山东师范大学儿童青少年发展研究院, 山东师范大学心理学院, 济南 250014
收稿日期:
2020-05-12出版日期:
2021-02-25发布日期:
2020-12-29通讯作者:
张文新E-mail:zhangwenxin@sdnu.edu.cn基金资助:
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(17JZD058);国家自然科学基金(31860280);国家自然科学基金(31971008)Healthy context paradox in the association between bullying victimization and externalizing problems: The mediating role of hostile attribution bias
LIU Xiaowei, PAN Bin, CHEN Liang, LI Tengfei, JI Linqin, ZHANG Wenxin()Research Institute of Child and Adolescent Development, School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China
Received:
2020-05-12Online:
2021-02-25Published:
2020-12-29Contact:
ZHANG Wenxin E-mail:zhangwenxin@sdnu.edu.cn摘要/Abstract
摘要: “健康环境悖论”是指在总体受欺负水平较低的环境中, 受欺负的个体会表现出更多适应问题。本研究以来自47个班级的1764名5年级到8年级学生为被试(男生956人, 平均年龄14.46岁), 考察了班级平均受欺负水平在个体受欺负经历与外化问题间的调节作用及敌意性归因的中介作用。结果发现:(1)受欺负与外化问题的关系存在“健康环境悖论”现象, 即班级平均受欺负水平能调节个体受欺负经历与外化问题的关系, 在班级平均受欺负水平较低的班级中受欺负经历与外化问题的关联更强; (2)班级平均受欺负水平对受欺负与外化问题的调节作用通过敌意性归因的中介作用实现。本研究证实了受欺负与外化问题的健康环境悖论现象, 并首次揭示了敌意性归因的中介作用机制。
图/表 5
图1班级平均受欺负水平会影响受欺负个体外化问题的作用机制
图1班级平均受欺负水平会影响受欺负个体外化问题的作用机制
表1个体水平与班级水平变量的平均数、标准差与相关系数
变量 | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
个体水平 | |||||||
1 性别 | — | — | — | ||||
2 母亲受教育水平 | 3.81 | 1.20 | 0.01 | — | |||
3 父亲受教育水平 | 3.99 | 1.22 | 0.02 | 0.73** | — | ||
4 受欺负水平 | 0.38 | 0.60 | -0.10** | -0.05* | -0.04 | — | |
5 敌意性归因 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.04 | -0.02 | -0.02 | 0.31** | — |
6 外化问题 | 0.18 | 0.20 | -0.07** | -0.02 | -0.05 | 0.28** | 0.26** |
班级水平 | |||||||
1 年级 | — | — | — | ||||
2 班级规模 | 39.67 | 8.19 | 0.53*** | — | |||
3 班级平均受欺负水平 | 0.38 | 0.13 | -0.31*** | -0.03 | — |
表1个体水平与班级水平变量的平均数、标准差与相关系数
变量 | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
个体水平 | |||||||
1 性别 | — | — | — | ||||
2 母亲受教育水平 | 3.81 | 1.20 | 0.01 | — | |||
3 父亲受教育水平 | 3.99 | 1.22 | 0.02 | 0.73** | — | ||
4 受欺负水平 | 0.38 | 0.60 | -0.10** | -0.05* | -0.04 | — | |
5 敌意性归因 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.04 | -0.02 | -0.02 | 0.31** | — |
6 外化问题 | 0.18 | 0.20 | -0.07** | -0.02 | -0.05 | 0.28** | 0.26** |
班级水平 | |||||||
1 年级 | — | — | — | ||||
2 班级规模 | 39.67 | 8.19 | 0.53*** | — | |||
3 班级平均受欺负水平 | 0.38 | 0.13 | -0.31*** | -0.03 | — |
表2多水平结构方程模型
因变量 | M1: 个体水平模型 | M2: 班级水平模型 | M3: 有中介的调节模型 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
外化问题 | 外化问题 | 敌意性归因 | 外化问题 | |
截距 | 0.191*** | 0.168*** | 0.198*** | 0.162*** |
个体水平 | ||||
性别 | -0.018* | -0.016 | 0.038*** | -0.022** |
父亲受教育水平 | 0.002 | 0.001 | -0.001 | 0.002* |
母亲受教育水平 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 |
个体受欺负水平 | 0.081*** | 0.068*** | 0.165*** | 0.041** |
敌意性归因 | 0.161*** | |||
班级水平 | ||||
年级 | 0.048** | -0.049 | 0.049** | |
班级规模 | -0.002 | 0.000 | -0.002* | |
班级平均受欺负水平 | 0.094 | 0.135* | 0.096 | |
跨层调节 | ||||
年级×个体受欺负水平 | 0.073* | -0.049 | 0.081** | |
班级规模×受欺负水平 | -0.001 | 0.002 | -0.001 | |
班级平均受欺负水平×个体受欺负水平 | -0.263* | -0.470*** | -0.186 | |
随机效应 | ||||
σ2 | 0.036*** | 0.033*** | 0.041*** | 0.032*** |
τ00 | 0.002* | 0.001* | 0.198*** | 0.001* |
τ11 | 0.004** | 0.165 | 0.004** |
表2多水平结构方程模型
因变量 | M1: 个体水平模型 | M2: 班级水平模型 | M3: 有中介的调节模型 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
外化问题 | 外化问题 | 敌意性归因 | 外化问题 | |
截距 | 0.191*** | 0.168*** | 0.198*** | 0.162*** |
个体水平 | ||||
性别 | -0.018* | -0.016 | 0.038*** | -0.022** |
父亲受教育水平 | 0.002 | 0.001 | -0.001 | 0.002* |
母亲受教育水平 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 |
个体受欺负水平 | 0.081*** | 0.068*** | 0.165*** | 0.041** |
敌意性归因 | 0.161*** | |||
班级水平 | ||||
年级 | 0.048** | -0.049 | 0.049** | |
班级规模 | -0.002 | 0.000 | -0.002* | |
班级平均受欺负水平 | 0.094 | 0.135* | 0.096 | |
跨层调节 | ||||
年级×个体受欺负水平 | 0.073* | -0.049 | 0.081** | |
班级规模×受欺负水平 | -0.001 | 0.002 | -0.001 | |
班级平均受欺负水平×个体受欺负水平 | -0.263* | -0.470*** | -0.186 | |
随机效应 | ||||
σ2 | 0.036*** | 0.033*** | 0.041*** | 0.032*** |
τ00 | 0.002* | 0.001* | 0.198*** | 0.001* |
τ11 | 0.004** | 0.165 | 0.004** |
图2班级平均受欺负水平调节受欺负与外化问题的关系
图2班级平均受欺负水平调节受欺负与外化问题的关系
图3班级平均受欺负水平调节受欺负与敌意性归因的关系
图3班级平均受欺负水平调节受欺负与敌意性归因的关系
参考文献 61
[1] | Achenbach, T. M. (1985). Assessment and taxonomy of child and adolescent psychopathology. Sage Publications, Inc. |
[2] | Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles: An integrated system of multi-informant assessment. ASEBA. |
[3] | Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. |
[4] | Bellmore, A. D., Witkow, M. R., Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (2004). Beyond the individual: The impact of ethnic context and classroom behavioral norms on victims’ adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 1159-1172. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1159 doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1159URLpmid: 15535764 |
