载人航天法律制度:挑战与完善
Legal System of Manned Space Flight: Challenges and Improvement 宣增益; 1:中国政法大学 摘要(Abstract)：

自1961年前苏联宇航员加加林飞往太空已逾半个多世纪,而商业载人航天产业也在近年悄然兴起,这给载人航天法律制度带来了挑战。从国内法角度,这些挑战包括我国载人航天体制改革问题、载人航天产业管理立法问题、私人商业载人航天运营商的责任问题以及国内法与国际条约的协调问题等;从国际法层面,这些挑战包括太空的私人财产权问题、太空的开发利用问题以及现行有效的几大太空公约的完善问题等。因此,为进一步促进载人航天产业的发展,我们应直面这些问题,尽快完善载人航天法律制度。

关键词(KeyWords)： 载人航天;;国内法;;国际法;;挑战;;完善

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 宣增益;

Email:


参考文献(References)： [1]蔡高强、高阳、李成:“论载人航天国际法律制度的完善”,载于《北京理工大学学报》第13卷第3期。[2]赵相林主编:《国际私法》(第二版),中国政法大学出版社2010年版。1http://baike.haosou.com/doc/5932531-6145461.html;http://baike.haosou.com/doc/6880568-7098044.html last visted on March 18,2015.2http://baike.baidu.com/link?url=UMJMd CNdiu Lqyvo4g1-b AHb5MTyw XsI zW hxY Ib QFseV xlX n DFiT 3b FzRu Fd Ln EEvRtq TXP1VACGC55w0cjE 6a last visted on March 18,2015.3Nathan C.Goldman,American Space Law:International and Domestic vii,85(1988).4http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaled_Composites_SpaceS hip Two,lasted visted on March 19,2015.5从国内零星报道来看,仅找到了一家叫翎客航天公司的中国民营企业从事航空系统产品的研发,其创始人为1993年出生的胡振宇,具体请见:http://baike.baidu.com/link?url=QW10cU skxQ Wpn P8ekumew ZQycsA GmzfA e_xyW h E7uxu JHzu J3cl1p Z3ZeX Cu LVcF 6fiT FX15t0uueL 8UFmE pw_40_J2u1VQh J-kq Af9S3W,last visted on March 22,2015。6Kenneth Chang,Obama Calls for End to NASA’s Moon Program,N.Y.Times(Feb.1,2010).7http://www.spacechina.com/n25/n144/n208/n232/c875293/content.html(last visted on March 25,2015).8http://baike.haosou.com/doc/2791926-2946857.html(last visted on March,2015).9http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-03/16/c_1114659488_5.htm(last visted on March 25,2015).1Brian Beck:The Next,Small,Step for Mankind:Fixing The Inadequacies of the International Space Law Treaty Regim to Accomadate the Modern Space Flight Industry,19 Alb.L.J.Sci.&Tech.1,4(2009).2Nathen.C.Goldman,American Space Law:International and Domestic vii,5(1988).3《空间物体登记管理办法》第3条。4《空间物体登记管理办法》第6条。5《空间物体登记管理办法》第12条。6《民用航天发射项目许可证管理暂行办法》第5条。7《民用航天发射项目许可证管理暂行办法》第6条。8《民用航天发射项目许可证管理暂行办法》第7条。9《民用航天发射项目许可证管理暂行办法》第20条。《民用航天发射项目许可证管理暂行办法》第21条。1Brian Beck:The Next,Small,Step for Mankind:Fixing The Inadequacies of the International Space Law Treaty Regim to Accomadate the Modern Space Flight Industry,19 Alb.L.J.Sci.&Tech.1,4(2009);M.J.Peterson,The Use of Analogies in Developing Outer Space Law,51 Int’l Org.245,252(1997);John Meisel,Communications in the Space Age:Some Canadian and International Implications,7 Int’l Pol.Sci.Rev.299,309(1986).2Nathen.C.Goldman,American Space Law:International and Domestic vii,5(1988);Robert R.Stieglitz,Long-Distance Seafaring in the Ancient Near East,47 Biblical Archaeologist 134,134(1984);William I.Robinson,Beyond Nation-State Paradigms:Globalization,Sociology,and the Challenge of Transnational Studies,13 Soc.F.561,567(1998).3Nathen.C.Goldman,American Space Law:International and Domestic