删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

他人面孔情绪知觉中自我参照与母亲参照的一致性:来自ERP的证据

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

丁小斌, 王睿, 康铁君(), 刘建邑, 周嘉宁
西北师范大学心理学院, 甘肃省行为与心理健康重点实验室, 兰州 730070
收稿日期:2019-05-14出版日期:2020-06-25发布日期:2020-04-22
通讯作者:康铁君E-mail:tiejunkang@163.com

基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金项目(31960181)

Consistency between self-reference and mother-reference in emotional perception of others' faces: Evidence from ERP

DING Xiao-bing, WANG Rui, KANG Tie-jun(), LIU Jian-yi, ZHOU Jia-ning
School of Psychology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
Received:2019-05-14Online:2020-06-25Published:2020-04-22
Contact:KANG Tie-jun E-mail:tiejunkang@163.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 本研究采用不同参照语境下的面孔情绪评定任务, 使用事件相关电位技术, 考察了自我参照、母亲参照及他人参照对面孔情绪知觉加工的影响。行为结果显示, 与他人参照相比, 在自我参照与母亲参照的消极语境中的面孔被认为更消极, 积极语境中的面孔被认为更积极。ERP的结果显示, 相比他人参照, 自我参照与母亲参照都能诱发更大的EPN波幅; 自我参照与母亲参照对EPN和LPP波幅的影响差异并不显著。这些研究结果表明, 自我参照和母亲参照在面孔情绪知觉上具有一致性, 本研究从他人面孔情绪加工的角度为中国人的自我结构中包含“母亲”成分提供了进一步的证据。



图1实验流程示意图
图1实验流程示意图



图2不同效价(消极、中性、积极)和参照(自我、母亲、他人)的语境中的面孔情绪效价、唤醒度评价
图2不同效价(消极、中性、积极)和参照(自我、母亲、他人)的语境中的面孔情绪效价、唤醒度评价


表1P1、N170、EPN、LPP成分在各实验条件下左右半球的平均波幅及标准差(M ± SD, μV)
成分 语境效价 自我 母亲 他人
P1 消极 0.14 ± 2.46 1.52 ± 2.43 -0.33 ± 2.08 0.46 ± 2.64 -1.12 ± 2.45 0.34 ± 1.71
中性 -0.27 ± 2.32 -0.10 ± 2.00 -0.75 ± 1.96 0.37 ± 2.37 -0.74 ± 1.86 0.12 ± 1.90
积极 -0.35 ± 2.33 0.22 ± 0.76 0.12 ± 1.46 1.40 ± 1.89 -0.07 ± 2.53 1.09 ± 2.40
N170 消极 -2.77 ± 3.40 -6.32 ± 4.97 -2.36 ± 2.79 -5.71 ± 4.46 -1.24 ± 4.36 -4.70 ± 5.35
中性 -1.71 ± 2.58 -5.32 ± 3.69 -2.40 ± 3.13 -5.65 ± 4.49 -1.57 ± 2.59 -4.41 ± 3.77
积极 -2.89 ± 2.78 -7.49 ± 5.50 -1.90 ± 3.23 -6.81 ± 4.69 -2.46 ± 3.02 -6.78 ± 4.51
EPN 消极 0.52 ± 3.17 0.81 ± 4.69 0.91 ± 3.54 1.32 ± 4.14 3.18 ± 3.01 2.95 ± 3.91
中性 2.40 ± 3.60 2.11 ± 3.72 1.11 ± 2.87 1.48 ± 3.65 2.74 ± 3.52 2.70 ± 4.11
积极 1.04 ± 3.48 0.73 ± 4.62 1.30 ± 2.86 1.07 ± 3.69 1.25 ± 2.92 0.68 ± 3.81
LPP 消极 0.08 ± 2.49 1.52 ± 2.43 -0.33 ± 2.08 0.46 ± 2.64 -1.12 ± 2.45 0.34 ± 1.71
中性 -0.27 ± 2.32 -0.10 ± 2.00 -0.75 ± 1.96 0.37 ± 2.37 -0.74 ± 1.86 0.12 ± 1.90
积极 -0.35 ± 2.34 0.22 ± 2.76 0.12 ± 0.46 1.40 ± 1.89 -0.07 ± 2.53 1.09 ± 2.40

