删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

单亲家庭儿童相对剥夺感与心理适应的循环作用关系:一项追踪研究

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

熊猛1,2, 刘若瑾1, 叶一舵3()
1长江大学教育与体育学院心理学系, 湖北 荆州 434023
2Department of Psychology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH89JZ, UK
3福建师范大学心理学院, 福州 350117
收稿日期:2019-10-12出版日期:2021-01-25发布日期:2020-11-24
通讯作者:叶一舵E-mail:yeyiduo@163.com

基金资助:* 全国教育科学规划教育部青年课题“处境不利儿童的相对剥夺感对其心理社会适应的影响机制及追踪研究”(EBA160408)

Reciprocal relations between relative deprivation and psychological adjustment among single-parent children in China: A longitudinal study

XIONG Meng1,2, LIU Ruojin1, YE Yiduo3()
1Department of Psychology, School of Educaiton and Sport Sciences, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434023, China
2Department of Psychology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH89JZ, UK
3School of Psychology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China
Received:2019-10-12Online:2021-01-25Published:2020-11-24
Contact:YE Yiduo E-mail:yeyiduo@163.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 本研究基于经典相对剥夺理论和发展情境理论, 采用纵向设计, 以湖北省某地区273名单亲家庭儿童为被试, 进行连续3次的追踪测查, 考察单亲家庭儿童相对剥夺感与心理适应的特点及其循环作用关系。结果发现: (1)单亲家庭男生的抑郁和孤独感水平比女生高; 贫困单亲家庭儿童的相对剥夺感、抑郁和孤独感水平比非贫困单亲家庭儿童高, 自尊水平比非贫困单亲家庭儿童低; (2)控制了性别、学段和家庭经济状况后, 在个体内水平上T1时的相对剥夺感显著负向预测T2时的心理适应, 进而显著负向预测T3时的相对剥夺感, 同时T2时的相对剥夺感也能显著负向预测T3时的心理适应; (3)相对剥夺感与心理适应的循环作用在不同家庭经济状况单亲儿童中存在显著差异, 贫困单亲家庭儿童的心理适应对其相对剥夺感的作用比非贫困单亲家庭儿童更大。可见, 单亲家庭儿童的相对剥夺感与心理适应存在循环作用关系, 即前测(Tn)的相对剥夺感会导致后测(Tn+1)的心理适应不良, 进而影响后测(Tn+2)的相对剥夺感, 研究结果对于单亲家庭儿童心理适应的干预具有一定启示意义。


表1各量表在3个时间点的纵向测量等值性检验结果
变量 Model χ2 df CFI TLI RMSEA 模型比较 Δχ2 Δdf p
相对剥夺 M1: 形态等值 240.16 106 0.95 0.94 0.07
M2: 弱等值性 256.99 115 0.95 0.94 0.06 M2-M1 16.83 9 >0.05
M3: 强等值性 265.87 124 0.94 0.93 0.06 M3-M2 8.88 9 >0.05
M4: 严格等值 280.63 135 0.93 0.93 0.06 M4-M3 14.76 11 >0.05
抑郁 M1: 形态等值 254.19 76 0.94 0.93 0.07
M2: 弱等值性 268.83 84 0.93 0.92 0.07 M2-M1 14.64 8 >0.05
M3: 强等值性 276.11 92 0.93 0.92 0.07 M3-M2 7.28 8 >0.05
M4: 严格等值 289.40 102 0.92 0.92 0.07 M4-M3 13.29 10 >0.05
孤独感 M1: 形态等值 276.33 82 0.93 0.93 0.07
M2: 弱等值性 292.76 91 0.93 0.92 0.07 M2-M1 16.43 9 >0.05
M3: 强等值性 301.03 100 0.93 0.92 0.07 M3-M2 8.27 9 >0.05
M4: 严格等值 313.44 111 0.92 0.91 0.07 M4-M3 12.41 11 >0.05
社交焦虑 M1: 形态等值 218.33 65 0.94 0.93 0.07
M2: 弱等值性 231.59 75 0.93 0.92 0.07 M2-M1 13.26 10 >0.05
M3: 强等值性 238.45 85 0.93 0.92 0.06 M3-M2 6.86 10 >0.05
M4: 严格等值 249.79 97 0.92 0.92 0.06 M4-M3 11.34 12 >0.05
自尊 M1: 形态等值 214.08 64 0.95 0.94 0.07
M2: 弱等值性 227.32 73 0.94 0.93 0.07 M2-M1 13.24 9 >0.05
M3: 强等值性 233.48 82 0.94 0.93 0.06 M3-M2 6.16 9 >0.05
M4: 严格等值 245.80 94 0.93 0.92 0.06 M4-M3 12.32 12 >0.05

