), 李婷3, 李金惠1, 何先友1(), 张维1, 陈广耀4 1华南师范大学心理学院/脑认知与教育科学教育部重点实验室(华南师范大学)/心理应用研究中心/广东省心理健康知科学重点实验室, 广州 510631
2北京教育学院学生发展中心, 北京 100120
3松山湖实验中学, 广东 东莞 523000
4暨南大学新闻与传播学院/媒体国家级实验教学示范中心(暨南大学), 广州 510632
收稿日期:2020-06-23发布日期:2021-04-25通讯作者:赵雪汝,何先友E-mail:xianyouhe@163.com;871656880@qq.com基金资助:国家自然科学基金(31970984);国家自然科学基金(31671132);北京教育学院重点关注课题(ZDGZ2019-01);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(19JNQM04)The neural mechanism of the aesthetics of dynamic animal-stick figures
ZHAO Xueru2(), LI Ting3, LI Jinhui1, HE Xianyou1(), ZHANG Wei1, CHEN Guangyao4 1School of Psychology, South China Normal University/Key Laboratory of Brain, Cognition and Education Sciences (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education/Center for Studies of Psychological Application/Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
2Academy of Basic Education Professionals, Beijing Institute of Education, Beijing, 100120, China
3SSL Experimental Middle School, Dongguan 523000, China
4School of Journalism & Communication/National Media & Experimental Teaching Center, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
Received:2020-06-23Published:2021-04-25Contact:ZHAO Xueru,HE Xianyou E-mail:xianyouhe@163.com;871656880@qq.com摘要/Abstract
摘要： 运用行为和fMRI技术, 通过比较动态刺激与静态刺激审美判断的行为和脑机制的异同探讨动态性对简笔画动物审美的影响, 包括两个实验。结果发现, 动态简笔画动物的美观程度评分和喜欢程度评分都显著高于静态简笔画动物。同时, 动态简笔画动物审美判断激活的区域基本涵盖了静态简笔画动物审美所激活的区域, 二者都激活了枕叶区等视觉加工区域、额叶区等认知加工区域、眶额叶皮层等奖赏区域以及海马、脑岛、扣带回、杏仁核等情绪加工区域。与静态简笔画动物的审美相比, 动态简笔画动物的审美显著激活了双侧舌回、双侧MT。本研究结果表明, 动态性影响了对简笔画动物的审美, 动态简笔画动物比静态简笔画动物被判断为更加美观。
图/表 10
图1动态动物和静态动物举例k0
图1动态动物和静态动物举例k0
图2动态动物和静态动物的美观程度评分和喜欢程度评分
图2动态动物和静态动物的美观程度评分和喜欢程度评分表1动态动物审美判断活动激活的脑区
| 大脑区域 | 半球 | 峰值坐标 | t值 | 团簇 大小 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
| 动态动物 > 亮度色块 | ||||||
| 枕下回 | R | 36 | -87 | -12 | 29.97 | 5951 |
| 枕中回 | L | -33 | -90 | -3 | 28.69 | |
| 海马 | L | -21 | -30 | -6 | 14.87 | 94 |
| R | 21 | -30 | -3 | 13.73 | 321 | |
| 岛盖部额下回 | R | 48 | 9 | 27 | 12.86 | 1110 |
| 三角部额下回 | L | -57 | 18 | 30 | 10.08 | 591 |
| 扣带回 | R | 6 | 27 | 36 | 9.75 | 635 |
| L | -6 | 24 | 39 | 9.50 | ||
| 梭状回 | L | -33 | -6 | -36 | 9.51 | 47 |
| 脑岛 | L | -33 | 21 | -6 | 9.13 | 184 |
| 杏仁核 | L | -30 | 0 | -24 | 7.49 | 72 |
| 美观动态动物 > 高亮度色块 | ||||||
| 枕下回 | R | 36 | -87 | -12 | 19.82 | 1975 |
| 枕中回 | L | -33 | -90 | -3 | 19.60 | 1633 |
| 海马 | L | -21 | -30 | -6 | 10.09 | 38 |
| R | 21 | -30 | -3 | 8.80 | 44 | |
| 岛盖部额下回 | R | 48 | 9 | 27 | 9.54 | 307 |
| L | -39 | 3 | 27 | 6.04 | 35 | |
| 梭状回 | R | 30 | -3 | -39 | 8.47 | 29 |
| L | -33 | -6 | -36 | 7.08 | 21 | |
| 扣带回 | L | -6 | 24 | 39 | 6.32 | 83 |
| 不美观动态动物 > 低亮度色块 | ||||||
| 枕下回 | R | 36 | -87 | -12 | 22.51 | 4619 |
| 枕中回 | L | -33 | -90 | -3 | 20.96 | |
| 海马 | L | -21 | -30 | -6 | 11.21 | 65 |