[5] | Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Barker, E. D., Girard, A., Dionne, G., Tremblay, R. E., & Boivin, M. (2013). Do other people’s plights matter? A genetically informed twin study of the role of social context in the link between peer victimization and children’s aggression and depression symptoms. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 327-340. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025665 doi: 10.1037/a0025665URLpmid: 21967566 |
[6] | Broidy, L. M., Nagin, D. S., Tremblay, R. E., Bates, J. E., Brame, B., Dodge, K. A., … Vitaro, F. (2003). Developmental trajectories of childhood disruptive behaviors and adolescent delinquency: A six-site, cross-national study. Developmental Psychology, 39(2), 222-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.2.222 doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.39.2.222URLpmid: 12661883 |
[7] | Cao, C., Wang, M. P., Zhang, W. X., Ji, L. Q., Chen, L., & Chen, X. Y. (2014). Interaction between COMT gene rs6267 polymorphism and maternal parenting behavior on adolescents’ physical and relational aggression. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(10), 1486-1497. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.01486 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.01486URL |
[ 曹丛, 王美萍, 张文新, 纪林芹, 陈亮, 陈欣银. (2014). COMT基因rs6267多态性与母亲教养行为对青少年身体攻击和关系攻击的交互作用. 心理学报, 46(10), 1486-1497. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.01486] | |
[8] | Casper, D. M., & Card, N. A. (2017). Overt and relational victimization: A meta-analytic review of their overlap and associations with social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 88(2), 466-483. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12621 URLpmid: 27709610 |
[9] | Chen, G. H., Zhang, W. X., & Wang, S. Q. (2009). Agreement among different informants over ratings of adolescent externalizing behaviors. Acta Pcychologica Sinica, 41(2), 144-155. |
[ 陈光辉, 张文新, 王姝琼. (2009). 多主体评定青少年外化问题行为的一致性问题. 心理学报, 41(2), 144-155.] | |
[10] | Chen, J., Yu, J., Zhang, J., Li, X., & McGue, M. (2015). Investigating genetic and environmental contributions to adolescent externalizing behavior in a collectivistic culture: A multi-informant twin study. Psychological Medicine, 45(9), 1989-1997. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714003109 doi: 10.1017/S0033291714003109URLpmid: 25572795 |
[11] | Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74-101. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74URL |
[12] | Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., & Lynam, D. (2006). Aggression and antisocial behavior in youth. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3: Social, emotional, personality development )6th ed., pp. 719-788). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. |
[13] | Garandeau, C. F., Lee, I. A., & Salmivalli, C. (2018). Decreases in the proportion of bullying victims in the classroom: Effects on the adjustment of remaining victims. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(1), 64-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025416667492 doi: 10.1177/0165025416667492URL |
[14] | Garandeau, C. F., & Salmivalli, C. (2019). Can healthier contexts be harmful? A new perspective on the plight of victims of bullying. Child Development Perspectives, 13(3), 147-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12331 doi: 10.1111/cdep.2019.13.issue-3URL |
[15] | Gerber, J. P., Wheeler, L., & Suls, J. (2018). A social comparison theory meta-analysis 60+ years on. Psychological Bulletin, 144(2), 177-197. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000127 URLpmid: 29144145 |
[16] | Gini, G., Holt, Pozzoli, T., & Marino. (2020). Peer victimization and somatic problems: The role of class victimization levels. Journal of School Health, 90(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12844 doi: 10.1111/josh.v90.1URL |
[17] | Gregson, K. D., Tu, K. M., & Erath, S. A. (2014). Sweating under pressure: Skin conductance level reactivity moderates the association between peer victimization and externalizing behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(1), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12086 doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12086URLpmid: 23734821 |
[18] | Guy, A., Lee, K., & Wolke, D. (2017). Differences in the early stages of social information processing for adolescents involved in bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 43(6), 578-587. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21716 doi: 10.1002/ab.21716URLpmid: 28589674 |