vii,5(1988).4http://www.cnsa.gov.cn/n1081/n7469/n308501/index.html(last visted on March 25,2015).1http://www.cmse.gov.cn/AboutU s/list.php?catid=9(last visted on March 19,2015).2http://www.spacechina.com/n25/n142/index.html(last visted on March 25,2015).3http://www.casic.com.cn/n101/n119/index.html(last visted on April 8,2015).4http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_space_travelers_by_name(last visted March 25,2015).5http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search/List_of_spaceflight-related_accidents_and_incidentsA stronaut_fatalities(last visted March 25,2015).6http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaceflight_non-fatal_training_accidents(last visted March 25,2015).128 U.S.C.§§1346(b)(1):Subject to the provisions of chapter 171 of this title,the district courts,together with the United States District Court for the District of the Canal Zone and the District Court of the Virgin Islands,shall have exclusive jurisdiction of civil actions on claims against the United States,for money damages,accruing on and after January 1,1945,for injury or loss of property,or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment,under circumstances where the United States,if a private person,would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred.2Justin Silver:Houston,We have a(Liabllity)Problem,,112 Mich.L.Rev.833,3(2014).3Benjamin D.Hatch,Comment,Dividing the Pie in the Sky:The Need for a New Lunar Resources Regime,24 Emory Int’l L.Rev.229,293(2010).4Wayne N.White,Jr.,Real Property Rights in Outer Space,Proc.40th Colloquium on L.Outer Space 370,379(1998).5Blake Gilson,Defending Your Client’s Property Rights in Space:A Practical Guide for the Lunar Litigator,80 Fordham L.Rev.1388(2011).1Wayne N.White,Jr.,Implications of a Proposal for Real Property Rights in Outer Space,Proc.42nd Colloquium On L.Outer Space 366,(1999);Claudia Pastorius,Law and Policy in the Global Space industry’s Lift-Off,19 Barry L.Rev.201,(2013).ect.2http://bigthink.com/ideafeed/would-you-visit-a-national-park-on-the-moon(last visted on March 29,2015).3Carol Rose,The Comedy of the Commons:Custom,Commerce,and Inherently Public Property,53 U.Chi.L.Rev.711,723(1986).4参见《外层空间法》第10条。5参见《责任公约》第8条。6参见《责任公约》第9条。7参见《联合国国家及其财产豁免公约》第10(3)条。1参见:[荷兰]迪德利克·弗斯科尔,韩联潮译:《空间法的发展趋势》,外交学院学报,1985年7月2日,第42页。2参见李成:“载人航空器法律制度探析”,湘潭大学2010年硕士学位论文;Armel Kerres,t“面临私有化和单边主义危险的空间法”,吕丽萍译,李滨校,载《空间法评论(二、三卷)》2008年版。3U.S Code§20111.4U.S Code§20114.5Claudia Pastorius:Law and Policy in the Global Space Industry’s Lift-Off,19 Barry L.Rev.201,4(2013);President and Fellows of Harvard College,Commercialization of Space Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act of 2004,17 Harv.J.L.&Tech.619,622(2004).6Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act of 2004,51 U.S.C.A.