李葛,
张超,
赵丽,
朱永明,
河北农业大学国土资源学院 保定 071001
基金项目: 河北省社会科学基金项目HB17GL060
详细信息
作者简介:刘倩, 主要研究方向为土地评价。E-mail:15933581757@163.com
通讯作者:朱永明, 主要研究方向为土地资源利用与规划。E-mail:zhyming2005@126.com
中图分类号:F301.24计量
文章访问数:1069
HTML全文浏览量:0
PDF下载量:4642
被引次数:0
出版历程
收稿日期:2018-10-19
录用日期:2019-02-05
刊出日期:2019-06-01
Study on dynamic changes in ecosystem service values in Qinglong County based on coefficient correction
LIU Qian,LI Ge,
ZHANG Chao,
ZHAO Li,
ZHU Yongming,
College of Land and Resources, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding 071001, China
Funds: the Social Science Foundation of Hebei ProvinceHB17GL060
More Information
Corresponding author:ZHU Yongming, E-mail: zhyming2005@126.com
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要
摘要:生态系统服务价值是反映一个区域生态环境状况和生态效益的重要指标，生态系统服务价值变化对区域生态建设及可持续发展具有重要意义。本文以河北省青龙县为研究区，基于Costanza生态系统服务价值评估模型，参考谢高地等的研究成果，采用区域差异性系数、社会发展修正系数，调整生态服务价值当量因子表，构建了生态系统服务价值动态评估模型，对青龙县2006—2016年间生态系统服务功能价值动态变化情况做出了评估与分析。研究结果表明：1）2006—2016年青龙县生态系统服务功能总价值呈增加-减少-增加的变化趋势，总量增加45.07亿元，年均变化量为4.51亿元，年均变化率为4.54%；2）各种土地利用类型中，林地、园地所提供的生态系统服务功能价值最大，其次为水域、耕地，未利用地及湿地占比最少；3）研究区的生态系统服务功能价值结构总体趋于稳定，其占比大小依次为：生物多样性保护>水源涵养>气候调节>气体调节>土壤的形成与保护>原材料>废物处理>游憩文化>食物生产。不同地区的生态系统服务价值是存在差异的，且随着社会的发展而不断变化着。本研究与以往的生态系统服务价值评估模型相比，考虑到区位条件、社会发展对研究区的影响，对县域小尺度更具有适宜性，更能揭示区域生态系统服务价值的动态变化机制和效应。
关键词:生态系统服务价值/
系数修正/
区域差异系数/
社会发展修正系数/
青龙县
Abstract:Ecosystem service value is an important index to reflect the ecological environment condition and ecological benefit of a region, and the change of ecosystem service value is of great significance to regional ecological construction and sustainable development. In reference to the research of Xie Gaodi and others, the Costanza ecosystem service value assessment model was used to study the Qinglong County of Hebei Province. The regional differences coefficient and the correction coefficient of social development were used to adjust the table of equivalent factors of the ecological service value. A new dynamic assessment model for ecosystem service value was constructed, and the dynamic changes in ecosystem service value in the Qinglong County were evaluated and analyzed from 2006 to 2016. The results of the study indicate that:1) the total ecosystem service value of Qinglong County in 2006-2016 showed a trend of increase-decrease-increase, with a total increase of 4.507 billion Yuan, an annual change of 451 million Yuan per year, and an annual average change rate of 4.54%. 2) Among different land types, forest land and garden land provided the highest value of ecosystem services, followed by water area and cultivated land, and unused land and wetland had the lowest value. 3) The value structure of the ecosystem service function of the whole research area remained stable, and the ranking was as follows:biodiversity conservation > water conservation > climate regulation > gas regulation > soil formation and protection > raw materials > waste disposal > recreation culture > food production. There were differences in the value of ecosystem services between different regions and the values were continually changing depending on the development of a society. Compared with previous static assessment models on ecosystem service values, this study took into account the impact of location conditions and social development in the study area. The model is more suitable for a small-scale county and can reveal the dynamic change mechanism and effect of a regional ecosystem service value.
