孔丽丽,
李前,
尹彩侠,
秦裕波,
于雷,
王立春,,
王蒙,
农业部东北植物营养与农业环境重点实验室/吉林省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所 长春 130033
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划2017YFD0300604
国际植物营养研究所(IPNI)项目NMBF-Jilin-2018
详细信息
作者简介:侯云鹏, 主要从事养分资源高效利用方面研究。E-mail:exceedfhvfha@163.com
通讯作者:王立春, 主要从事玉米栽培与土壤肥料研究, E-mail:wlc1960@163.com
王蒙, 主要从事高效施肥研究, E-mail:wangmeng0703@163.com
中图分类号:S513.062计量
文章访问数:797
HTML全文浏览量:3
PDF下载量:568
被引次数:0
出版历程
收稿日期:2018-01-22
录用日期:2018-04-28
刊出日期:2018-09-01
Effects of nitrogen fertilizer management on nitrogen absorption, utilization and soil inorganic nitrogen content under film mulch drip irrigation of maize
HOU Yunpeng,KONG Lili,
LI Qian,
YIN Caixia,
QIN Yubo,
YU Lei,
WANG Lichun,,
WANG Meng,
Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Agro-Environment in Northeast Region, Ministry of Agriculture/Agricultural Resources and Environment Research Institute, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130033, China
Funds: the National Key Research and Development Project of China2017YFD0300604
the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) ProjectNMBF-Jilin-2018
More Information
Corresponding author:WANG Lichun, E-mail: wlc1960@163.com;WANG Meng, E-mail: wangmeng0703@163.com
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要
摘要:为解决吉林省半干旱区覆膜滴灌条件下合理施氮问题,通过两年(2016-2017年)田间试验,研究了覆膜滴灌等氮量投入条件下,不同运筹模式(N1:100%基肥;N2:50%基肥+50%拔节肥;N3:30%基肥+50%拔节肥+10%大口肥+10%开花肥;N4:20%基肥+30%拔节肥+20%大口肥+20%开花肥+10%灌浆肥)对春玉米产量、氮素利用效率、关键生长节点氮素积累特征以及生育期内土壤无机氮含量变化和氮素平衡的影响。结果表明,分次施氮各处理(N2、N3、N4)玉米产量显著高于100%基肥处理(N1),其中N4处理玉米产量最高,较N1处理分别提高22.44%(2016年)和35.31%(2017年)。与N1处理相比,N2、N3、N4显著提高了玉米氮素吸收利用率、农学利用率和偏生产力,提高幅度依次为52.02%~83.21%、63.69%~120.78%、11.85%~22.46%(2016年)和92.44%~129.38%、127.23%~203.09%、22.10%~34.01%(2017年),且均以N4处理最高。施氮显著提高了玉米拔节期至成熟期氮积累量,其中开花期至成熟期氮积累量以N4处理最高。与N1处理相比,N2、N3、N4提高了玉米开花期至成熟期0~20 cm土壤无机氮含量,并降低成熟期40~100 cm土壤无机氮含量。土壤-作物系统氮素平衡中,N2、N3、N4处理较N1处理显著降低了氮素表观损失量,其中N4处理氮素表观损失量最低。综上所述,在本试验条件下,总施氮量210 kg·hm-2时,20%基肥+30%拔节肥+20%大口肥+20%开花肥+10%灌浆肥为该区域覆膜滴灌条件下氮肥最佳运筹模式。
关键词:春玉米/
氮肥运筹/
氮素利用效率/
土壤无机氮含量/
氮素平衡
Abstract:For reasonable application of nitrogen fertilizer under film mulch and drip irrigation in the semi-arid region of Jilin Province, a field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different nitrogen doses on spring maize yield, nitrogen utilization efficiency, nitrogen accumulation characteristics, soil inorganic nitrogen content and nitrogen balance during the growth period. The drip-irrigated film mulch experiment was conducted in 2016-2017 for N1 (100% basal fertilizer), N2 (50% basal fertilizer + 50% jointing fertilizer), N3 (30% basal fertilizer + 50% jointing fertilizer + 10% belling fertilizer + 10% flowering fertilizer) and N4 (20% basal fertilizer + 30% jointing fertilizer + 20% belling fertilizer + 20% flowering fertilizer + 10% filling fertilizer) nitrogen inputs. The results showed that grain yield under N2, N3 and N4 treatments were all significantly higher than that under N1 treatment. The