删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

Design of a C-band polarization rotator-splitter based on a mode-evolution structure and an asymmetr

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01




1.
Introduction




In recent years, photonic integrated circuits (PICs) have attracted wide attention due to their low power consumption, high data transmission rate and small chip size. Silicon-on-insulator (SOI), compatible with complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) processes, is the most commonly used platform for integrated photonics. However, the high refractive index contrast, which improves optical confinement and reduces chip dimensions, leads to a large birefringence of different polarization. Polarization independent devices have been investigated to address this problem. A straightforward approach to minimize the birefringence is to optimize the device size[1, 2]. Therefore, the difference in the effective index for the TM and TE mode can be reduced and single-mode conditions can be achieved. This method is more applicable to large SOI ridge waveguides. Other practical operations are required for silicon nanowires due to its compact size and manufacturing difficulty. Ultrasmall polarization beam splitters (PBSs), polarization rotators (PRs) and polarization rotator-splitters (PRSs) are desired for PICs. There are several different types of PBSs based on directional coupler (DC)[35], multimode interference (MMI)[6, 7] and Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI)[8, 9]. Compared with PBSs, it is difficult to realize polarization rotation using SOI nanowires because of the good polarization maintenance of a planar waveguide. PRs based on asymmetric structures such as periodically loaded waveguides and ridge waveguides with slanted sidewalls are proposed in Refs. [10, 11]. PRSs, which can realize polarization splitting and rotation simultaneously, are far more widespread. In Ref. [12], the PRS based on an asymmetrical directional coupler (ADC) is shown. However, the top cladding of this device is air. The integration with other SOI-based devices and stability is limited. Hence, it is of great significance to find PRSs with SiO2 top cladding. Ref. [17] presents a PRS covered by SiO2. This device is based on sub-wavelength grating and the design and fabrication are relatively complex. In Ref. [18], another type of PRS based on slot structure is proposed. Despite its compact size, the complicated structure restricts the use for chip integration. Table 1 summarizes several reported results of the silicon PRSs.






StructureCladdingDevice size (μm)Loss (dB)Extinction ratio (dB)Bandwidth (nm)Tolerance (nm)
Tapered DC [12]Air140< 1?2014
Taper-etched DC*[13]SiO2> 80< 0.5< ?3016050
Double-etched DC[14]SiO227< 0.5< ?2030< 10
ADC with a MMI filter[15]Air70< 1.5< ?2050
Bent DC[16]Air> 8.77< 1< ?184020
ADC with sub-wavelength gratings[17]SiO235< 1?10506
Tapered DC with slot*[18]SiO219.6< 0.6?205020
ADC with a MMI rotator and a bent DC filter[19]SiO247.5< 0.57< ?2085
*Simulation results.





Table1.
Comparison of various silicon PRSs.



Table options
-->


Download as CSV





StructureCladdingDevice size (μm)Loss (dB)Extinction ratio (dB)Bandwidth (nm)Tolerance (nm)
Tapered DC [12]Air140< 1?2014
Taper-etched DC*[13]SiO2> 80< 0.5< ?3016050
Double-etched DC[14]SiO227< 0.5< ?2030< 10
ADC with a MMI filter[15]Air70< 1.5< ?2050
Bent DC[16]Air> 8.77< 1< ?184020
ADC with sub-wavelength gratings[17]SiO235< 1?10506
Tapered DC with slot*[18]SiO219.6< 0.6?205020
ADC with a MMI rotator and a bent DC filter[19]SiO247.5< 0.57< ?2085
*Simulation results.






2.
Device design and simulation




As is illustrated in Fig. 1, the device is designed on an SOI platform and the upper cladding is SiO2. The gray region represents the SiO2 cladding layer. The dark blue region represents the rib Si waveguides of 0.22 μm thickness and the light blue region represents a slab layer of 0.07 μm thickness. The mode-evolution structure is designed in a bi-level taper. Through the bi-level taper, the TM0 mode can be converted into TE1 mode and the TE0 mode propagates without mode conversion. An asymmetric directional coupler is utilized to split the TE1, TE0 mode into two waveguides, while the TE1 mode is coupled into the TE0 mode at the cross branch simultaneously.






onerror="this.onerror=null;this.src='http://www.jos.ac.cn/fileBDTXB/journal/article/jos/2018/12/PIC/18040014-1.jpg'"
class="figure_img" id="Figure1"/>



Download



Larger image


PowerPoint slide






Figure1.
(Color online) Schematic conifiguration of the prosposed PRS.