表1P1、N170、EPN、LPP成分在各实验条件下左右半球的平均波幅及标准差(M ± SD, μV)
成分 语境效价 自我 母亲 他人
P1 消极 0.14 ± 2.46 1.52 ± 2.43 -0.33 ± 2.08 0.46 ± 2.64 -1.12 ± 2.45 0.34 ± 1.71
中性 -0.27 ± 2.32 -0.10 ± 2.00 -0.75 ± 1.96 0.37 ± 2.37 -0.74 ± 1.86 0.12 ± 1.90
积极 -0.35 ± 2.33 0.22 ± 0.76 0.12 ± 1.46 1.40 ± 1.89 -0.07 ± 2.53 1.09 ± 2.40
N170 消极 -2.77 ± 3.40 -6.32 ± 4.97 -2.36 ± 2.79 -5.71 ± 4.46 -1.24 ± 4.36 -4.70 ± 5.35
中性 -1.71 ± 2.58 -5.32 ± 3.69 -2.40 ± 3.13 -5.65 ± 4.49 -1.57 ± 2.59 -4.41 ± 3.77
积极 -2.89 ± 2.78 -7.49 ± 5.50 -1.90 ± 3.23 -6.81 ± 4.69 -2.46 ± 3.02 -6.78 ± 4.51
EPN 消极 0.52 ± 3.17 0.81 ± 4.69 0.91 ± 3.54 1.32 ± 4.14 3.18 ± 3.01 2.95 ± 3.91
中性 2.40 ± 3.60 2.11 ± 3.72 1.11 ± 2.87 1.48 ± 3.65 2.74 ± 3.52 2.70 ± 4.11
积极 1.04 ± 3.48 0.73 ± 4.62 1.30 ± 2.86 1.07 ± 3.69 1.25 ± 2.92 0.68 ± 3.81
LPP 消极 0.08 ± 2.49 1.52 ± 2.43 -0.33 ± 2.08 0.46 ± 2.64 -1.12 ± 2.45 0.34 ± 1.71
中性 -0.27 ± 2.32 -0.10 ± 2.00 -0.75 ± 1.96 0.37 ± 2.37 -0.74 ± 1.86 0.12 ± 1.90
积极 -0.35 ± 2.34 0.22 ± 2.76 0.12 ± 0.46 1.40 ± 1.89 -0.07 ± 2.53 1.09 ± 2.40



