西南大学心理学部, 认知与人格教育部重点实验室, 重庆 400715
收稿日期:
2020-07-03出版日期:
2021-07-25发布日期:
2021-05-24通讯作者:
夏凌翔E-mail:xialx@swu.edu.cn基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究规划(19YJA190008)The mediating effect of aggression motivation on the relationship between trait anger and reactive aggression: A longitudinal study
LI Rui, XIA Ling-Xiang()Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality of Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400715, China
Received:
2020-07-03Online:
2021-07-25Published:
2021-05-24Contact:
XIA Ling-Xiang E-mail:xialx@swu.edu.cn摘要/Abstract
摘要: 特质愤怒是影响反应性攻击的重要人格因素, 反应性攻击的提出是基于攻击动机, 但是特质愤怒影响反应性攻击的动机机制尚不清楚。本研究假设特质愤怒可以通过增强反应性攻击的特异性动机(即敌意性动机)以及反应性攻击与主动性攻击的共同性动机(即道德准许动机)来纵向预测反应性攻击。为了检验该假设, 对5个省市共1007名大学生的特质愤怒、敌意归因偏向(代表敌意性动机)和道德推脱(代表道德准许动机)、反应性攻击与主动性攻击进行了3次追踪调查。结果显示:(1)在控制性别后, 第一个时间点的特质愤怒可以通过第二个时间点的敌意归因偏向和道德推脱预测第三个时间点的反应性攻击; (2)敌意归因偏向只能纵向预测反应性攻击, 而不能跨时间预测主动性攻击; (3)道德推脱可以纵向预测反应性攻击和主动性攻击。这一结果支持了特质愤怒影响反应性攻击的动机模型, 发展了人格与攻击关系的理论与研究, 对于揭示反应性攻击形成的动机机制具有积极作用。
图/表 2
表1特质愤怒、敌意归因偏向、道德推脱、反应性攻击、主动性攻击的平均数、标准差及相关
变量 | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. T1特质愤怒 | 1.65 | 0.40 | ||||||||||||||
2. T2特质愤怒 | 1.67 | 0.42 | 0.64** | |||||||||||||
3. T3特质愤怒 | 1.69 | 0.42 | 0.53** | 0.62** | ||||||||||||
4. T1敌意归因偏向 | 2.92 | 0.81 | 0.29** | 0.18** | 0.20** | |||||||||||
5. T2敌意归因偏向 | 2.88 | 0.81 | 0.27** | 0.33** | 0.28** | 0.55** | ||||||||||
6. T3敌意归因偏向 | 3.05 | 0.87 | 0.26** | 0.28** | 0.32** | 0.53** | 0.63** | |||||||||
7. T1道德推脱 | 1.71 | 0.48 | 0.32** | 0.23** | 0.23** | 0.27** | 0.28** | 0.24** | ||||||||
8. T2道德推脱 | 1.70 | 0.47 | 0.26** | 0.33** | 0.25** | 0.21** | 0.36** | 0.29** | 0.49** | |||||||
9. T3道德推脱 | 1.71 | 0.50 | 0.25** | 0.24** | 0.28** | 0.20** | 0.30** | 0.33** | 0.52** | 0.58** | ||||||
10. T1反应性攻击 | 2.76 | 0.89 | 0.58** | 0.42** | 0.38** | 0.32** | 0.27** | 0.28** | 0.41** | 0.25** | 0.27** | |||||
11. T2反应性攻击 | 2.42 | 0.89 | 0.47** | 0.57** | 0.45** | 0.24** | 0.40** | 0.36** | 0.35** | 0.43** | 0.32** | 0.59** | ||||
12. T3反应性攻击 | 2.38 | 0.88 | 0.35** | 0.42** | 0.49** | 0.24** | 0.34** | 0.45** | 0.35** | 0.37** | 0.45** | 0.51** | 0.62** | |||
13. T1主动性攻击 | 1.32 | 0.52 | 0.39** | 0.28** | 0.29** | 0.21** | 0.15** | 0.15** | 0.54** | 0.32** | 0.39** | 0.40** | 0.28** | 0.27** | ||
14. T2主动性攻击 | 1.38 | 0.63 | 0.25** | 0.47** | 0.24** | 0.16** | 0.25** | 0.17** | 0.33** | 0.62** | 0.34** | 0.17** | 0.47** | 0.25** | 0.46** | |
15. T3主动性攻击 | 1.40 | 0.65 | 0.20** | 0.27** | 0.32** | 0.14** | 0.14** | 0.22** | 0.32** | 0.32** | 0.55** | 0.17** | 0.23** | 0.48** | 0.42** | 0.44** |
表1特质愤怒、敌意归因偏向、道德推脱、反应性攻击、主动性攻击的平均数、标准差及相关
变量 | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. T1特质愤怒 | 1.65 | 0.40 | ||||||||||||||
2. T2特质愤怒 | 1.67 | 0.42 | 0.64** | |||||||||||||
3. T3特质愤怒 | 1.69 | 0.42 | 0.53** | 0.62** | ||||||||||||
4. T1敌意归因偏向 | 2.92 | 0.81 | 0.29** | 0.18** | 0.20** | |||||||||||
5. T2敌意归因偏向 | 2.88 | 0.81 | 0.27** | 0.33** | 0.28** | 0.55** | ||||||||||
6. T3敌意归因偏向 | 3.05 | 0.87 | 0.26** | 0.28** | 0.32** | 0.53** | 0.63** | |||||||||
7. T1道德推脱 | 1.71 | 0.48 | 0.32** | 0.23** | 0.23** | 0.27** | 0.28** | 0.24** | ||||||||
8. T2道德推脱 | 1.70 | 0.47 | 0.26** | 0.33** | 0.25** | 0.21** | 0.36** | 0.29** | 0.49** | |||||||
9. T3道德推脱 | 1.71 | 0.50 | 0.25** | 0.24** | 0.28** | 0.20** | 0.30** | 0.33** | 0.52** | 0.58** | ||||||
10. T1反应性攻击 | 2.76 | 0.89 | 0.58** | 0.42** | 0.38** | 0.32** | 0.27** | 0.28** | 0.41** | 0.25** | 0.27** | |||||
11. T2反应性攻击 | 2.42 | 0.89 | 0.47** | 0.57** | 0.45** | 0.24** | 0.40** | 0.36** | 0.35** | 0.43** | 0.32** | 0.59** | ||||
