赵经华,,
马英杰,
洪明
新疆农业大学水利与土木工程学院 乌鲁木齐 830052
基金项目: 新疆教育厅创新项目XJEDU2017T004
中国农业大学-新疆农业大学联合基金项目2015TC051
详细信息
作者简介:郑明, 主要从事节水灌溉技术研究。E-mail:xjzhengming@126.com
通讯作者:赵经华, 主要从事节水灌溉技术研究及教学工作。E-mail:zhaojinghua_xj@126.com
中图分类号:S715.4计量
文章访问数:602
HTML全文浏览量:5
PDF下载量:540
被引次数:0
出版历程
收稿日期:2018-11-08
录用日期:2018-12-26
刊出日期:2019-05-01
Applicability of Partial Root-zone Irrigation model to simulate evapotranspiration and transpiration in drip irrigation jujube orchards in southern Xinjiang
ZHENG Ming,ZHAO Jinghua,,
MA Yingjie,
HONG Ming
College of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
Funds: This study was supported by the Innovation Project of Xinjiang Education DepartmentXJEDU2017T004
China Agricultural University-Xinjiang Agricultural University Joint Fund Project2015TC051
More Information
Corresponding author:E-mail:zhaojinghua_xj@126.com
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要
摘要:为构建适用于模拟南疆滴灌成龄枣园蒸散及其组成成分的模型,了解枣园土壤蒸发特征,本研究在双源模型和局部湿润灌溉方式下稀疏植被蒸散估算模型基础之上构建滴灌枣园局部湿润模型,以涡度相关法实测2017年枣园蒸散数据,对双源模型(Shuttleworth-Wallace)及滴灌枣园局部湿润模型(Partial Root-zone Irrigation model)系数进行拟合;之后通过评价两种模型模拟值的可靠性以及增加和减少模型参数10%来观测模型各参数对蒸散的影响方式,并校验各模型参数计算公式的准确性;然后以涡度相关法与液流法实测的2018年枣园蒸散与蒸腾量为基准值,对双源模型与滴灌枣园局部湿润模型模拟2018年枣园蒸散及蒸腾量的可靠性进行评价,筛选出适合模拟南疆滴灌枣园蒸散及其组分的模型并模拟滴灌枣园土壤蒸发特征。结果表明:滴灌枣园局部湿润模型和双源模型的模型系数拟合准确;依据模型模拟评价标准,两种模型模拟2018年枣园蒸散的结果均为极好,且精度基本一致。滴灌枣园局部湿润模型模拟蒸腾量结果良好,与实际测定值之间的差值为15.73 mm;双源模型模拟蒸腾量结果不可取。因此筛选出滴灌枣园局部湿润模型模拟枣园土壤蒸发,枣园土壤蒸发量占蒸散量的19.74%。滴灌枣园局部湿润模型可以准确估算滴灌成龄枣园蒸散及蒸散组成成分。
关键词:枣园/
蒸散/
蒸腾/
局部湿润模型/
双源模型/
土壤蒸发
Abstract:Constructing a model suitable for simulating evapotranspiration and evapotranspiration components of mature jujube orchard under drip irrigation in southern Xinjiang and understanding their soil evaporation characteristics would be beneficial for growers. Based on the Shuttleworth-Wallace model and the evapotranspiration estimation model of sparse vegetation under local wet irrigation, a Partial Root-zone Irrigation model of drip irrigation for the jujube orchard was constructed. The evapotranspiration data were measured by eddy correlation methods in the jujube orchard in 2017, and the coefficients of the Shuttleworth-Wallace model and the Partial Root-zone Irrigation model of drip irrigation for jujube orchard were fitted and evaluated; the effects of the model parameters on evapotranspiration were observed by increasing and decreasing the model parameters by 10%, and the accuracy of the formulas for calculating the parameters of each model was verified. Evapotranspiration was then measured using the eddy correlation method and transpiration was measured using the liquid flow method to obtain accurate values. The reliability of the two models used to simulate evapotranspiration and transpiration in jujube orchard in 2018 were evaluated. The models were suitable for calculating evapotranspiration and evapotranspiration components in the drip irrigation jujube orchard of southern Xinjiang in 2018, as well as simulating the soil evaporation characteristics. Model coefficients of the Shuttleworth-Wallace model and Partial Root-zone Irrigation model for the drip irrigation jujube orchard were accurately fitted according to the criteria for evaluating the simulation results of the model. The results of the two models for simulating evapotranspiration were excellent for the jujube orchard in 2018, and the accuracy of the two models were the same. The results of the Partial Root-zone Irrigation model for drip irrigation jujube orchard were also good, with a difference of 15.73 mm between the model and actual measured value. It was not advisable to simulate transpiration by using the Shuttleworth-Wallace model. Therefore, the Partial Root-zone Irrigation model for drip irrigation was selected to simulate soil evaporation in the jujube orchard, and the results showed that soil evaporation accounted for 19.74% of the evapotranspiration. Thus, the Partial Root-zone Irrigation model for the drip irrigation jujube orchards can be used to accurately estimate the evapotranspiration and evapotranspiration components of the orchards.
Key words:Jujube orchard/
Evapotranspiration/
Transpiration/
Partial Root-zone Irrigation model/
Shuttleworth-Wallace model/
Soil evaporation
HTML全文

