青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 华中师范大学心理学院, 湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室, 武汉 430079
收稿日期:
2019-10-18出版日期:
2020-04-25发布日期:
2020-02-25通讯作者:
江光荣E-mail:grjiang@yeah.net基金资助:
* 国家社科基金重大招标项目(16ZDA232)Meta-analysis of the effect of mental health literacy intervention in Chinese people
REN Zhihong, ZHAO Chunxiao, TIAN Fan, YAN Yupeng, LI Danyang, ZHAO Ziyi, TAN Mengling, JIANG Guangrong()Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430079, China
Received:
2019-10-18Online:
2020-04-25Published:
2020-02-25Contact:
JIANG Guangrong E-mail:grjiang@yeah.net摘要/Abstract
摘要: 本研究遵循PRISMA-Protocol, 运用元分析的技术, 以心理健康素养的知识、污名态度和求助为结果变量, 考察干预效果及影响因素, 以期为更高效地提升心理健康素养提供参考。元分析共纳入38项研究。结果发现:干预对知识、污名态度和求助的即时效果量达到显著的中到大的效果(知识:g = 0.70, 污名态度:g = -0.52, 求助:g = 1.18)。亚组分析结果表明:心理健康素养的干预效果受地域、被干预者类型、干预中的互动与接触以及试验类型等多个变量的影响。后续研究应进一步探索心理健康素养的调节变量, 并结合中国文化, 制定针对不同干预对象的个性化干预方案, 以提升干预效益。
图/表 9
图1文献检索与筛选流程图
图1文献检索与筛选流程图
表1心理健康素养的干预:效果量及异质性检验和发表偏倚检验
结果 变量 | k | N | g (95% CI) | 敏感性检验 | 异质性检验 | 发表偏倚检验 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
g (95% CI) | Qw | df | I2 | Nfs | Egger’s intercept | SE | 95% CI | p | ||||
知识 | ||||||||||||
后测 | 22 | 9159 | 0.70***(0.51, 0.90) | 0.74*** (0.54, 0.95) | 337.26*** | 21 | 93.78 | 3416 | 0.67 | 1.53 | [-2.52, 3.86] | 0.67 |
6个月内 | 7 | 3222 | 0.67***(0.61, 0.74) | 无异常值 | 1.71 | 6 | 0 | 531 | 0.21 | 0.41 | [-0.84, 1.26] | 0.62 |
6个月后 | 4 | 209 | 0.74**(0.06, 1.41) | 1.001***(0.35, 1.66) | 22.91*** | 3 | 86.90 | 29 | 23.96 | 7.02 | [-6.23, 54.15] | 0.08 |
污名态度 | ||||||||||||
后测 | 26 | 8435 | -0.52**(-0.90, -0.16) | -0.64*** (-1.09, -0.19) | 1429.56*** | 25 | 98.25 | 1803 | -4.71 | 3.23 | [-11.36, 1.95] | 0.16 |
6个月内 | 7 | 4331 | -0.17 (-0.45, 0.12) | -0.121 (-0.59, 0.25) | 84.26*** | 6 | 92.88 | 0 | -6.12 | 1.20 | [-9.20, -3.04] | 0.004 |
6个月后 | 2 | 246 | -0.34**(-0.59, -0.09) | -0.32**(-0.62, -0.02) | 0.07 | 1 | 0 | / | / | / | / | / |
求助 | ||||||||||||
后测 | 9 | 2087 | 1.18***(0.55, 1.80) | 3.65 (-0.52, 7.82) | 493.41*** | 8 | 98.38 | 162 | 6.08 | 3.62 | [-2.49, 14.64] | 0.14 |
6个月内 | 2 | 2304 | -0.04 (-0.11, 0.04) | / | 0.87 | 1 | 0 | / | / | / | / | / |
6个月后 | 0 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / |
表1心理健康素养的干预:效果量及异质性检验和发表偏倚检验
结果 变量 | k | N | g (95% CI) | 敏感性检验 | 异质性检验 | 发表偏倚检验 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
g (95% CI) | Qw | df | I2 | Nfs | Egger’s intercept | SE | 95% CI | p | ||||
知识 | ||||||||||||
后测 | 22 | 9159 | 0.70***(0.51, 0.90) | 0.74*** (0.54, 0.95) | 337.26*** | 21 | 93.78 | 3416 | 0.67 | 1.53 | [-2.52, 3.86] | 0.67 |
6个月内 | 7 | 3222 | 0.67***(0.61, 0.74) | 无异常值 | 1.71 | 6 | 0 | 531 | 0.21 | 0.41 | [-0.84, 1.26] | 0.62 |
6个月后 | 4 | 209 | 0.74**(0.06, 1.41) | 1.001***(0.35, 1.66) | 22.91*** | 3 | 86.90 | 29 | 23.96 | 7.02 | [-6.23, 54.15] | 0.08 |
污名态度 | ||||||||||||
后测 | 26 | 8435 | -0.52**(-0.90, -0.16) | -0.64*** (-1.09, -0.19) | 1429.56*** | 25 | 98.25 | 1803 | -4.71 | 3.23 | [-11.36, 1.95] | 0.16 |
6个月内 | 7 | 4331 | -0.17 (-0.45, 0.12) | -0.121 (-0.59, 0.25) | 84.26*** | 6 | 92.88 | 0 | -6.12 | 1.20 | [-9.20, -3.04] | 0.004 |
6个月后 | 2 | 246 | -0.34**(-0.59, -0.09) | -0.32**(-0.62, -0.02) | 0.07 | 1 | 0 | / | / | / | / | / |
求助 | ||||||||||||
后测 | 9 | 2087 | 1.18***(0.55, 1.80) | 3.65 (-0.52, 7.82) | 493.41*** | 8 | 98.38 | 162 | 6.08 | 3.62 | [-2.49, 14.64] | 0.14 |
6个月内 | 2 | 2304 | -0.04 (-0.11, 0.04) | / | 0.87 | 1 | 0 | / | / | / | / | / |
6个月后 | 0 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / |
表2调节变量对知识的干预效果的元回归分析
调节变量 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b (95% CI) | SE | b (95% CI) | SE | b (95% CI) | SE | |
年龄 | -0.004 (-0.03, 0.02) | 0.012 | 0.001 (-0.02, 0.02) | 0.01 | 0.002 (-0.03, 0.02) | 0.01 |
地域 | ||||||
内地 | 0.18 (-0.27, 0.71) | 0.275 | 0.57** (0.16, 0.98) | 0.21 | 0.47 (-0.04, 0.98) | 0.26 |
港澳台[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | — | — |
干预周期 | — | — | -0.04 (-0.10, 0.02) | 0.03 | -0.03 (-0.10, 0.05) | 0.04 |
干预时间 | — | — | 0.02 (-0.01, 0.04) | 0.02 | 0.01 (-0.02, 0.04) | 0.01 |
日常是否接触患者 | ||||||
是 | -0.21 (-0.76, 0.34) | 0.28 | -0.33 (-0.96, 0.31) | 0.33 | ||
否[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | — | — |
干预中是否接触患者 | ||||||
是 | -0.86 (-1.88, 0.15) | 0.52 | 0.66 (-1.86, 0.53) | 0.61 | ||
否[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | — | — |
干预者与被干预者互动 | ||||||
高互动 | 1.23*(0.27, 2.18) | 0.49 | 1.03 (-0.11, 2.17) | 0.58 | ||
低互动[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | — | — |
被干预者间互动 | ||||||
有 | -0.47 (-1.44, 0.49) | 0.49 | -0.11 (-1.48, 1.27) | -0.11 | ||
无[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | — | — |
试验类型 | ||||||
RCT | — | — | 0.31 (-0.44, 1.06) | 0.38 | ||
非RCT [参照变量] | — | — | — | — | — | — |
R2 | 0.01 | 0.74 | 0.70 | |||
Q (df) | 0.55 (2) | 16.35* (8) | 15.81*(9) |
表2调节变量对知识的干预效果的元回归分析
调节变量 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b (95% CI) | SE | b (95% CI) | SE | b (95% CI) | SE | |
年龄 | -0.004 (-0.03, 0.02) | 0.012 | 0.001 (-0.02, 0.02) | 0.01 | 0.002 (-0.03, 0.02) | 0.01 |
地域 | ||||||
内地 | 0.18 (-0.27, 0.71) | 0.275 | 0.57** (0.16, 0.98) | 0.21 | 0.47 (-0.04, 0.98) | 0.26 |