| R | 21 | -30 | -3 | 10.58 | 104 | |
| 梭状回 | R | 30 | -3 | -39 | 9.61 | 40 |
| 岛盖部额下回 | R | 45 | 6 | 24 | 8.87 | 624 |
| 三角部额下回 | L | -57 | 18 | 30 | 7.96 | 315 |
| 扣带回 | R | 6 | 27 | 36 | 7.61 | 323 |
| 脑岛 | L | -33 | 21 | -6 | 7.21 | 118 |
| 眶额叶皮层下部 | R | 48 | 51 | -3 | 6.33 | 62 |
| 杏仁核 | L | -27 | 0 | -24 | 6.29 | 29 |
表1动态动物审美判断活动激活的脑区
| 大脑区域 | 半球 | 峰值坐标 | t值 | 团簇 大小 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
| 动态动物 > 亮度色块 | ||||||
| 枕下回 | R | 36 | -87 | -12 | 29.97 | 5951 |
| 枕中回 | L | -33 | -90 | -3 | 28.69 | |
| 海马 | L | -21 | -30 | -6 | 14.87 | 94 |
| R | 21 | -30 | -3 | 13.73 | 321 | |
| 岛盖部额下回 | R | 48 | 9 | 27 | 12.86 | 1110 |
| 三角部额下回 | L | -57 | 18 | 30 | 10.08 | 591 |
| 扣带回 | R | 6 | 27 | 36 | 9.75 | 635 |
| L | -6 | 24 | 39 | 9.50 | ||
| 梭状回 | L | -33 | -6 | -36 | 9.51 | 47 |
| 脑岛 | L | -33 | 21 | -6 | 9.13 | 184 |
| 杏仁核 | L | -30 | 0 | -24 | 7.49 | 72 |
| 美观动态动物 > 高亮度色块 | ||||||
| 枕下回 | R | 36 | -87 | -12 | 19.82 | 1975 |
| 枕中回 | L | -33 | -90 | -3 | 19.60 | 1633 |
| 海马 | L | -21 | -30 | -6 | 10.09 | 38 |
| R | 21 | -30 | -3 | 8.80 | 44 | |
| 岛盖部额下回 | R | 48 | 9 | 27 | 9.54 | 307 |
| L | -39 | 3 | 27 | 6.04 | 35 | |
| 梭状回 | R | 30 | -3 | -39 | 8.47 | 29 |
| L | -33 | -6 | -36 | 7.08 | 21 | |
| 扣带回 | L | -6 | 24 | 39 | 6.32 | 83 |
| 不美观动态动物 > 低亮度色块 | ||||||
| 枕下回 | R | 36 | -87 | -12 | 22.51 | 4619 |
| 枕中回 | L | -33 | -90 | -3 | 20.96 | |
| 海马 | L | -21 | -30 | -6 | 11.21 | 65 |
| R | 21 | -30 | -3 | 10.58 | 104 | |
| 梭状回 | R | 30 | -3 | -39 | 9.61 | 40 |
| 岛盖部额下回 | R | 45 | 6 | 24 | 8.87 | 624 |
| 三角部额下回 | L | -57 | 18 | 30 | 7.96 | 315 |
| 扣带回 | R | 6 | 27 | 36 | 7.61 | 323 |
| 脑岛 | L | -33 | 21 | -6 | 7.21 | 118 |
| 眶额叶皮层下部 | R | 48 | 51 | -3 | 6.33 | 62 |
| 杏仁核 | L | -27 | 0 | -24 | 6.29 | 29 |
表2静态动物审美判断的激活脑区
| 大脑区域 | 大脑 半球 | 峰值坐标 | t值 | 团簇大小 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
| 静态动物 > 亮度色块 | ||||||
| 枕下回 | R | 36 | -87 | -12 | 27.90 | 4296 |
| 枕中回 | L | -33 | -90 | -3 | 25.82 | |
| 梭状回 | R | 30 | -3 | -39 | 12.51 | 130 |
| L | -33 | -6 | -36 | 9.24 | 72 | |
| 岛盖部额下回 | R | 48 | 9 | 27 | 12.30 | 760 |
| 海马 | L | -21 | -30 | -6 | 11.91 | 56 |
| R | 21 | -30 | -3 | 11.17 | 104 | |
| 扣带回 | R | 6 | 27 | 36 | 9.71 | 348 |
| 三角部额下回 | L | -57 | 18 | 30 | 8.91 | 277 |
| 脑岛 | L | -33 | 21 | -6 | 7.97 | 68 |
| 眶额叶皮层下部 | R | 24 | 24 | -18 | 6.87 | 53 |
| 美观静态动物 > 高亮度色块 | ||||||
| 枕下回 | R | 36 | -87 | -12 | 19.07 | 1308 |
| 枕中回 | L | -33 | -90 | -3 | 18.01 | 1169 |
| 梭状回 | R | 30 | -3 | -39 | 8.07 | 21 |
| 岛盖部额下回 | R | 48 | 9 | 27 | 7.78 | 100 |
| 海马 | R | 21 | -30 | -3 | 7.22 | 21 |
| 三角部额下回 | R | 48 | 30 | 18 | 6.75 | 56 |
| 扣带回 | R | 6 | 27 | 36 | 5.97 | 39 |
| L | -9 | 30 | 33 | 5.41 | ||
| 不美观静态动物 > 低亮度色块 | ||||||
| 枕下回 | R | 36 | -87 | -12 | 20.37 | 3703 |