图3消极自我、消极母亲、消极他人三种实验条件下ENP成分总平均波形图
图3消极自我、消极母亲、消极他人三种实验条件下ENP成分总平均波形图



图4消极语境中面孔唤醒度评分与EPN波幅的相关关系图
图4消极语境中面孔唤醒度评分与EPN波幅的相关关系图



图5消极自我、消极母亲、消极他人三种实验条件下LPP总平均波形图
图5消极自我、消极母亲、消极他人三种实验条件下LPP总平均波形图







[1] Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., Mashek, D., Lewandowski, G., Wright, S. C., & Aron, E. N . (2004). Including others in the self. European Review of Social Psychology, 15(1), 101-132.
doi: 10.1080/10463280440000008URL
[2] Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R . (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497URL
[3] Calvo, M. G., & Beltrán, David . (2013). Recognition advantage of happy faces: Tracing the neurocognitive processes. Neuropsychologia, 51(11), 2051-2061.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.010URL
[4] Desimone, R., & Duncan, J . (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193-222.
[5] Devue, C., & Brédart, S . (2008). Attention to self-referential stimuli: Can I ignore my own face?. Acta Psychologica, 128(2), 290-297.
[6] Ding, X. B., Kang, T. J., Zhao, X., & Fu, J. J . (2018). A comparison for machine processing of emotional body language and facial expression. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(3), 423-432.
[ 丁小斌, 康铁君, 赵鑫, 付军军 . (2018). 躯体表情与面部表情加工进程比较. 心理科学进展, 26(3), 423-432.]
[7] Fields, E. C., & Kuperberg, G. R . (2012). It's all about you: An ERP study of emotion and self-relevance in discourse. Neuroimage, 62(1), 562-574.
[8] Hajcak, G., Weinberg, A., MacNamara, A., & Foti, D . (2012). ERPs and the study of emotion. The Oxford Handbook of Event-related Potential Components, 441, 474.
[9] Han, S., & Ma, Y . (2014). Cultural differences in human brain activity: A quantitative meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 99, 293-300.
[10] Han, S., & Northoff, G . (2008). Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: A transcultural neuroimaging approach. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(8), 646-654.
[11] Han, S., Northoff, G., Vogeley, K., Wexler, B. E., Kitayama, S., & Varnum, M. E. W . (2013). A cultural neuroscience approach to the biosocial nature of the human brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 335-359.
[12] He, X., & Zhu, Y . (2010). Social cognitive neuroscience studies on the self. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis. 46(6), 1021-1024.
[ 贺熙, 朱滢 . (2010). 社会认知神经科学关于自我的研究. 北京大学学报(自然科学版)网络版, 46(6), 1021-1024.]
[13] Herbert, C., Sf?rlea, A., & Blumenthal, T . (2013). Your emotion or mine: Labeling feelings alters emotional face perception—An ERP study on automatic and intentional affect labeling. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 378.
[14] Hietanen, J. K., Kirjavainen, I., & Nummenmaa, L . (2014). Additive effects of affective arousal and top-down attention on the event-related brain responses to human bodies. Biological Psychology, 103, 167-175.
[15] Hirsh, J. B., & Inzlicht, M . (2008). The devil you know: Neuroticism predicts neural response to uncertainty. Psychological Science, 19(10), 962-967.
[16] Klein, F., Iffland, B., Schindler, S., Wabnitz, P., & Neuner, F . (2015). This person is saying bad things about you: The influence of physically and socially threatening context information on the processing of inherently neutral faces. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(4), 736-748.
[17] Lang, P. J., & Bradley, M. M . (2010). Emotion and the motivational brain. Biological Psychology, 84(3), 437-450.
[18] Li, J., Galley, M., Brockett, C., Spithourakis, G. P., Gao, J., & Dolan, B . (2016). A persona-based neural conversation model. Association for Computational Linguistics, 1, 994-1003.
[19] Li, S., Zhu, X., Ding, R., Ren, J., & Luo, W . (2019). The effect of emotional and self-referential contexts on ERP responses towards surprised faces. Biological Psychology, 146, 107728.
[20] Liu, Y . (1990). Word frequency dictionary/phonetic sequence of modern Chinese common words. Aerospace Publishing House.
[ 刘源 . (1990). 现代汉语常用词词频词典/音序部分. 宇航出版社.]
[21] Luo, Q. L., Wang, H. L., Dzhelyova, M., Huang, P., & Mo, L . (2016). Effect of affective personality information on face processing: Evidence from ERPs. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 810.
[22] Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S . (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
[23] Mattan, B., Quinn, K. A., Apperly, I. A., Sui, J., & Rotshtein, P . (2015). Is it always me first? Effects of self-tagging on third-person perspective-taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 41(4), 1100-1117.
[24] McCrackin, S. D., & Itier, R. J . (2018). Is it about me? Time-course of self-relevance and valence effects on the perception of neutral faces with direct and averted gaze. Biological Psychology, 135, 47-64.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.03.003URL
[25] Minear, M., & Park, D. C . (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 36(4), 630-633.
[26] Moran, J. M., Macrae, C. N., Heatherton, T. F., Wyland, C. L., & Kelley, W. M . (2006). Neuroanatomical evidence for distinct cognitive and affective components of self. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(9), 1586-1594.
[27] Mu, Y., & Han, S . (2010). Neural oscillations involved in self-referential processing. Neuroimage, 53(2), 757-768.
[28] Ng, S. H., Han, S., Mao, L., & Lai, J. C. L . (2010). Dynamic bicultural brains: fMRI study of their flexible neural representation of self and significant others in response to culture primes. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(2), 83-91.
[29] Northoff, G., Heinzel, A., de Greck, M., Bermpohl, F., Dobrowolny, H., & Panksepp, J . (2006). Self-referential processing in our brain — A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self. Neuroimage, 31(1), 440-457.
[30] Petersen, S. E., & Posner, M. I . (2012). The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35, 73-89.
[31] Rellecke, J., Sommer, W., & Schacht, A . (2013). Emotion effects on the N170: A question of reference? Brain Topography, 26(1), 62-71.
[32] Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S . (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(9), 677-688.
[33] Rossion, B., & Caharel, S . (2011). ERP evidence for the speed of face categorization in the human brain: Disentangling the contribution of low-level visual cues from face perception. Vision Research, 51(12), 1297-1311.
[34] Sabatinelli, D., Keil, A., Frank, D. W., & Lang, P. J . (2013). Emotional perception: Correspondence of early and late event-related potentials with cortical and subcortical functional MRI. Biological Psychology, 92(3), 513-519.
[35] Schindler, S., & Kissler, J . (2016). People matter: Perceived sender identity modulates cerebral processing of socio- emotional language feedback. NeuroImage, 134, 160-169.
