删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

无关工作记忆表征的负性情绪信息能否捕获视觉注意?一项眼动研究

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

黄月胜1(), 张豹2(), 范兴华1, 黄杰1
1湖南第一师范学院教育科学学院/儿童心理发育与脑认知科学湖南省重点实验室, 长沙 410205
2广州大学教育学院/心理与脑科学研究中心, 广州 510006
收稿日期:2019-10-08出版日期:2021-01-25发布日期:2020-11-24
通讯作者:黄月胜,张豹E-mail:huangys@hnfnu.edu.cn;bao.zhang@foxmail.com

基金资助:* 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(15YJC190007);湖南省重点实验室项目(2019TP032);广州大学青年拔尖人才计划项目(BJ201720)

Can negative emotion of task-irrelevant working memory representation affect its attentional capture? A study of eye movements

HUANG Yuesheng1(), ZHANG Bao2(), FAN Xinhua1, HUANG Jie1
1School of Educational Science / Hunan Key Laboratory of Children’s Psychological Development and Brain Cognitive Science, Hunan First Normal University, Changsha 410205, China
2School of Education / The Center for Mind and Brain, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Received:2019-10-08Online:2021-01-25Published:2020-11-24
Contact:HUANG Yuesheng,ZHANG Bao E-mail:huangys@hnfnu.edu.cn;bao.zhang@foxmail.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 研究通过分析视觉搜索任务的首次注视点和行为反应时, 探讨无关工作记忆表征的负性情绪信息对视觉注意选择的影响。实验1发现在反映早期注意选择的首次注视点百分率指标上, 不管工作记忆表征的情绪效价如何, 均出现了显著的注意捕获效应; 实验2发现当采用中性情绪靶子刺激时, 首次注视点百分率指标上仍表现出了稳健的注意捕获效应; 在首次注视点持续时间指标上, 实验1和实验2均发现记忆匹配条件的干扰刺激显著小于控制条件的干扰刺激, 表现出注意的快速脱离; 而在行为反应时指标上, 早期的注意捕获效应消失(实验1), 甚至被反转为注意抑制效应(实验2)。这些结果表明在早期注意选择阶段, 记忆驱动的注意捕获效应不受工作记忆表征情绪效价的影响, 但认知控制会在早期注意捕获之后促使注意快速脱离记忆匹配的干扰刺激, 其作用效果受靶子刺激情绪效价的调节。


表1实验1各类别图片的情绪维度评分(M ± SD)及差异检验
情绪维度 记忆刺激 干扰刺激 靶子刺激 记忆探测新刺激 F p
负性 效价 2.65 ± 0.42 2.64 ± 0.47 2.59 ± 0.48 2.59 ± 0.44 0.23 0.87
唤醒度 5.49 ± 0.46 5.54 ± 0.40 5.61 ± 0.41 5.63 ± 0.45 0.89 0.45
动机程度 3.62 ± 0.62 3.58 ± 0.57 3.47 ± 0.62 3.44 ± 0.78 0.77 0.51
中性 效价 5.20 ± 0.39 5.11 ± 0.36 5.13 ± 0.39 5.24 ± 0.47 0.71 0.55
唤醒度 3.45 ± 0.38 3.35 ± 0.37 3.40 ± 0.41 3.16 ± 0.46 1.91 0.13
动机程度 5.00 ± 0.62 5.02 ± 0.61 4.93 ± 0.65 4.98 ± 0.63 0.16 0.93

表1实验1各类别图片的情绪维度评分(M ± SD)及差异检验
情绪维度 记忆刺激 干扰刺激 靶子刺激 记忆探测新刺激 F p
负性 效价 2.65 ± 0.42 2.64 ± 0.47 2.59 ± 0.48 2.59 ± 0.44 0.23 0.87
唤醒度 5.49 ± 0.46 5.54 ± 0.40 5.61 ± 0.41 5.63 ± 0.45 0.89 0.45
动机程度 3.62 ± 0.62 3.58 ± 0.57 3.47 ± 0.62 3.44 ± 0.78 0.77 0.51
中性 效价 5.20 ± 0.39 5.11 ± 0.36 5.13 ± 0.39 5.24 ± 0.47 0.71 0.55
唤醒度 3.45 ± 0.38 3.35 ± 0.37 3.40 ± 0.41 3.16 ± 0.46 1.91 0.13
动机程度 5.00 ± 0.62 5.02 ± 0.61 4.93 ± 0.65 4.98 ± 0.63 0.16 0.93