12. T3反应性攻击 | 2.38 | 0.88 | 0.35** | 0.42** | 0.49** | 0.24** | 0.34** | 0.45** | 0.35** | 0.37** | 0.45** | 0.51** | 0.62** | |||
13. T1主动性攻击 | 1.32 | 0.52 | 0.39** | 0.28** | 0.29** | 0.21** | 0.15** | 0.15** | 0.54** | 0.32** | 0.39** | 0.40** | 0.28** | 0.27** | ||
14. T2主动性攻击 | 1.38 | 0.63 | 0.25** | 0.47** | 0.24** | 0.16** | 0.25** | 0.17** | 0.33** | 0.62** | 0.34** | 0.17** | 0.47** | 0.25** | 0.46** | |
15. T3主动性攻击 | 1.40 | 0.65 | 0.20** | 0.27** | 0.32** | 0.14** | 0.14** | 0.22** | 0.32** | 0.32** | 0.55** | 0.17** | 0.23** | 0.48** | 0.42** | 0.44** |
图1特质愤怒、敌意归因偏向、道德推脱和反应性攻击的交叉滞后模型 注:仅呈现显著的标准化路径系数; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
图1特质愤怒、敌意归因偏向、道德推脱和反应性攻击的交叉滞后模型 注:仅呈现显著的标准化路径系数; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
参考文献 52
[1] | AlMoghrabi, N., Huijding, J., & Franken, I. H. (2018). The effects of a novel hostile interpretation bias modification paradigm on hostile interpretations, mood, and aggressive behavior. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 58, 36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.08.003URL |
[2] | Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(19), 27-51. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231URL |
[3] | Babcock, J. C., Tharp, A. L., Sharp, C., Heppner, W., & Stanford, M. S. (2014). Similarities and differences in impulsive/premeditated and reactive/proactive bimodal classifications of aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(3), 251-262. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2014.04.002URL |
[4] | Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193-209. pmid: 15661671 |
[5] | Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101-119. doi: 10.1080/0305724022014322URL |
[6] | Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., & Regalia, C. (2001). Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 125-135. pmid: 11195885 |
[7] | Bondü, R., & Richter, P. (2016). Interrelations of justice, rejection, provocation, and moral disgust sensitivity and their links with the hostile attribution bias, trait anger, and aggression. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-15. |
[8] | Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452-459. pmid: 1403624 |
[9] | Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Tramontano, C., & Barbaranelli, C. (2009). Assessing civic moral disengagement: Dimensionality and construct validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5), 504-509. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.027URL |
[10] | Caprara, G. V., Tisak, M. S., Alessandri, G., Fontaine, R. G., Fida, R., & Paciello, M. (2014). The contribution of moral disengagement in mediating individual tendencies toward aggression and violence. Developmental Psychology, 50(1), 71-85. doi: 10.1037/a0034488URL |
[11] | Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74-101. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74URL |
[12] | Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information- processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67(3), 993- 1002. |
[13] | Crick, N. R., & Nelson, D. A. (2002). Relational and physical victimization within friendships: Nobody told me there'd be friends like these. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30(6), 599-607. doi: 10.1023/A:1020811714064URL |
[14] | Dambacher, F., Schuhmann, T., Lobbestael, J., Arntz, A., Brugman, S., & Sack, A. T. (2015). Reducing proactive aggression through non-invasive brain stimulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(10), 1303-1309. |