[19] | Hoglund, W. L., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2007). Managing threat: Do social-cognitive processes mediate the link between peer victimization and adjustment problems in early adolescence? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(3), 525-540. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00533.x doi: 10.1111/jora.2007.17.issue-3URL |
[20] | Huitsing, G., Lodder, G. M. A., Oldenburg, B., Schacter, H. L., Salmivalli, C., Juvonen, J., & Veenstra, R. (2019). The healthy context paradox: Victims’ adjustment during an anti-bullying intervention. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(9), 2499-2509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1194-1 doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1194-1URL |
[21] | Huitsing, G., Veenstra, R., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). “It must be me” or “It could be them?”: The impact of the social network position of bullies and victims on victims’ adjustment. Social Networks, 34(4), 379-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.07.002URL |
[22] | Ji, L. Q., Wei, X., Chen, L., & Zhang, W. X. (2012). Peer relationship adversities and children’s aggression during late childhood: The mediating roles of self-conception and peer beliefs. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(11), 1479-1489. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.01479 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.01479URL |
[ 纪林芹, 魏星, 陈亮, 张文新. (2012). 童年晚期同伴关系不利与儿童的攻击行为: 自我概念与同伴信念的中介作用. 心理学报, 44(11), 1479-1489. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.01479] | |
[23] | Julian, M. W. (2001). The consequences of ignoring multilevel data structures in nonhierarchical covariance modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(3), 325-352. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_1 doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_1URL |
[24] | Karriker-Jaffe, K. J., L?nn, S. L., Cook, W. K., Kendler, K. S., & Sundquist, K. (2020). Young men’s behavioral competencies and risk of alcohol use disorder in emerging adulthood: Early protective effects of parental education. Development and Psychopathology, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579419001640 URLpmid: 33432895 |
[25] | Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2004). Peer victimization: The role of emotions in adaptive and maladaptive coping. Social Development, 13(3), 329-349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2004.00271.x doi: 10.1111/sode.2004.13.issue-3URL |
[26] | Lansford, J. E., Malone, P. S., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (2010). Developmental cascades of peer rejection, social information processing biases, and aggression during middle childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 22(3), 593-602. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000301 doi: 10.1017/S0954579410000301URLpmid: 20576181 |
[27] | Lei, L., Wang, Y., Guo, B. L., & Zhang, L. (2004). The influence of classroom norms on the relations between social behaviors and peer victimization. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 36(5), 563-567. |
[ 雷雳, 王燕, 郭伯良, 张雷. (2004). 班级行为范式对个体行为与受欺负关系影响的多层分析. 心理学报, 36(5), 563-567.] | |
[28] | Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Life-course-persistent and adolescence- limited antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674-701. URLpmid: 8255953 |
[29] | Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus statistical modeling software. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén. |
[30] | Nelson, D. A., Mitchell, C., & Yang, C. (2008). Intent attributions and aggression: A study of children and their parents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(6), 793-806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9211-7 doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9211-7URLpmid: 18256923 |
[31] | Nishina, A., & Juvonen, J. (2005). Daily reports of witnessing and experiencing peer harassment in middle school. Child Development, 76(2), 435-450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00855.x URLpmid: 15784092 |
[32] | Odgers, C. L., Moffitt, T. E., Broadbent, J. M., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., … Caspi, A. (2008). Female and male antisocial trajectories: From childhood origins to adult outcomes. Development and Psychopathology, 20(2), 673-716. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579408000333 doi: 10.1017/S0954579408000333URLpmid: 18423100 |
[33] | Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell. |
