刘宇平¹, 李姗珊², 何赟², 王豆豆², 杨波²()

¹中国政法大学刑事司法学院, 北京 100088
²中国政法大学社会学院, 北京 100088

收稿日期:2020-06-09出版日期:2021-03-25发布日期:2021-01-27
通讯作者:杨波E-mail:zsdybo@sina.com

基金资助:* 国家重点研发计划项目资助(2018YFC0831002)

Eliminating threat or venting rage?The relationship between narcissism and aggression in violent offenders

LIU Yuping¹, LI Shanshan², HE Yun², WANG Doudou², YANG Bo²()

¹School of Criminal Justice, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China
²School of Sociology, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China

Received:2020-06-09Online:2021-03-25Published:2021-01-27
Contact:YANG Bo E-mail:zsdybo@sina.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过2个研究探索了自恋与暴力犯攻击行为的关系及机制。研究1通过问卷法(N = 498)发现, 自恋与攻击存在正相关, 特质愤怒在自恋与预谋性和冲动性攻击间的中介作用成立, 心理特权的中介作用只对预谋性攻击成立。研究2对90名暴力犯进行了行为学实验, 结果表明威胁感和负性情绪在自恋与攻击间起中介作用, 挑衅调节了上述中介作用。显性自恋者只在挑衅条件下表现出更强的攻击性, 隐性自恋者则在挑衅和无挑衅条件下均有较强的攻击性。研究厘清了不同亚型下自恋与攻击的关系, 突出了隐性自恋的“黑暗性”, 并为罪犯矫治管理及犯罪预防提供了参考。

图/表 11

图1自恋与攻击关联的假设模型图
图1自恋与攻击关联的假设模型图


表1描述性统计和相关矩阵(N = 498)

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6
1隐性自恋	27.40	5.83	—
2显性自恋	3.18	2.40	0.24**	—
3特质愤怒	20.13	5.35	0.39**	0.30**	—
4心理特权	30.62	9.54	0.24**	0.24**	0.31**	—
5冲动性攻击	15.91	4.87	0.38**	0.19**	0.62**	0.27**	—
6预谋性攻击	22.09	7.71	0.42**	0.31**	0.60**	0.35**	0.72**	—

表1描述性统计和相关矩阵(N = 498)

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6
1隐性自恋	27.40	5.83	—
2显性自恋	3.18	2.40	0.24**	—
3特质愤怒	20.13	5.35	0.39**	0.30**	—
4心理特权	30.62	9.54	0.24**	0.24**	0.31**	—
5冲动性攻击	15.91	4.87	0.38**	0.19**	0.62**	0.27**	—
6预谋性攻击	22.09	7.71	0.42**	0.31**	0.60**	0.35**	0.72**	—

表2多重中介模型拟合度指标

模型	c2	df	c2/df	RMSEA	SRMR	CFI	GFI	IFI	NFI	TLI
M1	223.24	105	2.13	0.05	0.05	0.97	0.95	0.97	0.94	0.96
M2	226.64	107	2.12	0.05	0.05	0.97	0.95	0.97	0.94	0.96

表2多重中介模型拟合度指标

模型	c2	df	c2/df	RMSEA	SRMR	CFI	GFI	IFI	NFI	TLI
M1	223.24	105	2.13	0.05	0.05	0.97	0.95	0.97	0.94	0.96
M2	226.64	107	2.12	0.05	0.05	0.97	0.95	0.97	0.94	0.96

图2自恋与攻击多重中介作用的结构方程模型图 注：为保持简洁, 仅保留了结构模型, 省略了测量模型。潜变量到显变量的路径系数均在0.52~0.97之间。图中系数均为标准化系数。
图2自恋与攻击多重中介作用的结构方程模型图 注：为保持简洁, 仅保留了结构模型, 省略了测量模型。潜变量到显变量的路径系数均在0.52~0.97之间。图中系数均为标准化系数。


