试次历史对跨通道非空间返回抑制的影响

删除或更新信息，请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

张明¹(

), 桑汉斌², 鲁柯¹^,³, 王爱君¹(

)

¹苏州大学心理学系, 心理与行为科学研究中心, 苏州 215123
²西北师范大学心理学院, 兰州 730070
³成都市温江区信访局, 成都 611130

收稿日期:2020-03-03出版日期:2021-07-25发布日期:2021-05-24
通讯作者:张明,王爱君E-mail:psyzm@suda.edu.cn;ajwang@suda.edu.cn

基金资助:国家自然科学基金(31871092);国家自然科学基金(31700939);教育部人文社会科学项目(17YJC190024)

Effects of trial history on cross-modal non-spatial inhibition of return

ZHANG Ming¹(

), SANG Hanbin², LU Ke¹^,³, WANG Aijun¹(

)

¹Department of Psychology, Research Center for Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China
²School of Psychology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
³Wenjiang District Bureau of Public Complaints and Proposals of Chengdu, Chengdu 611130, China

Received:2020-03-03Online:2021-07-25Published:2021-05-24
Contact:ZHANG Ming,WANG Aijun E-mail:psyzm@suda.edu.cn;ajwang@suda.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 个体对刺激的反应不仅受刺激本身的影响, 还会受到先前刺激的影响, 表现为对当前试次中刺激的反应会受到前一试次的影响, 即试次历史。本研究采用“线索-中性线索-靶子”范式探讨前一试次有效性对跨通道的非空间返回抑制的影响。实验1通过连续两个试次间的线索有效性考察在跨通道非空间返回抑制中试次历史的影响。为了在跨通道非空间返回抑制中减小试次历史的影响, 实验2通过延长试次间时间间隔考察跨通道非空间返回抑制中试次历史的作用是否减小。结果发现, 前一试次线索无效时, 当前试次中的返回抑制效应量显著小于前一试次有效时, 这种影响会根据试次中线索和靶子通道的不同而不同。并且当延长试次间的时间间隔可以有效地减少前一试次对当前试次的影响。因此本研究表明, 试次历史能够对跨通道非空间返回抑制产生影响, 并且这种影响可以通过增大试次间时间间隔来减小。

图/表 4

图1实验1流程图。在单个试次中, 首先向被试呈现300 ms的中央注视点, 随后是300 ms的视觉或听觉线索, 线索消失后出现200 ms的中央注视点, 300 ms中性线索(视觉的中性线索为绿色圆盘), 中性线索消失后依然为一个300 ms的中央注视点, 最后呈现听觉或视觉靶子, 被试需要在1500 ms内对靶子的颜色做出反应, 两试次间时间间隔为1500 ms。

图2实验1中各个条件下的平均反应时和返回抑制(IOR)效应量(注：* 表示p< 0.05, ** 表示p< 0.01, *** 表示p< 0.001, 误差线为标准误)

图3实验1中各条件下的IOR效应量. (V)为当前试次中的靶子通道是视觉时, 各条件下的反应时; (A)为当前试次中靶子通道是听觉时, 各条件下的反应时(注：* 表示p < 0.05, ** 表示 p< 0.01, *** 表示p< 0.001, 误差线为标准误)。

图4实验2中各个条件下的平均反应时和IOR效应量(注：误差线为标准误)