highest maize yield was obtained under N4 treatment, increasing by 22.44% (2016) and 35.31% (2017) over that under N1 treatment. Absorption utilization efficiency, agronomic efficiency and partial factor productivity of nitrogen under N2, N3 and N4 treatments were all significantly higher than those under N1 treatment, respectively increasing in the ranges of 52.02%-83.21%, 63.69%-120.78%, 11.85%-22.46% (in 2016) and 92.44%-129.38%, 127.23%-203.09%, 22.10%-34.01% (in 2017). The highest increase was under N4 treatment. Nitrogen accumulation increased significantly with increasing nitrogen fertilizer application from jointing stage to mature stage, with the highest value under N4 treatment after flowering stage. Compared with N1 treatment, soil inorganic nitrogen content improved at the 0-20 cm soil layer under N2, N3 and N4 treatments after flowering stage, but dropped at the 40-100 cm soil layer at maturity stage. Nitrogen loss significantly reduced under N2, N3 and N4 treatments compared with that under N1 treatment, and it was lowest under N4 treatment in terms of nitrogen balance of the soil-crop system. In conclusion, optimum management strategy was obtained for 20% nitrogen base fertilizer, 30% dose at jointing stage, 20% at belling stage, 20% at flowering stage and 10% at filling stage. This gave a total nitrogen fertilizer application of 210 kg·hm-2 under the experimental field conditions.
Key words:Spring maize/
Nitrogen management/
Nitrogen utilization efficiency/
Soil inorganic nitrogen content/
Nitrogen balance
HTML全文
图12016-2017年试验区玉米生育期降雨量与平均气温
Figure1.Precipitation and average temperature during growing seasons of maize in 2016 and 2017 in the study area
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图2不同施氮处理下春玉米生长季0~20 cm土壤无机氮含量动态变化
N1: 100%基肥; N2: 50%基肥+50%拔节肥; N3: 30%基肥+50%拔节肥+10%大口肥+10%开花肥; N4: 20%基肥+30%拔节肥+20%大口肥+20%开花肥+10%灌浆肥。
Figure2.Dynamics of soil inorganic nitrogen contents in 0-20 cm soil during spring maize growing season under different nitrogen application treatments
N1: 100% basal fertilizer; N2: 50% basal fertilizer + 50% jointing fertilizer; N3: 30% basal fertilizer + 50% jointing fertilizer + 10% belling fertilizer + 10% flowering fertilizer; N4: 20% basal fertilizer + 30% jointing fertilizer + 20% belling fertilizer + 20% flowering fertilizer + 10% filling fertilizer.
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图3不同施氮处理下春玉米收获后0~100 cm土壤无机氮含量
N1: 100%基肥; N2: 50%基肥+50%拔节肥; N3: 30%基肥+50%拔节肥+10%大口肥+10%开花肥; N4: 20%基肥+30%拔节肥+20%大口肥+20%开花肥+10%灌浆肥。
Figure3.Soil inorganic nitrogen contents after spring maize harvest in 0-100 cm soil under different nitrogen application treatments
N1: 100% basal fertilizer; N2: 50% basal fertilizer + 50% jointing fertilizer; N3: 30% basal fertilizer + 50% jointing fertilizer + 10% belling fertilizer + 10% flowering fertilizer; N4: 20% basal fertilizer + 30% jointing fertilizer + 20% belling fertilizer + 20% flowering fertilizer + 10% filling fertilizer.