表3主要效应量显著性的bootstrap检验

编号	路径	标准化效应量	SD	95% CI
中介效应1	隐性自恋→特质愤怒→冲动攻击	0.30	0.05	[0.195, 0.400]
中介效应2	隐性自恋→特质愤怒→预谋攻击	0.24	0.05	[0.151, 0.335]
中介效应3	隐性自恋→心理特权→冲动攻击	0.02	0.02	[-0.013, 0.052]
中介效应4	隐性自恋→心理特权→预谋攻击	0.04	0.02	[0.006, 0.075]
中介效应5	显性自恋→特质愤怒→冲动攻击	0.18	0.06	[0.077, 0.302]
中介效应6	显性自恋→特质愤怒→预谋攻击	0.15	0.04	[0.065, 0.232]
中介效应7	显性自恋→心理特权→冲动攻击	0.02	0.02	[-0.010, 0.048]
中介效应8	显性自恋→心理特权→预谋攻击	0.03	0.02	[0.006, 0.062]
直接效应1	隐性自恋→冲动攻击	0.18	0.08	[0.035, 0.327]
直接效应2	隐性自恋→预谋攻击	0.22	0.07	[0.091, 0.349]
直接效应3	显性自恋→冲动攻击	-0.08	0.07	[-0.227, 0.063]
直接效应4	显性自恋→预谋攻击	0.06	0.07	[-0.070, 0.196]

表3主要效应量显著性的bootstrap检验

编号	路径	标准化效应量	SD	95% CI
中介效应1	隐性自恋→特质愤怒→冲动攻击	0.30	0.05	[0.195, 0.400]
中介效应2	隐性自恋→特质愤怒→预谋攻击	0.24	0.05	[0.151, 0.335]
中介效应3	隐性自恋→心理特权→冲动攻击	0.02	0.02	[-0.013, 0.052]
中介效应4	隐性自恋→心理特权→预谋攻击	0.04	0.02	[0.006, 0.075]
中介效应5	显性自恋→特质愤怒→冲动攻击	0.18	0.06	[0.077, 0.302]
中介效应6	显性自恋→特质愤怒→预谋攻击	0.15	0.04	[0.065, 0.232]
中介效应7	显性自恋→心理特权→冲动攻击	0.02	0.02	[-0.010, 0.048]
中介效应8	显性自恋→心理特权→预谋攻击	0.03	0.02	[0.006, 0.062]
直接效应1	隐性自恋→冲动攻击	0.18	0.08	[0.035, 0.327]
直接效应2	隐性自恋→预谋攻击	0.22	0.07	[0.091, 0.349]
直接效应3	显性自恋→冲动攻击	-0.08	0.07	[-0.227, 0.063]
直接效应4	显性自恋→预谋攻击	0.06	0.07	[-0.070, 0.196]

表4总效应量及差异显著性检验

总效应	包含路径	标准化效应量	SD	95% CI
1隐性自恋预测冲动性攻击	中介效应1+中介效应3+直接效应1	0.49	0.07	[0.344, 0.630]
2隐性自恋预测预谋性攻击	中介效应2+中介效应4+直接效应2	0.49	0.07	[0.352, 0.618]
3显性自恋预测冲动性攻击	中介效应5+中介效应7+直接效应3	0.12	0.08	[-0.035, 0.265]
4显性自恋预测预谋性攻击	中介效应6+中介效应8+直接效应4	0.23	0.07	[0.092, 0.378]

表4总效应量及差异显著性检验

总效应	包含路径	标准化效应量	SD	95% CI
1隐性自恋预测冲动性攻击	中介效应1+中介效应3+直接效应1	0.49	0.07	[0.344, 0.630]
2隐性自恋预测预谋性攻击	中介效应2+中介效应4+直接效应2	0.49	0.07	[0.352, 0.618]
3显性自恋预测冲动性攻击	中介效应5+中介效应7+直接效应3	0.12	0.08	[-0.035, 0.265]
4显性自恋预测预谋性攻击	中介效应6+中介效应8+直接效应4	0.23	0.07	[0.092, 0.378]

表5挑衅组与对照组基本信息与自恋人格得分(M ± SD)