港澳台[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | — | — |
干预周期 | — | — | -0.04 (-0.10, 0.02) | 0.03 | -0.03 (-0.10, 0.05) | 0.04 |
干预时间 | — | — | 0.02 (-0.01, 0.04) | 0.02 | 0.01 (-0.02, 0.04) | 0.01 |
日常是否接触患者 | ||||||
是 | -0.21 (-0.76, 0.34) | 0.28 | -0.33 (-0.96, 0.31) | 0.33 | ||
否[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | — | — |
干预中是否接触患者 | ||||||
是 | -0.86 (-1.88, 0.15) | 0.52 | 0.66 (-1.86, 0.53) | 0.61 | ||
否[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | — | — |
干预者与被干预者互动 | ||||||
高互动 | 1.23*(0.27, 2.18) | 0.49 | 1.03 (-0.11, 2.17) | 0.58 | ||
低互动[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | — | — |
被干预者间互动 | ||||||
有 | -0.47 (-1.44, 0.49) | 0.49 | -0.11 (-1.48, 1.27) | -0.11 | ||
无[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | — | — |
试验类型 | ||||||
RCT | — | — | 0.31 (-0.44, 1.06) | 0.38 | ||
非RCT [参照变量] | — | — | — | — | — | — |
R2 | 0.01 | 0.74 | 0.70 | |||
Q (df) | 0.55 (2) | 16.35* (8) | 15.81*(9) |
表3调节变量对污名态度的干预效果的元回归分析
调节变量 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b (95% CI) | SE | b (95% CI) | SE | b (95% CI) | SE | |
年龄 | -0.03 (-0.07, 0.01) | 0.023 | -0.04 (-0.10, 0.01) | 0.03 | -0.81 (-0.14, -0.02) | 0.03 |
被干预者类型 | ||||||
专业人员 | -0.88 (-2.26, 0.50) | 0.702 | -1.69 (-3.39, 0.55) | 1.14 | 0.12 (-2.55, 2.79) | 1.36 |
非专业人员[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | ||
地域 | ||||||
内地 | -0.28 (-1.51, 0.95) | 0.626 | -0.64 (-2.22, 0.94) | 0.82 | -1.25 (-2.79, 0.28) | 0.78 |
港澳台[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | ||
干预周期 | 0.04 (-0.21, 0.28) | 1.23 | 0.21 (-0.07, 0.49) | 0.14 | ||
干预时间 | 0.23 (-0.03, 0.07) | 0.03 | 0.01 (-0.04, 0.05) | 0.02 | ||
干预中是否接触患者 | ||||||
是 | -0.16 (-1.81, 1.49) | 0.84 | -0.74 (-2.31, 0.84) | 0.80 | ||
否[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | ||
干预者与被干预者互动 | ||||||
高互动 | -059 (-2.73, 1.55) | -0.59 | -0.48 (-2.39, 1.43) | 0.97 | ||
低互动[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | ||
被干预者间的互动 | ||||||
有 | 0.04 (-1.95, 2.04) | 1.02 | 0.63 (-1.23, 2.49) | 0.95 | ||
无[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | ||
试验类型 | ||||||
RCT | 2.33* (0.03, 4.65) | 1.18 | ||||
非RCT (参照变量) | — | — | — | — | ||
R2 | 0.23 | 0.30 | 0.45 | |||
Q (df) | 4.20 (3) | 6.14 (8) | 11.71 (9) |
表3调节变量对污名态度的干预效果的元回归分析
调节变量 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b (95% CI) | SE | b (95% CI) | SE | b (95% CI) | SE | |
年龄 | -0.03 (-0.07, 0.01) | 0.023 | -0.04 (-0.10, 0.01) | 0.03 | -0.81 (-0.14, -0.02) | 0.03 |
被干预者类型 | ||||||
专业人员 | -0.88 (-2.26, 0.50) | 0.702 | -1.69 (-3.39, 0.55) | 1.14 | 0.12 (-2.55, 2.79) | 1.36 |
非专业人员[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | ||
地域 | ||||||
内地 | -0.28 (-1.51, 0.95) | 0.626 | -0.64 (-2.22, 0.94) | 0.82 | -1.25 (-2.79, 0.28) | 0.78 |
港澳台[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | ||
干预周期 | 0.04 (-0.21, 0.28) | 1.23 | 0.21 (-0.07, 0.49) | 0.14 | ||
干预时间 | 0.23 (-0.03, 0.07) | 0.03 | 0.01 (-0.04, 0.05) | 0.02 | ||
干预中是否接触患者 | ||||||
是 | -0.16 (-1.81, 1.49) | 0.84 | -0.74 (-2.31, 0.84) | 0.80 | ||
否[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | ||
干预者与被干预者互动 | ||||||
高互动 | -059 (-2.73, 1.55) | -0.59 | -0.48 (-2.39, 1.43) | 0.97 | ||
低互动[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | ||
被干预者间的互动 | ||||||
有 | 0.04 (-1.95, 2.04) | 1.02 | 0.63 (-1.23, 2.49) | 0.95 | ||
无[参照变量] | — | — | — | — | ||
试验类型 | ||||||
RCT | 2.33* (0.03, 4.65) | 1.18 | ||||
非RCT (参照变量) | — | — | — | — | ||
R2 | 0.23 | 0.30 | 0.45 | |||
Q (df) | 4.20 (3) | 6.14 (8) | 11.71 (9) |
附表1中国心理健康素养干预效果的分析纳入研究的特征
附表1中国心理健康素养干预效果的分析纳入研究的特征
知识的亚组分析结果
亚组 | k | g (95% CI) | Z | Q | I2 (%) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地域 | ||||||
内地 | 13 | 0.46(0.40, 0.52) | 15.35*** | 201.26*** | 94.04 | p < 0.001 |
港澳台 | 9 | 0.86(0.79, 0.92) | 27.72*** | 55.58*** | 85.61 | |
被干预者类型 | ||||||
专业人员 | 3 | 0.44(0.26, 0.62) | 4.81*** | 2.04 | 2.16 | 0.024** |
非专业人员 | 19 | 0.65(0.60, 0.69) | 28.25*** | 330.51*** | 94.55 | |
干预者与被干预者互动 | ||||||
高互动 | 14 | 0.85(0.58, 1.13) | 6.12*** | 187.37*** | 93.06 | p < 0.001 |
低互动 | 8 | 0.46(0.29.0.63) | 5.37*** | 35.23*** | 80.17 | |
被干预者间的互动 | ||||||
有 | 14 | 0.88(0.82, 0.94) | 27.28*** | 184.76*** | 92.96 | p < 0.001 |
无 | 8 | 0.41(0.35, 0.47) | 13.52*** | 42*** | 83.33 | |
干预中是否接触患者 | ||||||
是 | 6 | 0.37(0.23, 0.51) | 5.21** | 39.80*** | 87.44 | p < 0.001 |
否 | 16 | 0.66(0.62, 0.71) | 282.02*** | 283.95*** | 94.68 | |
日常是否接触患者 | ||||||
是 | 9 | 0.78(0.63, 0.93) | 10.14*** | 95.34*** | 91.61 | 0.048* |
否 | 13 | 0.62(0.58, 0.67) | 26.78*** | 238.00*** | 94.56 | |
试验类型 | ||||||
RCT | 16 | 0.46(0.41, 0.52) | 15.98*** | 204.07*** | 92.65 | p < 0.001 |
非RCT | 6 | 0.88(0.81, 0.94) | 25.41*** | 48.66*** | 89.73 |
知识的亚组分析结果
亚组 | k | g (95% CI) | Z | Q | I2 (%) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地域 | ||||||
内地 | 13 | 0.46(0.40, 0.52) | 15.35*** | 201.26*** | 94.04 | p < 0.001 |
港澳台 | 9 | 0.86(0.79, 0.92) | 27.72*** | 55.58*** | 85.61 | |
被干预者类型 | ||||||
专业人员 | 3 | 0.44(0.26, 0.62) | 4.81*** | 2.04 | 2.16 | 0.024** |