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
表1不同施氮处理下玉米产量及构成因素
Table1.Spring maize yields and yield components under different nitrogen application treatments
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) | 穗数 Ear number (plant·hm-2) | 穗粒数 Grains per ear | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight (g) | 收获指数 Harvest index (%) |
2016 | N0 | 8 239.00±241.63d | 72 333.33±577.35a | 451.60±3.52d | 274.80±3.40d | 49.71±1.65c |
N1 | 10 118.33±257.77c | 72 222.22±1 575.27a | 493.27±8.06c | 303.50±5.53c | 50.18±1.25bc | |
N2 | 11 316.33±233.69b | 72 444.44±1 170.63a | 514.80±6.72b | 318.73±3.97b | 51.92±0.66abc | |
N3 | 12 002.33±139.64a | 72 889.89±1 575.27a | 528.83±5.37a | 332.37±3.03ab | 52.59±1.47ab | |
N4 | 12 389.00±263.77a | 72 667.67±811.92a | 537.83±7.96a | 339.80±4.16a | 52.78±0.53a | |
2017 | N0 | 8 063.00±166.96e | 73 000.00±1 527.53a | 442.53±6.86e | 278.33±3.93e | 48.51±0.56d |
N1 | 9 760.00±211.63d | 72 111.11±1 170.63a | 471.40±4.30d | 295.57±3.13d | 49.43±0.95cd | |
N2 | 11 918.33±233.12c | 72 556.56± 838.87a | 530.37±3.26c | 326.83±5.13c | 51.07±0.89bc | |
N3 | 12 775.33±205.24b | 73 111.11±1 895.41a | 549.20±8.10b | 339.43±3.37b | 52.78±1.13ab | |
N4 | 13 206.00±122.01a | 72 778.78±838.87a | 565.57±3.10a | 353.70±5.06a | 53.47±1.03a | |
F值 | Y | 15.15** | 0.02 | 8.45* | 11.07** | 1.25 |
F-value | F | 407.46** | 1.92 | 293.20** | 293.85** | 13.93** |
Y × F | 8.53** | 0.05 | 17.44** | 5.98** | 0.53 | |
??N1: 100%基肥; N2: 50%基肥+50%拔节肥; N3: 30%基肥+50%拔节肥+10%大口肥+10%开花肥; N4: 20%基肥+30%拔节肥+20%大口肥+20%开花肥+10%灌浆肥。同列数据后不同字母表示在5%水平上差异显著。Y:年份; F:施肥处理; *和**分别表示在0.05和0.01水平差异显著。N1: 100% basal fertilizer; N2: 50% basal fertilizer + 50% jointing fertilizer; N3: 30% basal fertilizer + 50% jointing fertilizer + 10% belling fertilizer + 10% flowering fertilizer; N4: 20% basal fertilizer + 30% jointing fertilizer + 20% belling fertilizer + 20% flowering fertilizer + 10% filling fertilizer. Values followed by different letters in the same column are significantly different at 5% level. Y: year; F: fertilization treatment. * and ** mean significant differences at 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively. |
下载: 导出CSV
表2不同施氮处理下玉米氮素积累动态变化和氮素利用效率
Table2.Nutrient uptakes and fertilizer apparent utilization rates of spring maize under different nitrogen application treatments
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 氮积累量N accumulation (kg·hm-2) | 氮素吸收利用率 Nitrogen absorption utilization efficiency (%) | 氮素农学利用率 Nitrogen agronomic efficiency (kg·kg-1) | 氮素偏生产力 Nitrogen partial factor productivity (kg·kg-1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
苗期 Seedling | 拔节期 Jointing | 大口期 Belling | 开花期 Flowering | 灌浆期 Filling | 成熟期 Maturing | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | N0 | 3.13±0.21a | 32.04±3.00c | 70.45±1.60d | 102.01±3.08d | 116.17±3.24d | 118.35±3.39d | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N1 | 3.02±0.29a | 50.96±3.15a | 110.85±1.07a | 133.18±3.51c | 146.11±2.45c | 165.14±3.19c | 22.28±1.54c | 8.95±1.00c | 48.18±1.23c | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N2 | 3.15±0.10a | 47.29±4.37ab | 105.66±2.27b | 140.42±3.25b | 164.46±3.81b | 189.49±2.54b | 33.87±2.41b | 14.65±2.25b | 53.89±1.11b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N3 | 3.18±0.14a | 45.43±2.37ab | 102.57±2.73bc | 144.30±1.75ab | 172.80±3.93a | 198.88±1.64a | 38.35±0.83a | 17.92±0.49a | 57.15±0.66a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N4 | 3.13±0.13a | 43.82±2.33b | 101.22±2.16c | 146.76±2.37a | 176.73±2.52a | 204.08±3.71a | 40.82±3.30a | 19.76±2.27a | 59.00±1.26a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | N0 | 3.49±0.05a | 27.89±2.27c | 75.04±2.91d | 97.67±2.64d | 112.47±3.31d | 115.06±1.87d | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N1 | 3.72±0.11a | 52.27±2.98a | 113.75±3.12a | 132.29±3.03c | 143.11±2.39c | 157.58±4.22c | 20.25±1.12c | 8.08±0.57c | 46.48±1.01c | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N2 | 3.75±0.06a | 47.04±3.23ab | 109.34±3.72ab | 