The rest of this section is composed of three parts: in Section 2.1, we introduce the mode evolution theory and propose the bi-level taper structure; in Section 2.2, we design and simulate the ADC in detail. Finally, in Section 2.3, we provide a complete demonstration of the PRS.




2.1
Bi-level taper principle and design




Due to the asymmetric characteristic of waveguides, mode evolution occurs when the structure is specifically designed. An asymmetrical Y-junction[20, 21] and asymmetrical Mach-Zehnder interferometers (MZIs)[22] are used as mode converters between TM0 mode and TE1 mode. However, the asymmetric Y-junction is difficult to manufacture for its high precision, and the asymmetric MZIs have a large footprint and high design complexity. In Ref. [23], a bi-level taper is indicated. This structure breaks the vertical symmetry to realize mode hybridization when light propagates along the waveguide. The fundamental TM mode is converted into high-order TE modes consequently.



To calculate the mode field profiles and determine the bi-level structure, we use a commercial 3D finite-difference time domain (3D-FDTD) software (Lumerical) as the simulation tool. In this paper, we choose a SOI wafer of 0.22 μm height and the refractive indices of Si and SiO2 are nSi = 3.455, and $n_{{text {SiO}}_2}$= 1.445, the rib width varies from 0.45 to 0.55 μm while the slab width varies from 0.45 to 2.4 μm simultaneously. The effective indices of modes supported in the waveguide are presented in Fig. 2. The TM0 mode develops in mode 2 as the layers’ width widens. It evolves into a hybridized mode of TM0 and TE1 modes at first and then TE1 mode finally. The mode features of TE0 mode remain unchanged.






onerror="this.onerror=null;this.src='http://www.jos.ac.cn/fileBDTXB/journal/article/jos/2018/12/PIC/18040014-2.jpg'"
class="figure_img" id="Figure2"/>



Download



Larger image


PowerPoint slide






Figure2.
(Color online) The calculated effective indices for the eigen modes of composite waveguide.




A schematic of the bi-level taper is demonstrated in Fig. 3. The input waveguide width W1 is determined by the ADC coupler. The bi-level taper widths W2, W3 and Wt, chosen from the simulation results above, are 0.55, 0.45, and 2.4 μm respectively. We chose the taper widths L1 = 20 μm and Lt = 150 μm.






onerror="this.onerror=null;this.src='http://www.jos.ac.cn/fileBDTXB/journal/article/jos/2018/12/PIC/18040014-3.jpg'"
class="figure_img" id="Figure3"/>



Download



Larger image


PowerPoint slide






Figure3.
(Color online) Schematic configuration of the prosposed bi-level taper.




We simulate the mode propagation and calculate the mode conversion efficiency. The results are shown below. In Fig. 4, we can observe the TE0 mode stays the same and mode evolution occurs from TE1 mode to TM0 mode when inputting the TE1 mode. The conversion efficiency is higher than 99% for both TE0 and TE1 modes, as is indicated in Fig. 5(a).






onerror="this.onerror=null;this.src='http://www.jos.ac.cn/fileBDTXB/journal/article/jos/2018/12/PIC/18040014-4.jpg'"
class="figure_img" id="Figure4"/>



Download



Larger image


PowerPoint slide






Figure4.
(Color online) Light propagation for (a) TE0 mode and (b)TE1 mode at 1550 nm.






onerror="this.onerror=null;this.src='http://www.jos.ac.cn/fileBDTXB/journal/article/jos/2018/12/PIC/18040014-5.jpg'"
class="figure_img" id="Figure5"/>



Download



Larger image


PowerPoint slide






Figure5.
(Color online) (a) The mode conversion efficiency for input TE0 and TE1 modes as a function of the wavelength. (b) The dependence of conversion efficiency on the variation of the slab height.




Fig. 5(b) illustrates the dependence of conversion efficiency on the variation of the slab height. The fabrication tolerance is within 10 nm while the conversion efficiency is more than 99%.




2.2
ADC structure and simulation




Multimode interference (MMI) couplers[24], Y-junctions[21] and ADCs[25] are applied as the universal solution to mode multiplexers. Among them, ADCs are increasingly concerned for the compact size and low design difficulty.



