程序与秩序:国际网购调整机制生成过程中的OArb
周立胜; 1:扬州大学法学院 摘要(Abstract)：

作为一种新型国际贸易形式之国际网购,正在重塑着国际贸易结构。随着国际网购之兴盛而产生了OArb(在线仲裁)——它是一种根植于某种计算机网络、依托某一网站与软件、由政府或私人为争端当事人提供的新型争端解决程序。OArb不仅有其自然法理论基础,还有其便利、高速、低耗、节省等特殊的程序价值,更通过确认或澄清已有国际网购行业常规做法、代替国际网购实体法、直接塑造网购习惯法三种方式展示其实体法意义,从而在秩序创制、秩序表达、秩序维护及秩序价值追求等方面显现其国际网购秩序意义,必将深刻影响国际贸易新格局。

关键词(KeyWords)： 国际网购;;OArb;;国际贸易秩序

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 江苏省社科基金项目“后金融危机时期对华贸易保护主义新法律措施研究”(10FXB002)之阶段性成果

作者(Author): 周立胜;

Email:


参考文献(References)： [1][德]海因里希-罗门:《自然法的观念史和哲学》,姚中秋译,海三联书店2007版。[2]梅特兰:《普通法的诉讼形式》,王云霞等译,商务印书馆2009年版。[3][英]尼古拉斯:《罗马法概论》,黄风译,法律出版社2000年版。1 http://wenku.baidu.com/view/d13cb46327d3240c8447ef55.html.2012,10,16.1Ethan Katsh,&Janet Rifkin,Online Dispute Resolution:Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace.San Francisco:John Wiley&Sons,INC.,32(2001).2Haitham A.Haloush&Bashar H.Malkawi,Internet Characteristics and Online Alternative Dispute Resolution.13 Harv.Negotiation L.Rev.327.3Amy J.Schmitz,Drive-Thru Arbitration in the Digital Age:Empowering Consumers Through Binding ODR.62 Baylor L.Rev.178(2010 winter).1Jeff Sovern,Toward A New Model of Consumer Protection:The Problem of Inflated Transaction Costs.47 Wm and Mary L.Rev.1635.2M.Ethan Katsh,Law in a Digital World.Oxford:Oxford University Press,14(1995).3Frank A.Cona,Focus on Cyberlaw:Applications of Online Systems in Alternative Dispute Resolution,45 Buff.L.Rev.975,990-91(1997).4Alan Redfern&Martin Hunter,Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration.Oxford:Oxford University press,67(3d ed.1999).5Hall St.Assocs.,L.L.C.v.Mattel,Inc.,128 S.Ct.1396,1404(2008).6279 Parl.Deb.,H.C.(6th ser.)(1996)86.7See Preston v.Ferrer,128 S.Ct.978,983(2008)1Arthur B.Pearlstein,The Justice Bazaar:Dispute Resolution Through Emergent Private Ordering as a Superior Alternative to Authoritarian Court Bureaucracy.22 Ohio St.J.on Disp.Resol.739.2H.L.A.Hart,The Concept of Law.Oxford:Oxford University Press,5(1961).3John Austin,Lectures on Jurisprudence or The Philosophy of Positive Law.Oxford:BiblioLife,LLC,11(1863).4Robert D.Cooter,Decentralized Law for a Complex Economy:The Structural Approach to Adjudicating the New Law Merchant,144 U.Pa.L.Rev.1643,1644-45(1996).1Arthur B.Pearlstein,The Justice Bazaar:Dispute Resolution Through Emergent Private Ordering as a Superior Alternative to Authoritarian Court Bureaucracy.22 Ohio St.J.on Disp.Resol.739.2F.A.Hayek,Law,Legislation and Liberty.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,37(1973).3Robert A.Baruch Bush,Alternative Futures:Imagining How ADR May Affect the Court System in Coming Decades,15 Rev.Litig.455,469(1996).4Joshua T.Mandelbaum,Stuck in a Bind:Can the Arbitration Fairness Act Solve the Problems of Mandatory Binding Arbitration in the Consumer Context?94 Iowa L.Rev.1082,1091-92(2009).5Chi-Chung Kao,Online Consumer Dispute Resolution and the ODR Practice in Taiwan-A Comparative Analysis,5 Asian Soc.Sci.118(2009),available at http//:www.ccsenet.org/journal.html.1Saika,Voiding Trial De Novo Provision in Physician's Contract with His Patient.56 Cal.Rptr.,923(2007).2Bruce L.Benson,The Enterprise of Law:Justice Without the State.San Francisco:Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy,12(1990).3Lon L.Fuller,The Law in Quest of Itself.Chicago:Northwestern University,110-12(1940).4Bruce L.Benson,Economic Freedom and the Evolution of Law,18 Cato J.209,223-24(Fall 1998).5Robert C.Ellickson,Law and Economics Discovers Social Norms,27 J.Legal Stud.537,542-43(1998).1See Murray Gell-Mann,The Quark and the Jaguar:Adventures in the Simple and the Complex.New York:AW.H.Freeman,198(1994)2Joel R.Reidenberg,Lex Informatica:The Formulation of Information Policy Rules through Technology,76 Tex.L.Rev.577(1998).3See Antonis Patrikios,Resolution Of Cross-Border E-Business Disputes By Arbitration Tribunals On The Basis Of Transnational Substantive Rules Of Law And E-Business Usages:The Emergence Of The Lex Informatica.38 U.Tol.L.Rev.2714Scott R.Belhorn,Settling Beyond the Shadow of the Law:How Mediation Can Make the Most of Social Norms,20 Ohio St.J.on Disp.Resol.981,1023(2005).5Bruce L.Benson,The Enterprise of Law:Justice Without the State.San Francisco:Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy,14(1990).6See Cybersettle.com,About Cybersettle,http://www.cybersettle.com/pub/home/about.aspx(last visited December 29,2009).7Jennifer L.Mnookin,Virtual(ly)Law:The Emergence of Law in LambdaMoo,J.Computer-Mediated Comm.(1996),http://jcmc.indiana.edu/(discussing law and politics in LambdaMOO).8Philippe Gillieron,From Face-to-Face to Screen-to-Screen:Real Hope or True Fallacy,23 Ohio St.J.on Disp.Resol.323,324(2008).9William M.Landes&Richard A.Posner,Adjudication as a Private Good,8 J.Legal Stud.239,240(1979).1Amy J.Schmitz,Drive-Thru Arbitration in the Digital Age:Empowering Consumers Through Binding ODR.62 Baylor L.Rev.178(2010 winter).2Sir Henry Sumner Maine,Dissertations on Early Law and Custom.London:John Murray,p.389(1883).1 Arnold Vahrenwald,Out-of-Court Dispute Settlement Systems for e-Commerce,Report on Legal Issues,Part IV:Arbitration 168(EU Joint Research Centre,Oct.31,2000),http://www.vahrenwald.com/doc/part4.pdf.