146.88±3.59b | 173.05±1.35b | 196.91±2.86b | 38.97±1.76b | 18.36±1.66b | 56.75±1.11b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N3 | 3.72±0.09a | 42.73±3.45b | 104.72±4.21b | 149.15±3.18ab | 179.13±2.54a | 208.05±3.40a | 44.28±1.70a | 22.44±1.20a | 60.83±0.98a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N4 | 3.70±0.11a | 42.08±2.35b | 99.33±3.86c | 152.40±2.51a | 180.62±3.15a | 212.60±2.18a | 46.45±1.72a | 24.49±1.29a | 62.29±0.58a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F值 F-value | Y | 142.17** | 2.08 | 5.52* | 6.51* | 5.98* | 6.22* | 32.72** | 15.20** | 17.16** | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F | 1.28 | 44.55** | 242.07** | 323.55** | 575.22** | 892.05** | 247.65** | 176.36** | 173.91** | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Y × F | 1.40 | 0.80 | 1.40 | 4.77* | 3.44* | 9.15** | 8.87** | 10.91** | 9.65** | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
??N1: 100%基肥; N2: 50%基肥+50%拔节肥; N3: 30%基肥+50%拔节肥+10%大口肥+10%开花肥; N4: 20%基肥+30%拔节肥+20%大口肥+20%开花肥+10%灌浆肥。同列数据后不同字母表示在5%水平上差异显著。Y:年份; F:施肥处理; *和**分别表示在0.05和0.01水平差异显著。N1: 100% basal fertilizer; N2: 50% basal fertilizer + 50% jointing fertilizer; N3: 30% basal fertilizer + 50% jointing fertilizer + 10% belling fertilizer + 10% flowering fertilizer; N4: 20% basal fertilizer + 30% jointing fertilizer + 20% belling fertilizer + 20% flowering fertilizer + 10% filling fertilizer. Values followed by different letters in the same column are significantly different at 5% level. Y: year; F: fertilization treatment. * and ** mean significant differences at 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively. |
下载: 导出CSV
表3不同施氮处理下0~100 cm剖面土壤氮素表观平衡
Table3.Nitrogen balance of 0-100 cm soil profile under different nitrogen application treatments
kg·hm-2 | ||||||||
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 氮素输入Nitrogen input | 氮素输出Nitrogen output | |||||
施氮量 N fertilizer | 起始无机氮 Initial inorganic N | 净矿化 Mineralization | 作物携出 Crop uptake | 残留无机氮 Residual inorganic N | 氮表观损失 Apparent N loss | |||
2016 | N0 | 0 | 119.30±2.31 | 67.24±3.86 | 118.35±3.39d | 68.19±3.08c | 0 | |
N1 | 210.00 | 119.30±2.31 | 67.24±3.86 | 165.14±3.19c | 112.99±4.41b | 118.41±7.31a | ||
N2 | 210.00 | 119.30±2.31 | 67.24±3.86 | 189.49±2.54b | 116.78±3.62ab | 90.27±4.95b | ||
N3 | 210.00 | 119.30±2.31 | 67.24±3.86 | 198.88±1.64a | 120.19±2.85ab | 77.47±3.18c | ||
N4 | 210.00 | 119.30±2.31 | 67.24±3.86 | 204.08±3.71a | 123.87±4.63a | 68.59±3.40d | ||
2017 | N0 | 0 | 116.06±1.92 | 57.57±3.20 | 115.06±1.87d | 58.57±4.91c | 0 | |
N1 | 210.00 | 116.06±1.92 | 57.57±3.20 | 157.58±4.22c | 101.63±4.58b | 124.42±7.25a | ||
N2 | 210.00 | 116.06±1.92 | 57.57±3.20 | 196.91±2.86b | 109.16±2.84ab | 77.56±4.57b | ||
N3 | 210.00 | 116.06±1.92 | 57.57±3.20 | 208.05±3.40a | 114.39±7.95a | 61.19±2.24c | ||
N4 | 210.00 | 116.06±1.92 | 57.57±3.20 | 212.60±2.18a | 117.42±4.97a | 53.61±3.13d | ||
F值 F-value | Y | - | - | - | 6.22* | 22.13** | 13.53* | |
F | - | - | - | 892.05** | 145.62** | 107.28** | ||
Y × F | - | - | - | 9.15** | 3.89* | 4.09* | ||
??N1: 100%基肥; N2: 50%基肥+50%拔节肥; N3: 30%基肥+50%拔节肥+10%大口肥+10%开花肥; N4: 20%基肥+30%拔节肥+20%大口肥+20%开花肥+10%灌浆肥。同列数据后不同字母表示在5%水平上差异显著。Y:年份; F:施肥处理; *和**分别表示在0.05和0.01水平差异显著。N1: 100% basal fertilizer; N2: 50% basal fertilizer + 50% jointing fertilizer; N3: 30% basal fertilizer + 50% jointing fertilizer + 10% belling fertilizer + 10% flowering fertilizer; N4: 20% basal fertilizer + 30% jointing fertilizer + 20% belling fertilizer + 20% flowering fertilizer + 10% filling fertilizer. Values followed by different letters in the same column are significantly different at 5% level. Y: year; F: fertilization treatment. * and ** mean significant differences at 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively. |
下载: 导出CSV
参考文献
[1] | 中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴2016[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2016:10 National Bureau of Statistics of People's Republic of China. China Statistical Yearbook 2016[M]. Beijing:China Statistics Press, 2016:10 |
