删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

君子不忧不惧:君子人格与心理健康——自我控制与真实性的链式中介

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

葛枭语, 侯玉波()
北京大学心理与认知科学学院暨行为与心理健康北京市重点实验室, 北京 100871
收稿日期:2019-12-27出版日期:2021-04-25发布日期:2021-04-07
通讯作者:侯玉波E-mail:houyubo@pku.edu.cn

基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(31671159)

Confucian ideal personality traits (Junzi personality) and mental health: The serial mediating roles of self-control and authenticity

GE Xiaoyu, HOU Yubo()
School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing 100871, ChinaM
Received:2019-12-27Online:2021-04-25Published:2021-04-07
Contact:HOU Yubo E-mail:houyubo@pku.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 基于儒学经典命题提出君子人格通过自我控制与真实性的链式中介对心理健康产生正向效应的假设, 运用多种方法进行验证(总样本量为1169)。结果表明, 君子人格正向预测同时测量的心理健康(研究1)和6个月后测量的自尊、核心自我评价、情感平衡, 负向预测心理症状(研究4); 君子人格正向预测自我控制特质(研究1)和自我控制决策(研究3和研究4), 受到情境模拟操纵的自我控制提升心理健康与真实性(研究2), 受到回忆启动操纵的真实性提升心理健康(研究3); 链式中介作用也得到了同时和跨时间点测量、统计控制和实验控制等多方法结果的支持。君子人格水平较高的人, 更易自我控制, 由此感到自己的行为与真实自我更加一致与贯通, 因此具有更积极的心理状态。



图1基于儒学经典命题的整体假设模型
图1基于儒学经典命题的整体假设模型


表1研究1各变量的平均值、标准差及相关关系(N = 207)
变量 M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1.性别 0.48 0.50
2.年龄 32.96 7.97 -0.07
3.最高学历 2.99 0.68 0.17* -0.16*
4.君子人格 159.13 17.32 0.06 0.18* 0.25***
5.自我控制 73.26 7.41 0.01 0.10 0.17* 0.47***
6.真实性 57.75 8.55 -0.03 0.07 -0.01 0.38*** 0.45***
7.心理健康 183.29 58.43 0.03 0.09 0.09 0.44*** 0.44*** 0.40***
8.社会赞许性 18.70 9.68 -0.08 0.11 0.15 * 0.35*** 0.32*** 0.28*** 0.41***

表1研究1各变量的平均值、标准差及相关关系(N = 207)
变量 M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1.性别 0.48 0.50
2.年龄 32.96 7.97 -0.07
3.最高学历 2.99 0.68 0.17* -0.16*
4.君子人格 159.13 17.32 0.06 0.18* 0.25***
5.自我控制 73.26 7.41 0.01 0.10 0.17* 0.47***
6.真实性 57.75 8.55 -0.03 0.07 -0.01 0.38*** 0.45***
7.心理健康 183.29 58.43 0.03 0.09 0.09 0.44*** 0.44*** 0.40***
8.社会赞许性 18.70 9.68 -0.08 0.11 0.15 * 0.35*** 0.32*** 0.28*** 0.41***



图2自我控制与真实性在君子人格对心理健康效应中的链式中介作用(研究1)
图2自我控制与真实性在君子人格对心理健康效应中的链式中介作用(研究1)



图3人为控制自我控制后, 君子人格对真实性和心理健康的效应减弱(研究2)
图3人为控制自我控制后, 君子人格对真实性和心理健康的效应减弱(研究2)



图4人为控制真实性后, 君子人格与自我控制对心理健康的效应减弱(研究3)
图4人为控制真实性后, 君子人格与自我控制对心理健康的效应减弱(研究3)


表2研究4各变量的平均值、标准差及相关关系(N = 220)
变量 M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1.性别 0.55 0.50
2.年龄 21.30 2.13 0.07
3.君子人格 161.75 17.01 0.02 -0.01
4.自我控制 4.56 1.60 0.04 0.02 0.44***
5.真实性 69.35 6.47 -0.11 -0.08 0.62*** 0.44***
6.自尊 32.10 3.82 -0.07 -0.04 0.44*** 0.39*** 0.55***
7.核心自我评价 37.50 6.04 -0.16* -0.04 0.55*** 0.44*** 0.60*** 0.82***
8.情感平衡 7.04 2.09 -0.04 -0.01 0.52*** 0.39*** 0.54*** 0.59*** 0.67***
9.心理症状 32.90 20.08 0.05 0.06 -0.45*** -0.38*** -0.49*** -0.56*** -0.61*** -0.60***