变量	挑衅组	对照组	t	p
年龄	36.02 ± 5.57	35.59 ± 6.18	0.35	0.729
学历水平	1.83 ± 0.80	1.91 ± 0.71	0.52	0.604
原判刑期(年)	19.17 ± 7.65	19.02 ± 8.14	0.09	0.929
服刑时间(年)	5.84 ± 3.36	5.39 ± 3.92	0.57	0.567
显性自恋	1.93 ± 1.71	1.84 ± 1.71	0.26	0.795
隐性自恋	26.89 ± 5.31	25.45 ± 6.59	1.14	0.259

表5挑衅组与对照组基本信息与自恋人格得分(M ± SD)

变量	挑衅组	对照组	t	p
年龄	36.02 ± 5.57	35.59 ± 6.18	0.35	0.729
学历水平	1.83 ± 0.80	1.91 ± 0.71	0.52	0.604
原判刑期(年)	19.17 ± 7.65	19.02 ± 8.14	0.09	0.929
服刑时间(年)	5.84 ± 3.36	5.39 ± 3.92	0.57	0.567
显性自恋	1.93 ± 1.71	1.84 ± 1.71	0.26	0.795
隐性自恋	26.89 ± 5.31	25.45 ± 6.59	1.14	0.259

表6描述性统计及操纵检验(M ± SD)

变量	挑衅组	对照组	t	p	Cohen’d
敌意认知	14.93 ± 4.89	12.45 ± 4.48	2.50	0.014	0.53
负性情绪	19.00 ± 6.39	16.14 ± 4.81	2.39	0.019	0.51
威胁感	10.41 ± 4.45	8.30 ± 3.37	2.54	0.013	0.53
攻击行为	0.12 ± 2.01	-0.71 ± 1.25	2.33	0.022	0.50

表6描述性统计及操纵检验(M ± SD)

变量	挑衅组	对照组	t	p	Cohen’d
敌意认知	14.93 ± 4.89	12.45 ± 4.48	2.50	0.014	0.53
负性情绪	19.00 ± 6.39	16.14 ± 4.81	2.39	0.019	0.51
威胁感	10.41 ± 4.45	8.30 ± 3.37	2.54	0.013	0.53
攻击行为	0.12 ± 2.01	-0.71 ± 1.25	2.33	0.022	0.50

图3挑衅调节显性自恋与攻击关系的简单斜率图(总效应)
图3挑衅调节显性自恋与攻击关系的简单斜率图(总效应)