[2] | 赵炳南, 朱风文, 杨威, 等.吉林省西部半干旱区玉米灌溉现状分析及对策[J].吉林农业科学, 2010, 35(6):8-10 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8701.2010.06.004 ZHAO B N, ZHU F W, YANG W, et al. Current status and strategies of maize irrigation in semi-arid area of western Jilin Province[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 35(6):8-10 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8701.2010.06.004 |
[3] | 曹玉军, 魏雯雯, 徐国安, 等.半干旱区不同地膜覆盖滴灌对土壤水、温变化及玉米生长的影响[J].玉米科学, 2013, 21(1):107-113 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2013.01.020 CAO Y J, WEI W W, XU G A, et al. Effects of different films on soil water, temperature and corn growth characteristics under drip-irrigation conditions in semi-arid region[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2013, 21(1):107-113 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2013.01.020 |
[4] | 徐泰森, 孙扬, 刘彦萱, 等.膜下滴灌水肥耦合对半干旱区玉米生长发育及产量的影响[J].玉米科学, 2016, 24(5):118-122 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QKC20162016102700117602 XU T S, SUN Y, LIU Y X, et al. Effects of combinations of water and nitrogen on growth and yield of drip irrigation under plastic film mulching maize in western Jilin Province[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2016, 24(5):118-122 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QKC20162016102700117602 |
[5] | 孙云云, 高玉山, 窦金刚, 等.半干旱区玉米降解地膜覆盖栽培综合效应研究[J].中国农学通报, 2011, 27(30):27-31 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgnxtb201130006 SUN Y Y, GAO Y S, DOU J G, et al. Comprehensive effects of degradable plastic film mulching cultivation for maize in semi-arid region[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(30):27-31 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgnxtb201130006 |
[6] | 王蒙. 吉林半干旱区春玉米膜下滴灌条件下水肥高效利用研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2017. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10019-1017164458.htm WANG M. Strategies for achieving high irrigation and fertilization efficiency for spring maize under mulched drip irrigation in semi arid area of Jilin Province[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2017 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10019-1017164458.htm |
[7] | 朱金龙, 危常州, 朱齐超, 等.膜下滴灌春玉米氮素吸收规律与增产效应[J].玉米科学, 2014, 22(6):121-125 http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=ymkx201406022&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ ZHU J L, WEI C Z, ZHU Q C, et al. Effect of N absorption and yield enhancement on spring maize under drip irrigation and film mulch[J]. Journal of Jilin Maize Sciences, 2014, 22(6):121-125 http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=ymkx201406022&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ |
[8] | 黄兴法, 赵楠, 任夏楠, 等.宁夏引黄灌区膜下滴灌春玉米适宜施肥量试验研究[J].灌溉排水学报, 2015, 34(12):28-31 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ggps201512007 HUANG X F, ZHAO N, REN X N, et al. Experimental research on fertilizer requirement of spring maize under drip irrigation in Ningxia Irrigation Area[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2015, 34(12):28-31 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ggps201512007 |
[9] | HOU Z N, LI P F, LI B G, et al. Effects of fertigation scheme on N uptake and N use efficiency in cotton[J]. Plant and Soil, 2007, 290(1/2):115-126 doi: 10.1007-s11104-006-9140-1/ |
[10] | WANG M, WANG L C, CUI Z L, et al. Closing the yield gap and achieving high N use efficiency and low apparent N losses[J]. Field Crops Research, 2017, 209:39-46 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.03.016 |
[11] | LI J S, ZHANG J J, RAO M J. Wetting patterns and nitrogen distributions as affected by fertigation strategies from a surface point source[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2004, 67(2):89-104 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2004.02.002 |