| 枕中回 | L | -33 | -90 | -3 | 18.51 | |
| 梭状回 | R | 30 | -3 | -39 | 9.60 | 92 |
| L | -33 | -6 | -36 | 6.68 | 25 | |
| 岛盖部额下回 | R | 48 | 9 | 27 | 9.59 | 513 |
| 海马 | L | -21 | -30 | -6 | 9.07 | 41 |
| R | 21 | -30 | -3 | 8.56 | 68 | |
| 扣带回 | R | 6 | 27 | 36 | 7.74 | 143 |
| 三角部额下回 | L | -57 | 18 | 30 | 7.31 | 136 |
| 脑岛 | L | -33 | 21 | -6 | 6.82 | 30 |
| 眶额叶皮层下部 | L | -48 | 48 | -3 | 6.09 | 27 |
| 杏仁核 | L | -30 | 0 | -24 | 6.47 | 24 |
表2静态动物审美判断的激活脑区
| 大脑区域 | 大脑 半球 | 峰值坐标 | t值 | 团簇大小 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
| 静态动物 > 亮度色块 | ||||||
| 枕下回 | R | 36 | -87 | -12 | 27.90 | 4296 |
| 枕中回 | L | -33 | -90 | -3 | 25.82 | |
| 梭状回 | R | 30 | -3 | -39 | 12.51 | 130 |
| L | -33 | -6 | -36 | 9.24 | 72 | |
| 岛盖部额下回 | R | 48 | 9 | 27 | 12.30 | 760 |
| 海马 | L | -21 | -30 | -6 | 11.91 | 56 |
| R | 21 | -30 | -3 | 11.17 | 104 | |
| 扣带回 | R | 6 | 27 | 36 | 9.71 | 348 |
| 三角部额下回 | L | -57 | 18 | 30 | 8.91 | 277 |
| 脑岛 | L | -33 | 21 | -6 | 7.97 | 68 |
| 眶额叶皮层下部 | R | 24 | 24 | -18 | 6.87 | 53 |
| 美观静态动物 > 高亮度色块 | ||||||
| 枕下回 | R | 36 | -87 | -12 | 19.07 | 1308 |
| 枕中回 | L | -33 | -90 | -3 | 18.01 | 1169 |
| 梭状回 | R | 30 | -3 | -39 | 8.07 | 21 |
| 岛盖部额下回 | R | 48 | 9 | 27 | 7.78 | 100 |
| 海马 | R | 21 | -30 | -3 | 7.22 | 21 |
| 三角部额下回 | R | 48 | 30 | 18 | 6.75 | 56 |
| 扣带回 | R | 6 | 27 | 36 | 5.97 | 39 |
| L | -9 | 30 | 33 | 5.41 | ||
| 不美观静态动物 > 低亮度色块 | ||||||
| 枕下回 | R | 36 | -87 | -12 | 20.37 | 3703 |
| 枕中回 | L | -33 | -90 | -3 | 18.51 | |
| 梭状回 | R | 30 | -3 | -39 | 9.60 | 92 |
| L | -33 | -6 | -36 | 6.68 | 25 | |
| 岛盖部额下回 | R | 48 | 9 | 27 | 9.59 | 513 |
| 海马 | L | -21 | -30 | -6 | 9.07 | 41 |
| R | 21 | -30 | -3 | 8.56 | 68 | |
| 扣带回 | R | 6 | 27 | 36 | 7.74 | 143 |
| 三角部额下回 | L | -57 | 18 | 30 | 7.31 | 136 |
| 脑岛 | L | -33 | 21 | -6 | 6.82 | 30 |
| 眶额叶皮层下部 | L | -48 | 48 | -3 | 6.09 | 27 |
| 杏仁核 | L | -30 | 0 | -24 | 6.47 | 24 |
表3动态动物和静态动物共同激活的区域
| 大脑区域 | 大脑 半球 | 峰值坐标 | t值 | 团簇大小 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
| “AD > SL”和“AS > SL”的conjunction分析 | ||||||
| 枕下回 | R | 36 | -87 | -12 | 27.90 | 4296 |
| 枕中回 | L | -33 | -90 | -3 | 25.82 | |
| 梭状回 | R | 30 | -3 | -39 | 12.51 | 126 |
| L | -33 | -6 | -36 | 9.23 | 43 | |
| 岛盖部/三角部额下回 | R | 48 | 9 | 27 | 12.30 | 755 |
| 海马 | L | -21 | -30 | -6 | 11.91 | 56 |
| R | 21 | -30 | -3 | 11.17 | 101 | |
| 扣带回 | R | 6 | 27 | 36 | 9.71 | 344 |
| 岛盖部/三角部额下回 | L | -57 | 18 | 30 | 8.91 | 277 |
| 脑岛 | L | -33 | 21 | -6 | 7.97 | 68 |
| 眶额叶皮层下部 | R | 24 | 24 | -18 | 6.87 | 53 |
| 杏仁核 | L | -30 | 0 | -24 | 6.20 | 24 |
| “BD > HL”和“BS > HL” 的conjunction分析 | ||||||
| 枕下回 | R | 36 | -87 | -12 | 19.07 | 1308 |
| 枕中回 | L | -33 | -90 | -3 | 18.01 | 1169 |
| 梭状回 | R | 30 | -3 | -39 | 8.07 | 21 |
| 岛盖部额下回 | R | 48 | 9 | 27 | 7.78 | 100 |