非专业人员 | 19 | 0.65(0.60, 0.69) | 28.25*** | 330.51*** | 94.55 | |
干预者与被干预者互动 | ||||||
高互动 | 14 | 0.85(0.58, 1.13) | 6.12*** | 187.37*** | 93.06 | p < 0.001 |
低互动 | 8 | 0.46(0.29.0.63) | 5.37*** | 35.23*** | 80.17 | |
被干预者间的互动 | ||||||
有 | 14 | 0.88(0.82, 0.94) | 27.28*** | 184.76*** | 92.96 | p < 0.001 |
无 | 8 | 0.41(0.35, 0.47) | 13.52*** | 42*** | 83.33 | |
干预中是否接触患者 | ||||||
是 | 6 | 0.37(0.23, 0.51) | 5.21** | 39.80*** | 87.44 | p < 0.001 |
否 | 16 | 0.66(0.62, 0.71) | 282.02*** | 283.95*** | 94.68 | |
日常是否接触患者 | ||||||
是 | 9 | 0.78(0.63, 0.93) | 10.14*** | 95.34*** | 91.61 | 0.048* |
否 | 13 | 0.62(0.58, 0.67) | 26.78*** | 238.00*** | 94.56 | |
试验类型 | ||||||
RCT | 16 | 0.46(0.41, 0.52) | 15.98*** | 204.07*** | 92.65 | p < 0.001 |
非RCT | 6 | 0.88(0.81, 0.94) | 25.41*** | 48.66*** | 89.73 |
污名态度的亚组分析结果
亚组 | k | g (95% CI) | Z | Q | I2 (%) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地域 | ||||||
内地 | 13 | -0.87(-0.95, -0.79) | -19.99*** | 613.95*** | 98.21 | p < 0.001 |
港澳台 | 13 | -0.05(-0.11, 0.003) | -1.85 | 547.96*** | 97.81 | |
被干预者类型 | ||||||
专业人员 | 9 | -0.90(-0.98, -0.78) | -17.86*** | 629.08*** | 98.89 | p < 0.001 |
非专业人员 | 17 | -0.11(-0.16, -0.06) | -4.06*** | 600.51*** | 97.33 | |
干预者与被干预者互动 | ||||||
高互动 | 14 | -0.04(-0.1, 0.01) | -1.55 | 291.02*** | 95.53 | p < 0.001 |
低互动 | 12 | -0.88(-0.96, -0.80) | -21.11*** | 858.67*** | 98.72 | |
被干预者间的互动 | ||||||
有 | 14 | -0.02(-0.07, 0.04) | -0.63 | 536.20*** | 97.58 | p < 0.001 |
无 | 12 | -0.89(-0.97, -0.81) | -20.93*** | 590.20*** | 98.30 | |
日常是否接触患者 | ||||||
是 | 5 | -0.76(-0.92, -0.62) | -9.94*** | 16.53*** | 75.80 | p < 0.001 |
否 | 21 | -0.25(-0.30, 0.21) | -10.46*** | 1372.97*** | 98.54 | |
干预中是否接触患者 | ||||||
是 | 15 | -0.05(-0.11, 0.001) | -1.91 | 565.77*** | 97.53 | p < 0.001 |
否 | 11 | -0.89(-0.97, -0.81) | -20.93*** | 590.20*** | 98.31 | |
试验类型 | ||||||
RCT | 13 | -0.38(-0.47, -0.30) | -8.62*** | 313.31*** | 96.17 | p < 0.001 |
非RCT | 13 | -0.27(-0.32, -0.22) | -9.94*** | 1111.32*** | 98.92 |
污名态度的亚组分析结果
亚组 | k | g (95% CI) | Z | Q | I2 (%) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地域 | ||||||
内地 | 13 | -0.87(-0.95, -0.79) | -19.99*** | 613.95*** | 98.21 | p < 0.001 |
港澳台 | 13 | -0.05(-0.11, 0.003) | -1.85 | 547.96*** | 97.81 | |
被干预者类型 | ||||||
专业人员 | 9 | -0.90(-0.98, -0.78) | -17.86*** | 629.08*** | 98.89 | p < 0.001 |
非专业人员 | 17 | -0.11(-0.16, -0.06) | -4.06*** | 600.51*** | 97.33 | |
干预者与被干预者互动 | ||||||
高互动 | 14 | -0.04(-0.1, 0.01) | -1.55 | 291.02*** | 95.53 | p < 0.001 |
低互动 | 12 | -0.88(-0.96, -0.80) | -21.11*** | 858.67*** | 98.72 | |
被干预者间的互动 | ||||||
有 | 14 | -0.02(-0.07, 0.04) | -0.63 | 536.20*** | 97.58 | p < 0.001 |
无 | 12 | -0.89(-0.97, -0.81) | -20.93*** | 590.20*** | 98.30 | |
日常是否接触患者 | ||||||
是 | 5 | -0.76(-0.92, -0.62) | -9.94*** | 16.53*** | 75.80 | p < 0.001 |
否 | 21 | -0.25(-0.30, 0.21) | -10.46*** | 1372.97*** | 98.54 | |
干预中是否接触患者 | ||||||
是 | 15 | -0.05(-0.11, 0.001) | -1.91 | 565.77*** | 97.53 | p < 0.001 |
否 | 11 | -0.89(-0.97, -0.81) | -20.93*** | 590.20*** | 98.31 | |
试验类型 | ||||||
RCT | 13 | -0.38(-0.47, -0.30) | -8.62*** | 313.31*** | 96.17 | p < 0.001 |
非RCT | 13 | -0.27(-0.32, -0.22) | -9.94*** | 1111.32*** | 98.92 |
求助的亚组分析结果
亚组 | k | g (95% CI) | Z | Q | I2 (%) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地域 | ||||||
内地 | 4 | 2.10(1.78, 2.42) | 12.82*** | 324.21*** | 99.08 | p < 0.001 |
港澳台 | 5 | -0.05(-0.12, 0.01) | -1.60 | 3.38 | 0 | |
干预者与被干预者互动 | ||||||
低互动 | 2 | 0.11(-0.14, 0.36) | 0.84 | 0.24 | 0 | 0.55 |
高互动 | 7 | 0.03(-0.04, 0.10) | 0.83 | 492.83*** | 98.78 | |
被干预者间的互动 | ||||||
有 | 7 | -0.06(-0.13, 0.01) | -1.63 | 294.14*** | 98.30 | p < 0.001 |
无 | 2 | 0.89(0.68, 1.10) | 8.31*** | 294.14*** | 98.45 | |
日常是否接触患者 | ||||||
是 | 1 | 2.77(2.39, 3.16) | 14.02*** | 0 | 0 | p < 0.001 |
否 | 8 | -0.05(-0.11, 0.02) | -1.35 | 295.91*** | 97.63 | |
试验类型 | ||||||
RCT | 5 | 0.19(-0.04, 0.42) | 1.63 | 290.05*** | 98.62 | 0.16 |
非RCT | 4 | 0.02(-0.05, 0.09) | 0.58 | 201.41*** | 98.51 |
求助的亚组分析结果
亚组 | k | g (95% CI) | Z | Q | I2 (%) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地域 | ||||||
内地 | 4 | 2.10(1.78, 2.42) | 12.82*** | 324.21*** | 99.08 | p < 0.001 |
港澳台 | 5 | -0.05(-0.12, 0.01) | -1.60 | 3.38 | 0 | |
干预者与被干预者互动 | ||||||
低互动 | 2 | 0.11(-0.14, 0.36) | 0.84 | 0.24 | 0 | 0.55 |
高互动 | 7 | 0.03(-0.04, 0.10) | 0.83 | 492.83*** | 98.78 | |
被干预者间的互动 | ||||||
有 | 7 | -0.06(-0.13, 0.01) | -1.63 | 294.14*** | 98.30 | p < 0.001 |
无 | 2 | 0.89(0.68, 1.10) | 8.31*** | 294.14*** | 98.45 | |
日常是否接触患者 | ||||||
是 | 1 | 2.77(2.39, 3.16) | 14.02*** | 0 | 0 | p < 0.001 |
否 | 8 | -0.05(-0.11, 0.02) | -1.35 | 295.91*** | 97.63 | |
试验类型 | ||||||
RCT | 5 | 0.19(-0.04, 0.42) | 1.63 | 290.05*** | 98.62 | 0.16 |
非RCT | 4 | 0.02(-0.05, 0.09) | 0.58 | 201.41*** | 98.51 |
参考文献 107
[1] | Abdullah T., & Brown T. L . (2011). Mental illness stigma and ethnocultural beliefs, values, and norms: An integrative review. Clinical Psychological Review, 31(6), 934-948. |
[2] | Akobeng A. K . (2005). Principles of evidence based medicine. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 90(8), 837-840 |