[34] | Perren, S., Ettekal, I., & Ladd, G. (2013). The impact of peer victimization on later maladjustment: Mediating and moderating effects of hostile and self-blaming attributions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(1), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02618.x doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02618.xURLpmid: 23057732 |
[35] | Petersen, I. T., Bates, J. E., Dodge, K. A., Lansford, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (2015). Describing and predicting developmental profiles of externalizing problems from childhood to adulthood. Development and Psychopathology, 27(3), 791-818. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000789 doi: 10.1017/S0954579414000789URLpmid: 25166430 |
[36] | Peugh, J. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 48(1), 85-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002URLpmid: 20006989 |
[37] | Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 |
[38] | Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., Boelen, P. A., van der Schoot, M., & Telch, M. J. (2011). Prospective linkages between peer victimization and externalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 37(3), 215-222. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20374 URLpmid: 21433031 |
[39] | Rudolph, K. D., Lansford, J. E., Agoston, A. M., Sugimura, N., Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., … Bates, J. E. (2014). Peer victimization and social alienation: Predicting deviant peer affiliation in middle school. Child Development, 85(1), 124-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12112 doi: 10.1111/cdev.12112URLpmid: 23621796 |
[40] | Saarento, S., Garandeau, C. F., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). Classroom- and school-level contributions to bullying and victimization: A review. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 204-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2207 |
[41] | Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007 doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007URL |
[42] | Salmivalli, C. (2018). Peer victimization and adjustment in young adulthood: Commentary on the special section. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46(1), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-017-0372-8 doi: 10.1007/s10802-017-0372-8URLpmid: 29192352 |
[43] | Schacter, H. L., & Juvonen, J. (2015). The effects of school-level victimization on self-blame: Evidence for contextualized social cognitions. Developmental Psychology, 51(6), 841-847. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000016 doi: 10.1037/dev0000016URLpmid: 25893267 |
[44] | Selig, J. P., Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2008). Latent variable structural equation modeling in cross-cultural research: Multigroup and multilevel approaches. In F. J. R. van de Vijver, D. A. van Hemert, & Y. H. Poortinga (Eds.), Multilevel Analysis of Individuals and Cultures (pp. 93-119). Mahwah: Erlbaum |
[45] | Sentse, M., Scholte, R., Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2007). Person-group dissimilarity in involvement in bullying and its relation with social status. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(6), 1009-1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9150-3 doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9150-3URLpmid: 17588201 |
[46] | Smeijers, D., Bulten, E. B. H., & Brazil, I. A. (2019). The computations of hostile biases (CHB) model: Grounding hostility biases in a unified cognitive framework. Clinical Psychology Review, 73, 101775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101775 doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101775URLpmid: 31726277 |
[47] | Sullivan, T. N., Farrell, A. D., & Kliewer, W. (2006). Peer victimization in early adolescence: Association between physical and relational victimization and drug use, aggression, and delinquent behaviors among urban middle school students. Development and Psychopathology, 18(01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S095457940606007X |
[48] | United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2019). Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. https://en.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en |
[49] | Vaillancourt, T., Brittain, H. L., McDougall, P., & Duku, E. (2013). Longitudinal links between childhood peer victimization, internalizing and externalizing problems, and academic functioning: Developmental cascades. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(8), 1203-1215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9781-5 doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9781-5URLpmid: 23907699 |