参考文献 60

[1]	Bertelson, P. (1961). Sequential redundancy and speed in a serial two-choice responding task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13(2), 90-102. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470216108416478 doi: 10.1080/17470216108416478 URL
[2]	Bertelson, P. (1963). S-R relationships and reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 478-484. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0047742 doi: 10.1037/h0047742 URL
[3]	Chi, Y. K., Yue, Z. Z., Liu, Y. P., Mo, L., & Chen, Q. (2014). Dissociable identity- and modality-specific neural representations as revealed by cross-modal nonspatial inhibition of return. Human Brain Mapping, 35(8), 4002-4015. http://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22454 doi: 10.1002/hbm.v35.8 URL
[4]	Fintor, E., Stephan, D. N., & Koch, I. (2019). The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 955-965. http://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818771836 doi: 10.1177/1747021818771836 URL
[5]	Fox, E., & de Fockert, J.-W. (2001). Inhibitory effects of repeating color and shape: Inhibition of return or repetition blindness? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 798-812. http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.4.798 doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.4.798 URL
[6]	Fritsche, M., Mostert, P., & de Lange, F. P. (2017). Opposite effects of recent history on perception and decision. Current Biology, 27(4), 590-595. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.006 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.006 URL
[7]	Garcia, A. C., Bhangal, S., Velasquez, A. G., Geisler, M. W., & Morsella, E. (2016). Metacognition of working memory performance: Trial-by-trial subjective effects from a new paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 927. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00927
[8]	Goller, F., & Ansorge, U. (2015). There is more to trial history than priming in attentional capture experiments. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 77(5), 1574-1584. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0896-3
[9]	Guerreiro, M. J. S., Adam, J. J., & van Gerven, P. W. M. (2012). Automatic selective attention as a function of sensory modality in aging. Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(2), 194-202. http://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr090
[10]	Heitz, R. P., & Engle, R. W. (2007). Focusing the spotlight: individual differences in visual attention control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 217-240. http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.217 doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.217 URL
[11]	Hsieh, S., & Liu, L. C. (2005). The nature of switch cost: task set configuration or carry-over effect? Cognitive Brain Research, 22(2), 165-175. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.08.006 doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.08.006 URL
[12]	Huang, S., Li, Y., Zhang, W., Zhang, B., Liu, X. Z., Mo, L., & Chen, Q. (2015). Multisensory competition is modulated by sensory pathway interactions with fronto-sensorimotor and default-mode network regions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(24), 9064-9077. http://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3760-14.2015 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3760-14.2015 URLpmid: 26085631
[13]	Jiang, H. (2018). Reconfiguration and interference in voluntary task switching. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(9), 1624-1631. http://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01624
	[蒋浩. (2018). 自主任务转换中的重构和干扰. 心理科学进展, 26(9), 1624-1631.]
[14]	Jongen, E. M. M., & Smulders, F. T. Y. (2007). Sequence effects in a spatial cueing task: Endogenous orienting is sensitive to orienting in the preceding trial. Psychological Research, 71(5), 516-523. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0065-3 doi: 10.1007/s00426-006-0065-3 URL
[15]	Kayser, S. J., & Kayser, C. (2018). Trial by trial dependencies in multisensory perception and their correlates in dynamic brain activity. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 3742. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22137-8 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22137-8 URL
[16]	Keye, D., Wilhelm, O., Oberauer, K., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2009). Individual differences in conflict-monitoring: testing means and covariance hypothesis about the Simon and the Eriksen Flanker task. Psychological Research, 73(6), 762-776. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0188-9 doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0188-9 URL
[17]	Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching--A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849-874. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0019842 doi: 10.1037/a0019842 URL
[18]	Klein, R. M., & Ivanoff, J. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), 138-147. http://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.3650 doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01452-2 URL
[19]	Kwak, H. W., & Egeth, H. (1992). Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes. Perception and Psychophysics, 51(5), 455-464. http://doi.org/10.3758/bf03211641 URLpmid: 1594435
[20]	Law, M. B., Pratt, J., & Abrams, R. A. (1995). Color-based inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 57(3), 402-408. http://doi.org/10.3758/bf03213064 URLpmid: 7770330