图1实验流程图
图1实验流程图



图2实验1视觉搜索任务的反应时和干扰刺激捕获首次注视点百分率 注:图中条形图为首次注视点百分率, 折线图为反应时, 误差线为标准误。下同。
图2实验1视觉搜索任务的反应时和干扰刺激捕获首次注视点百分率 注:图中条形图为首次注视点百分率, 折线图为反应时, 误差线为标准误。下同。



图3实验2视觉搜索任务的反应时和干扰刺激捕获首次注视点百分率
图3实验2视觉搜索任务的反应时和干扰刺激捕获首次注视点百分率







[1] Attar, C. H., & Müller, M. M. (2012). Selective attention to task-irrelevant emotional distractors is unaffected by the perceptual load associated with a foreground task. PLoS One, 7(5), e37186.
URLpmid: 22649513
[2] Bahle, B., Beck, V. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2018). The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(7), 992-1011.
URLpmid: 29629781
[3] Bai, L., Ma, H., Huang, Y. X., & Luo, Y. J. (2005). The development of native Chinese affective picture system: A pretest in 46 college students. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 19(11), 719-722.
[ 白露, 马慧, 黄宇霞, 罗跃嘉. (2005). 中国情绪图片系统的编制——在 46 名中国大学生中的试用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 19(11), 719-722.]
[4] Baluch, F., & Itti, L. (2011). Mechanisms of top-down attention. Trends in Neurosciences, 34(4), 210-224.
[5] Borg, C., Leroy, N., Favre, E., Laurent, B., & Thomas-Antérion, C. (2011). How emotional pictures influence visuospatial binding in short-term memory in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease? Brain and Cognition, 76(1), 20-25.
URLpmid: 21481999
[6] Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2011a). Automatic and strategic effects in the guidance of attention by working memory representations. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 217-225.
[7] Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2011b). When memory is not enough: Electrophysiological evidence for goal-dependent use of working memory representations in guiding visual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 2650-2664.
URLpmid: 21254796
[8] Catarino, A., Küpper, C. S., Werner-Seidler, A., Dalgleish, T., & Anderson, M. C. (2015). Failing to forget: Inhibitory- control deficits compromise memory suppression in posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Science, 26(5), 604-616.
URLpmid: 25847536
[9] Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193-222.
[10] Dowd, E. W., Kiyonaga, A., Egner, T., & Mitroff, S. R. (2015). Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: An individual-differences approach. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 77(3), 704-712.
[11] Erthal, F. S., de Oliveira, L., Mocaiber, I., Pereira, M. G., Machado-Pinheiro, W., Volchan, E., & Pessoa, L. (2005). Load-dependent modulation of affective picture processing. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(4), 388-395.
[12] Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
URLpmid: 17695343
[13] Fawcett, J. M., Benoit, R. G., Gagnepain, P., Salman, A., Bartholdy, S., Bradley, C., … Anderson, M. C.(2015). The origins of repetitive thought in rumination: Separating cognitive style from deficits in inhibitory control over memory. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 47, 1-8.
URLpmid: 25462596
[14] Garrison, K. E., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2019). Effects of emotional content on working memory capacity. Cognition and Emotion, 33(2), 370-377.
URLpmid: 29436924
[15] Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018). The role of inhibition in avoiding distraction by salient stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 79-92.
URLpmid: 29191511
[16] Gayet, S., Paffen, C. L. E., Belopolsky, A. V., Theeuwes, J., & van der Stigchel, S.(2016). Visual input signaling threat gains preferential access to awareness in a breaking continuous flash suppression paradigm. Cognition, 149, 77-83.
URLpmid: 26807500
[17] Gray, K. L. H., Adams, W. J., Hedger, N., Newton, K. E., & Garner, M. (2013). Faces and awareness: Low-level, not emotional factors determine perceptual dominance. Emotion, 13(3), 537-544.
URLpmid: 23398580
[18] Grecucci, A., Soto, D., Rumiati, R. I., Humphreys, G. W., & Rotshtein, P. (2010). The interrelations between verbal working memory and visual selection of emotional faces. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(6), 1189-1200.
URLpmid: 19445604
[19] Gupta, R., Hur, Y., & Lavie, N. (2016). Distracted by pleasure: Effects of positive versus negative valence on emotional capture under load. Emotion, 16(3), 328-337.
URLpmid: 26479771