[12] | 李青军, 张炎, 胡伟, 等.氮素运筹对玉米干物质积累、氮素吸收分配及产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(3):755-760 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwyyyflxb201103033 LI Q J, ZHANG Y, HU W, et al. Effects of nitrogen management on maize dry matter accumulation, nitrogen uptake and distribution and maize yield[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2011, 17(3):755-760 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwyyyflxb201103033 |
[13] | 陈天宇, 杨克军, 李佐同, 等.松嫩平原西部膜下滴灌种植方式下氮肥追施对玉米产量和氮素积累的影响[J].玉米科学, 2016, 24(5):105-111 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QKC20162016102700133392 CHEN T Y, YANG K J, LI Z T, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer top dressing frequency and amount on grain yield and nitrogen accumulation under mulch film drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2016, 24(5):105-111 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QKC20162016102700133392 |
[14] | 张凌一, 李波, 魏新光, 等.辽宁棕壤土区不同滴灌施氮模式对玉米光合特性、产量及品质的影响[J].灌溉排水学报, 2017, 36(3):26-31 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ggps201703005 ZHANG L Y, LI B, WEI X G, et al. Impact of different nitrogen modes on maize photosynthetic characteristics, yield and quality under drip fertilization in Liaoning brown soil regions[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2017, 36(3):26-31 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ggps201703005 |
[15] | 刘慧迪, 杨克军, 李佐同, 等.松嫩平原西部膜下滴灌玉米基于叶龄指数的适宜追氮量研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(3):811-820 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwyyyflxb201603027 LIU H D, YANG K J, LI Z T, et al. Suitable amount of N topdressing based on leaf age index of maize using mulched drip irrigation technology in Western Songnen Plain[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(3):811-820 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwyyyflxb201603027 |
[16] | 侯云鹏, 孔丽丽, 李前, 等.滴灌施氮对春玉米氮素吸收、土壤无机氮含量及氮素平衡的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2018, 32(1):238-245 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqsystbcxb201801037 HOU Y P, KONG L L, LI Q, et al. Effects of drip irrigation with nitrogen on nitrogen uptake, soil inorganic nitrogen content and nitrogen balance of spring maize[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 32(1):238-245 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqsystbcxb201801037 |
[17] | 梁熠, 马琨, 朱海燕, 等.深松与施氮量对春玉米产量及氮素吸收利用率的影响[J].玉米科学, 2014, 22(2):129-134 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2014.02.025 LIANG Y, MA K, ZHU H Y, et al. Effect of subsoiling strategies and nitrogen application on the nitrogen utilization efficiency and grain yield of spring maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2014, 22(2):129-134 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2014.02.025 |
[18] | 侯云鹏, 韩立国, 孔丽丽, 等.不同施氮水平下水稻的养分吸收、转运及土壤氮素平衡[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(4):836-845 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwyyyflxb201504002 HOU Y P, HAN L G, KONG L L, et al. Nutrient absorption, translocation in rice and soil nitrogen equilibrium under different nitrogen application doses[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(4):836-845 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwyyyflxb201504002 |
[19] | 曹胜彪, 张吉旺, 董树亭, 等.施氮量和种植密度对高产夏玉米产量和氮素利用效率的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(6):1343-1353 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK201205759886 CAO S B, ZHANG J W, DONG S T, et al. Effects of nitrogen rate and planting density on grain yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of high yield summer maize[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2012, 18(6):1343-1353 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK201205759886 |
[20] | CHEN Y L, XIAO C X, WU D L, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on grain yield and grain nitrogen concentration in two maize hybrids with contrasting nitrogen remobilization efficiency[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2015, 62:79-89 doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2014.09.008 |