[21]	Lee, A. K. C., Hämäläinen, M. S., Dyckman, K. A., Barton, J. J. S., & Manoach, D. S. (2011). Saccadic preparation in the frontal eye field is modulated by distinct trial history effects as revealed by magnetoencephalography. Cerebral Cortex, 21(2), 245-253. http://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq057 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq057 URL
[22]	Lupiáñez, J., Klein, R. M., & Bartolomeo, P. (2006). Inhibition of return: Twenty years after. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(7), 1003-1014. http://doi.org/10.1080/02643290600588095
[23]	Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory and Cognition, 22(6), 657-672. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209251 doi: 10.3758/BF03209251 URL
[24]	Mazza, V., Turatto, M., Rossi, M., & Umilta, C. (2007). How automatic are audiovisual links in exogenous spatial attention? Neuropsychologia, 45(3), 514-522. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.010 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.010 URL
[25]	Mccarley, J. S., Kramer, A. F., Colcombe, A. M., & Scialfa, C. T. (2010). Priming of pop-out in visual search: A comparison of young and old adults. Aging Neuropsychology & Cognition, 11(1), 80-88. http://doi.org/10.1076/anec.11.1.80.29362
[26]	McKenna, F. P., & Sharma, D. (2004). Reversing the emotional stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: The role of fast and slow components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 30(2), 382-392. http://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.382 doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.382 URL
[27]	Mike, W., Stina, K., & Tilo, S. (2017). More than attentional tuning - Investigating the mechanisms underlying practice gains and preparation in task switching. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 682. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00682 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00682 URL
[28]	MittelstäDt, V., Miller, J., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Trading off switch costs and stimulus availability benefits: An investigation of voluntary task-switching behavior in a predictable dynamic multitasking environment. Memory and Cognition, 46(5), 699-715. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0802-z doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0802-z URL
[29]	Mondor, T. A., & Amirault, K. J. (1998). Effect of same- and different-modality spatial cues on auditory and visual target identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 745-755. http://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.745 doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.745 URL
[30]	Mondor, T. A., & Breau, L. M. (1999). Facultative and inhibitory effects of location and frequency cues: Evidence of a modulation in perceptual sensitivity. Perception and Psychophysics, 61(3), 438-444. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211964 URLpmid: 10334092
[31]	Monsell, S., & Mizon, G. A. (2006). Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 493-516. http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.493 doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.493 URL
[32]	Murray, M. M., Santis, L. D., Thut, G., & Wylie, G. R. (2009). The costs of crossing paths and switching tasks between audition and vision. Brain and Cognition, 69(1), 47-55. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.05.004 doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.05.004 URL
[33]	Peng, A., Kirkham, N. Z., & Mareschal, D. (2018). Task switching costs in preschool children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 172, 59-72. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.01.019 doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.01.019 URL
[34]	Poliakoff, E., O'Boyle, D. J., Moore, A. P., McGlone, F. P., Cody, F. W. J., & Spence, C. (2003). Orienting of attention and Parkinson's disease: Tactile inhibition of return and response inhibition. Brain, 126(9), 2081-2092. http://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awg210
[35]	Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance Vol X: Control of language processes (Vol. 32, pp.531-556). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
[36]	Pratt, J. (1995). Inhibition of return in a discrimination task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(1), 117-120. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214416 doi: 10.3758/BF03214416 URL
[37]	Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Rosenquist, J. N. (1996). Auditory cues and inhibition of return: The importance of oculomotor activation. Experimental Brain Research, 112(1), 119-126. http://doi.org/10.1007/bf00227185
[38]	Roggeveen, A. B., Prime, D. J., & Ward, L. M. (2005). Inhibition of return and response repetition within and between modalities. Experimental Brain Research, 167(1), 86-94. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0010-5 doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0010-5 URL
[39]	Scalf, P. E., Ahn, J., Beck, D. M., & Lleras, A. (2014). Trial history effects in the ventral attentional network. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(12), 2789-2797. http://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00678 doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00678 URL
[40]	Schneider, D. W. (2016). Perceptual and conceptual priming of cue encoding in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 42(7), 1112-1126. http://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000232
