删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

特质性自我构念与内外群体疼痛共情的关系: 来自事件相关电位的证据

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

陈杰1,2(), 伍可1,2, 史宇鹏1,2(), 艾小青3
1湖南师范大学教育科学学院
2认知与人类行为湖南省重点实验室, 长沙 410081
3北京工业大学经济与管理学院, 北京 100124
收稿日期:2020-11-02发布日期:2021-04-25
通讯作者:陈杰,史宇鹏E-mail:xlxchen@163.com;shiyupeng9301@foxmail.com

基金资助:国家自然科学基金(NSFC31771240);湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(15YBA263);湖南省教育厅科学研究项目(18A036)

The relationship between dispositional self-construal and empathy for ingroup and outgroup members' pain: evidence from ERPs

CHEN Jie1,2(), WU Ke1,2, SHI Yupeng1,2(), AI Xiaoqing3
1School of Educational Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
2Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410081, China
3School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
Received:2020-11-02Published:2021-04-25
Contact:CHEN Jie,SHI Yupeng E-mail:xlxchen@163.com;shiyupeng9301@foxmail.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 以往研究发现暂时的自我构念启动会调节对他人的疼痛共情。本研究旨在探究稳定的特质性自我构念与内、外群体疼痛共情的关系。实验采用启动范式对内、外群体进行区分, 被试的任务是认真观看并判断图片的人物是否感到了疼痛, 同时记录他们的EEG数据。结果显示:在N2成分上出现了明显的内群体效应, 即观看内群体疼痛图片比内群体非疼痛图片会诱发更大的N2波幅, 而观看外群体疼痛和外群体非疼痛图片诱发的N2波幅没有显著差异, 这表明内、外群体因素会影响疼痛共情中的早期情绪分享过程。在P3成分上, 在内、外群体启动条件下, 疼痛图片比非疼痛图片都要诱发更大的P3波幅。更重要的是, 自我构念分数(互依型减独立型分数)与内、外群体疼痛共情(疼痛减非疼痛条件)诱发的P3波幅都呈正相关关系, 但两者的相关系数没有显著差异, 这表明特质性自我构念与疼痛共情中的晚期认知评价过程密切相关, 而且这种相关程度在内、外群体条件间是相似的。



图1实验流程图
图1实验流程图


表1被试在不同条件下疼痛判断的反应时和正确率(M ± SE)
刺激类型 正确率(%) 反应时(ms)
疼痛
内群体 88.33 ± 3.55 555.82 ± 13.96
外群体 88.89 ± 3.26 565.02 ± 9.74
非疼痛
内群体 93.15 ± 1.87 578.20 ± 8.20
外群体 93.15 ± 1.86 575.00 ± 8.12

表1被试在不同条件下疼痛判断的反应时和正确率(M ± SE)
刺激类型 正确率(%) 反应时(ms)
疼痛
内群体 88.33 ± 3.55 555.82 ± 13.96
外群体 88.89 ± 3.26 565.02 ± 9.74
非疼痛
内群体 93.15 ± 1.87 578.20 ± 8.20
外群体 93.15 ± 1.86 575.00 ± 8.12


表2被试在不同条件下的疼痛强度和难受度评定(M ± SE)
刺激类型 疼痛强度评定 难受度评定
疼痛
内群体 3.18 ± 1.13 3.23 ± 1.23
外群体 3.15 ± 1.14 3.23 ± 1.32
非疼痛
内群体 1.65 ± 0.62 1.55 ± 0.58
外群体 1.59 ± 0.55 1.51 ± 0.54

表2被试在不同条件下的疼痛强度和难受度评定(M ± SE)
刺激类型 疼痛强度评定 难受度评定
疼痛
内群体 3.18 ± 1.13 3.23 ± 1.23
外群体 3.15 ± 1.14 3.23 ± 1.32
非疼痛
内群体 1.65 ± 0.62 1.55 ± 0.58
外群体 1.59 ± 0.55 1.51 ± 0.54



