美国联邦量刑指南实施效果——兼论对我国量刑规范化改革的启示
郭志远;赵琳琳; 1:安徽大学法学院 2:澳门科技大学法学院 摘要(Abstract)：

量刑公正是刑事司法中必不可少的一环。早在20世纪80年代美国就掀起了量刑改革运动,1987年联邦量刑指南的施行是重要标志。近年来我国推行的量刑规范化改革从中国实际出发,也借鉴了外国的先进经验,对于解决长久以来存在的量刑不公问题具有深远意义。不过,这项改革在我国的刑事司法实践中尚属新事物,需进一步总结经验再加以完善,美国量刑指南20多年来的实施状况将为此提供启发。

关键词(KeyWords)： 量刑指南;;量刑公正;;量刑标准;;量刑程序

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 教育部人文社科青年基金项目“贿赂案件证据制度研究”(编号10YJC820035)成果;;暨浙江省人文社科重点研究基地(诉讼法)科研成果(编号:SDSS2012YB003)

作者(Author): 郭志远;赵琳琳;

Email:


参考文献(References)： [1]18U.S.C.§3553(a)(2):the need for the sentence imposed(A)to reflect the seriousness of the offense,to promote respect for the law,and to provide just punishment for the offense;(B)to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct;(C)to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant;and(D)to provide the defendant with needed educational or vocational training,medical care,or other correctional treat-ment in the most effective manner.[2]2010_Guidelines_Manual_Full.pdf,http://www.ussc.gov/Guidelines/2010_guidelines/Manual_PDF/2010_Guidelines_Manual_Full.pdf,p.11.last visit2012/05/08.[3]United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual,Appendix C-Volume I,Volume II,Supplement to Appendix C,http://www.ussc.gov/Guidelines/2010_guidelines/Manual_PDF/Appendix_C_Vol_I.pdf,http://www.ussc.gov/Guidelines/2010_guidelines/Manual_PDF/Appendix_C_Vol_II.pdf,http://www.ussc.gov/Guidelines/2010_guidelines/Manual_PDF/Appendix_C_Supplement.pdf,last visit2012/05/08.[4]2010_Guidelines_Manual_Full.pdf,http://www.ussc.gov/Guidelines/2010_guidelines/Manual_PDF/2010_Guidelines_Manual_Full.pdf,last visit2012/05/08.[1]Amy L.Anderson and Cassia Spohn:Lawlessness in the Federal Sentencing Process:A Test for Uniformity and Consistency in Sentence Out-comes,Justice Quarterly,Volume27,Number3(June2010),pp.364366.[2]US Sentencing Commission:20100608_Judge_Survey.pdf,June2010,http://www.ussc.gov/Research/Research_Projects/Surveys/20100608_Judge_Survey.pdf,last visit2012/05/08.[3]Mistretta v.U.S.,488U.S.361(1989).[4]Richard T.Boylan,Do the Sentencing Guidelines Influence the Retirement Decisions of Federal Judges Journal of Legal Studies,Vol.33(January2004)p.235.[5]Gregory C.Sisk,Michael Heise and Andrew P.Morriss,Charting the Influences on the Judicial Mind:An Empirical Study of Judicial Rea-soning,New York University Law Review,No.5,Vol.73,p.1414(1998).[1]U.S.v.Booker,543U.S.220(2005).[2]The Office of General Counsel&United States Sentencing Commission,Supreme Court Cases on Sentencing Issues.pp.1213(July,2010),http://www.ussc.gov/Legal/Court_Decisions/Supreme_Court_Cases_201007.pdf,last visit2012/05/08.[3]Amy L.Anderson and Cassia Spohn:Lawlessness in the Federal Sentencing Process:A Test for Uniformity and Consistency in Sentence Out-comes,Justice Quarterly,Volume27,Number3(June2010),pp.372,389390.[4]CarolA.Brook,Racial Disparity Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines,Litigation,Fall2008,No.1,Vol.35,p.15.[5]Lynn Adelman,Jon Dietrich,Rita,District Discretion and Fairness in Federal Sentencing,Denver University Law Review,Issue1,Vol.85,p.57(2007).[6]David Mustard,Racial,Ethnic and Gender Disparities in Sentencing:Evidence from the U.S.Federal Courts,The Journal of Law&Econom-ics,Vol.44,p.285(2001).[7]Richard T.Boylan,Do the Sentencing Guidelines Influence the Retirement Decisions of Federal Judges Journal of Legal Studies,Vol.33(January2004)p.236.[8]Lydia Brashear Tiede,The Impact of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and Reform:A Comparative Analysis,The Justice Systems Journal,No.1,Vol.30,p.36(2009).[1]Ricardo J.Bascuas,The American Inquisition:Sentencing after the Federal Guidelines,Wake Forest Law Review,Vol.45,pp.34(2010).[2]Margareth Etienne,The Declining Utility of the Right to Counsel in Federal Criminal Courts:An Empirical Study on the Diminished Role of Defense Attorney Advocacy Under the Sentencing Guidelines,California Law Review,Vol.92,p.428(2004).[3]Blakely v.Washington,542U.S.296(2004),(O’Connor,J.,dissenting).[4]Joanna Shepherd,Blakely’s Silver Lining:Sentencing Guidelines,Judicial Discretion,and Crime,Hastings Law Journal,Vol.58(February2007),pp.535536.[5]“上诉率二审改判率等普遍下降”,载《法制日报》2010年10月13日。[1]Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure(2010),http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/Rule32.htm,last visit2012/05/08.[2]同上注。[1]Geoff Hall,Victim Impact Statements:Sentencing on Thin Ice,New Zealand Universities Law Review,Vol.15,p.143(1992).[2]“武汉法院尝试被害人参与量刑”,载《法制日报》2010年5月18日。[3]曾淑瑜:“论量刑之判断”,载《刑事政策与犯罪研究论文集(9)》,台湾地区“法务部”2006年11月编印。[4]Kenneth J.Peak,Justice Administration:Police,Courts,and Corrections Management,2nd ed.,Prentice Hall,p.175(1998).[1]美国法学会编:《美国模范刑法典及其评注》,刘仁文、王祷等译,法律出版社2005年版。[2]吴巡龙:“美国的量刑公式化”,载《月旦法学》2002年第6期。[3]周光权:“量刑基准研究”,载《中国法学》1999年第5期。[4]许金钗:“量刑准据于美国联邦法院之运作实务”,载台湾地区《司法周刊》第1324期。[5[美]伟恩·R·拉费弗、杰罗德·H·伊斯雷尔、南西·J·金:《刑事诉讼法》,卞建林、沙丽金等译,中国政法大学出版社2003年版。[6]高一飞:“论量刑调查制度”,载《中国刑事法杂志》2008年9月号。[7][美]约书亚·德雷斯勒:《美国刑事诉讼法精解》(第4版),魏晓娜译,北京大学出版社2009年版。[8]林钰雄:《严格证明与刑事证据》,法律出版社2008年版。[9][美]爱伦·豪切斯泰勒·斯黛丽、南希·弗兰克:《美国刑事法院诉讼程序》,陈卫东、徐美君译,中国人民大学出版社2002年版。[10]黄荣坚:“确认量刑的实质课题”,载《台湾本土法学》第57期。[11]曾淑瑜:“刑事诉讼法草案中以‘科刑不当’为上诉理由之研究”,载《华冈法粹》第36期。[12]蔡墩铭:《审判心理学》,台北水牛出版社1983年版。[13][美]本杰明·N·卡多佐:《法律的成长——法律科学的悖论》,董炯、彭冰译,中国法制出版社2003年版。