[36] Schwarz, K. A., Wieser, M. J., Gerdes, A. B. M., Mühlberger, A., & Pauli, P . (2013). Why are you looking like that? How the context influences evaluation and processing of human faces. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 8(4), 438-445.
[37] Suess, F., Rabovsky, M., & Rahman, R. A . (2015). Perceiving emotions in neutral faces: Expression processing is biased by affective person knowledge. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(4), 531-536.
[38] Sui, J., & Gu, X . (2017). Self as object: Emerging trends in self research. Trends in Neurosciences, 40(11), 643-653.
doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2017.09.002URL
[39] Sui, J., & Humphreys, G. W . (2015). The integrative self: How self-reference integrates perception and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(12), 719-728.
[40] Sui, J., Liu, C. H., & Han, S . (2009). Cultural difference in neural mechanisms of self-recognition. Social Neuroscience, 4(5), 402-411.
[41] Sui, J., Zhu, Y., & Han, S . (2006). Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions: An event-related brain potential study. Neuroreport, 17(4), 423-427.
[42] Tan, Q., Yin, Y. Y., Liu, Y., Han, S.F., Xu, Q., & Zhang, L . (2018). The influence of positive emotion on the degree effect in self-referential processes: Evidence from ERPs. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(10), 1120-1130.
[ 谭群, 尹月阳, 刘燊, 韩尚锋, 徐强, 张林 . (2018). 自我积极表情加工优势效应: 来自ERPs的证据. 心理学报, 50(10), 1120-1130.]
[43] Truong, G., & Todd, R. M . (2017). Soap opera: Self as object and agent in prioritizing attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(6), 937-952.
[44] Vanderwal, T., Hunyadi, E., Grupe, D. W., Connors, C. M., & Schultz, R. T . (2008). Self, mother and abstract other: An fMRI study of reflective social processing. Neuroimage, 41(4), 1437-1446.
[45] Wang, B., Fu, Y., & Zhang, J. J . (2019). Influence of language and culture on retrieval-induced forgetting under the self-referential condition: Evidence from the Han and the Mosuo. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(4), 450-461.
[ 王斌, 付雅, 张积家 . (2019). 语言和文化对自我参照条件下提取诱发遗忘的影响——来自汉族人和摩梭人的证据. 心理学报, 51(4), 450-461.]
[46] Wang, G., Mao, L., Ma, Y., Yang, X., Cao, J., Liu, X., ... Han, S. H . (2012). Neural representations of close others in collectivistic brains. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 222-229.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr002URL
[47] Wang, X., Zhu, Q., Song, Y., & Liu, J . (2017). Developmental reorganization of the core and extended face networks revealed by global functional connectivity. Cerebral Cortex, 28(10), 3521-3530.
[48] Wieser, M. J., & Brosch, T . (2012). Faces in context: A review and systematization of contextual influences on affective face processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 471.
[49] Wieser, M. J., Gerdes, A. B. M., Büngel, I., Schwarz, K. A., Mühlberger, A., & Pauli, P . (2014). Not so harmless anymore: How context impacts the perception and electrocortical processing of neutral faces. NeuroImage, 92, 74-82.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.022URL
[50] Wieser, M. J., Gerdes, A. B. M., Greiner, R., Reicherts, P., & Pauli, P . (2012). Tonic pain grabs attention, but leaves the processing of facial expressions intact — Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 90(3), 242-248.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.03.019URL
[51] Willenbockel, V., Sadr, J., Fiset, D., Horne, G. O., Gosselin, F., & Tanaka, J. W . (2010). Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 671-684.
doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.671URL
[52] Williams, L. M . (2006). An integrative neuroscience model of "significance" processing. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 5(1), 1-47.
doi: 10.1142/S0219635206001082URL
[53] Wuyun, G., Shu, M., Cao, Z., Huang, W., Zou, X., Li, S., ... Wu, Y. H . (2014). Neural representations of the self and the mother for Chinese individuals. Plos One, 9(3), e91556.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091556URL
[54] Xia, M., Li, X. M., Ye, C., & Li, H . (2014). The ERPs for the facial expression processing. Advances in Psychological Science, 22(10), 1556-1563.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01556URL
[ 侠牧, 李雪榴, 叶春, 李红 . (2014). 面部表情加工的ERP成分. 心理科学进展, 22(10), 1556-1563.]
[55] Xia, R. X., Zhou, A. B., Li S., F., Xu, K. P., Ren, D. Y., & Zhu, J . (2014). The moderating effect of perspective taking in implicit emotional processing. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(8), 1094-1102.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.01094URL
[ 夏瑞雪, 周爱保, 李世峰, 徐科朋, 任德云, 朱婧 . (2014). 观点采择在内隐情绪加工中的调节作用. 心理学报, 46(8), 1094-1102.]
[56] Yang, H. S., & Zhu, Y . (2004). The self and retrieval-induced forgetting. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 36(02), 154-159.
[ 杨红升, 朱滢 . (2004). 自我与提取诱发遗忘现象. 心理学报, 36(2), 154-159.]
[57] Yuan, J., Tian, Y., Huang, X., Fan, H., & Wei, X . (2019). Emotional Bias varies with Stimulus type, Arousal and Task setting: Meta-analytic evidences. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 107, 461-472.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.035URL
[58] Zhang, L., Zhou, T. G., Zhang, J., Liu, Z. X., Fan, J., & Zhou, Y . (2005). Looking for Chinese self: A fMRI study. Science in China (Series C), 35(5), 472-478.
[ 张力, 周天罡, 张剑, 刘祖祥, 范津, 朱滢 . (2005). 寻找中国人的自我: 一项fMRI研究. 中国科学C辑:生命科学, 35(5), 472-478.]
[59] Zhang, T., Zhu, Y., & Wu, Y . (2014). Losing oneself upon placement in another's position: The influence of perspective on self-referential processing. Consciousness & Cognition, 27(1), 53-61.
[60] Zhou, A. B., Zhang, F., Ma, X. F., Xia, R. X., & Li, J. S . (2015). The cultural differences of imam-reference Processing: Based on the retrieval-induce forgetting paradigm discussed. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(6), 757-764.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00757URL
[ 周爱保, 张奋, 马小凤, 李建升, 夏瑞雪 . (2015). 阿訇参照效应的文化差异: 基于提取诱发遗忘范式的探讨. 心理学报, 47(6), 757-764.]
[61] Zhu, Y., & Zhang, L . (2001). An experimental study on the self-reference effect. Science China Press 31(6), 537-543.
[ 朱滢, 张力 . (2001). 自我记忆效应的实验研究. 中国科学, 31(6), 537-543.]
[62] Zhu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, J., & Han, S . (2007). Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation. Neuroimage, 34(3), 1310-1316.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.047URL
[63] Zhu, X. R., Zhang, Y., Yang, S. Y., Wu, H. Y., Wang, L. L., & Gu, R. L . (2015). The motivational hierarchy between self and mother: Evidence from the feedback-related negativity. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(6), 807-813.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00807URL
[ 朱湘茹, 张艳, 杨苏勇, 伍海燕, 王丽丽, 古若雷 . (2015). 母亲与自我具有相同的动机等级: 来自结果评价的FRN证据. 心理学报, 47(6), 807-813.]