| 海马 | R | 21 | -30 | -3 | 7.22 | 21 |
| 三角部额下回 | R | 48 | 30 | 18 | 6.75 | 56 |
| 扣带回 | R | 6 | 27 | 36 | 5.97 | 35 |
| L | -3 | 24 | 39 | 5.39 | ||
| “ND > LL”和“NS > LL”的conjunction分析 | ||||||
| 枕下回 | R | 36 | -87 | -12 | 20.37 | 3665 |
| 枕中回 | L | -33 | -90 | -3 | 18.51 | |
| 梭状回 | R | 30 | -3 | -39 | 9.60 | 39 |
| 岛盖部额下回 | R | 45 | 6 | 24 | 8.87 | 379 |
| 海马 | L | -21 | -30 | -6 | 9.07 | 41 |
| R | 21 | -30 | -3 | 8.55 | 68 | |
| 扣带回 | R | 6 | 27 | 36 | 7.61 | 133 |
| 三角部额下回 | L | -57 | 18 | 30 | 7.31 | 133 |
| 脑岛 | L | -33 | 21 | -6 | 6.82 | 30 |
| R | 39 | 27 | 0 | 6.41 | 96 | |
| 眶额叶皮层下部 | L | -48 | 48 | -3 | 6.09 | 27 |
表3动态动物和静态动物共同激活的区域
| 大脑区域 | 大脑 半球 | 峰值坐标 | t值 | 团簇大小 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
| “AD > SL”和“AS > SL”的conjunction分析 | ||||||
| 枕下回 | R | 36 | -87 | -12 | 27.90 | 4296 |
| 枕中回 | L | -33 | -90 | -3 | 25.82 | |
| 梭状回 | R | 30 | -3 | -39 | 12.51 | 126 |
| L | -33 | -6 | -36 | 9.23 | 43 | |
| 岛盖部/三角部额下回 | R | 48 | 9 | 27 | 12.30 | 755 |
| 海马 | L | -21 | -30 | -6 | 11.91 | 56 |
| R | 21 | -30 | -3 | 11.17 | 101 | |
| 扣带回 | R | 6 | 27 | 36 | 9.71 | 344 |
| 岛盖部/三角部额下回 | L | -57 | 18 | 30 | 8.91 | 277 |
| 脑岛 | L | -33 | 21 | -6 | 7.97 | 68 |
| 眶额叶皮层下部 | R | 24 | 24 | -18 | 6.87 | 53 |
| 杏仁核 | L | -30 | 0 | -24 | 6.20 | 24 |
| “BD > HL”和“BS > HL” 的conjunction分析 | ||||||
| 枕下回 | R | 36 | -87 | -12 | 19.07 | 1308 |
| 枕中回 | L | -33 | -90 | -3 | 18.01 | 1169 |
| 梭状回 | R | 30 | -3 | -39 | 8.07 | 21 |
| 岛盖部额下回 | R | 48 | 9 | 27 | 7.78 | 100 |
| 海马 | R | 21 | -30 | -3 | 7.22 | 21 |
| 三角部额下回 | R | 48 | 30 | 18 | 6.75 | 56 |
| 扣带回 | R | 6 | 27 | 36 | 5.97 | 35 |
| L | -3 | 24 | 39 | 5.39 | ||
| “ND > LL”和“NS > LL”的conjunction分析 | ||||||
| 枕下回 | R | 36 | -87 | -12 | 20.37 | 3665 |
| 枕中回 | L | -33 | -90 | -3 | 18.51 | |
| 梭状回 | R | 30 | -3 | -39 | 9.60 | 39 |
| 岛盖部额下回 | R | 45 | 6 | 24 | 8.87 | 379 |
| 海马 | L | -21 | -30 | -6 | 9.07 | 41 |
| R | 21 | -30 | -3 | 8.55 | 68 | |
| 扣带回 | R | 6 | 27 | 36 | 7.61 | 133 |
| 三角部额下回 | L | -57 | 18 | 30 | 7.31 | 133 |
| 脑岛 | L | -33 | 21 | -6 | 6.82 | 30 |
| R | 39 | 27 | 0 | 6.41 | 96 | |
| 眶额叶皮层下部 | L | -48 | 48 | -3 | 6.09 | 27 |
表4动态动物与静态动物审美判断的脑区差异
| 大脑区域 | 大脑半球 | 峰值坐标 | t值 | 团簇大小 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
| 动态动物 > 静态动物 | ||||||
| 舌回 | L | -24 | -84 | -15 | 7.36 | 3071 |
| R | 21 | -84 | -12 | 7.16 | ||
| 静态动物 > 动态动物 | ||||||
| 没有显著激活区域 | ||||||
表4动态动物与静态动物审美判断的脑区差异
| 大脑区域 | 大脑半球 | 峰值坐标 | t值 | 团簇大小 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
| 动态动物 > 静态动物 | ||||||
| 舌回 | L | -24 | -84 | -15 | 7.36 | 3071 |
| R | 21 | -84 | -12 | 7.16 | ||
| 静态动物 > 动态动物 | ||||||
| 没有显著激活区域 | ||||||
图3动态动物和静态动物审美判断的差异脑区
图3动态动物和静态动物审美判断的差异脑区表5美观动态动物与美观静态动物的激活区域差异
| 大脑区域 | 大脑半球 | 峰值坐标 | t值 | 团簇大小 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