图4挑衅调节显性自恋与负性情绪关系的简单斜率图
图4挑衅调节显性自恋与负性情绪关系的简单斜率图



图5挑衅调节显性自恋与威胁感关系的简单斜率图
图5挑衅调节显性自恋与威胁感关系的简单斜率图

参考文献 50

[1]	American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
[2]	Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 27-51.
[3]	Bai, Y., & Wang, J. N. (2018). Reliability and validity of psychological entitlement scale in Chinese college students. Psychology: Techniques and Applications, 6(12), 752-759
	[ 白杨, 王佳宁. (2018). 心理特权量表在中国大学生群体中的信效度. 心理技术与应用, 6(12), 752-759.]
[4]	Barry, T. D., Thompson, A., Barry, C. T., Lochman, J. E., & Hill, K. (2007). The importance of narcissism in predicting proactive and reactive aggression in moderately to highly aggressive children. Aggressive Behavior, 33(3), 185-197. doi: 10.1002/ab.20198URLpmid: 17444525
[5]	Baughman, H. M., Dearing, S., Giammarco, E., & Vernon, P. A. (2012). Relationships between bullying behaviours and the dark triad: A study with adults. Personality & Individual Differences, 52(5), 571-575.
[6]	Buckels, E. E., Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). Behavioral confirmation of everyday sadism. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2201-2209. doi: 10.1177/0956797613490749URLpmid: 24022650
[7]	Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 219-229. URLpmid: 9686460
[8]	Bushman, B. J., Baumeister, R. F., Thomaes, S., Ryu, E., & West, S. G. (2009). Looking again, and harder, for a link between low self-esteem and aggression. Journal of Personality, 77(2), 427-446. URLpmid: 19192074
[9]	Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83(1), 29-45.
[10]	Chabrol, H., van Leeuwen, N., Rodgers, R., & Séjourné, N. (2009). Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency. Personality & Individual Differences, 47(7), 734-739.
[11]	Chen, G. M. (2015). Losing face on social media: Threats to positive face lead to an indirect effect on retaliatory aggression through negative affect. Communication Research, 42(6), 819-838.
[12]	Chester, D. S., & Lasko, E. N. (2019). Validating a standardized approach to the Taylor aggression paradigm. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(5), 620-631.
[13]	Fossati, A., Borroni, S., Eisenberg, N., & Maffei, C. (2010). Relations of proactive and reactive dimensions of aggression to overt and covert narcissism in nonclinical adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 36(1), 21-27. URLpmid: 19918915
[14]	Garofalo, C., & Velotti, P. (2017). Negative emotionality and aggression in violent offenders: The moderating role of emotion dysregulation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 51, 9-16.
[15]	Gentile, B., Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Reidy, D. E., Zeichner, A., & Campbell, W. K. (2013). A test of two brief measures of grandiose narcissism: The Narcissistic Personality Inventory-13 and the Narcissistic Personality Inventory-16. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1120-1136. doi: 10.1037/a0033192URLpmid: 23815119
[16]	Giacomin, M., & Jordan, C. H. (2014). Down-regulating narcissistic tendencies: Communal focus reduces state narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(4), 488-500. doi: 10.1177/0146167213516635URLpmid: 24345714
[17]	Hart, W., Adams, J. M., Burton, K. A., & Tortoriello, G. K. (2017). Narcissism and self-presentation: Profiling grandiose and vulnerable narcissists' self-presentation tactic use. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 48-57.
[18]	Hart, W., Adams, J. M., & Tortoriello, G. K. (2017). Narcissistic responses to provocation: An examination of the rage and threatened-egotism accounts. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 152-156.
[19]	Hayes, A. F.(2017) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, USA: Guilford Press.
[20]	Hendin, H. M., & Cheek, J. M. (1997). Assessing hypersensitive narcissism: A reexamination of Murray's narcism scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(4), 588-599.
[21]	Hou, L. L., Jiang, Q., Wang, H. Z., & Li, C. R. (2017). The relationship between trait anger and aggressive behavior: Based on the perspective of the integrative cognitive model. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(12), 1548-1558.
	[ 侯璐璐, 江琦, 王焕贞, 李长燃. (2017). 特质愤怒对攻击行为的影响: 基于综合认知模型的视角. 心理学报, 49(12), 1548-1558.]
[22]	Huang, L., Yang, T. Z., & Ji, Z. M. (2003). Applicability of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale in Chinese. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 17(1), 56-58.
	[ 黄丽, 杨廷忠, 季忠民. (2003). 正性负性情绪量表的中国人群适用性研究. 中国心理卫生杂志17(1), 56-58.]
[23]	Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Different provocations trigger aggression in narcissists and psychopaths. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(1), 12-18.
[24]	Krizan, Z., & Johar, O. (2015). Narcissistic rage revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(5), 784-801. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000013URLpmid: 25545840
[25]	Lambe, S., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C., Garner, E., & Walker, J. (2018). The role of narcissism in aggression and violence: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(2), 209-230. doi: 10.1177/1524838016650190URLpmid: 27222500
[26]	Li, J.-B., Nie, Y.-G., Boardley, I. D., Dou, K., & Situ, Q.M. (2015). When do normative beliefs about aggression predict aggressive behavior? An application of I3 theory. Aggressive Behavior, 41(6), 544-555. doi: 10.1002/ab.21594URLpmid: 26075351
