父母元情绪理念与青少年问题行为:迷走神经的调节作用

删除或更新信息，请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

何晓丽¹(

), 袁小龙², 胡铭³, 周丽晨¹

¹宁夏大学教育学院, 银川 750021
²山东省淄博第六中学, 淄博 255300
³宁夏中医医院暨中医研究院, 银川750021

收稿日期:2018-07-11出版日期:2020-08-25发布日期:2020-06-28
通讯作者:何晓丽E-mail:hexl@nxu.edu.cn

The association between parental meta philosophy and adolescent's behavior problem: The moderating role of vagus

HE Xiaoli¹(

), YUAN Xiaolong², HU Ming³, ZHOU Lichen¹

¹Educational Institute, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
²Shandong Zibo No.6 High School, Zibo 255300, China
³Ningxia Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yinchuan 750021, China

Received:2018-07-11Online:2020-08-25Published:2020-06-28
Contact:HE Xiaoli E-mail:hexl@nxu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探讨父母元情绪理念与青少年问题行为的关系以及青少年自身迷走神经功能对两者关系的影响。采用“心算任务范式”及问卷法, 对224名青少年及其父母进行测量与调查。结果发现:(1) 母亲情绪教导理念负向预测青少年内外化问题行为, 母亲情绪失控理念正向预测青少年内外化问题行为, 母亲情绪不干涉理念正向预测青少年外化问题行为; 父亲情绪教导理念负向预测青少年内化问题行为, 父亲情绪失控理念正向预测青少年外化问题行为。(2) 当青少年迷走张力较低时, 母亲情绪不干涉理念正向预测青少年外化问题行为; 当青少年迷走抑制较低时, 母亲情绪失控理念正向预测青少年内化、外化问题行为, 父亲情绪失控理念正向预测青少年外化问题行为。综上, 父母元情绪理念能够预测青少年问题行为, 且父母元情绪理念对青少年问题行为影响存在差异。同时, 迷走神经功能对父母元情绪理念与青少年问题行为的关系具有一定调节作用。

图/表 9

表1父母元情绪理念、迷走神经功能与问题行为的相关分析

父母元情绪理念	M ± SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11
1母亲情绪教导	65.46 ± 12.80	1
2母亲情绪不干涉	37.00 ± 8.95	-0.17^*	1
3母亲情绪摒除	24.49 ± 5.31	-0.31^***	0.24^***	1
4母亲情绪失控	26.99 ± 8.69	-0.33^***	0.25^***	0.47^***	1
5父亲情绪教导	62.36 ± 10.96	0.32^***	-0.12	-0.11	-0.11	1
6父亲情绪不干涉	36.53 ± 8.86	-0.25^***	0.33^***	0.37^***	0.29^***	-0.30^***	1
7父亲情绪摒除	24.78 ± 5.51	-0.20^**	0.20^**	0.58^***	0.29^***	-0.22^**	0.46^***	1
8父亲情绪失控	24.84 ± 7.51	-0.14^*	0.23^***	0.21^**	0.46^***	-0.22^***	0.38^***	0.28^***	1
9内化问题行为	12.25 ± 6.34	-0.23^***	0.07	0.08	0.25^***	-0.16^*	0.04	0.06	0.07	1
10外化问题行为	8.23 ± 4.53	-0.19^**	0.21^**	0.04	0.22^**	-0.09	0.07	0.10	0.21^**	0.51^***	1
11基线RSA	8.04 ± 1.03	-0.13	-0.01	0.004	0.03	0.09	-0.05	-0.11	-0.11	-0.04	-0.15^*	1
12 RSA抑制	0.35 ± 0.61	-0.03	0.001	0.05	0.09	-0.01	0.07	-0.02	0.09	-0.05	-0.15^*	0.13^*