| 美观动态动物 > 美观静态动物 | ||||||
| 舌回 | R | 9 | -90 | -9 | 7.30 | 1603 |
| MT | R | 51 | -66 | 3 | 5.24 | 152 |
| 枕中回 | R | 33 | -78 | 15 | 4.66 | 74 |
| 美观静态动物 > 美观动态动物 | ||||||
| 没有显著激活区域 | ||||||
表5美观动态动物与美观静态动物的激活区域差异
| 大脑区域 | 大脑半球 | 峰值坐标 | t值 | 团簇大小 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
| 美观动态动物 > 美观静态动物 | ||||||
| 舌回 | R | 9 | -90 | -9 | 7.30 | 1603 |
| MT | R | 51 | -66 | 3 | 5.24 | 152 |
| 枕中回 | R | 33 | -78 | 15 | 4.66 | 74 |
| 美观静态动物 > 美观动态动物 | ||||||
| 没有显著激活区域 | ||||||
图4美观的动态动物与静态动物以及不美观的动态动物与静态动物审美判断的差异脑区
图4美观的动态动物与静态动物以及不美观的动态动物与静态动物审美判断的差异脑区表6不美观动态动物与不美观静态动物的激活区域差异
| 大脑区域 | 大脑半球 | 峰值坐标 | t值 | 团簇大小 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
| 不美观动态动物 > 不美观静态动物 | ||||||
| 舌回 | L | -15 | -90 | -12 | 5.62 | 585 |
| 枕中回 | R | 33 | -84 | 9 | 4.88 | 164 |
| 不美观静态动物 > 不美观动态动物 | ||||||
| 没有显著激活区域 | ||||||
表6不美观动态动物与不美观静态动物的激活区域差异
| 大脑区域 | 大脑半球 | 峰值坐标 | t值 | 团簇大小 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
| 不美观动态动物 > 不美观静态动物 | ||||||
| 舌回 | L | -15 | -90 | -12 | 5.62 | 585 |
| 枕中回 | R | 33 | -84 | 9 | 4.88 | 164 |
| 不美观静态动物 > 不美观动态动物 | ||||||
| 没有显著激活区域 | ||||||
参考文献 45
| [1] | Baudouin, J.-Y., & Tiberghien, G. (2004). Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychologica, 117(3),313-332. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.07.002URL |
| [2] | Berlyne, D.E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. |
| [3] | Biaggio, M.K., & Supplee, K.A. (1983). Dimensions of aesthetic perception. Journal of Psychology, 114(1),29-35. |
| [4] | Blood, A.J., & Zatorre, R.J. (2001). Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(20),11818-11823. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191355898URL |
| [5] | Bohrn, I.C., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A.M. (2013). When we like what we know - A parametric fMRI analysis of beauty and familiarity. Brain & Language, 124(1),1-8. |
| [6] | Bray, S., & O'Doherty, J. (2007). Neural coding of reward- prediction error signals during classical conditioning with attractive faces. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97,3036-3045. doi: 10.1152/jn.01211.2006URL |
| [7] | Brown, S., Martinez, M.J., & Parsons, L.M. (2004). Passive music listening spontaneously engages limbic and paralimbic systems. Neuroreport, 15(13),2033-2037. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200409150-00008URL |
| [8] | Cattaneo, Z., Schiavi, S., Silvanto, J., & Nadal, M. (2015). A TMS study on the contribution of visual area V5 to the perception of implied motion in art and its appreciation. Cognitive Neuroscience. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1083968. |