[15] | Dillon, K. H., Allan, N. P., Cougle, J. R., & Fincham, F. D. (2016). Measuring hostile interpretation bias: The WSAP-hostility scale. Assessment, 23(6), 707-719. doi: 10.1177/1073191115599052URL |
[16] | Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information- processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children's peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1146-1158. |
[17] | Dodge, K. A., Malone, P. S., Lansford, J. E., Sorbring, E., Skinner, A. T., Tapanya, S., ... Pastorelli, C. (2015). Hostile attributional bias and aggressive behavior in global context. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(30), 9310-9315. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418572112URL |
[18] | Fang, J., & Wang, X. C. (2020). Association between callous-unemotional traits and cyberbullying in college students: The moderating effect of moral disengagement. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(2), 281-284. |
[方杰, 王兴超. (2020). 冷酷无情特质与大学生网络欺负行为的关系:道德推脱的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 28(2), 281-284.] | |
[19] | Ferguson, C. J., & Dyck, D. (2012). Paradigm change in aggression research: The time has come to retire the general aggression model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(3), 220-228. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.02.007URL |
[20] | Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol.2). Stanford University Press. |
[21] | Gagnon, J., Aubin, M., Emond, F. C., Derguy, S., Brochu, A. F., Bessette, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2016). An ERP study on hostile attribution bias in aggressive and nonaggressive individuals. Aggressive Behavior, 43(3), 217-229. doi: 10.1002/ab.v43.3URL |
[22] | Gagnon, J., & Rochat, L. (2017). Relationships between hostile attribution bias, negative urgency, and reactive aggression. Journal of Individual Differences, 38(4), 211-219. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000238URL |
[23] | Giancola, P. R. (2002). The influence of trait anger on the alcohol-aggression relation in men and women. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 26(9), 1350-1358. |
[24] | Hammock, G. S., Richardson, D. S., Williams, C., & Janit, A. S. (2015). Perceptions of psychological and physical aggression between heterosexual partners. Journal of Family Violence, 30, 13-26. doi: 10.1007/s10896-014-9645-yURL |
[25] | Hazebroek, J. F., Howells, K., & Day, A. (2001). Cognitive appraisals associated with high trait anger. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(1), 31-45. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00007-6URL |
[26] | Hou, L. L., Jang, Q., Wang, H. Z., & Li, C. Z. (2017). The relationship between trait anger and aggressive behavior: Based on the perspective of the integrative cognitive model. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(12), 1548-1558. |
[侯璐璐, 江琦, 王焕贞, 李长燃. (2017). 特质愤怒对攻击行为的影响:基于综合认知模型的视角. 心理学报, 49(12), 1548-1558.] | |
[27] | Hubbard, J. A., McAuliffe, M. D., Morrow, M. T., & Romano, L. J. (2010). Reactive and proactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: Precursors, outcomes, processes, experiences, and measurement. Journal of Personality, 78(1), 95-118. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00610.xpmid: 20433614 |
[28] | Hymel, S., Rocke-Henderson, N., & Bonanno, R. A. (2005). Moral disengagement: A framework for understanding bullying among adolescents. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 1-11. |