表2研究4各变量的平均值、标准差及相关关系(N = 220)
变量 M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1.性别 0.55 0.50
2.年龄 21.30 2.13 0.07
3.君子人格 161.75 17.01 0.02 -0.01
4.自我控制 4.56 1.60 0.04 0.02 0.44***
5.真实性 69.35 6.47 -0.11 -0.08 0.62*** 0.44***
6.自尊 32.10 3.82 -0.07 -0.04 0.44*** 0.39*** 0.55***
7.核心自我评价 37.50 6.04 -0.16* -0.04 0.55*** 0.44*** 0.60*** 0.82***
8.情感平衡 7.04 2.09 -0.04 -0.01 0.52*** 0.39*** 0.54*** 0.59*** 0.67***
9.心理症状 32.90 20.08 0.05 0.06 -0.45*** -0.38*** -0.49*** -0.56*** -0.61*** -0.60***


表3自我控制与真实性在君子人格对心理健康效应中的链式中介作用(研究4)
自变量 以自我控制为
因变量
以真实性为
因变量
以自尊为
因变量
以核心自我评价为
因变量
以情感平衡为
因变量
以心理症状为
因变量
性别 0.03 ([-0.09, 0.15]) -0.13 ([-0.23, -0.03]) -0.03 ([-0.14, 0.08]) -0.13 ([-0.24, -0.03]) -0.01 ([-0.12, 0.10]) 0.02 ([-0.09, 0.14])
年龄 0.02 ([-0.10, 0.14]) -0.07 ([-0.17, 0.03]) -0.01 ([-0.12, 0.10]) -0.01 ([-0.11, 0.09]) 0.02 ([-0.09, 0.13]) 0.04 ([-0.07, 0.15])
君子人格 0.44 ([0.32, 0.56]) 0.53 ([0.41, 0.64]) 0.12 ([-0.03, 0.26]) 0.25 ([0.12, 0.38]) 0.26 ([0.11, 0.40]) -0.21 ([-0.36, -0.06])
自我控制 0.22 ([0.10, 0.33]) 0.16 ([0.03, 0.29]) 0.18 ([0.06, 0.29]) 0.13 ([0.01, 0.26]) -0.16 ([-0.29, -0.03])
真实性 0.40 ([0.25, 0.55]) 0.35 ([0.22, 0.49]) 0.33 ([0.18, 0.47]) -0.28 ([-0.43, -0.13])
以自我控制为中介的间接效应 0.07 ([0.02, 0.14]) 0.08 ([0.03, 0.14]) 0.06 ([0.01, 0.12]) -0.07 ([-0.14, -0.01])
以真实性为中介的间接效应 0.21 ([0.13, 0.31]) 0.19 ([0.11, 0.28]) 0.17 ([0.08, 0.28]) -0.15 ([-0.27, -0.06])
以二者为中介的间接效应 0.04 ([0.02, 0.08]) 0.03 ([0.01, 0.07]) 0.03 ([0.01, 0.07 ]) -0.03 ([-0.06, -0.01])
间接效应合计 0.32 ([0.23, 0.42]) 0.30 ([0.22, 0.40]) 0.26 ([0.15, 0.38]) -0.24 ([-0.38, -0.13])
R2 0.20 0.44 0.34 0.45 0.36 0.29
F 17.68 (p < 0.001) 42.39 (p < 0.001) 21.64 (p < 0.001) 34.92 (p < 0.001) 24.10 (p < 0.001) 17.73 (p < 0.001)