图2(a-b)自我构念分数与内、外群体疼痛强度的相关散点图; (c-d)自我构念分数与内、外群体难受度的相关散点图。
图2(a-b)自我构念分数与内、外群体疼痛强度的相关散点图; (c-d)自我构念分数与内、外群体难受度的相关散点图。



图3疼痛刺激和非疼痛刺激诱发的脑电波及疼痛刺激和非疼痛刺激的差异地形图
图3疼痛刺激和非疼痛刺激诱发的脑电波及疼痛刺激和非疼痛刺激的差异地形图



图4(a-b)自我构念分数与内、外群体疼痛共情的N2差异波的相关散点图; (c-d)自我构念分数与内、外群体疼痛共情的P3差异波的相关散点图。
图4(a-b)自我构念分数与内、外群体疼痛共情的N2差异波的相关散点图; (c-d)自我构念分数与内、外群体疼痛共情的P3差异波的相关散点图。







[1] Azevedo, R.T., Macaluso, E., Avenanti, A., Santangelo, V., Cazzato, V., & Aglioti, S.M. (2012). Their pain is not our pain: Brain and autonomic correlates of empathic resonance with the pain of same and different race individuals. Human Brain Mapping, 34(12),3168-3181.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.v34.12URL
[2] Chen, J., Chang, B., Li, W., Shi, Y., Shen, H., Wang, R., & Liu, L. (2020). Dispositional self-construal modulates the empathy for others' pain: An ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11,508141.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.508141URL
[3] Chen, J., Yuan, P., Cai, Y., Liu, C., & Li, W. (2020). Dispositional self-construal modulates neural representation of self: An ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11,895.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00895pmid: 32528355
[4] Cheng, J., Jiao, C., Luo, Y., & Cui, F. (2017). Music induced happy mood suppresses the neural responses to other's pain: Evidences from an ERP study.Scientific Reports, 7(1),13054.
[5] Cheng, J., Luo, Y., & Cui, F. (2017). Empathy for pain influenced by cognitive load: Evidence from an ERP study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(5),622-630.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00622URL
[ 程家萍, 罗跃嘉, 崔芳. (2017). 认知负荷对疼痛共情的影响: 来自ERP研究的证据. 心理学报>, 49(5),622-630.]
[6] Chiao, J.Y., Harada, T., Komeda, H., Li, Z., Mano, Y., Saito, D.N.,... Iidaka, T. (2009). Neural basis of individualistic and collectivistic views of self. Human Brain Mapping, 30(9),2813-2820.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20707pmid: 19107754
[7] Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., & Kurzban, R. (2003). Perceptions of race. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(4),173-179.
pmid: 12691766
[8] Cross, S.E., Hardin, E.E., & Gercek-Swing, B. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2),142-179.
doi: 10.1177/1088868310373752URL
[9] Cui, F., Ma, N., & Luo, Y. (2016). Moral judgment modulates neural responses to the perception of other's pain: An ERP study. Scientific Reports, 6(1),20851.
doi: 10.1038/srep20851URL
[10] Decety, J. (2009). Empathy, sympathy and the perception of pain. Pain, 145(3),365-366.
doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.08.006pmid: 19716658
[11] Decety, J., & Jackson, P.L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral & Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2),71-100.
[12] Decety, J., Yang, C., & Cheng, Y. (2010). Physicians down-regulate their pain empathy response: An event-related brain potential study. Neuroimage, 50(4),1676-1682.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.025pmid: 20080194
[13] Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2015). cocor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. Plos One, 10(4),e0121945.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121945URL
[14] Fan, Y., & Han, S. (2008). Temporal dynamic of neural mechanisms involved in empathy for pain: An event-related brain potential study. Neuropsychologia, 46(1),160-173.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.023URL
[15] Feng, C., Li, Z., Feng, X., Wang, L., Tian, T., & Luo, Y. (2016). Social hierarchy modulates neural responses of empathy for pain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(3),485-495.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv135URL
[16] Han, S., Fan, Y., & Mao, L. (2008). Gender difference in empathy for pain: An electrophysiological investigation. Brain Research. 1196,85-93.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.12.062URL
[17] Huang, R., Liu, M., Yao S., & John, R.Z.A. (2009). The self-construal scale: An examination of its reliability and validity among Chinese university students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 17(3),306-308.
[ 黄任之, 刘明矾, 姚树桥, John R. Z. A. (2009). 自我结构量表在中国大学生中应用的信效度分析. 中国临床心理学杂志>, 17(3),306-308.]
[18] Ito, T.A., Larsen, J.T., Smith, N.K., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,75(4),887-900.
pmid: 9825526
[19] Ito, T.A., & Urland, G.R. (2003). Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4),616-626.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.616URL
[20] Jackson, P.L., Brunet, E., Meltzoff, A.N., & Decety, J. (2006). Empathy examined through the neural mechanisms involved in imagining how I feel versus how you feel pain. Neuropsychologia, 44(5),752-761.