| [9] | Cazzato, V., Siega, S., & Urgesi, C. (2012). “What women like”: Influence of motion and form on esthetic body perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(3),235. |
| [10] | Cela-Conde, C.J., Marty, G., Maestú, F., Ortiz, T., Munar, E., Fernández, A.… Quesney, F. (2004). Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception. Proceedings of National Academy of Science, 101,6321-6325. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401427101URL |
| [11] | Chakravarty, A. (2010). Mona Lisa's smile: A hypothesis based on a new principle of art neuroscience. Medical Hypotheses, 75(1),69-72. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2010.01.032pmid: 20171787 |
| [12] | Chatterjee, A., Thomas, A., Smith, S.E., & Aguirre, G.K. (2009). The neural response to facial attractiveness. Neuropsychology, 23(2),135-143. doi: 10.1037/a0014430pmid: 19254086 |
| [13] | Cupchik, G.C. (2002). The evolution of psychical distance as an aesthetic concept. Culture and Psychology, 8(2),155-187. doi: 10.1177/1354067X02008002437URL |
| [14] | Cupchik, G.C., Vartanian, O., Crawley, A., & Mikulis, D.J. (2009). Viewing artworks: Contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain and Cognition, 70(1),84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.003pmid: 19223099 |
| [15] | Di Dio, C., Macaluso, E., & Rizzolatti, G. (2007). The golden beauty: Brain response to classical and renaissance sculpture. PLoS ONE, 2(11), e1201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001201. |
| [16] | Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2),301-307. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00838-9URL |
| [17] | Hekkert, P., Snelders, D. & van Wieringen, P.C.W. (2003). 'Most advanced, yet acceptable': Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. British Journal of Psychology, 94(1),111-124. doi: 10.1348/000712603762842147URL |
| [18] | Huang, Z.L., & Zhang, W.D. (2012). Neuroaesthetics: Exploring aesthetics and the brain. Advances in Psychological Science, 20(5),672-681. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2012.00672URL |
| [ 黄子岚, 张卫东. (2012). 神经美学: 探索审美与大脑的关系. 心理科学进展>, 20(5),672-681.] | |
| [19] | Jacobsen, T., Schubotz, R.I., H?fel, L.,& von Cramon, D.Y. (2006). Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. NeuroImage, 29(1),276-285. pmid: 16087351 |
| [20] | Kawabata, H., & Zeki, S. (2004). Neural correlates of beauty. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91(4),1699-1705. doi: 10.1152/jn.00696.2003URL |
| [21] | Kim, H., Adolphs, R., O'Doherty, J.P., & Shimojo, S. (2007). Temporal isolation of neural processes underlying face preference decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(46),18253-18258. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703101104URL |