[3] | Amaresha A. C., Kalmady S. V., Joseph B., Agarwal S. M., Narayanaswamy J. C., Venkatasubramanian G., ... Subbakrishna D. K . (2018). Short term effects of brief need based psychoeducation on knowledge, self-stigma, and burden among siblings of persons with schizophrenia: A prospective controlled trial. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 32, 59-66. |
[4] | Angermeyer M. C., & Matschinger H . (2004). The stereotype of schizophrenia and its impact on discrimination against people with schizophrenia: Results from a representative survey in Germany. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(4), 1049-1061. |
[5] | Arboleda-Flórez J., & Sartorius N . (2008). Understanding the stigma of mental illness: Theory and interventions. Chichester, England: Wiley. |
[6] | Bao S. H., Yuan G. Z., Zhao X. F., Wu Y., Zhou D. X., & Zhou X. Q . (2014). Influence of individual family education to internalized stigma in family members of the patients with schizophrenia engaging in community rehabilitation. China Journal of Health Psychology, 22(6), 834-836. |
[ 包炤华, 袁国桢, 赵幸福, 吴越, 周德祥, 周晓琴 . (2014). 个体化家属教育对社区康复精神分裂症家属病耻感的影响. 中国健康心理学杂志, 22(6), 834-836.] | |
[7] | Barker G . (2007). Adolescents social support and help-seeking behaviour: An international literature review and programme consultation with recommendations for action. World Health Organization. |
[8] | Berkeljon A., & Baldwin S. A . (2009). An introduction to meta-analysis for psychotherapy outcome research. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4-5), 511-518. |
[9] | Borenstein M., Hedges L. V., Higgins J. P., & Rothstein H. R . (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis (version 3.3). Englewood, NJ: Biostat. |
[10] | Borenstein M., Hedges L. V., Higgins J. P., & Rothstein H. R . (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons. |
[11] | Brijnath B., Protheroe J., Mahtani K. R., & Antoniades J . (2016). Do web-based mental health literacy interventions improve the mental health literacy of adult consumers? Results from a systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(6), e165. |
[12] | Brouwers M. C., Johnston M. E., Charette M. L., Hanna S. E., Jadad A. R., & Browman G. P . (2005). Evaluating the role of quality assessment of primary studies in systematic reviews of cancer practice guidelines. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 5(1), 8. |
[13] | Carrero I., Vila I., & Redondo R . (2019). What makes implementation intention interventions effective for promoting healthy eating behaviours? A meta-regression. Appetite, 140, 239-247. |
[14] | Chan J., Mak W., & Law L . (2009a). Combining education and video-based contact to reduce stigma of mental illness: "The same or not the same" anti-stigma program for secondary schools in Hong Kong. Social Science and Medicine, 68(8), 1521-1526. |
[15] | Chan S. W. C., Yip B., Tso S., Cheng B. S., & Tam W . (2009b). Evaluation of a psychoeducation program for Chinese clients with schizophrenia and their family caregivers. Patient Education and Counseling, 75(1), 67-76. |
[16] | Chen S. X., & Mak W. W. S . (2008). Seeking professional help: Etiology beliefs about mental illness across cultures. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(4), 442-450. |
[17] | Chen Z. Y., Wang Y. X., Guo F., Zhang J., & Jiang L . (2019). Survey on mental health literacy in China. In X. L. Fei & K. Zhang (Eds.), Report on national mental health development in China (2017-2018) (pp. 220-263). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press. |
[ 陈祉妍, 王雅芯, 郭菲, 章婕, 江兰 . (2019). 国民心理健康素养调查. 见 傅小兰, 张侃(编). 心理健康蓝皮书:中国国民心理健康发展报告(2017~2018) (pp. 220-263). 北京, 社会科学文献出版社.] | |
[18] | Chien W-T., Chan W. C. A. S . (2004). One-year follow-up of a multiple-family-group intervention for Chinese families of patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services, 55(11), 1276-1284. |
[19] | Chung K. F . (2005). Changing the attitudes of Hong Kong medical students toward people with mental illness. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 193(11), 766-768. |
[20] | Clement S., Lassman F., Barley E., Evans‐Lacko S., Williams P., Yamaguchi S., ... Thornicroft G . (2013). Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (7). |
[21] | Clement S., Schauman O., Graham T., Maggioni F., Evans-Lacko S., Bezborodovs N., ... Thornicroft G . (2015). What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Psychological Medicine, 45(1), 11-27. |
[22] | Corrigan P., Michaels P. J., & Morris S . (2015). Do the effects of antistigma programs persist over time? Findings from a meta-analysis. Psychiatric Services, 66(5), 543-546. |
[23] | Corrigan P. W., Larson J. E., & Ruesch N . (2009). Self‐stigma and the “why try” effect: Impact on life goals and evidence‐based practices. World Psychiatry, 8(2), 75-81. |
[24] | Corrigan P. W., Morris S. B., Michaels P. J., Rafacz J. D., & Rüsch N . (2012). Challenging the public stigma of mental illness: A meta-analysis of outcome studies. Psychiatry. Service, 63( 10), 963-973. |
[25] | Corrigan P. W., & Watson A. C . (2002). Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness. World Psychiatry, 1(1), 16-20. |