图1SW模型、滴灌枣园PRI-ET模型和EC计算2017年滴灌枣园蒸散量对比
Figure1.Comparisons of evapotranspiration simulated by Shuttleworth-Wallace model and Partial Root-zone Irrigation model and measured by eddy correlation method in drip irrigated jujube orchard in 2017


图22018年枣园ET日实测值与两种模型模拟值
Figure2.Measured daily evapotranspiration and simulated values with Partial Root-zone Irrigation model and Shuttleworth-Wallace model in drip irrigated jujube orchard in 2018


图32018年枣园ET日实测值与滴灌枣园PRI-ET(a)和SW模型(b)模拟值的线性回归分析
Figure3.Linear regression analysis between measured daily values of evapotranspiration and simulated values with Partial Root-zone Irrigation model (a) and Shuttleworth-Wallace model (b) in jujube orchard in 2018


图42018年枣园蒸腾量日实测值与两种模型模拟值
Figure4.Measured daily values of transpiration and simulated values with Partial Root-zone Irrigation model (a) and Shuttleworth-Wallace model (b) in jujube orchard in 2018


图52018年枣园蒸腾量日实测值与滴灌枣园PRI-ET(a)和SW模型(b)模拟值线性回归分析
Figure5.Linear regression analysis between measured daily values of transpiration and simulated values with Partial Root-zone Irrigation model (a) and Shuttleworth-Wallace model (b) in jujube orchard in 2018


图6滴灌枣园PRI-ET模型估算的枣园日土壤蒸发强度及日土壤蒸发比变化特征
Figure6.Features of soil evaporation and daily soil evaporation ratio in jujube orchard simulated by Partial Root-zone Irrigation model

表1试验枣园土壤剖面基本物理性状
Table1.Basic physical properties of soil profile of the tested jujube orchard
土层 Soil layer (cm) | 土壤容重 Soil bulk density (g·cm-3) | 田间持水率 Field capacity (%) | > 0.05 mm砂粒含量 Sand(> 0.05 mm) content (%) | 0.002~0.05 mm粉(砂)含量 Silt (0.002~0.05 mm) content (%) | < 0.002 mm黏粒含量 Clay(< 0.002 mm) content (%) | 土壤质地 Soil texture |
0~10 | 1.57 | 4.73 | 95.8 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 细砂 Fine sand |
10~20 | 1.61 | 5.67 | 95.2 | 4.1 | 0.7 | 细砂 Fine sand |
20~30 | 1.57 | 4.91 | 95.5 | 3.9 | 0.6 | 细砂 Fine sand |
30~40 | 1.63 | 4.89 | 95.9 | 3.5 | 0.6 | 细砂 Fine sand |
40~50 | 1.59 | 3.57 | 96.4 | 3.1 | 0.5 | 细砂 Fine sand |
50~60 | 1.65 | 3.34 | 95.9 | 3.5 | 0.6 | 细砂 Fine sand |
60~70 | 1.64 | 4.45 | 94.5 | 4.7 | 0.8 | 细砂 Fine sand |
70~80 | 1.68 | 5.25 | 91.5 | 7.4 | 1.1 | 细砂 Fine sand |
80~90 | 1.63 | 15.48 | 80.8 | 16.2 | 3.0 | 壤质砂土 Loam sandy soil |
90~100 | 1.66 | 30.74 | 42.7 | 45.6 | 11.7 | 壤土 Loam |