The basic principle of ADCs is based on mode selective coupling. The maximum power coupling efficiency is given by









$F = frac{1}{{1 + {{(delta /kappa )}^2}}},$


(1)



where $kappa $ is the coupling coefficient, $delta = ({beta _1} - {beta _2})/2$ (in which ${beta _1}$, ${beta _2}$ are the propagation constants of the ADCs). When $delta = 0;({beta _1} = {beta _2})$, the 100% power coupling efficiency can be achieved. In contrast, the mode-mismatching occurs when $delta ne 0$, and the F can be fairly low. To realize the mode-selective phase matching, the effective index of SOI waveguides is calculated precisely and the results are shown below in Fig. 6. For the fundamental TE0 mode and higher order TE1, TE2, TE3 modes, the effective index is quite different at the same width. Therefore, in an ADC, we can choose two waveguides of matched widths to satisfy the mode-selective phase matching condition.






onerror="this.onerror=null;this.src='http://www.jos.ac.cn/fileBDTXB/journal/article/jos/2018/12/PIC/18040014-6.jpg'"
class="figure_img" id="Figure6"/>



Download



Larger image


PowerPoint slide






Figure6.
(Color online) Simulated effective index of the optical modes in waveguides of different widths at 1550 nm.




The structure of the ADC is demonstrated schematically in Fig. 7. It has a narrow input waveguide and a wide coupling waveguide. As the cross section of the ADC shows, we choose the width of narrow input waveguide W0 = 0.4 μm, the coupling gap Gap = 0.4 μm, the ridge height H = 0.22 μm and the slab height Hslab = 0.07 μm. The width of wide coupling waveguide W1 can be obtained from Fig. 6. When W0 = 0.4 μm, the effective index of TE0 mode n0 = 2.682. To realize the full coupling between the input TE0 mode and the TE1 mode, W1 is chosen as 0.906 μm as the neff of TE1 mode is nearest to 2.682.






onerror="this.onerror=null;this.src='http://www.jos.ac.cn/fileBDTXB/journal/article/jos/2018/12/PIC/18040014-7.jpg'"
class="figure_img" id="Figure7"/>



Download



Larger image


PowerPoint slide






Figure7.
(Color online) Schematic configuration of the ADC.




To optimize the ADC structure and evaluate its performance, we use 3D-FDTD as simulation tools. When W1 = 0.906 μm, the transmission at the cross and through ports is shown in the red solid and dashed line in Fig.8. The extinction ratio (ER) at the wavelength 1550 nm is lower than ?20 dB while the EL is almost zero (less than 0.1 dB). The coupling length Lc is 38 μm. We simulate the transmission at W1 = 0.886, 0.896, 0.901, 0.911, 0.916, 0.926 μm to find the optimized width and measure the fabrication tolerance. As is shown in Fig.8, the fabrication tolerance is within 10 nm while the ER is lower than ?18 dB and at 1550 nm. The light propagation is shown in Fig. 9 for W1 = 0.906 μm at the wavelength of 1550 nm.






onerror="this.onerror=null;this.src='http://www.jos.ac.cn/fileBDTXB/journal/article/jos/2018/12/PIC/18040014-8.jpg'"
class="figure_img" id="Figure8"/>



Download



Larger image


PowerPoint slide






Figure8.
(Color online) Simulated transmission at the through and cross ports as a function of the wavelength.






onerror="this.onerror=null;this.src='http://www.jos.ac.cn/fileBDTXB/journal/article/jos/2018/12/PIC/18040014-9.jpg'"
class="figure_img" id="Figure9"/>



Download



Larger image


PowerPoint slide






Figure9.
(Color online) Light propagation for the ADC when W1 = 0.906 μm at 1550 nm.





2.3
Overview of the PRS




The full illustration of the mode propagation in our PRS is displayed in Fig. 10. For input TM polarization, the mode evolves into TE1 mode through the mode-evolution structure and is coupled into the TE0 mode in the cross waveguide. The input TE polarization propagates directly and is output from the through waveguide. The mode profiles of input TE/TM mode and output TE mode are also shown in Fig. 10.






onerror="this.onerror=null;this.src='http://www.jos.ac.cn/fileBDTXB/journal/article/jos/2018/12/PIC/18040014-10.jpg'"
class="figure_img" id="Figure10"/>



Download



Larger image


PowerPoint slide






Figure10.
(Color online) Light propagation for the proposed PRS when input (a) TM0 mode and (b) TE0 mode.