[41]	Shao, Z. (2013). Cognitive psychology (2nd ed.). Shanghai, China: Sanghai Educational Publishing House.
	[邵志芳. (2013). 认知心理学:理论、实验和应用(第2版). 上海: 上海教育出版社.]
[42]	Shin, E., & Chong, S. C. (2016). Electrophysiological revelations of trial history effects in a color oddball search task. Psychophysiology, 53(12), 1878-1888. http://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12766
[43]	Spence, C., & Driver, J. (1998). Auditory and audiovisual inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 60(1), 125-139. http://doi.org/10.3758/bf03211923 URLpmid: 9503917
[44]	Spence, C., Lloyd, D., McGlone, F., Nicholls, M. E. R., & Driver, J. (2000). Inhibition of return is supramodal: A demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition. Experimental Brain Research, 134(1), 42-48. http://doi.org/10.1007/s002210000442 doi: 10.1007/s002210000442 URL
[45]	Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M., & Burak, A. L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(3), 478-499. http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.3.478 doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.3.478 URL
[46]	van der Stoep, N.,van der Stigchel, S., & Nijboer, T. C. W. (2015). Exogenous spatial attention decreases audiovisual integration. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 77(1), 368-368. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0805-1 doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0805-1 URL
[47]	Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 601-626. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0019791 doi: 10.1037/a0019791 URLpmid: 20565170
[48]	von Bastian, C. C., & Druey, M. D. (2017). Shifting between mental sets: An individual differences approach to commonalities and differences of task switching components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(9), 1266-1285. http://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000333
[49]	Wang, A. J., Liu, X. L., Tang, X. Y., & Zhang, M. (2017). Inhibition of return at different eccentricities in visual field under three-dimensional (3D) world. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(6), 723-732. http://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2017.00723 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00723 URL
	[王爱君, 刘晓乐, 唐晓雨, 张明. (2017). 三维空间中不同视野深度位置上的返回抑制. 心理学报, 49(6), 723-732.]
[50]	Wang, A. J., Wu, X. G., Tang, X. Y., & Zhang, M. (2020). How modality processing differences affect cross-modal nonspatial repetition inhibition. PsyCh Journal, 9(3), 306-315. http://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.332 doi: 10.1002/pchj.v9.3 URL
[51]	Wang, A. J., Yue, Z. Z., Zhang, M., & Chen, Q. (2015). Interaction between spatial inhibition of return (IOR) and executive control in three-dimensional space. Experimental Brain Research, 233(11), 3059-3071. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4374-x doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4374-x URL
[52]	Wang, L. H., Yue, Z. Z., & Chen, Q. (2012). Cross-modal nonspatial repetition inhibition. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 74(5), 867-878. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0289-9 doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0289-9 URL
[53]	Wang, L. L., Qiu, J., Guo, Y. Q., Zhang, Q. L., & Luo, Y. J. (2010). Neural mechanisms of the spatial gradient distribution of inhibition of return: Evidence from an ERP study. Journal of Psychological Science, 5(5), 1074-1078. http://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2010.05.014
	[王丽丽, 邱江, 郭亚桥, 张庆林, 罗跃嘉. (2010). 返回抑制梯度效应的认知神经机制: 来自ERP研究的证据. 心理科学, 5(5), 1074-1078.]
[54]	Ward, L. M., McDonald, J. J., & Lin, D. (2000). On asymmetries in cross-modal spatial attention orienting. Perception and Psychophysics, 62(6), 1258-1264. http://doi.org/10.3758/bf03212127
[55]	Wu, X. G., Wang, A. J., Tang, X. Y., & Zhang, M. (2019). Different visual and auditory latencies affect cross-modal non-spatial repetition inhibition. Acta Psychologica, 200, 102940. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102940 doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102940 URL
[56]	Yang, Z., & Mayer, A. R. (2014). An event-related FMRI study of exogenous orienting across vision and audition. Human Brain Mapping, 35(3), 964-974. http://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22227 doi: 10.1002/hbm.22227 URL
[57]	Zhang, M., & Chen, Q. (2002). The effect of task demands on spatial-based IOR and color-based repetition disadvantage effect. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 34(5), 462-496.
	[张明, 陈骐. (2002). 任务需求对基于位置的返回抑制和基于颜色的重复劣势效应的影响. 心理学报, 34(5), 462-496.]
[58]	Zhang, Y., Peng, C. H., Sun, Y., & Zhang, M. (2013). Cognitive mechanism of visual inhibition of return. Advances in Psychological Science, 21(11), 1913-1926. http://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01913
	[张阳, 彭春花, 孙洋, 张明. (2013). 视觉返回抑制的认知机制. 心理科学进展, 21(11), 1913-1926.]
[59]	Zhou, A.-B., Sang, H.-B., Wang, A.-J., & Zhang, M. (2020). Visual aperiodic temporal prediction increases perceptual sensitivity and reduces response latencies. Acta Psychologica, 209, 103129. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103129 doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103129 URL
[60]	Zhou, X. L., & Chen, Q. (2008). Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting. Neuropsychologia, 46(11), 2766-2775. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.05.017 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.05.017 URL