[26] | Egger M., Smith G. D., Schneider M., & Minder C . (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629-634. |
[27] | Fu R., Gartlehner G., Grant M., Shamliyan T., Sedrakyan A., Wilt T. J., ... Trikalinos T . (2011). Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(11), 1187-1197. |
[28] | Fung E., Lo T. L., Chan R. W., Woo F. C., Ma C. W., & Mak B. S . (2016). Outcome of a knowledge contact-based anti-stigma programme in adolescents and adults in the Chinese population. East Asian Arch Psychiatry, 26(4), 129. |
[29] | Fung K. M. T., Tsang H. W. H., Corrigan P. W., Lam C. S., & Cheng W. M . (2007). Measuring self-stigma of mental illness in China and its implications for recovery. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 53(5), 408-418. |
[30] | Furnham A., & Hamid A . (2014). Mental health literacy in non-western countries: A review of the recent literature. Mental Health Review Journal, 19(2), 84-98. |
[31] | Giandinoto J. A., Stephenson J., & Edward K. L . (2018). General hospital health professionals’ attitudes and perceived dangerousness towards patients with comorbid mental and physical health conditions: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 27(3), 942-955. |
[32] | Gong A. T., & Furnham A . (2014). Mental health literacy: Public knowledge and beliefs about mental disorders in mainland China. PsyCh Journal, 3(2), 144-158. |
[33] | Gratwick-Sarll K., & Bentley C . (2014). Improving eating disorders mental health literacy: A preliminary evaluation of the “Should I say something?” workshop. Eating Disorders, 22(5), 405-419. |
[34] | Griffiths K. M., Carron-Arthur B., Parsons A., & Reid R . (2014). Effectiveness of programs for reducing the stigma associated with mental disorders. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry, 13(2), 161-175. |
[35] | Gulliver A., Griffiths K. M., Christensen H., & Brewer J. L . (2012). A systematic review of help-seeking interventions for depression, anxiety and general psychological distress. BMC Psychiatry, 12(1), 81. |
[36] | Guyatt G., Oxman A. D., Akl E. A., Kunz R., Vist G., Brozek J., ... Schunemann H. J . (2011). GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(4), 383-394. |
[37] | Hadlaczky G., Hökby S., Mkrtchian A., Carli V., & Wasserman D . (2014). Mental Health First Aid is an effective public health intervention for improving knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour: A meta-analysis. International Review of Psychiatry, 26(4), 467-475. |
[38] | Han D. Y., & Chen S. H . (2014). Reducing the stigma of depression through neurobiology-based psychoeducation: A randomized controlled trial. Psychiatry Clinical Neurosciences, 68(9), 666-673. |
[39] | Han D. Y., Chen S. H., Hwang K. K., & Wei H. L . (2006). Effects of psychoeducation for depression on help-seeking willingness: Biological attribution versus destigmatization. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 60(6), 662-668. |
[40] | Hao Z. H., & Liang B. Y . (2011). Effect of group guidance on intention of seeking professional psychological help among university students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19(5), 699-702. |
[ 郝志红, 梁宝勇 . (2011). 团体辅导对大学生寻求专业性心理帮助意向影响的研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(5), 699-702]. | |
[41] | Haraguchi K., Maeda M., Mei Y. X., & Uchimura N . (2009). Stigma associated with schizophrenia: Cultural comparison of social distance in Japan and China. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 63(2), 153-160. |
[42] | Hengartner M., Loch A., Lawson F., Guarniero F. B., Wang Y. P., Rössler W., & Gattaz W. F . (2013). Public stigmatization of different mental disorders: A comprehensive attitude survey. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 22( 3), 269-274. |
[43] | Higgins J. P., Thompson S. G., Deeks J. J., & Altman D. G . (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557-560. |
[44] | Huang D., Yang L. H., & Pescosolido B. A . (2019). Understanding the public's profile of mental health literacy in China: A nationwide study. BMC Psychiatry, 19(1), 20. |
[45] | Huang M., Shi Y. B., He Q. N., Zhang Z. X., & Zhu Z. F . (2009). A study on knowledge rate of mental health of adolescent in pre and after intervention. Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health, 21(23), 3055-3056. |
[ 黄敏, 施永斌, 何琼娜, 张展星, 朱振芳 . (2009). 干预前后青少年心理健康知晓率调查研究. 中国民康医学, 21(23), 3055-3056.] | |
[46] | Huang Y., Wang Y., Wang H., Liu Z., Yu X., Yan J., ... Wu Y . (2019). Prevalence of mental disorders in China: A cross-sectional epidemiological study. The Lancet Psychiatry, 6(3), 211-224. |
[47] | Huedo-Medina T. B., Sánchez-Meca J., Marín-Martínez F., & Botella J . (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? Psychological Methods, 11(2), 193-206. |
[48] | Jadad A. R., Moore R. A., Carroll D., Jenkinson C., Reynolds D. J. M., Gavaghan D. J., & McQuay H. J . (1996). Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Controlled Clinical Trials, 17(1), 1-12. |