表3自我控制与真实性在君子人格对心理健康效应中的链式中介作用(研究4)
自变量 以自我控制为
因变量
以真实性为
因变量
以自尊为
因变量
以核心自我评价为
因变量
以情感平衡为
因变量
以心理症状为
因变量
性别 0.03 ([-0.09, 0.15]) -0.13 ([-0.23, -0.03]) -0.03 ([-0.14, 0.08]) -0.13 ([-0.24, -0.03]) -0.01 ([-0.12, 0.10]) 0.02 ([-0.09, 0.14])
年龄 0.02 ([-0.10, 0.14]) -0.07 ([-0.17, 0.03]) -0.01 ([-0.12, 0.10]) -0.01 ([-0.11, 0.09]) 0.02 ([-0.09, 0.13]) 0.04 ([-0.07, 0.15])
君子人格 0.44 ([0.32, 0.56]) 0.53 ([0.41, 0.64]) 0.12 ([-0.03, 0.26]) 0.25 ([0.12, 0.38]) 0.26 ([0.11, 0.40]) -0.21 ([-0.36, -0.06])
自我控制 0.22 ([0.10, 0.33]) 0.16 ([0.03, 0.29]) 0.18 ([0.06, 0.29]) 0.13 ([0.01, 0.26]) -0.16 ([-0.29, -0.03])
真实性 0.40 ([0.25, 0.55]) 0.35 ([0.22, 0.49]) 0.33 ([0.18, 0.47]) -0.28 ([-0.43, -0.13])
以自我控制为中介的间接效应 0.07 ([0.02, 0.14]) 0.08 ([0.03, 0.14]) 0.06 ([0.01, 0.12]) -0.07 ([-0.14, -0.01])
以真实性为中介的间接效应 0.21 ([0.13, 0.31]) 0.19 ([0.11, 0.28]) 0.17 ([0.08, 0.28]) -0.15 ([-0.27, -0.06])
以二者为中介的间接效应 0.04 ([0.02, 0.08]) 0.03 ([0.01, 0.07]) 0.03 ([0.01, 0.07 ]) -0.03 ([-0.06, -0.01])
间接效应合计 0.32 ([0.23, 0.42]) 0.30 ([0.22, 0.40]) 0.26 ([0.15, 0.38]) -0.24 ([-0.38, -0.13])
R2 0.20 0.44 0.34 0.45 0.36 0.29
F 17.68 (p < 0.001) 42.39 (p < 0.001) 21.64 (p < 0.001) 34.92 (p < 0.001) 24.10 (p < 0.001) 17.73 (p < 0.001)







