42(1):138-139 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-288X.2017.01.041 |
| [26] | 汪彦博, 王嵩峰, 周培疆.石家庄市水环境承载力的系统动力学研究[J].环境科学与技术, 2006, 29(3):26-27 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2006.03.012 WANG Y B, WANG S F, ZHOU P J. Estimating water environmental carrying capacity in Shijiazhuang City using system dynamics[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 29(3):26-27 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2006.03.012 |
| [27] | 刘敏, 聂振龙, 王金哲, 等.华北平原地下水资源承载力评价[J].南水北调与水利科技, 2017, 15(4):13-18 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nsbdyslkj201704003 LIU M, NIE Z L, WANG J Z, et al. Evaluation of groundwater resources carrying capacity in North China Plain[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 2017, 15(4):13-18 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nsbdyslkj201704003 |
| [28] | 徐卫华, 杨琰瑛, 张路, 等.区域生态承载力预警评估方法及案例研究[J].地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3):306-312 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dlkxjz201703005 XU W H, YANG Y Y, ZHANG L, et al. Evaluation methods and case study of regional ecological carrying capacity for early-warning[J]. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(3):306-312 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dlkxjz201703005 |
| [29] | 杨胜利, 高晓巍, 武爱彬.基于生态足迹的石家庄市土地生态承载力评价[J].河北省科学院学报, 2013, 30(1):69-77 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9383.2013.01.015 YANG S L, GAO X W, WU A B. Evaluation of ecological carrying capacity based on ecological footprint model in Shijiazhuang[J]. Journal of the Hebei Academy of Sciences, 2013, 30(1):69-77 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9383.2013.01.015 |
| [30] | 梁彦庆.土地利用/土地覆被变化的生态环境效应研究——以石家庄西部太行山区为例[D].石家庄: 河北师范大学, 2004 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10094-2004088820.htm LIANG Y Q. Research on regional land use and land cover change and associated effects on eco-environment: A case study in the Western Taihang Mountain Area of Shijiazhuang City[D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Normal University, 2004 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10094-2004088820.htm |
| [31] | 朱文泉, 潘耀忠, 张锦水.中国陆地植被净初级生产力遥感估算[J].植物生态学报, 2007, 31(3):413-424 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2007.03.010 ZHU W Q, PAN Y Z, ZHANG J S. Estimation of net primary productivity of Chinese terrestrial vegetation based on remote sensing[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(3):413-424 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2007.03.010 |
| [32] | WILLIAMS J R. The erosion-productivity impact calculator (EPIC) model:A case history[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B:Biological Sciences, 1990, 329(1255):421-428 doi: 10.1098/rstb.1990.0184 |
| [33] | 刘世梁, 赵爽, 成方妍, 等.市域尺度两种生态系统服务评价方法对比研究[J].中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(9):1315-1323 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2018-0906&flag=1 LIU S L, ZHAO S, CHENG F Y, et al. Comparative study on two evaluating methods of ecosystem services at city-scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018, 26(9):1315-1323 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2018-0906&flag=1 |
| [34] | BURKHARD B, KROLL F, M LLER F, et al. Landscapes' capacities to provide ecosystem services-A concept for land-cover based assessments[J]. Landscape Online, 2009, 15(1):1-22 |
| [35] | WACKERNAGEL M, SCHULZ N B, DEUMLING D, et al. Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002, 99(14):9266-9271 doi: 10.1073/pnas.142033699 |
| [36] | 魏虎进, 黄华梅, 张晓浩.基于生态系统服务功能的海湾滩涂资源环境承载力研究——以大亚湾为例[J].海洋环境科学, 2018, 37(4):579-585 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hyhjkx201804015 WEI H J, HUANG H M, ZHANG X H. Research on marine resource and environment carrying capacity based on marine ecosystem services-A case study of Daya bay[J]. Marine Environmental Science, 2018, 37(4):579-585 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hyhjkx201804015 |
| [37] | 刘金雅, 汪东川, 张利辉, 等.基于多边界改进的京津冀城市群生态系统服务价值估算[J].生态学报, 2018, 38(12):4192-4204 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201812009 LIU J Y, WANG D C, ZHANG L H, et al. Estimation of the ecosystem service value of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration based on multi-boundary improvement[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(12):4192-4204 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201812009 |
| [38] | 王恒博, 姚顺波, 郭亚军, 等.基于生态足迹-服务价值法的生态承载力时空演化[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10):2316-2327 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cjlyzyyhj201810017 WANG H B, YAO S B, GUO Y J, et al. Spatial and temporal evolution of ecological carrying capacity based on ecological footprint-service value approach[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018, 27(10):2316-2327 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cjlyzyyhj201810017 |
| [39] | 刘东, 封志明, 杨艳昭.基于生态足迹的中国生态承载力供需平衡分析[J].自然资源学报, 2012, 27(4):614-624 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hbnykx201520021 LIU D, FENG Z M, YANG Y Z. Ecological balance between supply and demand in China using ecological footprint method[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012, 27(4):614-624 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hbnykx201520021 |
| [40] | 钟维琼, 代涛, 高湘昀.产业发展与资源环境承载力研究综述[J].资源与产业, 2016, 18(6):74-80 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zycy201606012 ZHONG W Q, DAI T, GAO X Y. Research overview of industrial development and resource environment carrying capacity[J]. Resources & Industries, 2016, 18(6):74-80 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zycy201606012 |
| [41] | ZHOU X Y, LEI K, MENG W, et al. Industrial structural upgrading and spatial optimization based on water environment carrying capacity[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 165:1462-1472 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.246 |
| [42] | 王宏卫, 安秀峰, 塔西甫拉提·特依拜, 等.基于乡镇尺度的克里雅河绿洲生态承载力分析——以于田县13个乡镇生态承载力为例[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2015, 29(10):48-55 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-GHZH201510009.htm WANG H W, AN X F, TAXIFULATI·TEYIBAI, et al. Assessment on the ecological carrying capacity of towns in Yutian County[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2015, 29(10):48-55 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-GHZH201510009.htm |
| [43] | 汪霞, 张洋洋, 怡欣, 等.基于生态足迹模型的舟曲县生态承载力空间差异[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版, 2014, 50(5):687-691 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lzdxxb201405018 WANG X, ZHANG Y Y, YI X, et al. Spatial differences of ecological carrying capacity in Zhouqu County based on the ecological footprint method[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University:Natural Sciences, 2014, 50(5):687-691 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lzdxxb201405018 |
| [44] | 赵东升, 郭彩贇, 郑度, 等.生态承载力研究进展[J].生态学报, 2019, 39(2):399-410 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tryhj200605044 ZHAO D S, GUO C Y, ZHENG D, et al. Review of ecological carrying capacity[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(2):399-410 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tryhj200605044 |