表1各量表在3个时间点的纵向测量等值性检验结果
变量 Model χ2 df CFI TLI RMSEA 模型比较 Δχ2 Δdf p
相对剥夺 M1: 形态等值 240.16 106 0.95 0.94 0.07
M2: 弱等值性 256.99 115 0.95 0.94 0.06 M2-M1 16.83 9 >0.05
M3: 强等值性 265.87 124 0.94 0.93 0.06 M3-M2 8.88 9 >0.05
M4: 严格等值 280.63 135 0.93 0.93 0.06 M4-M3 14.76 11 >0.05
抑郁 M1: 形态等值 254.19 76 0.94 0.93 0.07
M2: 弱等值性 268.83 84 0.93 0.92 0.07 M2-M1 14.64 8 >0.05
M3: 强等值性 276.11 92 0.93 0.92 0.07 M3-M2 7.28 8 >0.05
M4: 严格等值 289.40 102 0.92 0.92 0.07 M4-M3 13.29 10 >0.05
孤独感 M1: 形态等值 276.33 82 0.93 0.93 0.07
M2: 弱等值性 292.76 91 0.93 0.92 0.07 M2-M1 16.43 9 >0.05
M3: 强等值性 301.03 100 0.93 0.92 0.07 M3-M2 8.27 9 >0.05
M4: 严格等值 313.44 111 0.92 0.91 0.07 M4-M3 12.41 11 >0.05
社交焦虑 M1: 形态等值 218.33 65 0.94 0.93 0.07
M2: 弱等值性 231.59 75 0.93 0.92 0.07 M2-M1 13.26 10 >0.05
M3: 强等值性 238.45 85 0.93 0.92 0.06 M3-M2 6.86 10 >0.05
M4: 严格等值 249.79 97 0.92 0.92 0.06 M4-M3 11.34 12 >0.05
自尊 M1: 形态等值 214.08 64 0.95 0.94 0.07
M2: 弱等值性 227.32 73 0.94 0.93 0.07 M2-M1 13.24 9 >0.05
M3: 强等值性 233.48 82 0.94 0.93 0.06 M3-M2 6.16 9 >0.05
M4: 严格等值 245.80 94 0.93 0.92 0.06 M4-M3 12.32 12 >0.05


表2单亲家庭儿童相对剥夺感和心理适应在各时间点的描述性统计(M ± SD)
变量 男生(n = 138) 女生(n = 135) 小学(n = 148) 初中(n = 125) 贫困家庭(n = 128) 非贫困家庭(n = 145)
T1相对剥夺 4.09 ± 0.95 3.93 ± 0.85 3.56 ± 0.94 3.78 ± 0.96 4.90 ± 0.43 3.79 ± 0.82
T1抑郁 1.95 ± 0.72 1.84 ± 0.57 1.81 ± 0.58 1.89 ± 0.46 2.41 ± 0.87 1.76 ± 0.50
T1孤独感 2.10 ± 0.83 1.81 ± 0.38 1.87 ± 0.65 1.99 ± 0.58 2.59 ± 0.65 1.77 ± 0.46
T1社交焦虑 1.10 ± 0.70 0.94 ± 0.63 0.94 ± 0.83 1.12 ± 0.65 1.34 ± 0.61 0.92 ± 0.64
T1自尊 2.62 ± 0.62 2.80 ± 0.35 2.78 ± 0.46 2.68 ± 0.36 2.42 ± 0.51 2.80 ± 0.43
T2相对剥夺 4.21 ± 0.79 3.74 ± 0.96 4.24 ± 1.11 4.06 ± 0.84 4.93 ± 0.64 3.58 ± 0.79
T2抑郁 2.09 ± 0.20 1.83 ± 0.22 2.00 ± 0.55 2.09 ± 0.41 1.96 ± 0.27 1.88 ± 0.24
T2孤独感 2.33 ± 0.35 2.06 ± 0.26 2.23 ± 0.47 2.21 ± 0.36 2.31 ± 0.51 2.07 ± 0.22
T2社会焦虑 1.20 ± 0.62 1.13 ± 0.62 0.91 ± 0.66 1.26 ± 0.67 1.34 ± 0.44 1.10 ± 0.64
T2自尊 2.63 ± 0.72 3.02 ± 0.35 2.69 ± 0.16 2.64 ± 0.26 2.26 ± 0.44 3.09 ± 0.32
T3相对剥夺 4.16 ± 0.81 3.78 ± 0.91 3.94 ± 0.94 3.77 ± 0.73 4.94 ± 0.69 3.68 ± 0.76
T3抑郁 2.31 ± 0.37 1.96 ± 0.35 2.36 ± 0.45 2.12 ± 0.30 2.38 ± 0.49 2.00 ± 0.34
T3孤独感 2.29 ± 0.43 2.01 ± 0.24 2.31 ± 0.34 2.12 ± 0.34 2.36 ± 0.58 2.05 ± 0.24
T3社会焦虑 1.51 ± 0.69 1.03 ± 0.68 1.13 ± 0.61 1.18 ± 0.68 1.70 ± 0.96 1.06 ± 0.62
T3自尊 2.60 ± 0.54 2.70 ± 0.46 2.86 ± 0.42 2.69 ± 0.22 2.38 ± 0.45 2.96 ± 0.46