[29] | Lagerspetz, K. M. J., Björkqvist, K., Björkqvist, H., & Lundman, H. (1988). Moral approval of aggression and sex role identity in officer trainees, conscientious objectors to military service, and in a female reference group. Aggressive Behavior, 14(5), 303-313. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2337URL |
[30] | Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Westman, M. (1980). Moral approval of aggressive acts: A preliminary investigation. Aggressive Behavior, 6(2), 119-130. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2337URL |
[31] | Martinelli, A., Ackermann, K., Bernhard, A., Freitag, C. M., & Schwenck, C. (2018). Hostile attribution bias and aggression in children and adolescents: A systematic literature review on the influence of aggression subtype and gender. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 39, 25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2018.01.005URL |
[32] | Parrott, D. J., & Zeichner, A. (2002). Effects of alcohol and trait anger on physical aggression in men. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63(2), 196-204. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2002.63.196URL |
[33] | Perren, S., & Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, E. (2012). Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in adolescence: Differential roles of moral disengagement, moral emotions, and moral values. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 195-209. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2011.643168URL |
[34] | Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36(2), 81-94. doi: 10.1002/ab.20336URL |
[35] | Quan, F. Y., & Xia, L. X. (2019). The prediction of hostile attribution bias on reactive aggression and the mediating role of revenge motivation. Journal of Psychological Science, 42(6), 1434-1440. |
[权方英, 夏凌翔. (2019). 敌意归因偏向对反应性攻击的预测及报复动机的中介作用. 心理科学, 42(6), 1434-1440.] | |
[36] | Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., ... Liu, J. (2006). The reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32(2), 159-171. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2337URL |
[37] | Smeijers, D., Brugman, S., von Borries, K., Verkes, R. J., & Bulten, E. (2018). Lack of correspondence between the reactive proactive questionnaire and the impulsive premeditated aggression scale among forensic psychiatric outpatients. Aggressive Behavior, 44(5), 471-480. doi: 10.1002/ab.v44.5URL |
[38] | Smith, P., & Waterman, M. (2003). Processing bias for aggression words in forensic and nonforensic samples. Cognition and Emotion, 17(5), 681-701. doi: 10.1080/02699930302281URL |
[39] | Spielberger, C. D., Sydeman, S. J., Owen, A. E., & Marsh, B. J. (1999). Measuring anxiety and anger with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI). In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (pp.993-1021). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. |
[40] | Tackett, J. L., Kushner, S. C., Herzhoff, K., Smack, A. J., & Reardon, K. W. (2014). Viewing relational aggression through multiple lenses: Temperament, personality, and personality pathology. Development and Psychopathology, 26(3), 863-877. doi: 10.1017/S0954579414000443URL |
[41] | Thomas, R. A., & Weston, R. (2019). Exploring the association between hostile attribution bias and intimate partner violence in college students: Romantic relationships and friends with benefits. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 29(5), 557-576. doi: 10.1080/10926771.2019.1587561URL |