Key words:Ecosystem services value/
Coefficient correction/
Regional differences coefficient/
Correction coefficient of social development/
Qinglong County
HTML全文
图12006—2016年青龙县各土地类型生态系统服务价值构成图
Figure1.Composition of ecosystem service value of different land types in Qinglong County from 2006 to 2016
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图22006—2016年各土地利用类型生态系统服务价值变化图
Figure2.Changes of ecosystem service value of land use types in Qinglong County from 2006 to 2016
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图32006—2016年青龙县各项生态系统服务功能平均价值构成图
Figure3.Composition of the average value of each ecosystem services function in Qinglong County from 2006 to 2016
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图42006—2016年青龙县不同生态系统服务功能变化图
Figure4.Changes of different ecosystem service functions in Qinglong County from 2006 to 2016
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片表1中国陆地生态系统服务价值当量因子表(2007年)
Table1.Equivalent factor table of terrestrial ecosystem service value in China (2007)
| 生态系统服务功能 Ecosystem service function | 森林 Forest | 草地 Meadow | 农田 Farmland | 湿地 Wetland | 水体 Water area | 荒漠 Desert | |
| 供给服务Supply | 食物生产Food production | 0.33 | 0.43 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.53 | 0.02 |
| 原材料Raw material | 2.98 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 0.04 | |
| 调节服务Regulatory | 气体调节Air regulation | 4.32 | 1.50 | 0.72 | 2.41 | 0.51 | 0.06 |
| 气候调节Climate regulation | 4.07 | 1.56 | 0.97 | 13.55 | 2.06 | 0.13 | |
| 水源涵养Water conservation | 4.09 | 1.52 | 0.77 | 13.44 | 18.77 | 0.07 | |
| 废物处理Waste treatment | 1.72 | 1.32 | 1.39 | 14.40 | 14.85 | 0.26 | |
| 支持服务Support | 土壤形成与保护 Soil formation and protection | 4.02 | 2.24 | 1.47 | 1.99 | 0.41 | 0.17 |
| 生物多样性保护 Biodiversity conservation | 4.51 | 1.87 | 1.02 | 3.69 | 3.43 | 0.40 | |
| 文化服务Cultural | 游憩文化Recreation and culture | 2.08 | 0.87 | 0.17 | 4.69 | 4.44 | 0.24 |
| 合计Total | 28.12 | 11.67 | 7.90 | 54.77 | 45.35 | 1.39 | |
下载: 导出CSV表22006—2016年青龙县单位面积农田生态系统食物生产经济价值
Table2.Economic value produced by food production of farmland per unit area in Qinglong County from 2006 to 2016
| 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |
| 种植面积Cultivation area (104hm2) | 2.87 | 2.89 | 2.71 | 2.89 | 2.87 | 2.83 | 2.83 | 2.80 | 2.72 | 2.72 | 2.73 |
| 单位面积粮食产值Economic output per unit area (104￥·hm-2) | 1.02 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.98 | 1.07 | 1.08 | 1.11 | 1.13 | 1.12 | 1.13 | 1.16 |
| 1个当量因子的值(Et) An equivalent factor value | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.17 |
下载: 导出CSV表3青龙县区域差异系数表
Table3.Regional difference coefficient in Qinglong County
| 指标Index | 青龙县 Qinglong County | 全国 Nationwide |
| 年平均气温(t) Annual mean temperature | 10.40 | 10.10 |
| 年降水量(R) Annual precipitation | 534.90 | 607.90 |
| 净初级生产力(NPP) Net primary productivity | 224.45 | 247.09 |
| 区域差异系数(Qt) Regional difference coefficient | 0.91 | 1.00 |
下载: 导出CSV表42006—2016年青龙县生态系统服务功能价值社会发展系数表
Table4.Social development coefficient of ecosystem service value in Qinglong County from 2006 to 2016
| 指标Index | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |
| 青龙县 Qinglong County | 城镇恩格尔系数 Town Engel coefficient | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.33 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.28 |
| 城镇人口比例权重 Weight of urban population proportion | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.27 | |
| 农村恩格尔系数 Rural Engel coefficient | 0.42 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.29 | |