表2单亲家庭儿童相对剥夺感和心理适应在各时间点的描述性统计(M ± SD)
变量 男生(n = 138) 女生(n = 135) 小学(n = 148) 初中(n = 125) 贫困家庭(n = 128) 非贫困家庭(n = 145)
T1相对剥夺 4.09 ± 0.95 3.93 ± 0.85 3.56 ± 0.94 3.78 ± 0.96 4.90 ± 0.43 3.79 ± 0.82
T1抑郁 1.95 ± 0.72 1.84 ± 0.57 1.81 ± 0.58 1.89 ± 0.46 2.41 ± 0.87 1.76 ± 0.50
T1孤独感 2.10 ± 0.83 1.81 ± 0.38 1.87 ± 0.65 1.99 ± 0.58 2.59 ± 0.65 1.77 ± 0.46
T1社交焦虑 1.10 ± 0.70 0.94 ± 0.63 0.94 ± 0.83 1.12 ± 0.65 1.34 ± 0.61 0.92 ± 0.64
T1自尊 2.62 ± 0.62 2.80 ± 0.35 2.78 ± 0.46 2.68 ± 0.36 2.42 ± 0.51 2.80 ± 0.43
T2相对剥夺 4.21 ± 0.79 3.74 ± 0.96 4.24 ± 1.11 4.06 ± 0.84 4.93 ± 0.64 3.58 ± 0.79
T2抑郁 2.09 ± 0.20 1.83 ± 0.22 2.00 ± 0.55 2.09 ± 0.41 1.96 ± 0.27 1.88 ± 0.24
T2孤独感 2.33 ± 0.35 2.06 ± 0.26 2.23 ± 0.47 2.21 ± 0.36 2.31 ± 0.51 2.07 ± 0.22
T2社会焦虑 1.20 ± 0.62 1.13 ± 0.62 0.91 ± 0.66 1.26 ± 0.67 1.34 ± 0.44 1.10 ± 0.64
T2自尊 2.63 ± 0.72 3.02 ± 0.35 2.69 ± 0.16 2.64 ± 0.26 2.26 ± 0.44 3.09 ± 0.32
T3相对剥夺 4.16 ± 0.81 3.78 ± 0.91 3.94 ± 0.94 3.77 ± 0.73 4.94 ± 0.69 3.68 ± 0.76
T3抑郁 2.31 ± 0.37 1.96 ± 0.35 2.36 ± 0.45 2.12 ± 0.30 2.38 ± 0.49 2.00 ± 0.34
T3孤独感 2.29 ± 0.43 2.01 ± 0.24 2.31 ± 0.34 2.12 ± 0.34 2.36 ± 0.58 2.05 ± 0.24
T3社会焦虑 1.51 ± 0.69 1.03 ± 0.68 1.13 ± 0.61 1.18 ± 0.68 1.70 ± 0.96 1.06 ± 0.62
T3自尊 2.60 ± 0.54 2.70 ± 0.46 2.86 ± 0.42 2.69 ± 0.22 2.38 ± 0.45 2.96 ± 0.46