[49] | Jennings K. S., Cheung J. H., Britt T. W., Goguen K. N., Jeffirs S. M., Peasley A. L., & Lee A. C . (2015). How are perceived stigma, self-stigma, and self-reliance related to treatment-seeking? A three-path model. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 38(2), 109-116. |
[50] | Jiang G. R., & Xia M . (2006). Psychological help-seeking: Current research and the phases-decision-making model. Advances in Psychological Science, 14(6), 888-894. |
[ 江光荣, 夏勉 . (2006). 心理求助行为: 研究现状及阶段-决策模型. 心理科学进展, 14(6), 888-894.] | |
[51] | Jiang G. R., Zhao C. X., Yu L. X., Li D. Y., Lin X. B., & Ren Z. H . (in press). Mental health literacy: Connotation, measurement and new framework. Journal of Psychological Science. |
[ 江光荣, 赵春晓, 韦辉, 于丽霞, 李丹阳, 林秀彬, 任志洪 .(印刷中). 心理健康素养:内涵、测量与新概念框架. 心理科学.] | |
[52] | Jorm A. F . (2015). Why we need the concept of “mental health literacy”. Health Communication, 30(12), 1166-1168. |
[53] | Jorm A. F., Korten A. E., Jacomb P. A., Christensen H., Rodgers B., & Pollitt P . (1997). “Mental health literacy”: A survey of the public's ability to recognise mental disorders and their beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment. The Medical Journal of Australia, 166(4), 182-186. |
[54] | Kallapiran K., Koo S., Kirubakaran R., & Hancock K . (2015). Review: Effectiveness of mindfulness in improving mental health symptoms of children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 20(4), 182-194. |
[55] | Khoury B., Lecomte T., Fortin G., Masse M., Therien P., Bouchard V., ... Hofmann S. G . (2013). Mindfulness-based therapy: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(6), 763-771. |
[56] | Kitchener B. A., & Jorm A. F . (2002). Mental health first aid training for the public: Evaluation of effects on knowledge, attitudes and helping behavior. BMC Psychiatry, 2(1), 10. |
[57] | Kitchener B. A., & Jorm A. F . (2006). Mental health first aid training: Review of evaluation studies. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40(1), 6-8. |
[58] | Kung W. W., & Lu P. C . (2008). How symptom manifestations affect help seeking for mental health problems among Chinese Americans. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 196(1), 46-154. |
[59] | Kutcher S., Wei Y., & Coniglio C . (2016). Mental health literacy: Past, present, and future. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 61(3), 154-158. |
[60] | Lai E., Kwok C. L., Wong P., Fu K. W., Law Y. W., & Yip P . (2016). The effectiveness and sustainability of a universal school-based programme for preventing depression in Chinese adolescents: A follow-up study using quasi-experimental design. PloS One, 11(2), e0149854. |
[61] | Lam C. S., Tsang H. W., Corrigan P. W., Lee Y. T., Angell B., Shi K., ... Larson J. E . (2010). Chinese lay theory and mental illness stigma: Implications for research and practices. Journal of Rehabilitation, 76(1), 35-40. |
[62] | Li J., Fan Y., Zhong H. Q., Duan X. L., Chen W., Evans-Lacko S., ... Thornicroft G . (2019). Effectiveness of an anti-stigma training on improving attitudes and decreasing discrimination towards people with mental disorders among care assistant workers in Guangzhou, China. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 1(13), 1-10. |
[63] | Li J., Li J., Thornicroft G., Yang H., Chen W., & Huang Y. G . (2015). Training community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China: Evaluation of the effect of a new training model. BMC Psychiatry, 15(1), 263. |
[64] | Liberati A., Altman D. G., Tetzlaff J., Mulrow C., Gøtzsche P. C., Ioannidis J. P., ... Moher D . (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Plos Medicine, 6(7), e1000100. |
[65] | Liu J., Ma H., He Y. L., Xie B., Xu Y. F., Tang H. Y., ... Yu X . (2011). Mental health system in China: History, recent service reform and future challenges. World Psychiatry, 10(3), 210-216. |
[66] | Liu X . (1981). Psychiatry in traditional Chinese medicine. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 138(5), 429-433. |
[67] | Livingston J. D., & Boyd J. E . (2010). Correlates and consequences of internalized stigma for people living with mental illness: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 71(12), 2150-2161. |
[68] | Lui C., Wong C., & Furnham A . (2016). Mental health literacy in Hong Kong. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 62(6), 505-511 |
[69] | Mak W. W., Chong E. S., & Wong C. C . (2014). Beyond attributions: Understanding public stigma of mental illness with the common sense model. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 84(2), 173-181. |
[70] | Maunder R. D., & White F. A . (2019). Intergroup contact and mental health stigma: A comparative effectiveness meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 72, 101749. |
[71] | Mehta N., Clement S., Marcus E., Stona A. C., Bezborodovs N., Evans-Lacko S., ... Thornicroft G . (2015). Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental health related stigma and discrimination in the medium and long term: Systematic review. British Journal of Psychiatry, 207(5), 377-384. |