[20] Han, S. W., & Kim, M. (2009). Do the contents of working memory capture attention? Yes, but cognitive control matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1292-1302.
URLpmid: 19803637
[21] Hu, Y. M., Zhang, M., Xu, Z., & Li, B. Q. (2013). Guidance of working memory on attention: The effects of inhibition incentive. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45(2), 127-138.
[ 胡艳梅, 张明, 徐展, 李毕琴. (2013). 客体工作记忆对注意的导向作用: 抑制动机的影响. 心理学报, 45(2), 127-138.]
[22] Huang, J., Zhou, R., & Hu, S. (2013). Effects on automatic attention due to exposure to pictures of emotional faces while performing Chinese word judgment tasks. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e75386.
URLpmid: 24124486
[23] Joormann, J., Hertel, P. T., LeMoult, J., & Gotlib, I. H. (2009). Training forgetting of negative material in depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118(1), 34-43.
URLpmid: 19222312
[24] Kvavilashvili, L. (2014). Solving the mystery of intrusive flashbacks in posttraumatic stress disorder: Comment on Brewin (2014). Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 98-104.
URLpmid: 24364748
[25] Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8: University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
[26] Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(3), 451-468.
URLpmid: 7790827
[27] Lavie, N. (2010). Attention, distraction, and cognitive control under load. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(3), 143-148.
[28] Marzi, T., Regina, A., & Righi, S. (2014). Emotions shape memory suppression in trait anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1-10.
URLpmid: 23382719
[29] Masson, M. E. J. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679-690.
URLpmid: 21302025
[30] McHugo, M., Olatunji, B. O., & Zald, D. H. (2013). The emotional attentional blink: What we know so far. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(3), 151.
[31] Moher, J., & Egeth, H. E. (2012). The ignoring paradox: Cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(8), 1590-1605.
[32] Moriya, J., Koster, E. H. W., & de Raedt, R. (2014). The influence of working memory on visual search for emotional facial expressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(5), 1874-1890.
URLpmid: 24999613
[33] Nasrallah, M., Carmel, D., & Lavie, N. (2009). Murder, she wrote: Enhanced sensitivity to negative word valence. Emotion, 9(5), 609-618.
URLpmid: 19803583
[34] Nummenmaa, L., Hy?n?, J., & Calvo, M. G. (2009). Emotional scene content drives the saccade generation system reflexively. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 305-323.
[35] Oei, N. Y. L., Veer, I. M., Wolf, O. T., Spinhoven, P., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Elzinga, B. M. (2012). Stress shifts brain activation towards ventral 'affective' areas during emotional distraction. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(4), 403-412.
URLpmid: 21498384
[36] Okon-Singer, H., Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. (2007). Distinguishing between automaticity and attention in the processing of emotionally significant stimuli. Emotion, 7(1), 147-157.
URLpmid: 17352570
[37] Olivers, C. N. L., Meijer, F., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1243-1265.
URLpmid: 17002535
[38] Padmala, S., Sambuco, N., Codispoti, M., & Pessoa, L. (2018). Attentional capture by simultaneous pleasant and unpleasant emotional distractors. Emotion, Advance online publication.
URLpmid: 33252935
[39] Pan, Y . (2010). Content-based working memory-driven visual attention. Advances in Psychological Science, 18 (2), 210-219.
[ 潘毅. (2010). 基于工作记忆内容的视觉注意. 心理科学进展, 18(2), 210-219.]
[40] Pessoa, L., McKenna, M., Gutierrez, E., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2002). Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(17), 11458-11463.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.172403899URLpmid: 12177449
[41] Pourtois, G., Schwartz, S., Seghier, M. L., Lazeyras, F., & Vuilleumier, P. (2006). Neural systems for orienting attention to the location of threat signals: An event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage, 31(2), 920-933.
URLpmid: 16487729
[42] Raftery, A. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. In M. P. V.(Ed.), Sociological Methodology
URLpmid: 24307746
[43] Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2011). Active suppression of distractors that match the contents of visual working memory. Visual Cognition, 19(7), 956-972.
URLpmid: 22053147