pmid: 16140345
[21] Jiang, C., Varnum, M.E.W., Hou, Y., & Han, S. (2014). Distinct effects of self-construal priming on empathic neural responses in Chinese and Westerners. Social Neuroscience, 9(2),130-138.
doi: 10.1080/17470919.2013.867899pmid: 24341541
[22] Kitayama, S., Yanagisawa, K., Ito, A., Ueda, R., Uchida, Y., & Abe, N. (2017). Reduced orbitofrontal cortical volume is associated with interdependent self-construal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(30),7969-7974.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704831114pmid: 28701382
[23] Li, S. (2011). The neural mechanism of the own-group bias and the effect of group size (Unpublished master's thesis). Southwest University, China.
[ 李森森. (2011). 内群体效应的电生理学研究及群体规模对该效应的影响 (硕士学位论文). 西南大学>.]
[24] Li, W., & Han, S. (2010). Perspective taking modulates event- related potentials to perceived pain. Neuroscience Letters, 469(3),328-332.
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.12.021URL
[25] Lin, Z., & Han, S. (2009). Self-construal priming modulates the scope of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(4),802-813.
doi: 10.1080/17470210802271650URL
[26] Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2),224-253.
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224URL
[27] Mathur, V.A., Harada, T., Lipke, T., & Chiao, J.Y. (2010). Neural basis of extraordinary empathy and altruistic motivation. Neuroimage, 51(4),1468-1475.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.025pmid: 20302945
[28] Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10),2128-2148.
pmid: 17573239
[29] Sessa, P., Meconi, F., Castelli, L., & Dell'Acqua, R. (2014). Taking one's time in feeling other-race pain: An event- related potential investigation on the time-course of cross- racial empathy. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 9(4),454-463.
[30] Sheng, F., Du, N., & Han, S. (2016). Degraded perceptual and affective processing of racial out-groups: An electrophysiological approach. Social Neuroscience, 12(4),479-487.
doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1182944URL
[31] Sheng, F., & Han, S. (2012). Manipulations of cognitive strategies and intergroup relationships reduce the racial bias in empathic neural responses. Neuroimage, 61(4),786-797.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.028pmid: 22542636
[32] Singelis, T.M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,20(5),580-591.
[33] Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J.P., Stephan, K.E., Dolan, R.J., & Frith, C.D. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439(7075),466-469.
pmid: 16421576
[34] Song, J., Guo, F., Zhang, Z., Yuan, S., Jin, H., & Wang, Y. (2016). Interpersonal distance influences on pain empathy: Friends priming effect. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(7),833-844.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00833URL
[ 宋娟, 郭丰波, 张振, 原胜, 金花, 王益文. (2016). 人际距离影响疼痛共情: 朋友启动效应. 心理学报>, 48(7),833-844.]
[35] Sui, J., & Han, S. (2007). Self-construal priming modulates neural substrates of self-awareness. Psychological Science, 18(10),861-866.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01992.xURL
[36] Sui, J., Hong, Y., Liu, C.H., Humphreys, G.W., & Han, S. (2013). Dynamic cultural modulation of neural responses to one's own and friend's faces. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience,8(3),326-332.
[37] Suzuki, Y., Galli, L., Ikeda, A., Itakura, S., & Kitazaki, M. (2015). Measuring empathy for human and robot hand pain using electroencephalography. Scientific Reports. 5, 15924.
[38] Wang, C. (2014). Influences of self-construal priming on pain processing and empathy for pain (Unpublished doctor's dissertation). Peking University, China,
[ 汪晨波. (2014). 自我构念对疼痛加工与痛觉共情的影响 (博士学位论文). 北京大学>.]
[39] Wang, C., Ma, Y., & Han, S. (2014). Self-construal priming modulates pain perception: Event-related potential evidence. Cognitive Neuroscience. 5(1),3-9.
doi: 10.1080/17588928.2013.797388URL
[40] Wang, C., Wu, B., Liu, Y., Wu, X., & Han, S. (2015). Challenging emotional prejudice by changing self-concept: Priming independent self-construal reduces racial in-group bias in neural responses to other's pain. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 10(9),1195-1201.
[41] Xu, X., Zuo, X., Wang, X., & Han, S. (2009). Do you feel my pain? Racial group membership modulates empathic neural responses. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(26),8525-8529.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2418-09.2009URL
[42] Zhu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, J., & Han, S. (2007). Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation. Neuroimage, 34(3),1310-1316.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.047URL