[21] | 葛均筑, 徐莹, 袁国印, 等.覆膜对长江中游春玉米氮肥利用效率及土壤速效氮素的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(2):296-305 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwyyyflxb201602002 GE J Z, XU Y, YUAN G Y, et al. Effects of film mulching on nitrogen use efficiency of spring maize and soil available nitrogen variations in the middle reaches of Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(2):296-305 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwyyyflxb201602002 |
[22] | 王云奇, 陶洪斌, 王璞, 等.施氮模式对夏玉米产量和籽粒灌浆的影响[J].中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(12):1594-1598 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20121205&flag=1 WANG Y Q, TAO H B, WANG P, et al. Effect of nitrogen application patterns on yield and grain-filling of summer maize[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(12):1594-1598 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20121205&flag=1 |
[23] | 王玉雯, 郭九信, 孔亚丽, 等.氮肥优化管理协同实现水稻高产和氮肥高效[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(5):1157-1166 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwyyyflxb201605002 WANG Y W, GUO J X, KONG Y L, et al. Nitrogen optimize management achieves high grain yield and enhances nitrogen use efficiency of rice[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(5):1157-1166 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwyyyflxb201605002 |
[24] | NAKANO H, MORITA S, KITAGAWA H, et al. Grain yield response to planting density in forage rice with a large number of spikelets[J]. Crop Science, 2011, 52(1):345-350 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=JJ0225403458 |
[25] | 李朝苏, 汤永禄, 吴春, 等.施氮量对四川盆地小麦生长及灌浆的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(4):873-883 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwyyyflxb201504006 LI C S, TANG Y L, WU C, et al. Effect of N rate on growth and grain filling of wheat in Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(4):873-883 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwyyyflxb201504006 |
[26] | 吴迪, 黄绍文, 金继运.氮肥运筹、配施有机肥和坐水种对春玉米产量与养分吸收转运的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(2):317-326 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2009.02.011 WU D, HUANG S W, JIN J Y. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer management, organic manure application and bed-irrigation sowing on maize yield, and nutrient uptake and translocation[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2009, 15(2):317-326 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2009.02.011 |
[27] | 马兴华, 梁晓芳, 刘光亮, 等.氮肥用量及其基追施比例对烤烟氮素利用的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(6):1655-1664 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwyyyflxb201606024 MA X H, LIANG X F, LIU G L, et al. Effect of nitrogen application rate and base and topdressing ratio on nitrogen utilization of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(6):1655-1664 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwyyyflxb201606024 |
[28] | 姜涛.氮肥运筹对夏玉米产量、品质及植株养分含量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(3):559-565 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwyyyflxb201303005 JIANG T. Effects of nitrogen application regime on yield, quality and plant nutrient contents of summer maize[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2013, 19(3):559-565 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwyyyflxb201303005 |
[29] | 马冬云, 郭天财, 王晨阳, 等.施氮量对冬小麦灌浆期光合产物积累、转运及分配的影响[J].作物学报, 2008, 34(6):1027-1033 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2008.06.016 MA D Y, GUO T C, WANG C Y, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rates on accumulation, translocation, and partitioning of photosynthate in winter wheat at grain filling stage[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(6):1027-1033 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2008.06.016 |
[30] | KICHEY T, HIREL B, HEUMEZ E, et al. In winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), post-anthesis nitrogen uptake and remobilisation to the grain correlates with agronomic traits and nitrogen physiological markers[J]. Field Crops Research, 2007, 102(1):22-32 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.01.002 |