表2滴灌枣园PRI-ET模型和SW模型模拟ET及其组分对参数变化±10%的敏感性
Table2.Sensitivities of evapotranspiration and its components to parameters variations of ±10% in Partial Root-zone Irrigation model and Shuttleworth-Wallace model
% | |||||
模型 Model | 参数 Parameter | 参数变化量 Change rate of parameter | 蒸散量变化率 Change rate of evapotranspiration | 蒸腾量 Change rate of transpiration | 蒸发量 Change rate of evaporation |
PRI-ET模型 Partial Root-zone Irrigation model | raa | 10 | 0.72 | 0.54 | 1.48 |
-10 | -0.74 | -0.56 | -1.50 | ||
rap | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
-10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
rsp | 10 | -5.61 | -6.99 | 0 | |
-10 | 6.55 | 8.15 | 0 | ||
racws=racds | 10 | -0.09 | 0 | -0.45 | |
-10 | 0.10 | 0 | 0.51 | ||
rscws | 10 | -0.61 | 0 | -3.26 | |
-10 | 0.70 | 0 | 3.50 | ||
rscds | 10 | -0.70 | 0 | -3.52 | |
-10 | 0.82 | 0 | 4.12 | ||
LAI | 10 | 3.61 | 4.98 | -1.97 | |
-10 | -5.79 | -7.78 | 2.31 | ||
SW模型 Shuttleworth- Wallace model | raa | 10 | 0.12 | 0.36 | -0.33 |
-10 | -0.12 | -0.38 | 0.36 | ||
rap | 10 | -0.02 | -0.06 | 0.06 | |
-10 | 0.02 | 0.06 | -0.06 | ||
rsp | 10 | -4.35 | -7.34 | 1.30 | |
-10 | 5.11 | 8.62 | -1.53 | ||
ras | 10 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.19 | |
-10 | -0.18 | -0.18 | -0.18 | ||
rss | 10 | -1.86 | 0.34 | -5.98 | |
-10 | 2.13 | -0.38 | 6.83 | ||
LAI | 10 | 4.61 | 7.78 | -1.39 | |
-10 | -4.79 | -8.08 | 1.43 |