[1]岳童, 黄希庭, 岳彩镇, 薛黎明, 傅安国. 自身得失对朋友博弈结果评价的影响:来自ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(6): 651-666.
[2]宋仕婕, 佐斌, 温芳芳, 谭潇. 群体认同对群际敏感效应及其行为表现的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(8): 993-1003.
[3]李琎, 孙宇, 杨子鹿, 钟毅平. 社会价值取向对自我社会奖赏加工的影响——来自ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(6): 786-800.
[4]李雄,李祚山,向滨洋,孟景. 注意线索对自闭特质个体疼痛共情的影响:来自事件相关电位的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(3): 294-306.
[5]孙岩, 吕娇娇, 兰帆, 张丽娜. 自我关注重评和情境关注重评情绪调节策略及对随后认知控制的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(12): 1393-1406.
[6]罗禹,念靖晴,鲍未,张静静,赵守盈,潘运,许爽,张禹. 急性应激损害对威胁刺激的注意解除[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(1): 26-37.
[7]李寿欣, 车晓玮, 李彦佼, 王丽, 陈恺盛. 视觉工作记忆负载类型对注意选择的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(5): 527-542.
[8]黄亮,杨雪,黄志华,王益文. 理解双人肢体运动表达的友好和敌对意图的ERP证据[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(5): 557-570.
[9]刘璐,肖雪,刘丽莎,徐良苑,张旭然,李燕芳. 儿童在不同卷入情境下基于资源价值的分配行为特点:内群体偏爱的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(5): 584-597.
[10]王丽丽, 冯文锋, 贾丽娜, 朱湘茹, 罗文波, 杨苏勇, 罗跃嘉. 赢分与输分运动员面孔表情和身体姿势情绪的加工机制[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(8): 892-906.
[11]杨青青, 胡娜, 陈旭, 牛娟, 翟晶. 恋人亲密情景下的回避型与安全型 依恋个体情绪调节电生理差异[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(3): 306-316.
[12]付超, 张振, 何金洲, 黄四林, 仇剑崟, 王益文. 普遍信任博弈决策的动态过程 ——来自脑电时频分析的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(3): 317-326.
[13]田录梅, 袁竞驰, 李永梅. 同伴在场和自尊水平对青少年冒险行为的影响:来自ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(1): 47-57.
[14]王益文, 付超, 任相峰, 林羽中, 郭丰波, 张 振, 黄亮, 袁博, 郑玉玮. 自恋人格调节信任博弈的结果评价[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(8): 1080-1088.
[15]付艺蕾, 罗跃嘉, 崔芳. 选择一致性影响结果评价的ERP研究[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(8): 1089-1099.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4958
相关话题/心理 分数 图片 实验 过程