[31] | 王宜伦, 李潮海, 谭金芳, 等.氮肥后移对超高产夏玉米产量及氮素吸收和利用的影响[J].作物学报, 2011, 37(2):339-347 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2011.02.031 WANG Y L, LI C H, TAN J F, et al. Effect of postponing N application on yield, nitrogen absorption and utilization in super-high-yield summer maize[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(2):339-347 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2011.02.031 |
[32] | 姜涛, 李玮.氮肥运筹对夏玉米氮素利用及土壤无机氮时空变异的影响[J].玉米科学, 2013, 21(6):101-106 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2013.06.022 JIANG T, LI W. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on nitrogen utilization and spatial-temporal distributions of soil inorganic nitrogen in summer maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2013, 21(6):101-106 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2013.06.022 |
[33] | 石玉, 于振文.施氮量及底追比例对小麦产量、土壤硝态氮含量和氮平衡的影响[J].生态学报, 2006, 26(11):3661-3669 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2006.11.019 SHI Y, YU Z W. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer rate and ration of base and topdressing on yield of wheat, content of soil nitrate and nitrogen balance[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(11):3661-3669 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2006.11.019 |
[34] | 武际, 郭熙盛, 杨晓虎, 等.氮肥施用时期及基追比例对土壤矿质氮含量时空变化及小麦产量和品质的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2008, 19(11):2382-2387 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb200811010 WU J, GUO X S, YANG X H, et al. Effects of application time and basal/topdressing ratio of nitrogen fertilizer on the spatiotemporal variation of soil NO3--N and NH4+-N contents and the grain yield and its quality of wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(11):2382-2387 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb200811010 |
[35] | 夏晓亮, 石祖梁, 荆奇, 等.氮肥运筹对稻茬小麦土壤硝态氮含量时空分布和氮素利用的影响[J].土壤学报, 2010, 47(3):490-496 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trxb201003014 XIA X L, SHI Z L, JING Q, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on spatial-temporal distributions of soil nitrate and nitrogen utilization in wheat season of rice-wheat systems[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2010, 47(3):490-496 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trxb201003014 |
[36] | 巨晓棠, 刘学军, 邹国元, 等.冬小麦/夏玉米轮作体系中氮素的损失途径分析[J].中国农业科学, 2002, 35(12):1493-1499 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2002.12.011 JU X T, LIU X J, ZOU G Y, et al. Evaluation of nitrogen loss way in winter wheat and summer maize rotation system[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2002, 35(12):1493-1499 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2002.12.011 |
[37] | 栗丽, 洪坚平, 王宏庭, 等.施氮与灌水对夏玉米土壤硝态氮积累、氮素平衡及其利用率的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(6):1358-1365 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwyyyflxb201006009 LI L, HONG J P, WANG H T, et al. Effects of nitrogen application and irrigation on soil nitrate accumulation, nitrogen balance and use efficiency in summer maize[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2010, 16(6):1358-1365 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwyyyflxb201006009 |
[38] | LI X D, MASUDA H, KOBA K, et al. Nitrogen isotope study on nitrate-contaminated groundwater in the Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2007, 178(1/4):145-156 doi: 10.1007-s11270-006-9186-y/ |
[39] | 邹晓锦, 张鑫, 安景文.氮肥减量后移对玉米产量和氮素吸收利用及农田氮素平衡的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2011, (6):25-29 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6257.2011.06.004 ZOU X J, ZHANG X, AN J W. Effect of reducing and postponing of N application on yield, plant N uptake, utilization and N balance in maize[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2011, (6):25-29 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6257.2011.06.004 |