| 农村人口比例权重 Weight of rural population proportion | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.73 | |
| l'研究区l' research area | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 0.61 | |
| 全国 Nationwide | 城镇恩格尔系数 Town Engel coefficient | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| 城镇人口权重 Weight of urban population proportion | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.56 | |
| 农村恩格尔系数 Rural Engel coefficient | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.37 | |
| 农村人口权重 Weight of urban population proportion | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.44 | |
| l'全国l' nationwide | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.37 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.45 | |
| 社会发展修正系数 Social development correction coefficient | 0.98 | 1.10 | 1.26 | 1.25 | 1.28 | 1.24 | 1.20 | 1.27 | 1.30 | 1.43 | 1.37 | |
下载: 导出CSV表5青龙县土地利用分类标准
Table5.Classification standard for land use of Qinglong County
| 一级类Level 1 | 二级分类Level 2 |
| 耕地Cultivated land | 水田、旱地、水浇地Paddy field, dry land, irrigated land |
| 园地Garden plot | 果园、其他园地Orchard, other gardens |
| 林地Forest land | 有林地、灌木林地、其他林地Forestland, shrub land, other woodland |
| 水域Water area | 河流、湖泊、水库、坑塘水面River, lakes, reservoir, pond surface |
| 湿地Wet land | 内陆滩涂Beaches and flats |
| 建设用地Building land | 城镇村及工矿用地、交通运输用地Urban villages and industrial and mining land, transportation land |
| 未利用地Unused land | 荒草地、裸地、其他Wasted land, bare land, others |
下载: 导出CSV表62006—2015年青龙县各土地利用类型的面积
Table6.Areas of different land use types in Qinglong County from 2006 to 2016
| hm2 | |||||||
| 年份 Year | 耕地 Arable land | 园地 Garden plot | 林地 Forest land | 水域 Water area | 湿地 Wet land | 建设用地 Building land | 未利用地 Unused land |
| 2006 | 29 582.14 | 48 683.69 | 143 381.68 | 5 346.63 | 2 051.39 | 14 254.30 | 103 860.44 |
| 2007 | 29 586.64 | 48 682.02 | 143 377.98 | 5 346.63 | 2 046.22 | 14 261.95 | 103 860.44 |
| 2008 | 29 719.10 | 48 654.63 | 143 363.17 | 5 246.60 | 2 088.19 | 14 269.42 | 103 829.80 |
| 2009 | 29 842.04 | 49 240.17 | 146 282.40 | 5 311.94 | 2 046.35 | 14 227.30 | 100 189.59 |
| 2010 | 29 836.65 | 49 740.49 | 148 009.15 | 5 259.26 | 2 072.59 | 14 236.81 | 97 162.18 |
| 2011 | 29 639.54 | 49 543.90 | 147 855.13 | 5 276.90 | 2 064.37 | 14 899.01 | 97 065.83 |
| 2012 | 29 611.97 | 49 534.34 | 147 812.89 | 5 267.81 | 2 082.51 | 15 262.92 | 97 040.90 |
| 2013 | 29 530.56 | 49 521.89 | 147 769.15 | 5 219.97 | 2 067.05 | 15 100.41 | 96 985.89 |
| 2014 | 29 643.03 | 49 614.92 | 147 926.36 | 5 201.35 | 2 074.12 | 15 000.45 | 97 125.23 |
| 2015 | 29 493.02 | 49 506.32 | 147 661.94 | 5 240.07 | 2 012.59 | 15 303.36 | 96 888.40 |
| 2016 | 29 455.76 | 49 493.65 | 147 620.38 | 5 236.42 | 2 009.49 | 15 395.83 | 96 869.96 |
下载: 导出CSV表72006—2016年青龙满族自治县不同土地利用类型的生态系统服务总价值
Table7.Ecosystem service values of different land use types in Qinglong County from 2006 to 2016
| 108￥ | |||||||
| 年份 Year | 耕地 Arable land | 园地 Garden plot | 林地 Forest land | 水域 Water area | 湿地 Wet land | 未利用地 Unused land | 合计 Total |
| 2006 | 3.05 | 11.45 | 52.58 | 3.16 | 1.47 | 1.88 | 73.60 |
| 2007 | 3.37 | 12.68 | 58.20 | 3.50 | 1.62 | 2.08 | 81.45 |
| 2008 | 3.62 | 13.53 | 62.13 | 3.67 | 1.76 | 2.22 | 86.94 |
| 2009 | 3.76 | 14.16 | 65.59 | 3.84 | 1.79 | 2.22 | 91.36 |
| 2010 | 4.19 | 15.96 | 74.05 | 4.24 | 2.02 | 2.40 | 102.87 |
| 2011 | 4.12 | 15.71 | 73.10 | 4.21 | 1.99 | 2.37 | 101.49 |
| 2012 | 4.07 | 15.56 | 72.39 | 4.16 | 1.99 | 2.35 | 100.53 |
| 2013 | 4.35 | 16.65 | 77.47 | 4.41 | 2.11 | 2.51 | 107.51 |