[50] | van, Lier, P. A., C., &, Koot, H., M. (2010). Developmental cascades of peer relations and symptoms of externalizing and internalizing problems from kindergarten to fourth-grade elementary school. Development and Psychopathology, 22(3), 569-582. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000283 doi: 10.1017/S0954579410000283URLpmid: 20576179 |
[51] | van Reemst, L., Fischer, T. F. C., & Zwirs, B. W. C. (2016). Social information processing mechanisms and victimization: A literature review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014557286 doi: 10.1177/1524838014557286URLpmid: 25389278 |
[52] | Verhoef, R. E. J., Alsem, S. C., Verhulp, E. E., & de Castro, B. O. (2019). Hostile intent attribution and aggressive behavior in children revisited: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 90(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13255 doi: 10.1111/cdev.13095URLpmid: 29884983 |
[53] | Visconti, K. J., Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Clifford, C. A. (2013). Children’s attributions for peer victimization: A social comparison approach. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(6), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2013.06.002 doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2013.06.002URL |
[54] | Vythilingam, M., Blair, K. S., Mccaffrey, D., Scaramozza, M., Jones, M., Nakic, M., … Blair, R. J. R. (2007). Biased emotional attention in post-traumatic stress disorder: A help as well as a hindrance? Psychological Medicine, 37(10), 1445-1455. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329170700092X doi: 10.1017/S003329170700092XURLpmid: 17559703 |
[55] | Wood, J. O. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 231-248. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.231URL |
[56] | Yeung, R. S., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2007). Does hostile attributional bias for relational provocations mediate the short-term association between relational victimization and aggression in preadolescence? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(8), 973-983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9162-2 doi: 10.1007/s10964-006-9162-2URL |
[57] | Zeng, X. R., Wang, Y., Ding, H. H., & Zhou, H. (2019). Classroom bullying norms and bullying behavior: The mediating role of fear induced by group identity and peer pressure. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(8), 935-944. https://doi.org/935-944.10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00935 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00935URL |
[ 曾欣然, 汪玥, 丁俊浩, 周晖. (2019). 班级欺凌规范与欺凌行为: 群体害怕与同辈压力的中介作用. 心理学报, 51(8), 935-944. https://doi.org/935-944.10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00935] | |
[58] | Zhang, J., Pan, B., Chen, L., Li, T. F., & Zhang, W. X. (2020). Psychometric analysis of assessment of intent attributions for ambiguous provocation situations in Chinese children and adolescents. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(2), 94-98+196. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2020.02.018 |
[ 张洁, 潘斌, 陈亮, 李腾飞, 张文新. (2020). 敌意归因问卷中文版测量学分析及初步应用. 中国临床心理学, 28(2), 94-98+196. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2020.02.018] | |
[59] | Zhang, W., Chen, L., & Chen, G. (2016). Research on bullying in mainland China. In P. Smith, K. Kwak, & Y. Toda. (Eds.), School bullying in different cultures: Eastern and western perspectives (pp. 113-132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
[60] | Zhang, W. X., Wu, J. F., & Jones, K. (1999). The revision of Olweus' children bullying questionnaire. Psychological Development and Education, 15(2), 7-11. |
[ 张文新, 武建芬, Jones, K. (1999). Olweus儿童欺负问卷中文版的修订. 心理发展与教育, 15(2), 7-11.] | |
[61] | Zhou, Z.-K., Liu, Q.-Q., Niu, G.-F., Sun, X.-J., & Fan, C.-Y. (2017). Bullying victimization and depression in Chinese children: A moderated mediation model of resilience and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 137-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.040 doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.040URL |
相关文章 4
[1] | 常淑敏,张丽娅,王玲晓. 发展资源在减少青少年外化问题行为中的累积效应及关系模式[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(11): 1244-1255. |
[2] | 陈光辉,张文新,王姝琼. 多主体评定青少年外化问题行为的一致性问题[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(02): 144-155. |
[3] | 雷雳,王燕,郭伯良,张雷. 班级行为范式对个体行为与受欺负关系影响的多层分析[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(05): 563-567. |
[4] | 张文新. 中小学生欺负/受欺负的普遍性与基本特点[J]. 心理学报, 2002, 34(04): 57-64. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4876