表3T1→T3单亲家庭儿童相对剥夺感与心理适应各指标的相关分析
变量 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
1. T1相对剥夺 1
2. T1抑郁 0.53** 1
3. T1孤独感 0.53** 0.45** 1
4. T1社交焦虑 0.30* 0.60** 0.32* 1
5. T1自尊 -0.55** -0.64** -0.26* -0.52** 1
6. T2相对剥夺 0.64** 0.51** 0.42* 0.30* -0.40* 1
7. T2抑郁 0.26* 0.32* 0.27* 0.33* -0.35* 0.24* 1
8. T2孤独感 0.21* 0.24* 0.51** 0.38* -0.30* 0.28* 0.67** 1
9. T2社会焦虑 0.22* 0.52** 0.28* 0.71*** -0.37* 0.23* 0.37* 0.31* 1
10. T2自尊 -0.40* -0.53** -0.58** -0.45** 0.60** -0.41* -0.36* -0.54** -0.35* 1
11. T3相对剥夺 0.68** 0.64** 0.60** 0.46** -0.33* 0.83*** 0.33* 0.36* 0.50** -0.48** 1
12. T3抑郁 0.28* 0.40* 0.61** 0.34* -0.22* 0.23* 0.63** 0.67** 0.36* -0.52** 0.30* 1
13. T3孤独感 0.33* 0.42* 0.59** 0.37* 0.23* 0.29* 0.66** 0.80*** 0.25* -0.52** 0.28* 0.62** 1
14. T3社会焦虑 0.37* 0.61** 0.55** 0.65** -0.30* 0.30* 0.59** 0.46** 0.83*** -0.34* 0.49** 0.55** 0.53** 1
15. T3自尊 -0.58** -0.65** -0.47** -0.36* 0.60** -0.44* 0.46* -0.23* -0.25* 0.57** -0.35* -0.39* -0.24* -0.33*

表3T1→T3单亲家庭儿童相对剥夺感与心理适应各指标的相关分析
变量 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
1. T1相对剥夺 1
2. T1抑郁 0.53** 1
3. T1孤独感 0.53** 0.45** 1
4. T1社交焦虑 0.30* 0.60** 0.32* 1
5. T1自尊 -0.55** -0.64** -0.26* -0.52** 1
6. T2相对剥夺 0.64** 0.51** 0.42* 0.30* -0.40* 1
7. T2抑郁 0.26* 0.32* 0.27* 0.33* -0.35* 0.24* 1
8. T2孤独感 0.21* 0.24* 0.51** 0.38* -0.30* 0.28* 0.67** 1
9. T2社会焦虑 0.22* 0.52** 0.28* 0.71*** -0.37* 0.23* 0.37* 0.31* 1
10. T2自尊 -0.40* -0.53** -0.58** -0.45** 0.60** -0.41* -0.36* -0.54** -0.35* 1
11. T3相对剥夺 0.68** 0.64** 0.60** 0.46** -0.33* 0.83*** 0.33* 0.36* 0.50** -0.48** 1
12. T3抑郁 0.28* 0.40* 0.61** 0.34* -0.22* 0.23* 0.63** 0.67** 0.36* -0.52** 0.30* 1
13. T3孤独感 0.33* 0.42* 0.59** 0.37* 0.23* 0.29* 0.66** 0.80*** 0.25* -0.52** 0.28* 0.62** 1
14. T3社会焦虑 0.37* 0.61** 0.55** 0.65** -0.30* 0.30* 0.59** 0.46** 0.83*** -0.34* 0.49** 0.55** 0.53** 1
15. T3自尊 -0.58** -0.65** -0.47** -0.36* 0.60** -0.44* 0.46* -0.23* -0.25* 0.57** -0.35* -0.39* -0.24* -0.33*



图1单亲家庭儿童相对剥夺感与心理适应之间的随机截距交叉滞后效应模型 注: 为了使模型清晰可见, 我们对模型进行了简化, 将相对剥夺感和心理适应的指标进行打包处理, 分别由原来的4个指标形成1个指标, 各变量的测量模型的负荷值在图中也省略未报告; R表示个体间水平的潜变量(随机截距), C表示个体内水平的潜变量; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001。
图1单亲家庭儿童相对剥夺感与心理适应之间的随机截距交叉滞后效应模型 注: 为了使模型清晰可见, 我们对模型进行了简化, 将相对剥夺感和心理适应的指标进行打包处理, 分别由原来的4个指标形成1个指标, 各变量的测量模型的负荷值在图中也省略未报告; R表示个体间水平的潜变量(随机截距), C表示个体内水平的潜变量; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001。


表4不同性别、学段和家庭经济状况单亲儿童在交叉滞后模型上的差异比较
变量 模型拟合 模型比较
χ2 df CFI TLI RMSEA 模型 Δχ2 Δdf p
性别
M1: 自由估计 327.33 72 0.94 0.93 0.06
M2: 限定交叉滞后路径相等 338.61 79 0.93 0.92 0.06 M2-M1 11.28 7 >0.05
学段
M1: 自由估计 315.42 74 0.93 0.92 0.05
M2: 限定交叉滞后路径相等 326.14 81 0.92 0.92 0.05 M2-M1 10.72 7 >0.05
家庭经济状况
M1: 自由估计 287.41 84 0.96 0.94 0.05
M2: 限定交叉滞后路径相等 306.79 92 0.95 0.94 0.05 M2-M1 19.38 8 <0.05