表1父母元情绪理念、迷走神经功能与问题行为的相关分析

父母元情绪理念	M ± SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11
1母亲情绪教导	65.46 ± 12.80	1
2母亲情绪不干涉	37.00 ± 8.95	-0.17^*	1
3母亲情绪摒除	24.49 ± 5.31	-0.31^***	0.24^***	1
4母亲情绪失控	26.99 ± 8.69	-0.33^***	0.25^***	0.47^***	1
5父亲情绪教导	62.36 ± 10.96	0.32^***	-0.12	-0.11	-0.11	1
6父亲情绪不干涉	36.53 ± 8.86	-0.25^***	0.33^***	0.37^***	0.29^***	-0.30^***	1
7父亲情绪摒除	24.78 ± 5.51	-0.20^**	0.20^**	0.58^***	0.29^***	-0.22^**	0.46^***	1
8父亲情绪失控	24.84 ± 7.51	-0.14^*	0.23^***	0.21^**	0.46^***	-0.22^***	0.38^***	0.28^***	1
9内化问题行为	12.25 ± 6.34	-0.23^***	0.07	0.08	0.25^***	-0.16^*	0.04	0.06	0.07	1
10外化问题行为	8.23 ± 4.53	-0.19^**	0.21^**	0.04	0.22^**	-0.09	0.07	0.10	0.21^**	0.51^***	1
11基线RSA	8.04 ± 1.03	-0.13	-0.01	0.004	0.03	0.09	-0.05	-0.11	-0.11	-0.04	-0.15^*	1
12 RSA抑制	0.35 ± 0.61	-0.03	0.001	0.05	0.09	-0.01	0.07	-0.02	0.09	-0.05	-0.15^*	0.13^*

表2母亲元情绪理念、基线迷走神经张力与青少年问题行为关系的回归分析

因变量	步骤	自变量	R2	ΔR2	F	β	t
内化问题行为	第一步	性别				-0.15	-2.31^*
		年龄	0.02	0.02	2.76	-0.02	-0.31
	第二步	情绪教导				-0.16	-2.37^*
		情绪失控				0.20	2.89^**
		基线RSA	0.11	0.09	5.38^***	-0.05	-0.77
	第三步	情绪教导×基线RSA				0.02	0.23
		情绪失控×基线RSA	0.11	0.001	3.84^***	-0.02	-0.26
外化问题行为	第一步	性别				0.13	2.01^*
		年龄	0.02	0.02	2.04	0.004	0.06
	第二步	情绪教导				-0.16	-2.34^*
		情绪不干涉				0.13	1.98^*
		情绪失控				0.14	2.02^*
		基线RSA	0.14	0.12	5.65^***	-0.18	-2.87^**
	第三步	情绪教导×基线RSA				0.06	0.85
		情绪不干涉×基线RSA				-0.15	-2.26^*
		情绪失控×基线RSA	0.16	0.02	4.49^***	0.06	0.80

表2母亲元情绪理念、基线迷走神经张力与青少年问题行为关系的回归分析

因变量	步骤	自变量	R2	ΔR2	F	β	t
内化问题行为	第一步	性别				-0.15	-2.31^*
		年龄	0.02	0.02	2.76	-0.02	-0.31
	第二步	情绪教导				-0.16	-2.37^*
		情绪失控				0.20	2.89^**
		基线RSA	0.11	0.09	5.38^***	-0.05	-0.77
	第三步	情绪教导×基线RSA				0.02	0.23
		情绪失控×基线RSA	0.11	0.001	3.84^***	-0.02	-0.26
外化问题行为	第一步	性别				0.13	2.01^*
		年龄	0.02	0.02	2.04	0.004	0.06
	第二步	情绪教导				-0.16	-2.34^*
		情绪不干涉				0.13	1.98^*
		情绪失控				0.14	2.02^*
		基线RSA	0.14	0.12	5.65^***	-0.18	-2.87^**
	第三步	情绪教导×基线RSA				0.06	0.85
		情绪不干涉×基线RSA				-0.15	-2.26^*
		情绪失控×基线RSA	0.16	0.02	4.49^***	0.06	0.80