[1] Boals,A., Vandellen,M.R., & Banks,J.B. (2011). The relationship between self-control and health: The mediating effect of avoidant coping. Psychology and Health, 26(8),1049-1062.
doi: 10.1080/08870446.2010.529139URLpmid: 21598180
[2] Chen,L. (2017). Confucius, Mencius and Xuncius: The lectures of Pre-Qin Confucianism. Beijing:SDX Joint Publishing Company.
陈来. (2017). 孔子·孟子·荀子:先秦儒学讲稿. 北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店.
[3] Deci,E.L., & Ryan,R.M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4),227-268.
doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01URL
[4] Deci,E.L., & Ryan,R.M.(Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self- determination research. University of Rochester Press.
[5] Deng,S.C.,& Gao,J. (2015). Big Five Personality and impulsive buying: The mediation of self-control and sensation seeking. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23(6),1098-1101.
邓士昌, 高隽. (2015). 大五人格对冲动消费的影响:一个中介模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23(6),1098-1101.
[6] Dhar,R., & Wertenbroch,K. (2012). Self-signaling and the costs and benefits of temptation in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(1),15-25.
[7] Diener,E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 67(8),590-597.
doi: 10.1037/a0029541URL
[8] Du,J.Z., Zhang,X., & Zhao,Y. (2012). Reliability, validation and construct confirmatory of core self-evaluations scale. Psychological Research, 5(3),54-60.
杜建政, 张翔, 赵燕. (2012). 核心自我评价的结构验证及其量表修订. 心理研究, 5(3),54-60.
[9] Du,W.M. (2014). Construction of spiritual humanism: From the modern interpretation of that “to return to the observance of the rites through overcoming the self constitutes benevolence”. Exploration and Free Views, (2),6-12.
杜维明. (2014). 建构精神性人文主义——从克己复礼为仁的现代解读出发. 探索与争鸣, (2),6-12.
[10] Fang,X. P.,Liu, J. P., & Zheng,Z.G. (2015). The relationship among self-supporting personality, self-efficacy and self-control of undergraduates. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 13(4),500-505.
方小平, 刘建平, 郑治国. (2015). 大学生自立人格、自我效能及自我控制的关系. 心理与行为研究, 13(4),500-505.
[11] Ferrer,M., & Krantz,M. (1987). Self-control, locus of control and social status in children. Psychological Reports, 60(2),355-358.
doi: 10.2466/pr0.1987.60.2.355URL
[12] Ge,X.Y. (2020a). Confucian ideal personality traits (Junzi personality) and subjective well-being: The mediating role of awe (Unpublished master’s thesis). Peking University, China.
葛枭语. (2020a). 君子之乐:君子人格与主观幸福感——敬畏的中介作用(硕士学位论文). 北京大学.
[13] Ge,X.Y. (2020b). Oriental wisdom for interpersonal life: Confucian ideal personality traits (Junzi personality) predict positive interpersonal relationships. Journal of Research in Personality, 89,104034.
[14] Ge,X.Y.,& Hou,Y.B. (2019). The structure and measurement of Junzi personality [Abstract]. In Chinese Psychological Society (Ed.),Proceedings of the 22nd National Academic Congress of Psychology. Hangzhou:Chinese Psychological Society.
葛枭语, 侯玉波. (2019). 君子型人格的结构与测量[摘要].见中国心理学会 (编).第二十二届全国心理学学术会议摘要集. 杭州:中国心理学会.
[15] Hayes,A.F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York:Guilford Press.
[16] Hofmann,W., Luhmann,M., Fisher,R.R., Vohs,K.D.,& Baumeister,R.F. (2014). Yes, but are they happy? Effects of trait self-control on affective well-being and life satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 82(4),265-277.
URLpmid: 23750741
[17] Jensen-Campbell,L., & Graziano,W.G. (2005). The two faces of temptation: Differing motives for self-control. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51(3),287-314.
[18] Jing,H.B. (2006). Confucian coping and its role to mental health. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38(1),126-134.
景怀斌. (2006). 儒家式应对思想及其对心理健康的影响. 心理学报, 38(1),126-134.
[19] Jing,H.B. (2007). What Confucianism can contribute to psychological counseling. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39(2),371-380.
景怀斌. (2007). 儒家思想对于现代心理咨询的启示. 心理学报, 38(2),371-380.
[20] Kernis,M.H.,& Goldman,B.M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38,283-357.
[21] King,R.B., & Gaerlan,M.J. M. (2014). High self-control predicts more positive emotions, better engagement, and higher achievement in school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(1),81-100.
[22] Kokkoris,M.D., Hoelzl,E., & Alós-Ferrer,C. (2019). True to which self? Lay rationalism and decision satisfaction in self-control conflicts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(2),417-447.
URLpmid: 30920281
[23] Lenton,A.P., Bruder,M., Slabu,L., & Sedikides,C. (2013). How does “being real” feel? The experience of state authenticity. Journal of Personality, 81(3),276-289.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00805.xURLpmid: 22812625
[24] Li,L.J., & Yang,D.S. (2001). Generic quality of life inventory. In Z. Zhang (Ed.),Manual of Behavioral Medicine Scales. Beijing: Chinese Medical Multimedia Press.
李凌江, 杨德森. 2001). 生活质量综合评定问卷.见张作记 (编).行为医学量表手册. 北京:中华医学电子音像出版社.
[25] Li,Z.H. (1985). On the History of Ancient Chinese Thought. Beijing:People’s Publishing House.
李泽厚. (1985). 中国古代思想史论. 北京:人民出版社.
[26] Liu,Q.Y. (2010). Preliminary Study on Authenticity: Questionnaire and Actuality (Unpublished master’s thesis). Southwest University, China.
刘群英. (2010). 个体真实性问卷的编制与实测(硕士学位论文). 西南大学.
[27] Liu,Q.Y., Zhang,J.F., & Chen,J. (2009). A brief introduction of authenticity research in psychology. Advances in Psychological Science, 17(6),1302-1308.
刘群英, 张进辅, 陈加. (2009). 个体真实性的心理学研究述评. 心理科学进展, 17(6),1302-1308.
[28] Luo,M.C., Huang,X.T., & Su,D. (2010). The impact of the Confucian culture to present mental health services of Chinese. Advances in Psychological Science, 18(9),1481-1488.
罗鸣春, 黄希庭, 苏丹. (2010). 儒家文化对当前中国心理健康服务实践的影响. 心理科学进展, 18(9),1481-1488.
[29] Nishida,A., Xu,K.M., Croudace,T., Jones,P.B., Barnett,J., & Richards,M. (2014). Adolescent self-control predicts midlife hallucinatory experiences: 40-year follow-up of a national birth cohort. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40(6),1543-1551.