参考文献
[1] | XU C Y, SINGH V P. Evaluation of three complementary relationship evapotranspiration models by water balance approach to estimate actual regional evapotranspiration in different climatic regions[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2005, 308(1/4):105-121 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=b4e698079effb114e740bad1cf12d4e7 |
[2] | 张宝忠, 许迪, 刘钰, 等.多尺度蒸散发估测与时空尺度拓展方法研究进展[J].农业工程学报, 2015, 31(6):8-16 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nygcxb201506002 ZHANG B Z, XU D, LIU Y, et al. Review of multi-scale evapotranspiration estimation and spatio-temporal scale expansion[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2015, 31(6):8-16 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nygcxb201506002 |
[3] | RANA G, KATERJI N. Measurement and estimation of actual evapotranspiration in the field under Mediterranean climate:A review[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2000, 13(2/3):125-153 doi: 10.1016-S1161-0301(00)00070-8/ |
[4] | 石小虎, 蔡焕杰, 赵丽丽, 等.基于SIMDualKc模型估算非充分灌水条件下温室番茄蒸发蒸腾量[J].农业工程学报, 2015, 31(22):131-138 doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.22.018 SHI X H, CAI H J, ZHAO L L, et al. Estimation of greenhouse tomato evapotranspiration under deficit irrigation based on SIMDualKc model[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2015, 31(22):131-138 doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.22.018 |
[5] | 刘海军, 黄冠华, TANNY J, 等.用涡度相关法测定网室内香蕉树蒸散量[J].农业工程学报, 2008, 24(9):1-5 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2008.09.001 LIU H J, HUANG G H, TANNY J, et al. Measurement of banana tree evapotranspiration in screen house using eddy covariance method[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2008, 24(9):1-5 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2008.09.001 |
[6] | MASSMAN W J, LEE X. Eddy covariance flux corrections and uncertainties in long-term studies of carbon and energy exchanges[J]. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 2002, 113(1):121-144 http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=b9a56f0fd3e5ce15171d988e202972b0&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn |
[7] | 王维真, 徐自为, 刘绍民, 等.黑河流域不同下垫面水热通量特征分析[J].地球科学进展, 2009, 24(07):714-723 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2009.07.004 WANG W Z, XU Z W, LIU S M, et al. The characteristics of heat and water vapor fluxes over different surfaces in the Heihe River Basin[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2009, 24(7):714-723 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2009.07.004 |
[8] | 黄辉, 孟平, 张劲松, 等.华北低丘山地人工林蒸散的控制因子[J].生态学报, 2014, 34(3):667-673 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201403017 HUANG H, MENG P, ZHANG J S, et al. Stomatal and environmental control on evapotranspiration in a plantation in the lower mountain areas of North China[J]. Aca Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(3):667-673 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201403017 |
[9] | 杨凡, 齐永青, 张玉翠, 等.大孔径闪烁仪与涡度相关系统对灌溉农田蒸散量的对比观测[J].中国生态农业学报, 2011, 19(5):1067-1071 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20110513&flag=1 YANG F, QI Y Q, ZHANG Y C, et al. Comparative advantages of large aperture Scintiilometer and Eddy Covariance instrument for measuring evapotranspiration in irrigated farmlands[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2011, 19(5):1067-1071 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20110513&flag=1 |
[10] | 屈艳萍, 康绍忠, 王素芬, 等.液流-株间微型蒸渗仪法测定新疆杨蒸发蒸腾量适用性分析[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2014, 32(3):88-94 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ghdqnyyj201403015 QU Y P, KANG S Z, WANG S F, et al. Applicability analysis for measuring evapotranspiration of Populus alba var. by sap flow and micro-lysimeter method[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2014, 32(3):88-94 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ghdqnyyj201403015 |
[11] | VILLARREAL-GUERRERO F, KACIRA M, FITZ-RODRíGUEZ E, et al. Comparison of three evapotranspiration models for a greenhouse cooling strategy with natural ventilation and variable high pressure fogging[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2012, 134:210-221 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.10.016 |
[12] | 朱仲元, 朝伦巴根, 王志强, 等.基于Shuttleworth-Wallace双源模型的天然杨树蒸散量日变化研究[J].水利学报, 2007, 38(5):582-590 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0559-9350.2007.05.011 ZHU Z Y, CHAO L B G, WANG Z Q, et al. Study on diurnal variation of Populus evapotranspiration based on Shuttleworth-Wallace model[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2007, 38(5):582-590 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0559-9350.2007.05.011 |
[13] | 杨雨亭, 尚松浩.双源蒸散发模型估算潜在蒸散发量的对比[J].农业工程学报, 2012, 28(24):85-91 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nygcxb201224015 YANG Y T, SHANG S H. Comparison of dual-source evapotranspiration models in estimating potential evaporation and transpiration[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2012, 28(24):85-91 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nygcxb201224015 |
[14] | 卫新东, 刘守阳, 陈滇豫, 等. Shuttleworth-Wallace模型模拟陕北枣林蒸散适用性分析[J].农业机械学报, 2015, 46(3):142-151 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nyjxxb201503020 WEI X D, LIU S Y, CHEN D Y, et al. Applicability of Shuttleworth-Wallace model for evapotranspiration estimation of jujube forests in loess hilly-gully region[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2015, 46(3):142-151 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nyjxxb201503020 |
[15] | ZHANG B Z, KANG S Z, LI F S, et al. Comparison of three evapotranspiration models to Bowen ratio-energy balance method for a vineyard in an arid desert region of northwest China[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2008, 148(10):1629-1640 doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.05.016 |