| [22] | Kirk, U., Skov, M., Christensen, M.S., & Nygaard, N. (2009). Brain correlates of aesthetic expertise: A parametric fMRI study. Brain and Cognition, 69(2),306-315. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.004URL |
| [23] | Kirk, U., Skov, M., Hulme, O., Christensen, M.S., & Zeki, S. (2009). Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 44(3),1125-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.009URL |
| [24] | Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(1),48. doi: 10.1162/08989290051137594URL |
| [25] | Kranz, F., & Ishai, A. (2006). Face perception is modulated by sexual preference. Current Biology, 16(1),63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.070URL |
| [26] | Mastandrea, S., & Umiltà, M. (2016). Futurist art: Motion and aesthetics as a function of title. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10,311. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00201. |
| [27] | Mende-Siedlecki, P., Said, C.P., & Todorov, A. (2013). The social evaluation of faces: A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(3),285-299. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr090pmid: 22287188 |
| [28] | Mizokami, Y., Terao, T., Hatano, K., Hoaki, N., Kohno, K., Araki, Y.… Kochiyama, T. (2014). Difference in brain activations during appreciating paintings and photographic analogs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 478. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00478. |
| [29] | O'Doherty, J., Winston, J., Critchley, H., Perrett, D., Burt, D.M., & Dolan, R.J. (2003). Beauty in a smile: The role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia, 41(2),147-155. pmid: 12459213 |
| [30] | Phillips, J.A., Noppeney, U., Humphreys, G.W., & Price, C.J. (2002). Can segregation within the semantic system account for category-specific deficits? Brain, 125,2067-2080. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf215URL |
| [31] | Rhodes, G., Proffitt, F., Grady, J.M., & Sumich, A. (1998). Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5,659-669. doi: 10.3758/BF03208842URL |
| [32] | Ruby, P., & Decety, J. (2001). Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A PET investigation of agency. Nature Neuroscience, 4(5),546-550. doi: 10.1038/87510URL |
| [33] | Rymarczyk, K., ?urawski, L., Jankowiak-Siuda, K., & Szatkowska, I. (2019). Empathy in facial mimicry of fear and disgust: Simultaneous EMG-fMRI recordings during observation of static and dynamic facial expressions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10,701. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00701pmid: 30971997 |