The transmission dependence of the PRS on the wavelength has been studied and the simulation results are demonstrated in Fig. 11.






onerror="this.onerror=null;this.src='http://www.jos.ac.cn/fileBDTXB/journal/article/jos/2018/12/PIC/18040014-11.jpg'"
class="figure_img" id="Figure11"/>



Download



Larger image


PowerPoint slide






Figure11.
(Color online) Simulated transmission at the through and cross ports as a function of the wavelength for the (a)input TE0 mod and (b) input TM0 mode.




When TE0 mode is injected into the device, the light almost fully passes the through waveguide and the ER is extremely low, less than ?35 dB. The EL is also lower than0.5 dB. As for input TM0 mode, the transmission is largely related to the coupling efficiency of the ADC. The simulated ER reaches the lowest value at 1562 nm, which is about ?23.7 dB. There is an increasing tendency for ER when the input wavelength changes from 1562 to 1570 nm, as well as changing from 1562 to 1530 nm. At the whole C-band, the ER is less than ?15 dB and the EL is less than 0.5 dB.




3.
Experiment and measurement




Fig. 12 shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images for the PRS. The device is fabricated on a SOI wafer with 0.22 μm thick silicon on a 3 μm thick buried oxide layer using electron-beam lithography. Then a SiO2 of 1.5 μm thickness is deposited on the waveguides through the method of plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition.






onerror="this.onerror=null;this.src='http://www.jos.ac.cn/fileBDTXB/journal/article/jos/2018/12/PIC/18040014-12.jpg'"
class="figure_img" id="Figure12"/>



Download



Larger image


PowerPoint slide






Figure12.
(Color online) Microscope and SEM image of the fabricated device.




The measuring procedures are described as follows.



We select a tunable laser to generate input light at the wavelength from 1527.5 to 1567.5 nm. After the laser, orthogonal linear polarizations (TE and TM) are acquired through the manually-adjustable polarization controller. Then the light is coupled to the chip using a silicon inverse taper covered by the air-bridge silicon dioxide intermediate transition waveguide. The power of the TE modes at the through and cross ports is measured by an optical power meter. We set a single straight waveguide as a reference and measure the output power in the same way as above. Thus, the output spectra of the PRS can be normalized by those of the reference waveguide. The coupling loss between one waveguide and one single-mode fiber is about 3 dB.



In Fig. 13, the transmissions at the through and cross ports for input TE0 and TM0 modes are shown respectively. For input TE0 mode, the EL is less than 1 dB and ER is less than ?30 dB at the wavelength from 1530 to 1565 nm. Due to the mode conversion and coupling existing, the input TM0 mode has a decrease in ER, less than ?10 dB at the wavelength from 1530 to 1565 nm while EL is less than 1.5 dB. The scattering loss due to the side-wall roughness of the waveguide and the fabrication inaccuracy of the ADC width should also be concerned intensively.






onerror="this.onerror=null;this.src='http://www.jos.ac.cn/fileBDTXB/journal/article/jos/2018/12/PIC/18040014-13.jpg'"
class="figure_img" id="Figure13"/>



Download



Larger image


PowerPoint slide






Figure13.
(Color online) Measured transmission at the through and cross port at different wavelengths for the (a) input TE0 mode and (b) input TM0 mode.




There are several prospective methods to improve the device performance. Since the TE1 mode is not fully coupled to the cross waveguide and part of the TM0 mode remains, filters used for modes cleanup can be added to the cross branch. As is shown in Refs. [4, 15], polarization filters are employed to ensure only one polarization using MMIs. Ref. [26] demonstrates a sub-wavelength-grating polarizer to filter out the weak cross-coupling for TE polarization. Similar operations can be adopted for the undesired TM0 mode left. Thus, the influence of the remaining TM0 and TE1 modes can be removed. Moreover, the bi-level taper of the mode evolution structure is supposed to be optimized in the future.




4.
Conclusion




In conclusion, we propose a CMOS-compatible PRS using a mode-evolution structure and an ADC. The input TM0 mode satisfies the mode evolution condition and develops into TE1 mode. The optimized width is selected therefore the TE1 mode is coupled into TE0 mode in the cross waveguide. The TE0 polarization propagates along the through waveguide without mode conversion. The PRS is designed on a SOI platform with the device length of ~250 μm. From the experimental results, the ER of ?30(?10) dB and EL of 1(1.5) dB for input TE(TM) mode are achieved at the whole C-band.



相关话题/Design polarization rotatorsplitter