图1基线RSA对母亲情绪不干涉与外化问题行为关系的调节作用

图1基线RSA对母亲情绪不干涉与外化问题行为关系的调节作用

表3父亲元情绪理念、基线迷走神经张力与青少年问题行为关系的回归分析

因变量	步骤	自变量	R2	ΔR2	F	β	t
内化问题行为	第一步	性别				-0.15	-2.31^*
		年龄	0.02	0.02	2.76	-0.02	-0.31
	第二步	情绪教导				-0.14	-2.09^*
		基线RSA	0.04	0.02	2.51^*	-0.01	-0.14
	第三步	情绪教导×基线RSA	0.05	0.01	2.30^*	0.08	1.20
外化问题行为	第一步	性别				0.13	2.01^*
		年龄	0.02	0.02	2.04	0.004	0.06
	第二步	情绪失控				0.18	2.80^**
		基线RSA	0.08	0.06	4.53^**	-0.14	-2.11^*
	第三步	情绪失控×基线RSA	0.08	0.01	3.97^**	0.08	1.29

表3父亲元情绪理念、基线迷走神经张力与青少年问题行为关系的回归分析

因变量	步骤	自变量	R2	ΔR2	F	β	t
内化问题行为	第一步	性别				-0.15	-2.31^*
		年龄	0.02	0.02	2.76	-0.02	-0.31
	第二步	情绪教导				-0.14	-2.09^*
		基线RSA	0.04	0.02	2.51^*	-0.01	-0.14
	第三步	情绪教导×基线RSA	0.05	0.01	2.30^*	0.08	1.20
外化问题行为	第一步	性别				0.13	2.01^*
		年龄	0.02	0.02	2.04	0.004	0.06
	第二步	情绪失控				0.18	2.80^**
		基线RSA	0.08	0.06	4.53^**	-0.14	-2.11^*
	第三步	情绪失控×基线RSA	0.08	0.01	3.97^**	0.08	1.29

表4母亲元情绪理念、迷走神经抑制与青少年问题行为关系的回归分析

因变量	步骤	自变量	R2	ΔR2	F	β	t
内化问题行为	第一步	性别				-0.15	-2.31^*
		年龄	0.02	0.02	2.76	-0.02	-0.31
	第二步	情绪教导				-0.16	-2.30^*
		情绪失控				0.20	2.98^**
		RSA抑制	0.11	0.08	5.49^***	-0.07	-1.04
	第三步	情绪教导×RSA抑制				-0.02	-0.23
		情绪失控×RSA抑制	0.15	0.04	5.36^***	-0.20	-2.85^**
外化问题行为	第一步	性别				0.13	2.01^*
		年龄	0.02	0.02	2.04	0.004	0.06
	第二步	情绪教导				-0.13	-1.98^*
		情绪不干涉				0.13	2.03^*
		情绪失控				0.16	2.27^*
		RSA抑制	0.13	0.12	5.58^***	-0.18	-2.79^**
	第三步	情绪教导×RSA抑制				-0.05	-0.78
		情绪不干涉×RSA抑制				0.001	0.02
		情绪失控×RSA抑制	0.19	0.05	5.39^***	-0.25	-3.44^***

表4母亲元情绪理念、迷走神经抑制与青少年问题行为关系的回归分析

因变量	步骤	自变量	R2	ΔR2	F	β	t
内化问题行为	第一步	性别				-0.15	-2.31^*
		年龄	0.02	0.02	2.76	-0.02	-0.31
	第二步	情绪教导				-0.16	-2.30^*
		情绪失控				0.20	2.98^**
		RSA抑制	0.11	0.08	5.49^***	-0.07	-1.04
	第三步	情绪教导×RSA抑制				-0.02	-0.23
		情绪失控×RSA抑制	0.15	0.04	5.36^***	-0.20	-2.85^**
外化问题行为	第一步	性别				0.13	2.01^*
		年龄	0.02	0.02	2.04	0.004	0.06
	第二步	情绪教导				-0.13	-1.98^*
		情绪不干涉				0.13	2.03^*
		情绪失控				0.16	2.27^*
		RSA抑制	0.13	0.12	5.58^***	-0.18	-2.79^**
	第三步	情绪教导×RSA抑制				-0.05	-0.78
		情绪不干涉×RSA抑制				0.001	0.02
		情绪失控×RSA抑制	0.19	0.05	5.39^***	-0.25	-3.44^***