| 2014 | 4.37 | 16.69 | 77.55 | 4.40 | 2.12 | 2.52 | 107.63 |
| 2015 | 4.87 | 18.67 | 86.83 | 4.97 | 2.30 | 2.82 | 120.46 |
| 2016 | 4.79 | 18.40 | 85.54 | 4.89 | 2.27 | 2.77 | 118.67 |
| 平均值Average value | 4.05 | 15.41 | 71.40 | 4.13 | 1.95 | 2.38 | 99.32 |
下载: 导出CSV表8青龙县2006—2016年生态系统服务功能价值动态构成表
Table8.Composition of ecosystem service function value in Qinglong County from 2006 to 2016
| 108￥ | ||||||||||||
| 生态系统服务功能 Ecosystem service function | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 平均值 Average |
| 食物生产Food production | 1.50 | 1.39 | 1.36 | 1.86 | 2.09 | 1.79 | 2.04 | 2.18 | 2.18 | 2.44 | 2.41 | 1.93 |
| 原材料Raw material | 6.88 | 6.36 | 6.21 | 8.56 | 9.66 | 8.29 | 9.44 | 10.10 | 10.11 | 11.32 | 11.15 | 8.92 |
| 气体调节Air regulation | 10.14 | 9.37 | 9.16 | 12.61 | 14.23 | 12.20 | 13.90 | 14.87 | 14.89 | 16.67 | 16.42 | 13.13 |
| 气候调节Climate regulation | 10.27 | 9.49 | 9.28 | 12.76 | 14.38 | 12.33 | 14.05 | 15.03 | 15.05 | 16.83 | 16.58 | 13.28 |
| 水源涵养Water conservation | 11.25 | 10.40 | 10.15 | 13.95 | 15.70 | 13.47 | 15.35 | 16.41 | 16.42 | 18.38 | 18.11 | 14.51 |
| 土壤形成与保护 Soil formation and protection | 10.14 | 9.38 | 9.16 | 12.61 | 14.20 | 12.18 | 13.88 | 14.85 | 14.87 | 16.64 | 16.39 | 13.12 |
| 废物处理Waste treatment | 6.52 | 6.02 | 5.88 | 8.04 | 9.02 | 7.74 | 8.82 | 9.41 | 9.42 | 10.54 | 10.38 | 8.34 |
| 生物多样性保护 Biodiversity conservation | 11.47 | 10.60 | 10.35 | 14.23 | 16.02 | 13.74 | 15.65 | 16.74 | 16.76 | 18.76 | 18.48 | 14.80 |
| 游憩文化 Recreation and culture | 5.43 | 5.02 | 4.90 | 6.73 | 7.57 | 6.49 | 7.40 | 7.91 | 7.92 | 8.87 | 8.73 | 7.00 |
下载: 导出CSV参考文献
| [1] | 辜胜阻, 李华, 易善策.城镇化是扩大内需实现经济可持续发展的引擎[J].中国人口科学, 2010(3):2-10 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/7833798 GU S Z, LI H, YI S C. Urbanization as an engine for expanding domestic demand and sustaining economic growth[J]. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2010(3):2-10 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/7833798 |
| [2] | DAILY G C. Nature's Services:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M]. Washington:Island Press, 1997:1-317 |
| [3] | 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 成升魁.全球生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J].资源科学, 2001, 23(6):5-9 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2001.06.002 XIE G D, LU C X, CHENG S K. Progress in evaluating the global ecosystem services[J]. Resources Science, 2001, 23(6):5-9 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2001.06.002 |
| [4] | 邓舒洪.区域土地利用变化与生态系统服务价值动态变化研究[D].杭州: 浙江大学, 2012: 35-53 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10335-1012318163.htm DENG S H. Dynamic effects on ecosystem services value with regional landuse change[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2012: 35-53 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10335-1012318163.htm |
| [5] | 刘亚男, 李淑杰, 孙博, 等.扶余市生态服务价值对土地利用变化的响应[J].江苏农业学报, 2017, 33(3):592-597 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.03.016 LIU Y N, LI S J, SUN B, et al. Responses of ecosystem service value to land use change in Fuyu City, Jilin Province[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 33(3):592-597 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.03.016 |
| [6] | 周家艳, 田颖.基于生态系统服务功能价值评估的旅游度假区规划环评——以苏州太湖国家旅游度假区规划环评为例[J].水土保持通报, 2017, 37(4):310-314 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stbctb201704052 ZHOU J Y, TIAN Y. Application of ecosystem services evaluation in environmental impact assessment on tourism resort plan-a case study at Suzhou Taihu Lake National Tourism Resort[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 37(4):310-314 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stbctb201704052 |