[72] | Ming Z. J., & Chen Z. Y . (2020). Mental health literacy: Concept, measurement, intervention and factors. Advances in Psychological Science, 28(1), 1-12. |
[ 明志君, 陈祉妍 . (2020). 心理健康素养:概念、评估、干预与作用. 心理科学进展, 28(1), 1-12.] | |
[73] | Morgan A. J., Reavley N. J., Ross A., San Too L., & Jorm A. F . (2018a) Interventions to reduce stigma towards people with severe mental illness: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 103, 120-133. |
[74] | Morgan A. J., Ross A., & Reavley N. J . (2018b). Systematic review and meta-analysis of mental health first aid training: Effects on knowledge, stigma, and helping behaviour. PloS One, 13(5), e0197102. |
[75] | Ng C. H . (1997). The stigma of mental illness in Asian cultures. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 31(3), 382-390. |
[76] | Orwin R. G . (1994). Evaluating coding decisions. The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 139-162). New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation |
[77] | Philip D . (2010). Social network analysis to examine interaction patterns in knowledge building communities. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1), 1-20 |
[78] | Phillips M. R., Li Y., Stroup T. S., & Xin L . (2000). Causes of schizophrenia reported by patients' family members in China. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 177(1), 20-25. |
[79] | Phillips M. R., Zhang J. X., Shi Q. C., Song Z. Q., Ding Z. J., Pang S. T., … Wang Z. Q . (2009). Prevalence, treatment, and associated disability of mental disorders in four provinces in China during 2001-05: An epidemiological survey. The Lancet, 373(9680), 2041-2053. |
[80] | Rao D., Feinglass J., & Corrigan P . (2007). Racial and ethnic disparities in mental illness stigma. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195(12), 1020-1023. |
[81] | Reavley N. J., Mackinnon A. J., Morgan A. J., & Jorm A. F . (2014). Stigmatising attitudes towards people with mental disorders: A comparison of Australian health professionals with the general community. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 48(5), 433-441. |
[82] | Rickwood D., & Thomas K . (2012) Conceptual measurement framework for help-seeking for mental health problems. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 5, 173-183. |
[83] | Rong Y., Glozier N., Luscombe G. M., Davenport T. A., Huang Y. Q., & Hickie I. B . (2011). Improving knowledge and attitudes towards depression: A controlled trial among Chinese medical students. BMC Psychiatry, 11(1), 36. |
[84] | Rossetto A., Jorm A. F., & Reavley N. J . (2016). Predictors of adults' helping intentions and behaviours towards a person with a mental illness: A six-month follow-up study. Psychiatry Research, 240, 170-176. |
[85] | Rothstein H. R., Sutton A. J., & Borenstein M . (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. |
[86] | Rüsch N., Todd A. R., Bodenhausen G. V., & Corrigan P. W . (2010). Biogenetic models of psychopathology, implicit guilt, and mental illness stigma. Psychiatry Research, 179(3), 328-332. |
[87] | Shi Y., Shao Y., Li H., Wang S., Ying J., Zhang M., ... Sun J . (2019). Correlates of affiliate stigma among family caregivers of people with mental illness: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 26(1-2), 49-61. |
[88] | Sun F. K., Long A., Huang X. Y., & Chiang C. Y . (2011). A quasi-experimental investigation into the efficacy of a suicide education programme for second-year student nurses in Taiwan. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(5-6), 837-846. |
[89] | Thikeo M., Florin P., & Ng C . (2015). Help seeking attitudes among Cambodian and Laotian refugees: Implications for public mental health approaches. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 17(6), 1679-1686. |
[90] | Tu Y. M., Li X., Cao X. M., Zhu X. J., Xu W. J., Zhang L., ... Ni L . (2018). Effect of synchronous mental illness education of relatives of schizophrenics on patient medication compliance. Shanghai Nursing, 18(4), 19-23. |
[ 屠一敏, 李霞, 曹新妹, 朱晓洁, 徐文静, 张丽, ... 倪琳 . (2018). 家属同步教育对精神分裂症患者治疗依从性的影响. 上海护理, 18(4), 19-23.] | |
[91] | Vøllestad J., Nielsen M. B., & Nielsen G. H . (2012). Mindfulness-and acceptance-based interventions for anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51(3), 239-260. |
[92] | Wang F . (2018). The education intervention stigma of depression: Based on the core dimension of mental illness view (Unpublished master's dissertation). Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China. |
[ 王枫 . (2018). 教育对抑郁症污名的干预:基于心理疾病观核心维度 (硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.] | |
[93] | Wang J. Y., Li S. R., Sun Y. X., Li Y., Zhang D. H., & Guo D. M . (2017). The effect of narrative nursing teaching on public stigma of mental illness in nursing undergraduates. Journal Clinical Psychosom Disease, 23(3), 146-148. |
[ 王剑英, 李拴荣, 孙玉玺, 李颖, 张冬红, 郭冬梅 . (2017). 叙事护理教学对护理本科生精神病公众污名影响的研究. 临床心身疾病杂志, 23(3), 146-148.] | |
[94] | Wei Y., McGrath P. J., Hayden J., & Kutcher S . (2016). Measurement properties of tools measuring mental health knowledge: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1), 297. |