图2RSA抑制对母亲情绪失控与内化问题行为关系的调节作用

图3RSA抑制对母亲情绪失控与外化问题行为关系的调节作用

图3RSA抑制对母亲情绪失控与外化问题行为关系的调节作用

表5父亲元情绪理念、迷走神经抑制与青少年问题行为关系的回归分析

因变量	步骤	自变量	R2	ΔR2	F	β	t
内化问题行为	第一步	性别				-0.15	-2.31^*
		年龄	0.02	0.02	2.76	-0.02	-0.31
	第二步	情绪教导				-0.14	-2.12^*
		RSA抑制	0.05	0.02	2.62^*	-0.05	-0.68
	第三步	情绪教导×RSA抑制	0.05	0.001	2.15	0.04	0.55
外化问题行为	第一步	性别				0.13	2.01^*
		年龄	0.02	0.02	2.03	0.004	0.06
	第二步	情绪失控				0.22	3.30^**
		RSA抑制	0.09	0.07	5.33^***	-0.18	-2.73^**
	第三步	情绪失控×RSA抑制	0.11	0.02	5.55^***	-0.16	-2.44^*

表5父亲元情绪理念、迷走神经抑制与青少年问题行为关系的回归分析

因变量	步骤	自变量	R2	ΔR2	F	β	t
内化问题行为	第一步	性别				-0.15	-2.31^*
		年龄	0.02	0.02	2.76	-0.02	-0.31
	第二步	情绪教导				-0.14	-2.12^*
		RSA抑制	0.05	0.02	2.62^*	-0.05	-0.68
	第三步	情绪教导×RSA抑制	0.05	0.001	2.15	0.04	0.55
外化问题行为	第一步	性别				0.13	2.01^*
		年龄	0.02	0.02	2.03	0.004	0.06
	第二步	情绪失控				0.22	3.30^**
		RSA抑制	0.09	0.07	5.33^***	-0.18	-2.73^**
	第三步	情绪失控×RSA抑制	0.11	0.02	5.55^***	-0.16	-2.44^*