| [7] | 王晓晴, 牛志君, 康薇, 等.基于土地生态要素分区的坝上生态用地生态服务价值分析[J].中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(6):903-915 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2018-0613&flag=1 WANG X Q, NIU Z J, KANG W, et al. Analysis of ecological service value of ecological land of Bashang area based on ecological factor division[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018, 26(6):903-915 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2018-0613&flag=1 |
| [8] | 肖玉, 谢高地, 安凯.莽措湖流域生态系统服务功能经济价值变化研究[J].应用生态学报, 2003, 14(5):676-680 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2003.05.006 XIAO Y, XIE G D, AN K. Economic value of ecosystem services in Mangcuo Lake drainage basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, 14(5):676-680 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2003.05.006 |
| [9] | 唐秀美, 陈百明, 路庆斌, 等.生态系统服务价值的生态区位修正方法——以北京市为例[J].生态学报, 2010, 30(13):3526-3535 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201013017 TANG X M, CHEN B M, LU Q B, et al. The ecological location correction of ecosystem service value:A case study of Beijing City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(13):3526-3535 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201013017 |
| [10] | 赖瑾瑾, 刘雪华, 靳强.顺义地区生态系统服务功能价值的时空变化[J].清华大学学报:自然科学版, 2008, 48(9):1466-1471 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qhdxxb200809022 LAI J J, LIU X H, JIN Q. Spatial-temporal changes of ecosystem services in the Shunyi District[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University:Science and Technology, 2008, 48(9):1466-1471 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qhdxxb200809022 |
| [11] | COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630):253-260 doi: 10.1038/387253a0 |
| [12] | 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5):911-915 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2008.05.019 XIE G D, ZHEN L, LU C X, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(5):911-915 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2008.05.019 |
| [13] | 李福夺, 尹昌斌.南方稻区绿肥生态服务功能及生态价值评估研究[J].中国生态农业学报, 2019, 27(2):327-336 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2019-0220&flag=1 LI F D, YIN C B. Assessment of the functions and ecological services values of green manure in paddy fields in South China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(2):327-336 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2019-0220&flag=1 |
| [14] | 李晓赛.县域尺度生态系统服务价值动态评估研究[D].保定: 河北农业大学, 2015: 37-46 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10086-1015392844.htm LI X S. Research on dynamic evaluation of ecosystem services value in county level[D]. Baoding: Agricultural University of Hebei, 2015: 37-46 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10086-1015392844.htm |
| [15] | 邓雪莉, 吴柏清.资阳市土地利用生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].技术与市场, 2014, 21(10):172-175 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8554.2014.10.120 DENG X L, WU B Q. Ecosystem services evaluation of Ziyang land use[J]. Technology and Market, 2014, 21(10):172-175 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8554.2014.10.120 |