| [34] | Tsukiura, T., & Cabeza, R. (2011a). Shared brain activity for aesthetic and moral judgments: Implications for the beauty- is-good stereotype. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(1),138-148. doi: http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/10.1093/scan/nsq025. doi: http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/10.1093/scan/nsq025URL |
| [35] | Tsukiura, T., & Cabeza, R. (2011b). Remembering beauty: Roles of orbitofrontal and hippocampal regions in successful memory encoding of attractive faces. Neuroimage. 54(1),653-660. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.046URL |
| [36] | Urgesi, C., Mele, S., & Cazzato, V. (2012). TMS investigations of the influence of body form and body action representations on body aesthetic perception. Cognitive Processing, 13(13),29. |
| [37] | Vartanian, O., & Goel, V. (2004). Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings. NeuroReport, 15(5),893-897. pmid: 15073538 |
| [38] | Wallentin, M., Nielsen, A.H., Vuust, P., Dohn, A., Roepstorff, A., & Lund, T.E. (2011). BOLD response to motion verbs in left posterior middle temporal gyrus during story comprehension. Brain & Language, 119(3),221. |
| [39] | Winston, J.S., O'Doherty, J., Kilner, J.M., Perrett, D.I., & Dolan, R.J. (2007). Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia, 45(1),195-206. pmid: 16828125 |
| [40] | Yan, C.G., Wang, X.D., Zuo, X.N., & Zang, Y.F. (2016). DPABI: Data processing & analysis for (resting-state) brain imaging. Neuroinformatics, 14,339-351. doi: http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/10.1007/s12021-016-9299-4. doi: http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/10.1007/s12021-016-9299-4URL |
| [41] | Zeki, S. (1999). Art and the brain. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6-7),76-96. |
| [42] | Zeki, S., & Lamb, M. (1994). The neurology of kinetic art. Brain, 117(3),607-636. doi: 10.1093/brain/117.3.607URL |
| [43] | Zeki, S., & Stutters, J. (2012). A brain-derived metric for preferred kinetic stimuli. Open Biology, 2(2), 120001 doi: 10.1098/rsob.120001.. |
| [44] | Zhang, W., He, X., Lai, S., Wan, J., Lai, S., Zhao, X., & Li, D. (2017). Neural substrates of embodied natural beauty and social endowed beauty: An fMRI study. Scientific Reports, 7(1),7125. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07608-8pmid: 28769082 |
| [45] | Zhang, W., Lai, S., He, X., Zhao, X., & Lai, S. (2016). Neural correlates for aesthetic appraisal of pictograph and its referent: An fMRI study. Behavioral Brain Research, 305,229-238. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.02.029URL |
相关文章 2
| [1] | 彭彦琴. 中国传统情感心理学中“儒道互补”的情感模式[J]. 心理学报, 2002, 34(05): 98-103. |
| [2] | 沈德立, 白学军, 阎国利. 不同书法知识经验者在书法字审美过程中的眼动特点研究[J]. 心理学报, 2000, 32(增刊): 56-59. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4954