图4RSA抑制对父亲情绪失控与外化问题行为关系的调节作用

参考文献 45

[1]	Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1987). Manual for the youth self-report and profile. Burlington, VT: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.
[2]	Bai, L., Ma, H., Huang, Y. X., & Luo, Y. J. (2005). The Development of native Chinese affective picture system: A pretest in 46 college students. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 19 (11), 719-722.
	[ 白露, 马慧, 黄宇霞, 罗跃嘉. (2005). 中国情绪图片系统的编制——在46名中国大学生中的试用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 19 (11), 719-722.]
[3]	Brosschot, J. F., & Thayer, J. F. (1998). Anger inhibition, cardiovascular recovery, and vagal function: A model of the link between hostility and cardiovascular disease. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 20(4), 326-332. doi: 10.1007/BF02886382 URLpmid: 10234427
[4]	Calkins, S. D., & Fox, N. A. (2002). Self-regulatory processes in early personality development: A multilevel approach to the study of childhood social withdrawal and aggression. Development and psychopathology, 14(3), 477-498. doi: 10.1017/s095457940200305x URLpmid: 12349870
[5]	Chaplin, T. M., Cole, P. M., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2005). Parental socialization of emotion expression: Gender differences and relations to child adjustment. Emotion, 5 (1), 80-88. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.80 URLpmid: 15755221
[6]	Chen, X., & French, D. C. (2008). Children's social competence in cultural context. Annual Review of Psychology, 59 (1), 591-616.
[7]	Eisenberg, N., Valiente, C., Spinrad, T. L., Cumberland, A. J., Liew, J., Reiser, M., … Losoya, S. H. (2009). Longitudinal relations of children's effortful control, impulsivity, and negative emotionality to their externalizing, internalizing, and co-occurring behavior problems. Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 988-1008. doi: 10.1037/a0016213 URLpmid: 19586175
[8]	El-Sheikh, M. (2005). Does poor vagal tone exacerbate child maladjustment in the context of parental problem drinking? A longitudinal examination. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114 (4), 735-741. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.735 URLpmid: 16351394
[9]	Gilliom, M., & Shaw, D. S. (2004). Codevelopment of externalizing and internalizing problems in early childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 16(2), 313-333. doi: 10.1017/s0954579404044530 URLpmid: 15487598
[10]	Gottman, J. M., Katz, L. F., & Hooven, C. (1996). Parental meta-emotion philosophy and the emotional life of families: Theoretical models and preliminary data. Journal of Family Psychology, 10 (3), 243-268.
[11]	Gottman, J. M., Katz, L. F., & Hooven, C. (1997). Meta-emotion: How families communicate emotionally. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[12]	Gottman, J. M., & Katz, L. F. (2002). Children's emotional reactions to stressful parent-child interactions: The link between emotion regulation and vagal tone. Marriage & Family Review, 34 (3-4), 265-283.
[13]	Graziano, P., & Derefinko, K. (2013). Cardiac vagal control and children's adaptive functioning: A meta-analysis. Biological Psychology, 94 (1), 22-37. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.04.011 URLpmid: 23648264
[14]	Hastings, P. D., & De, I. (2008). Parasympathetic regulation and parental socialization of emotion: Biopsychosocial processes of adjustment in preschoolers. Social Development, 17 (2), 211-238.
[15]	Heng, S. P. (2014). The influence of parents' emotional expression and emotional instruction on children's aggressive behavior: The mediating role of emotion regulation ability. Journal of Xinyang Normal University (Philos. & Soc. Sci. Edit.), 34 (5), 24-28.
	[ 衡书鹏. (2014). 父母情绪表达, 情绪教导对儿童攻击行为的影响——情绪调节能力的中介作用. 信阳师范学院学报:哲学社会科学版, 34 (5), 24-28.]
[16]	Hinnant, J. B., & El-Sheikh, M. (2009). Children's externalizing and internalizing symptoms over time: The role of individual differences in patterns of RSA responding. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37 (8), 1049-1061. doi: 10.1007/s10802-009-9341-1 URLpmid: 19711181