[44] Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Blanco, M. J. (2005). Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(2), 248-261.
URLpmid: 15826228
[45] Soto, D., Hodsoll, J., Rotshtein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Automatic guidance of attention from working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(9), 342-348.
URLpmid: 18693131
[46] Soto, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Rotshtein, P. (2007). Dissociating the neural mechanisms of memory-based guidance of visual selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of the United States of America, 104(43), 17186-17191.
[47] Sutherland, M. R., McQuiggan, D. A., Ryan, J. D., & Mather, M. (2017). Perceptual salience does not influence emotional arousal’s impairing effects on top-down attention. Emotion, 17(4), 700-706.
URLpmid: 28080087
[48] Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 77-99.
URLpmid: 20507828
[49] Theeuwes, J. (2012). Automatic control of visual selection. In M. D. Dodd & J. H. Flowers (Eds.), Influence of attention, learning, and motivation on visual search(pp. 23-62). New York: Springer.
[50] van Schie, K., & Anderson, M. C. (2017). Successfully controlling intrusive memories is harder when control must be sustained. Memory, 25(9), 1201-1216.
URLpmid: 28276978
[51] Vogt, J., Koster, E. H. W., & de Houwer, J. (2017). Safety first: Instrumentality for reaching safety determines attention allocation under threat. Emotion, 17(3), 528-537.
URLpmid: 27869466
[52] Vuilleumier, P., & Huang, Y. (2009). Emotional attention: Uncovering the mechanisms of affective biases in perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 148-152.
[53] Wang, X. D., Wang, X. L., & Ma, H.(Eds.)(1999). Rating scales for mental health. Beijing: Chinese Mental Health Journal Press.
[ 汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. (1999). 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版). 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社.]
[54] Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2007). Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(2), 363-377.
URLpmid: 17469973
[55] Yang, W. H., Wu, D. J., & Peng, F. (2012). Application of Chinese version of Beck depression inventory-II to Chinese first-year college students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20(6), 762-764.
[ 杨文辉, 吴多进, 彭芳. (2012). 贝克抑郁量表第2版中文版在大一学生中的试用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 20(6), 762-764.]
[56] Yuan, J. J., Long, Q. S., Ding, N. X., Lou, Y. X., Liu, Y. Y., & Yang, J. M. (2015). Suppression dampens unpleasant emotion faster than reappraisal: Neural dynamics in a Chinese sample. Science China: Life Sciences, 58(5), 480-491.
URLpmid: 25316046
[ 袁加锦, 龙泉杉, 丁南翔, 娄熠雪, 刘莹莹, 杨洁敏. (2014). 负性情绪调节的效率:中国文化背景下认知重评与表达抑制的对比. 中国科学:生命科学, 44(6), 602-613.]
pmid: 25316046
[57] Zhan, M., Hortensius, R., & de Gelder, B. (2015). The body as a tool for anger awareness—differential effects of angry facial and bodily expressions on suppression from awareness. PLoS One, 10(10), e139768.
[58] Zhang, B., Hu, C. L., Chen, Y. Z., Miao, S. M., & Huang, S. (2017). The modulation of working memory load and perceptual load on attentional guidance from representations of working memory. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(8), 1009-1021.
[ 张豹, 胡岑楼, 陈颜璋, 缪素媚, 黄赛. (2017). 工作记忆与知觉负载对工作记忆表征引导注意的调节. 心理学报, 49(8), 1009-1021.]
[59] Zhang, B., Hu, C. L., & Huang, S. (2016). What do eye movements reveal about the role of cognitive control in attention guidance from working memory representation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(9), 1105-1118.
[ 张豹, 胡岑楼, 黄赛. (2016). 认知控制在工作记忆表征引导注意中的作用: 来自眼动的证据. 心理学报, 48(9), 1105-1118.]
[60] Zhang, B & Huang, S. (2013). Mechanisms underlying the attentional guidance form working memory representations. Advances in Psychological Science, 21(9), 1578-1584.
[ 张豹, 黄赛. (2013). 工作记忆表征对视觉注意的引导机制. 心理科学进展, 21(9), 1578-1584.]
[61] Zhang, B., Liu, S. H., Doro, M., & Galfano, G. (2018). Attentional guidance from multiple working memory representations: Evidence from eye movements. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 13876.
[62] Zhang, X. L., Pang, Z. Y., Jiang, Y. P., Zhang, M., & Jiang, Y. (2018). Access to awareness is improved by affective learning. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(3), 253-259.
[ 张秀玲, 庞兆阳, 姜云鹏, 张明, 蒋毅. (2018). 情绪学习促进无意识信息进入意识. 心理学报, 50(3), 253-259.]