URLpmid: 24714378
[30] Park,N., Peterson,C., & Seligman,M.E. P. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5),603-619.
[31] Ryff,C. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6),1069-1081.
[32] Schlegel,R.J., Hicks,J.A., Arndt,J., & King,L.A. (2009). Thine own self: True self‐concept accessibility and meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2),473-490.
[33] Seligman,E.P. (2002). Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.),Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp.3-9). New York:Oxford University Press.
[34] Sheldon,K.M., Elliot,A.J. Kim,Y.,& Kasser,T. (2001). What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2),325-339.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.325URLpmid: 11220449
[35] Sheldon,K.M., Ryan,R.M., Rawsthorne,L.J., & Ilardi,B. (1997). Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the big-five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6),1380-1393.
[36] Situ,Q.M. (2017). Problem behaviors among university students and their associations with Big-Five Personality and self- control. China Journal of Health Psychology, 25(2),317-320.
司徒巧敏. (2017). 大学生问题行为及其与大五人格和自我控制的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, 25(2),317-320.
[37] Song,W.J., & Park,J.W. (2019). The influence of stress on internet addiction: Mediating effects of self-control and mindfulness. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17,1063-1075.
[38] Spencer,S.J., Zanna,M.P., & Fong,G.T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6),845-851.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845URLpmid: 16393019
[39] Sutton,A. (2020). Living the good life: A meta-analysis of authenticity, well-being and engagement. Personality and Individual Differences, 153,109645.
[40] Tan,S.H., & Guo,Y.Y. (2008). Revision of self-control scale for Chinese college students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 16(5),468-470.
谭树华, 郭永玉. (2008). 大学生自我控制量表的修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 16(5),468-470.
[41] Tang,Y.J. (2009). Ten commentaries on Confucianism and other five treatises. Beijing:Peking University Press.
汤一介. (2009). 儒学十论及外五篇. 北京:北京大学出版社.
[42] Tangney,J.P., Baumeister,R.F., & Boone,A.L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2),271-324.
[43] Thomaes,S., Sedikides,C., van den Bos,N., Hutteman,R., & Reijntjes,A. (2017). Happy to be “me?” Authenticity, psychological need satisfaction, and subjective well-being in adolescence. Child Development, 88(4),1045-1056.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.12867URLpmid: 28598498
[44] Touré-Tillery,M., & Fishbach,A. (2015). It was(n’t) me: Exercising restraint when choices appear self-diagnostic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6),1117-1131.
URLpmid: 26414839
[45] Wang,X.D., Wang,X.L., & Ma,H.(Eds). (1999). Handbook of Mental Health Rating Scales (Updated Edition). Beijing: Press of Chinese Mental Health Journal.
汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. 编. (1999). 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版). 北京:中国心理卫生杂志社.
[46] Wills,T.A., Ainette,M.G., Mendoza,D., Gibbons,F.X., & Brody,G.H. (2007). Self-control, symptomatology, and substance use precursors: Test of a theoretical model in a community sample of 9-year-old children. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21(2),205-215.
doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.21.2.205URLpmid: 17563140
[47] Wood,A.M., Linley,P.A., Maltby,J., Baliousis,M., & Joseph,S. (2008). The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the Authenticity Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(3),385-399.
[48] Xu,J., Tan,J., Wang,Y.P., & Hu,M.Y. (2003). Evaluation of the self-rated health measurement scale-the revised version 1.0. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 17(5),301-305.
许军, 谭剑, 王以彭, 胡敏燕. (2003). 自测健康评定量表修订版(SRHMS V1.0)的考评. 中国心理卫生杂志, 17(5),301-305.
[49] Yang,L.H. (2015). Fifteen lectures on Neo-Confucianism in the Song and Ming dynasties. Beijing:Peking University Press.
杨立华. (2015). 宋明理学十五讲. 北京:北京大学出版社.
[50] Yang,L.H. (2017). Solving the problem of philosophy and times: On Neo-Confucianism in the Northern Song dynasty. The Forum of Leadership Science, (6),56-68.
杨立华. (2017). 哲学与时代问题的解决——兼谈北宋道学. 领导科学论坛, (6),56-68.
[51] Yang,L.H. (2018). One origin and endless changes: Essentials of monism of principles. Beijing:SDX Joint Publishing Company.
杨立华. (2018). 一本与生生:理一元论纲要. 北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店.
[52] Yang,L.H. (2019a). Character of this-worldliness and civilization of knowing the point where to rest. Journal of the Central Institute of Socialism, (2),77-80.
杨立华. (2019a). 此世品格与知止的文明. 中央社会主义学院学报, (2),77-80.
[53] Yang,L.H. (2019b). Fifteen lectures on Chinese philosophy. Beijing:Peking University Press.
杨立华. (2019b). 中国哲学十五讲. 北京:北京大学出版社.
[54] Zhang,K., Zhang,S., & Dong,Y.H. (2010). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with mental health. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 8(1),58-64.
张阔, 张赛, 董颖红. (2010). 积极心理资本:测量及其与心理健康的关系. 心理与行为研究, 8(1),58-64.
[55] Zheng,S.F., Sun,S.S., Huang,C., & Zou,Z.M. (2020). Authenticity and subjective well-being: The mediating role of mindfulness. Journal of Research in Personality, 84,103900.
[56] Zhou,H., & Long,L.R. (2004). Statistical remedies for common method biases. Advances in Psychological Science, 12(6),942-950.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6),942-950.
[57] Zhu,C.C, Wang,J., & Hou,Y.B. (2019). Influence of Confucian Junzi-style personality on employees’ creativity [Abstract]. In Chinese Psychological Society (Ed.),Proceedings of the 22nd National Academic Congress of Psychology. Hangzhou:Chinese Psychological Society.
朱呈呈, 王晶, 侯玉波. (2019). 儒家式君子型人格对员工创造力表现影响研究[摘要].见中国心理学会 (编). 第二十二届全国心理学学术会议摘要集. 杭州:中国心理学会.
[58] Zhu,X.(Compiler). (2011). The Chapter Variorum of the Four Books. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
朱熹 .撰. (2011). 四书章句集注. 北京:中华书局.