| [16] | 郭娜, 刘剑秋.植物生物量研究概述(综述)[J].亚热带植物科学, 2011, 40(2):83-88 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2011.02.024 GUO N, LIU J Q. A review of research on plant biomass[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2011, 40(2):83-88 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2011.02.024 |
| [17] | 张宪洲.我国自然植被净第一性生产力的估算与分布[J].资源科学, 1993(1):15-21 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZY199301002.htm ZHANG X Z. Estimation and distribution of net primary productivity of natural vegetation in China[J]. Resources Science, 1993(1):15-21 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZY199301002.htm |
| [18] | 朱志辉.自然植被净第一性生产力估计模型[J].科学通报, 1993, 38(15):1422-1426 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.1993.15.019 ZHU Z H. A model for estimating net primary productivity of natural vegetation[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1993, 38(15):1422-1426 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.1993.15.019 |
| [19] | 王宗明, 梁银丽.植被净第一性生产力模型研究进展[J].西北林学院学报, 2002, 17(2):22-25 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2002.02.007 WANG Z M, LIANG Y L. Progress in vegetation net primary productivity model research[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2002, 17(2):22-25 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2002.02.007 |
| [20] | 陈阳, 张建军, 杜国明, 等.三江平原北部生态系统服务价值的时空演变[J].生态学报, 2015, 35(18):6157-6164 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201518027 CHEN Y, ZHANG J J, DU G M, et al. Temporal and spatial changes in ecosystem service values in the northern Sanjiang Plain[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(18):6157-6164 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201518027 |
| [21] | WILSON M A, CARPENTER S R. Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States:1971-1997[J]. Ecological Applications, 1999, 9(3):772-783 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246009948_Economic_Valuation_of_Freshwater_Ecosystem_Services_In_The_United_States_1971-1997 |
| [22] | 栾维新, 崔红艳.基于GIS的辽河三角洲潜在海平面上升淹没损失评估[J].地理研究, 2004, 23(6):805-814 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2004.06.011 LUAN W X, CUI H Y. Submerged loss assessment of potential sea-level rise of Liao river delta region based on GIS[J]. Geographical Research, 2004, 23(6):805-814 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2004.06.011 |
| [23] | 肖杨, 毛显强, 袁达, 等.水环境退化经济损失的计量方法及其应用[J].环境科学研究, 2006, 19(6):127-130 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-6929.2006.06.025 XIAO Y, MAO X Q, YUAN D, et al. An econometric model for water environmental degradation loss and its application[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2006, 19(6):127-130 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-6929.2006.06.025 |
| [24] | 部金凤.中外生态价值发展阶段系数的理论探讨及对比研究[D].北京: 北京工商大学, 2006: 7-12 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10011-2007178711.htm BU J F. Study on domestic and abroad development stage coefficient of the ecological value[D]. Beijing: Beijing Technology and Business University, 2006: 7-12 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10011-2007178711.htm |
| [25] | 郭青霞, 陈焕伟, 周欣.大同市南郊区土地利用生态服务价值空间分布及变化[J].中国生态农业学报, 2007, 15(5):188-192 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2007547&flag=1 GUO Q X, CHEN H W, ZHOU X. Spatial distribution and changes of ecological service value of land use in the southern suburb of Datong City[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2007, 15(5):188-192 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2007547&flag=1 |