表4不同性别、学段和家庭经济状况单亲儿童在交叉滞后模型上的差异比较
变量 模型拟合 模型比较
χ2 df CFI TLI RMSEA 模型 Δχ2 Δdf p
性别
M1: 自由估计 327.33 72 0.94 0.93 0.06
M2: 限定交叉滞后路径相等 338.61 79 0.93 0.92 0.06 M2-M1 11.28 7 >0.05
学段
M1: 自由估计 315.42 74 0.93 0.92 0.05
M2: 限定交叉滞后路径相等 326.14 81 0.92 0.92 0.05 M2-M1 10.72 7 >0.05
家庭经济状况
M1: 自由估计 287.41 84 0.96 0.94 0.05
M2: 限定交叉滞后路径相等 306.79 92 0.95 0.94 0.05 M2-M1 19.38 8 <0.05







[1] Asher, S. R., Hymel, S., & Renshaw, P. D. (1984). Loneliness in children. Child Development, 55(4), 1456-1464.
[2] Barajas, M. S. (2011). Academic achievement of children in single parent homes: A critical review. The Hilltop Review, 5(1), 13-21.
[3] Barrera, M. (1988). Models of social support and life stress: Beyond the buffering hypothesis. In L. H. Cohen (Ed.), Life events and psychological functioning: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 211-236). Sage.
[4] Berry, D., & Willoughby, M. T. (2017). On the practical interpretability of cross-lagged panel models: Rethinking a developmental workhorse. Child Development, 88(4), 1186-1206.
URLpmid: 27878996
[5] Beshai, S., Mishra, S., Meadows, T. J. S., Parmar, P., & Huang, V. (2017). Minding the gap: Subjective relative deprivation and depressive symptoms. Social Science & Medicine, 173, 18-25.
URLpmid: 27914314
[6] Brody, G. H., Murry, V. M., Kim, S., & Brown, A. C. (2002). Longitudinal pathways to competence and psychological adjustment among African American children living in rural single-parent households. Child Development, 73(5), 1505-1516.
URLpmid: 12361315
[7] Callan, M. J., Kim, H., Gheorghiu, A. I., & Matthews, W. J. (2017). The interrelations between social class, personal relative deprivation, and prosociality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(6), 660-669.
URLpmid: 29081900
[8] Callan, M. J., Kim, H., & Matthews, W. J. (2015). Predicting self-rated mental and physical health: The contributions of subjective socioeconomic status and personal relative deprivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 14-15.
URLpmid: 25698987
[9] Chen, Z. Y., Yang, X. D., & Li, X. Y. (2009). Psychometric features of CES-D in Chinese adolescents. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 17(4), 443-445.
[ 陈祉妍, 杨小冬, 李新影. (2009). 流调中心抑郁量表在我国青少年中的试用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17(4), 443-445.]
[10] Cheng, C., Lau, H. P., & Chan, M. P. S.(2014). Coping flexibility and psychological adjustment to stressful life changes: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1582-1607.
URLpmid: 25222637
[11] Chinawa, J. M., Obu, H. A., Manyike, P. C., Obi, I. E., Isreal, O. O., & Chinawa, A. T. (2014). Self esteem among adolescents in Nigerian secondary schools: A neglected issue. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, 5(1), 98-106.
[12] Cojocaru, A. (2016). Does relative deprivation matter in developing countries: Evidence from six transition economies. Social Indicators Research, 125(3), 735-756.
[13] Cummings, E. M., Davies, P. T., & Campbell, S. B.(2000). New directions in the study of parenting and child development. In E. M. Cummings, P. T. Davies, & S. B. Campbell (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology and family process: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp.200-250). The Guilford Press.
[14] Ding, Y, Z. (2016). Let residents have a sense of gain must get through the last kilometer: The practical path of community governance innovation in the new era. National Governance, 1(2), 17-23.
[ 丁元竹. (2016). 让居民拥有获得感必须打通最后一公里 ——新时期社区治理创新的实践路径. 国家治理, 1(2), 17-23.]
[15] Eibner, C., Sturm, R., & Gresenz, C. R. (2004). Does relative deprivation predict the need for mental health services? The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economic, 7(4), 167-175.
[16] Feng, X. H., & Zhang, X. K. (2008). Researches about the relationships among pride, explicit self-esteem and depression in urban poverty adolescents. Psychological Development and Education, (4), 100-105.
[ 冯晓杭, 张向葵. (2008). 城市贫困中学生自豪感、外显自尊与抑郁状态的关系. 心理发展与教育, (4), 100-105.]