[42] | Veenstra, L., Bushman, B. J., & Koole, S. L. (2018). The facts on the furious: A brief review of the psychology of trait anger. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 98-103. doi: S2352-250X(17)30073-8pmid: 29279231 |
[43] | Veenstra, L., Schneider, I. K., Bushman, B. J., & Koole, S. L. (2017). Drawn to danger: Trait anger predicts automatic approach behaviour to angry faces. Cognition and Emotion, 31(4), 765-771. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1150256URL |
[44] | Wachs, S. (2012). Moral disengagement and emotional and social difficulties in bullying and cyberbullying: Differences by participant role. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3-4),347-360. doi: 10.1080/13632752.2012.704318URL |
[45] | Wang, X., Yang, L., Yang, J., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2017). Trait anger and cyberbullying among young adults: A moderated mediation model of moral disengagement and moral identity. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 519-526. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.073URL |
[46] | Wang, Y., Cao, S., Zhang, Q., & Xia, L. X. (2020). The longitudinal relationship between angry rumination and reactive-proactive aggression and the moderation effect of consideration of future consequences‐immediate. Aggressive Behavior, 46(6), 476-488. doi: 10.1002/ab.v46.6URL |
[47] | Wenzel, A., & Lystad, C. (2005). Interpretation biases in angry and anxious individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43(8), 1045-1054. |
[48] | Wilkowski, B. M., Crowe, S. E., & Ferguson, E. L. (2015). Learning to keep your cool: Reducing aggression through the experimental modification of cognitive control. Cognition and Emotion, 29(2), 251-265. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.911146URL |
[49] | Wilkowski, B. M., & Robinson, M. D. (2007). Keeping one's cool trait anger, hostile thoughts, and the recruitment of limited capacity control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(9), 1201-1213. |
[50] | Wilkowski, B. M., & Robinson, M. D. (2010). The anatomy of anger: An integrative cognitive model of trait anger and reactive aggression. Journal of Personality, 78(1), 9-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00607.xpmid: 20433611 |
[51] | Wilkowski, B. M., Robinson, M. D., Gordon, R. D., & Troop-Gordon, W. (2007). Tracking the evil eye: Trait anger and selective attention within ambiguously hostile scenes. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(3), 650-666. pmid: 24920865 |
[52] | Zhang, D., & Wang, M. F. (2013). Relationship between moral disengagement and reactive /proactive aggression in middle school students. Chinese Journal School Health, 34(12), 1467-1469+1472. |
[张栋玲, 王美芳. (2013). 初中生道德脱离与主动性攻击反应性攻击的关系. 中国学校卫生, 34(12), 1467-1469 +1472.] |
相关文章 5
[1] | 江琦, 侯璐璐, 邱江, 李长燃, 王焕贞. 尾状核-眶部内侧前额叶的功能连接与反应性攻击的关系:基于静息态功能磁共振研究[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(6): 655-666. |
[2] | 侯璐璐, 江琦, 王焕贞, 李长燃. 特质愤怒对攻击行为的影响: 基于综合认知模型的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(12): 1548-1558. |
[3] | 陈默;梁建. 高绩效要求与亲组织不道德行为:基于社会认知理论的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(1): 94-105. |
[4] | 邱方晖;罗跃嘉;贾世伟. 个体攻击性对愤怒表情类别知觉的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(8): 946-956. |
[5] | 王栋;陈作松. 运动员运动道德推脱与运动亲反社会行为的关系[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(3): 305-317. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4976