[27]	Li, C., Sun, Y., Ho, M. Y., You, J., Shaver, P. R., & Wang, Z. (2016). State narcissism and aggression: The mediating roles of anger and hostile attributional bias. Aggressive Behavior, 42(4), 333-345. doi: 10.1002/ab.21629URLpmid: 27283271
[28]	Liu, Y. P., Zhao, H., Li, S. S., Zhang, Z., & Yang, B. (2019). The neurobiological evidence of antisocial personality disorder and its judicial implications. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(10), 1726-1742.
	[ 刘宇平, 赵辉, 李姗珊, 张卓, 杨波. (2019). 反社会人格障碍的神经生物学基础及其司法启示. 心理科学进展27(10), 1726-1742.]
[29]	Luo, Y. L., & Zhang, D. J. (2011). Experimental study of attentional bias to negative emotion facial expressions in high trait anger individuals. Journal of Psychological Science, 34(2):322-327.
	[ 罗亚莉, 张大均. (2011). 高特质愤怒个体对负性情绪面孔注意偏向的实验研究. 心理科学, 34(2), 322-327.]
[30]	Maples, J. L., Lamkin, J., & Miller, J. D. (2014). A test of two brief measures of the dark triad: The Dirty Dozen and Short Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 326-331. doi: 10.1037/a0035084URLpmid: 24274044
[31]	Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Campbell, W. K. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013-1042. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00711.xURLpmid: 21204843
[32]	Miller, J. D., & Maples, J. (2012). Trait personality models of narcissistic personality disorder, grandiose narcissism, and vulnerable narcissism. The Handbook of Narcissism and Narcissistic Personality Disorder. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[33]	Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556-563.
[34]	Qiao, Y., Xie, B., & Zhang, M. D. (2009). The Chinese version of impulsive-premeditated aggression scale in adolescents with aggression: Its reliability and validity. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical and Brain Science, 18(04), 366-368.
	[ 乔屹, 谢斌, 张明岛. (2009). 冲动-预谋性攻击行为量表中文版的信效度检验. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 18(4), 366-368.]
[35]	Qin, F., & Xu, F. (2013). Review on the studies of the dark triad. Advances in Psychological Science, 21(7), 1248-1261.
	[ 秦峰, 许芳. (2013). 黑暗人格三合一研究述评. 心理科学进展, 21(7), 1248-1261.]
[36]	Rasmussen, K.(2016). Entitled vengeance: A meta-analysis relating narcissism to provoked aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 42(4), 362-379. URLpmid: 26522921
[37]	Rauthmann, J.f. (2012). The dark triad and interpersonal perception: Similarities and differences in the social consequences of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 3(4), 487-496.
[38]	Reidy, D. E., Foster, J. D., & Zeichner, A. (2010). Narcissism and unprovoked aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 36(6), 414-422. URLpmid: 20623495
[39]	Reidy, D. E., Zeichner, A., Foster, J. D., & Martinez, M. A. (2008). Effects of narcissistic entitlement and exploitativeness on human physical aggression. Personality & Individual Differences, 44(4), 865-875.
[40]	Schoenleber, M., Sadeh, N., & Verona, E. (2011). Parallel syndromes: Two dimensions of narcissism and the facets of psychopathic personality in criminally involved individuals. Personality Disorders, 2(2), 113-127. URLpmid: 22448731
[41]	Spielberger, C. D. (1988). State-trait anger expression inventory (STAXI) (Research edition). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
[42]	Stanford, M. S., Houston, R. J., Mathias, C. W., Villemarette- Pittman, N. R., Helfritz, L. E., & Conklin, S. M. (2003). Characterizing aggressive behavior. Assessment, 10(2), 183-190. doi: 10.1177/1073191103010002009URLpmid: 12801190
[43]	van Harreveld, F., van der Pligt, J., Claassen, L., & van Dijk, W. W. (2007). Inmate emotion coping and psychological and physical well-being: The use of crying over spilled milk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(5), 697-708.
[44]	Wang, X. Y. (2008). A study on the influence of college students' narcissistic personality on self-esteem and subjective well-being.(Unpublished master's thesis). Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
	[ 王晓燕. (2008). 大学生自恋人格对自尊和主观幸福感的影响研究 (硕士学位论文). 陕西师范大学, 西安.]
[45]	Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The panas scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063URLpmid: 3397865
[46]	Wink, P.(1991). Two faces of narcissism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 61(4), 590-597. URLpmid: 1960651
[47]	Wu, Y., & Wen, Z. L.(2011). Item parceling strategies in structural equation modeling. Advances in Psychological Science, 19(12):1859-1867.
	[ 吴艳, 温忠麟. (2011). 结构方程建模中的题目打包策略. 心理科学进展, 19(12), 1859-1867.]
[48]	Yang, C. C., Li, C. N., Wang, Z. H., & Bian, Y. F. (2016). The mediational roles of perceived threat, anger, and hostile attribution bias between state narcissism and aggression. Psychological Development and Education, 32(02), 236-245.
	[ 杨晨晨, 李彩娜, 王振宏, 边玉芳. (2016). 状态自恋与攻击行为——知觉到的威胁、愤怒情绪和敌意归因偏差的多重中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 32(02), 236-245.]
[49]	Yu, Z. K., Liu, Y. Z., Luo, Y., & Cai, H. J. (2019). Adaptive narcissism and maladaptive narcissism: Diverse evidences for the distinction. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(1), 96-105.
	[ 余震坤, 刘云芝, 罗宇, 蔡华俭. (2019). 区分适应性自恋和非适应性自恋: 多视角的证据. 心理科学进展, 27(1), 96-105.]
[50]	Zhou, H., & Long, L. R. (2004). Statistical remedies for common method biases. Advances in Psychological Science, 12(6):942-950.
	[ 周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.]