§50901(a)(10)(West 2010).7Claudia Pastorius:Law and Policy in the Global Space Industry’s Lift-Off,19 Barry L.Rev.201,5(2013).8http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/FY_15_agency_fact_sheet(1).pdf(last visted on March 25,2015).1参见《外层空间公约》第5条。2参见《营救协定》第1条、第2条。3参见《营救协定》第2条。4参见《营救协定》第3条。5参见《营救协定》第4条。6参见《营救协定》第5(5)条。7参见《责任公约》第2条。8参见《责任公约》第3条。9参见《责任公约》第5条。参见《责任公约》第6条。参见《责任公约》第8、9条。参见《责任公约》第10条。参见《责任公约》第12条。参见《责任公约》第14-20条。1 14 C.F.R§414.7(b).2 14 C.F.R.§414(3).3 Justin Silver:Houston,We have a(Liability)Problem,112 Mich.L.Rev.833,3(2014).4 Cal.Civ.Code§2210(d)(West Supp.2013);Va.Code Ann.§§8.01-227.8 to.10(2007&Supp.2013).1Nathen.C.Goldman,American Space Law:International and Domestic vii,5(1988);S.Rep.No.103-202,at*1-2(1993),available at1993 WL 484770.2Colo.Rev.Stat.§§41-6-101(1)to(2)(a);Fla.Stat.§331.501(1)(c);N.M.Stat.Ann.§§41-14-2(J),41-14-3(A);Tex.Civ.Prac.&Rem.Code Ann.§100A.001(4);Va.Code Ann.§8.01-227.8.3Tex.Civ.Prac.&Rem.Code Ann.§§100A.001(4),100A.002(c).4N.M.Stat.Ann.§§41-14-2(C).551 U.S.C.A.§50914(a)-(c).6Cal.Civ.Code§2211(a);Colo.Rev.Stat.§41-6-101(3)(a)to(b);Fla.Stat.§331.501(3)(a)-(b);N.M.Stat.Ann.§41 -14-4(A);Tex.Civ.Prac.&Rem.Code Ann.§100A.003;Va.Code Ann.§8.01-227.10(A)to(B).7Cal.Civ.Code§2211(b);Colo.Rev.Stat.§41-6-101(3)(c);Fla.Stat.§331.501(3)(c);N.M.Stat.Ann.§41-14-4(B);Tex.Civ.Prac.&Rem.Code Ann.§100A.002;Va.Code Ann.§8.01-227.10(C).8Cal.Civ.Code§2212(b);Colo.Rev.Stat.§41-6-101(1)to(2)(a)(2013);Fla.Stat.§331.501(2)(a);N.M.Stat.Ann.§41-14-3;Va.Code Ann.§8.01-227.9(A).9Cal.Civ.Code§2210(b);Va.Code Ann.§8.01-227.8.Tex.Civ.Prac.&Rem.Code Ann.§100A.001(6).Cal.Civ.Code§2212;Colo.Rev.Stat.§41-6-101(2)(b);Fla.Stat.§331.501(2)(b);N.M.Stat.Ann.§41-14-3;Tex.Civ.Prac.&Rem.Code Ann.§100A.002(b);Va.Code Ann.§8.01-227.9(B).1Cal.Civ.Code§2212;Colo.Rev.Stat.§41-6-101;Fla.Stat.§331.501(2)(b).2P.J.Blount:Renovating Space:The Future of International Spacelaw,40 Denv.J.Int’l L.&Pol’y 515,5(2011-2012).3《维也纳条约法公约》第31条第1款:条约应依其用于按其上下文并参考条约之目的及宗旨所具有之通常含义,善意解释之。4参见《维也纳条约法公约》第32条。5参见《公海公约》第2条。6参见《南极公约》第4条。7参见《外层空间公约》第1条。1Jennifer Frakes,The Common Heritage of Mankind Principle and the Deep Seabed,Outer Space,and Antarctica:Will Developed and Developing States Reach a Compromise?,21 Wis.Int’l L.J.409,411-13(2003).2Aileen E.Nowlan,Stumbling Towards Distributive Justice,12 Chi.-Kent J.Int’l&Comp.L.99,102,125(2012).3Ty S.Twibell,Space Law:Legal Restraints on Commercialization and Development of Outer Space,65 UMKC L.Rev.589,641(1997).4《查士丁尼法学总论》规定,空气、流动水源、大海属于整个人类,因而受国家保护。http://www.braypapers.com/PTD.html(last visited April 8,2015).5Lee Anne Fennell,Adjusting Alienability,122 Harv.L.Rev.1403,1404(2009).6具体制度参照《海洋法公约》第133条-191条。7我国坚持国家及其财产豁免是国际法上的一项原则,国家本身或者以国家名义从事的一切活动均享有豁免。参见:赵相林(主编):《国际私法》(第二版),中国政法大学出版社2010年版,第81页。1 Paul Stephen Dempsey,Michael Milde,International Air Carrier Liability:The Montreal Convention of 1999,Published by Center for Research in Air&Space Law of McG ill University,12(2005).