[17] Gunnarsdóttir, H., Hensing, G., Povlsen, L., & Petzold, M. (2016). Relative deprivation in the Nordic countries-child mental health problems in relation to parental financial stress. European Journal of Public Health, 26(2), 277-282.
URLpmid: 26490511
[18] Guo, H. Y., Chen, L. H., Ye, Z., Pan, J., & Lin, D. H. (2017). Characteristics of peer victimization and the bidirectional relationship between peer victimization and internalizing problems among rural-to-urban migrant children in China: A longitudinal study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(3), 336-348.
[ 郭海英, 陈丽华, 叶枝, 潘瑾, 林丹华. (2017). 流动儿童同伴侵害的特点及与内化问题的循环作用关系: 一项追踪研究. 心理学报, 49(3), 336-348.]
[19] Hai, Y. (2017). Survey on social adaptability of middle school students in divorced families and educational strategies. Theory and Practice of Education, 37(5), 17-19.
[ 海英. (2017). 离异家庭中学生社会适应性的调查及教育对策. 教育理论与实践, 37(5), 17-19.]
[20] Haimi, M., & Lerner. A. (2016). The impact of parental separation and divorce on the health status of children, and the ways to improve it. Journal of Clinical & Medical Genomics, 4(1), 137-143.
[21] Hamaker, E. L., Kuipers, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102-116.
doi: 10.1037/a0038889URLpmid: 25822208
[22] Han, L., Ren, Y. Q., Xue, W. W., & Gao, F. Q. (2017). Self- esteem and aggression: The multiple mediating effects of relative deprivation and perceived social support. Chinese Journal of Special Education, (2), 84-89.
[ 韩磊, 任跃强, 薛雯雯, 高峰强. (2017). 自尊与攻击: 相对剥夺感和领悟社会支持的多重中介作用. 中国特殊教育, (2), 84-89.]
[23] Hetherington, M. E., Margaret, B., & Glendessa, M. I. (1998). What matters? What does not? Five perspectives on the association between marital transitions and children’s adjustment. American Psychologist, 53(2), 167-184.
[24] Hou, X. F., Mao, F. Q., Liang, R. H., Feng, X. J., Liu, X., Liu, H. W., & Liu, P. P. (2011). Survey and related analysis of parent-child mental health status in four types of single- parent families. Chinese Journal of School Health, 32(6), 641-645.
[ 侯筱菲, 毛富强, 梁瑞华, 冯秀娟, 刘霞, 刘宏伟, 刘佩佩. (2011). 4种类型单亲家庭亲子心理健康状况分析. 中国学校卫生, 32(6), 641-645.]
[25] Jia, X. B. (2001). The nature and mechanism of mental adaptation. Journal of Tianjin Normal University (Social Science), (1), 19-23.
[ 贾晓波. (2001). 心理适应的本质与机制. 天津师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 19-23.]
[26] Ladd, G. W., & Troop-Gordon, W. (2003). The role of chronic peer difficulties in the development of children’s psychological adjustment problems. Child Development, 74(5), 1344-1367.
URLpmid: 14552402
[27] La Greca, A. M., Dandes, S. K., Wick, P., Shaw, K., & Stone, W. L. (1988). Development of the social anxiety scale for children: Reliability and concurrent validity. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 17(1), 84-91.
[28] Lerner, R. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Editors-in-chief) and R. M. Lerner (vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp.1-17, 43-61, 542-548). Wiley.
[29] Lerner, R. M., & Miller, J. R. (1993). Integrating human development research and intervention for America's children: The Michigan State University model. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 14(3), 347-364.
[30] Li, Y. D. (2015). Research on the causes and countermeasures of the crime of juveniles from single parent families (Unpublished master dissertation). Southwest University of Political Science & Law, Chongqing, China.
[ 李奕锭. (2015). 单亲家庭未成年人犯罪成因及对策研究(硕士学位论文). 西南政法大学, 重庆.]
[31] Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 151-173.
[32] Liu, J. S., Zhou, Y., Li, D., & Chen, X. Y. (2015). Relations between preference for solitude and psychological adjustment in middle childhood and early adolescence: A moderated mediating model. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(8), 1004-1012.
[ 刘俊升, 周颖, 李丹, 陈欣银. (2015). 儿童中期和青春期早期独处偏好与心理适应之关系: 有调节的中介效应. 心理学报, 47(8), 1004-1012.]