[1]章鹏程,李杨卓,周淑金,高湘萍,潘鑫. 自我参照加工的近空间距离增强效应:来自行为与ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(8): 879-889.
[2]王斌, 付雅, 张积家. 语言和文化对自我参照条件下提取诱发遗忘的影响——来自汉族人和摩梭人的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(4): 450-461.
[3]杨群,冯意然,张积家. 父亲参照效应的语言与文化差异:来自提取诱发遗忘的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(3): 304-315.
[4]范伟;钟毅平;杨子鹿;李琎;欧阳益; 蔡荣华; 李慧云 ;傅小兰 . 外倾个体的自我参照加工程度效应[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(8): 1002-1012.
[5]王爱君;沈路;迟莹莹;刘晓乐;陈骐;张明. 听障和听力正常人群空间主导性和空间参照框架的交互作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(2): 153-162.
[6]周爱保;刘沛汝;张彦驰;尹玉龙. 老年人的朋友参照效应[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(9): 1143-1151.
[7]周爱保;张奋;马小凤;李建升;夏瑞雪. 阿訇参照效应的文化差异:基于提取诱发遗忘范式的探讨[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(6): 757-764.
[8]魏萍;康冠兰;丁锦红;郭春彦. 奖赏预期对面孔情绪加工的影响:一项事件相关电位研究[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(4): 437-449.
[9]钟毅平;范伟;蔡荣华;谭千保;肖丽辉;占友龙;罗西;秦敏辉. 正性情绪诱导下的自我参照加工:来自ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(3): 341-352 .
[10]杨文静;刘培朵;崔茜;郝鑫;肖宵;张庆林. 自我参照对情绪性记忆定向遗忘的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(2): 156-164.
[11]王凌云,张明,隋洁. 自我参照框架决定了自我面孔优势效应的出现[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(05): 494-499.
[12]周荣刚,张侃. 基于场景记忆的参照系整合过程中的物体方位判断[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(12): 1229-1239.
[13]周荣刚, 张侃. 多参照系条件下信息获取方式对绝对方位判断的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(11): 1137-1148.
[14]周丽,苏彦捷. 实际亲密度对恋人参照效应的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(04): 487-495.
[15]陶维东,孙弘进,闫京江,周柳. 自我和物体为参照系的心理旋转分离:内旋效应[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(01): 14-24.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4715
相关话题/心理 实验 科学 语言 流程