相关文章 15

[1]	李芮, 夏凌翔. 攻击动机对特质愤怒与反应性攻击关系的中介作用：一项纵向研究[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(7): 788-797.
[2]	宋锡妍, 程亚华, 谢周秀甜, 龚楠焰, 刘雷. 愤怒情绪对延迟折扣的影响：确定感和控制感的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 456-468.
[3]	侯娟, 朱英格, 方晓义. 手机成瘾与抑郁：社交焦虑和负性情绪信息注意偏向的多重中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(4): 362-373.
[4]	苗晓燕, 孙欣, 匡仪, 汪祚军. 共患难, 更同盟：共同经历相同负性情绪事件促进合作行为[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(1): 81-94.
[5]	任志洪, 赵子仪, 余香莲, 赵春晓, 张琳, 林羽中, 张微. 睾酮素与反社会倾向未成年犯的攻击行为：敌意注意偏向的中介和皮质醇的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(11): 1288-1300.
[6]	黄潇潇,张宝山,张媛,麻雨婷. 元刻板印象对随迁儿童攻击行为的效应及挫折感的中介作用 *[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(4): 484-496.
[7]	房俨然,魏薇,罗萍,刘晓东,施俊琦,战宇杰. 员工负性情绪对情绪劳动策略的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(3): 353-365.
[8]	张丹丹,刘珍莉,陈钰,买晓琴. 右腹外侧前额叶对高抑郁水平成年人社会情绪调节的作用：一项tDCS研究[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(2): 207-2015.
[9]	张丹丹,蔺义芹,柳昀哲,罗跃嘉,蒋冬红. 厌恶与恐惧面孔的记忆编码、保持、提取[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(1): 36-47.
[10]	金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 乌云特娜, 金祥忠. 暴力环境接触对大学生网络攻击行为的影响：反刍思维与网络道德的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 1051-1060.
[11]	江琦,侯璐璐,邱江,李长燃,王焕贞. 尾状核-眶部内侧前额叶的功能连接与反应性攻击的关系：基于静息态功能磁共振研究[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(6): 655-666.
[12]	王益文, 付超, 任相峰, 林羽中, 郭丰波, 张 振, 黄亮, 袁博, 郑玉玮. 自恋人格调节信任博弈的结果评价[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(8): 1080-1088.
[13]	王端旭, 曾恺, 郑显伟. 员工非伦理行为如何招致同事攻击：道义公正视角[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(6): 829-840.
[14]	侯璐璐, 江琦, 王焕贞, 李长燃. 特质愤怒对攻击行为的影响： 基于综合认知模型的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(12): 1548-1558.
[15]	衡书鹏, 周宗奎, 牛更枫, 刘庆奇. 虚拟化身对攻击性的启动效应：游戏暴力性、玩家性别的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(11): 1460-1472.

PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4893