[33] Liu, P.(1999). Children loneliness scale . In X. D. Wang, X. L. Wang, & H. Ma (Eds.), Handbook of rating scale for mental health (Revised edition, pp.303-305). Chinese Mental Health Journal Press.
[ 刘平. (1999). 儿童孤独量表. 见汪向东王希林, 马弘 (编). 心理卫生评定量表手册 (增订版, pp. 303-305). 中国心理卫生杂志社.]
[34] Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541-572.
[35] Ma, H. (1999). Social anxiety scale for children. In X. D. Wang, X. L. Wang, & H. Ma (Eds.), Handbook of rating scale for mental health (Revised edition, pp.248-249). Chinese Mental Health Journal Press.
[ 马弘. (1999). 儿童社交焦虑量表. 见汪向东, 王希林, 马弘 (编). 心理卫生评定量表手册 (增订版, pp. 248-249). 中国心理卫生杂志社.]
[36] Masselink, M., van Roekel, E., Hankin, B. L., Keijsers, L., Lodder, G. M. A., Vanhalst, J., … Oldehinkel, A. J. (2018). The longitudinal association between self-esteem and depressive symptoms in adolescents: Separating between- person effects from within-person effects. European Journal of Personality, 32(6), 653-671.
URLpmid: 31105382
[37] Ministry of Civil Affairs of the People's Republic of China. (2018). Statistical bulletin on the development of civil affairs in 2017. Retrieved 2018-08-02, from http://www. mca.gov.cn/article/sj/tjgb/2017/201708021607.pdf
[ 中华人民共和国民政部. (2018). 2017年社会服务发展统计公报. 2018-08-02取自 http://www.mca.gov.cn/article/sj/ tjgb/2017/201708021607.pdf]
[38] Mishra, S., & Carleton, R. N. (2015). Subjective relative deprivation is associated with poorer physical and mental health. Social Science & Medicine, 147, 144-149.
URLpmid: 26575605
[39] Moreira, J. F. G., & Telzer, E. H. (2015). Changes in family cohesion and links to depression during the college transition. Journal of Adolescence, 43, 72-82.
URLpmid: 26058003
[40] Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 229-245.
URLpmid: 10074707
[41] Perales, F., Johnson, S. E., Baxter, J., Lawrence, D., & Zubrick, S. R. (2017). Family structure and childhood mental disorders: New findings from Australia. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 52, 423-433.
doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1328-yURLpmid: 28040827
[42] Pettigrew, T. F. (2015). Samuel Stouffer and relative deprivation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78(1), 7-24.
[43] Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385-401.
[44] Rosenberg, M. (1965). Self-esteem scale. In X. D. Wang, X. L. Wang, & H. Ma (Eds.), Handbook of rating scale for mental health (Revised edition, pp. 318-320). Chinese Mental Health Journal Press.
[ Rosenberg, M. (1965). 自尊量表.见汪向东 , 王希林, 马弘 (编). 心理卫生评定量表手册 (增订版, pp. 318-320). 中国心理卫生杂志社.]
[45] Saito, M., Kondo, K., Kondo, N., Abe, A., Ojima, T., & Suzuki, K. (2014). Relative deprivation, poverty, and subjective health: JAGES cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 9(10):e111169.
URLpmid: 25350284
[46] Schmitt, M., Maes, J., & Widaman, K. (2010). Longitudinal effects of egoistic and fraternal relative deprivation on well-being and protest. International Journal of Psychology, 45(2), 122-130.
URLpmid: 22043892
[47] Shen, L. (2012). Children from poor one-parent-families' school adaptation and intervention of social work. Social Work, (12), 37-39.
[ 沈璐. (2012). 单亲贫困家庭子女学校适应问题与社会工作的介入策略——以安徽省某街道五户家庭子女为例. 社会工作, (12), 37-39.]
[48] Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (2014). Relative deprivation: How subjective experiences of inequality influence social behavior and health. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 231-238.
[49] Smith, H. J., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2015). Advances in relative deprivation theory and research. Social Justice Research, 28(1), 1-6.
[50] Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203-232.
URLpmid: 22194251
[51] Sorell, G. T., SoRelle-Miner, D. A., & Pausé, C. J. (2007). Moving on: The challenges of dynamic systems perspectives. Human Development, 50, 160-164.
[52] Starr, C. R., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2017). Sandra Bem's gender schema theory after 34 years: A review of its reach and impact. Sex Roles, 76(9-10), 566-578.