[95] | Wong D. F. K., Lam A. Y. K., Poon A., & Chow A. Y. M. (2012). Gender differences in mental health literacy among Chinese-speaking Australians in Melbourne, Australia. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 58(2), 178-185. |
[96] | Wong D. F. K., Lau Y., Kwok S., Wong P., & Tori C . (2017). Evaluating the effectiveness of mental health first aid program for Chinese people in Hong Kong. Research on Social Work Practice, 27(1), 59-67. |
[97] | Wong D. F. K., & Xuesong H . (2011). Schizophrenia literacy among Chinese in Shanghai, China: A comparison with Chinese-speaking Australians in Melbourne and Chinese in Hong Kong. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 45(7), 524-531. |
[98] | Wu Q., Luo X., Chen S., Qi C., Long J., Xiong Y., ... Liu T . (2017). Mental health literacy survey of non-mental health professionals in six general hospitals in Hunan Province of China. PloS One, 12(7), e0180327. |
[99] | Xu Z., Huang F., Kösters M., & Rusch N . (2017a). Challenging mental health related stigma in China: Systematic review and meta-analysis. II. Interventions among people with mental illness. Psychiatry Research, 255, 457-464. |
[100] | Xu Z., Huang F., Kösters M., Staiger T., Becker T., Thornicroft G., & Rüsch N . (2018). Effectiveness of interventions to promote help-seeking for mental health problems: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 48(16), 2658-2667. |
[101] | Xu Z., Rüsch N., Huang F., & Koesters M . (2017b). Challenging mental health related stigma in China: systematic review and meta-analysis. I. Interventions among the general public. Psychiatry Research, 255, 449-456. |
[102] | Yamaguchi S., Foo J. C., Nishida A., Ogawa S., Togo F., & Sasaki T . (2019). Mental health literacy programs for school teachers: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 1-12. |
[103] | Yang L. H., Kleinman A., Link B. G., Phelan J. C., Lee S., ... Good B . (2007). Culture and stigma: Adding moral experience to stigma theory. Social Science and Medicine, 64(7), 1524-1535. |
[104] | Yang L. H., Lai G. Y., Tu M., Luo M., Wonpat-Borja A., Jackson V. W., ... Dixon L . (2014). A brief anti-stigma intervention for Chinese immigrant caregivers of individuals with psychosis: Adaptation and initial findings. Transcultural Psychiatry, 51(2), 139-157. |
[105] | Yang L. H., & Singla D. R . (2011). Use of indigenous cultural idioms by Chinese immigrant relatives for psychosis: Impacts on stigma and psychoeducational approaches. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 199(11), 872-878. |
[106] | Yu Y., Liu Z., Hu M., Liu H., Yang J. P., Zhou L., ... Xiao S . (2015). Mental health help-seeking intentions and preferences of rural Chinese adults. PloS One, 10(11), e141889. |
[107] | Zhang X . (2013). A baseline survey and its subsequent intervention study: The incidence of depression and the level of depression mental literacy among medical students (Unpublished master's dissertation). Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China. |
[ 张晓 . (2013). 医学生抑郁状态、抑郁障碍心理健康素养现状及其心理健康教育干预效果初探(硕士学位论文). 广西医科大学, 南宁.] |
相关文章 15
[1] | 江光荣, 李丹阳, 任志洪, 闫玉朋, 伍新春, 朱旭, 于丽霞, 夏勉, 李凤兰, 韦辉, 张衍, 赵春晓, 张琳. 中国国民心理健康素养的现状与特点[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(2): 182-198. |
[2] | 宋仕婕, 佐斌, 温芳芳, 谭潇. 群体认同对群际敏感效应及其行为表现的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(8): 993-1003. |
[3] | 金心怡,周冰欣,孟斐. 3岁幼儿的二级观点采择及合作互动的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(9): 1028-1039. |
[4] | 黄亮,杨雪,黄志华,王益文. 理解双人肢体运动表达的友好和敌对意图的ERP证据[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(5): 557-570. |
[5] | 黄飞,王昌成,石宽宽,阿巴拜克热·哈力克,李林鹏. 越多接触就越愿意接触?取决于效价与效能[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(11): 1256-1268. |
[6] | 金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 乌云特娜, 金祥忠. 暴力环境接触对大学生网络攻击行为的影响:反刍思维与网络道德的作用 *[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 1051-1060. |
[7] | 阎书昌. 晚清时期执权居士创制“心理(学)”一词的考察[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(8): 920-928. |
[8] | 郑晓明; 刘鑫. 互动公平对员工幸福感的影响:心理授权的中介作用与权力距离的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 693-709. |
[9] | 金翊翔,罗跃嘉. 中性词和负性词的纯粹接触效应[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(07): 739-748. |
[10] | 郭晓丽,江光荣,朱旭. 暴力电子游戏的短期脱敏效应:两种接触方式比较[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(03): 259-266. |
[11] | 胡金生,杨丽珠. 高低自我监控者在不同互动情境中的被洞悉错觉[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(01): 79-85. |
[12] | Gordon T. Harold,Katherine H. Shelton,Frances Rice,Jacky Boivin, Dale Hay,Marianne Van Den Bree,Anita Thapar. 分离遗传与环境对儿童发展的影响:介绍一个新颖的研究方法[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(10): 1124-1134. |
[13] | Richard J. Rose,Jaakko Kaprio. 遗传、环境和青少年的吸烟饮酒行为:芬兰双生子研究的回溯与前瞻[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(10): 1062-1072. |
[14] | 王燕,龙立荣,周浩,祖伟. 分配不公正下的退缩行为:程序公正和互动公正的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2007, 39(2): 335-342. |
[15] | 周浩,龙立荣,王燕,王忠军,吴怡,柯善玉. 分配公正、程序公正、互动公正影响效果的差异[J]. 心理学报, 2005, 37(05): 687-693. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4688