[17]	Hu, R., Liang, Z. B., Zhang, G. Z., Deng, H. H. (2017). The perspective of emotional parenting:Relation between parental meta-emotion philosophy and children's psychosocial adjustment. Advances in Psychological Science, 25 (4), 599-608.
	[ 胡瑞, 梁宗保, 张光珍, 邓慧华. (2017). 情绪教养视角: 父母元情绪理念与儿童心理社会适应. 心理科学进展, 25 (4), 599-608.]
[18]	Hu, T. L., Xu, M. Z., & Ye, G. H. (2002). Feeling, emotion and culture. Taipei, China: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica.
	[ 胡台丽, 许木柱, 叶光辉. (2002). 情感、情绪与文化. 台北, 中央研究院民族学研究所.]
[19]	Katz, L. F., & Gottman, J. M. (1995). Vagal tone protects children from marital conflict. Development and Psychopathology, 7 (1), 83-92.
[20]	Katz, L. F., & Windecker-Nelson, B. (2004). Parental meta-emotion philosophy in families with conduct-problem children: Links with peer relations. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32 (4), 385-398. doi: 10.1023/b:jacp.0000030292.36168.30 URLpmid: 15305544
[21]	Kogan, A., Oveis, C., Carr, E. W., Gruber, J., Mauss, I. B., Shallcross, A., Keltner, D. (2014). Vagal activity is quadratically related to prosocial traits, prosocial emotions, and observer perceptions of prosociality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107 (6), 1051-1063. doi: 10.1037/a0037509 URLpmid: 25243414
[22]	Lagacé-Séguin, D. G., & Coplan, R. J. (2005). Maternal emotional styles and child social adjustment: Assessment, correlates, outcomes and goodness of fit in early childhood. Review of Social Development, 14 (4), 613-636. doi: 10.1111/sode.2005.14.issue-4 URL
[23]	Li, Y., He, T. T., Yu, K., & Liu, P. L. (2010). The relations between parental coping with children's negative emotions and children's social skill and the quality of moos. Journal of Psychological Science, 33 (2), 452-455.
	[ 李燕, 贺婷婷, 俞凯, 刘佩丽. (2010). 父母对孩子消极情绪的反应方式及其与幼儿社会技能关系的研究. 心理科学, 33 (2), 452-455.]
[24]	Liang, Z. B. (2009). The role of temperament and parents' emotional factors in children's social adaptation (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
	[ 梁宗保. (2009). 气质与父母情绪因素在儿童社会适应中的作用 (博士学位论文). 北京师范大学.]
[25]	Liang, Z. B., Hu, R., Zhang, G. Z., Deng, H. H., & Xia, M. (2016). Bidirectional relations between maternal meta-emotion philosophy and children's social adjustment among preschoolers: A longitudinal study. Psychological Development and Education, 32 (4), 394-401.
	[ 梁宗保, 胡瑞, 张光珍, 邓慧华, 夏敏. (2016). 母亲元情绪理念与学前儿童社会适应的相互作用关系. 心理发展与教育, 32 (4), 394-401.]
[26]	Liang, Z. B., Zhang, G. Z., Chen, H. C., & Zhang, P. (2011). Preschooler's emotion understanding development and its relation with parental meta-emotion philosophy. Psychological Development and Education, 27(3), 233-240.
	[ 梁宗保, 张光珍, 陈会昌, 张萍. (2011). 学前儿童情绪理解的发展及其与父母元情绪理念的关系. 心理发展与教育, 27 (3), 233-240.]
[27]	Liang, Z. B., Zhang, G. Z., Chen, H. C., & Zhang, P. (2012). Relations among parental meta-emotion philosophy, parental emotion expressivity, and children's social competence. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44 (2), 199-210.
	[ 梁宗保, 张光珍, 陈会昌, 张萍. (2012). 父母元情绪理念、情绪表达与儿童社会能力的关系. 心理学报, 44(2), 199-210.]
[28]	Liu, X. C., Guo, C. Q., Liu, L. Q., Wang, A. Z., Hu, L., Tang, M. Q., … Sun, L. M. (1997). Reliability and validity of achenbach youth self-report. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 11 (4), 200-203.
	[ 刘贤臣, 郭传琴, 刘连启, 王爱祯, 胡蕾, 唐茂芹, … 孙良民. (1997). Achenbach青少年行为自评量表的信度和效度研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 11 (4), 200-203.]
[29]	Lunkenheimer, E. S., Shields, A. M., & Cortina, K. S. (2007). Parental emotion coaching and dismissing in family interaction. Social Development, 16(2), 232-248.
[30]	Marcovitch, S., Leigh, J., Calkins, S. D., Leerks, E. M., O'Brien, M., & Blankson, A. N. (2010). Moderate vagal withdrawal in 3.5-year-old children is associated with optimal performance on executive function tasks. Developmental Psychobiology, 52 (6), 603-608. doi: 10.1002/dev.20462 URLpmid: 20806334