[53] Sun, D. Y., & Guo, Y. Y. (2016). Relative deprivation: Wanting, deserving, resentment for not having. Journal of Psychological Science, 39(3), 714-719.
[ 孙灯勇, 郭永玉. (2016). 相对剥夺感: 想得、应得、怨愤于未得. 心理科学, 39(3), 714-719.]
[54] Taylor, S. E., Lerner, J. S., Sherman, D. K., Sage, R. M., & Mcdowell, N. K. (2003). Portrait of the self-enhancer: Well adjusted and well liked or maladjusted and friendless? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 165-176.
URLpmid: 12518977
[55] Tebeka, S., Hoertel, N., Dubertret, C., & Strat, Y. L. (2016). Parental divorce or death during childhood and adolescence and its association with mental health. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 204(9), 678-685.
URLpmid: 27356119
[56] Tian, L. M. (2006). Shortcoming and merits of Chinese version of Rosenberg (1965) self-esteem scale. Psychological Exploration, 26(2), 88-91.
[ 田录梅. (2006). Rosenberg (1965)自尊量表中文版的美中不足. 心理学探新, 26(2), 88-91.]
[57] Weaver, J. M., & Schofield, T. J. (2015). Mediation and moderation of divorce effects on children’s behavior problems. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(1), 39-48.
[58] Wu, Y. X., Wang, P., & Du, S. J. (2018). The changing Chinese family structure and adolescent development. Social Sciences in China, (2), 98-120.
[ 吴愈晓, 王鹏, 杜思佳. (2018). 变迁中的中国家庭结构与青少年发展. 中国社会科学, (2), 98-120.]
[59] Xiong, M. (2015). Relative deprivation of migrant children: Characteristics, influencing factors and mechanisms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China.
[ 熊猛. (2015). 流动儿童相对剥夺感: 特点、影响因素与作用机制 (博士学位论文). 福建师范大学, 福州.]
[60] Xiong, M., Ma, J. P., & Ye, Y. D. (2020). Effects of relative deprivation on divorced children’s depression: A moderated mediating model. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(3), 523-527.
[ 熊猛, 马建平, 叶一舵. (2020). 相对剥夺感对离异家庭儿童抑郁的影响: 一个有调节的中介模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 28(3), 523-527.]
[61] Xiong, M., & Ye, Y. D. (2016). The concept, measurement, influencing factors and effects of relative deprivation. Advances in Psychological Science, 24(3), 438-453.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00438URL
[ 熊猛, 叶一舵. (2016). 相对剥夺感: 概念、测量、影响因素及作用. 心理科学进展, 24(3), 438-453.]
[62] Zhang, J., & Tao, M. K. (2013). Relative deprivation and psychopathology of Chinese college students. Journal of Affective Disorders, 150(3), 903-907.
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.013URL
[63] Zhang, S. W., Wang, E. P., & Chen, Y. W. (2011). Relative deprivation based on occupation: An effective predictor of Chinese life satisfaction. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 14(2), 148-158.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01338.xURL
[64] Zhou, H., & Long, L. R. (2004). Statistical remedies for common method biases. Advances in Psychological Science, 12(6), 942-950.
[ 周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.]
[65] Zhou, Y., & Liu, J. S. (2015). Relations between shyness and psychological adjustment among grades 3~8 students: Examining a mediated moderation model. Journal of Psychological Science, 38(4), 861-869.
[ 周颖, 刘俊升. (2015). 3~8年级学生羞怯与心理适应之关系: 一个有中介的调节模型检验. 心理科学, 38(4), 861-869.]
[66] Zhu, L. (2006). The problems and educational strategies of children’s social development in single parent families (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Nanjing Normal University, China.
[ 朱玲. (2006). 单亲家庭儿童社会性发展的问题及教育对策(博士学位论文). 南京师范大学.]




[1]丁倩, 唐云, 魏华, 张永欣, 周宗奎. 相对剥夺感与大学生网络游戏成瘾的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 1041-1050.
[2]郭海英;陈丽华; 叶枝;潘瑾;林丹华. 流动儿童同伴侵害的特点及与内化问题的循环作用关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(3): 336-348.
[3]刘俊升;周颖;李丹;陈欣银. 儿童中期和青春期早期独处偏好与心理适应之关系:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(8): 1004-1012.
[4]赵景欣;刘霞;张文新. 同伴拒绝、同伴接纳与农村留守儿童的心理适应:亲子亲合与逆境信念的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(7): 797-810 .
[5]马皑. 相对剥夺感与社会适应方式:中介效应和调节效应[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(3): 377-387.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4859
相关话题/心理 指标 社会 测量 检验