[1]张孟可, 李晴, 尹首航, 陈安涛. 冲突水平的变化诱发冲突适应[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(2): 128-138.
[2]孙岩, 吕娇娇, 兰帆, 张丽娜. 自我关注重评和情境关注重评情绪调节策略及对随后认知控制的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(12): 1393-1406.
[3]崔诣晨, 王沛, 崔亚娟. 知觉冲突印象形成的认知控制策略:以刻板化信息与反刻板化信息为例[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(10): 1157-1170.
[4]王宴庆,陈安涛,胡学平,尹首航. 奖赏通过增强信号监测提升认知控制[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(1): 48-57.
[5]潘东旎,王道湍,李雪冰. 基于手机APP的双维n-back训练的认知与情绪效益[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(10): 1105-1119.
[6]胡岑楼;张豹;黄赛. 无关长时记忆表征能否引导视觉注意选择?[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(5): 590-601.
[7]张豹;胡岑楼;黄赛. 认知控制在工作记忆表征引导注意中的作用:来自眼动的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(9): 1105-1118.
[8]刘聪;焦鲁;孙逊;王瑞明. 语言转换对非熟练双语者不同认知控制成分的即时影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(5): 472-481.
[9]王佳莹; 缴润凯; 张明. 任务设置影响负相容效应的机制 ——自上而下认知控制对阈下启动信息加工的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(11): 1370-1378.
[10]刘晓瑜;何朝丹;陈俊;邓沁丽. 熟练粤-普双言者的双言认知控制机制 ——来自双任务切换范式的行为研究证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(4): 439-454.
[11]窦伟伟;郑希付;杨慧芳;王俊芳;李悦;俄小天;陈倩倩. 认知分心的强度对创伤性信息加工的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(5): 656-665.
[12]徐雷;王丽君;赵远方;谭金凤;陈安涛. 阈下奖励调节认知控制的权衡[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(4): 459-466.
[13]王振宏;刘亚;蒋长好. 不同趋近动机强度积极情绪对认知控制的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(5): 546-555.
[14]刘志方,张智君,赵亚军. 汉语阅读中眼跳目标选择单元以及词汇加工方式:来自消失文本的实验证据[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(06): 608-618.
[15]赵俊华,莫雷. 非熟练中-英双语者英语句子语义通达的语境效应[J]. 心理学报, 2010, 42(09): 920-928.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4856
相关话题/心理 实验 控制 视觉 干扰