[1]葛枭语. 孝的多维心理结构:取向之异与古今之变[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(3): 306-321.
[2]江光荣, 李丹阳, 任志洪, 闫玉朋, 伍新春, 朱旭, 于丽霞, 夏勉, 李凤兰, 韦辉, 张衍, 赵春晓, 张琳. 中国国民心理健康素养的现状与特点[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(2): 182-198.
[3]任志洪,赵春晓,田凡,闫玉朋,李丹阳,赵子仪,谭梦鸰,江光荣. 中国人心理健康素养干预效果的元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(4): 497-512.
[4]韩毅初, 温恒福, 程淑华, 张淳淦, 李欣. 流动儿童歧视知觉与心理健康关系的元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(11): 1313-1326.
[5]范伟,任梦梦,肖俊泽,简增郸,杜晓明,傅小兰. 羞耻情绪对欺骗行为的影响:自我控制的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(9): 992-1006.
[6]杨睿娟, 游旭群. 对付出−回报失衡理论的推进——基于经济报酬对教师心理健康的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(9): 1184-1194.
[7]赵梦雪;冯正直;王毅超;赖薇;胡丰;刘可愚;夏凡;蒋娟;王佳;夏蕾. 1993~2013年常驻高海拔地区军人心理健康状态的横断历史研究[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(5): 653-662.
[8]费定舟;钱东海;黄旭辰. 利他行为的自我控制过程模型:自我损耗下的道德情绪的正向作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(9): 1175-1183.
[9]范伟; 钟毅平; 李慧云; 孟楚熠; 游畅; 傅小兰. 欺骗判断与欺骗行为中自我控制的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(7): 845-856.
[10]冯文婷;汪涛;魏华;周南. 孤独让我爱上你:产品陈列对孤独个体产品偏好的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(4): 398-409.
[11]黄四林;侯佳伟;张梅;辛自强;张红川;孙铃;窦东徽. 中国农民工心理健康水平变迁的横断历史研究:1995~2011[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(4): 466-477.
[12]任真;杨安博;王登峰;林颖. 中西方文化差异视角下领导?部属关系的结构模型[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(9): 1355-1377.
[13]任俊;李瑞雪;詹鋆;刘迪;林曼;彭年强. 好人可能做出坏行为的心理学解释 —— 基于自我控制资源损耗的研究证据[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(6): 841-851.
[14]窦凯;聂衍刚;王玉洁;黎建斌;沈汪兵. 自我损耗促进冲动决策:来自行为和ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(10): 1564-1579.
[15]辛自强,张梅,何琳. 大学生心理健康变迁的横断历史研究[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(5): 664-679.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4942
相关话题/控制 心理 北京 儒学 测量