[16] | 张宝忠, 康绍忠, 刘钰.局部湿润灌溉方式下稀疏植被蒸散估算模型——以沟灌葡萄园为例[C]//现代节水高效农业与生态灌区建设.北京: 中国农业工程学会, 2010: 11 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=conference&id=8512653 ZHANG B Z, KANG S Z, LIU Y. Estimation model for evapotranspiration of sparse vegetation under partial wetting irrigation: A case study of vineyard in furrow irrigation[C]//Proceedings of the Modern Water-Saving and Efficient Agriculture and Ecological Irrigation Area Construction. Beijing: Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010: 11 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=conference&id=8512653 |
[17] | WILSON K, GOLDSTEIN A, FALGE E, et al. Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2002, 113(1/4):223-243 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/NSTLQK/NSTL_QKJJ0229230263/ |
[18] | BRISSON N, ITIER B, L'HOTEL J C, et al. Parameterisation of the Shuttleworth-Wallace model to estimate daily maximum transpiration for use in crop models[J]. Ecological Modelling, 1998, 107(2/3):159-169 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=3b5ecad50b20a46819ffcdb7e9ccbf83 |
[19] | 母艳梅, 李俊, 同小娟, 等.基于Penman-Monteith模型和Shuttleworth-Wallace模型对太行山南麓人工林蒸散的模拟[J].北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(11):35-44 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bjlydxxb201711005 MU Y M, LI J, TONG X J, et al. Evapotranspiration simulated by Penman-Monteith and Shuttleworth-Wallace models over a mixed plantation in the southern foot of the Taihang Mountain, northern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(11):35-44 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bjlydxxb201711005 |
[20] | SHUTTLEWORTH W J, WALLACE J S. Evaporation from sparse crops-an energy combination theory[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1985, 111(469):839-855 doi: 10.1002/qj.49711146910 |
[21] | ZHOU M C, ISHIDAIRA H, HAPUARACHCHI H P, et al. Estimating potential evapotranspiration using Shuttleworth-Wallace model and NOAA-AVHRR NDVI data to feed a distributed hydrological model over the Mekong River basin[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2006, 327(1/2):151-173 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=934cca5d0361c365516c0356c01bf7c8 |
[22] | JARVIS P G. The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 1976, 273(927):593-610 doi: 10.1098/rstb.1976.0035 |
[23] | HARRIS P P, HUNTINGFORD C, COX P M, et al. Effect of soil moisture on canopy conductance of Amazonian rainforest[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2004, 122(3/4):215-227 doi: 10.1016-j.agrformet.2003.09.006/ |
[24] | BRUTSAERT W. Evaporation into the Atmosphere:Theory, History and Applications[M]. Netherlands:Springer, 1982 |
[25] | KATO T, KIMURA R, KAMICHIKA M. Estimation of evapotranspiration, transpiration ratio and water-use efficiency from a sparse canopy using a compartment model[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2004, 65(3):173-191 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2003.10.001 |
[26] | 刘守阳.黄土丘陵沟壑区旱作山地枣林耗水规律研究[D].杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2013: 39-49 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10712-1013345439.htm LIU S Y. Law of rainfed jujube forest evapotranspiration in the loess hill and gully area[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2013: 39-49 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10712-1013345439.htm |
[27] | 高冠龙, 张小由, 鱼腾飞, 等. Shuttleworth-Wallace双源蒸散发模型阻力参数的确定[J].冰川冻土, 2016, 38(1):170-177 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BCDT201601019.htm GAO G L, ZHANG X Y, YU T F, et al. Calculation methods of resistances of the Shuttleworth-Wallace model[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2016, 38(1):170-177 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BCDT201601019.htm |
[28] | ROSA R D, PAREDES P, RODRIGUES G C, et al. Implementing the dual crop coefficient approach in interactive software:2. Model testing[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2012, 103:62-77 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.10.018 |
[29] | 王子申, 蔡焕杰, 虞连玉, 等.基于SIMDualKc模型估算西北旱区冬小麦蒸散量及土壤蒸发量[J].农业工程学报, 2016, 32(5):126-136 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nygcxb201605018 WANG Z S, CAI H J, YU L Y, et al. Estimation of evapotranspiration and soil evaporation of winter wheat in arid region of Northwest China based on SIMDualKc model[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(5):126-136 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nygcxb201605018 |
[30] | LI X Y, YANG P L, REN S M, et al. Modeling cherry orchard evapotranspiration based on an improved dual-source model[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 98(1):12-18 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.07.019 |
[31] | 吴林, 闵雷雷, 沈彦俊, 等.分时段修正双源模型在西北干旱区玉米蒸散量模拟中的应用[J].中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(5):634-646 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20170502&flag=1 WU L, MIN L L, SHEN Y J, et al. Simulation of maize evapotranspiration at different growth stages using revised dual-layered model in arid Northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(5):634-646 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20170502&flag=1 |
[32] | 李俊, 韩凤明, 同小娟, 等.麦田蒸散模型的改进及其对阻力参数的敏感性分析[J].中国农业气象, 2014, 35(6):635-643 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2014.06.005 LI J, HAN F M, TONG X J, et al. Evapotranspiration models for a winter wheat field:The improvements and analyses on their sensitivities to the resistance parameters[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2014, 35(6):635-643 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2014.06.005 |
[33] | 艾鹏睿, 马英杰, 马亮.干旱区滴灌枣棉间作模式下枣树棵间蒸发的变化规律[J].生态学报, 2018, 38(13):4761-4769 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201813021 AI P R, MA Y J, MA L. Study on evaporation variation of jujube trees under drip irrigation of jujube and cotton intercropping in an arid area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(13):4761-4769 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201813021 |
[34] | 王新, 刘洪波, 张江辉, 等.不同水分条件下干旱区葡萄园土面蒸发试验研究[J].土壤学报, 2012, 49(5):1050-1055 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trxb201205025 WANG X, LIU H B, ZHANG J H, et al. Experimental study on soil evaporation in vineyards different in soil moisture in arid region[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2012, 49(5):1050-1055 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trxb201205025 |