[31]	McLaughlin, K. A., Alves, S., & Sheridan, M. A. (2014). Vagal regulation and internalizing psychopathology among adolescents exposed to childhood adversity. Developmental psychobiology, 56 (5), 1036-1051. doi: 10.1002/dev.21187 URLpmid: 24338154
[32]	Neuhaus, E., Bernier, R., & Beauchaine, T. P. (2014). Brief report: Social skills, internalizing and externalizing symptoms, and respiratory sinus arrhythmia in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44 (3), 730-737. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1923-7 URLpmid: 23982488
[33]	Parke, R. D. (2002). Fathers and families. Handbook of Parenting, 3, 27-73.
[34]	Perry, N. B., Calkins, S. D., Nelson, J. A., Leerkes, E. M., & Marcovitch, S. (2012). Mothers' responses to children's negative emotions and child emotion regulation: The moderating role of vagal suppression. Developmental Psychobiology, 54 (5), 503-513. doi: 10.1002/dev.20608 URLpmid: 22072217
[35]	Perry, N. B., Nelson, J. A., Calkins, S. D., Leerkes, E. M., O'brien, M., & Marcovitch, S. (2014). Early physiological regulation predicts the trajectory of externalizing behaviors across the preschool period. Developmental Psychobiology, 56 (7), 1482-1491. URLpmid: 24909987
[36]	Porges, S. W. (2007). The polyvagal perspective. Biological Psychology, 74 (2), 116-143. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.06.009 URLpmid: 17049418
[37]	Qiu, Y. Y. (2005). The influence of maternal meta-emotion philosophy and parenting style on adolescent depression: the role of adolescent's emotion regulation ability (Unpublished doctoral thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, China.
	[ 邱雅沂. (2005). 母亲后设情绪理念, 教养态度对青少年忧郁倾向的影响: 青少年情绪调节能力的角色 (博士学位论文). 台湾师范大学.]
[38]	Raine, A. (2002). Annotation: The role of prefrontal deficits, low autonomic arousal, and early health factors in the development of antisocial and aggressive behavior in children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43 (4), 417-434. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00034 URLpmid: 12030589
[39]	Shanahan, L., Calkins, S. D., Keane, S. P., Kelleher, R., & Suffness, R. (2014). Trajectories of internalizing symptoms across childhood: The roles of biological self-regulation and maternal psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 26 (402), 1353-1368. doi: 10.1017/S0954579414001072 URL
[40]	Soto, J. A., Perez, C. R., Kim, Y. H., Lee, E. A., & Minnick, M. R. (2011). Is expressive suppression always associated with poorer psychological functioning? A cross-cultural comparison between European Americans and Hong Kong Chinese. Emotion, 11(6), 1450-1455. doi: 10.1037/a0023340 URLpmid: 21707152
[41]	Stover, J. (2003). Fathers' meta-emotion and children's social status (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Seattle Pacific University.
[42]	Utendale, W. T., Nuselovici, J., Saint‐Pierre, A. B., Hubert, M., Chochol, C., & Hastings, P. D. (2014). Associations between inhibitory control, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, and externalizing problems in early childhood. Developmental Psychobiology, 56 (4), 686-699. doi: 10.1002/dev.21136 URLpmid: 23765984
[43]	Van der Graaff, J., Meeus, W., de Wied, M., van Boxtel, A., van Lier, P., & Branje, S. (2016). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia moderates the relation between parent-adolescent relationship quality and adolescents' social adjustment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44 (2), 269-281. URLpmid: 25711459
[44]	Ye, G. H., Zheng, X. P., & Yang, Y. R. (2005). The influence of maternal meta-emotion philosophy on children's attachment inclination. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 47 (2), 181-195.
	[ 叶光辉, 郑欣佩, 杨永瑞. (2005). 母亲的后设情绪理念对国小子女依附倾向的影响. 中华心理学刊, 47 (2), 181-195.]
[45]	Zhang, H., Wang, Z., You, X., Lü, W., & Luo, Y. (2015). Associations between narcissism and emotion regulation difficulties: Respiratory sinus arrhythmia reactivity as a moderator. Biological Psychology, 110, 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.06.014 URLpmid: 26159808